HomeMy WebLinkAbout1660
-
.'
e.,
,
.~
RESOLUTION NO. 1660
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
APPLICATION NO. CUP 01-026 FOR A PRE-SCHOOL AND
DAYCARE CENTER AT 657 W. DUARTE ROAD.
WHEREAS, on August 27, 2001, an application was filed by Carlos and
Elizabeth Andrino for a pre-school and daycare center; Development Services
Department Case No. CUP 01-026, at 657 W. Duarte Road, more particularly
described as follows:
The westerly 75.17 feet of the easterly 150.34 feet of Tract No. 3430, in
the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as per
map recorded in Map Book 42, Page 32 in the Office of the County
Recorder of Said County.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on November 27,2001, at which time
all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present
evidence.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the factual data submitted by the Development Services
Department in the attached report dated November 27, 2001 is true and correct.
SECTION 2. This Commission finds:
A. That the granting of this Conditional Use Permit would be detrimental to
the public health and welfare and injurious to the property and improvements in such
zone or vicinity.
1. The proposed parking and loading facilities are inadequate and unsafe,
particularly in the case where small children are to be dropped-off and picked-up in a
parking area.
2. The potential traffic that could be generated by the proposed use would
result in an unacceptable Level Of Service (LOS) on Duarte Road, at the intersection
of Duarte Road and Baldwin Avenue, and on other surrounding streets and
intersections, which would have negative effects upon the properties, businesses
and residents that must use those public rights-of-way.
-
.
~
.\ ~.
B. That the use applied for at the location indicated is properly one for which
a Conditional Use Permit is authorized, however, the applicants did not satisfy the
Special Regulations for the requested conditional use as specified in Sections
9275.3 et seq. of the Arcadia Municipal Code.
1. The required written proof from the State Department of Social Services
verifying its approval of the site, the use of structures on the site and maximum
number of children for which a license will be issued, had not been provided.
2. The applicants explained that it was anticipated that up to a maximum of
125 children would be accommodated at the proposed pre-school and daycare
center throughout the day, and that they intended to provide after school programs
for the children of the local elementary schools. However, it was not specified how
many children of what ages, Would be accommodated at the pre-school and daycare
center at what times of day, and how the elementary school students would be
transported to the proposed facility.
3. The proposed site plan does not provide adequate off-street parking, nor
does it provide adequate facilities for the safe loading and unloading of children.
C. That the site for the proposed use is not adequate in size and shape to
accommodate the proposed use, and all yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking,
loading, landscaping and other features required to adjust said use with the land and
uses in the neighborhood.
1. The applicants' proposal to provide parking spaces for the pre-school and
daycare employees by leasing eight parking spaces on the upper parking level of the
Burlington Coats Factory shopping center at 1201 S. Baldwin Avenue is not
acceptable for the following reasons:
a. These parking spaces are at least 700 feet away and would necessitate
that the employees cross both Duarte Road and Baldwin Avenue.
b. The proposed off-site parking location exceeds the 500-foot maximum
distance allowed by Arcadia Municipal Code Section 9269.6 for the use of off-site
parking spaces to satisfy the parking requirement of a proposed use.
c. The location of parking spaces is not included in the regulations
authorized to be modified by Arcadia Municipal Code Section 9292.1.4.
-2-
1660
-
.
~
2. That the proposed layout will not function adequately because of the
following situations:
a. It relies on a single 25-foot Wide driveway for both ingress and egress,
which is less than 300 feet from the intersection of Duarte Road and Baldwin
Avenue. This intersection has a Level Of Service (LOS) of 'D' and is one of the most
congested intersections in the City, and the delays at that intersection often cause
traffic to backup beyond the driveway on the subject property, which would block
vehicles from entering and exiting the subject property.
b. The proposed layout necessitates the use of parking spaces for the
dropping-off and picking-up of children, which is both unsafe and inefficient.
c. It will require that vehicles perform a multi-point turn to exit the site, which
requires that arriving vehicles wait for the exiting vehicles to clear the parking area.
Such delays could result in gridlock in the parking area, which could potentially back
out onto Duarte Road and add to the already significant traffic delays and hazards.
D. That the site abuts a street that is not adequate in width to carry the kind
of traffic that would be generated by the proposed use. The proposed use could
generate approximately 100 vehicle trips during both the morning and evening rush
hours, which would result in further diminishing the Levels Of Service (LOS) on
Duarte Road, at the intersection of Duarte Road and Baldwin Avenue, and on other
surrounding streets and intersections.
E. That the evaluation of the environmental impacts as set forth in the initial
study is appropriate and that the project could have less than a significant effect
upon the environment within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act
of 1970, if appropriate mitigation measures were incorporated, but none were
provided, and therefore, a Mitigated Negative Declaration could not be approved.
SECTION 3. That for the foregoihg reasons this Commission denies
Conditional Use Permit Application No. CUP 01-026 for a pre-school and daycare
center at 657 W. Duarte Road.
SECTION 4. The decision and findings contained in this Resolution reflect
the Planning Commission's action of November 27, 2001 to deny Conditional Use
Permit Application No. CUP 01-026, by the following vote:
-3-
1660
-
e-
~,
AYES: Commissioners Baderian, Huang, Murphy and Olson
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Kalemkiarian
SECTION 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution
and shall cause a copy to be forwarded to the City Council of the City of Arcadia.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that this Resolution No. 1660 was adopted at a regular
meeting of the Planning Commission held on December 11, 2001, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners Huang, Murphy, Olson and Kalemkiarian
None
Commissioner Bader/an
Chairm n, Pia Ing Commission
City of rcadia
cretary, Planning Commission
City of Arcadia
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
.
~P.jJ~
Stephen P. Deitsch, City Attorney
City of Arcadia
-4-
1660
STAFF REPORT
DEVELOPMENTSER~CESDEPARTMENT
November 27, 2001
TO: Arcadia City Planning Commission
FROM: Donna L. Butler, Community Development Administrator
By: James M. Kasama, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Application No. CUP 01-026 for a pre-school
and daycare center at 657 W. Duarte Road.
SUMMARY
.'
This Conditional Use Permit application was submitted by Carlos and Elizabeth
Andrino to operate a pre-school and daycare center for up to 125 children, ages 2 to
12 years old at 657 W. Duarte Road.' The Development Services Department is
recommending denial of application no. CUP 01-026 because of inadequate parking
and traffic facilities.
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANTS: Carlos and Elizabeth Andrino
LOCATION: 657 W. Duarte Road
REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit to allow a pre-school and daycare center
for up to 125 children, ages 2 to 12 years old in a 7,000 square foot
commercial building. The proposed hours of operation are from
6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday through Friday.
SITE AREA: 18,672 sq. ft. (0.43 acre)
FRONTAGE: Approximately 76 feet along W. Duarte Road
~
,
EXISTING LAND USE & ZONING:
The site is developed with a one-story, 7,000 square foot
commercial building. There are 26 substandard on-site parking
spaces. The property is zoned C-21General Commercial.
SURROUNDING LAND USES & ZONING:
Nor t h : Offices and retail - zoned C-2
South: Bank and offices - zoned C-2
E a s t : Retail - zoned C-2
W es t : Parking lot - zoned C-2
--
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial
BACKGROUND
This case was initially scheduled to be heard at the October 9,. 2001 Planning
Commission meeting. Staff's review identified numerous deficiencies and problems
with the proposed site plan. The applicants requested a continuance to address
staff's concerns. The Planning Commission continued the hearing on this
application to the November 27,2001 meeting.
PROPOSAL AND ANALYSIS
The proposal is to operate a pre-school and daycare center in a 7,000 square foot
commercial building at 657 W. Duarte Road. The children will be ages 2 years .
through 12 years old, and the applicants anticipate that the State will approve their
proposal for a total of up to 125 children. The proposed hours of operation are from
6:30a.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday through Friday.
The .interior of the. building will be remodeled to provide four large classroom/play
areas, two offices with a lobby and waiting area, a computer learning room, and a
pantrylkitchen room. There are al.so several restroom facilities and two large
storage rooms. A 1,825 square foot outdoor play area is proposed to be provided
adjacent to the rear ofthe building.
The parking area will be re-striped to accommodate this outdoor play area, and the
parallel parking spaces along the driveway will be eliminated to enable two-way
traffic in the driveway. The new site configuration will provide 12 on-site parking
spaces (the #8 was skipped on the proposed plot plan) and one parking space, #7 is
designated for loading and unloading. The applicants also have an agreement with
the owner of the Burlington Coats Factory shopping center, to lease eight parking
spaces on the upper parking level for the pre-school and daycare employees. This
would provide a total of 20 parking spaces.
The application is requesting a daycare center with infant, pre-school, and before
and after school care programs for approximately 125 children with approximately 12
adult employees. Based on this information, it must be assumed for the purposes of ~
CUP 01-026
November 27, 2001
Page 2
-
.
~
analyzing traffic impacts, that all 125 children could be dropped-off and then picked
up during the respective morning and evening commute hours. The impacts of such
a scenario on Duarte Road would be unacceptable. The City's Traffic Engineer has
provided research data that indicates that daycare centers generate 0.80 vehicle
trips per child during rush hours (see the attached memorandum dated 11114101).
This equals 100 vehicles arriving during the morning rush hours, and 100 vehicles
arriving during the evening rush hours. .
The applicants have explained that they anticipate their proposed facilities will
accommodate up to a maximum of 125 children throuchout the day, and that they
intend to provide after school programs for the children of the local elementary
schools. However, it has not been specified how many children of what ages, will be
at the facility at what times of the day, and it is not clear how the elementary school
students will be transported from their schools to the applicants' facility.
Staff is also concerned by the proposed plot plan. This layout is in response to the
deficiencies and problems that staff identified prior to the October 9th meeting (e.g.;
lack of a safe drop-off & pick-up area, substandard parking spaces, the need for a
trash enclosure). Staff, however, still feels that the proposed layout will not function
well for a daycare center.
Because there is only one driveway, vehicles must turn around to exit the subject
property, and the proposed layout necessitates the use of a parking space to
perform drop-offs and pick-ups. The maneuvering necessary to exit the property will
cause delays for those that are arriving. And, if there are too many vehicles arriving
and leaving at one time, there could be gridlock in the parking area, and potentially a
backup all the way out onto Duarte Road.
Most daycare centers have an on-site circulation system that provides for efficient
ingress and egress that minimizes maneuvering. Staff has prepared the attached
rough sketch of a circular driveway that might work at the subject property. Staff
thinks that the design of the proposed facility still needs to be worked on, and
evaluated as recommended by the City's Traffic Engineer.
Additionally, Section 9275.3.1 of the Arcadia Municipal Code requires that at the
time a conditional use permit application is submitted for a nursery school, written
proof of State approval of the site, the use of the structure and the maximum number
of children shall be submitted. The applicants have not provided this documentation.
CEQA
Pursuant to the prOVISions of the California Environmental 'Quality Act, the
Development Services Department has prepared an Initial Study for the proposed
project. Said Initial Study did not disclose any substantial or potentially substantial
CUP 01-026
November 27, 2001
Page 3
adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the e
project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise and objects of
historical or aesthetic significance that could not be made less than significant with
mitigation incorporation. When considering the record as a whole, there is no
evidence that the proposed project will have any potential for adverse effect on
wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Therefore, a
Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project. The mitigation
measures would be those that address the potential parking and traffic impacts.
FINDINGS
Section 9275.1.2 of the Arcadia Municipal Code requires that for a Conditional Use
Permit to be granted, it must be found that all of the following prerequisite conditions
can be satisfied:
1. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the
public health or welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such
zone or vicinity.
2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is properly one for which a
Conditional Use Permit is authorized.
e
3. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate said use, and all yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking, loading,
landscaping, and other features required to adjust said use with the land and
uses in the neighborhood.
4. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type
to carry the kind. of traffic, generated py the proposed use.
5. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will no.t adversely affect the
comprehensive General Plan. .
RECOMMENDATION
The Development Services Department recommends denial of Conditional Use
Permit Application No. CUP 01-026, because the proposed plans for the proposed
use are not adequate to accommodate the necessary parking and the pick-up and
drop-off of students.
If the Planning Commission determines that based on the evidence presented this is
an appropriate use at this site and moves to approve Conditional Use Permit ....
Application No. CUP 01-026, staff recommends the following conditions of approval: i ",
CUP 01-026
November 27, 2001
Page 4
-
-
-
1. The occupancy and tenant improvements for the pre-school and daycare center
shall be in compliance with the Building and Fire Codes, which shall be
determined by having detailed construction plans submitted for plan check
review and approval.
2. Occupancy of the pre-school and daycare center shall not exceed 125 children,
or less if required by the Building Official, Fire Marshal, or the State. The facility
shall be operated and maintained in a manner that is consistent with the
application materials and plans submitted and approved for CUP 01-026.
3. If off-site parking is included in the approval of CUP 01-026, a covenant per
Section 9269.6, in a form approved by the City Attorney, must be executed by
the property owner, recorded in the Office of the County Recorder, and shall be
kept in effect for as long as the pre-school and daycare center is in operation.
4. There shall be no parking or stopping in the driveway. Signs prohibiting such
shall be posted. on and along both sides of the driveway at a minimum of 25-foo.t
intervals.
5. Before a City Business License will be issued, the applicants shall provide
written proof of the State's approval of the site, the use of the structure, and the
maximum number of children.
6. This approval of CUP 01-026 shall not take effect until the property owner and
applicants have executed and filed an Acceptance Form available from the
Development Services Department to indicate awareness and acceptance of the
conditions of approval.
7. Noncompliance with the plans, provisions and conditions of approval for
CUP 01-026 shall be grounds for immediate suspension and/or revocation of
any approvals and occupancies granted by CUP 01-026, which could result in
the closing of the pre-school and daycare center.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Denial
The Planning Commission should move to deny Conditional Use Permit
Application No. CUP 01-026 because the proposal cannot satisfy all of the
required prerequisite conditions for a Conditional Use Permit, and direct staff
to prepare a resolution incorporating the Commission's decision and specific
findings.
CUP 01-026
November 27,2001
Page 5
Approval
If the Planning Commission intends to approve Conditional Use Permit Application
No. CUP 01-026, the Commission should move to adopt the Mitigated Negative
Declaration, state the supporting findings, and direct staff to prepare a resolution
incorporating the Commission's decision, specific findings, and any conditions of
approval (i.e., mitigation measures).
-
If any Planning Commissioner, or other interested party has any questions or
comments regarding this matter prior to the November 27th public hearing, please
contact Senior Planner. Jim Kasama at (626) 574-5445.
.---?
~~. . .-:~
". ~ t....-:;;
~h... -
na L. Butler
Community Development Administrator
(
e
Attachments: Land Use & .Zoning Map
AeriarPhoto of657 W. Duarte Road
Aeriai Photo ofthe vicinity of 657 W. Duarte Road
Applicant's Project Description & Plans
Parking agreement with Golden West Properties
Nov. 14,2001 Memorandumfrom City's Traffic Engineer
Rough sketch of possible circular driveway
Negative Declaration & Initial Study with photos of subject property
~
CUP 01-026
November 27, 2001
Page 6
-
ARCAD\A AVE
C-2 ~:>T. <;5
OJ
"':
..... Wells ...
'" :<
Helmo's 0 Fargo
Burgers Bank
~jl.~~ C-2 C-2
3,n/l.4
ARCADIA H-4
AVE.
Beau\)' Mixed Mixed ,
Spa commercial ~ .n eommevCl~1
..
II>
-
. Blockbuster
Videos u.i
> 'lO1.~
C-2 <C
IHOP Z
!!! ::
<i Q Gas r-'
-oj
<C Station
/.Xl
""",,0\ r;(l.G'2
gas stal\Oll
OUARTE RO. (",8) . .
eeau\)' "....., (Q40)
(r.tQ)
sa\OllS eal-Fed
World Ban\(. C-2 medical
Burlington Savings 4-story offices
Coal FIICtoIy office H-4
Benk C-2 bldg.
LAND USE & ZONING MAP
- Application No: CUP 01-026 t NORTH
657 W. Duarte Road Scale: 1 inch = 100 feet
\
--
AElR~Al PHoro
657 W. Duarte Road
Application No: CUP 01-026.
t .-
NORTH I No Scale
e
Subject Property
AfER~Al PHOTO
Vicinity of 657 W. Duarte Road
e Application No: CUP 01-026 t NORTH I No Scale
.If .If Elizabeth & Carlos Andrino .If ..,.
~ ..,. Savant Kids (Project) .If ~
Jf Jf Jf 550 Catalpa Rd. Arcadia, Ca. 91007 ..,. ~ ..,.
Jf ..,. Tel: 626-254-9302 Fax: 626-294-9349 ..,. .J{-
IRECIEBVIED
e
NOW 0 S 2001
Dear Major and Council Committee:
Dt~rojopmDn1 SerVices
Camllll"'lr! n,..lo~:n.1l1 Divllllon
The reason for this letter is to thank each of you for recognizing bur young Startlight
Arcadians as Citizens of the month for the city of Arcadia. Weare proud to live and
participate in a community that recognizes the importance that our young have in the
future of the world and the need to motivate and educate them accordingly. I la)ow my
little ones. have truly been motivated in being recognized by the leaders of our I
community. I also wanted to take this opportunity to let you know about future plans that
we are contemplating.in doing, in the city of Arcadia.
On November 13th we will be meeting again since we are applying for a conditional use
permit to operate a Day Care Center in Arcadia. We wish to serve children from 2 years ..
of age to 12 years or age. We wanted to write to you and let you know the reasons for ..
wanting to open up a business in Arcadia and what our intentions are. Being parents
ourselves we've seen the dilemma that young families face when both parents muSt work
and extra curricular activities are not accessible. because of work schedules or economic
reasons. We've recognized that there is a need not just in Arcadia but also in all cities for
quality and reasonably priced Day Cares that will want to take accountability into their
programs. Our plans for the day care center is to provide access to all children by
providing an enrichment program in an after school setting. We want to implement art,
music, civic responsibility knowing that .this will affect not just the children but everyone
that they may come in contact with; as youngsters or as future adults. I created an
enrichment program two years ago that was implemented at Pleasant View Elementary in
Baldwin Park. It was a program that taught children the values, differences arid
.similarities that all countries have, The children learned about art, culture and history that
has contributed to the importance of our world as a whole. Among some of the artists
studied have been Mozart, Picasso, Degas etc... Our studies have also included famous
composers such as Bach, Vivaldi and my personal favorite Beethoven that despite his
handicap as deaf adult was still able to compOse beautiful symphonies. It makes the soul
stronger when you hear about adversities that others might have faced or had, and how
'they were able to overcome them. It's been a program that has impacted our young
learners.. Now that we are part of this community and our children are attending Arcadia
schools, we have started piloting the program after school at Hugo Reid Elemeiltary. It is
a program that we will implement into our Day Care, facility as well. We truly believe in ilIA
the strength and unity of a community and the impact this has on its citizens. That's why WI'
we want to work where we live. This gives,you more reasons to try to be the best that you
e
e
e
can possibly be because you owe it to your neighbors, friends and family. We want to
work closely with Arcadia's Unified School District agenda for they're young; being an
extension for the school and their academic goals. We feel strongly that our community
has so much to offer all children, not just academically but in terms of installing self-
esteem and responsibility for themselves and their world. That's why it's important that
our young get involved in positive and healthy activities so that they may represent our
community proudly in the future; in whatever field they may choose to work in. ~t is
unfortunate that some children that are in an after school setting cannot participate in
enrichment programs. That's why we want to bridge the gap and make enrichment
programs accessible to all children. It is a reality of life that most families have both
parents working. These are issues that we must deal with in our contemporary world. I'm
positive that we can have a strong impact in our community and their future citizens. I
hope that you will consider our application for Ii conditional use permit as a valuable and
needed service to our Arcadian community. We thank you for your consideration and for
your valuable service as exemplary leaders of Arcadia.
Sincerely
---'= .. '1 /; / -
c: 7/rtf~k.?t (j.;,L'L/lIJ
Elizabeth & Carlos Andrino
~ ~,~t.- c::(
SA V ANT (sa-vanl') n. A learned scholar. IFr. <pr.part. of sOI'oir, to know < VLat. *sapere, < Lat.
sopere, to he wise..1
"lleause die .Nicience'is So underil.
able. iaw enforcemem: has lieen per-
_de<! dlndlis is . serious piece of
the .crime-llgbdng ....enaI.. says
Maryann O"SuUivan. st:ar.e,din!ctor of
Rght Crime: I.....t in.KIds California.
an organization made up of scue
sheriffs. poIice'chiefs. -efisuict attor-
neys and aime viaims.
According to die repor't, the benefits
of quality after-sdlOol programs go' "
beyond Iaoeping.kicis out of ~!e."
- :"We see so few adults at home after
school. and this is . change.. says
. Sanger.
MosdAUSO afterCsdlOol programs
,
e
Quality ~hooJ progriims can
keep kids safe as wa!JI' as inCreaSe
their 'academic succeSs.: accordinz
to a recent,'~dy.. .' .
are.set up,Jn.Sc:hools wimja majority
pc;piilatjon' of io~cin'eooje;tu:nriieS.", -
But ad -, "',' .inili~eindk
,<-~say_... .. -,- )'
,mim~,o(~t.Worldng arid
single..parent .~eS createS' a need
FooSuch p~'uaU"schoOJs. " :
~ieS$ '~f,~'~LStu~t'PoPu~.-,'
~~(~~'c:~~t;us;.:. .,",:~,;:"
. ;" ." ~ ,'d' ,':. .
"E.cp.nding .-SdioOJj,rogr.ins
just makas sense. not only for die
safety of the igJdents. bUi fat: aca.
demics'and die "rieigbborhood:' says
~get;'~.':.. ..l ~~;, . ~,
. - Marilpl.Mnninet
~ _ ,-,..'.~"'..I.I".::lI-~=".'.' _.........:r....:"IClI"IC'W...:..::s..._.:x_.........._
TL._~ D__ .1:'___..1_4:_1
~
e
e
~-..
\ -
\ \iir.:
~ ..-r-ff' \=~
,
...
I " ~
,
\ F i
.
\\
rl
-
.;
\ "
.\ .. I
,
"
\
\ -
\ !--
<::>
c::>
f'UiTJ>U.Jol1.<JCDl
(1IQ.lOliIil::f;"l.!lRAWlNC$
e
Iri ~_~T
,-.'-0'
'1'-<1"
,
i . J'i'r
rt:,~. I
i ~ .
.. .
~ . ~. . -
PLA~,-t~:~:
1,a2SSQIfl CI
~ I.....
t. - .
,
roo
f'.. k::::; ~~
,..... """'""
(7,MJso.;n,)
!M
~-,~ - ~
(:J
c:>
PfIa>orrfUHtJ-
H :td.71"
PLOT PLAN
Pro ros-e4
0).
EJ
l. "L~. '"
8I.OCXuu.
l>-0'1itOH
(TTP.)
.
1C4..5T
1-2O'(11"-fo"
.
I ..
I "
I &-~~-cr
I "
,...".
/p'OS'[IlT'flM:
""""'"
''-'
.".
(.,&0 so,...",
{). V
~
'e
1-10'~ 'I'-~'
, I
, I
, I
.
..
. I 5
~ .
" ~
, I
5--20'Jl'"-o"
. I
=:: I
,
1_1D'_uO_6"
~~~
I
T
PROPOSED DAY CARE CENTER
657 W. DU"ARTE RD.
ARCADIA. CA 91006
BY: FRANOSCO PACHECO
17054 IlARllAND ST.
VAN NUYS. CA 91406
0-
@
o
I
0)
I
o
I
o
I
!
,
I~r...o"
N"
",-r
$1'~Ir:'
8'-0'
2:1"_111"
Q..A'SSoI'l'OOWI
:tlOn"
j:--4
I' "
1\"
1'1\1
I, "
L_1
..
~:llrZ
wn"
r:--~
I' 'I
1\/1
1/,1
I, '\1
1:__1
...... ..,.
~
-.
~
'r~"
r...
~~ Is<oot-
,
".-r
W_r
.-r
r-r
",,-r
\
\
I.EGaO
\
-....
'e:p.~
f'al;'-UL....~IIlC.
..",.,""""
~
"'"
..
FLOOR PLAN-t. NA .: ~m~
-
e
@
I
@
I
I
,
rr-r .. ".-or
,I
I
"....
_o~
cu.SS-1l':lQIf3
...",
EJ
..
"--
Q.A..~'4
~-;:i4
2t:-r
"""'"
....- .....
""n'
no>
~.
-..... .
.~
l<
,.:,,:::.~:
. =
L:) ,;
.-<r
IfJICCII~~~or
,--
"'.........
PROPOSED DAY CARE CENTER
657 W. DUARTE RD.
ARCADiA. CA .91005
,
Il'I: FRANCSCO PAalECO
17054 ~ ST.
VAN N W 91406
.,
e
e
e
GOLDEN WEST PROPERTIES
REAL E$T.HE. I1E\'HtH:>.IF.:-;'T
October 26, 2001
Savant Kids
657 W. Duarte Road
Arcadia, CA 91006
Tel. No. (626) 254-9302
,,,e.O
'A. Eo C Eo.
~ a VI '1.\\\\\
\\0 snro,c:r.;. . .
_~.""",~n; ;;t<!~1l\~"1O
\1<1';: b,.;,-I
~...1-
Attention: Miss Elizabeth Androni
It is hereby mutuaIIy agreed between Golden West Properties and Savant Kids, that
Golden West Properties will lease 8 parking spaces on the upper parking level of the
Burlington Coat Factory for the use of employees of the Savant Kids.
The monthly rate for the use of the above spaces shall be set at $220/month. Tenant may
access and use the above parking spaces 24 hours a day, 7 days a week,
Landlord is not responsible for protection oftbe above automobile and tenant is requested
to provide insurance at their own cost and expense.
This Lease shall renew automaticaIIy, however either party has the right to cancel with
thirty days written notice.
If you agree with the above please sign below and mail us back one of the original copies.
~
~~/~-
;6
Tom Pashaie
Golden West Properties
Landlord
9255 SUNSET BOULEVARD . SUITE 620. WEST HOLL YWOOQ, CALIFORNIA 90069. TEL (310) 858-6797. FAX (310) 858-6862
\
)
.)
e
MEMORANDUM
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
DATE:
November 14,2001
TO:
Jim Kasama, Associate Planner
FROM:
Ed Cline, Traffic Engineer
SUBJECT: PROPOSED DAY CARE CENTER
657WEST DUARTE ROAD (CUP 01-026)
As requested, I have reviewed the material provided with regard to a proposed 125-
student day care facility at 657 West Duarte Road. e
According to widely accepted (Institute of Transportation Engineers) trip generation
data, the proposed project would generate over 100 vehicle trips per hour during both
the morning and afternoon peak. travel periods. For this reason I recommend that a
detailed traffic impact report be preparedt.{ a qualified traffic engineer. The issues that
should be covered in the report are:
. Potential traffic related impacts at' Baldwin Avenue and Duarte Road and at
Duarte Road and Holly Avenue.
. Site access onto Duarte Road, including the location of the driveway with respect
to Baldwin Avenue and left turn ingress and egress.
The traffic impact report should also include potential parking impacts and on-site
circulation. The existing parking lot contains 12 parking spaces plus one disabled stall.
The planned 12 employees may consume. the entire lot. Parent parking, student drop-
off/piek-up and related issues should be addressed. .
Attached for your information are copies of the trip generation tables for day eare
eenters.
e
e
Day Care,~Center
(565)
Average Vehicle Trip Ends .vs::. Students ,
. . On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m.
Number of Studies: 33
Average Number of Students: 61
Directional Distribution: 54% entering, 46% exiting
Trip Generation per Student
Average Rate Range of Rates
0.82 0.39 - 1.54
e
Standard Deviation
0.92
Data Plot and Equation
100 j
90 l'
. .'
..................................
....... ........ >/~... .1
.;.., . I'
,... ..,.,. .......-....
...x ./"
___< x
'"
'tl
c:
W
c-
.t:
I-
Ql
'0
:c
Ql
>
Ql
Cl
III
~
~
II
I-
801...... ........... .......:..
! ~...
I X
1 . "," I
70 J" ...... ......... ...:......:....xx.:--....~~~>/..:..
60 J . . . . . .". . . . . _. . . . .:. . . . x . .:. . .x. . . .:..,.< . .:. .
: x x , X.~,,,.....~""
. . x X
50 . .. .. . " . . . ... .: .. .. . . .:. . . .. . ..>'.. .. .:. .. l(. ..;K . . . .. . x..
, . ,......~
40 .... - . ':" .. )<' . -X' . . ','''''':" . . . .. . ';" . . . . . ":' .. . . ',.'
. -
. .
............,........-...
x .
30 j" '." J~>,.iX;... ..~.. .!....... .:....... .:...... x:...... ..:....... i....... i.......
20 ~ "_X~ .:......)(...... ......... -;....... -:....... ....... -:....... -:.......,.......
,. . . .
I X: : :
-10 . I I I I I I
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120
X = Number of Students
"
x Actuel Data Polnta
Fitted Curve
- - - - -- Average Rate
Fitted Curve EquatIon: T = 0.556(X) + 13.608
R2 = 0.61
Trip Generation, January 1991
844
Institute of Transportation Engineers
Day Care Center
(565)
e
Average Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Students
. On a: Weekday,
Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,
One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m.
Number of Studies: 33
Average Number of Students: 61
Directional Distribution: 46% entering, 54% exiting
Trip Generation per Student
Average Rate Range of Rates
0.83 0.24 - 1.72
,
Standard Deviation
0.95
Data Plot and Equation
'00 1
90
III
'0
C
W
Q.
'c
I-
III
i3
E
III
>
III
Cl
e
III
>
0(
II
r-
x
: ;--:<' I
... ~'.~~~"'>7'" i
///.,.......\
,.~" X
:. . . .:. . -;/~:. '. . ; . . . .,... . . .. . . : .
-:.,," ' x
. : x:.
...........;
e
x
. .
-............
....".-
I
1
80 ~
.>;(
x
. .
...........,-.....-..
.. . .:. .. ?<
70
. .
. . . . . . . . . . .
x
..
......--.....,..
60 ..........
-........1....
:x
x
x:
50
. .
...--........-.
.. ")i<"" .'... ':' -..... 5(" -. -. ~... - -..:
x:
. .
40 .' ..... .:. ....*..:.x. '" . ..... ..:...... ..:. ...... '.'
: x 0 .."',,, -,
~....",
30 ,..... .:... /~:....... ..:.. x...:.......;........;...... ...:...
. --
,
"
/
'.
,.... .
. .
. . ',- . . . . . . ~
.".-..-,...--..
. .
......,.............
. .
. .
20 . ...... .,. ,',.... _.. ,',.... '_" .'.. __
.... . , :
. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .
. , .
........,................-...
. . .
x
x x:
x.
10
20
40 50 60 70 eo
X = Number of Students
110
120
90
100
30
X Actual D_ PoInts .
FItted CUrve
------ Average Rete
e
Fitted Curve Equation: . T = 0.721 (X) + 5.699 ..J
~ = 0.62
Trip Generation, January 1991
845
Institute of Transportation Engineers
\
'"
\\
\
e
d-<
\
\
~
,
II
~
~ i:
lr-CJ"
\
~ ,,--
Ii!
<>
~
P"~!iT F'Uff 1AolCOf
IllOU QliliOlllo\&. DRA-.cs
"""""'"'"
t~'lIu~
tl,iXlOSQ,Jrq.
"1"-0':
PLOT PLAN
~~
_,-: ~ ~_.s:. ~
~ _ ~ 0....
~ ~
~ -{. \
... \. '\ "'\
, ~~~
~~
~
)
N~7'
H :1.11\'
Ifi6 -\ ..D- 0 c{
I rOJOo&e
/"<30' I
>r-<I'
~-1iV
~
<=>
~
~
,o:z.~"
~
~
<>
~.
~
~.
~
l
\
e
,
,
.
" ~
----='l
f"L
~~
PROPOSED DAY CARE CENTER
657 W. DU'ARTE RD.
ARCADIA. CA 91006
BY, fR^NOSCO P!l.Cl\ECO
17054 HARTl^ND st
VMI NU'IS. CA 91406
\
(I
File No.: CUP 01-026
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCAOIA, CA 91007
(626) 574-5400
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
e
A. Title and Description of Project:
Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 01-026
A Conditional Use Permit to allow a pre-school anddaycare center for up to 125 children. The
proposed houlS of operation are 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., Mondaythi'ough Friday.
B. Location of Project:
657 W. Duarte Road - In the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles
C. Name of Applicant, Project Sponsor, or Person Undertaking the Project:
Carlos and Elizabeth Andrino
550 Catalpa Road
Arcadia, CA 91007
Contact: Carlos or Elizabeth Andrino (626) 254-9302
The City Planning Commission, having reviewed the Initial Study of this proposed project and having
reviewed the written comments received prior to the pulilic hearing of the City Planning Commission.
including the recommendation of the City's staff. does hereby find and declare that thepl'Qposed project
will not have a significant effect on the environment A brief statement of the reaSons. supporting the City
Planning Commission's findings 15 as follows:
The conditional approval of the proposed project will mitigate the potential parking and traffic
impacts and will provide for conformance with the City's General Plan and Zoning Onlinance.
The City Planning Commission hereby finds that the Negative Declaration reflects its Independent
judgment A copy of the Initial Study may be.obtalned at:
Community Development Division
City of Arcadia
240 West Huntington Drive
Arcadia, CA 91007
(626) 574-5423
The location and custOdian of the documents and any other material that constitute the reconl of
proceedings upon which the City based its decision to adopt this Negative Declaration, are as follows:
Community Development Division
City of Arcadia
240 West Huntington Drive
Arcadia, CA 91007
(626) 574-5423
e
Date:
Signature
James M. Kasama, Senior Planner
(Printed name &lIUe)
Date Posted:
e
Caofomla Environmel1lal QuarJly Act
-Pagelofl-
Negatlve Declaration
e
e
e
Ale No.: eup 01-026
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. Project Title:
Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 01-026
2. Lead Agency Name & Address:
City of Arcadia
Development Services Dept. 1 Community Development Div. 1 Planning Services
240 W. Huntington Drive
Post Office Box 60021
Arcadia, CA 91066-6021
3. Lead Agency Contact Person & Phone Number:
James M. Kasama, Associate Planner- (626) 574-54451 fax (626) 447-9173
.-
4. Project Location laddress):
657 W. Duarte Road - In the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles
5. Project Sponsor's Name, Address & Phone Number:
Carlos and Elizabeth Andrino
550 Catalpa Road
Arcadia, CA 91007
Contact: Carlos or Elizabeth Andrino (626) 254-9302
6. General Plan Designation:
Commercial
7. Zoning Classification:
C-2: General Commercial
Form"J"
-1-
CEOA .eheckllst 4/99
File No.: CUP 01-026
8. Description of Project: a
(Oescrlbe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases oftha project, and any secondary, .,
support, or off.site features necassary for Its implementation.)
A Conditional Use Permit to allow a pre-school and daycare center for up to 125
children. The proposed hours of operation are 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday.
9. Surrounding land uses and setting:
(Briefly describe the project.s surroundings.)
The subject property is improved with a one-story, 7,000 square foot commercial
building and an open parking area. The area is developed with commercial uses.
Next door to the north and west is a commercial complex that faces Baldwin
Avenue. To the east is a Shopping center. To the south are commercial uses.
10. Other public agencies whose approval is required:
(e.g., permits, financing approval, participationagraement)
The City Building Services, Fire Prevention Bureau, and Water Services will review
any tenant improvements for compliance with all applicable construction codes.
The Engineering Division and Public Works Services will review any alterations to
the site for compliance with drainage and pollution control policies. The proposed ~
childcare facility will have to be approved by the State before a City Business ..
License will be issued.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this
project, involving at least one impact that is a 'Potentially Significant Impact" as
indicated by the checklist on the following pages:
[ ] Aesthetics
[ ] Agricultural Resources
[ ] Air Quality
[ ] Biological Resourees
[ ] Cultural Resources
[ ] Geology 1 Soils
[ ] Hazards & Hazardous Materials
[ ] Hydrology 1 Water Quality
[ ] Land Use I Planning
Form n JI.'
[ ] Mineral Resources
[ ] Noise
[ ] Population IHousing
[ ] Public Services
[ ] Recreation
[ ] Transportation I Traffie
[ ] Utilities 1 Service Systems
[ ] Mandatory Findings of Significance
-
-2-
eEQA eheckllst 4/99
e
e
e
File No.: eup 01-ll26
DETERMINATION:
(To be completed by tha Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
[I I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[XI I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions
in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[I I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
[I I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" .or
.potentially significant unless mitigated impact. on the environment, but at least
one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures
based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the
effects that remain to be addressed.
[I I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, but because all potentially significant effects (a) have been
analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant
to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing
further is required.
By: Donna L. Butler
Community Development Administrator
For: City of Arcadia
/7
. ~
.-.....'
Date: ;~/o /
afure
Form "J"
-3-
eEOA ehecklist 4199
File No,: eup 01-026
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1. A brief explanation Is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately
supported by the Information sources a lead agency cites In the responses following each question. A
"No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the
impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e,g" the project falls outside a fault
rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors
as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based
on a project-specific screening analysis).
2. All answers must take account of the whole action Involved, including off-site as well as on-site,
cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational
impacts.
3, Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist
answers must indicate whether the impact Is potentially significant, less than significant with
mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial
evidence that an effect is Significant. If there. are one or more, "Potentially Significant Impact" entries
when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4. 'Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the
incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a
"Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly
explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section
XViii, "Earlier Analyses," must be cross-referenced).
5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEaA process, an
effect has been adequately analyZed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration. Section
15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the. above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed In an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and state whether such effects were eddressed by mitigation measures based on the eartier
analysis
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures, which were Incorporated 01' refined from the
earlier document and the extentto which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate 'intothil checklist, references.to information sources for
potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or
outside document should, where appropriate, Include a reference to .the page or pages where the
statement is substantiated.
7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources, uses or
individuals contacted should be cited In the discussion.
8. This Is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead
agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's
environmental effects in whatever format is selected.
9. The explanation of each issue should Identify:
a) The significant criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) The mitigation measure identified, If any, to reduce the'impact to less than significant.
Form"J"
..4,.
eEOA Checklist 4/99
e
e
e
e
e
e
File No.: eup 01-026
less Than
S1gnirlCant
PoIentIaIly With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporatlon Impact Impact
I. AESTHETICS - Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? [ ] [ I [] [Xl
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, Including, but not
limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway? [ ] [ ] [I [X]
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality
of the site and Its surroundings? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? [ ] [ ] [] [Xl
The proposed pre-school and daycare center will be in an existing commercial building. Excepting signs,
which will be subject to Architectural Design Review, no exterior building changes are proposed. This
project will not result In any of the above Impacts.
II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES - (In determining whether Impacts to agricultural resources are
significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the Califomla Agricultural Land
Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the Callfomla Department of Conservation
as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.) Would the project:
I
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of
Statewide Importance (Farmland) as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the Califomla Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use? [ I [ ] [] [Xl
b) Confiict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract? [ ] [ I [] [X]
c) Involve other changes In the existing environment, which.
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland to non-agricultural use? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
The proposed pre-school and daycare center will be In an eXisting commercial building in a commercial
area that Is zoned for and developed with commercial uses. There are no agricultural lands, zones or
uses In the area. This project will not result In any impacts to agricultural resources.
III. AIR QUALITY - (Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or pollution control district. may be relied upon to make the fOllowing determinations.)
Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with or obstruct Implementation of the applicable Air
Quality Plan? [ ] [ ] [I [Xl
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to
an existing or projected air quality violation? [ ] [ ] [] [Xl
c) Result In a cumulatively considerable net Increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air
quality standard (including releasing emissions, which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? [ ] [ ] [] [Xl
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations? [ ] [ ] [] [Xl
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of
people? [ I [ ] [] [X]
The proposed pre-school and daycare center will be in an existing commercial building and would be
subject to local air quality regulations as administered by the South Coast Air Quality Management
District. This project will not have any adverse impacts on air quality.
Form "JOt
-S-
CEQA Checklist 4I!l9
FIle No,: cuP. 01-026
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through
habitat modifications, on any species Identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special status species In local or
regional plans. policies, or regulations, or by the Califomla
Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife
Service? ( ] ( ] (.J (X]
Ii) Have a substantial adverse effect on 'any riparian habitat or
other sensitive natural community Identified in local or
regional plans, policies, and regulations, or by the Califomia
Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife
Service? [ ] [ ] [I (XJ
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 ofthe Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh, vemal pool, coastal,
etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption,
or other means? [ I [ I [I [X)
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wildlife nursery. sites? [ I [ I [I [X)
e) Confiict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance? [ I [ I [I [Xl
1) Confilct with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan,
or other approved local, regional or state habitat
conservation plan? [ ] [] [] [X]
The proposed pre-school and daycare center will be In an existing commercial building In a fully
developed suburban commercial area. This project will not have any adverse impacts on biological
resources.
less Than
Significant
Potentially WIth less Than
Signlftcant Mitigation Slgnlflcanl No
Impact Incorporation Impact Impact
e
e
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance ofa
. historical resource as defined In Section 15064.5? [ I [ I [I [X)
bl Cause a substantial adverse change In the significance of
an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? [ I [ ] [J [X)
c) Directly or Indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feliture? [ J [ ] [] [X)
d) Disturb any human remains, Including those interred outside
offormal cemeteries? [ ] [J [] [X)
The proposed pre-school and daycare center will be In an existing commercial building (c. 1962) in a'fully
developed suburban commercial area. This project'will not result in any of the above .impacts.
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential. substantial adverse
effects, Including the risk. of loss, injury, or death involvln~:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault. as delineated on
the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning
Map Issued by the State Geologist for the area or based
e
Form-J-
-6-
CEQACheckllst 4199
e
-
e
Ale No.: eup 01-026
Less Than
Significant
Potentially WIth Less Than
Significant Mitlgat10n Significant No
Impact Incorporation Impact Impact
on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special'Publication 42). [ I [ I [I [Xl
Ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? [ I [ I [I [X]
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, Including liquefaction? [ I [ I [I [Xl
Iv) Landslides [ I [ I [I [XI
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? [ I [ I [I [XI
c) Be located ona geologic unit or soli that Is unstable, or that
would become unstable as a result of the project. and
potentially result In on- or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or coilapse? [ I [ I [I [X]
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined In Table 18-1-B of
the Unifonn BUilding Code (1994) creating substantial risks
to life or property? [ I [ I [] [Xl
e) Have soils Incapable of adequately supporting the use of
septic tanks or altemative wastewater disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater? [ I [ I [I [Xl
,
The proposed pre-school and daycare center will be in an existing commercial building In a fully
developed suburban commerclal area. This entire region Is subject to the effects of seismic activity, but
the subject location Is not within a Seismic Hazards Zone where mitigation as defined In Public Resources
Code Section 2693(c) would be required. The subject building has not been Identified as requiring
seismic retrofitting and the site has not been detennined to be especially Susceptible to any of the above
geologic problems. No unique geologic or physical features have been Identified at the site.
VII.
HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident
conditions Involving the release of hazardous materials Into
the environment?
c} Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-
quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which Is Included on a list of hazardous
materials sites complied pursuant to Govemment Code
Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would It create a
significant hazard to the public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan, or
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of
a public airport or PUblic. use airport, would the project result
In a safety hazard for people residing or working In the
project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would
the project result In a safety hazard for people residing or
working In the project araa?
g) Impair Implementation of. or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
FormltJ-
-7-
[ I
[ ]
[ I
[Xl
[ I
[ I
[. I
[Xl
[ ]
[ I
[ I
[X]
[ I
[ I
[ I
[Xl
[ I
[ I
[ I
[X]
[ I
[ I
I I
[XI
[ I
[ I
[ I
[X]
CeQA Checklist 04199
\
File No.: CUP 01-026
Less Than
Significant
PotentiallY WIth LJ'SS Than
Significant . MItlgatlon Significant No
Impact Incorporation Impact Impact
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury, or death involving wildland fires, Including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are Intennlxed with wildlands? [ ] [ ] [] [XI
The proposed pre-school and daycare cenier will be in an existing commercial building in a fully
developed suburban commercial area. This project does not involve hazardous substances, nor will it
create or expose people to health hazards. The site is not within two miles of an airport, and will not result
in any hazards for people worlting or living In the area. The subject site is not adjacent to or near any
wildlands, and will comply with emergency access and fire safety regulations.
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements? [] [ ] [] [XI
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or Interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit In aquifer volume or a lowering ofthe
local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of
pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would
not support existing land uses or planned uses for which
pennits have been granted)? . [ ] [ ] [] [X]
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the site or
area, including throughthealleration of the course of a
stream or river, In a manner that would result In substantial
erosion or siltation on- or off-site? [ ] [] [] [X]
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the site or
area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantlaflylncrease the rate or amount
of surface runoff in a. manner thatwouldresult in flooding on
or off-site? [ ] [ ] [] [XI
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned stonnwater drainage systems
or provide substantial additional sources of polluted. runoff? [ ] [ ] [I [Xl
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality [ ] [ ] [] [X]
g) Place housing within a 10o-year flood hazard area as
mapped on Ii federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? [] [ ] [] [XI
h) Place structures within a 10o-yearflood hazard area, which
would Impede or nidirectflood flows? . [ ] [ ] [] [X]
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death inVOlving flOoding, including flooding as a
result oflhe failureofa levee or dam? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflOw? [ ) [ ] [) [X)
The proposed pre-school and daycare center will be In an existing commercial building In' a fully
developed suburban commercial area, This project will not violate Regional Water auallty Control Board
water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, will not significantly alter absorption rates,
drainage pattems, surface runoff, surface water conditions, or ground w!lter conditions. The site is not
within a dam Inundation area, and will not expose people to any additional or increased hazard levels.
IX. LAND USE & PLANNING - Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
[ ]
[ ]
[X]
[ ]
Fonn 'J"
-3-
CEQA Checklist 4199 .
e
e
-
e
-
-
XII.
File No.: eup 01-026
Less Than
Slgnlllcant
Polentlally With Less Than
Significant MIt\ga1Ion Significant No
Impact IncorponItlon Impact Impact
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(Including, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan,
local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? [ ] [ ] [] [Xl
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or
natural community conservation plan? [ ] { ] {l [X]
The proposed pre-school and daycare center will be in an existing commercial building in a fully
developed suburban commercial area that is zoned for, and fully developed with suburban commercial
uses. This project Is consistent with the City's General Plan and with the commercial zoning of the site.
X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource
that would be of value to the region and the residents of the
state? [ ] { ] [] [X]
b) Result In the loss of availability of a locally important
minerai resource recovery site delineated on a local general
plan, specific plan or other land use plan? [ ] [ ] [] [Xl
The proposed pre-school and daycare center will be in an existing commercial building In a fully
developed suburban commercial area. No mineral resources are known to exist a! the subject property.
XI. NOISE - Would the project result in:
e) Exposure of persons to, or generation of noise levels in
excess of standards established in the local general plan or
noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to, or generation of excessive
groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels?
c) A substantial pennanent Increase in ambient noise levels In
the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodiC Increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan, or
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of
a public airport or public use airport, would the project
expose people residing or woridng in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would
the project expose people residing or WOrking in the project
area to excessive noise levels? { ] [ ] [] [Xl
The proposed pre-school and daycare center will be in an existing commercial building In a fully
developed suburban commercial area. The subject property is not within two miles of an airport, and will
not expose people to any excessive noise levels. Any construction related noise and vibration would be
falriy limited because this project involves mostly Interior tenant improvements. Exterior alterations would
be limited to the creation of an outdoor play area, re-striping of the parking and driveway area, and new
signs for the building. Any such noise or vibration Is not to exceed locally established limits, and there will
not be any long-tenn or pennanent noise-related Impacts.
[ ]
[ ]
[ ].
[X]
{ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[X]
{ ]
{ ]
[ ]
{X]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[X]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[Xl
POPULATION & HOUSING - Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an
directly (for example, by proposing new
area, either
homes and
Form "J"
-9-
CEQA Check11sl 4199
FIle No.: eup 01-026
Less Than
Slgnlflcant
l'Otentlally WI1I1 Less Than
Slgnltlcant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporallon Impact Impact
businesses) or Indirectly (for example, through extension of
roads or other Infrastructure)? [ I [ I [I [Xl
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere? [ I [I [I [Xl
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere? [ I [ ] [I [Xl
The proposed pre-school and daycare center will be in an existing commercial building in a fully
developed suburban commercial area. This project will not have any Impacts on the housing and/or
population of the area.
XIII. PUBUC SERVicES'" Would the project result in substantial adverse physical.impacts associated
with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities, need for new or physically
altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acpeptable service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for any of the public services;
a) Fire protection? [ I [I [I [X]
b) Police protection? [ I [ I [I [X]
c) Schools? [ I [ I [] [X]
d) Parks? [ I [ I [I [XI
e) Other public facilities? [ I [ I [I [Xl
The proposed pre-school and daycare center will be in an existing commercial building in a fully
developed suburban commercial area. This project is consistent with the City's General Plan and the
planned uses for the area, and should not have any Impacts on public services. Any necessary
extensions or additions of publiC facilities would be provided by this project.
XIV. RECREATION - Would the project:
a) IncreaSe the use of existing neighborhood and regional
parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial
phYlilcal deterloratlonof the facility would occur or be
accelerated? [ I [ I [I [X]
b) Does the project Include recreational facilities or require the
conlitriJction or expansion of recreational facilities, which
might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? [I [I [I [X]
The proposed pre-school and daycare center will be in an existing commercial building in a fully
developed suburban commerci.a! area. This' project will not have "any impacts on recreational facilities or
opportunities.
XV. TRANSPORTATION / TRAFFIC - Would the project;
a) Cause an Increase In traffic that Is substantial in relation to
the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system
(i.e., result In a substantial Increase In either the number of
vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or
congestion at Intersections)?
b) Exceed, either Individually or cumulatively, a level of
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways?
c) Result In a change in air traffic pattems, including either an
increase In traffic levels or a change' in location that results
in substantial safety risks?
[ I
[X]
[ I
[ I
[ I
[ I
[ I
[XI
[ I
[ I
[ I
[X]
Fonn -J"
ceaA Checklist 4199
-10.
e
e
-
e
-
-
FIle No.: eup 01-026
less Than
Slgnlf1cant
P_1y With Less Than
Slgnlf1cant Mlt1gatJon Slgnlf1cant No
Impact Incorporation Impact Impact
d) SubStantially Increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)? [ ] [ ] [] [XI
e) Result In inadequate emergency access? [ ] ( ] [] [XI
f) Result In inadequate parking capacity? . [ ] [X] [] []
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting
altemative transportation (e.g., bus tumouts, bicycle racks)? [] [ ] [] [XI
The proposed pre-school and daycare center will be in an existing commercial building in a fuliy
developed suburban commercial area. The parking availablllty at the subject site may be inadequate, and
the proposal may significantly increase traffic on Duarte Road and at the intersection with Baidwin
Avenue. A detailed review of this proposal is necessary to determine whether, or not this project is
consistent with the City's Circulation and Transportation plans for the area, and it It will have any of the
above impac:ts.
XVI. UTILITIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable
Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result In the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities. the
construction of which could cause significant environmentai
effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project
from existing entitlements and resources,. or are new or
expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider, which serves or may serve the project that It has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand
In addition to the providers eXistlng commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations
related to solid waste? ( ] [ ] [] (X]
The proposed pre-school and daycare center wiil be in an existing commercial building in a fuily
developed suburban commercial area. This project is consistent with the land uses for this area as
envisioned in the City's General Pian, and will provide any necessary extensions of public facilities. This
project wiil not have any adverse impacts on utilities and/or other public service systems.
( ]
( ]
( ]
(X]
,
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[X]
( ]
( ]
( ]
[X]
( ]
( ]
( ]
[XI
( ]
[ ]
[ ]
[X]
( ]
[ ]
( I
[XI
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of
the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below seif-sustalnlng levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range
of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate
Important examples of the major periods of Callfomla
history or prehistory?
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
(X]
Form "J"
-11-
CEaA Checklist 4199
\
File No.: eup 01-026
Less Than
Slgnlllcant
Polll!ltially WIth Less Than
Slgnlllcant MIlIgatIon Slgnlllcant No
Impact IncorpoI8t1on Impact Impact
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable'
means that the incremental ~ects of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection With the effects of
past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects.). [ I [XI [I [I
c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly? [ I [ I [I [Xl
The proposed pre-school and daycare center will be In an existing commercial building in a fully.
developed suburban commercial area. With the exception of not allowing other uses In the area that
would create a traffic problem, this project will not have any of the above effects or Impacts.
XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES
No earlier analyses, and no additional doc.uments were referenced pursuanfto the tiering, program EIR, or
other CEQA processes to analyze the project.
I
I
Fonn 'J"
-12-
CEQA Checklist 4'99
e
tit
-
)
File No. Cqp tl'1- 0'"
e
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
(626) 574-5400
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
Date Filed: 0- Z'l- 0 I
General Information
1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor:
C AlU.oc, q.. r;- LI Z-A(/JpTlrl i/IltOr<./~O
550 UTAt-f'l'l {!..v.
A(l..ci4v;"
CA. '1100 t
2. Address of project (Location):
iPS 1 r7/.JAA..TE: (2.17.
A~ C4v.'/1
CA.
91006
-3.
Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted coneerning this project:
C'AtU-os ... r::. L.l'2-A/!,JqH AIVPt4NJ (4-2<,,) '2.6'-(- '1'302
S 5 0 {' Arnt-f'A fl.o.
Aa.CAr?iA C' fl.
.
1/001
4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this
project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies:
t?NI-'i C-iT-( A"'~ .S'')'-t'/Te.
5. Zoning: G-;a.
6. General Plan Designation:
~MGU.l1I<--
Proiect DescriDtion
7.
--
Proposed use of site (project description):
.w..1~T
p~.,::>c..,.joc~ . ~eFC>u;.
M,o At"-rE../t.. I/Ay CA-lle'
}
8, Site Size: ;g, gOO'
Sq. Ft./
0.'11
Acre(s)
e
9. Square footage per buildin~:
1,000
10. Number of floors of construetion:
StN~~"",(,,~~
11. Amount of off-street parking provided:
~"lO ~ M",,-,,"l1~
12. Proposed scheduling of project:.
1- t1CI '!l Nt:} V,-'+4'
13. Associated projects:
NONF-.
14. Anticipated incremental development:
No.u€.
-
15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale priees or
rents, and type of household sizes. expected:
. N/A
16. If commercial, indiCate the type, i.e. neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square
footage of sales area, and loading facilities, hours of operation:
17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading faeilities:
lv/A
.
18, If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated
oecupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project:
19, If the project involves a variance, conditional use permit or zoning applieation, state this
and indicate clearly why the application is required:
N/A-
--
EnvlronlnfoForm
-2-
4101
e20. Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Diseuss below all items
checked yes (attach additional sheets as nec~ssary).
YES NO
o ~
21.
o ~
22.
o ~
o ~
o ~
o ~
23.
24,
25.
26.
O~ 27.
0 ~ 28.
It:J ~ 29.
0 I2Sl 30.
0 r8.I 31.
a ~ 32.
0 ~ 33.
Change in existing features of any hills, or substantial alteration of ground
contours.
Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public
lands or roads.
Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project.
Significant amounts of solid waste or litter,
Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity.
Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drairage
patterns.
Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity.
Is site on filled land or on any slopes of 10 percent or more? .
Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances,
flammable or explosives
Substantial change in demand for municipal services (pollee, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)
Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas,
etc.)
Relationship to a larger project or series of projects
Has a prior environmental impact report been prepared for a program, plan,
policy or ordinance consistent with this projeet?
o 0 34. If you answered YES to question no. 33, may this project cause significant
effects on the environment that were not examined in the prior EIR?
Environmental Settina
Describe (on a separate sheet) the project site as it exists before the project, including
information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, any cultural, historical or
scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the
structures. Attach photographs of the site. (Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be
accepted.)
35.
-
EnvironlnfoForm
-3-
4/01
'.
)
36. Describe (on a separate sheet) the surrounding properties, including information on e
plants, animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, Indicate the type of land uses
(residential, commercial, ete.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses.
shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-backs,
rear yards, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity, Snapshots or Polaroid photos will
beaecepted.
. Certification
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the
data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the
facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
Date
1/1.3/(/)/
C:::;La
(Signature)
1
,
,
For
EnvirontnfoForm
-4-
-
-
4101
657 W. Duarte Rd.
Rear of building & parking area
.
e
e
657 W. Duarte Rd.
Front of building
,
)
. e
657 W. Duarte Road
Rear of property & neighboring commercial buildi~g
[kSl~~' ~~.~~-~'~" .,,..,
r~'#'
\111
I
..~
...