HomeMy WebLinkAbout1651
oJ
e
RESOLUTION NO. 1651
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. CUP 01-023 FOR A 1,060 SQUARE FOOT
DELI-STYLE EATING ESTABLISHMENT AT 312 E. HUNTINGTON
DRIVE.
WHEREAS, on July 30, 2001, an application was filed by Mr. Dino Aloisio
for a TOGO's Eatery with seating for up to 18 people indoors and 8 people
outdoors in a 1,060 square foot retail space; Development Services Department
Case No. CUP 01-023, at 312 E. Huntington Drive, more particularly described
as follows:
Parcels 1 & 7 of Parcel Map No. 19433 in the City of Arcadia,
County of Los Angeles, State of California, as recorded in Parcel
Map Book 209, Pages 1 & 2 in the Office of the County Recorder of
Said County.
. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 11, 2001 at which
time all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present
evidence.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the factual data submitted by the Development
Services Department in the attached report dated September 11, 2001 is true
and correct.
SECTION 2. This Commission finds:
1. That the granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not be
detrimental to the public health or welfare, nor injurious to the property or
improvements in the zone or vicinity.
2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is properly one for
which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized.
.
e
.
e
3. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size l:Ind shape to
accommodate said use, and all yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking, loading,
landscaping. and other features required to adjust said use with the land and
uses in the neighborhood.
4. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and
pavement type to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use.
5. That the subject property is designated for commercial use in the
General Plan, that the proposed use is consistent with that designation, and that
the granting of the Conditional Use Permit will not. adversely affect the
comprehensive general plan.
,
6. That the evaluation of the environmental impacts as set forth in the
initial study are appropriate and that the project will have no significant effect
upon the environment within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality
Act of 1970, and, when considering the project as a whole, there was no
evidence before the City that the proposed project would have any potentially
adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends,
and therefore, a Negative Declaration was approved.
SECTION 3. That for the foregoing reasons this Commission grants
Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 01-023 for a 1,060 square foot delj-style eating
establishment in the retail space at 312 E. Huntington Drive, subject to the
following conditions: I
1. The use approved by CUP 01-023 is limited to a maximum 1,060
square foot deli-style eating establishment with on-site dining facili~ies that shall
be in compliance with the Building and Fire Codes and the City's Incidental
Outdoor Dining Regulations. The eating establishment shall be operated ahd
maintained in' a manner that is consistent with the proposal and pl~ns submitted
and approved for CUP 01-023.
-2-
1651
-
.
.
2. Additional trash and recycling facilities shall be provided, and the
enclosures shall be enlarged to accommodate the bins, as well as provide
C()nvenient access. Landscaping shall be added as necessary to screen the
enclosures. The existing and proposed trash facilities shall be shown on the
tenant improvement plans and shall be reviewed and approved by the Public
Works Services Department and Community Development Division'through the
plan check process.
3. This approval of CUP 01-023 includes a parking modification of 4
spaces in lieu of 22 spaces along with any additional parking space adjustments
that may be required by the Building Official to comply with the disabled a~ess
parking requirements. This Modification does not constitute an approval for a
general reduction of the parking requirements for the retail building or the
center, but rather only for the deli-style eating establishment approved by
CUP 01-023.
4. All conditions of approval shall be complied with prior to occupancy
of the eating establishment. Noncompliance with the plans, provisions and
conditions of approval for CUP 01-023 shall be grounds for immediate
suspension or revocation of any approvals, which shall result in removal of the
on-site dining facilities.
5. Approval of CUP 01-023 shall not take effect until the property
owner, applicant, and contractor have executed and filed the Acceptance Form
available from the Development Services Department to indicate awareness and
acceptance of these conditions of approval.
SECTION 4. The decision, findings, and conditions of approval
contained in this Resolution reflect the Planning Commission~s action of
September 11,2001, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Baderian, Huang, Murphy, Olson & Kalemkiarian
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
-3-
1651
e SECTION 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution and shall cause a copy to be forwarded to the City Council of the City
of Arcadia.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 1651 was adopted
at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on September 11, 2001,
by the following vote:
AYES:
Commissioners Baderian, Huang, Murphy, Olson,
Kalemkiarian
None
None
NOES:
ABSENT:
e
Chairm ,Planning Commission
City of rcadia
A751)
~~~
Secretary,~P anning Commission
City of Arcadia
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~9,~
Stephen P. Deitsch, City Attorney
City of Arcadia
e
-4-
1651
STAFF REPORT
D~OPMENTSER~CESDEPARTMENT
September 11, 2001
TO: Arcadia City Planning Commission
FROM: Donna L. Butler, Community Deveiopment Administrator
By: James M. Kasama, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Application No. CUP 01-023 for a TOGO's
Eatery at 312 E. Huntington Drive
SUMMARY
.
This Conditional Use Permit application was submitted by Mr. Dino Aloisio to
operate a 1,060 square foot TOGO's Eatery with seating for up to 18 people indoors
and 8 people outdoors at 312 E. Huntington Drive. The Development Services
Department is recommending approval of this application, subject to the conditions
listed in this report.
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Mr. Dino Aloisio of TOGO's Eatery
LOCATION: 312 !:. Huntington Drive
REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit for a 1,060 sq. ft. eatil'1g establishment
with seating for up to 18 people indoors and 8 people outdoors.
I
SITE AREA: 9.11 acres
FRONTAGES: Approximately 874 feet along E. Huntington Drive
Approximately 426.5 feet along S. Fifth Avenue
e
EXISTING LAND USE & ZONING:
The site (Arcadia Gateway Centre) is developed with 3 office
buildings, 2 freestanding restaurants, a multi-tenant retail building,
a 237 space, 3-level parking structure, and 585 surface parking
spaces. The property is zoned CPD-1 (Commercial Planned
Development) and is located within the Central Re'development
Project Area.
e
.
.
SURROUNDING LAND USES & ZONING:
North: Hotels & restaurants - zoned CPD-1
South & West: Railroad right-of-way - unzoned
East: 3-story office bldg. - zoned CPD-1; & across Fifth
Ave. are a self-storage facility and an office
building in the City of Monrovia.
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: CommerCial
BACKGROUND
The Arcadia Gateway Centre was built in the late 1980s and includes 3 office
buildings, 2 freestanding restaurants, a one-story multi-tenant retail building, a 237
space, 3-level parking structure, and 585 surface parking spaces. A parking
modification of approximately 10% was granted based on the "shared-use" of the
parking by the various tenants of the center.
The one-story retail building is situated in the westerly end of the center. There are
presently four food service uses in the building for which Conditional Use Permits
and parking modifications were approved and there is a bank that required a parking
modification. The other six tenants are allowed by right in the retail building.
There are 106 parking spaces located in the area in front of the retail building. The
spaces in this area are heavily utilized. The current tenants and parking status of
the retail building are as follows:
Tenant
Bank
EashNoodlnsurance
Maly's Beauty Supply (office)
Leslie's Pool Supplies
Bear Essentials Crafts & Gifts
Nirvana Indian Restaurant
Proposed TOGO's Eatery
3-Day Blinds
Sesame Grill Restaurant
Salon of Paris
Salsa Fresh Grill
Starbucks Coffeehouse
Totals
Sa.Ft.
5,427
2,140
1 ,400
3,750
4,888
1,019
1,060
1,031
2,431
1,246
1,293
1.246
26,931
Parking
Required
bv Code
33
9
6
19
25
11
22
6
25
7
26
25
214
Deficiency
from Code
12
1
o
4
6
7
18
2
15
2
21
20
108
Proportionate Share
of Available Spaces
Based on Sa. Ft.
21 (20.15%)
8 (7.95%)
6 (5.20%)
15 (13.92%)
19 (18.15%)
4 (3.78%)
4 (3.94%)
4 (3.83%)
10 (9.02%)
5 (4.63%)
5 (4.80%)
5 14.63%)
106 (100%)
CUP 01-023
September 11, 2001
Page 2
e PROPOSAL & ANALYSIS
The applicant is proposing a 1,060 square foot TOGO's Eatery with seating for 18
people indoors and 8 people outdoors. The hours of operation will be 10:30 a.m. to
9:00 p.m. Monday thru Friday; and 11 :00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Saturday & Sunday. The
proposed on-site dining facilities qualifies this use as an eating establishment, which
requires a Conditional Use Permit and parking modification.
Parkina
e
A delicatessen with take-out sales only is considered a retail use and would be
allowed by right. However, with the addition of on-site dining the use becomes an
eating establishment, which hes a parking requirement of 20 spaces per 1,000
square feet. The result is a requirement of 22 parking spaces for a1 ,060 square
foot deli-style eating establishment, rather than the 6 spaces required for a retail
use. Several parking modifications, however, have already been granted for the
uses in this retail building, as well as for the entire center, and there are only 4
parking spaces allotted for the subject retail space. Therefore, a parking
modification of 4 spaces in lieu of 22 spaces is necessary for this application.
The applicant provided a parking survey, which was conducted from July 16111
through August 7th. The survey counted the available parking spaces during the
lunch hour. The numbers of available spaceswere as follows:
Number of Available Parking Spaces at Lunchtime
Week Mondav Tuesdav Wednesdav Thursdav Fridav
July 16th 31 21 36 44 34
July 23rd 26 28 36 29
July 30th 40 44 28 33 41
Aua. 6th 37 39
Averages 36 32.5 30.66 37.66 34.66
The parking survey indicates that there are sufficient spaces available for the
proposed eating establishment. However, it must be taken into account that the
5,427 square foot bank (formerly occupied by Coldwell Banker Real Estate) at the
east end of this retail building is not yet open for business.
.
Based on his food service experience, the applicant states that a parking availability
of 8 spaces is adequate for his proposed business. And, at the hearing for the
bank's parking modification (MC 01-017) the Modification Committee was informed
that there would be up to 16 employees and that they would be directed to use the
I
, CUP 01-023
September 11, 2001
I Page 3
e
.
.
parking area to the east side and rear of the building or the parking structure. If the
bank employees park in accordance with this statement, there should be adequate
parking for the applicant's business and for the bank.
The City's Traffic Engineer visited the site on August 16th and counted 32 available
spaces at 2:00 p.m. Additional observations by planning staff (I.e., 28 available
spaces at 12:45 p.m. on Tuesday, August 28th & 19 available spaces at 12:25 p.m.
on Thursday, August 30th) verify the validity of the applicant's survey.
Staff's opinion is that a deli-style eating establishment will not generate a parking
demand that will result in a parking problem, even at lunch times. Staff also thinks
that a TOGO's Eatery would complement the other businesses in this center. The
Building and Fire Codes and the City's Incidental Outdoor Dining Regulations will
limit the actual number of tables and chairs and their arrangements. The proposed
seating does not appear excessive, and is comparable to the seating provided at the
other two eating establishments: 30 seats at Salsa Fresh Grill and 32 seats at
Starbucks.
Additionally, from an economic activity perspective, a parking problem may be
viewed as an indicator of a successful project. However, staff would not encourage
a project that would present parking problems because they typically have an
adverse impact upon surrounding properties and businesses who cannot control the
activities at other properties. In this case, however, because of the configuration of
the property, If there were a parking problem, it would be limited to the Arcadia
Gateway Centre, and would not result in impacts to other properties. Therefore, jf
there is a parking problem in this center, it should primarily be resolved by the
landlord and the tenants.
Trash Enclosures
There are five trash bins in two separate enclosures that are available for the
businesses in the retail building. However, these trash and recycling storage
facilities are not adequate for the current tenant mix. Public Works Services staff
has observed that the trash bins are usually overflowing, which tends to result in
litter being blown about the site and the attraction of vermin. Also, if the bins cannot
be properly closed during rainy weather, the resultant polluted runoff enters the
storm drainage system.
This proposal will result in five food service businesses in the retail b~i1ding. These
businesses tend to generate more refuse than other types of retail uses. The
existing enclosures are not large enough to accommodate the bins used at this
location. The Public Works Services Department has requested that the trash
facilities be increased, and that the enclosures be enlarged.
, CUP 01-023
September 11, 2001
, Page 4
e Code ReQuirements
All City requirements regarding disabled access and facilities, occupancy limits,
building safety, health code compliance, and site design shall be complied with to
the satisfaction of the Building Official and Community Development Administrator,
and are to be determined by having fully detailed tenant improvement plans
submitted for plan check review and approval. Tenant improvement plans that have
been approved by the Los Angeles County Health Department will be required for
issuance of building permits.
Any exterior improvements, including any neW signs and sign face changes shall be
subject to architectural design review and approval by the Community Development
Administrator.
Fire safety and occupancy limits shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Fire
Marshall,and shall include at a minimum the following:
.
· Any tenant improvements that obstruct existing fire sprinklers shall require either
relocation, or addition of sprinkler heads. A licensed C-16 contractor shall do
any fire sprinkler work. Any plans for fire sprinkler work must be submitted to the
Fire Prevention Bureau for review and approval prior to beginning any work on
the sprinkler system. Only quick-response fire sprinkler heads shall be installed
and a spare head box shall be provided with an adequate number of
representative sprinkler heads.
. A Knox-Box shall be provided for after-hours Fire Department access.
· Class 2A:10BC fire extinguishers shall be provided at locations to be determined
by the Fire Inspector.
· All exits shall be provided with illuminated exit lighting, and emergency lighting
shall be provided along the paths of egress.
· A seating plan approved by the Building Official and Fire Marshall shall be
posted in a conspicuous location.
An Industrial Waste Discharge Permit shall be obtained from the Public Works
Services Department prior to occupancy of the eating establishment, and the
aforementioned tenant improvement plans are to include detailed plumbing plans for
review and approval by the Public Works Services Department for determination of
whether, or not a grease traplinterceptor must be installed.
.
CUP 01-023
September 11, 2001
I Page 5
e CEQA
Pursuant to the prOVISions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the
Development Services Department has prepared an Initial Study for ,the proposed
project. Said Initial Study did not disclose any substantial or potentially substantial
adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the
project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise and objects of
historical or aesthetic significance. When considering the record as a whole, there
is no evidence that the proposed project will have any potential for adverse effect on
wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Therefore, a
Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project.
RECOMMENDATION
The Development Services Department recommends approval of Conditional Use
Permit Application No. CUP 01-023 subject to the following conditions:
.
1. The use approved by CUP 01-023 is limited to a maximum 1,06'0 square foot
deli-style eating establishment with on-site dining facilities that shall be in
compliance with the Building and Fire Codes and the City's Incidental Outdoor
Dining Regulations. The eating establishment shall be operated and maintained
in a manner that is consistent with the proposal and plans ~ubmitted and
approved for CUP 01-023.
2. Additional trash and recycling bins shall be provided, and the enClosures shall
be enlarged to accommodate the bins, as well as provide convenient access.
Landscaping shall be added as necessary to screen the enclbsures. The
existing and proposed trash facilities shall be shown on the tenant improvement
plans and shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Works Services
Department and Community Development Division through the plan check
process.
3. This approval of CUP 01-023 includes a parking modification of 4 spaces in lieu
of 22 spaces along with any additional parking space adjustments that may be
required by the Building Official to comply with the disabled a9cess parking
requirements. This Modification does not constitute an approval' for a general
reduction of the parking requirements for the retail building or the center, but
rather only for the deli-style eating establishment approved by CUP 01-023.
.
4. All conditions of approval shall be complied with prior to occupancy of the eating
establishment. Noncompliance with the plans, provisions and conditions of
approval for CUP 01-023 shall be grounds for immediate suspension or
CUP 01-023
September 11, 2001
Page 6
e
.
..
revocation of any approvals, which shall result in removal of the on-site dining
facilities.
5. Approval of CUP 01-023 shall not take effect until the property owrjer, applicant,
and contractor have executed and filed the Acceptance Form available from the
Development Services Department to indicate awareness and c!cceptance of
these conditions of approval. I
I .
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Approval
I
The Planning Commission should move to approve the Negative Declaration
and adopt Resolution No. 1651: A Resolution of the Planning Cdmmisslon of
the City of Arcadia, California, granting Conditional Use Permit Nol CUP 01-023
for a 1,060 square foot deli-style eating establishment at 312 E. Huntington Dr.
I
Denial
I
If the Planning Commission intends to deny this Conditional Use Pernjit application,
the Commission should move for denial and direct staff to prepare a resolution
incorporating the Commission's decision and specific findings. .
If any Planning Commissioner, or other interested party has any: questions or
comments regarding this matter prior to the September 11th public hearing, please
contact Donna Butler at (626) 574-5423.
;?
. " '?7' /'71'
, .. r/&.~
ol'1na L. Butler
Community Development Administrator
~
Attachments: Vicinity Map
Aerial Photo
Plans
Applicant's History I Resume
Negative Declaration & Initial Study
Resolution No. 1651
CUP 01-023
September 11, 2001
Page .7
e
e
HAMPTON INN
HOTEL
EMBASSY
SUITes
HOTEL
DERBY
RESTAURANT
0::
o
~
SOlJPl.ANTAnON ~
RESTAURANT IJ.J
~
<::>
OFFICE
ui
~
:I:
Ii:
u:
HUNTINGTON
BONITA
PARK
SERENDIPITY
SCHOOl.
BONITA 51.
u.i
~
At TERNATlVE
HIGH 'SCHOOL
TONY RoMA"S
ReSTAURANT
TOKYO WAKO
RESTAURANT
Ii!
~
L
DR.
BJ'S
REST.
OUVE
GARDEN
REST.
3-STORY
_OFFICE
BUII.DING
3~TORY
OFFICE
i
~
o
"
~
u
MEDICAL
BUILDING
VICINITY MAP
Application No: CUP 01-023
312 E. Huntington Drive
t NORTH
.
Scale: 1 inch = 200 feet
e
AER~Al PHOTO
Application No: CUP 01-023
312 E. Huntington Drive
t NORTH
No Scale
.
.
BUlWING lEGEND
BUILDING AREAS
. _ MEDICAl. OFFICE BUIUJING
B FOUR STOll'! OFFICE IJUUJJiNG _lIElJICl.LonIU.UUDUif1
nm<
C AM OFFICE BUlUJlNG muamMTOmcJl.M/t1.I)f1fG
D IfETML SHOPS """UX" ,06U.'.
""""FWD" ,o.U,SJI'.
E IlW'AURA!Ir S:r;, """'..- ,4PU.r.
",",,"FWD" 16.01S1.
F OU1!E rJA/l.OEN nmL
G J. .t1'ORr OFFICE BUlWING rtf".,,-I) AMOrncr.1RUW<<1
H J . UVEl. PARK/lIG STlWClVRE ""'FWD" 7.~~T.
"""",FWD" US"F.
J1rn:n'~ 7.N4.U.
"""
urAl1.SIffJI'~
_ UinAUUJiT
""'0""'''''
'nn'''1. .1/U.D1NG lUlU s.."
,,,.KQNJ ~WDtD
SU.FACE;'ItM~tNG'
'AHING'lIOl'JDID
ftlUAa"AUJIfO
~~ r.um<<J mUCJVU
'FJ' '"' D
'"' "
... .., ,.
.~~ ""...
. 0"'0 TOrAL.'~l1<<. I'.OYlDU
/
I
A
~
~
.
me
RENTABLE
qs'U,'-
.....u.
41.a>>SJI'.
6I.ZD"':'I'~
u"ms".
~mu.
7,>>71.'.
u>> .u:
11..161 $..F. ""'
l6.V1fJSF.llfto,
7.Jj7.tF.tI~
P.lJl1SJ./IOf7I,I
1/l2,7"$.I,
,11.n'S.',
JMSTAW
"UD'" -
"'''''''
"'.,..,.
5..1:.38e.4- 6r-Ce
,/
~
(NOT A ".un
HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA GATEWAY CENTRE
ARCADIA GATEWAY ASSOCIATES
N-l-
n" s(;~/e
[tJ
..-./1"__
-----
___'f
e Aroadla Gateway Center'
COmer: of. HrmJ ington. Dr..&,Fiflh St.
Ai'CaGia, 'CA
J
,,].~.
..
~
parbi~
[;ot
. ~.
.-..'!:
....
spn~-l' Shops B
I '
, '
a/
"
:/"
".
, B~1,
......
"6;427#,
" ,
5a"1<
.. ..
!"
'B-2
Eastwood
. "2,1'lIU 'd.
B~3 ..
Maly,'s,Beauty
tAOO d.
7a
~'13-4
Leslie's Pool
. 3:7~D'aJ.,
l, ,7- Eledrlcal
'10.
. ,..
..,1;f "..0._5
v....... c
,>"':' . Bea"r Essentials'
.Crafts & Gifts
. .4,858.sJ.
.
7
.
.. /.
) '"
~ .
'~
,/
.~~.
e
.l!}..
.~ '
. ... ..
.' . .
.
., '
'{) . ,,:
'0 .0"..' .
,.:0, .
.....,0"" '
~f'.:O.....
, ':',' '- >",'" '0:' ...:,Oi"'~-
. - -.
- ~" ." ;'
'. . . - ,.
,'. "~ ....,"':.. ",0:' ':,.'
. ,.. > ,......:.:'
."' ., .
.' ..
" .'
,0
,....
.
..' ,.:~'
." .' :',' ;:W:~':hQ':": ':.
'.:m'-"--: " ..,..,.
. " ..'P.d,~ '.~~:::.. r' M. :. .'
~:~' '00
'.
~ ';j'
,1'Ir'iCa I
Floor PlaY!
'H.O~.f.
e
.
.
History/Work Experience
Angelo Aloisio
In 1960 Angelo and his. family emigrated from a small rural town outside of Rome,
destination the land of opportUnity. At the age of21, Angelo Aloisio's first job was in the
restaurant business in Buffalo, New York, When he came to California he opened Paesano's
Pizza. This family restaurant was a true success. In 1980 he opened yet another restaurant named
Angelo's. This was a full service restaurant employing a staff of 75.
Realizing there was still much to learn about the food industry, Angelo accepred
employment with Alpha Beta Stores upon the sale of his restaurants. Alpha Beta was Angelo's
first experience wirh being a corporate employee. He worked as the department head in the
Service Deli Bakery, In his short years with Alpha Beta he learned their style of business and
management. He worked at a variety of different locations and his primary responsibility was
opening new locations and also restructuring problem stores, This transitional employment
enhanced his ability to effectively run a successful restaurant.
In [995 we opened our first Togo's in Whinier, California. Since opening, Angelo has
been effective in operating a successful franchise, while creating a management structure to
ensure quality customer service to grow this business. In 1998 the Pasadena Togols was opened
to further this dream, Angelo is acknowledged by Togo's Corporate as not only an excellent
franchisee approved for multiple store future development, but also a test store for new products,
services and internal studies. Angelo is charged with assembling and supervising management
and store staff teams in each of our locations. Daily commitment is one of the many secrets of
restaurant success.
Dino Aloisio
At age five Dino began his involvement in the family restaur.ant. At the age of 7 Dino
and Angelo began their first joint venture selling bread sticks. Angelo was instrumental in the
baking of the product and Dino solicited the local merchants at the lunch hour. Unbelievably,
what started as a way to teach Dino the fundamentals of business, resulted in a highly successful
and profitable bread stick business, operating for nearly ten years. By age 15 tlinp was proficient
in the restaurant business and was responsible for weekend operations,
Upon the sale of the restaurants Dino began his full time studies at Loyola Marymount
University where he studied Business Management and History. Simultaneously he worked at
California Federal Bank as atelier. Over the next four years Dino was promoted many times and
excelled at every position held at Cal Fed Bank. Upon receiving degrees from Loyola
Marymount and the California Federal Management Training Program he was offered a position
as a Financial Consultant. In September 1999 DiOl) was promoted to First Vice President of Cal
Fed Investments and A Registered National Association of Securities Dealers Principal.
While working at Ca1 Fed the dream of owning multiple restaurants became a priority.
After examining many opportunities in the food service business our decision was ,the Togo's
Franchise. In 1995 this dream became a reality when the Whitti~r Stote was opened. This store
prov~d to be a success and subsequently opened a second location in Pasadena.
Community Involvement
Operating a high service restaurant with excellent food quality is the secret to
maintaining good loyal customer relationships, Community involvement is equally important to
TOGO'S. We currently support our local youth organizations including, sponing clubs, Little
League, Boy Scouts of America, Girl Scouts of America, and a variety of local high school
student groups and clubs. Our participation has made our name in ,the communities we serve, A
reinvestment in the conununity and youth of the Cities which we operate have not only improved
our business but more imponantly enabled our community groups to enjoy the success and
support which they deserve, We believe Arcadia is fine community that is well rounded and a
place in which we want to be a part. I am confident our presence will not only enhance the
Arcadia Retail Center, but also create a better community.
e
.
~
.
File No.: CUP 01..Q23
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
(626) 574-5400
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
A. Title and Description of Project:
Conditional Use Pennit Application No. CUP 01-023
A Conditional Use Pennit and parking modification for a 1,060 square foot TOGO's eating
establishment with seating for 18 people indoors and 8 people outdoors.
B. Location of Project:
312 E. Huntington Drive-In the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles
C. Name of Applicant, Project Sponsor, or Person Undertaking the Project:
Mr. Dlno Aloisio of TOGO's Eatery
2133 San Pasqual Street
Pasadena,CA 91107
Contact: Mr. Dino Aloisio at (626) 824-9598
The City Planning Commission, having reviewed the Initial Study of this proposed project and having
reviewed the written comments receiyed prior to the public hearing of the City Planning Commission,
Including the recommendation of the City's staff, does hereby find and declare that the proposed project
will not have a significant effect on the environment. A brief statement of the reasons supporting the City
Planning Commission's findings is as follows:
The conditional approval of the proposed project will provide for confonnance with the City's
General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. There are no Potentially Significant Impacts.
The City Planning Commission, hereby finds that the Negative Declaration reflects its Independent
judgment. A copy of the Initial Study may be obtained at:
Community, Development Division
City of Arcadia
240 West Huntington Drive
Arcadia, CA 91007
(626) 574-5423
The location and custodian of the documents and any other material that constitute the record of
proceedings upon which the City based Its decision to adopt this Negative Declaration, are as follows:
Community Development Division
City of Arcadia
240 West Huntington Drive
Arcadia, CA 91007
(626) 574-5423
Date: August 7, 2001
~ft?~.
SI ature '
ames M. Kasama, Associate Planner
(Printed name & Utie) ,
. Date Posted: August 13, 2001
Ceuromia Environmental Quarrty Act
-Pagelof1-
Negative Declaration
-
.
.
FUeNa,: CUP 2001-023
CITY OF ARCADIA
240WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. Project Title:
Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 2001-023
2. Lead Agency Name & Address:
City of Arcadia
Development Services Dept./Community Development Div.lPlanning Services
240 W. Huntington Drive
Post Office Box 60021
Arcadia, CA 91066-6021
3. Lead Agency Contact Person & Phone Number:
James M. Kasama, Associate Planner- (626) 574-5445/fax (626) 447-9173
4. Project Location (address):
312 E. Huntington Drive
In the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles
5. Project Sponsor's Name, Address & Phone Number:
Mr. Dino Aloisio of TOGO's Eatery
2133 San pasqual Street
Pasadena; CA 91107
Contact: Mr, Dino Aloisio at (626) 824-9598
6. General Plan Designation:
Commercial
7. Zoning Classification:
CPD-1: Commercial Planned Development
Form I>J"
-1-
CECA Checklist 4199
e
.
.
File No.: CUP 2001-023
8. Description of Project: ,
(Describe the whole action Involved, Including but not limited t() later phases of the project, and any secondary,
support, or off;s~e features necessary for its implementation.)
A Conditional Use Permit and parking modification for a 1,060 squarefDot TOGO's
eating establishment with seating for 18 people indoors and 8 people outdoors at
312 E. Huntington Drive in the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles,
9. Surrounding land uses and setting:
(Briefly describe the project's surroundings.)
The subject property is in a retail building in a commercial center in a commercial
area on a major arterial near a major freeway.
10. Other public agencies whose approval is required:
(e.g., permits, flnancing approval, participation agreement)
The City Building Services, Engineering Division, Fire Marshall,' Public Works
I
Services, and Water Services will review the construction plans for the tenant
improvements for compliance with all applicable construction codes and will
oversee construction and installation of any necessary infrastructure or
improvements on-site and/or within the public right-of-way. The tenant
improvements for the eating establishment will also be reviewed by the Los Angeles
County Health Department for compliance with local health codes.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this
project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as
indicated by the checklist on the following pages:
[ ] Aesthetics
[ ] Agricultural Resources
[ ] Air Quality
[ ] Biological Resources
[ ] Cultural Resources
[ ] Geology / Soils
[ ] Hazards & Hazardous Materials
[ ] Hydrology I Water Quality
[ ] Land Use / Planning
[ ] Mineral Resources
[ ] Noise
[ ] Population / Housing
[ ] Public Services
[ ] Recreation
[ ] Transportation / Traffic
[ ] Utilities I Service Systems
[ ] Mandatory Findings of Significance
Form "J"
-2-
CEOA Checklist 4/99
e
.
.
File ~o,: CUP 2001-023
DETERMINATION:
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
[Xl I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[l I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions
in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[l I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,
[l I find that the proposed project MAY have a .potentially significant impact" or
.potentially significant unless mitigated impact" on the environment, but at least
one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures
based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the
effects that remain to be addressed.
[l I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, but because all potentially significant effects (a) have been
analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant
to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or
mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing
further is required.
By: James M. Kasama, Associate Planner
For: City of Arcadia
p-/?7~ . ~
Slgnat -
Date: Auqust 7. 2001
Form"!J"
-3-
CEQA Checklist 4/99
e
.
.
FOe No.: CUP 2001-023
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1. A brief explanation Is required for all answers except "No Impact' answers that are adequately
supported by the Information sources a lead agency cites in the responses following each question. A
"No Impact" answer Is adequately supported If the referenced information sources show that the
Impact simply does not apply to projects like the one Involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault
rupture zone). A "No Impact' answer should be explained where It Is based on projeCt-specific factors
as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based
on a project-specific screening analysis).
2. All answers must take account of the whole action Involved, Including off-site as well as on-site,
cumulative as well as project"levef, Indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational
Impacts.
3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical Impact may occur, then the checklist
answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with
mltlgatlon, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" Is appropriate If there Is substantial
evidence that an effect Is significant. If thera are one or more, "Potentially Significant Impact" entries
when the determination Is made, an EIR is required.
4. 'Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation IncOrporated" applies where the
Incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a
"Less Than Significant Impact. " The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly
explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section
XVIII, "Earlier Analyses,' must be cross-referenced).
5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an
effect has been adequately analyzed In an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration. Section
15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the 'following:
a) Earlier Analyses USed. Identify and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures that were incorporated or refined from the earlier
document and the eldentto which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist, references to infoffT)ation sources for
potential Impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or
outside document should, where appropriate, Include a reference to the page or pages where the
statement is substantiated.
7. Supporting InformatiOn Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources, uses or
Individuals contacted Should be cited in the discussion.
8. This Is only a suggested form, and lead agencies ara free to use different formats; however, lead
agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's
environmental effects In whatever format Is selected. '
9. The explanation of eaCh Issue shouldidentlfy:
a) The significant criteria or threshold, If aflY, used to evaluate each question; and
b) The mitlgatlon measure Identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant.
Form" J"
-4-
CEOA Checklist 4199
e
e
.
File No.: CUP 2001-023
Less Than
Significant
PotenUa11y With Less Than
Significant MlUgallon Significant No
Impecl Incorporation Impecl Impecl
I. AESTHETICS - Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? [ I [ I [I [X]
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not
limited to, trees, rock outcropplngs, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway? [ I [I [I [X]
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character ,or quality
of the site and its surroundings? [ I [ I [I [Xl
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? [ I [ I [I [Xl
The propoS8d deli-style eating establishment will be In an existing retail building in a cdmmercial center In
a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above Impacts.
II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES - (In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are
significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the Califomia Agricultural Land
Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the Califomia Department of Conservation
as an optional model to US8 in assessing Impacts on agriculture and farmland.) Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of
Statewide importance (Familand) as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the Califomia Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use? [ I [ I [I [Xl
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract? [ I [ I [I [XI
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment, which,
due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland to non-agricultural US8? [ I [ 1 [] [XI
The proposed dell-style eating establishment will be In an existing retail building In a commercial center In
a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above Impacts.
III, AIR QUALITY - (Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or pollution control district may be relied upon to make the follOWing deteflJlinations.)
Would the proposal: .
a) Conflict with or obstruct Implementation of the applicable Air
Quality Plan? [ I [ I [J [Xl
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to
an existing or projected air quality violation? [ I [ I [I [X]
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net IncreaS8 of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region Is non-
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air
quality standard (inclUding releasing emissions, which
exceed quanlilative thresholds for ozone precursors)? [ ] [ ! [I [Xl
d), Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations? [ I [ I [I [X]
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of
people? [ I [ I [I [Xl
The proposed dell-style eating establishment will be In an existing retail building in a cOmmercial center in
a fully developed commercial area. Cooking is not a part of this proposed eating establishment, and
becauS8 the proposed use Is subject to applicable air quality regulations as admlnls!ered by the South
Coast Air Quality Management District, ilwill not have any of the above impacts.
Form -J-
-So
CECA Checklist 4199
e
.
.
File No.: CUP 2001-023
Less Than
Slgnlflcant
Potentially With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporation Impaot Impaot
IV.BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse Impact, either directly or through
habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species In local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the Califomia Department of
Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife SeIVice? [ ] [ I [] [Xl
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or
other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, and regulations, or by the Callfomia Departinent
of Fish and Game or U. S, Fish and Wildlife SeIVice? [ I [ I [] [X]
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(including, but not limited to, marsh, vemal pool, coastal, etc.)
through direct removal, filling, hydrological Interruption, or
other means? [ I [ I [] [X]
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native'
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, or with
established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
Impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? [ I [ ] [I [X]
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preseIVatlon polley or
ordinance? [ I [ ] [I [X]
f) Connlct with the provisions of an adopted Habitat ConselVation
Plan, Natural ConselVation Community Plan, or other approved
local, regional or state habitat conseIVation plan? [ I [ I [] [X]
The proposed dell-Style eating establishment will be in an eXisting retail building in a commercial center in
a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above Impacts.
V, CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change In the significance of a
historical resource as defined In Section 15064.5? [ ] [ I [] [XI
b) Cause a substantial adverse change In the significance of
an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? [ ] [ i [] [XI
c) Directly or Indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or site or unique geologic feature? [ I [ I [] [XI
d) Disturb any human remains, including those Interred outside
of fonnal cemeteries? [ 1 [ I [I [XI
The proposed dell-style eating establishment will be in an existing retail building In a commercial center in
a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above impacts. .
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death InVOlving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on
the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Faull Zoning
Map Issued by the State Geologist for the area or based
on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42).
Ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
110 Seismic-related ground failure, Including liquefaction?
Iv) Landslides
[ I
[ I
[ J
[ I
[ I [ I [XI
[ I [ ] [Xl
,
[ ) [ I [X]
[ ) [ I [Xl
CEQA Checklist 4199
Form .. J"
-6-
e
e
e
b) Result in substantial soli erosion or the loss of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that Is unstable, or that
would become unstable as a result of the project. and
potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral
spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soli, as defined in Table 18-1-B of
the Unifonn Building Code (1994) creating substantial risks
to life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of
septic tanks or altemative wastewater disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater? . [ I [ j [I [XI
The proposed dell-style eating establishment will be in an existing retail building in a commercial center in
a fully developed commercial area. The subject location has not been detennined to be especially
susceptible to any of the above geologic problems and is not within a Seismic Hazard Area Identified by
the Seismic Hazard Mapping Act. The project will not necessitate extensive excavation, grading or fiiling.
No unique geologic features have been Identified at the site. The project Is connected to the local sewer
system. The project wiil not have any of the above impacts,
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident
conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into
the environment?
C) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-
quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous
materials sites compiled pursuant to Govemment Code
Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a
significant hazard to the public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan, or where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or publiC usa airport, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working In the project area?
I) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would
the project result In a safety hazard for people residing or
worklng in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of, or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
Injury, or death Involving wildland fires, Including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are Intennlxed with Wildlands? [ I [ I [I [X]
The proposed dell-style eating establishment will be in an eXisting retail building in a commercial center In
a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above impacts.
Form "J"
.7-
PotentiaUy
Significant
Impact
[ I
[ I
[ ]
[ I
[ I
[ I
[ I
[ I
[ I
[ I
File No.: CUP 2001-023
Less Than
Significant
WIth Less Than
MItigation Significant
Incorponitlon Impact
[ I [ I
[ I
[ I
[ I
[ I
,
[ 1
,
[ ]
[ I
[ ]
[ I
[ I
[ I
[ ]
[ I
[ ]
[ I
[ I
[ I
CEQA Checl<llst 4199
I
No
Impact
[XI
[XI
[X]
[Xl
[X]
[X]
[XI
[XI
[XI
[Xl
e VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the project:
a) Violate any water' quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
b) substantially deplete groundwater supplies or Interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit In aquifer volume or a lowering of the
local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of
pre-exlstlng nearby wells would drop to a level which would
not support existing land uses or planned uses for which
pennits have been granted)?
c} Substantially eiter the existing drainage pattem of the site or
area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, in a manner that would result In substantial
erosion or siltation on- or off-site?
d) Substantially aiter the exlstlng drainage pattem of the site or
area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially Increase the rate or amount
of surface runoff In a manner that would result in flooding on
or off.site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned stonnwater drainage systems
or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality
g) Place housing within a 1 DO-year flood hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
h) Place structures within a 1 DO-year flood hazard area, which
would Impede or redirect flood flows?
i} Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
injury or death Involving flooding, inclUding flooding as a
result ofthe failure of a levee or dam? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
The proposed deli-style eating establishment will be in an existing retail building in a commercial center In
a fully developed commercial area. The proposed use will not violate Regional Water Quality Control
Board water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, will not alter absorption rates, drainage
patterns, surface runoff, surface water conditions, or ground water conditions. The site ,is within the Santa
Anita Dam Inundation Area, but will not expose people to any additional or increased hazard levels. The
project will not have any of the above Impacts.
e
.
FOe No.: CUP 2001-023
less Than
Slgniflclint
Potentially With less Than
Slgnlfieant MllIgallon Significant
Impact Incorporation Impact
[ )
[ ]
[ )
No
Impact
[X]
[X]
[X]
[X]
[X]
[X]
[X]
[X)
IX. LAND USE & PLANNING - Would the project:
a} Physically divide an established community? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, polley, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan,
local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? [ ] [ ) [] [X]
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conselVation plan or
natural community conselVation plan?' [ ] [ ) [] [X]
The proposed dell-style eating establishment will be in an existing retail building in a commercial center in
a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above impacts.
Form OJ"
.a-
[ ]
[ )
[ )
[ ]
[ )
[ )
[ )
[ 1
[ )
[ )
[ )
[ )
[ J
[ )
[ )
[ )
[ )
[ )
[ )
[ )
[ )
I CECA Checklist 4199
,
I
e
e
e
FUe No.: CUP 2001-023
Less Than
Significant
Potentially WUh Less Than
Significant MIUgaUDn Slgnlflcant No
Impact Incorporation Impaot Impaot
X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Result In the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that
would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? [I [l [I [XI
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral
resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan,
specific plan or other land use plan? [ I [ I [I [X]
The proposed dell-style eating establishment will be in an existing retail building in a commercial center in
a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above impacts.
XI. NOISE - Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to, or generetion of noise levels in excess
of standards established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? [ I [ I [I [XI
b) Exposure of persons to, or generation of excessive groundbome
vibratloh or ground borne noise levels? [ I [ ] [I [Xl
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels In the
project vicinity above levels existing without the project? [ I [ ) [I [X]
d) A substantial temporary or periodic Increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project? [ I [ j [I [XI
e) For a project located within ail airport land use plan, or where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or pUblic use airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? [I [ I [I [X]
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
project expose people residing or working In the project area to
excessive noise levels? [ I [ I [I [Xl
The proposed dell.style eating establishment will be in an existing retail building in a commercial center in
a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above impacts.
XII. POPULATION &'HOUSING - Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly
(for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or
indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)? [ I [ I [I [XI
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, neceSSitating
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? [ ] [ I [I [Xl
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement bousing elsewhere?, [ I [) [I [X)
The proposed dell-style eating establishment will be in an existing retail building In a commercial center in
a fully daveloped commercial area and will not have any of the above Impacts.
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES - Would the project result In substantial adverse physical Impacts associated
with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities, need for 'new or physically
altered govemmental facilities, the cQnstruction of which would cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance
objectives for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection? [ ] [ I [I [XI
b) Police protection? [ I [ I [I [XI
c) Schools? [ I [] [] [Xl
Form "Jot
.g.
CECA Checklist 4Ill9
e
.
.
File No.: CUP 2001-023
less Than
Significant
Potentially With less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact lneorporation Impact Impact
d) Parks? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
e) Other public facilities? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
The proposed dell-style eating establishment will be in an e>\lsting retail building in a commercial center in
a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above Impacts.
XIV. RECREATION - Would the project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional
parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial
physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated? [ I [ ] [I [X]
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which
might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
The proposed dell-style eating establishment will be in an existing retail building in a commercial center in
a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above impacts.
XV. TRANSPORTATION I TRAFFIC - Would the project:
a) Cause an Increase in traffic that Is ,substantial in relation to
the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system
(i.e., result in a substantial increase in either the number of
vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or
congestion at intersections)? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
b) Exceed, either individuaily or cumulatively, a level of
service standard established by the county congestion
management agency for designated roads or highways? [ I [ ] [] [X]
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an
increase In traffic levels or a change In location that results
In substantial safety risks? [ ] [ I [) [X]
d) Substantially Increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or Incompatible
uses (e.g., farm equipment)? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? [ ] [ ] [I [X]
f) Result In Inadequate parking capacity? [ ] [ ] [ .] [X]
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting
alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? [] [ ] [] [X]
The proposed deli-style eating establishment will be in an existing retail building in a commercial center in
a fuily developed commercial area. A parking survey conducted by the applicant, and verified by City
staff, indicate that'there is adequate on-site parking. The proposed use will not have any of the above
Impacts.
XVI.
UTILITIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable
Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
[ ]
[X]
[ )
[ )
[X]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
Form ~J.
-1~
CEQA Checl<lisl 4199
e
.
.
File No.: CUP 2001-023
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With Less Than
MittgaUon Significant
IncorporaUon Impact
No
Impact
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects? [ I [ I [I [X]
d) Have sufficient water supplies av.allable to serve the project
from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or
expanded entitlements needed? [ I [I [I [X]
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider, which serves or may serve the project that It has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand
in addition to the providers existing commitments? [ I [ I [I [XI
I) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? [ I [I [I [Xl
g) Comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations
related to solid waste? [ I [] [] [XI
The proposed deli-style eating establishment will be in an existing retail building in a commercial canter in
, a fully developed commercial area and will not have any of the above impacts.
XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduca the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of
the major periods of Callfomia history or prehistory? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
b) Does the project have impacts that are Individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? ('Cumulatively considerable' means
that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when
viewed In connection with the effects of past projects, the effects
of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects.) [ I [ ] [] [XI
c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
Indirectly? [] [ I [] [Xl
The proposed deli-style eating establishment will be in an existing retail building in a commercial center In
a fully developed commercial area. Parking Is limited, and modifications have been granted to other
similar uses In the subject center. Based on the data from a parking survey provided by the applicant,
and verified by City staff, the amount of seating for the proposed eating establishment will not result in a
parking problem. The proposed use will not have any of the above impacts.
XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES
No eariier analyses, and no additional documents were referenced pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or
other CECA procasses to analyze the project.
Form"J"
.11-
CEQA Checklist <lI99
"
File No. CCI,o tJ/~02.J
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
(626) 574-5400
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
Date Filed: 7/21/'0 \
General Information '
1, Name and address of developer or project sponsor:
c...o^~hv
I '0
","-e;"" ell\.
2/3
2, Address of project (Location):
::)1:A Hu"'-\.'^">to.... "DC",
6N-'7s9B
'Sk '\5-(
~c-c.AdiA. CA
.'
Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project:
\)~"" ~\"\'S'IU "2. 13:' S.""'....... ~sG/....a,[ <;;{-
\><\<;;Ade.""" C ti\. 1\ \ 0 '::J-
(G-z(,) 67-cf- "l598
4.
List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this
project, including those required oy city, regional, state and federal agencies:
~~;~ ~r""",\.. &USIM<;!-l LISi.~
5. Zoning: c..~\:) - \
6. General Plan Designation: CO/'V\MP r~,,,,l
Proiect DescriDtion
7. Proposed use of site (project description):
e
~r<t\f "S""'...AIoJWk "S h..~
TO ViS E",,-kr~
e~'
9.
SiteSize:~O'3>Ot'?/J Sq,@
P""" .
Square footage per building:
10-\-",1 '&,.\d,^, "2.','1lQ SQ+!-'
Acre(s)
10. Number of floors of construction:
-0(\ <
11. Amount of off-street parking provided:
~?:'''5tA.ll~;^ E"j.;,(,p,o:'r..",J- f..P.~ r~oSjq.ll~GVov....d r"+";(le",lu
12, Proposed scheduling of project:
'3e. p k.1" be... I, ').OOl
13. Associated projects:
(\) OM...
14. Anticipated incremental development:
. (\)tl (\ {.
15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or
rents, and type of household sizes expected:
vvlp-
16, If commercial, indicate the type, Le. neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square
footage of sales area, and loading facilities, hours of operation:
Nt.'!ll... bo...\..""J , c.~ ~~\vY "S~\~~ ~\'lc... l.;oosQ.f'+- \\:JUIS of O""f~~." 11l~O~.TO'l,'1
17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities:
\fIl1t>.
18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated
occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project:
~/A
19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use permit or zoning application, state this
and indicate clearly why the application is required:
. ~\\ (e."'~u'Cl."b 'i", ~ Cl\.r o{. A.rc",d;"" \'l.<l";/e Cui? l'erM\\.<;;'
EnvlronlnfoFDnn
-2-
4/01
20. Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects?
e checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary).
YES NO.
oj 21,
I
I
o~
O~
o ~
~;
O~
o '~
.oil
oi
o~
~t
o~
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
32.
33.
Discuss below all items
Change in existing features of any hills, or substantial alteration of ground
contours.
Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public
lands or roads,
Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project.
Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity.
Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage
patterns.
Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity.
28. ' Is site on filled land or on any slopes of 10 percent or more?
29.
Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances,
flammable or explosives
Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)
Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas,
etc.)
Relationship to a larger project or series of projects
Has a prior environmental impact report been prepared for a program, plan,
policy or ordinance consistent with this project?
30.
31.
34. If you answered YES to question no. 33, may this project cause significant
effects on the environment that were not examined in the prior EIR?
Environmental SettinR
Describe (on a separate sheet) the project site as it exists before the project, including
information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, any cultural, historical or
scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the
structures. Attach photographs of the site. (Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be
accepted.)
35.
.
EnvlronlnfoFonn
-3-
4/01
36.
e
Describe (on a separate sheet) the surrounding properties, including information on
plants, animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land uses
(residential, commercial, etc,), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses,
shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-backs,
rear yards. etc.), Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will
be accepted.
Certification
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the
data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the
facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
Date (;,11010\
~
For \O~ry; fa.~"
.
.
EnvironlnfoForm
-4-
4/01
e
e
.
City of Arcadia
Environmentallnfonnation Form
Question 36
This development is a commercial center. There are 12 relliil spaces in the retail complex. The tenant mix
includes Eastwood Insurance, Maly's Beauty, Leslie Pool Supply, Bear Essentials Gifts, 3 Day Blinds,
Beauty Salon, Nirvana Restaurant, S~e Grill Restaurant, Salsa Fresh Restaurant, and Starbuck. Coffee.
This center also encompasses three large office buildings. The landlord controls all landscaping including
plants and the maintenance there of. The proposal at hand will not impact the surroundings or the local
environment We will not make any changes to the exterior of the building'all improvements will be inside
the space. At our deli we do not cook any food, so there is no exhaust.