The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1377 (2) PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 1377 . A RESOLUTION GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 88. 012 TO OPERATE A RESTAURANT AT 181 COLORADO PLACE: WHEREAS, on May 2, 1988 an application was filed by Ray F. Sibille to operate a restaurant, Planning Department Case NO. C.U.P. 88-012, on property commonly known as 181 Colorado Place, more particularly described as follows: SEE EXlllBIT "A" . WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on June 14, 1988, at which time all interested persons were given full opportunity t6 be heard. and to present evidence; NOW, THERFORE, THE PLANN:ING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA HEREBY RESOL YES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the factual data submitted by the Planning Department in the attached report is true and correct. Section 2. This Commission finds: 1. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit wiII not be detrimental to the pl,lblic health or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or vicinity. 2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is proper use for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized. 3. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use. All yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking, loading, landscaping and other features are adequate to adjust said use with .the land and uses in the neighborhood. 4. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use. S. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit wiII not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan. . 1377 - 1 . \ 6. That the use applied for will not have a substantial adverse impact on the environment. Section 3. That for the foregoing reasons this Commission grants a Conditional Use Permit operate a restaurant subject to the following conditions: 1. Except for gratuity, valet parking shall be provided free to all patrons during all business hours. Signsshall be posted informing the public of free valet parking. The signs' number, location. size, color and print shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Department. Also. a tandem parking plan for the valet parking shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval. 2. If free valet parking IS not possible per condition number I, the applicant shall provide 12 additional parking spaces per A.M.C. Section 9269.6. Before any parking spaces are used on a site other than 181 Colorado Place a revision to Conditional Use Permit 88-012 shall be filed to include the additional site. The appropriate plans, fees and application shaIl be filed. Note that either the free valet parking or the covenant per A.M.C. Section 9269.6.6 shaIl be completed prior to the opening of the restaurant. 3. The following conditions from the Department of Public Works shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the Director of Public Works. A. Remove nonconforming curb, gutter and drive apron on Colorado Place adjacent to San Juan Drive. B. Construct P.C.C. curb, gutter and driveway apron according to Arcadia Standard Drawing No. S-Il. C Plant parkway trees at locations determined by the Director of Public Works per City of Arcadia Standard S-I3. D. Remove and replace deficient or damag~d curb. gutter or sidewalk. E. AII survey monuments, centerline ties and survey reference points shall be protected in place or re- established where disturbed. This work will be the 1377 . . . - 2- , . responsibility of the permittee and shaH be at the . , permittee s expense. 4. Fire protection shaH be provided to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. This shaH include upgrading the fire hydrant, a ,supervised central station fire alarm system and an automatic fire suppression system in the kitchen over cooking surfaces. Hydrant upgrade and fire alarm system may be omitted if building is fuIly fire sprinkled. 5. Water service shaIl conform to the Uniform Plumbing Code and new water service shaIl be instaHed by the Arcadia Water Division upon the request and payment of fees by the developer. 6. Design Review approval shaH be obtained from the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency prior to issuance of any building permits. 7. Any new walls or fences shall be of decorative block or finished with stucco. This shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Department. g, The entrance canopy along San Juan Drive shaH be eliminated unless approval can be obtained from the Public Works Department. 9. Final site plan shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Department. AH wheel stops of parking spaces adjacent to a landscaped area shaIl be eliminated and said landscaped area extended with 6" high continuous concrete curbing, parking spaces 1 through 5 shaIl be shortened to provide additional landscaping and paving materials that are textured and color shall be used at th.e entrance of each driveway and throughout the parking 101. 10. Final landscape plan shall be subject to the approval of the Planning Department. II. Architectural Design Review applications will be required for the entrance canopy and all signs. 12. Hours of operation for the restaurant and cocktail lounge shaH be limited to 11 :00 a.m. to 12:00 midnight. 13. That a modification be granted for 9 compact spaces in lieu fo 7 maximum. ~,- . . 1377 - 3 - '. i . 14. The subject site shall be maintained as per the plans on file in the Planning Department. 15. That C.U.P. 88-012 shall not take effect until the owner and applicant have executed a form available at the Planning Department indicating awareness and acceptance of the conditions of approval. 16. Noncompliance with the provisions and conditions of this Conditional Use Permit shall constitute grounds for the immediate suspension or revocation of said permit. Section 4. The decision, findings and conditions contained in this Resolution reflect the Commission's action of June 14, 1988 and the following vote: AYES: Commissioners NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Amato Section 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause a copy to .be forwarded to the City Council of the City of Arcadia. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 28th day of June, 1988 by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Amato, Hedlund, Papay, Szany NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioner Clark, Hedlund, Papay, Szany . CI'~ Chairman, Planni City of Arcadia ission A TrEST: !tnJj/(~uLal~ Secretary, Planning Commission City of Arcadia . 1377 -4 - \ . '. . . \';.'.t?t:'l Our No. 334359-6 EXHIBIT "A" That portion of Lot 1, Tract No. 949, in the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as shown on map recorded in Book 17 Page 13 of Maps, In the office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows: Beginning at the most Southerly corner'of Lot 33, Tract No. 13154 as shown on map recorded in Book 264 Pages 3 and 4 of said Maps; thence South 460 18' 52" West 88.30 feet to the true point of beginning; thence continuing South 460 18' 52" West 173.87 feet to the point of intersection with the Northeasterly line of Colorado Place (formerly Colorado Street). 80,00 feet in width, as the same is described in Deed to the said City of Arcadia recorded i/1 300k 9396 Page 145 of Official Records in the office of said County Recordt!r; thence Northwesterly along said Northeasterly line of Colorado Place, 137.58 feet, more or less, to the Southerly terminus of that certain curve in the Southeasterly line of San Juan Drive shown on map I)f T"dct No. 14745 recorded in Book. 304 Pages 34 and 35 of Maps, in said off1ca of the CO'Jnty Recorder' as being concave Easterly and having a radius of 20.00 feet~ thence Northeasterly along said curve an arc distance of 31.42 feet; thencp. North S~O 26' 44" East 203.00 feet along the Southeasterly line of San Juan Drive as shown on said map of Tract No. 14745 to the intersection with a line which Is parallel with the Westerly line of said '.ot 33, Tract No. 13154, and whJch passes through the true point of beginning; thence South 60 07' 35" East 129.80 feet along said parallel lfne to the true point of beginning. IS1:lIl"O ACltl'lt for: t ;.~. t ~ 0 ,- ~ ~ ~: ~c ~ " ~ 2l:l ,., . ~.~ 0 'P.JZ ~ ~ <:: ... ~ ~ ~ R-3 - .- . " .' . r.. .. ~ '. ~ "'0::- @ ~ .. Ct..l..\roRU \A J Q - T,",O~eR.Ul; t:~ ~~:~ CO ~RUJ,)fRO .~ JI7.x;G\A.naJ . 00 ("'0 ~ . "Va o \)~. ., ,:?, 0~~1'" \ ~ ~'. ,. ~~ ;A.P' ~ " ~. '?' ~, !''', )' ~, .._. ,t/ ~11. ..z ,)' " \. ~ ,"'- . "'....~ ~.;-- ~ , , . ~TA A~l\TA. PAR}( ~ ~ '?J - ~TOQ..f QT'ICt.. e:tnu.. . ~ AND USE AND ZONING C.U. P.. 91o-00f.. SCALe: /....[00' ., ~ I $: +++ I t= -t: - ~ t::t I ~ :i:t:t: ~ -++ .,....,... -.,... ~ i . ..-:- lal' .. T '(...... - ~- S~ Cj) <;> i:l t.;:R:' I 2 8.EVATlONS 'w SAN .AJAH DRIVE ~ .----.-L"-- ,I :,:_- _./ . '{ . ..----;:=.;:::, J :7==:-- UJ r .. _ -"" i I t. ~ ~ - n \ 1 I 1 I \,:~:-~. ~ _.\ n 111"111111 t t; III , II 1111111: 111'; ," \ I ~I jlll,1t :"dll'J \~ t I I' 11;1"')11,11' i \ · r,' 1!1,!I!il!1 .,.~ \ J i f'!i\ €:"l "~\: \ \ \. 1.- ( :, I I . I " I! ~:~;a~r ", ~ ~ I \ ,,'" , 5\ \ < , -- , ,.-- ~-, ~- .. ( D . . '. , I I . , . - . ~ If f~~. T-':~:.. I - ....-.- .c-___..... :-- "......... . . - .--- .-- .-- . - " .1....... 0.. .J. ....... c-. -- -- -- .....-..;;;;;:---;;-...-.. ...-.-' "-'~~'--"7 . .. . 'V'""t . I, . .';/ -,// , o .. ,./ ~......-''''' 'r______ ':---:-..... . \:................. ". ........-:: \V bla... ....- un ...... ,"'.... I ,I 0/ ~I/ .:::::;~/ ~!." ~.'l ,..~.' ~-~I I: --- - - . -- . I ;..... - - . -- . --. - - . -. . .' .' '.~. " . .. . ".- '. . -.. ...-_.__.._._~.",.._".-_.._.-.-_..-..... . " - - ... ~ m'l 11:. ::i lei - .. IlIlAM ---. A,1 . . . me No" C.U.P. 96-002 CITY OF ARCADIA 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE ARCADIA, CA 91007 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT NEGATIVE DECLARATION A. Title and Desc:ription of Project: Conditional Use Permit No. 96-002 A conditional use permit with related parking and building setback modifications to add a proposed 640 sq.fl, patio dining area to an existing restaurant. B. Location of Project: 181 Colorado Place, Arcadia, CA C Name of Applicant or Sponsor: Gary 1.. Barringer. (dba: Peppers Mexican Grill & Cantina) . D. Finding: This project will have no significant effect upon the environment within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 for the reasons set forth in the attached Initial Study. E. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially significant effects: Date: Date Posted: ~L ~.l1tL March V, 1996 March 27, 1996 Planning Services Manager .. . . File No.: C.U.P. 96-Oln CITY OF ARCADIA 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE ARCADIA. CA 91007 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM "I. Project Title: Conditional Use Permit No. 96-002 2 Project Address: 181 Colorado Place, Arcadia, California 91007 3. Project Sponsor's Name. Address and Telephone Number: Gary L Barringer (dba: Peppers Mexican Grill & Cantina) 181 Colorado Place, Arcadia, California 91007 (818) 446-5529 4. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Arcadia, 240 West Huntington Drive, Arcadia, California 91007 S. Contact Person and Phone Number: Corkran W. Nicholson 6. General Plan Desiguation: Commercial 7. Zone Oassification: C-2 EJ.R. Cht'Ck1ist 7/95 -1- , F'doNo.: C.U.P.96-002 8. Desaiption of Project (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its . implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.) A conditional use permit with related parking and building setback modifications to add a proposed 640 sq.ft., patio dining area to an existing restaurant. 9. Other public agencies whose approval is required. (e.g., permits, financing approval, or participation agreement.) Building Section, Fire Deparbnent. Police, Engineering, Economic Development ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,. involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. . Q Land Use & Planning Q Transportation/Circulation Q Population & Housing Q Biological Resources Q Geological Problems Q Energy & Mineral Resources Q Water Q Hazards ~ Air Quality Q Noise lJ Mandatory Findings of Signficance Q Public Services Q Utilities & Service Systems Q Aesthetics Q Cultural Resources Q Recreation . -2- E.I.R. Cheddist 7./95 , "'l Fi16 No.: C.U.P.96-002 . DETERMINATION (To be comp_ by "'" lad A....,..) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the ./ environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be' prepared. ri I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [J . I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACf REPORT is required. [J I find that the proposed projectMA Y have a significant effect(s) on the environment, \;Jut aUeast one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been.addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a .pob?ntially significant impact" or .potentially significant unless mitigated." mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACf REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. [J 1 find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures thatQr:~n~~prop pr~ ~/~/fV [J Signature Date I C! Or ArlAkL Printed Name For . E.I.R. Cbeddist 7/95 " .3- . 1. . . F'~. No.: C.U.P. ~ EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACfS: A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequall!.1y supported by the informationsources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2 AU answers must take account of the whole action involved. including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct;. and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropiriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. H there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" entires when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures. and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from SectionXVll. "ealier Analyses." may be cross-referenced.) 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program Em. or other CEQA process. an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the end of the checklist. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Refemce to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. E.l.R. Checklist 7/95 -4- , . . . c) Seismic ground failure, including liquefactiQ1l? ( ) d) Landslidesormudflows? ( ) e) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable soil conditions from excavation, grading, or fill? ( ) f) Subsidence of the land? ( ) g) Expansive soils? ( ) h) Unique geologic or physical features? ( ) 4. WATER Would the proposal result in: a ) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns or the rate and amount of surface runoff? ( ) b) Exposure of people or property to water related hazards such as flooding? ( ) c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration of surface water quality (e.g. temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? ( ) d) Changes in the amount.of surface water in any water body? ( ) e) Changes in <:mrenls, or the course or direction of water movements? ( ) f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either through direct. additions or withdrawals, or through interceptiQ1l of any aquifer by cuts or excavations or through substantial loss of ground water recharge capability? ( ) g) Altered direction or rate of flow of ground water? ( ) h ) Impacts to ground water quality? ( '. Potentially Significant Impact o o o o o o o o o o o o o o -6- Po,,,ntially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated o o o o o o o o o o o o o o Less Than Significant Impact o 0, o o o .0 o o o o o o o o -. No Impact ~ r/ r:I rI rI r/ ;j I , ~ ~ uI r/ / E.I.R. Checklist 7/95 1'0t~"l1aUy Sif, icant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact . cI i) Substantial reduction in the amount of C1 C1 C1 ground water otherwise available for public water supplies? ( ) 5. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: ~ a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute C1 C1 Q to an existing or projected air quality violation? ( ) b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) C1 C1 C1 r:I c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature C1 C1 C1 ~ or cause any change in climate? ( ) / d) Create objeCtionable odors? ( ) C1 C1 C1 6. TRANSPORT A TION/CIRCULA nON . Would the proposal result in: ~ a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( ) C1 C1 C1 b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. C1 C1 C1 r/ sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g. fann equipment)? ( ) c) Inadequate emergency access or access to C1 C1 C1 ~ nearby uses? ( ) / d) Insufficient parking capacity on"site. or C1 C1 C1 off.site? ( ) e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or C1 C1 C1 , bicyclists? ( ) 01 f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting C1 lJ lJ alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? ( ) , g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? ( ) lJ lJ lJ . E.I.R. Checklist 7/95 -7. , , Pol 'ially Si~~,cant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact . d) Exposure of people to existing sources of IJ IJ IJ r/ potential health hazards? ( ) e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable IJ IJ IJ r/ brush, grass, or trees? ( ) 10. NOISE Would the proposal result in: rI 'a) Increases in existing noise levels? ( ) IJ IJ IJ b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? ( ) IJ IJ IJ wi 11. PUBLIC SERVICES Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered govemment services in any of the following areas: ~ a) Fire protection? ( ) IJ IJ IJ . b) Police protection? ( IJ IJ IJ r./ Schools? ( IJ IJ IJ c) d) Maintenance of public facilities, including IJ. IJ IJ r/ roads? ( ) rI e) Other governmental services? ( IJ IJ IJ 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS Would the proposal result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: I a) Power or natural gas? ( ) IJ IJ IJ .. , b) Communications systems? ( ) IJ IJ IJ r/ c) Local or regional water treatinent or IJ IJ IJ distribution facilities? ( ) , d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( ) IJ IJ IJ . e) Storm water drainage? ( IJ IJ IJ rI .' E.I.R. Checklist 7/95 -9- , - ------ Po' 'ially Signuicant Potentially Unless Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporated Impact Impact . f) Solid waste disposal? ( ) Q Q , Q g) Local or regional water supplies? ( ) Q Q Q r/ 13. AESTHETICS Would the proposal: a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) Q Q Q ri b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetics Q Q Q r:I effect? ( ) ...' rI c) Create light or glare? ( ) Q Q Q 14. CULTURAL RESOURCES Would the proposal: a) Disturb paleontological resources? ( ) Q Q Q ~ - b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) Q Q Q r:i . c) Affect historical resources? ( ) Q Q Q rI d) Have the potential to cause a physical change Q. Q Q cI which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? ( ) e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses Q Q Q ~ within the potential impact area? ( ) 15. RECREATION Would the proposal: a) Increase.the demand for neighborhood or Q Q Q d regional parks or other recreational facilities? ( ) / b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? ( ) Q Q Q . E.I.R. Checklist 7/95 -10- . E.1.R. Checklist 7/95 -11- ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM . 1. LAND USE PLANNING a-e 1. The proposed conditional use pennit is a pennit process to establish specific conditions for the consideration of allowing the addition of a 640 sq. ft., patio dining area to an existing restaUrant within the City of Arcadia. Such a pennit does not affect existing land uses or general plan designations. 2. POPULATION AND HOUSING a-c: The proposed conditional use pennit isa pennit process to establish specific conditions for the consideration of allowing the addition of a 640 sq.ft., patio dining area to an existing restaurant within the City of Arcadia. Such a pennit does not affect existillg populations or housing. 3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS . a-h The proposed conditional use pennit is a pennit process to establish specific conditions for the consideration of allowing the addition of a 640 sq.ft., patio dining area to an existing restaUrant within the City of Arcadia. Such a pennit will not expose people to any geologic or seismic problems. 4. WATER a-i The proposed conditional use pennit is a pennit process to establish specific conditions for the consideration of allowing the addition of a 640 sq.ft., patio dining area to an existing restaurant within the City of Arcadia. Any conditional use pennit approval as a result of this enabling legislation would have to comply with all Municipal Code standards and be subject to review by the appropriate agencies. S. AIR QUALITY a-d The proposed conditional use pennit is a pennit process to establish specific conditions for the consideration of allowing the addition of a 640 sq.ft., patio dining area to an existing restaurant within the City of Arcadia. Any conditional use pennit approval as a result of this enabling legislation would have to comply with all Municipal Code standards and be subject to review by the appropriate agencies. . 1 , . . 6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION ~g . The proposed conditional use permit is a permit process to estabiish specific conditions for the consideration of allowing the addition of a 640 sq.ft., patio dining area to an existing restaurant within the City of Arcadia Any conditional use pennit approval as a result of this enabling legislation would have to comply with aI) Municipal Code standards and be subject to review by the appropriate agencies. Also, random on-site parking counts have been provided by the applicant to show that there will be adequate on-site parking for the proposed use. 7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES a-c: The proposed conditional use pennit is a pennitprocess to establish specific coO:ditions for the consideration of allowing the addition of a 640 sq.ft., patio dining area to an existing restaurant within the City of Arcadia. Any conditional use pennit approval as a result of this enabling legislation would have to comply with all Municipal Code standards and be subjel;:t to review by the appropriate agencies. 8. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES . a-c: The proposed conditional use permit is a permit process to establish specific conditions for the consideration of allowing the addition of a 640 sq.ft., patio dining area to an existing restaurant within the City of Arcadia. Any conditional use permit approval as a result of this enabling legislation would have to comply with all Municipal Code standards and be subject to review by the appropriate agencies. 9. HAZARDS a-e The proposed conditional use permit is a pennit process to establish specific conditions for the consideration of allowing the addition of a 640 sq.ft., patio dining area to an existing restaurant within the City of Arcadia Any conditional usepennit approval as a result of this enabling legislation would have to comply with all Municipal Code standards and be subject to review by the appropriate agencies. 10. NOISE . aandb The proposed conditional use permit is a permit process to establish specific conditions for the consideration of allowing the addition of a 640 sq.ft., patio dining area to an existing restaurant within the City of Arcadia. Any conditional use penn it 2 , . . . -. approval as a result of this enabling legislation would have to comply with all : Municipal Code standards and be subject to review by the appropriate agencies. 11. PUBLIC SERVICES a-e The proposed conditional use permit is a permit process to establish specific conditions for the consideration of allowing the addition of a 640 sq.ft., patio dining area to an existing restaurant within the City of Arcadia. Arty conditional use permit approval as a result of this enabling legislation would have to comply with all Municipal Code standards and be subject to review by the appropriate agencies. 12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS a-g The proposed conditional use permit is a permit process to establish specific conditions for the consideration of allowing the addition of a 640 sq.ft., patio dining area to an existing restaurant within the City of Arcadia. Arty conditional use permit approval as a result of this enabling legislation would have to comply with all Municipal Code standards and be subject to review by the appropriate agencies. 13. AESTHETICS a-c The proposed conditional use permit is a permit process to establish specific conditions for the consideration of allowing the addition of a 640 sq.ft., patio dining area to an existing restaurant within the City of Arcadia. Arty conditional use permit approval as a result of this enabling legislation would have to comply with all Municipal Code standards and be subject to review by the appropriate agencies. 14. CULTURALRESOURCES .' a-e The proposed conditional use permit is a permit process to establish specific conditions for the consideration of allowing the addition of a 640 sq.ft., patio dining area to an existing restaurant within the City of Arcadia. Arty conditional use permit approval as a result of this enabling legislation would have to comply with all Municipal Code standards and be subject to review by the appropriate agencies. 15. RECREATION a-b The proposed conditional use permit is a permit process to establish specific conditions for the consideration of allowing the addition of a 640 sq. ft., patio dining area to an existing restaurant within the City of Arcadia. Arty conditional use permit 3 , .' ., . approval lB a result of this enabling.legislation would have to comply with all Municipal Code standards and be subject to review by the appropriate agencies. 16. MANDATORY FINDINGS a-d The proposed conditional use permit is a permit process to establish specific conditions for the consideration of allowing the addition of a 640 sq.ft., patio dining area to an existing restaurant within the City of Arcadia. Any conditional use permit approval as a result of this enabling legislation would have to comply with all Municipal Code standards and be subject to review by the appropriate agencies. . . 4 , .. ". . -~ ~.u.p. "lD- aL. FileNo. CITY OF ARCADIA 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE ARCADIA, CA 91007 ENVIRONMENT At INFORMATION FORM Date Filed: General Information 1. Applicant's Name: Gary Barringer Address: PEPPERS. 181 Colorado Place 2. Property Address (Location): above fl(~; - Assessor's Number: ,?t7t> - r77..C:. Vd- ~ o/,r- -c;//- 3. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: Gary Barrinqer, above address, ll18-446-5529 4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: n.a. 5. Zone Oassification: C-2 6. General Plan Designation: COIl\lllercial Proiect Oescriotion 7. Proposed use of site (project description): addition of 640-square-foot (plus or minus) outside patio dining area in portions of existing parking area and landscaped area. 8. 9. 10. 11. . 12 13. Site size: 29,000- square- feet (plus or minus) Square fpotage per building: 5, 200-square-feet Number of floors of construction: one Amount of off-street parking provided: 38 spaces two-week construction ~eriod to Proposed scheduling of project: cOIl\lllence upon agency approval Anticipated incremental development n . a . . . . ... 14.. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type. of household sizes expected: n.a. 15. If commercial, indicate the type, i.e. neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities, hours of operation: C-2 restaurant; 5,200 square feet qross which includes kitchen. storage, offices and pUblic areas; outside truck area; lunch and canner served 16. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities: n.a. 17. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loadillg facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project: n.a_ 18. If the project involves a variance, conditional use permit or zoning application, state- this and indicate clearly why the application is required: CUP required to add outside patio dininq for more than 12 people Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary). YES NO o 19. Change in existing features of any hills, or substantial alteratf of ground contours. o [J 20. Change in scenic Views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads. o [) 21. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. o o o &:I lil iii 22. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. 23. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. E.I.R. 3/95 -2- , . . . 1 YES NO 24. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage patterns. CI I!l 25. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. CI iii CI iii CI liI 26. Is site on filled land or on any slopes of 10 percent or more. 27. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. 28. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.). CI Iil 29. Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.). . . " CI Iil 30. Relationship to a larger pr9ject or series of projects, Environmental Settine a Iil Describe (on a separate sheet) the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, any cultural; historical or scenic aspects, any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 32. Describe (on a separate sheet) the surrounding properties, including information on plants, animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land uses (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-backs, rear yards, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 31. Certification I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. March 21. 1996 Date Signature E.l.R. 3/95 .-3- ,