Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1667 -- . . RESOLUTION NO. 1667 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. GP 02-001 TO CHANGE THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM COMMERCIAL TO MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL (24 DUlAC MAX.) AT 1510-1516 S. BALDWIN AVENUE. WHEREAS, on December 6, 2001, Mr. Hank Jong, civil engineer, filed an application for a general plan amendment to change the land use designation from Commercial to Multiple Family Residential (24 DUlAC Max.) at 1510-1516 S. Baldwin Avenue, more particularly described as follows; for a proposed 9-unit residential condominium development at subject property. Lot 16 and 17 of Tract No. 5907, in the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 63 Page 67 of maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Except the northerly 100 feet, measured at right-angles of said lot 16. Also except the southerly 100 feet of said Lot 17, Tract No. 5907, as per map recorded in Book 63 Page 67 of maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County. Except therefrom the easterly 148.50 feet of the remainder of said lots. Also except that portion granted to the City of Arcadia, in deed recorded May 1,1969, as document No. 361, official records. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on January 22, 2002 at which time all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the factual data submitted by the Community Development Division of the Development Services Department in the attached report dated January 22, 2002 are true and correct. Section 2. The Planning Commission finds: 1. That the request to change the land use designation from Commercial to Multiple Family Residential (24 DUlAC Max.) at 1510-1516 S. Baldwin Avenue for a proposed 9-unit residential condominium development at subject property, does not conflict with the General Plan Land Use Designations of any surrounding or nearby properties. 2. That the proposed change is consistent with the recommendations in the General Plan I Zoning consistency study. 3. That the evaluation of the environmental impacts as set forth in the initial study is appropriate and that the project will have no significant effect upon the environment within - .' , the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and, when considering the project as a whole, there was no evidence before the City that the proposed project would have any potentially adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends, and therefore, a Negative Declaration should. be approved. Section 3. That for the foregolng'reasons the Planning Commission recommends to the City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. GP 02-001 based upon the information submitted by the Applicant to the City as of date of this Resolution. Section 4. The decision and findings contained in this Resolution reflect the Planning Commission's direction to staff given at its meeting of January 22, 2002, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Baderian, Olson, Huang NOES: none ABSENT: Commissioners Kalemkiarian, Murphy Section 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause a copy to be forwarded to the City Council of the City of Arcadia. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 1663 was adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on February 12, 2002, by the following vote,: AYES: Commissioners Kalemkiarian, Murphy, Olson, Baderian NOES: none ABSENT: Commissioner Huang cretary, Planning City of Arcadia APPROVED AS TO FORM; ~~~ Stephen P. Deitsch, City Attorney City of Arcadia -2- 1667 ~ . ., . . January 22, 2002 STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT TO: Arcadia City Planning Commission FROM: Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator By: Thomas P. Li, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: General Plan Amendment No. GP 02~001 to change the General Plan Land Use Designation from Commercial to Multiple-Family Residential (24 DUlAC Max.) at 1510-1516 S. Baldwin Avenue. SUMMARY General Plan Amendment Application No. GP 02-001 was submitted by Hank Jong, civil engineer, to change the General Plan Land Use Designation from Commercial to Multiple Family Residential (24 DUlAC Max.) for a proposed 9-unit residential condominium development at 1510-1516 S. Baldwin Avenue. The Development Services Department is recommending approval of this General Plan Amendment. e' GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Hank Jong (Civil Engineer) LOCATION: 1510-1516 S. Baldwin Avenue REQUEST: A General Plan Amendment to change the land Use Designation from Commercial to Multiple Family Residential (24 DUlAC Max.) at 1510-1516 S. Baldwin Avenue. SITE AREA: Approximately 20,189 square feet (0.46 acres) FRONTAGES: Approximately 123.4 feet along S.Baldwin Avenue EXISTING LAND USES AND ZONING: The site is currently developed with a cleaners and four multiple- family dwellings construCted in 1950. It is zoned C-2 for the northerly 23'-4" portion of the lot and R-3 for the southerly portion. e , " ". o . I . . SURROUNDING lAND USES & ZONING: North: Firestone Tires - zoned C-2 South: Multiple Family residences - zoned R-3 East: Multiple Family residences - zoned R-2 West: Commercial Office - zoned C-2 ZONING & GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS: The northerly 23.4 feet of the subject area is zoned C-2 for general commercial use with the southerly portion zoned R-3. The General Plan land Use Designation is Commercial for the entire site. BACKGROUND This site is currently developed with a cleaners the northerly 23.4-foot portion, zoned C-2, and a multiple-family residence on the southerly portion, zoned R-3. However, the General Plan land Use Designation is Commercial for the entire site. This General Plan Amendment is the first step in changing the General Plan land Use Designation and aligning the Zoning boundaries with the northerly lot line of 1510-1516 S. Baldwin Avenue. The eventual goal of the applicant is to develop this site wilh a 9-unit residential condominium project. PROPOSAL AND ANALYSIS This General Plan Amendment is to change the land Use Designation of 1510-1516 S. Baldwin Avenue (Parcel 2 of TR 5907) from Commercial to MFR-24 for Multiple Family Residential at a maximum density of 24 dwelling units per acre. The purpose of this change is to enable the R-3 zoned property to be developed with a 9-unit residential condominium project. The project could not be subdivided into condominiums unless there is consistency in the General Plan and Zoning. This General Plan Amendment is the first application necessary to enable the proposed 9-unit residential condominium project. Following this General Plan Amendment will be a Zone Change of the northerly 23.4-foot wide strip of property to be consistent with the General Plan by changing the zoning from C-2 to R-3. Once the Zone Change is approved, the Architectural Design Review, Zoning Modifications, and the Tentative Map for the proposed 9-unit residential condominium project can be scheduled for the Planning Commission's consideration. GP 02-001 January 22, 2002 Page 2 of 3 . . . CEQA Pursuant to the provIsions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Development Services Department has prepared an initial study for the proposed project. Said initial study did not disclose any substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise and objects of historical or aesthetic significance. When considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have any potential for adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been drafted for this project. RECOMMENDATION The Development Services Department recommends approval of General Plan Amendment No. GP 02-001. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION I The Planning Commission should direct staff to prepare the appropriate resolution for adoption at its next meeting. If any Planning Commissioner, or other interested party has any questions or comments regarding this matter prior to the January 22nd public hearing, please contact Assistant Planner, Thomas Li at (626) 574-5447. Appro jd by: h?'/~;~ Donna L. Butler Community Development Administrator Attachments: Site Plan Land Use and Zoning Map Photos Negative Declaration & Initial Study . GP 02-001 January 22, 2002 Page 3 of 3 .. , I I , , I I , I I I , I I , I I , I I I I I I \ \ I \ \ \ 1 \ 1 \ \ \ 1 , , \ \ \ \ \ I \ 1 \ \ \ \ I \ \ \ \ , SITE PLAN 1510 -1516 BALDWIN AVENUE ,.....~... a.Dt.,e;,.:r~'" ~J:B_flH" .. ______________<;.AMIN!l~~_______________J.____ ,_ nllUlt ...... ~ v- _."\ i r-~- I' , }~"".... L ' Il J (- i ~ ',~ - · -" ~u i r--+.I ~ i g 1500 BALDWIN AVE. " ..-1 ! ij! 'C....J ARCADIA (PARCEL 1) -, I :~ j I r-------~-------------------l ~ J !~:;J I ir !.dt "!~i ~-~ 1 ~~ \ ~i I ~~<f' ~ ~"i ',>' I '_' - !, ~ '} I ~' d -~~ ii: f \ .._ fila ! '\.., ~-=' ,..;;. TR r57907 $: ~....: .. ~--~~::: II ~I!~ - .n.........". --- i'( i 5 I .\~ /. /./ \:!/l'''----- ----~ 'V-~ I ~ e !' ll~ " .'/ I 't ! ~ : ;; 1 - 9 I I \_ /! 1S11-5~~ 'I I 1. I ~ /5"'/ I ~ I I 'q ..' " I ...... I ~. ---- .. " I \:t :' _ ~ ~$'~~~'.. ,J' E '\'" ,? f: 1t--Iri/)'T----.;;.;.-;;,;,---.1''''' .. ~ ,I i ., /~Jf' . " 15100-1516 BA~N A\IE. \ \ 1-J ~~/ LL;RCAO'~ (PARCEl. 2) , ! 11\ .. 'i~-r-I... I ij. , k.,.... I l....~!m,~ ~. .t." , \ i_&---Y---:; -,. ;'f _:'~, ... .t. , 1'! + ':tf'------- " " ~ '-.n r' -Ay--- + \ =:.;~~.Ulfl: l.d___:~= -------1 saT_or , 0" I ' llN"PIlil~ """" , - \\ ______________'!.ORIoI~2~~____________.....A__ I ~ .__ III'lW'Ift y_ ~ MEA PROF~ FOR ZONE OlANGE AHO lCLLJ CENERAl. PLAN QfANG[ FROt.I C2 TO RJ PREPAREO BY: EGL Assoeiates, Ine. 11823 Slauson Avenue. Unit 18 5antq re SprinGs. CA 90670 Tel: (562)945-11689 Fax: (562) 945-0354 EG\. JOB NO. 00- f 42-013 NORTH ~ 1/1 SCALE: 1. = 20' '., . . . EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION . 1510~1516 BALDWiN AVE., ARCADIA: PARCEL 1: THE SOUTHERLY lOO FEET OF lOT 17, TRACT NO; 5907, IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA, COUNTY OF lOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 63 PAGE 67 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECOROER OF SAIO COUNTY. EXCEPT THE EASTERLY 148.50 FEET OF SAID lAND. ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION GRANTED TO THE CITY OF ARCADIA, IN DEED RECORDED MAY 1, 1969, AS DOCUMENT NO. 361, OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL 2: lOT 16 AND 17 OF TRACT NO. 5907, IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA, COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 63 PAGE 67 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPT THE NORTHERLY 100 FEET. MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGELES OF SAID LOT 16. ALSO EXCEPT THE SOUTHERLY 100 FEET OF SAID LOT 17, TRACT NO. 5907, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 63 PAGE 67 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPT THEREFROM THE EASTERLY 148.50 FEET OF THE REMAINDER OF SAID LOTS. ALSO EXCEPT THAT PORTION GRANTED TO THE CITY OF ARCADIA. IN DEED RECORDED MAY 1, 1969. AS DOCUMENT NO. 361, OFFICIAL RECORDS. EGL Associates, IDe. -- I um_A_1IliII1I _h8pdlop,CA_ 'NI~ -~- 1100.. 1810 -1518 BALDWIN AVE., ARCADIA, CAUFORNIA A N 50 50 100 Feet .1ffs pment Services Department Engineering Division Frepaea by: R,S ~ Nov. 2001 j5~@c1rs~:~ IBcaUdlwDIJ] Av~ {~IP (o)2cO(o)~ ~ . (1430) ~ . (1432) N (1431) Seal&: I'" 100' 60 0 60 100 Feet , (1439) (1.w>) (1441) (1442) (661) (1451) CAMINO REAL (660) 721-719 (711) (1500) ~ (1502) :c: (710) ~ (150S) (1sOB) m :iE 'l> r- ~ - Z (1522) ~ m (1530) (1601) (1601) (1602) (1609) (1609) (1615) 115. lopmen! Senices Department Engineering Division "'-"<Jby: R.s.GOIllIlIsl. Dee. 2001 (1616) (1621) 1510-1516 S Baldwin Ave GP 02-001 ", . . , . . Project Address: 1510 - 1516 Baldwin Ave., Arcadia, CA 91007 " <>i' < . o~ I'.{I .~... 2~fic . ".~;.~ '-r~l^~; _,'J,- .. . ,,","'" ;-', ,JJ~'" '. .. "-"", ~ ~ ,01;-." , _.,,' .. '~"Fl';r>J., i ",' 'i6_~ . ~,.. ~ -'" ':l:'- _ ~"" tR ,.j,;~ ~, .;;. '~~~'\.... ill . To ';l:,;;".l ':::ri;~' ,'~(A r' -..'~ . . "", .. .'.' ,,", .'," '~';:-J<I'If;i ...' ~ . ..... ..._.... ~_ ,,' "!If/....."';;..,...! ~~ .$ ~ l-' ~~ _0.1.., ~~ ...-....--,-J..,. : ' ~;.;.: ',:" ','" "", ...: c"" "\1'7,1.,~ \ . }~' ",;.;. , ~. 1 1'" - , " .. "', -, ,-' . ~ , ,., ,..-~~;,\o ' J .,",' . ' ""il .~.. -c' ,J ~ ..... ~~.....-... '_ ",... ", .-0( fir" - , '~:"'~'~ . ~ e'. ." i'-' ",tr-3-~' ~:"I"I t . " ~ . 'It'~., , , "Fl."', - _....~-:;... ~- > ~~ \";..." ,'~ '"':11/',' ~.. __ - ~_ _ , , .. :;\.-t.!:'!,r " t,l.. _ ';".~, .... Q . =~~ ._,~-~I:L.:~__ ~ ~.....~V~t~ ~[tt'~!J ~o. ~ ~~~~I!,iI~ill~~~1~_~'!~;j~lI~j~iti~Ii:'~~J\!t~~;Il~~~'i r'- -~-'--- Photo 1: Existing brick building (Fashion Cleaners) and one-story house at the project site. (Viewing east across Baldwin Ave.) - I '.' , '.' .,\Ji.,'" ' "I' i;,'1 Ill> r '...' ,. "~'1 ,'~, ~ ,- ~~o ,,' ,~;; ",.~~,~~>~,. ~, 'll . ~~,~:::. -::.1 ",,"" . "l; t1 W,. '''~i 'C.\ '. . '~"i~ ~,: . ....:, (:;,...."o . '". ,.,' o. ~.~~., 0..... . . "lP. " .... .;' \- 7 0 ~', ':,.,.' I,ll' _ l'l . '~ .~ " ~ 0 . v' , , ,.,-.,)1" ,'''&.. ,:rf'-"h'( '\,;.;'" . .-. " 'r' . L._, ;......./u:l~..~'~ ,t. '~ .-' .;. t:J;"'!: ;".:, .--...,);(". t),~ - - "<0,' . < ," ,\ '~~.I:l~"Hi;' J.o ~.~ ; l""t"~'''!;'-rt I' """ , ")J '. - ~- I <'I' ~\~""'''1.0;;;' -C""-:~I"'....;1:l;""~"',..'" '"....ry""'.-';'.':;;; ~ ~ '.~ ti ~,~~~'.-~f:,j~";' !:';, ; '::'1 p~:;vil '~~"~~~..~ ~ ,.;;-, i'~~ ~/~' .'~~ . _..,...., -- '. ';:"'iI' \.'11; ~i:';: . ~~~~~~,:.{",P ';" " -. ;,.~: n Ir:'..' ",J.>-~.:. '. 'r. '"q'~ If'o "."'-' _ - - - ',I. L.. ,.'.tj'- ':;'I~\ I, 3.', I \, ::-- 0;::- \,...) r-~-l'" " I '-,:::~,;" '. .':r .'..,Cf:\, I ,',iIll,i'>, , I,' . - ~D -.. '.~ , ~~ .~r,.~~..-'";.~~I,~I.'~~~ _ _. _;".'1:. -.,-! .. '9!.u.~",~:~~..&; ~"~~ll.~, ,~ " photo 2: Existing one-story house and apartment located at the project site. (Viewing southeast in the front of 1510 Baldwin Ave.) 1 .., . . . . . Project Address: 1510 -1516 Baldwin Ave., Arcadia, CA 91007 "--' - -- ~-.:.-.. . '--. ,r~ t lJ"; ~~. ".~.. . ~, , _'_ J7 a .".... ..If . .'" _ <. __ I ~" ........ r--- '- '. '-"""~' .- :r: ;: ",.,'J.~..' '.::~'::\G( J; ;tL,~:; .J>. . -' ,- J' - ,:;--;..:-...." ;i,1 .-',:':. ". . ,..'.~~il1'?r"'lt".'-''I.:'I:'~~_'''.,.h.''''('l'''i''~.-~. ~~J .' - l'iI!."/ " n" ,rlfi"~"" ""!..ijr....;;'-.?~t..tJ - ,~-...,~,":' ., . - 1 _::'\!~0"_L,."." '. I',^~_ lY.:' ~ ,.",,~. '.';ofl I l ,'f(..'~~"'J ...;1 _--. ... ~(Jf -',' I '~' ~r:.r..i.I"-.' -.".. -::s. ':;:....;..~::it~i:;~'.:, ".' 1.~.I:".I\;.~~i.F...~~,._::_;-....~.,,;,~ ...~._~ ~~:,.,,_..._..,~ ~~."'~" "~~.'-'?I.;:,:II';iI" ..' ...~t~.'.:_~ ~~'~'" I, " ~Jr. _',,"._;! ",,~ '-',-..' ',Ir' '-;'~I""'" -, .-",fl(~fl 1,IU:nf.ffi'~" '.1 _, '-..,- ~ - ~ ,!J.i.~.,,-"....:'::'~- "Zi;:.'!-'-,~.~" f("~I" ij~""~-;~ }'U,,:-'j51~J'~. " I" .i.!.J ~__-""__ ~l-"~''':.J.'.1,-f\:j!.-lt:,;'~.t:t~..~!:lI~\ '.. ' '-1- __._ '''-_~ ,=- _,,-_ . - '~.l. .-'J. _ If --,\_L!~J;~: ""--=~-;:--":;_o-,-~ ;:-,-._ "--'-='-~-c::.~~ C:::C,"-=~~.~.__ -=:::==:::'":;;;.....-= Photo 3: Existing building (Firestone) located at the north of the project site. (Viewing northeast across Baldwin Ave,) -'" ~' , .. , . "'..' r." =' :-,,;,r::;.._ Photo 4: Existing two-story townhouses located at the south of the project site. (Viewing southeast across Baldwin Ave.) 2 ", . I . e III Project Address: 1510 -1516 Baldwin Ave., Arcadia, CA 91007 , , .' " , , l..-.-.I L.=.z'---: ii~:" I.~ 'j~?if-'f' ". ~.-- u:;r-=s<:. ~-,:,""" :,,:,.' I,' ~.: . '1):' , ~. - J1 - ,~. r~-"::"'''';;' "-7~' .. '.' I -' . . cJ).,of" ';;:"t j.~ - ~ 'c ~ ::~'\ ~'t: _, ,~_ " .-.'::i::..;"'~:, . .'4.~;.~r;.:,i4 '.- _~_':~~'i::: . ; ~:~~~~ . "''-'' ',,_ :' ~.~h_ :~.~~tr,~-.'~~'l~'~I(j(<:"<~:,,",' ~l~ ,_~~=__ 4'. _ , ,-- ~-~__~ ~~ -:. -~~ -~-' =--- i _ __----~ ~~~..=____:_:_-~~ .. '==-::; - --":""~:;'Y:':,I.,. ~ _C - - .. ...- . -:-. -'- - .,-- ~--=- :1 Photo 5: Existing office building located at the opposite of project site. (Viewing northwest across Baldwin Ave.) ~. '~~.,: . '1-- .,1' r7'~,":"""',~' " ': '..:.. 'Mj1 . , f I' I ~ ..., ~ ", 1- ,< .. ' f '" ] :-. . "" " '.';. I" " <. . '{ I . I ./Il .-. oj;'" . .. .... r " _, -..,\. "l ,~f 4'" \ I>' .J' :'I1~h::; J?4.,...........,. ~ ~ "l}'-" '.' ....., , I' ~I.. II' I '~1'" ..II'\~ r", '.~. .' ;f1.~~.. " .,,' t" I 'I~' !.<., _. ,,:u ',' '.. r.' ,., '~~l. \ '... I' .. - ,r ,l( !" -J I" I ~; '.-' "" ~ .... .. .' _ "I' ,iJ' ~ ~ . I ~"I . . ,"tf '!'J~ ,_ I':;, <r' : ~,...., .,. I~::~J' "I~}&'I'I"r,::IIIJ,., !:i! .;., .1~;.!Ir:"I""~ ,'k-:'_("/.I."~'3~"--'" ~-'" 1 I tl~,~i\ :I. '..,c ~~,~ ~~ U, i' (,. l.. I" {II.... .,# t.'-5"\:/i;!- ~- ~ ~)~m;;-t!' -: ~ · .; -.,~- - - ~l~ '~"':I':' ~;:'-,.' ~,;: ' i ;',~1, r-. I'I;\; e;=~~--" ,I ""!;!I)"lli'1""I'".',~" , .fJII..~!J l,.~'f - 'c:::e. ~;: =~').:I _~~';[J I ,I"V'''' fr........; H." -~~ ,/f~ .'\:~I!II'r':'""" ".. ~h -~ ~ _ .,,~ ________. "i .;j'it,i~;I1!' '"', ' Photo 6: Existing three-story condominium located at the opposite side of the project site. (Viewing southwest across Baldwin Ave.) 3 ", . . , . . FileNo.: GP 02-001 CITY OF ARCADIA 240 W.HUNTINGTON DRIVE ARCADIA, CA 91007 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT NEGATIVE DECLARATION Adopted: Draft A. Title and Description of Project: General Plan Amendment Application No. GP 02-001 to change the Land Use Designation from Commercial to Multiple Family Residential (24 DUlAC Max.) for a proposed 9-unit residential condominium development. B. Location of Project: 1510-1516 S. Baldwin Avenue In the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles C. Name.of Applicant, Sponsor or Person Undertaking Project: Hank Jong (Civil Engineer) 11823 Slauson Avenue, #18 Santa Fe Springs, CA90670 (562) 945-0689 The City Council 0 Planning Commission 0, having reviewed the Initial Study of this proposed project and having reviewed the written comments received prior to the public meeting of the City Council, including the recommendaiton of the City's staff, does hereby find and declare that the proposed project will not have a siginificant effect on the environment. A brief statement of the reasons supporting the City Council's findings are as follows: The City Council 0 Planning Commission 0, hereby finds that the Negative Declaration reflects its independent judgement. A copy of the Initial Study may be obtained at: Community Development Division City of Arcadia 240 W. Huntington Dr. Arcadia, CA 91007 (626) 574-5423 The location and custodian of the documents and any other material which constiture the record of proceedings upon which the City based its decision to adopt this Negative Declartion are as follows: Community Development Division City of Arcadia 240 W. Huntington Dr. Arcadia, CA 91007 (626) 574-5423 Date: Date Posted: Staff 4/01 ". . . I , . . . File Nos.: GP 02-001 CITY OF ARCADIA 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE ARCADIA, CA 91007 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Project Title: General Plan Amendment No. GP 02-001 2. Lead Agency Name & Address: City of Arcadia Development Services Dept. 1 Community Development Div.1 Planning Services 240 W. Huntington Drive Post Office Box 60021 Arcadia, CA 91066-6021 3. Lead Agency Contact Person & Phone Number: Thomas P. Li, Assistant Planner- (626) 574-54471 fax (626) 447-9173 4. Project Location (address): 1510-1516 S. BaldWin Avenue In the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles 5. Project Sponsor's Name, Address & Phone Number: Hank Jong 11823 Slauson Avenue, Unit #18 Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670 (562) 945-06891 fax (562) 945-0364 6. General Plan Designation: Commercial 7. Zoning Classification: The northerly portion of the property (1510 S. Baldwin Avenue.) is zoned C-2 for general commercial. The southerly portion of the property (1516 S. Baldwin Avenue) is zoned R-3 for multiple family residential use. Fom:t. "J" -1- CEOA Checklist 4199 . . e . . File Nos.: GP 02.001 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whoie action involved, including but not Iim~ed to later phases of the project, and.any secondary, support, or off-site feetures necessary for its implementation.) A General Plan Amendment to change the Land Use Designation from Commercial .to Multiple Family Residential (24 DUlAC Max.) at 1510-1516 S. Baldwin. This is to accommodate a proposed 9-unit residential condominium development at subject site. 9. Surrounding land uses and setting: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings.) North: South: East: West: Firestone Tires - zoned C-2 Multiple Family residences - zoned R-3 Multiple Family residences ~ zoned R-2 Commercial Office- zoned C-2 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required: (e.g., permils. financing approval, participation agreemant) The City Building Services, Engineering Division, Fire Prevention Bureau, Public Works Services, and Water Services. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages: [ ] Aesthetics [ ] Mineral Resources [ ] Agricultural Resources [ ] Noise [ ] Air Quality [ 1 Population I Housing [ ] Biological Resources [ 1 Public Services [ ] Cultural Resources [ 1 Recreation [ ] Geology I Soils [ ] Transportation I Traffic [ ] Hazards & Hazardous Materials [ ] Utilities I Service Systems [ ] Hydrology I Water Quality. [ 1 Mandatory Findings of Significance [ 1 Land Use I Planning DETERM INA TION: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: [Xl I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions Form"JII -2- CEQA Checklist 4/99 . . e . . File Nos,: GP 02.001 in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [] I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. [] I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated impact" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. [] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, but because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided .or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. By: Thomas P. Li, Assistant Planner ~~4' Signature For: City of Arcadia Date: December 19,2001 Form "J" -3- CECA Checklist 4/99 I' I e . . File Nos.: GP 02-001 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact' answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the responses following each question. A "No Impact" answer'is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose. sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more, "Potentially Significant Impact' entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVIII, "Earlier Analyses," must be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist, references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources, uses or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9. The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significant criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. Form "J" -4- CEQA Checklist 4/99 I I I . File No.: GP 02-001 . Less Than Slgnlflcant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact I. AESTHETICS - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? [ ] [ 1 [] [Xl b} Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings. and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? [ ] [ 1 [] [X] c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? [ ] [ ] [] [X] d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? [ ] [ 1 [Xl [] The project and the eventual development of-the proposed 9 residential units will be a new source of light, but will not adversely affect views in the area. II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES - (In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.) Would the project: a} Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) as shown on the maps prepared pursuantto the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? [ 1 [ ] [] [Xl b} Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? [ 1 [ 1 [] [X] c} Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use? [ ] [ ] [J [X] There Is no agricultural or farmland on the subject property or in the vicinity. III. AIR QUALITY - (Where available, fhe significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.) Would the proposal: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air Quality Plan? [ ] [ 1 [] [X] b} Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? [ 1 [ ] [] [X] c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality s,tandard (including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? [ ] [ ] [J [Xl d} Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? [ ] [ ] [] [Xl e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? [ 1 [ ] [] [Xl The project and the eventual development of the proposed 9 residential units will not result in any of the above impacts. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Form'J- -5- CEOA Checklist 4Ill9 I I e . . FUe No,: GP 02-001 Less Than Significant PotentleUy With Less Than Significant Mitigation Signillcant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service? [ ] [ ] [] [X] b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, arid regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service? [ ] [ ] [] [X] c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vemal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? [ ] [ ] [] [X] d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? [ ] [ ] []. [X] e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? [ ] [ ] [] [X] f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan? [ ] [ ] [ ] . [X] The project and the eventual development of the proposed 9 residential units will not result in any of the above impacts. V. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? [ ] [ ] [] [X] b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? [ ] [ J [] [X] c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? [ ] [ ] [] [Xl d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? [ ] [ ] [] [Xl The project and the eventual development of the proposed 9 residential units will not result in any of the above impacts. VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the,area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42). [ ] [ ] [] [X] i1) Strong seismic ground shaking? [ ] [ ] [X] [] iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? [ ] [ ] [] [X] iv) Landslides [ ] [ ] [J [X] b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss oftopsoil? [ ] [ ] [] [X] c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and Form ~ J" -6- CEOA CheckUst 4/99 I . e potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? [ I [ ] [] [X] d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-8 of the Uniform Building Code (1994) creating substantial risks to life or property? [ 1 [ 1 [] [Xl e) Have soils, incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or altemative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? [ 1 [ 1 [] [Xl The project and the eventual development of the proposed 9 residential units will not result in any of the above impacts. VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous matenals? [ ] [ ] [l [Xl b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? [ ] [ ] [J [Xl c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? [ ] [ J [] [X] d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? ( ] ( 1 [] [X] e) For a project located within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? [ 1 [ ] (l [Xl f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? [ 1 [ ] [l [Xl g) Impair implementation of, or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? [ ] [ ] [l [Xl h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? [ 1 [ 1 [ l. [X] The project and the eventual development of the proposed 9 residential units will not result in any of the above impacts. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of ihe local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not . Form "J" -7- . FileNo.: GP 02-001 less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant MitlgeUon Significant No Impect Incorporation Impact Impect [ 1 [ ] [ 1 [X] CECA Checl<llst 4/99 I . e . File No.: GP 02-001 . Less Than Significant Potentielly With Less Then Significant Mitlgetion Significant No Impect Incorporation Impect Impact support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? [ ] [ I [l [Xl c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? [ ] [ 1 [l [Xl d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the site or area, including through the alteration of l!1e course of a, stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or off-site? [ 1 [ 1 [ l, [Xl e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? [ 1 [ 1 [l [Xl I) Otherwise substantially degrade water qualify [ 1 [ 1 [J [Xl g) Place housing within a 1 DO-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? [ 1 [ 1 [J [XI h) Place structures within a 1 DO-year flood hazard area, which would impede or redirect flood flows? [ 1 [ 1 [l [Xl i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? [ ] [ ] [] [Xl j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? [ ] [ ] [l [XI The proposed 9 residential units will not result in an increase in the potential for the exposure of people or property to flooding hazards. IX. LAND USE & PLANNING -Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? [ 1 [ ] [l [X] b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose'of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? [ 1 [ 1 [l [Xl c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? [ 1 [ 1 [l [X] The project and the eventual development of the proposed g residential units will not result in any of the above impacts. X: MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availabilify of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? [ 1 [ ] [l [Xl b) Result In the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? [ 1 [ ] [] [X] The project and the eventual development of the proposed 9 residential units will not result in any of the above impacts. XI, NOISE - Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? [ 1 [ 1 [Xl [l Form "J' -8. ceOA Checklist 4199 . e b) Exposure of persons to, or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? [ ] [ ] [X] [] c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? [ ] [ ] [I [Xl d) A substantiallemporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? [ I [ I [Xl [J e) For a project located within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? [ I [ ] [I [X] f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working In the project area to excessive noise levels? [ I [ I [I [X] The project itseij will not result in any of the above impacts, but the eventual development of the proposed 9 residential units wiil result in additional noise during construction, but such should not be substantially above existing ambient noise levels. XII. POPULATION & HOUSING - Wouldlhe project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an araa, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? [ ] [ I [XI (I b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of repiacement housing elsewhere? [ I [ ] [X] [I c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? [ ] [ ] [] [Xl The project and the eventual development of the proposed 9 residential units wiil not result in any of the above impacts. XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES - Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? [ I [ ] [I [X] b) Police protection? [ I [ ] [] [X] c) Schools? [ ] [ ] [XI [] d) Parks? [ ] [ ] [Xl [] e) Other public facilities? [ I [ ] [I [X] The project and the eventual development of the proposed 9 residential units wiil not result in any of the above impacts. XIV. RECREATION - Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facllify would occur or be accelerated? [ ] [ ] [I [X] b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an ,adverse physical effect on' the environment? [ ] [ I [I [Xl Form .J. -9. CECA Checklist 4/99 .. I . XVI. - " , \ e .. . File No.: GP 02-001 Less Than Significant Potentielly With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact The project and-the eventual development of the proposed 9 residential units will not resuit in any of the above impacts. TRANSPORTATION I TRAFFIC - Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result ina subs1antial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume,to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? [ ] [ 1 [Xl [l b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? [ 1 [ 1 [l [Xl c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, inciuding either an Increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? I 1 I 1 . I) IX) d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous Intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? [ 1 [ 1 [l [Xl e) Result in inadequate emergency access? I 1 I 1 [l [X) f) Result In inadequate parking capacity? [ ] I 1 [l [Xl g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? [ ] [ 1 I 1 [X) The project and the eventual development of the proposed 9 residential units will not result in any significant impacts. UTILITIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? [ ] [ 1 [l IX) b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? [ 1 I ] [l [X] c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities. the construction of which could cause Significant environmental effects? [ 1 [ ] [1 [Xl d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? [ 1 [ 1 [l [Xl el Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the providers existing commitments? [ 1 [ 1 I 1 IX] f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? I 1 [ ] [] IX) g) Comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? [ ] [ ] [] [X] The project and the eventual development of the proposed 9 residential units will not result In any of the above impacts. XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or XV. Form'.J. .10- CEQA Checklist 4/99 H . " - './ .'. . . File No.: GP 02-001 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mltlgetlon Slgniffcant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrictthe range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califomia history or prehistory? [ ] [ ] [l [X] b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed In connection with the effects of past projects. the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) [ 1 [ 1 [l [Xl c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? [ 1 [ 1 [l [Xl The project and the eventual development of the proposed 9 residential units will not result in any of the above impacts. XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES No earlier analyses, and no additional documents were referenced pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA processes to analyze the project. Form 'J' -11- CEOA Checklist 4199 , . . . ;:.~ December 27, 2001 . // MEMO TO: TOM LI PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: 1~ SUBJECT: TOM HIGHAM PUBLlI;; WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT 1510-1516 SOUTH BALDWIN AVENUE GP 2002-001 The following are our comments on the above referenced project. 1. Fire protection requirements, including fire hydrants, shall be as stipulated by the Arcadia Fire Department. 2. If the designation of the fire sprinkler system Is NFPA 13-0 or 13-R, separate backflow preventers shall be installed at the point of connection between the domestic water supply riser to each unit and the fire sprinkler system. Ifthe fire sprinkler system Is designated NFPA 13, a Double Check DetectorAssembly shall be installed with a separate water service. 3. Backflow preventers on the fire sprinkler system shall be as approved by the Arcadia Water Section. Installation location shall also be as approved by the Arcadia Water Section. 4. A separate, new domestic water service shall be required for each unit. Installation of all water services shall be by the Developer. Installation shall be according the specifications of the Public Works Services Department, Engineering Section. Demolition of existing water services, if any, shall be by the Developer, according to Public Works Services Department, Engineering Section specifications. ~ 5. A Water Meter Clearance Application, filed with the Arcadia Water Section, shall be required prior to permit issuance to ensure adequate meter/service size. 6. No water service lateral, meter, flush-out, backflow prevention device or fire hydrant may be located in any driveway nor may be closer than 3 feet from the top of "x" of any driveway or other utility. 7. All backflow devices shall be screened from public view. The screening is subject to Planning Department approval. 8. A separate water meter will be required for the irrigation system. The irrigation system shall be installed in accordance with the requirements of the Uniform Plumbing Code and Arcadia City Ordinances. Backflow protection shall be a reduced pressure backflow preventer. 9. All pipe, valves, hydrants, meters, fittings, and appurtenances, including disinfection and flushing, shall meet the specifications of the Arcadia Public Works Department, Engineering and Water Sections. 10. Water services and water meters shall be installed in the location marked on the curb, or as otherwise Indicated. Any deviation from this requirement must be approved in advance of installation. ,. _ TH:th .- - .' IZ-Itl-o! . . MEMORAND1Th'~ DEVELOPr<IENT SERVlOS DEPARThIENT ( ) Fire, ( ) Police, ( ) PW-Sewer. ( ) PW-Streets, WW-Water, TOIVt 8. ( ) PW.NPDES/SUSMP, To: ( ) Building, ( ) Econ. Dev., ( ) Engineering, Prom: Planning Services, --=rCM Li Subject: A.pplicatlon No.: M f' '2ro2- - Of) I Location: l!)IO - I b BA-L.:bWIl.J /WE:. Project Description: 6eN~ flhJ ~1: FfcM ~Il4Mr;,z.cJ1\1.-- 'lD ~I j)erJ'(lA-t.- 'fOte.. A- Ce>NbGl f~J~ Please review the attached proposal and provide comments and/or conditions of approval for the following checked items and any other item(s) with which you may have concerns or special knowledge: ( ) Dedications ( ) NPDES/SUSMP ( ) Legal description yr Water services ( ) Traffic. parking design', circulation, visibility, etc. ( ) Irrigation system ( ) Parkway width(s) ( ) 8acktlow devices -location, size, etc. . ~treet lights, sidewalks, curb & gutter, etc. ( ) Fire hydrants, sprinklers, alarms, etc. . ,entative ParceliTrac: Map contents ( ) Fire safety, access, exiting, etc. .'( ) Final Map contents ( ) Occupancy limits , ( ) Location and design of driveway(s) and apron(s) ( ) Accessibility (;..oAlTitle 24) ( ) Encroachment into a special setback on: ( ) Compliance with Building Codes ( ) Crime Prevention & Public Security ( ) Architectural des{gn ( ) Consistency with Redeve!opment Plan ( ) Grading, drainage and erosion control ( ) Street trees & plants ( ) Is the s~bject address served by a sewer line that Is tributary to a deilcient City trunk line? ( ) Other: Notes: A Consultation Meeting is scheduled for --1:::I/A Your attendance is re,quested ( ) Yes I ( ) No Please provide your written response by I /4/02- <;e.e... ~d.uO- ~ Thank you for your assistance. " Response: - ~-+ Date: {)L.c..;2../, '-'oof , " By: , - . 12- tfJ-OI . . To: ( ) Fire, ( ) Police, ( ) PW-Sewer. ( ) Building, ( ) Econ. De'l.. ( ) Enginellring, . MEMORANDUM DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT &N-Streets, ])ME;. T. ( ) PW-Water, ( ) PW-NPOES/SUSMP. From: Planning Services, _/(';WI L, Subject: Application No.: fr P '2.ro2 - 0" I Location: \ 1;/0 - I" BAWlWIN AVe. Project Description: 6eN€{ZAL... flPcN ~~ ~/'11. Ce>1l1/I.ll<i'<<tAt.--- 'lD ~I beNTlAt.. 'fOte.. A- (eo,..(be> fl2cJECT Please review the attached proposal and provide comments and/or conditions of approval for the following checked items and any other item(s) with which you may have concerns or special knowledge: ( ) Dedications ( ) Legal description ( ) Traffic, parking design,. circulation, visibility, etc. (.) Parkway width(s) Wtreet lights, sidewalks, curb <. gutter. elc. '-entatlve ParcelfTract Map contents . ( ) Final Map contents ( ) Location and design of driveway(s) and apron(s) ( ) Encroachment Into a special satback an: ( ) Grading, drainage and erosion control .vr'Street trees & plants ( ) Is the subject address served by a sewer line that Is tributary to a deficient City trunk line? Notes: ( ) NPOES/SUSMP ( ) Water services ( ) Irrigation system ( ) 8ackftow devices - location, size, etc. ( ) Fire hydrantS, sprinklers, aiarms, etc. ( ) Fire safety, access, exiting, etc. ( ) Occupancy limits . ( ) Accessibility (ADA/Title 24) ( ) Compliance with Building Codes ( ) Crfme Prevention & Public Security ( ) Architectural design ( ) Consistency with Rede'lelopment Plan ( ) Other: A Consultation Meeting is scheduled for J/A Please provide your written response by [/4/ o'Z.. Response: /Vo sjf'\.l..~ trll.f (''jll\'rt-~ Your attendance is re.quested ( ) Yes I ( ) No Thank you for your assistance.. . ',. '/?t- --?+- , 8y: Date: 10'/0 I ~ _ /2-lfl-OI . . MEMORANDUM DEv~LOP~ITNTSERVICESDEPART~~T ( ) Fire, ( ) Police, ( ) PW-Sewer, ( ) PW-Streets, ( ) PW-Water, WW-NPOES/SUSMP,I~jn$'tJ'f To: ( ) BuildIng, ( ) Econ. Dev., ( ) EngIneering, From: Planning Services, -Tt:M Li Subject: AppiicatIon No.: fr P ?.../Xl2. - Of) I Location: \ t:;/O - [b BA-L.1>WIN AVE:. Project Description: 6e1JE\2Ill-- l'/PlIJ ~t, ~M CelIl1M~At.-- "lO ~I DeNlIAt..- 'fOrL, A- (oNM fe.:.JEa' Please review the attached proposal and provide comments andlor conditions of approval for the following checked items and any other item(s) with which you may have concerns or special knowledge: ( ) Dedications .kf NPDES/SUSMP ( ) Legal description ( ) Water services ( ) Traific, parking design,. circulation, visibility, etc. ( ) Irrigation sysiem ( ) Parkway width(s) ( ) 8ackflow devices - location, size, etc. . _Street, lights, sidewalks. curb & gutter. etc. ( ) Fire hydrants, sprinklers. alarms, etc. '-entetlve ParcelfTrac: Map contents ( ) Fire sofely, access, exiting. elc. , { ) Final Map contents ( ) Occupancy limits , ( ) Location and design of driveway(s) and apron(s) ( ) Accessibility (ADAJTitle 24) ( ) Encroachment Into a special setback on: ( ) Compliance with Building Codes ( ) Crime Prevention & PUblic Security ( ) .A.rchliecturel design ( ) Consistency with Rede'ielopment Plan ( ) Grading, drainage and erosion control ( ) Street trees & plants ( ) Is the subjectaddrsss served by a sewer line that is tributary to a deficient City trunk line? ( ) Other: Notes: A Consultation Meeting Is scheduled for -1:l IA Your attendance is.re,qaested ( ) Yes / ( ) No -.A1. I . Response: In,MI"""1 prqJuf l /4! 02- Thank you for your assistance. R~U( 'reAn ~i:S Please provide your written response by ~ub ~ Date: /2 It! !f) , .'