Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1577 . ~) - RESOLUTION NO. 1577 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDmONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 98-017 AND ARClllTECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. ADR 98-018 FOR A CELLULAR TELECOMMUNICATIONS FACILITY AND A 45-FOOT TALL MONOPOLE ANTENNAE STRUCTURE AT 12340 LOWER AZUSA ROAD. WHEREAS, on June 29, 1998, an application was filed by Airtouch Cellular to establish a cellular telecommunications facility and a 45-foot tall monopole antennae structure; Development Services Department Case Nos. CUP 98-017 and ADR 98-018, at 12340 Lower Azusa Road, more particularly described as follows: Parcel I of Parcel Map No. 17535 in the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as recorded in Map Book 186, Pages 38, 39 & 40 in the Office of said County Recorder. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on August II, 1998, at which time all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the factual data submitted by the Development Services Department in the attached report is true and correct. SECTION 2. This Commission finds: 1. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public health or welfare, nor injurious to the property or improvements in the zone or vicinity. 2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is properly one for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized. 3. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use, and all yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking, loading, landscaping and other features required to adjust said use with the land and uses in the neighborhood. 4. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use. . .. . S. That the subject property is designated for industrial use in the General Plan, that the proposed use is consistent with that designation, and that the granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the comprehensive general plan. 6. That the evaluation of the environmental impacts as set forth in the initial study are appropriate and that the project will have no significant effect upon the environment within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and, when considering the project as a whole, there was no evidence before the City that the proposed project would have any potentially adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends, and therefore, a Negative Dec1aration should be approved. SECTION 3. That for the foregoing reasons this Commission approves Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 98-017 and Architectural Design Review No. ADR 98-018 to establish a cellular telecommunications filciIity and a 4S-foot tall monopole antennae structure at 12340 Lower Azusa Road, subject to the fonowing conditions: 1. The cellular installation and the site shaI1 be constructed and maintained in a manner that is consistent with the proposal and plans submitted and approved for CUP 98-017 and ADR 98-018. The monopole antennae structure shaI1 be finished in a manner that is consistent with the other installation at this site, and the new trash enclosure shaI1 match the existing enclosure. The final finish scheme shaI1 be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Administrator. 2. All City code requirements and policies regarding accessibility, civil engineering, construction, fire protection, maintenance of public filciIities, plan checking, safety, and utility services shaI1 be complied with to the satisfaction of the various City Departments. 3. Approval of CUP 98-017 and ADR 98-018 shaI1 not take effect until the property owner and applicant have executed and filed the Acceptance Form available from the Development Services Department to indicate acceptance of the conditions of approval. 4. All conditions of approval shall be satisfied prior to completion and operation of the new cellular installation. Noncompliance with the plans, provisions and conditions of CUP 98-017 and ADR 98-018 shaI1 be grounds for immediate suspension or revocation of any approvals, which could result in cessation of operation and removal of the installation. -2- IS77 . . . SECTION 4. The decision, findings, and conditions of approval contained in this Resolution reflect the Planning Commission's action of August 11, 1998, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Huang, Murphy, Sleeter and Bruckner NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Kalemkiarian SECTION 5. The Secretary shall certifY to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause a copy to be forwarded to the City Council of the City of Arcadia. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 1577 was adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on August 25, 1998, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Bruckner, Huang, Murphy, Sleeter, Kalemkiarian NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None C Planning Commission City f Arcadia ~~~ Secretary, Planning C 'ssion City of Arcadia APPROVED AS TO FORM: 1rl~.~~~ City of Arcadia -3- 1577 STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT August 11, 1998 TO: Chairman and Members of the Arcadia City Planning Commission FROM: Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator By: James M. KiIsama, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 98-017 & ADR 98-018 - A Cellular Telecommunications Facility and a 45-Foot Tall Monopole Antennae Structure at 12340 Lower Azusa Road. . SUMMARY The Conditional Use Permit and Architectural Design ReView applications were submitted by Airtouch Cellular to establish a cellular telecommunications facility and erect a 45-foot tall monopole antelllllle structure within the existing self-storage facility at 12340 Lower Azusa Road. The Development Services Department is recommending approval subject to the. conditions listed in this report. GENERAL INFORMATION APPUCANT: Airtouch Cellular LOCATION: 12340 Lower Azusa Road REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit and Architectural Design Review for a cellular telecommunications facility and a 45-foot tall monopole antennae structure. SITE AREA: 126,324 sq. ft. (2.90 acres) FRONTAGES: 968.30 feet along Lower Azusa Road GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Industrial EXISTING LAND USE & ZONING: The site is improved with a self-storage facility and a cellular telecommunications facility with a 50-'foot tall monopole antennae structure for Cox California PCS. The site is zoned M-2. . . . . l _ SURROUNDING LAND USES & ZONING: North: Quany zoned M-2 South: Vacant parcel zoned M-2; and single-family residential in El Monte East: San Gabriel River with recreational and agricultural activity in Irwindale West: Quarry zoned M-2 BACKGROUND Communication equipment facilities are permitted in any zone with a Conditional Use Permit (Sec. 9275.1.11). The proposed location is at an existing self-storage facility. The subject property is zoned M-2 for industrial uses. The subject site was developed in 1986 with a 62.800 sq. ft. self-storage facility. In 1996, Cox California PCS was granted approval of CUP 96-007. Variance 96-003 and ADR 96-013 for a cellular telecommunications facility with a 50-foot tall monopole antennae structure at the north end of the subject property. The Cox California PCS facility required a variance because the height limit for structures and ancillaIy equipment in the M-2 zone is 45 feet. Cellular telecommllnicationsare established on a network basis. The overlapping of networks by competing cellular companies is a common situation. Such overlapping can sometimes result in a proliferation of antennae structures in an area. This proposal will be the second cellular monopole antennae structure in the subject area. PROPOSAL & ANALYSIS The proposal is to house the telecommunications equipment in one of the. existing self-storage units and connect it to a 45-foot tall steel monopole with underground conduit. The monopole will support 21 directional and 3 microwave antennae. Also included are 3 small synchronization antennae on top of the storage unit. This installation will allow for wireless interconnects with other communications facilities in the area and allow for an independent communication network that will be able to function even if electrical service is discontinued during an emergency. Site Selection The need for a cellular instal1ation is determined by the amount of cellular activity in an area and the distances between other installations. To establish a network, distances between installations are determined on the basis of signal range and quality. The proposed installation is necessary to provide adequate signal generation for the cellular activity in this area. In selecting a location for a new installation, a "Search Ring" is established within which the new installation must be located. Ideally. the new installation would be at the center of the search ring. For practical purposes, commercial and industrial sites are considered first. The applicant has CUP 98-017 & ADR 98-018 August 11. 1998 Page 2 . determined that the proposed location is adequate for their needs. The impacts upon surrounding properties will be minimal. Site Improvements & Architectural Deshm Review The location for the proposed telecommunications equipment is a comer unit of the self-storage facility. The monopole will be located approximately 30 feet behind the main entrance gate to the self-storage facility, which will be approximately 95 feet from Lower Azusa Road. The monopole will be adjacent to the south wall of a storage building. The equipment will be connected to the antennae by an underground conduit. The monopole will support 3 panels in a triangular configuration. Each panel will have 7 directional antennae. There will also be 3, 4-foot diameter microwave antennae on the monopole below the cellular panels. In addition, the applicant is providing an additional trash enclosure adjacent to an existing trash enclosure. Architectural considerations for the proposed installation are limited. The color of the monopole has not been indicated. For other installations, a light blue-gray finish has been used which helps the monopole blend into the surroundings. The additional trash enclosure should be constructed and finished to match the existing enclosure. The entrance area to the storage facility is adequately landscaped. . CEOA Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Development Services Department has prepared an initial study for the proposed project. Said initial study did not disclose any substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise and objects of historical or aesthetic significance. When considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have any potential for adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project. RECOMMENDATION The Development Services Department recommends approval of Conditional Use Pennit No. CUP 98-017 and Architectural Design Review No. ADR 98-018, subject to the following conditions: 1. The cellular installation and the site shall be constructed and maintained in a manner that is consistent with the proposal and plans submitted and approved for CUP 98-017 and ADR 98-018. The monopole antennae structure shall be painted to blend in with the surrounding elements, and the new trash enclosure shall match the existing enclosure. The final finish scheme shall be reviewed and approved by the Community Development Administrator. . CUP 98-017 &ADR 98-018 August 11, 1998 Page 3 . . . 2. All City code requirements and policies regarding accessibility, civil engineering, construction, fire protection, maintenance of public facilities, plan checking, safety, and utility services shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the various City Departments. 3. Approval of CUP 98-017 and ADR 98-018 shall not take effect unti1 the property owner and applicant have executed and filed the Acceptance Form available from the Development Services Department to indicate acceptance of the conditions of approval. 4. All conditions of approval shall be satisfied prior to completion and operation of the new cellular installation. Noncompliance with the plans, provisions and conditions of CUP 98-017 and ADR 98-018 shall be grounds for immediate suspension or revocation of any approvals, which could result in cessation of operation and removal of the instaIlation. FINDINGS AND MOTIONS Approval The Planning Commission should move to approve and file the Negative Declaration and direct staff to prepare a resolution incorporating the Commission's decision, supporting findings and conditions of approval as set forth in the staff report, or as modified by the Commission. ~ The Commission should move for denial and direct staff to prepare a resolution incorporating the Commission's decision and supporting findings. If any Planning Commissioner, or other interested party has any questions or comments regarding this matter prior to the August 11 tb public hearing, please contact Associate Planner, fun Kasama at (626) 574-5445. Approved by: 4~~ ,~~~ Community Development Administrator Attachments: Plan Photographs Vicinity Map Negative Declaration & Initial Study CUP 98-017 & ADR 98-018 August 11, 1998 Page 4 - ------.-- -.~-- ---.-- '---------- -- ---------- --- --------- - --::-- --- -.... - ~.-. ~ --, - -:::-- - - -........ 1ft/li'lIlQlGICIlI -... -... IIJI:I'CI$rDlJ:ltr;ftDillrl>>' -....... -... acaUliltuWJ' ..\ ...~- -... .......$OIIICI-_ .. fOil...... ..- I..-IIW" --~ .~- , ~/;~0~: !-!.. --1-" -rr-llI(CliIOIIft MD..... IJ ~..:r~ ,'(L~ J/~~ftlIQp /1 -:"'oc;'o':':':= II II "OlIC1'U~'" IJ ~lS"'__1O II :..=~:..1tS!t1l " ...... ". II U'llll.,__ II _-_IIII~ .__,,__ CPI, ~'.. ..,..~ _.,.......tIU ~-I__..r_ -- --- ~ - SOUTH ElEVATlON OF BUILDING T' yr....... PARTIAL SITE PLAN .,....... -... -'I" . '--- '- - -- - ~. -, -, SITE FUN ut...._. --- 1,.......___ --.-. -- -'. a"..___ -- -.........-.-... - '--lJImIJllH Oll/D/JII ---'i I -, ---.. .-- ...-..- I_ca.._ _ -...- 1, .', ., ~.. ,---- -> e,. -7 """ "'" I~, _.._'~lII'I'_ .".."tJ'l )'ItI__.QI'^..."MWtIlo m )" ___.o,r-._ __litl, . fllll-......Illllil-..t ........~f1l ,... ___IOIW"- .1I_lIl>> 1_'11II.......'...("'"..,0::._ O-"__I.CII\llD..U ""'1l.~CI..II'I\I,lo"lllO , ..1'cnr...lIU'u:llC.... _000'" _""-.DUlI"- Il~ .... Ill. .....~ '"II "__''''._ ....-..--- ._.......,,~. '-'" - ..-...... --...- .......-.- -............ ....~. ,aO'ECT 'ftfOIlfA,TION lp,lit...i: AJt\ooell Ceaurt.: _..._ ...UOlJCII........, =--==--- _ 11I4IIn'lIt .-.........- -.-........ hDptrt, ~ -..--. .---- CIII_':_" ..-..- -- SiI~~ripUo.: ---- -...-- ---- .....I.olo.<<..,cllr.l_ _Cml1n,., o.un Contad: _1UQA_~\IlJIIl.I ,.,..." QJ' Silr l44rn:e: lnoe...",..", --- "'''AVAII'..--J' 1CI I'>I'l. tl. _, VICINITY"..., I'IWJECT SITF.~e. "".,,"'_!, '"" '. . r,~~v~ltn ,'I '-. . - ~/.I; .. .' . , 11' i 1!' ~ . I' . 0 J E C TOE S r. K,J P T ION .--....ctlll.....15~..,.._IIlI.I_I/\I.._ lOOIllIIIl.lll'.....'"..,~.."__,UJ\l V'Otl__ 11lSOIl;"_"a..""'.t)....IWIl....'''' _C(IIOIu.-WJ ..._..-a......~... .""00f111'.''''''__-S __I UJ.....'-......- _.... .......OIfI,UIlIO'_..' 1l)...~DI__....._" 111010__ ...11I.... 1MI_ MIl (IIlllllil....1 .._ II( au,,/jt_~.. .11. 11ll_11S~ 1IlI.0000M.1lI ,,"I ~..._ .1(\", _,0', ""'11\ _,"".10I10l_",,",oIIU ,-......_ -<M.. ~lOtvoC"".N~.~..~'IUlIC_ 1..IIll...l_............O'~_. I>I\U[I...il~,", u.......lI\lKIr'1...ru.1I "" [WIr'IlOOIl~dIlI'lr nIClIOlC....IlI...IQu\lllll~......otloo'jl.....1Of LEe A LIS I T E D-E S C It I.r T I 0 H "",I 10"00 ~M..""tll>II_t_..llfI..nl' \UIIOlA'-,'Ilo"'.1I11l_IIUlar.:n II. "'....n ......... allll"... CIPItO..I.....UO Wt.tIl:II11 rt"'UI4J~; PIOPRIiTARY,,,..O.IATlON ..........,.. ~_lfII_lCI......_...... J ! <( ii. I.... I~i "C .I. E II '. .. CU - ~ - - l\J U ,IZ (~. ,I \- .' .. :. " ~iI~ o:l~ ." t;j e ~ ~.;." a::!! ~ CO- :l ~I . J.: ;. , . . 01 EXISTING PROPOSEO .,.--, A I R To u C H'" Cellular GRAVEL PITS West view Lower Azusa Rd. EXISTING PROPOSED ." AIRToucw Cellular GRAVl::L PITS North view from Lower Azusa Rd. and San Gabriel river EXISTING PROPOSED ." AIRToucH' Cellular GRAVEL PITS South view from.vacanrparcel 4 tJ- ! H .' IRWINDAL~ . . ;-, RlN a:' S o ~ Vicinity Map . PROJECT SITE: 12340 Lower Azusa Road - Site: Gravel Pits AIRTOUCH CELLULAR 3 PARK PLAZA IRVINE, CA 92714 . . . . . FileNo.: CUP9~17 CITY OF ARCADIA 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRiVE ARCADIA. CA 91007 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT NEGA TIVE DECLARATION A. Tide and Description of Project: Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 98-017: A Conditional Use Permit for the placement and maintenance of an unmanned wireless telecommunications facility and 4S foot tall monopole antennae platform and microwave antennae support. B. Location of Project: 12340 Lower Azusa Road, City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles c. Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Airtouch Cellular 3 Park Plaza - 6th Floor P.O. Box 19707 Irvine, CA 92713-9707 Contact: Nat D. Pendleton - Site Development Manager (949) 222-8276 D. Finding: This project will have no significant effect upon the environment within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 for the reasons set forth in the attached Initial Study. E. Mitigation measures. if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects: None Date Prepared: July 9, 1998 Date Posted: July 16, 1998 "'9 ~~ J M Kasama . te Planner . . . . . CITY OF ARCADIA 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE ARCADIA. CA 91007 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUTY ACT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Project Title: Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 98-017 2. Projeet Address: 12340 Lower Azusa Road, City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles 3. Project Sponsor's Name, Address & Telephone Number: Airtouch Ce1lular 3 Park Plaza - 6111 Floor P.O. Box 19707 Irvine, CA 92713-9707 Contact: Nat D. Pendleton, Site Development Manager (949) 222-8276 4. Lead Agency Name & Address: City of Arcadia - Development Services Department Community Development Division - Planning Services 240 W. Huntington Drive Arcadia, CA 91007 5. Lead Agency Contact Penon & Telephone Number: IamesM. Kasama, Associate P1anner- (626) 574-5445 6. General Plan Designation: Industrial 7. Zoning Classification: M.2: Heavy Manufacturing -1- File No.: CUP 984)17 CEQACbeck1ist 7/9S . . . . . FileNo.: CUP98~17 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action Involved, including but not limited to Jater phases of the project and any secoodmy, support, or oIf-site featun:s necessa')' for its implemeotation. Atlach additional sheets if n_.'Y.) A Conditional Use Permit for the placement and maintenance of an unmanned wireless teleeomm'lI1icatioDS facility and 45 foot tall monopole antp.nnae platform and microwave antennae support. 9. Other public agencies whose approval is required: (c.g., permits, financing, development or participation agn:emeDlS) Building Services & Fire Prevention Bureau must review and approve the plans for occupancy, and any tenant improvements. This project is also subject to approval by the Federal CommunicatioDS Commission. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentiaUy affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impactn as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. [ ] Land Use & Planning [ ] Population & Housing [ ] Geological Problems [ ] Water [ ] Air Quality [ ] Transportation I Circulation [ ] Biological Resources [ ] Energy and Mineral Resources [ ] Hazards [ ] Noise [ ] Public Services [ ] Utilities and Service Systems [ ] Aesthetics [ ] Cultural Resources [ ] Resources [ ] Mandatory Finding of Significance -2- CEQA Checklist 7/95 . . . . . File No.: CUP 98-017 DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead AgerJr;y) On the basis of this initial evaluation: [Xl I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [ I I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures descnbed on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [I I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and anENVlRONMENTAL IMPACf REPORT is required. [ I I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, but that at least one effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards and has been addressed by mitigation measures based on that earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, and if any remait\ing effect is a "Potentia11y Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," an ENVlRONMENTAL IMPACf REPORT is required, but it only needs to analyze the effects that have not yet been addressed_ [ I I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects have been analyzed adequately in an earlier Environmental Impact Report pursuant to applicable standards and have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. By: James M. Kasama, Associate Planner For: The City of Arcadia - Development Services Department c;z ~, Date: July 9, 1998 -3- CEQA Checklist 7195 . . . . . FileNo.: CUP98~17 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects such as the one involved (e.g., the project is not within a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific faetors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will_not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction related as well as operstional impacts. 3. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more, "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the detennination is made, an Environmental Impact Report is required. 4. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must descnbe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section 17 "Earlier Analyses" may be cross-referenced). S. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program Environmental Impact Report, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier ElR or Negative Declaration (Section IS063(c)(3)(D)}. Earlier analyses are discussed in Section 17 at the end of the checklist. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist, references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. -4- CEQA Cbecklist 7195 . . File No.: CUP 98-017 PolentialIy Significanl PolentialIy Unless Less Than Significanl Mitigation Significant No Impact hu:orporaIed Impact Impact [ ] [ ] [ ] [XI [ ] [ ] [ ] [XI [ ] [ ] [ ] [XI [ ] [ ] [ ] [XJ [ ] [ ] [ ] [XI . Would the JIIOIlOS8! result in potentialimpocta involYiDg: 1. LAND USE & PLANNING - Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan dP.OigJUltiQOS or ZlllIing? b) Conflict with applicable environm.nml plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Be <:ompatible with existing land uses in the vi<:inity? d) Affect agriaJltural resources or operations (e.g., llllpa<:ls to soils or farml.nd~. or impa<:ts from inlx>"1p"tible land uses)? e) Disrupt or divide the physical 81T"ngm.... of an established <:ommunity (including a low-income or minority IXI11l1DUlIity)? The proposed cellular in"on.tion Is consistent with the general plan and zoning dpc;ll"otions for the area subject to an approved Conditional Use Permit The construction of the antennae and tenant improvements, and the operation of the proposed jp...n.tion will be subject to all other environm.nlJlI plans or policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over this area. TbeIe are no agricultural resources or operations in the vicinity. 2- POPULA nON & HOUSING - Would the proposal: a) ('lImlllatively exc:eed official regional or loc:al population projections? [ ] [ ] [ ] [XI b) Induce subsIantial growth in an area either din:c:tIy or indiIec:tIy (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of . major infrastructure)? [ ] [ ] [ ] [XJ c) Displace meting Iwusing, especially aft"ordable housing? [ ] [ ] [ ] [XI The proposed cellular j"ct.notionwill not impact the population or h"l1,""8 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS - Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impadS involving: a) Fault rupture? [ ] [ ] [] [XJ b) s..;c:mic ground ohAk-ing? [ ] [ ] [] [XI c) SeIsmic ground failun:, including liquefaction? [ ] [ ] [J [XJ d) Landslides or mudflows? [ ] [ ] [] [XJ e) Erosion, cl1angea in topography or unstable soil <:ondillnns from excavation, gmIing, or fill? [ ] [ ] [] [XI f) Subsidence of the land? [ ] [ ] [] [XI g) Expansive soils? [ ] [ ] [] [XI h) Unique geologit:or physical featun:s? [ ] [ ] [] [XI While this entize region Is subject to the effects of seismit: activity, the subject location has not been determined to be especially &lISCCptible to any of the above geologic problems. 4. WATER - Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absoIption rates, drainage patterns, or the rate and amount of surface nmofl'l [ ] [ ] [ ] [XI . b) Exposure of people or property to waIer relaIlld hazards such as flooding? [ ] [ ] [ ] [XI -s- CEQAChecIdist 7195 . . FileNo.: CUP9S..ol7 Potentially SilJ'ifil'.smt . PotEntially Unless Less Than Would the proposal n:suIt in pnt_tiallmpal:ts involving: Sisnificant Mitigalion Significant No Impact Inl:orpoIated Impact Impact C) Dlscbarge into surliice waters or other alteration of surliice water quality (e.g., temperaluIe, dissolved oxygen, or twbidity)? I ] I ] [ ] (XI d) Changes in the amount of surfal:e water in any water body? [ ) I ] I ] (XI e) Changes in currents, or the course. or direction ofwater movements? [ ) I ) [ ] (XI f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct additions or withdrawals, or through intert:eption of any aquifer by CUIS or excavations or through subetanrial loss of ground water reclwge capability? I ] I ] [ ) (XI g) Altered din:ction or rate of flow of ground water? [ ] I ) [ ] (XI b) Impacts to ground water qua1ity? [ ] I ] [ ] (XI i) Substantial reduction in the amount of ground water otherwise available for public water supplies? [ ) I] I ] (XI The proposed cellular inet.lI.tinn will be in an e,ncting seIf-stoJage facility. The site is not within an inundation area, and there are no proposed site alterations that would result in an incleased potential for any of the above i",pacts. . S. AIR QUALITY - Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standan1 or conlIibute to an existing or projected air quality violation? I ] I ] (J (XI b) Expose sensitive teeeptolS to pollutants? I ) I ) (] (XI c) A1ter air movement, moisture, or temp. or cause any change in climate? ( ) [ ] [] (XI d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) ( ] [] (XI The proposed cellular inslallation and its operation will be subject to local air quality reguIations as .d",ini<lef1:d by the South Coast Air Quality Management District whicb should prevent any impao;lS relative to items (a) and/or (b) above. The installation will not result in alterations to air movement, moisture or temperaluIe, or cause a change in c1i",.... No objectionable odors have been associated with the proposed in.et.llation. 6. TRANSPORTA nON & CIRCULA nON - Would the proposal result in: a) Incn:asecI vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ] ( ] [J (XI b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g..1lmn equipment)? (J I ) [J (XI c) Inadequate emergency ;u:cess or ;u:cess to nearby uses? [ ) ( ) (J (XI d) Insufficient paddng capacity on-site or oft'-site? [ ] ( ) (J (XI e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? [ ) ( ) I] (XI f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting aIternative transportation (e.g., bus tnmouts, bicycle racks)? [ ) I ) I ) (XI g) Rail, wa1eJbome or air traftic l"lp"cts? [ ] I ) [] (XI The proposed cellular installation will not generate any traffic except during conslIuctio.n and by an occasional visit for ltUlinl"""n~ purposes. . -6'- CEQACbccklist 7195 . . . . . File No_: CUP 98-017 Potentially Significant Potentially Unless Less Than Would the proposallllSUlt in potential in1pacts involvins: Sig>>;t;_ Mitigation Sil!J'ifi_' No lmpact lncmporaIed lmpact lmpact 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would !be proposal result ini"lpllcts 10: a) Endangered, thn:atened or rare species or their habitats (including but not limited 10 plants, fish, insects, animals IIIld birds)? I ] I ] [] [XI b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees)? [ ] [ I [] [XI c;) Loc:ally designated D3lII1'lll COIIlIIItIIIities (e.g., oak forest, coaslal habitat, etc.)? I ] [ ] [] [XI d) Wet1andhabitat (e.g., marsh, riparian IIIld vernal pool)? [ ] [ I [I [XI e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? [ ] [ I [] [XI The proposed cellular jp"",lIation will be in an exlsting seIf-storage fac:ility in a commercialfmdustrial area. None of !be above cin:umstances exist. 8. ENERGY & MINERAL RESOURCES - Would !be proposal: a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation plans? [ ] I ] [] [XI b) Use non-renewable resoun:es in a wasteful IIIld inefticieilt manner? [ ] [ ] [] [XI c;)Result in the loss of availability of a known minera1 resource that would be of future value to !be region IIIld !be residents of !be State? [] II [] [XI The proposed projec:t will be required 10 comply with adopted energy c:onservaIion requirements. None of !be above impacts have been llS"lV'iatPd with !be proposed type of use. 9. HAZARDS - Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or re1ease of ha2anIous subslanc:es (including, but not 1imited 10: oil. pesticides, """",;",,1. or radlalion)? I ] [ I I] [XI b) Possible interferenc:e with an emergency response plan or emergency ewcuation plan? I ] I ] [] [XI c;) The creation of any health hazard or potenlial health bazard? I ] [ ] [] [XI d) Exposure of people 10 cYidillg sources of poteDlial health hazards? I] I I [] [XI e) Inaeased fire hazard in areas with f1ammahle brush. grass or trees? I I I I [] [XI The City Bul1dlng Servic:es, IIIld !be City Fire Department have reviewed !be plans for the proposed c:e1lular installation IIIld DO potenlial for any of !be above impacts has been identified No exlsting sources of potential health hazards have been itl.ntifi..! at the subjec:t property. The coDSUuctioo plans for !be in""'l1atiQO will be subject 10 review by !be City Bul1dlng Services IIIld City Fire Department IIIld any potential for any of !be above impacts will be mitigated. 10. NOISE - Would !be proposal result in: a) Int:reases in cYimllg noise levels? [ I I I I] [XI b) Exposure of people 10 severe noise levels? I ] I ] I] [XI The site of !be proposed c:e1lular io<lallation is in an exlsting self-storage fac:ility in a commerciaIIindustrial area IIIld neither of!be above impacts is a~soci9ted with this locatioo or !be proposed use. -7- CEQA Cheddist 7195 . . Would the proposal n:ault in pnt...li.l impw:llllnvolWJs; 11. PUBLIC SERVICES - Would the proposal have an effect UPOD, or result in a need for new or altered govemmeut services in any of the following areas: a) Fireprotec:tion? b) Police protection? c) Schools? d) Maintenance of public filcilities, including roads? e) Other govemmenta1 services? . FileNo.: CUP 98,{l17 Potentially S\gJIlfir.Jllnt Potentially Unless Less Than Signilic:ant MitiptioD Sill"ifiNlnt No Jmpaot InoorporatCd Jmpaot impIIct [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [X] [X] [X] [X] [X] The proposed cellular in_nmon Is c:ousistenI with the pl.nnm uses for the subject area lIDIl will not result in any of the above impacts. 12. VTILITmS & SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or St.h<tonli.1 alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natura1 gas? [ ] [ ] [] [X] b) Communications systems? [ ] [ ] [] [X] c) Local or regional water trP-Htm""t or clistribution filcilities? [ ] [ ] [] [X] II) Sewer or septic tanks? [ ] [ ] [] [X] e) Storm water drainage? [ ] [ ] (] [X] f) Solid waste disposal? [ ] [ ] (] [X] g) Local or regional water supplies? [ ] [ ] [] [X] Improvements to provide any of the above services will be incorporated in this project if ~'Y. It Is not anticipated that any of the above utilities or service systems will be significantly impaded. Nevertheless, the proposed improvements will be reviewed for, 8Dd the developer will be required to provide. if n.........'Y, any new systems or supplies ~""""''Y to mitigllle any such impacts. . 13. AESTHETICS - Would the proposal: a) Affect a sc:enlc vista or scenlt: highway? [ ] [ ] [] [X] b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetics effect? [ ] [ ] [] [X] c) Create light or glare? [ ] [ ] [] [X] The proposed cellular installation will be in an ~oting self-5lonlge filcility, lIDIl will be required to comply with local arcbitectwa1 standards 8Dd illumination limits. Nemby installations include utility poles along the street, electrical tr:m.mi.orion lIDIl c1istnbution lines, 8Dd a simllar c:e1lular iUd.n.tion. The proposed c:e1lular installation will DOt result in any of the above impacts. . 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the proposal: a) Distwb paleontological resowc:es? b) Distwb ~haeological resources? c) Affect historical resources? II) Have the potential to cause a physical cbange which wouId affect unique ethnic cultwal values? .a- [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] CEQA Cbecklist 7/95 [X] [X] [X] [X] . . . . . FileNo.: CUP9~17 Would the proposa1 result in potential impads involvins: Potartia1l . y Significant Potentially Unless Less Thall Signific:anl Mitiplion SIgJ'm'''n' No Impact !ncoIpotated Impact Impact e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses within the potential impact mea? ( ) ( ) [J (X) The proposed cellular in""'lIatioo will be in an existing self-storage facility. NODe of the above n:soun:es bave been identified at the subject area, and noDe of the above impacts bave been s"""C;iot..t with the proposed use. 15. RECREA nON - Would the proposal: a) Increase the dem.nd for nelg/1hnThood or regional pa1ks or other reaeatiooal facilities? [ ) [ ) [J (X) b) Affect existing reaeational opportunities? [ J ( ) [J (X) The plOpuS<d cellular in".lIolioo will be in an ~<liqg"self-storage facility, and the proposed project will not result in any of the above illlp8ctll. 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project bave the potential to degrade the quality of the enviromnent, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self. su....1n1qg levels, threaten to elimln.'" a plant or anima1 community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a ran: or endangered plant or anima1 or eUmitulle important examples of the DIl\ior periods of California histo1y or prel1istoJy'1 ( ) b) Does the project have the potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environm..ntol goals? ( ] ( ) ( ) (X) ( ) [ ) (X) c) Does the project bave impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively collSiderable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incrempnt.1 clfecls of a project are con>;icJ"'lIble when viewed in c:onuec:Iion with the clfects of past projects, the effects of other cunent projects, and the clfects of probable futuze project) [ ) d) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause sub<tonli.1 adverse effects on human beings, either diIectly or indirectly? ( ) [ ) [ ) (X) ( ] [ ) (X) The proposed cellular instaUation will be in an existing self-storage facility in a commercialfmduslrial mea and will not result in any of the above impacts. An excessive proliferation of similar installations could result in a long-term, and/or cumulatively considerable impact. but this is only the second such proposal in the subject area, and there Is no indication that theIe is a high """,ond for additional wa.nolions. 17. EARLIER ANALYSES No earlier ana1yses, and no additional dO"nm""" were referenced pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA proc 5 :5 to analyze the proposal. .9- CEQA Chedclisl 7/95 i . FileNo..W ~ r -0\ \ CITY OF ARCADIA 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE ARCADIA, CA 91007 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM Date Filed: ~-Z'l-er8 General Information . 1. Applicant's Name: AirTouch Cellular Address: 3 Park Plaza, Irvine, CA 9.2713-9.707 2. Property Address (Location): 12340 Lower Azusa Road 8545-024-003 Assessor's Number: 3. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: Nat D. Pendleton Site Development Manager'c/o AirTouch Cellular POB-( "'01 3 Park Plaza, 6th Floor, Irvine, CA 92713-9707 ('1'1'1) ZZZ -f;Z7b 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: City CUP approval,City Building Permit & Federal Communications Commission approval. 5. Zone Classification: M-2 Heavy Manufacturing 6. General Plan Designation: Industrial Project Description 7. Proposed use of site (project description): Installation of Wireless Telecommunications transceive cell site in the existing public storrage facility to include; 45 ft. high 10. .1. 12. 13. monopole with (21) cellular directional antennas and (3) microwave antennas with 600 sq. ft. equipment room in public storage building leased space. 8. Site size: 2.9 acres 9. Square footage per building: Number of floors of construction: NA NA Amount of off-street parking provided: 11 Standard spaces existing and not changed. Proposed scheduling of project: CODlitruCltion in 4th Otr 1998. 45 day duration Anticipated incremental development: None . . If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household sizes expected: NA , 14. . 15. If commercial, indicate the type, i.e. neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities, hours of operation: NA 16. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities: Facility will be unmanned, opperate 24 hours per day, 365 days per year and require only one visit per month by one maintenance technician. 17. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project: NA 18. If the project involves a variance, conditional use permit or zoning application, state this and indicate clearly why the application is required: . CotIIl"1un"ications Eauipment FA.,..;l;tip~ .qyp P&;Iorn\;"''''ol''l ofn !'3r1)7 7...1"'10. ~.1'-r.,.b. !':)~ "3pprQu....g CUP (Sec. 9275.1.11) and are considered aDorDriate installations in an M-J znnp Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO 19. Change in existing features.of any hiIls, or substantial alteratin of ground contours. o 20. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. o 21. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. o o o 22. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 23. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. . -2- ~ I>> ~ CA W E.I.R. 3/95 . . _4. 25. 26. 27. 28. 29. 30. . . YES NO 32. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. o Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. o o o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ia ra Describe (on a separate sheet) the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Describe (on a separate sheet) the surrounding properties, including information on plants, animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land uses (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-backs, rear yards, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification _1. Is site on filled land or on any slopes of 10 percent or more. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.). o I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my wledge d belief. d, ~rJ . (99 fJ Date / . Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). o Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. o Environmental Setting -3- E.I.R. 3/95 . . . . . May 19, 1998 Environmental Questionnaire Page #3, Question # 31 Project Site Characteristics The site is currently developed with a Self Storage Facility, and is zoned M-2.There are seven separate 12 ft high storage buildings on the site totaling approximately 75,000 sq. ft. The remainder of the 2.9 acre site is paved, with the exception of landscaped areas located at the main entrance to the facility and along the 900 foot, 16 ft. wide frontage strip bordering Lower Azusa Road on the north side of the site. Landscaping in the aforementioned areas consists. of lawn, low shrubs and some 20 ft. high trees. Topography of the site is flat and the soil is stable. The plants at the site appear healthy with no distress signs that would indicate adverse environmental conditions or soil contamination. No animal life is evident on the areas adjacent to the site. A survey of the adjacent property and associated public records for the area reveals that there are not any evident historical, cultural or scenic aspects to consider at this site. . . . . . May 19, 1998 Environmental Questionnaire Page #3, Question # 32 Surrounding Property Characteristics The proposed AirTouch lease site at 12340 Lower AzusaRoad is located within the existing 2.9 acre Public Storage property, bordered on the north by Lower Azusa Road beyond which is an M-2 zoned area occupied by a quarry pit in the City of Arcadia. Located immediately to the south of the AirTouch lease site is a vacant M-2 Zoned property which extends for 780 ft. to the south beyond which is Single Family Residential in the City of El Monte. To the East of the proposed site is the San Gabriel River and agricultural use in the City of Irwindale. To the west of the proposed AirTouch site is a quarry pit zoned M-2 in the City of Arcadia. The area to the north west of the site has a row of mature trees 20 ft. to 30 ft. high trees and shrubs located along the north side of Lower Azusa Road screening the quarry pit. Adjacent vacant areas to the site on the south, east and west area are partially covered with native grasses and small native bushes and plants. The plants and grasses in the areas adjacent to the site appear healthy with no distress signs that would-indicate adverse environmental conditions or soil contamination. No animal,life is evident immediately adjacent to the site. A survey of the adjacent property and associated public records for the area reveals that there are not any evident historical, cultural or scenic aspects to consider on the areas adjacentto this site. . . . . . May IS. 1998 Air'D.'ouch Cellular Proposed Gravel Pits Cell Site, 12340 lLower Azusa Rd. " '- , "" \ , /\ /' \ \ ;...,~, ~ \ \ ..... i', ,- West View n-om Lower Amsa Rood M North East View n-om Lower Amsa Road . . . . . May 18, 1998 AirTouch Cellular Proposed Gravel Pits Cell Site, 12340 Lower Azusa Rd. _; u_ .. I ! I ., l Soulb West View from Lo..... Amsa Road '.... -.I- t.--( -.'- , "---1 North East View from Lower Azusa Road