HomeMy WebLinkAbout1687
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 1687
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. CUP 2003-001 AND RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. ADR 2002-057 TO
EXPAND AND CONVERT AN EXISTING SERVICE STATION INTO A
24-HOUR FUELING STATION WITH EIGHT (8) FUELING
POSITIONS, A 3,720 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING WITH 2,000
SQUARE FEET OF CONVENIENCE MART SALES AREA WITH
BEER AND WINE SALES FOR OFF-SITE CONSUMPTION AT 102
EAST HUNTINGTON DRIVE.
WHEREAS, on December 2, 2002, a Conditional Use Permit application was
filed by Sirius, LLC to expand and convert an existing service station into a 24-hour
fueling station with eight (8) fueling positions, a 3,720 square foot building with 2,000
square feet of convenience mart sales area with beer and wine sales for off-site
consumption; Development Services Department Case Nos. CUP 2003-001 and
ADR 2002-057, at 102 East Huntington Drive, more particularly described in the
attached Exhibit "A"; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on January 14, 2003, at which time all
interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the factual data submitted by the Development
Services Department in the attached reports dated January 14, 2003 are true and
correct.
SECTION 2. This Commission finds:
1. That the granting of the Conditional. Use Permit will not be detrimental to
the public health or welfare, nor injurious to the property or improvements in the zone
or vicinity.
2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is properly one for which
a Conditional Use Permit is authorized.
3. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate said use, and all yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking, loading,
.
.
.
landscaping and other features required to adjust said use with the land and uses in
the neighborhood.
4. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and
pavement type to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use.
5. That the subject property is designated for commercial use in the General
Plan, that the proposed use is consistent with that designation, and that the granting
of the Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the comprehensive general
plan.
6. That the evaluation of the environmental impacts as set forth in the Initial
Study is appropriate and that the project will have no significant effect upon the
environment within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970,
and, when considering the project as a whole, there was no evidence before the City
that the proposed project would have any potentially adverse effect on wildlife
resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends, and therefore, a Negative
Declaration was adopted.
SECTION 3. That for the foregoing reasons this Commission grants
Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 2003-001 and recommends approval of
Architectural Design Review No. ADR 2002-057 to expand and convert an existing
service station into a 24-hour fueling station with eight (8) fueling positions. a 3.720
square foot building with 2,000 square feet of convenience mart sales area with beer
and wine sales for off-site consumption at 102 East Huntington Drive, subject to the
following conditions:
1. The automobile fueling station and the site shall be improved, operated
and maintained in manners that are consistent with the proposal and plans submitted
and conditionally approved for CUP 03-001, including compliance with all comments,
recommendations, and requirements received from the various City Departments,
subject to the satisfaction of the Directors of said Departments.
2. If it is determined to be necessary, on the basis of complaints from
surrounding residents and businesses, the Community Development Administrator
may require a noticed public hearing, to be paid for by the owner and/or operator of
the automobile fueling station, for the consideration of imposing restrictions on the
-2-
1687
.
.
.
business hours and/or the sale of beer and wine, and/or to add other site
improvements to address the specific complaints.
3. Detailed landscaping and irrigation plans are to be submitted to the
Development Services Department and are subject to approval by the Community
Development Administrator. These plans will be reviewed by the City's Landscape
Architect, at the applicant's expense, and shall comply with their recommendations,
subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Administrator.
4. The accenting of the driveways (I.e., pavers) shall be provided subject to
the approval of the Community Development Administrator.
5. A monument sign with a maximum height of six feet shall be provided in
lieu of the existing pole sign. The monument sign shall be submitted for a separate
Architectural Design Review, and is subject to approval by the Community
Development Administrator. Said sign shall be designed in accordance with the
City's Sign Design Guidelines.
6. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Arcadia and its officers, employees, and agents from and against any claim, action,
or proceeding against the City of Arcadia, its officers, employees or agents to attack,
set aside, void, or annul any approval or condition of approval of the City of Arcadia
concerning this project and/or land use decision, including but not limited to any
approval or condition of approval of the City Council, Planning Commission, or City
Staff, which action is brought within the time period provided for in Government Code
Section 66499.37 or other provision of law applicable to this project or decision. The
City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding concerning
the project and/or land use decision and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense
of the matter. The City reserves the right, at its own option, to choose its own
attorney to represent the City, its officers, employees, and agents in the defense of
the matter.
7. Noncompliance with the plans, provisions, requirements of various City
departments, and the conditions of approval for CUP 03-001 shall be grounds for
immediate suspension and/or revocation of any approvals, which shall result in
suspension of construction and/or operation of the automobile fueling station.
-3-
1687
.
.
.
8. Approval of CUP 03-001 shall not take effect until the property owner;
applicant and applicant's agent have executed and filed the Acceptance Form
available from the Development Services Department to indicate awareness and
acceptance of the conditions of approval.
SECTION 4. The decision, findings, and conditions of approval
contained in this Resolution reflect the Planning Commission's action of January 14,
2003 to grant Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 2003-001 and recommend approval
of Architectural Design Review No. ADR 2002-057, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Baderian, Hsu, Lucas, Wen and Olson
NOES: None
SECTION 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that this Resolution No. 1687 was adopted at a regular
meeting of the Planning Commission held on January 28, 2003, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
Commissioners Baderian, Hsu, Lucas, Wen and Olson
None
W'k', FQ)
Chairman, Planning Commission
City of Arcadia
...--'
Secretary, Planning
City of Arcadia
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~
~r~
Stephen P. Deitsch, City Attorney
City of Arcadia
-4-
1687
.
.
.
EXHIBIT 'A'
Legal Description -102 East Huntington Drive
Lots '33, 34, 35 and 36 in Block 72, as shown on the map of part of Arcadia, n the
City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as per map recorded in
Book 15, Page{s) 89 and 90, Miscellaneous Recorqs of Said County.
Excepting the northerly 10 feet of the easterly 90 feet of the westerly 100 feet of Lot
35, conveyed to the City of Arcadia, by Document #526 recorded September 30,
1935 in Book 13729, Page 22 of Official Records.
Also excepting the northerly 15 feet of Lot 33 and the northerly 15 feet of the easterly
45 feet of said Lot 36, conveyed to the City of Arcadia by Document #525 recorded
September 30, 1935 in Book 13729, Page 22 of Official Records.
Also excepting the westerly 10 feet of Lots 34, 35 and 36, conveyed to the City of
Arcadia by Document #139; recorded 3/18/27 in Book 6648, Page 72 of Official
Records.
Also excepting the easterly 15 feet of Lot 33 measured along Huntington Drive.
EXHIBIT 'A'
-5-
1687
.
.
.
I
.
STAFF REPORT
Development Services Department
January 14, 2003
TO: Arcadia City Planning Commission
FROM: Donna L. Butler, Community Development Administrator
By: James M. Kasama, Senior Planner
SUBJECT: CUP 03-001 and ADR 02-057 for Huntington Chevron at 102 East
Huntington Drive to convert and expand the service building into a
convenience mart.
SUMMARY
Conditional Use Permit Application No. CUP 03-001 and Architectural Design
Review No. ADR 02-057 were submitted by Sirius, LLC and their architect, Mr. Leon
E. Felus. The proposal is to convert the existing automobile service station at 102
East Huntington Drive into a 24-hour automobile fueling station by expanding and
converting the service building into a convenience mart. The convenience mart
building will have a total of 3,720 square feet with a sales floor area of 2,000 square
feet and will include the sale of beer and wine for off-site consumption. The existing
fuel pump canopy will be replaced with a wider canopy to fully cover the fuel pump
islands and will be shaped to match the convenience mart.
The Development Services Department is recommending approval of the proposed
automobile fueling station subject to the conditions in this staff report.
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Sirius, LLC and Leon E. Fetus, Architect
LOCATION:
REQUEST:
102 East Huntington Drive
A Conditional Use Permit and Architectural Design Review to:
1. Expand and convert an existing automobile service building into
a 3,720 square foot convenience mart with 2,000 square feet of
sales area;
.
.
.
2. Sell beer and wine for off-site consumption within 150 feet of
residentially zoned property; and
3. Be open for business 24 hours a day within 150 feet of
residentially zoned property.
SITE AREA:
26;774 square feet (0.61 acre).
FRONTAGES: Approximately 170 feet along East Huntington Drive
Approximately 145 feet along South First Avenue
EXISTING LAND USE:
The site is developed with an automobile service station with a
three-bay service building and eight fueling positions under a
detached canopy.
ZONING CLASSIFICATION: CBD/Centrcil Business. District
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Mixed-Use - Commercial/Multiple-Family
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND ZONING:
No rt h :
South:
East:
West:
Strip commercial - zoned CBD
Financial institution - zoned CBD
General offices - zoned CBD
Financial institution - zoned CBD
PROPOSAL AND ANALYSIS
The proposal is to expand and convert an existing three-bay automobile service
building into a 3,720 square foot convenience mart with 2,000 square feet of sales
floor area, and replace an existing .detached fuel pump canopy. This will change the
use of the site from an automobile service station (gasoline sales with full service
available and mechanical repair services) to an automobile fueling station (self-serve
only gasoline sales and a convenience mart). A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) is
required for:
1. The automobile fueling station (AMC Sec. 9275.4.7.4)
2. The sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption at a site that is within 150
feet of residentially zoned property (AMC Sec. 9275.1.53.6)
3. 24-hour operation of an automobile fueling station at a site that is within 150 feet
of residentially zoned property (AMC Sec. 9275.1.53.7)
CUP 03-001 & ADR 02-057
January 14, 2003
Page 2
.
Gas Station and Convenience Mart
The ,existing automobile service building will be expanded and converted into a
convenience mart. The building will have a total area of 3,720 square feet, but the
sales floor will be limited to 2,000 square feet as required by Code. The existing
fueling locations will remain, but the canopy will be replaced with a wider canopy to
fully cover the pump Islands and remodeled to match the convenience mart. The
replacement canopy will be at approximately the same height as the existing canopy.
There will be 13 parking spaces provided on-site. Ten (10) parking spaces will be
along the east side of the property and three (3) spaces, including (1) van-accessible
handicap parking space will be in front of the convenience mart. The parking spaces
shall be marked per Section 9269.8.1 which requires "hairpin" type of marking.
A water and air dispenser will be provided adjacent to parking space no. 10 next to
the new trash enclosure that will be located just off the alley at the southeast comer
of the site.
The existing northerly driveway on First Avenue Will be removed, as recommended
by the City's Traffic Engineer, and a large landscaping planter will be provided along
First Avenue. The remaining three (3) driveways, as well as the access from the
. alley, will be accented with decorative paving. .
Beer and Wine Sales
The proposal includes a request to sell beer and wine for off-site consumption. The
selling of alcoholic beverages is allowed by the Conditional Use Regulations for
Automobile Fueling Stations, subject to compliance with other applicable sections of
the Arcadia Municipal Code and State laws. In this case, a CUP must specifically
approve the sale of beer and wine because the site is within 150 feet of residentially
zoned property. The parking lot to the southeast, across ~he 20-foot wide alley is
zoned PR-3, which allows for parking for the adjacent commercial use(s) or multiple-
family residential.
The State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control will regulate the sales of
alcoholic beverages. The site is to be well illuminated. Lights are to be provided on
all sides of the convenience mart, a light will be provided with the air and water
dispenser, and the fuel pump area will be lit by the canopy lights. No additional City
restrictions are considered necessary at this time. Should a problem arise in the
future, the City has the ability to address nuisance situations by recalling or revoking
a CUP or certain provisions of a CUP through the public hearing process, and the
State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control can also revoke or amend its
license to sell alcoholic beverages.
.
CUP 03-001 & ADR 02-057
January 14,2003
Page 3
.
.
.
24-Hour Ooeration
The applicant is requesting to be open on a 24-hour basis. A CUP is required for
businesses that are within 150 feet of residentially zoned property if it is to be open
for more than a total of 16 hours per day or between 12:00 midnight and 6:00 a.m.
Having a gas. station and convenience mart open on a 24-hour basis at this location
should not be a problem. If problems arise at the new automobile fueling station, the
City has the ability to address nuisance situations by reviewing or revoking a CUP or
certain provisions of a CUP through the public hearing process.
Architectural Desian Review
Concurrent with the consideration oHhe CUP, the Planning Commission is to review
the architectural, landscaping and sign design concept plans. The subject property
is within the Central Redevelopment Project Area, and therefore, this proposal is
subject to design review approval by the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency (Le.,
Arcadia City Council). The Planning Commission's comments and recommendations
with regard to the design concept plans will be forwarded to the Agency.
The convenience mart has been designed with consideration of the City's
Architectural Design Guidelines and the surrounding developments. The colors are
earth tone: there will be stone veneer wainscoting, light gray and tan stucco walls,
and gray slate tile roofing on the entry. The accents on the convenience mart are the
pilasters, which are on all sides of the building, the extended entry feature, and a thin
red stripe above the storefront windows. The red stripe, blue "Food Mart" sign, and
off-white stucco will provide for the "Red, White & Blue" Chevron color scheme.
The canopy will be replaced with a wider canopy to fully cover the fuel pump islands,
and its shape and colors will match the convenience mart. The height of the canopy
will remain approximately the same.
Landscaoina
A landscaping plan has not been prepared, but large landscaping areas have been
added to the site, and iandscaping will be on all sides of the building. The
landscaping has been laid out in accordance with the Conditional Use Regulations
for Drive-in Businesses. The final landscaping and irrigation plans will be reviewed
by the City's Landscape Architect and will be subject to approval by the Community
Development Administrator.
Sians
The applicant has indicated that the existing pole sign wili be replaced by an
internally illuminated monument sign. Internally illuminated individual letters will be
used for a blue "Food Mart" wall sign on the convenience mart above the entry. The
CUP 03-001 & ADR 02-057
January 14, 2003
Page 4
.
canopy will have internally illuminated "Chevron" signs with white faces and blue
returns on the West and East sides, and internally illuminated "Chevron" logos on
the North and South sides.
Plans for the monument sign have not been provided. The other signs are shown on
the proposed plans. The monument sign, and any other signs not shown in this
proposal, will be subject to separate Architectural Design Reviews and approvals by
the Community Development Administrator.
It is staffs opinion that the proposed design will provide for adequate visual relief and
landscaping so that the convenience mart, fuel pump canopy, the site, and the signs
will be visually harmonious with surrounding developments, and that the proposed
design concepts will be in compliance with the City's Architectural Design Guidelines.
Other Requirements
The applicant is required to comply with all development requirements and policies
determined to be necessary by the Building Official, City Engineer, Community
Development Administrator, Fire Marshall, Public Works Services Director, and any
service districts and utility providers that will serve the proposed automobile fueling
station. Fully detailed construction and tenant improvement plans will be subject to
. plan check review and approval.
FINDINGS,
Section 9275.1.2 of the Arcadia Municipal Code requires that for a Conditional Use
Permit to be granted,it must be found that all of the following prerequisite conditions
can be satisfied:
1.. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the
public health or welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such zone
or vicinity.
2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is properly one for which a
Conditional Use Permit is authorized.
3. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate said use. and all yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking, loading,
landscaping, and other features required to adjust said use with the land and
uses in the neighborhood.
4. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type
to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use.
.
CUP 03-001 & ADR 02-057
January 14, 2003
Page 5
.
.
.
5. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the
comprehensive General Plan.
CEQA
Pursuant to the prOVIsions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the
Development Services Department has prepared an Initial Study for the proposed
project. Said Initial Study did not disclose any substantial or potentially substantial
adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the
project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise and objects of
historical or aesthetic significance. When considering the record as a whole, there is
no evidence that the proposed project will have any potential for adverse effect on
wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Therefore, a
Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project.
SPECIAL INFORMATION
The subject site is within the Central Redevelopment Project Area. Automobile
service uses and convenience marts are considered "Inappropriate Uses in the
Project Area" under Arcadia Redevelopment Agency Resolution No. 172. However,
the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency granted a Waiver from ARA Resolution No. 172
on June 18, 2002. This proposal is subject to design review approval by the
Redevelopment Agency.
RECOMMENDATION
The Development Services Department recommends approval of Conditional Use
Permit No. CUP 03-001, subject to the following conditions:
1. The automobile fueling station and the site shall be improved, operated and
maintained in manners that are consistent with the proposal and plans submitted
and conditionally approved for CUP 03-001, including compliance with all
comments, recommendations, and requirements received from the various City
Departments, subject to the satisfaction of the Directors of said Departments.
2. Detailed landscaping and irrigation plans are to be submitted to the Development
Services Department and are subject to approval by the Community
Development Administrator. These plans will be reviewed by the City's
Landscape Architect, at the applicant's expense, and shall comply with their
recommendations, subject to the review and approval of the Community
Development Administrator.
3. Parking spaces shall be striped in accordance with Section 9269.8.1 of the
Arcadia Municipal Code.
CUP 03-001 & ADR 02-057
January 14, 2003
Page 6
. 4. The accenting of the driveways (I.e., pavers) shall be provided subject to the
approval of the Community Development Administrator.
5. A monument sign with a maximum height of six feet shall be provided in lieu of
the existing pole sign. The monument sign shall be submitted for a separate
Architectural Design Review, and is subject to approval by the Community
Development Administrator. Said sign shall be designed in accordance with the
City's Sign Design Guidelines.
6. If it is determined tq be necessary, on the basis of complaints from surrounding
residents and businesses, the Community Development Administrator may
require a noticed public hearing, to be paid for by the owner andlor operator of
the automobile fueling station, for the consideration of imposing restrictions on
the business hours and/or the sale of beer and wine, and/or to add other site
improvements to address the specific complaints.
.
7. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Arcadia and
Its officers, employees. and agents from and against any claim, action, or
proceeding against the City of Arcadia, its officers, employees or agents to
attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or condition of approval of the City
of Arcadia concerning this projectand/or land use decision, including but not
limited to any approval or condition of approval of the City Council. Planning
Commission, or City Staff, which action is brought within the time period
provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37 or other prOVision of law
applicable to this project or decision. The City shall promptly notify the applicant
of any claim, action, or proceeding concerning the project andlor land use
decision and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. The City
reserves the right, at its own option, to choose its own attorney to represent the
City, its officers, employees, and agents in the defense of the matter.
8. Noncompliance with the plans, provisions, requirements of various City
departments, and the conditions of approval for CUP 03-001 shall be grounds for
immediate suspension andlor revocation of any approvals, which shall result in
suspension of construction and/or operation of the automobile fueling station.
9. Approval of CUP 03-001 shall not take effect until the property owner, applicant
and applicant's agent have executed and filed the Acceptance Form available
from the Development Services Department to indicate awareness and
acceptance of the conditions of approval.
.
CUP 03-001 & ADR 02-057
January 14, 2003
Page 7
.
.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Approval
The Planning Commission should move to adopt the Negative Declaration,
state the supporting findings, and direct staff to prepare a resolution
incorporating the Commission's decision, specific findings, and any
conditions of approval.
Denial
If the Planning Commission intends to deny this Conditional Use Permit application,
the Commission should move for denial and direct. staff to prepare a resolution
incorporating the Commission's decision and specific findings.
If any Planning Commissioner, or other interested party has any questions or
comments regarding this matter prior to the January 14th public hearing, please
contact Planning Services at (626) 574-5423.
onna L. Butler
Community Development Administrator
Attachments: Vicinity Map
Aerial Photo with Zoning
Reduced Copies of the Plans
Negative Declaration and Initial Study
.
CUP 03-001 & ADR 02-057
January 14, 2003
Page 8
~ ~
(26-28) I
104. N
0 104 Feat (20-22)
-
(12)
(8-10)
11 (135)
f 9) ($1) (55) (59) (65) (2) f1051 W (117) (129) 31) (133) f
HUNTINGTON DR
, (52 54 (60) W/~ 118) 22) 28) ( 34) (1
~ (121 138
~
.~ '/
~
(21)
q:
(25-27) I- (30)
CI) (135)
e::
(51) (55) (31-35) l12n f139)
u:
ALTA ST
(118) ( 20) 71~) (1 2) (1 14) (138)
) ($0) (54) (103)
(101)
(105)
(107) .....
..
(111)
1ffs ...~. 102 E Huntington Drive
Detpment Services DepMfment
CUP 03-001
Engineering Division ,~ ~
1tuJalldby:R.s.Goozam, Januiry. 2003 &0 "
-l'Jto~'r5'O"
~
N
100
o
100 Feel
,1,
,j
LJ
m 102 E Huntington Dr
o Arcadia
I cso! Zcne
'Afn..
~
Detopment Services Department
Engineering Division
FfepmKJby: RS.Gonzsl>z,.knBy 2003
1@2 IE HUJJU1J~DU1Jgt@U1J DtrDfi~
CUP @3c@@1/
<;r~r
.
.
'i.
ALLEY
'i.
_n.-.-:g\-..ft'''-...-rtII'
I lOM~
0"
-..
..
0 G ft=" p~-
0 G~
10
in
-- , 0
....... ~ 0
0
0
"
.
-
1.,.-. 0"It 1''1P',)
r"'::J::"
DCD'
'-.......... Ilil
1"'1 o~ 0 c
..~'" I .or Y'J I ~ I
'If ' t\.
~ ! ~g"."=-~!IOCI'_'"
:' i
" I ..
lO.:GII'II(lf_ .,' I
10_ .,,'
D.zr.U"~'/I'
PIElCGIlIl~.IT' .
/ :' \'..
I!
. ~., ""'17
...tl:COIe._/
lOilIIwo i :' .
I. ' .
M.J,"""lrrIESfMllCl~"""e1C.-\""',J
1....1 -,0-r-"'-\..o ' {)
;J"",r. r.:
I
I
I
I I
'-r--
I ,
I ,
I
l' fDa'
I ,
_L_
I
I
I
I
I-'~
\,
\...~~......,..u
''''1.1
\
\ P.""lo,.l'~l_
\ m_
,
.
,
, DCD
I I
1---'-
I
~
"
\
ft
itr:.F_~
~
....-
~ol;~ .::;:::;:::;:::;:;:;:::::::;:::::;:::::;:::::;:::::;:;:::;:::::;:::::::::::::::;:::;. t ;:::;:::;:::;::.-'
"Tf lJIII' ,.
c....r.-lt~QIT
U.CDc.~
l&#./__
./~"-Sl.-o_,*
~t/
"'~-
"~U
b.;"..q0ll"-~
..r~lItfllOll'C~
"
"
"
'.
QW~IE
HUNTINGTON
DRIVE
":.
'i.
Ii
II
-!
-I
..
>
k
~
;1
.(....~: '.
~.'.'~; ~.: -'
I
I
'i
.
,
-~
'=W1.....~_
-... e....- WI>>
w
::;)
z
w
~
ti
0:
u:
r
<f'
~.._~,
._,,41>__'....11:0
-_...~-
JU' _~ 'Ioa- ~oq
'A~
,.~'-..otA__1Ulr..
=':::.?"~~~
.
SUMMARY DATA
...-=. _rc__
~--
~p_1IQo P7J-OIH3f
~__~ l.OUu-Jl.-ll<:CIn._A--'~1llACf
~u=t: o:JICtSM_.....-...-
~IG: RICDi..,...."..._
__ _.ltttlO1lUl._a~
~r.c ...-......~
~.-
~OICI~ ~::,
~........ .d'._'...n.........,'lrl
~-.. ul.~rrnll..,.CI,S1IIll
......._,lr'SfIUUt U1&~1U1
I"r~'...._rttt
roc J,1J:CI-r;u7"
__r=_h "~~rall'ln(l'.-lr.)
~rIIf#< '~9./:J.-~-==~lJ-::~
--- l~~.-u~~m.=-IEI.IOf--
_~ Il..+al~ _1CaUIU"~)
VICINITY MAP
ffi
i
i
$
SITE PLAN
,...Iet
8JtIIlVnJn
J Ii f
~1'I..oot._tJ,r.
"""'~'Q;XIoAliIl
--'
~L~tII:'.
...~.~
,. '"
;lI\. lD (>\. tV"
o.i-u. "mt=
- "'
~..
=\~;m/V:)
A1
.
.
-.'-'---. --.------- - - -_.
I'IOWCI:~!A'"
~:'
UU".'ll1DlOU_
I
~'U'.('JIli:ll'ltlQ._
IS ,DRAGE I U IIU HI
~ltL1.
-~.
~~COoO'._
~
..
;'71
llr.dJ
.~
~~
.~
EB
N
FLOOR PLAN
1/'-."_<11'
-~
,=f.I:;f__1I:N~
ue..tJ.t,.(.aU';Ilok-tl*
iii OIevron
lIIlllnl\.:lOll>IIU_:mI1Sf
dDlC.ru.ws.~1
1_~~""'.ll:It:~
-....JO,.~fO!:n
'lt4PO.Ul:rm U,..__._,
.-
~-
IQI_.~anr'
_____~_7
lC.!?tU-o"l'.ua ,.... ~".!.oll,&)olt
.
--
(><t_... 'G(D&Ul (Oo\Oj:lll><
-~
t=e;_tICI'llO<_
...~..~I;IItliO"_
~1/"-"..a' O'!r"(nft,:i
tAW Qo.W OS'P
=~tnm
-A2
.
.
.
l
"--I"'~E1
~--<--,m
.,...--E1
. ..
I;:~"~:;:,.::,;~:~~,~'..;:~(. .
...".-.....,..........
..... .:...;,........
,:.".~.~:...'~. J
.'-
-
-
j
l
/I
(i
.-
-
,.
,
k
.'
,7
,
--
--~
~IT"
NORTH ELEVATION
CiJ.1,.r~---....-
--.
---.lflI'Im
-----=fiJ
-_O'O'.G
-~-
~,..;.." ~,:.~.,..:..u. :~...? ~.~~,:~..~,'..:..,,'.'.~.:,:......'..:.. ~j :~:~':::: ;~):::~~.; ::~.;;~~., :\~:' ~...; ~./ ~~ >': ~~':~~:; ~ : .~~~... ;:~~:f
__ - ~'.-r~,--:;;,' " ~.' ."'~.;7::. -;...... .-,'". ..-..~....--~
. :": ;':':': :'-:';'{>~ :".;~<
,
'..,s.-
>': .
;':.~:::..:::; ;::.~" :':':~':~_': ~~ ~ ;~.::.;~ ..f -.\ .~'~~"~ ':?~?'~:' :~'.:;:.~ -.r::.'~ ~;:~~"~'::'~:'~:_;'~'.::. :'::.r ~,~.: .::-;.~ '.::~ ':...; \~~(~?:~~~, ::~.
,_ .1>. . . .. ",.,", ......:....:::<:::..:::. .,~..:;;-.. ~.:..:....:'.\:- "_'.~'_., ".. "A' I.':.'; ;....,:'.-:........' . ,. ..~....,,, ./, .
.;~ ;. , . . . :'~: : '.~.," '.",:..:'c': ','.....:..,...:....'..'....'..,..'..',..,.,.'_,.;.-, ..,.....'..'..::.... ....'. .' ~ : ;-;.
:;,;.;SF~;:i:\;:;~:~~.i:::::.:': i::~:,:. ~{, i:;::L(;~', ;~<.: :;,~.l:\2;:";;>~3' : ':. ... ,. ,..~. '.' "'.:'."';:-' ';,. i:. ~-..;:~~.Sh:;;~~.
.~: ;:~ <':..~.;,-::;; ;.:':i.:.:'; .:.:;;'::~ .::';.'~'~' ~"::<~':; ;~~: ;.:i ;',,;"~:~';-~t.;'~: : ,:~., ." .. ~..~. ~"..;:~ ':.\... :=-; : .:,~~~:~ ,:~t:~-:::~.~~~!t ~~" ..
SOlTTH ELEVATION
~~;:r-___4_-
'"''''''''''
_, -....
~0Il~
--.
~-
--
-
~
--
-
-
-.
--
-..."'"---
......-.......
--
-'.
...~......
---
-...-
--..-
--....
--
.----
=~to.a
[]'I - - -=:J-
I!l --
---
[]'I ~~. ~.
[]'I ~ _.......,
ilJ ~ &.--'-,
I!l ~ ........
~.-
--
-'"
tcJUSl___
~~"'-
8 OIevrun
__~U!\d;~
e>-I-'-- f'IICZlWIlICCllolU!!Xlh
-'"
Ill:L_IIlllO_llIUi
~~-
Sl:-..L'/4........ llo<1t.'It"21',"U
~_Ul' CKlU_
UCIII.~_llG1
.-IC(Il~....__.,Jl:l1l0
~~~~"'I
M_
"~~'-":'1UI'l1
--.;l::....... ~.~
1Il:-:I..)o1U<1 r.....l'l.~lQ..
=\~mJll:
~A3
.
.
--0-- __.__ ,_____
I
:", '. ~'f.,,'<;f;':'" :::-~~:.~r ::::.~~, :J:-'~-.!-i'.,.~..;.. ~'2:-. ~:;.. 'c:.':/., <-:1>
. . ""t''''i.!.fl. ',- .....:::;.::, - . ." .....~... .'... .., ....r"
:.;...:..~.>...:.... ~':~:-._......:"8. ~~:"",(",~,,,,';o: ...-~'-'..::::.
I
I
~
I
I
!
I
.' ..... ., ,""., ..... ""'-"j
:.:. .,' ."'..:".. '.;:,~ ,,". ,':~i~~:~'~.~~~..~.~..:'. ~:.:..
.~~~J: :~'i};~:; '..:: i~xj::~! ~i.::~j ::~;f:B~:':;~:,~}~~;: .:(t:
-----' "
-.......~..::~-
WEST ELEVATION
......1I't".._ ---
---
~~-_:~,:;..,.:;..;;..~-_,.;;;:::l_.
,
EAST ELEVATION
__'V~
._'-"R_
'I
-
~~
""'''''''''
......, --
~
-.
=
H
-
===
=
=-.~~
=::::
:.~...-==
---
...-...-
___T
::.,..---
==~...
--
~u:=-
m .....- "J-
m ~-QIE,lOO -
m au. lUll! -,
El - ..-
m ~ ~
ill - --
-~
=I:>V_bClOOI_
~_.-
Ii O1evron
'i:ol;.::"~~.
_.._.C~_
1Q.._.IZI.Jn).~_JOU
~-
''''_.-~~C:
-~--~~,
J!1.1k,..?uq '~'l'I4.IQNoI
.
--,
"'-
~
Lo-Sl.._l"u:ro_
a.c.___
-~
,c::-r.~llW'ol"
....,....__...M<<:lIl.
~ .,.... \'-0- gAlL 'aml">>
...1l1 Cl\.W_.
lm~mm
~'A4
llf-e"
~'-o" NEW C"I,hOP't F'ASCIA
33'","
9'-6"
.....
I
,
I
i
i
~i
,
~I
~!
I
I
.
"'-r
U'-o" [It. CNKJ>Y llO,j~
IiltTAlCAH~Cf.lllHO
~~Of'f-l'.tiIltm
~t1vr PMnl!)
~~WllH
&JAAh:-lr~)
~o~"~ID
...-
MTE('lti-83S) "AJlOI>AW-IC
o
BASEl OARX QRAY (t1-210)[!J
""""""UO.
-------
~~
FJ,C[ \11I111 BWE: NETAI..
~s (S"-lffiiERS)
.....",.....
...""""""
EX. ClWm POST
T'l'P.Of'e
!Jl. liHlQt
CANOPY, WEST ELEVATioN (EAST ELEVATION MIRROR IMAGE)
If~..r-r
;y.'-o~ NEW CAAOP'r fASOA
2J.....q- E1(. CAAOPY RaIO'f[O
OUCAAU ....0f1Ell
1IlTtR/'4ALl.Y Il.WJ,a/olATED
umw_
.
~
EX. Pl.AHlDl (..,
~~1~21rol!l
tJl". POS SICN (HON-I\..llIIlIOI'A tal)
CANOPY - NORTH ELEVATION (SOUTH ELEVATION MIRROR IMAGE)
1(.-~-tr
""" C!I
ewt (a,-370)
rVNWPAlIl1<lQ
r:~~~ OfT-WHlI( [!]
_w:
1O;l:W1~lIRI'IC.
~~.Il_
UlIoIL~~
,_I'......._....1.~O
_"llI'J.~1O;m'
tEl.: JIOJALVn '1.>;- JI,O.JOU6U
M~
745t...aKlt..'IOlL!Uttr
~ft.IOO.C>UJ~qo
!tl.:7U",UI,UJ rL(: 1M-"'7-AJt1
""""""
COlla< UCENll
- - --.
0 ~ "" -:J-- =-
l!I 1U..._CllhlO ~ --
[;] Gl/.IIo't_~ '""
ill '" 1<--
@] ..... L_'
ID ,~- -~
0 WITt -.
l!J 0'" ~'m
I!I -Dn'.I/loII.U """.7.
S OIevron
~lUV-'\ur:ws
OIt'olI(NF'OI:(lI,WIr~
.......
U12(.~llIIM
~CWf'OI!lM"'_
5CAU; tJ... ,'....0" D#.l:t>I1/l1,ItQ:
CM.l.U Q\. UT ~.
*~mJD2
~'A5
.
" ,
,
"j
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
1. Name, If any, and a brief description of project: Conditional Use Permit Application No.
CUP 03-001 - A Conditional Use Permit with Architectural Design Review to expand and
convert an existing service station into a 24-hour fueling stat/on with 8 fueling positions, a
3,720 square foot building with 2,000 square feet of convenience mart sales araa with beer
and wine sales for off~site consumption.
.
2. Location: 102 E. Huntington Drive, in the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles
3. Entity or person undertaking project:
A.
X B. Other (Private)
(1) Name: Sirius, LLC
(2) Address: 102E Huntington Drive, Arcadia, CA 91006
The Planning Commission. having reviewed the Initial Study of this proposed project and having
reviewed the written comments received prior to the public meeting of the Planning
Commission, including the recommendation of the City's Staff, does hereby find and declare
that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A brief statement
of the reasons supporting the Planning Commission's findings are as follows:
. Approval ofa Conditional Use Permit for the proposed project will ensure conformance with
the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. There will be no Significant Impacts.
The Planning Commission hereby finds that the Negative Declaration reflects its independent
Judgment. A copy of the Initial Study may be obtained at:
Development Services Department
Community Development Division/Planning Services
240 W. Huntington Drive
Arcadia, CA 91007
(626) 574-5423
The location and custodian ofthe documents and any other material which constitute the record
of proceedings upon which the City based its decision to adopt this Negative Declaration are as
follows:
Development Services Department
Community Development DivisionlPlanning Services
240 W. Huntington Drive
Arcadia. CA 91007
(626) 574-5423
Staff
.
Date Received for Filing
Neg Dee
7/02
)
.
File No. CUP 03.001
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. ProjectTitle: '
Conditional Use Permit Application No. CUP 03-001
2. Project Address (Location)
102 E. Huntington Drive, in the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles
3. Project Sponsor's Name, Address & Telephone Number:
Sirius, LLC
102 E. Huntington Drive
Arcadia, CA 91007
Contact: Mr. Leon E. Felus, Architect (310) 821-2725
4. Lead Agency Name & Address:
. City of Arcadia - Development Services Department
Community Development Division - Planning Services
240 W. Huntington Drive
Post Office Box 60021
Arcadia, CA 91066-6021
5. Lead Agency Contact Person & Telephone Number:
Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator (626) 574-5442
6. General Plan Designation:
Mixed-Use - CommerciaIIMu/tiple-Far:nily
7. Zoning Classification:
CBD I Central Business District
.
8. Description of Project:
(Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the
project and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its
implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
A Conditional Use Permit with Architectural Design Review to expand and
convert an existing service station into a 24-hour fueling station with 8 fueling
posItions, a 3,720 square foot building with 2,000 square feet of convenience
mart sales area with beer and wine sales for off-site consumption.
-1-
CEQA Env. Checklist Part 1,7/02
.
.
.
)
. "
File No. CUP 03-001
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
(Briefly describe the project's surroundin9S')
The subject property is an existing automobile service station at the southeast
corner of the intersection of a major arterial (Huntington Dr.) and a major local
commercial street (First Ave.). The east side of the site is adjacent to a
commercia/ building occupied by an escrow office and mortgage brokerage. To
the south is an alley, across which is a parking structure for financial institution.
Another financial institution is across First Avenue to the west, and across
Huntington Drive to the north are strip commercial buildings. A bus stop is on
Huntington Drive directly in front of this site.
10. Other public agencies whose approval is required:
(e.g" permits. financing epproval, or participation agreement)
The subject property is within the Central Redevelopment Project Area and
therefore the architectural design of the proposed expansion and conversion of
the service building into a convenience mart will have to be approved by the
Redevelopment Agency.
The City Building Services. City Engineer, Fire Marshall, Public Works Services
and Development Services will review the construction plans for compliance with
aI/ applicable construction, safety, and pollution reduction codes, and will oversee
construction and installation of any necessary infrastructure or improvements.
This project is also subject to review and oversight by the Los Angeles County
Environmental Health Department and the weights and measures regulations of
the Agricultural Department.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this
project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as
indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
[ ] Aesthetics
[ ] Biological Resources
r ] Geology/Soils
[ ] HydrologylWater Quality
r ] Mineral Resources
r ] Population & Housing
r ] Recreation
[ ] Utilities and Service Systems
[ ] Air Quality
[ ] Cultural Resources
[ ] Hazards & Hazardous Materials
r ] Land Use & Planning
r ] Noise
[ ] Public Services
r ] Transportation / Circulation
r ] Mandatory Findings of Significance
"2-
CEOA Env. Checklist Part 1.7/02
')
Ale No. CUP 03-001
. DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
[X) I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
r] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the
mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the
project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[] I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
[ ]
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
but that at least one effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document
pursuant to applicable legal standards and has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on that earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, and if
any remaining effect is a .Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially
Significant Unless Mitigated," an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required, but it only needs to analyze the effects that have not yet been
addressed.
.
[] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all
potentially significant effects have been analyzed adequately in an earlier
Environmental Impact Report pursuant to applicable standards and have been
avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation
measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
By: Donna Butler, Community Development Administrato~
For: The City of Arcadia - Development Services Department
~;
.. ~/ ~
Sign ure
James M. Kasama. Sr. Planner
Printed Name
December 17. 2002
Date
Donna Butler
For
.
-3-
CEOA Env. Checklist Part 1. 7/02
.
.
.
I
, "
File No. CUP 03-001
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1. A brief explanation Is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately
supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each
question. A "No Impact" answer Is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show
that the impact simply does not apply to projects such as the one Involved (e.g" the project Is not
within a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should oe explained where it is based on project-
specific factors as well as general standards (e.g.. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to
pollutants. based on a project-specific screening analysis).
2. All answers must take account of the whole action Involved, including off;slte as well as on-site,
cumulative as well as project-level, Indirect as well as direct, and construction related as well as
operational impacts.
3. "Potentially Significant Impact" Is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect Is
significant. If there are one or more, "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination
Is made, an Envlronmental.lmpact Report is required.
4. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation
measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant
Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefiy explain how they
reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section 17 "Earlier
Analyses" may be cross-referenced).
5. Earlier ana.lyses may be used where, pursuant to tile tiering, program Environmental Impact Report,
or other CECA process, an effect has beenadequ!ltely analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative
Declaration {Section 15063(c)(3)(D)}. Earlier analyses are discussed in Section 17 at the end of the
checklist.
a) Earlier Analyses Used: Identify and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on
the earlier analysis. ,.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures that were Incorporated or refined from the
earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to Incorporate into the checklist, references to Information sources
for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or
outside document should, where appropriate, Include a reference to the page or pages where the
statement Is substantiated.
7. Supporting Information Sources. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or
individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8. The explanation of each Issue should identify:
a) The significance criteria or threshold, If any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) The mitigation measure Identified, if any, to reduce the Impact to less than significant.
-4-
CEOA Env. Checklist Part 1. 7/02
.
.1
1. AESTHETICS - Would the project
2.
.
a)
b)
Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
Substantially damage scenic resources, including. but not limited
to, trees, rock outcroppings. and historic buildings within a state
scenic highway?
c)
d)
')
Potentially
Slgnlflcant
Impact
o
o
o
o
File No.: CUP 03-001
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
No
Impact
181
181
181
181
AGRICULTURE RESOURCES - In determining whether impacts to agriculture resources are significant
environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site
Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in
assessing impacts on agriculture.and farmland. Would the project:
Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the
site and its surroundings?
Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would
adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
The proposed expansion and conversion of the service building Into a convenience mart will occupy a similar
portion of the southerly half of the site. The existing fueling pOSitions and canopy will remain. This project will
not have any of the above Impacts.
Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of
Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (The
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program In the California
Resources Agency to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson
Act contract?
a)
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to
their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to
non-agricultural use?
There are no agricultural resources at or near the project site.
3. AIR QUALITY - Where available, the significance criteria
established by the applicable air quality management or air
pollution control district may be relied upon to make'the following
determinations. Would the project: .
. c)
a)
Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air
quality pian?
b)
Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria
pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including
-5-
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
181
181
181
181
181
181
CECA Env. Checklist Part 2. 7102
.
.
. a)
b)
releasing emiSSions which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of
people?
Potentially'
Slgnlflcant
Impact
o
o
Less Than
Slgnlflcant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
File No.: CUP 03-001
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
No
Impact
[8J
[8J
The project will not create any new emission sources, and there are no pollutant concentrations at or near the
project site.
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through
habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate.
sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b)
Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans.
policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
o
o
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands 0
as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including but
not limited to , marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling. hydrological interruption or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or 0
migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery
sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological 0
resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an' adopted Habitat Conservation 0
Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan. or other approved
local, regional or state habitat conservation plan?
There are no biologIcal resources at or near the project site.
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
Cause a substantial adverse change in the signiflcance of a
historical resource as defined in !i 15064.5?
Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
archaeological resource pursuant to !i 15064.5?
.6-
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
[8J
[8J
[8J
[8J
[8J
[8J
[8J
[8J
CEOA Env. Checklist Part 2.7/02
, I
File No.: CUP 03-001
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
. Significant With Significant No
Impact MIUgation Impact Impact
Incorporation
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontologipal resource or 0 0 0 ~
site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of 0 0 0 ~
formal cemeteries?
fhere are no cultural resources at or near the project site.
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS.- Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, Injury,.or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake tault. as delineated on the 0 0 0 ~
most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
Issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known falilt? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
II) Strong seismic ground shaking? 0 0 0 ~
. Iii) Seismic-related ground failure. including liquefaction? 0 0 0 ~
v) Landslides? 0 0 0 ~
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? 0 0 0 ~
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable. or that would 0 0 0 ~
become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result In
on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction
or collapse?
d) Be loceted on expansive soil as defined In Table 18-1-B of the 0 0 0 ~
Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or
property?
e) Have solis Incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic 0 0 0 ~
tanks or altemative waste water disposal systems where sewers
are notavallable for the disposal of waste, water?
/he projec/slte is not within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone, is not subject to extraordinarily strong
seismic ground shaking, seismic-related ground failure, liquefaction, or landslides. The project will not affect
the soil. The project site is not known to have unstable or expansive soil. The buildings at the project site are
connected to the local sewer system, and the project will provide any necessary connection upgrades.
7. !:IAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project:
. a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment 0 0 0 ~
through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
-7-
CEQA Env. Checklist Part 2,7/02
.
. g)
h)
.
),
b)
Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions
Involving the release of hazardous materials Into the environment?
c)
Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile
of an existing or proposed school?
d)
Be located on a site which Is included on a list of hazardous
materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment?
For a project located within ari airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working In the project area?
For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in
the project area?
e)
f)
Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
Expose people or structures to a sigiflcant risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are
adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed
with wildlands?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
o
File No.: CUP 03-001
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
No
Impact
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
The project site is not on the above list of hazardous materials sites, is not within an airport land use plan. nor
is it within two miles of an airport or airstrip, nor is it near any wildlands. The project will comply with all
hazardous materials use and disposal regulations and any applicable emergency response requirements.
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be
a net deficit In aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level (Le.. the production rate of pre-existing
nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been
granted)?
c)
Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
Including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,
in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation
on- or off-site?
d) Substantially alter'the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
-8-
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
~
~
~
CEOA Env. Checklist Part 2,7/02
~
File No:: CUP 03-001
Less Than
. Potentially Significant less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
Including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river.
or substantially increase "the rate or amount of surface runoff In a
manner which would result In flooding on- or off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity 0 0 0 181
of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? 0 0 0 181
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area. as mapped on 0 0 0 181
a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood" Insurance Rate Map or
other flood hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede 0 0 0 181
or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, Injury or 0 0 0 181
death inVOlving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure
of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami or mudflow? 0 0 0 181
. k) Potential impact of project construction on storm water runoff? 0 0 0 181
I) Potential Impact of project post-construction activity on storm 0 0 0 181
water runoff?
m) Potential for discharge of storm water from areas from material 0 0 0 181
storage, vehicle or equipment maintenance (Including washing).
waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery
areas or loading docks, or other outdoor work areas?
n) Potential for discharge of storm water to cause significant harm on 0 0 0 181
the biological integrity of the waterways and water bodies?
0) Potential for discharge of storm water to Impair the beneficial uses 0 0 0 181
of the receiving waters or areas that provide water quality benefit?
p) Potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of 0 0 0 181
storm water runoff that can use environmental harm?
q) Potential for significant increases in erosion of the project site or 0 0 0 181
surrounding areas?
The ~xisting facility is connected to the local sewer system and wiil comply with ail applicable NPOES
requirements. The project wiil not have an affect on groundwater supplies or recharge, and will not alter the
existing drainage of the site. There are no Special Flood Hazard Areas In the City of Arcadia (FEMA Zone '01
however, the site Is within the Inundation Area of the Santa Anita Dam, but will not expose people to any
. additional or increasad hazard levels. The project will not adversely affect storm water runoff.
-9-
CEQAEnv. Checklist Part 2. 7/02
File No.: CUP 03-001
Less Than
. Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
9. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community? 0 0 0 ~
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of 0 0 0 ~
an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not
limited to the general plan, specific plan. local coastal program, or
zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural 0 0 0 ~
community conservation plan?
The project is at an existing commercial site and is consistent with the General Plan. and will be consistent with
the Zoning Ordinance if a Conditional Use Permit is approved;
10. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Result in the 1055 of availability of a known mineral resource that 0 0 0 ~
would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
. b) Result in the loss of availability' of a locally-important mineral 0 0 0 ~
resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan. specific
plan or other land use plan?
There are no mineral resources known to be at or near the project site.
11. NOISE - Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of 0 0 0 ~
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance,
or applicable standards of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome 0 0 0 ~
vibration or groundbome noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase In ambient noise levels in the 0 0 0 ~
project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise 0 0 0 ~
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where 0 0 0 ~
such a plan has not been adopted. within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to eXCessive noise levels?
. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip. would the 0 0 0 ~
project expose people residing or working In the project area to
excessive noise levels?
-10- CEQAEnv. Checklist Part 2,7/02
.
.
.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
I
File No.: CUP 03-001
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
ConstJVction of the expansion and conversion may generate additional noise but will not exceed established
standards, and the convenience mart will not result In an increase in the ambient noise levels.
12. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly
(for example. through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
The project is at an existing commercial development in a fully developed suburban commercial area.
13.
PUBLIC SERVICES Would the project:
IZI
IZI
IZI
Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered
governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental impacts, In order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times
or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection?
Pollee protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
The project will not need any new, additional, or altered public services.
14. RECREATION - Would the project:
a) Increase the use ot-exlsting neighborhood and regional parks or
other recreational facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational facilities which have an
adverse physical effect on the environment?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
IZI
IZI
IZI
IZI
IZI
IZI
IZI
The project is at an existing commercial development and will not result in any need for new, additional, or
altered recreational faci/ties.
- 11 -
o
o
CEQA Env. Checklist Part 2,7/02
o
o
.
15. TRANSPORTATlONrrRAFFIC - Would the project:
f)
. g)
a)
Cause an Increase in traffic which Is substantial In relation to the
existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e.. result In
a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the
volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion alintersectlons)?
b)
Exceed. either Individually or cumulatively, a level of service
standard established by the county congestion management
agency for designated roads or highways?
c)
Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an
increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in
substantial safety risks?
d)
Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e,g.. sharp
curves or dangerous Intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g.,
farm equipment)?
e)
Result in inadequate emergency access?
Result In Inadequate parking capacity?
Potentially
Slgnlficanl
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
File No,: CUP 03-001
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
No
Impact
IZI
IZI
IZI
IZI
IZI
IZI
IZI
Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting
alternative transportation (e.g., bus tumouts, bicycle racks)?
The project will not result in an increase In traffic or traffic hazards. The project will comply with all required
emergency access requirements. There parking complies with the City's requirements for an automobile
fueling stafion. The project will not conflict with any altematlve trensporation policies, plans or programs.
16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project:
.
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable
Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction ot new water or wastewater
treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
c) Require or result In the construction of new storm water drainage
facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental effects?
d)
Have sufficient water supplies available to selVe the project from
existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded
entitlements needed? In making this determination, the City shall
consider whether the project is subject to the water supply
asse~sment requirements of Water Code Section 10910, et seq.
(SB 610), and the requirements of Govemment Code Sect/on
664737 (SB221).
-12 -
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
IZI
IZI
IZI
IZI
CEQA Env. Checklist Part 2,7102
.
.
.
Potentially
SI9nlficant
Impact
e) Result In a determination by the wastewater treatment provider
which serves or may serve the project determined that It has
adequate capacity to serve the projeers projected demand in
addition to the provider's existing commitments?
o
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the projecfs solid waste disposal needs?
o
g) Comply with federal, state and local statu!,!s and regulations
related to solid waste?
o
Less Than
Significant
WIth
Mitigation
IncOrporation
o
o
o
File No.: CUP 03-0.Q1
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
No
Impact
IZI
IZI
IZI
The project will not result In an Increase In wastewater or stormwater generation. The project site has
adequate wster and solid waste disposal services.
17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a)
o
Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the
major periodS of California history or prehistory?
b) Does the project have impacts that are Individually limited. but 0
cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means
that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the . effects of past projects. the effects
of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause 0
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
Indirectly?
o
o
o
o
o
o
IZI
IZI
IZI
The project is at an existing commercial development In a .fully developed suburban commercial area. There
are not impacts that could become cumulatively considerable even if a similar development were to occur
nearby. This project will not result in any of the above impacts. '
-13 -
CEOA Env. Checklist Part 2,7/02
11-22-02 10:52am From-COD
6264479173
T-335 P.01/04 F-510
File No. 1'.",0 0.;'00/
.
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
(626) 574-5400
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMA TION-fORM
Date Filed: /t-l- (9z,
General Information
1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor:
9,,~ L05. I u..~
10'2 =-. t\:V,",'" N (4""tO ~ ~'''I!S
Arze:.A.'b\A I ~A ~lDOIo
2. Address of project (Lo~on):
. I () 2 E. t+OH'TU'" l.{1'ol' 'D\c:lve
3. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project:
l-~N E. 'fS:a.vs , A.~~""IT-'"
~OOO 'PALAWAH YJA'-( , ~u,~ b
HAtz-INA. 1:)1114- 1Ce,. ,CA q02~'2. 'f2ri: ~'o/~t:Z12.'5
4.
List and describe any otber related permits and other public approvals required for this
project, Including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies:
l.o $a A~~ ~uK"'H ~"UlDf'l M&/."'m.L ~L"'l'H b
( f'v E\.. ,~G. lkob 'FICA~'o'" ~ -L~~\
5. Zoning: Crpb- ,
6. General Plan Deslgnation:-InI'lEb use ~IANl~~lAL IMUL-rI-FA-"1.L'(
rr.
fmle~ Description
.
Proposed use of site (project description):
A.vto 0\.0&.,\,.& Fue;'L"" '"
VI I c:o~,,~'~ca fi:lo'b~A2f
11-22-02 10:53am From-CDD
6264479173
)
7-335 P.02/04 F-510
.
8. SiteSlze:~Sq.Ftl
9. Square footage per bullding:
2.01" (lI!=lC.) k...J.'004(A'OCo'\:: ~,'20
, "'Z.
Acre(s)
10. Number of floors of construction:
t
11. Amount of off-street parking provided:
I~ (I VAN A<"....e:'So:)IQ.~ "Atn:>1 C.AP'\- s:b)
12. Proposed scheduling of project:
A-f"L.\...1 f .z.oo~ - ~"L.'11., 2.00~
13. Associated projects:
Noio1 e.
..
Anticipated incremental development:
"'o~13l
15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or
rents, and type of household sizes expected:
~/A.
16. If commercial, indicate the type. Le. neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square
footage of sales area, and loading facilities, hours of operation:
CI"J'1' ~1~"t'l'!':h/114ll1.D'!Ii.F. \':4LE". A~I ~Atm"t... ON"rr:E/2.4~
( . of _..A~
17. If industrial, Indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities: .
l'4/A
18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated
occupancy. loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project:
t:\ I A.
..
If the project Involves a variance, conditional use permit or zoning application, state this
and indicate clearly why the application is required:
CuP tial5a't) P->>'1' "&Sc:::....floH. Qz.tD4. Z .9. t-4-
I!tMronlnfaFcnm
-2-
4/01
11-22-02 10:e3am Frcm-CDD
6264479173
T-33e P.03/04 F-510
.
20. Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects?
checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary).
XE-~ NO
a~1.
a r;t' 22.
[:J u( 23.
a fi( 24.
a Gt' 25.
[:J ~26.
CI ~27_
. ~28.
(i( a 29.
o cYso.
o ur" 31.
[:J ~32.
a Gr' 33.
Discuss below all items
Change In existing features of any hills, or substantial alteration of ground
contours.
Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public
lands or roads.
Change In pattern, scale or character of general area of project.
Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity.
Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage
patterns.
Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity.
Is site on filled land or on any slopes of 10 percent or more?
Use or disposal of potent/ally hazardous materials. such as toxic substances.
flammable or explosives 1)1?~"5>Il'''t.\ -.\. S1:Oo14c.€ ~ F A.v-ro fVta..
Jal.1".iT1~ Fla.e ~ ~\jIQ.oH,01-e.r'''L- <;4fe 6V~'5> -ro ~,A14It..l.
Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)
Substantial Increase in fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas,
etc.)
Relationship to a larger project or series of projects
Has a prior environmental Impact report been prepared for a program, plan,
policy or ordinance consistent with this project?
o 0 34. If you answered YES to question no. 33, may this project cause significant
effeclson the environment that were not examined in the prior EIR?
Environmental SettinQ
Describe (on a separate sheet) the project site as it exists before the project, including
information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, any cultural, historical or
scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the
structures. Attach photographs of the site. (Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be
accepted.) .
35.
.
EnvIronlnfcFann
-3-
4101
11-22-02 10:5am From-COO
.)
,
6264479173
-::,\
..)
T-335 P.04/04 F-510
.
36. Describe (on a separate sheet) the surrounding properties, including Information on
plants, animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type ofland uses
(residential, commercial, etc.), Intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses,
. shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-backs,
rear yards, etc.). Attach photographs of the Vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will
be accepted.
Corti6pstloQ
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the
data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the
facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
Date~Z -2. -tpZ
(SO""", ~~. filLu<.. ~ ......
.
For' SLQW.!:./ l..L~
.
Envl"",rnfoF_
-4-
4101
.
36.
.
.
. )
The existing site is a commercial corner property within the Central Business District. The site
is bounded on the north by Huntington Drive, on the west by First Avenue, an alley on the
south, and a commercialloton the east. Huntington Drive is a major arterial street. The entire
site is paved and is nearly flat with minimal slopes for drainage to the adjoining streets and
alley. There are raised landscape planters along the perimeter of the property nearest the
streets and alley. A 2,016 square foot metal building exits on site, which is used for
automobile repairs and a small convenience food mart. Also, there is an existing 1,196
square foot metal canopy over four fueling islands with eight fueling positions. There are three
underground fuel storage tanks. This site has little cultural, biological, or scenic special
interest. From a historical perspective, the City has developed design guidelines for the
Central Business District. This site falls within the design guidelines area.
All surrounding properties are also within the Central Business District. All neighboring
properties have commercial uses. To the east and west are banks, to the north retail
commercial stores and to the south is a parking structure. All structures are one or two stories
in height on nearly flat lots. The neighboring sites have little cultural, biological, or scenic
special interest. They however, fall within the design guidelines of the Central Business
District.
.
VIEW OF EXISTING BUILDING FROM THE NORTH
.
.
VIEW OF EXISTING BUILDING FROM THE NORTHWEST
-
1
flW OF EXISTING BUILDING FROM THE NORTHWEST
.
"
VIEW OF EXISTING FUELING CANOPY FROM THE WEST
.
VIEW OF EAST PROPERTY LINE LOOKING SOUTH
.
.
."~,",;T.:;,"/r;;'~~;li,:-:.~f#
\:!>3
VIEW OF EXISTING BUILDING FROM THE NORTHEAST
.
-j
WW OF EXISTING CORNER POLE SIGN
.
, ,
1'1"
"
.....
,'" ,"".
"
,.
,
,;?' .
7 "
, ,
"
. "
- :.. ':\...." ~ \.. "
, :, \~::I' .
n
: ,>'
VIEW OF SOUTH PROPERTY LINE AT ALLEY FROM THE WEST
.
'j
"\
,
.W OFF SITE TO THE NORTHEAST
.
..'
, :'~',
..}~;:., ,~!':
l' .,!I;, \.- .,c.',',".\..:'
.\'; ,\ \:....'
"',"c'
';'!.~'~lr;,~', .~.::~i~J~""
VIEW OFF SITE TO THE NORTH
"'j
.
"'{~"'-
. l...'i\.-~
~'"'~'~.'.!:<~. .
.W OFF SITE TO THE NORTHWEST
'.
. .. '-; :-1'
, "
" ,
"
, ."
",
, " t~'~
~-~. ~
!:1'
'. ;';~~~'
VIEW OFF SITE TO THE WEST
.
'j
'''~~r;~~~~ ~'~--, .~~}
: ;:~:~:;;t?~~,.~:',}
.~
.W OFF SITE TO THE SOUTHWEST
.
VIEW OF PLANTER OFF SITE TO THE SOUTHWEST
.4t
tl'W OFF SITE TO THE SOUTH
.