The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1645 . e e RESOLUTION NO. 1645 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING A FIVE (5) YEAR EXTENSION OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. CUP 96-003 (RESOLUTION NO. 1536) TO USE MODULAR CLASSROOMS AT 1900 S. SANTA ANITA AVENUE. WHEREAS, on May 8, 2001, an application was filed by Steve Blankenship on behalf of the Arcadia Christian School for a five (5) year extension of Conditional Use Pennit No. CUP 96-003 (Resolution No. 1536) to use modular classrooms at 1900 S. Santa Anita Avenue, more particularly described as follows: Part of Lot 38 of the Arcadia Acreage Tract in the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles, State of Califomia, as per map recorded in Book 10, Page 18 of Maps, in the Office of the County Recorder of Said County. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on June 26, 2001 at which time all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence, NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1, That the factual data submitted by the Development Services Department in the attached report dated June 26, 2001 is true and correct. SECTION 2. This Commission finds: 1. That the granting of an extension of such Conditional Use Pennit will not be detrimental to the public health or welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or vicinity. 2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is properly one for which a Conditional Use Penn it is authorized. 3. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use, and all yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking, loading, landscaping, and other features required to adjust said use with the land and uses in the neighborhood. 4. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type to carry the kind of traffic generated by an extension of the proposed use. 5. That the granting of an extension of such Conditional Use Pennit will not adversely affect the comprehensive general plan. 6. That the evaluation of the environmental impacts as set forth in the Initial Study are appropriate and that the project will have no significant effect upon the environment within the meaning of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act of 1970, and when . e e considering the project as a whole, there was no evidence before the City that the proposed project would have any potentially adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which wildlife depends, and therefore, a Negative Declaration was approved. SECTION 3. That for the foregoing reasons this Commission grants a five (5) year extension of Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 96-003 (Resolution No. 1536) to use modular classrooms at 1900 S. Santa Anita Avenue. SECTION 4. The decision and findings contained in this Resolution reflect the Planning Commission's action of June 26, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Huang, Olson and Kalemkiarian NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Bruckner and Murphy SECTION 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause a copy to be forwarded to the City Council of the City of Arcadia. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution No. 1645 was adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held On June 26, 2001, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners Huang, Olson and Kalemkiarian NOES: None ABSENT: COlllmissioners Bruckner and Murphy Chairman, . ianning Commission City of Arcadia APPROVED AS TO FORM: ~P/~ Stephen P. Deitsch, City Attomey City of Arcadia -2- 1645 STAFF REPORT D~OPMENTSER~CESDEPARTMENT June 26, 2001 TO: Arcadia City Planning Commission FROM: Donna L. Butler, Community Development Administrator By: James M. Kasama, Associate Planner SUBJECT: A five (5) year extension of Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 96-003 SUMMARY This application is for a five (5) year extension of Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 96-003 for the use of modular classrooms at 1900 S. Santa Anita Avenue (Arcadia Christian School). The Development Services Department is recommending approval of a five (5) year extension. . GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Arcadia Christian School LOCATION: 1900 S. Santa Anita Avenue REQUEST: A five (5) year extension of CUP 96-003 to use modular classrooms SITE AREA 8.35 acres FRONTAGES: S31.50 feet along S, Santa Anita Avenue 462.50 feet along S. First Avenue EXISTING LAND USE & ZONING: The site is developed as an elementary school and is owned by the Arcadia Unified School District. The property is leased to the Arcadia Christian School. The zoning is R-1. e SURROUNDING LAND USES & ZONING: North: Single family residential & a church - zoned R-1 South: Single family residential- zoned R-1 East Single family residential across First Ave. - zoned R-1 West: Single family residential across Santa Anita Ave. - zoned R-1 e . . GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Single-family residential at a maximum density of 6 dwelling units per acre. BACKGROUND The subject property was developed as a public school by the Arcadia City School District in 1947. The property has been leased to the Arcadia Christian School for the past 20 years. In 1991, the City Council conditionally approved a Building Code Variance (Reso. 5598) for the Arcadia Christian School to import up to nine portable prefabricated buildings to be installed on fixed foundations. In 1995, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Pennit No. 95-009 (Reso. 1529) for the Arcadia Christian School to expand into an existing youth hut. This was the first CUP applied to the private school use at this property. In 1996, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit No. 96-003 (Reso. 1536) for the installation of three modular classrooms. So far, only two units have been installed at location 'E' on the site plan. The other unit was to go in the area occupied by two old prefabricated buildings owned by the Arcadia Unified School District at location 'H' on the site plan. The approval of CUP 96-003 was limited to a period of five years. The two modular classrooms that the Arcadia Christian School installed are in compliance with all City requirements regarding accessibility, fire protection, occupancy, safety, and site design. PROPOSAL AND ANALYSIS This application is for a five (5) year extension of the approval of CUP 96-003 for the two modular units that have been installed at location 'E' on the site plan. Each modular unit has 1,440 square feet and is divided into two classrooms for a combined total of up to 120 students. In the past, the use of temporary/modular classrooms has been approved in two other cases: The Anoakia School and the Rio Hondo Preparatory School. In both cases, there were extensions granted to provide additional time for the planning and development of pennanent structures. The Anoakia School eventually closed. The Rio Hondo Preparatory School completed construction of pennanent classrooms in January 1997, 20 years after their initial approval for the use of modular classrooms (C-76-20 /Reso. 956). CUP 96-003 - Extension June 26, 2001 Page 2 of 4 . Because the Arcadia Christian School leases the property frpm the Arcadia Unified School District, the development of permanent structures is difficult to accomplish and may not be practical due to provisions of the lease and the inability to finance permanent construction. Their lease has a term of five years, and is subject to termination with 180-days notice. Nevertheless, modular classrooms should not be allowed on a permanent basis, and a five (5) year time limit is appropriate. CEQA Pursuant to the provIsions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Development Services Department has prepared an Initial Study for the proposed project. Said Initial Study did not disclose any substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in any of the phYSical conditions within the area affected by the project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise and objects of historical or aesthetic significance that could not be made less than significant with mitigation incorporation. When considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have any potential for adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project. . RECOMMENDATION The Development Services Department recommends approval of a five (5) year extension of Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 96-003. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Approval The Planning Commission should move to approve the Negative Declaration and adopt Resolution No. 1645: A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia, California, granting a five (5) year extension of Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 96-003 (Resolution No. 1536) to use modular classrooms at 1900 S. Santa Anita Avenue. Denial . If the Planning Commission intends to deny this application for an extension of the Conditional Use Permit, the Commission should move for denial and direct staff to prepare a resolution incorporating the Commission's decision and specific findings. CUP 96-003 - Extension June 26, 2001 Page 3 of 4 . . . If any Planning Commissioner, or other interested party has any questions or comments regarding this matter prior to the June 26th public hearing, please contact Associate Planner, Jim Kasama at (626) 574-5445. Approved by: /),~ (~ ~-~ i. D~nnar~' --- Community Development Administrator Attachments: Vicinity Map Aerial Photo Site Plan Negative Declaration Initial Study Environmental Checklist Form (11 pp.) Environmental Information Form (4 pp.) Resolution No. 1645 (2 pp.) CUP 96-003 - Extension June 26, 2001 Page40f4 e . e .~~~ ~~ 7~ lii ~ s. ~ ~ r~ """- , ~ S'" 971~ij -" ",~ ".. ~ "" 'oo~ ..~ IN''?''~ .., ~~! t ~ '" I , h ~." ! II , ~ '"' 6'''!\b~ ~:'~ ~ "~~~.. . -"'C!l . Ii: ,~ ~1 J ~ l .,-~.:~!! 16 ';;': 3~~9~l'--~ --""'--ih"L-"-- ~'"a:& :;-':~"Q) -J Pl."" 0' LOT 33 It:}- ?~ '" . :;- -.;. . ~O' 28-"l.3f14~ ". .~ - e..... / 1,1 ~. ~ ARCADIA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL ~ /'900 S. SANTA ANITA AVE. . lL_______________, .- , , J ~ !!t t , , _n_ ..___ '>-__ . . T .. '~H l A ~ , M.&..4 -~t~~ j "24 ~ ~ ~1 9 ".. "" " ~ ~'13 ~o ~~ :; 1<11 3 ~.,.q 1i~~ ..~~ M a: "'00'_- .__ ..g.. Cl ..* '" l.' n. ~ G ~ j <(~ ' f.'i:.PAn b..l~ ()F ~ 2 lOT a: ~ l3 ~ :.----\...4l!-!!! - --- - on ......., 11& ~.J~ ~ ...li] II ~\..,. -~.- . u~ ;o~ >J 31 ~~ ,_.,-~ -fi'3lta ~. LEMON '....n uI ;c :! ~ :! :i I/) .- ,cle a<> de -- n "" ,T it A . . , . ~"'''' _ I'3.S loo.'&-:S ~~ I 2- ~ P.M. 21709 _ 'iI- .", "" ...... ~ .UJ..... LAS FLORES ~ . WI "" "R (-!T! J~ " ... f.t#) !~ I. I ~ n ~ ::J r= I~ "" foUl ,. -,," 10 IG. .L IS "' "1.8."'00".13 r\ VICINITY MAP CUP 96-003 Extension 1900 S. Santa Anita Avenue ~~c CHURCH 7 c . : (~ I. ~ 10 r-~5 .il 6 ; ~1I_ " -l T "r . ~~ 2 .:s~ ~q 11 '" 1# ~ '" ~, 7 ~ -~ AVE. to. T , .. '!!! (~r)"'-!'rc AVE. ~ rt:J.c~ I'l : i-l!." r ~. ill"'" Cl"<" ;1; ~;m 4J ~; - II i ~ ,...(: 4.1 ~~ . " ". N"""" , ~ 45 ~3' i., h Il~ Ilh:G. 13.,1(. a-~G.~ ~; 47 ~ ;, ~ sq . l" 4e !t- i ~. <t '0 ~q $[: .00- ;0 l~ ~.. ! Il ,. ~l .7 ~ . .,- 501 all> ~, "t:::'" "'1 ~~ 56 l" ~~ t 5>7 ~~ .....~... ~1 \, ~ '.504 1",':; ~3J;00 ~ jli .- ~~. "9 ":. -1.'1'& , WISTARIA .:.~t:v F (#J" Ct/~ ; . . , ., ~ 00 ~ M ... '4 I ... 10 .. '" . .., .Il: ii: - T . " , . . ..':tlt(~) " tJ"", "" ;//1 01 ~~~J , , (4 f'::) " I"': . " . I ~ t NORTH Scale: 1 inch = 200 feet . . . AERIAL PHOTO ARCADIA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL 1900 S. SANTA ANITA AVE. e ..: .~ '" . L.. @Itl ~ ~ ~ ~ ..: E" H ~ ~ '-"I . _ -.a "lOD Lp 0 f-- i u_ BUILDING KEY A - Administration B - Multi-purpose Cafeteria C - Classrooms D - Preschool E - Modular Clasarooms F - Youth Hut / Arts Classroom G - Utility Shed 'H - AUSD Prefab. Bldgs. - Storage I - Locker Rooms (Quonset Huts) . -i . @) <&) CD ? .~ rn ~ ~ ~ ~ .BGB E-< '" I>: H '" BGB I ~ l.(: .. scale 'T'NORTH / No . ARCADIA CHRISTIAN SITE PLAN SCHOOL e . . . FIle No.; CUP 9ll-003 EllI'n CITY OF ARCADIA 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE ARCADIA, CA 91007 (626) 574-5400 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT NEGATIVE DECLARATION A. Title and Description of Project: Five (5) year extension of Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 96-003: A five (5) year extension of Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 96-003 for the use of modular classrooms. B. Location of Project: 1900 S. Santa Anita Avenue -In the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles C. Name of Applicant, Project Sponsor, or Person Undertaking the Project: Arcadia Christian School 1900 S. Santa Anita Avenue Arcadia, CA 91006 Contact: Steve Blankenship (626) 574-6229 . The City Planning Commission, having reviewed the Initial Study of this proposed project and having reviewed the written comments received prior to the public hearing of the City Planning Commission, including the recommendation of the City's staff, does hereby find and declare that the proposed project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A brief statement of the reasons supporting the City Planning Commission's findings is as follows: . The conditional approval of the proposed project will provide for conformance with the City's General Plan and Zoning Ordinance. There are no Potentially Significant Impacts. The City Planning Commission, hereby finds that the Negative Declaration reflects its independent judgment. A copy of the Initial Study may be obtained at City of Arcadia - Community Development Division 240 West Huntington Drive Arcadia, CA 91007 (626) 574-5423 The location and custodian of the documents and any other material that constitute the record of proceedings upon which the City based its decision to adopt this Negative Declaration, are as follows: City of Arcadia - Community Development Division 240 West Huntington Drive Arcadia, CA 91007 (626) 574-5423 Date; Mav 16. 2001 e Date Posted; CaIIfomla EnvIronmental QualI\y Act NegatlveDecJaratIon e . . . . File No.: CUP 96-003 Exl'n CITY OF ARCADIA 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE ARCADIA. CA 91007 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Project Title: Five-year extension of Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 96..{)03 2. Lead Agency Name & Address: City of Arcadia Development Services Dept./Community Development Div.lPlanning Services 240 W. Huntington Drive Post Office Box 60021 Arcedia, CA 91066-6021 3. Lead Agency Contact Person & Phone Number: James M. Kasama, Associate Planner - (626) 574-5445/ fax (626) 447-9173 4. Project Location (address): 1900 S. Santa Anita Avenue In the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles 5. Project Sponsor's Name, Address & Phone Number: Arcadia Christian School 1900 S. Santa Anita Avenue Arcadia, CA 91006 Contact: Steve Blankenship (626) 574-8229 6. General Plan Designation: Single family residential at a maximum density of 6 dwelling units per acre 7. Zoning Classification: R-1/Single family residential Form t1J" -1- CEOA Checklist 4/99 . . . . . File No.: CUP 96-003 Exl'n 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole aellon involved, Including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off-slle features necessary for its implementetJon.) A five-year extension of Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 96-003 for the Arcadia Christian School to utilize modular classrooms. 9. Surrounding land uses and setting: (Brtefly describe the project's surroundings.) Single-family residences surround the subject property, except to the northeast where there is a church. 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required: (e.g., parmits, flnancing approval, participation agreement) The City Building Services, Engineering Division, Fire Marshall, Public Works Services, and Water Services will review any construction plans for compliance with all applicable construction and safety codes and will oversee construction and installation of any necessary infrastructure or improvements within any public rights- of-way. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORSPOTENTIALL Y AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages: [ ] Aesthetics [ ] Agricultural Resources [ ] Air Quality [ ] Biological Resources [ ] Cultural Resources [ ] Geology I Soils [ ] Hazards & Hazardous Materials [ ] Hydrology I Water Quality [ ] Land Use I Planning [ ] Mineral Resources [ ] Noise [ ] Population I Housing [ ] Public Services [ ] Recreation [ ] Transportation I Traffic. [ ] Utilities I Service Systems [ ] Mandatory Findings of Significance Form" J' -2- CECA Checklist 4/99 . . . . . FIle No.: CUP 96-003 Exl'n DElERMINA liON: (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: [X] I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [] I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. [] I find that the proposed project MAY have a .potentially significant impact. or .potentially significant unless mitigated impact" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. [] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, but because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. By; James M. Kasama, Associate Planner For: City of Arcadia Date: Mav 16.2001 Form"J" -3- CEQA Checklist 4/99 . . . . . File No.: CUP 96-003 Ext'n EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites In the responses following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supportad if the referenced information sources show that the Impact simply does not apply to projects like the one Involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it Is based on project-speclfic factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project-will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-speclfic screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action Involved, Including off.slte as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3. Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physicel Impact may occur, then the checklist answers must Indicate whether the Impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more, "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporetlon of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measuras, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (millgation measures from Section XVIII, "Earlier Analyses: must be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should Identify the following: a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mlligation measures based on the earlier analysis c) Mltigallon Measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures Incorporated: describe the mitlgallon measures that were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site.specific conditions for the project. 6. Lead agencles are encoureged to incorporate into the checklist, references to information sources for potential Impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources, uses or individuals contacted should be ciled in the discussion. 6. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9. The explanallon of each issue should identify: a) The significant criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure Idenllfied, if any, to reduce the Impact to less than significant. Form"J" -4- CEOA Checklist 4199 . . . . . File No.: CUP 96-003 Exrn less Than PotentlaI1y Slgnlllcanl Less Than Significant Impact WIth Slgnlllcanl No Impact MItlgatJon Impact Impact I. AESTHETICS - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? I ] I ] I] [X] b) Substantially damage scenic resources, Including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? [ J [ J [] [X) c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the Site and its surroundings? I J I J I] [X] d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views In' the area? [ ] [ ] [] [X] The modular units are located In an existing paved schoolyard. Any new units will replace existing units in the same schoolyard. This project will not result in any of the above Impacts. II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES - (In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the Califomla Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the Callfomla Department of Conservation as an optional model to usa In assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.) Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland. or Farmland of StateWide Importance (Farmland) as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring . Program of the Callfomla Resources Agency, to non- agricultural usa? [ ] [ ] [] [X] b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? [ ] [ ] [] [X] c) Involve other changes in the existing environment that. due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use? [ J [ ] I] [X] There are no agricultural. lands, zones or uses in the area. This project will not result In any Impacts to agricultural resources. III. AIR QUAUTY - (Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.) Wouid the proposal: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable AIr Quality Plan? [ ] [ ] [] [X] b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an exiStIng or projected air quality violation? [ ] [ ] [I [X] c) Result In a cumulatively considerable nat increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard Oncludlng releasing emissions, which exceetl quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? [ ] [ ] [] [X] d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? I ] [ ] [] [X] e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? [ ] [ ] [] [X] The modular units are located In an existing paved schoolyard. Any new units will replace existing units In the same schoolyard. This project wlll not result in any of the above Impacts. IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Have a substanllal adverse Impact, eitherdlreclly or through habitat modifications, on any species Identified as a candidate, sansltive, or special status species In local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the Callfomla Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service? [ ] [ ] [] [X] Form "J" oS- CECA Checldlst 4199 . . . . . FIle No.: CUP 96-003 Exrn Lesa Than PcIentIaIly S1gnlllcanl less Than SIgnIIk:ant Impact Wlth S1gnlllcanl No Impact MItIgallon Impael Impact b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other senSItive natural community Identified In local or regional plans. policies, and regulations. or by the Califomla Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service? ( ] ( ] (] (X] e) Have a substantial adverse effect on federaliy protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (Including. but not limited to, marsh, vemal pool, coastal. ate,) through direct removal. filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? ( ] ( ] (] (X] d) Interfere SUbstantlaliy with the movement of any native resident or migratory fISh or wildlife species; or with established native resident or migratory wildlife COrridOlS, or Impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? ( ] ( ] (] (X] e) Confilct with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? ( ] ( I (] (X] f) Conflict With the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation pian? ( ] ( ] (] (X] The modular units 8re located in an existing paved schoolyard. Any new units will replace existing units In the seme schoolyard. This project wili not result In any of the above Impacts. V. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change In the significance of a historical resource as defined In Section 15064.5? ( ] ( ] (] (X] b) Cause a substantial adverse change In the significance of an archaeOlogical resource pUlSuant to Section 15064.5? ( ] ( ] (] (X] e) Directly or Indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? ( ] ( ] (] (X] d) Disturtl any human remains, Including those interred outside oHonnal cemeteries? ( ] ( ] (] (X] The modular units 8re located in an existing paved schoolyard. Any new unltswili replace existing units In the same schoolyard. This project will not result In any of the above Impacts. VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, Including the risk of loss, injury, or death Involving: I) Rupture of a known earthquake fault. as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or basad on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of Mines end Geology Special Publication 42). ( ] ( ] (] (X] Ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? ( ] ( ] (] (Xl Ill) Seismic-related ground failure, Including liquefaction? ( ] ( ] (X] (] Iv) Landslides [ ] (] [] (X] b) Result In substantial'soil erosion or the loss oftopsoll? ( ] ( ] (] (X] c) Be located on a geologic unit or soli that Is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project. and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide. lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? [ ] ( ] [] (X] Form -r .e. CECA C_ 4Ill9 . . . . . File No.: CUP 96-003 Exl'n lesa Than PolentIaJIy Significant less Than Slgnlllcant Impact With SIgnIfican\ Impacl MItIgatlon Impacl No Impacl d) Be located on expansive soli, as defined In Table 18-1-B of the Unlfonn Building COde (1994) creaUng substanUal risks to life or property? [ I [ ) [] [Xl e) Have solis Incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or altemaUve wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? [ I [ I [] [Xl This entire region Is subject to the effects of seismic activity, however, the subject location Is not within a Seismic Hazards Zone as delineated by the seISmic Hazards Mapping Act. The subject building has not been identified as requiring seismic retrofitting and the site has not been datennlned to be especially susceptible to any of the above geologic problems. No unique geologic or physical features have been IdenUfied. Any new buildings will comply with current seismic construction standards. This project will not result In any of the above Impacls. VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a slgnlficant hazard to the publiC or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? [ ] [I [] [Xl b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset andaccldent conditions Involving the release of hazardous materials Into the environment? [ ] [ I [] [Xl c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? [ ] [ I [] [X] d) Be located on a site which Is Included on a list of hazardous materials sites complied pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the publiC or the environment? [ ] [ ] [] [Xl e) For a project located within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or publiC use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working In the project area? [ ] [ ] [] [Xl f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result In a safety hazard for people residing or working In the project area? [ ] [ I. [] [XI g) Impair Implementation of, or physlcally Interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? [ I [ I [] [Xl h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury. or death Involving wildland fires. Including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are Intennlxed with wildlands? [ I [ I [] [Xl The modular units are located in an existing paved schoolyard. Any new units will replace existing units in the same schoolyard. This project is in a fully developed suburilan residenUal area. This project does not Involve hazardo,us substances, nor will it create or expose people to health hazards. The site Is within two miles of a public airport (EI Monte Airport) but will not result in any hazards for people wOrking or living In the area. The sUbjectslte is not adjacent to or near any wildlands, and Is In compliance with emergency access and fire safety regulations. This project will not result In any of the above impacts. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUAUTY - Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? [ ] [ ] [I [X] Fonn"J" .7. CEQA ChecklIst 4199 . . . . . File No.: CUP 96-003 Exl'n Less Than PolenliaIIy Slgniflcanl Less Than SlgnIIIcant Impact WIth SlgniflC8nl No Impact MilIgatlon Impact Impact b) Substantially deplate groundwater supplies or Interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existlng nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? [ '] [ ] [] [X] c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, Including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on. or off-site? [ ] I ] I] [X] d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially Increase the rate or amount of surfaca runoff In a manner that would result In flooding on or off-site? [ I I ] [] [X] e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stonnwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? [ I I I [I [XI f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality [ I [ I [I [X] g) Placa housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insuranca Rate Map Of other flood hazard delineation map? [I [ I I I [X] h) Place structures within a 100-year flood hazard area, which would Impede or redirect flood flows? [ I [ I I I [X) I) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, Injury or death InvolVing flooding, Including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? [ I [ ] [I [X] D Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? [ I [ ] [I [X) The modular units are located In an existing paved schoolyard. Any new units will replace existing units in the seme schoolyard.. This project will not violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge requirements, will not significantly alter absorption rates, drainage patterns, surface runoff, surface' water conditions, or g'round water conditions. The site Is within the Santa Anita Dam Inundation Area, but will not expose people to any additional or Increased hazard levels. This project will not result In any of the above Impacts. IX. LAND USE & PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? [ I [ I [I [X) b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan, local coastal progrem, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? [ I [ I [I [X] c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? I I [ ] [I [Xl The modular units are located In an existing paved schoolyard. Any new units will replace existing units in the seme schoolyard. This project is in a fully developed suburban residential area, and Is consistent with the General Plan. This project will not result In any of the above Impacts. X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Result In the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? [] [] [] [X] Form ..r .a- CEQA ChecIcIIsl 4199 . . . . . FDa No.: CUP 96-003 Exl'n Less Than PolentlaDy S1gnlflcant Less Than Significant Impact WIth Significant No Impact MIIIgalIon Impact Impact b) Result In the loss of availability of a locally Important minerai resource recovery site delineated on a local generel plan, speclflc plan or other land use plan? [ ] [ ] [] [XI The modular units are located In an existing paved schoolyard. Any new unljS will replace existing units in the same schoolyard. No minerai resources are known to exist at the subjed property. This projed will not result in any of the above Impacts. XI. NOISE - Would the projed result In: a) Exposure of persons to, or genetatlon of noise levels In excess of standards established in the local generel plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencles? [] [ ] [] [X] b) Exposure of persons to, or generetion of excessive groundbome vlbtatlon or groundbome noise levels? [ ] [ ] [] [XI c) A substantial permanent Increase In ambient noise levels In the projed vlclnity above levels exisllng without the projed? [] [ ] [] [X] d) A substantial temporary or periodic Increase In ambient noise levels In the projed vlclnlty above levels existing without the projed? [ ] [ ] [] [X] e) For a project located within an airport land use plan. or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or publiC use airport, would the projed expose people residing or working In the projed area to excessive noise levels? [ ] [ ] [] [XI f) For a projed within the vlclnity of a p~vate airstrip, would the projed expose people residing or working in the projed area to excessive noise levels? [ ] [ ] [] [XI The modular units are located In an existing paved schoolyard. Any new units will replace existing units In the same schoolyard. The subjed property is within two miles of a public airport (EI Monte Airport) but will not expose people to any excessive noise levels. There may be construction related noise and vibration, but any such noise or vlbretlon Is not to exceed locally established limits. There will not be any long-term or permanent noise-related impads. XII. POPULATION & HOUSING - Would the projed: a) Induce substantial populallon growth In an area, either diredly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or Indiredly (for example, through extension of roads or other Infrestrudure)? [ ] [ ] [] [X] b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construdion of replacement housing elsewhere? [ ] [ I [] [XI c) Displace substantial numbers of people, n!lcessltatlng the construdion of replacement housing elsewhere? [ I [ I [] [X] The modular units are located In an existing paved schoolyard. Any new units will replace existing units in the same schoolyard and will not accommodate an Increased enrollment. This projed Is In a fully developed suburban residential area, and Is consistent with the Generel Plan. This projed will not result In any of the above impacts. XIII. PUBUC SERVICES - Would the projed result In substantial adverse physical Impacts assoclated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facllitles, need for new or physically altered govemmental facllitles, the construdlon of which would cause significant environmental Impacts, In order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protedlon? [ ] [ ] [] (X] b) Police protection? [ ] [ I [I [XI c) Schools? [ ] [ I [] [X] Form oJ" ~ CEQA ChecIdIsI 4199 e . . . . Flle No.: CUP 96-003 Exl'n Less Than PotenlIaIIy SlgnIftcanl Less 1'l'IaIl Slgnlftcanl Impacl Wllh S1gnlftcanl No Impacl MitIgalIon Impact Impact d)Parks? [] [] [] [X] e) Other public facllltles? [ ] [ ] [] [X] The modular units are located In an existing paved schoolyard. Any new units will replaca existing units in the same schoolyard. Any necessary extensions or additions of public facilities will be provided. This project Is consistent with the General Pllln, and will not have any impacts on pUblic services. XIV. RECREATION - Would the project: a) Increase the use of existlng neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilltles such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? [ J [ J [] [X] b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilltles that might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? [ J [ J [J [X] The modular units are located In an existing paved schoolyard. Any new units will replace existing units In the same schoolyard and will not displace any recreational facilities. This project will not have any impacts on recreational facilities or opportunities. XV. TRANSPORTATION I TRAFFIC - Would the project: a) Cause an Increase in traffic that is substantial In relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (I.e., result in a substantial increase In either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? [ J [] [J [X] b) Exceed, either Individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? I J [ ] [J [X] c) Result in a change in air traffic pattems, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? [ J [ ] [J [X] d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersectJons) or Incompatible uses (e.g., fann equipment)? [ J [ ] [J [X] e) Result In inadequate emergency access? [ J [ ] [J [X] f) Result In inadequate par1Ung capacity? [ ] [ J [] [X] g) Conmct with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting altemative transportation (e.g., bus tumouts, bicycle racks)? [J [ J [J [X] The modular units are located In an existing paved schoolyard. Any new units will replace existing units In the same schoolyard and will not accommodate an Increased enrollment. This project is consistent with the General Plan, and will not result In any of the above Impacts. XVI. UTILITIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? [ ] [ J [J [X] b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facllltles or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? [ J [ J [J [X] c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facUlties, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? [ J [ J [] [X] d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from exlstlng entitiements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? [ J [ J [J [X] Form"J" -10. CECA Checkllst 4199 e e . . . File No.: CUP 96-003 Exl'n Less Than SIgnifIcanl Lesa Than Impa<:l With Significant No MItIgalIon Impact Impact PolentIaDy Significant Impact e) Result In a detenninatlon by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may selVe the project thai It has adequate capacity to selVe the project's projected demand In addition to the providers existing commitments? [ I [ I [I [X] f) Be selVed by a landfill with sufficient pennllted capacity to eccommodate the project's solld waste disposal needs? [ I [ I [I [Xl g) Comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? [ I [ I [I [X] The modular units are located In an existing paved schoolyard. Any new units will replaca existing units in the same schoolyard and will not accommodate an increased enrollment. This project Is consistent with the General Plan. This project will not result In any of the above Impacts. XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrlctthe range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate Important examples of the major periodS of Callfomla history or prehistory? [ I [ I [I [X] b) Does the project have Impacts that are Individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) [ I [ I [I [Xl c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects. on human beings, either directly or indirectly? [ I [ I [J [X] The modular units are located In an existing paved schoolyard. Any new units will replace existing units in the same schoolyard and will not accommodate an Increased enrollment. This project will not result in any of the above impacts. . XVIII. EARUER ANALYSES No earlier analyses, and no additional documents were referenced pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CECA processes to analyze the project. Form "J" CECA Checklist 4199 .11. . . FileNo. ~UP 91; -003 6J-I", Date Filed: G/8/0/ CITY OF ARCADIA 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE ARCADIA, CA 9 ID07 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM General Information I. Applicant's Name: ARCADIA CHRISTIAN SCHOOL Ad~s: 1900 S. Santa Anita Ave., Arcadia, CA 91006 2. Property Address (Location): 1900 S. Santa Anita Ave., Arcadia, CA 91006 Assessor's Number: 5789-014-900 3. Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project: Steve Blankenship. Arcadia Christian School, 1900 So. Santa Anita Ave. . Arcadia. CA 91006 (626) 574-8229 4. List and describe any other related pennits and other public approvals required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies: Conditional Use Permit . 5. Zone Classification: R_' 6. General Plan Designation: SFR Proiect DescriDtion 7. Proposed use of site (project description): See At t ached 8. Site size: 8.35 Acre 9. Square footage per building: 1,440 10. Number offloors of construction: 1 ] 1. Amount of off-street parking provided: Not Applicable 12. Proposed scheduling of project: p..ro j ...~t C'romp' ATA R.APkine: C:TTP ,..pnpw~l 13. Anticipated incremental development: Not ApPlicable .14. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household sizes expected: Not Applicable. .15. . . If commercial, indicate the type, Le. neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities, hours of operation: Not Aoolicable 16. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities: Not Aoolicable 17. If jnstitutiona~ indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be .derived from the project: See Attached 18. I f the project involves a variance, conditional use permit or zoning application, slate this and indicate clearly why the application is required: CUP - Allowable use in Res. Area See Attached Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? _Sheets as necessary). 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. .27. Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional YES NO 19. Change in existing features of any hills, or substantial alteratin of ground contours. 0 UI 0 UI 0 51 0 till 0 till 0 a 0 ~ 0 a 0 lQI E.I.R. 04/12100 Page 2 Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public lands or roads Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage pattersn. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. Is site on filled land or on any slopes of 10 percent or more, Use or disposal of potentially hazardous' materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. as. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. .35. . . YES NO Substantial change in demand for muriicipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.) o JfiiI Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc. o l8!I Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. o JfiiI Storm water system discharges from areas for materials storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage delivery or loading docks, or other outdoor work areas? o l8!I A significantly environmentally hannful increase. in the flow rate or volumeofstonn water runoff? o UI A significantly environmentally harmful increase in erosion.ofthe project site or surrounding areas? o JfiiI Stonn water discharges that would significantly impair the beneficial uses of receiving waters or areas that provide water quality benefits (e.g. riparian corridors, wetlands, etc.)? o e Hann to the biological integrity of drainage systems and water bodies? o l2!I Environmental Settlnl! 36. Describe (on a separate sheet) the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 37. Describe (on a separate sheet) the slll'rounding properties, including.information on plants, animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land uses (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set- backs, rear yards, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certifY that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements; and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date . 5"4..or C_) ~ ~ ~ Signature E.I.R. 04112/00 Page 3 . . . Environmental Information Form Response to selected items: #7 Two 24' x 60' modular classroom buildings with associated decking, ramp, and landscaping. The buildings will contain (4) 24' x 30' classrooms. #17 The major function of this building addition is to support the educational needs of families desiring to place their children in Arcadia Christian School. #18 e #36 #37 . Two (2) 24' x 60' modular buildings containing four (4) classrooms. This addition will support.a total of between 100-120 students and will employ at least 4 additional instructors. This project will require a Conditional Use Permit due to the use of modular buildings. This is an existing school and is a leased site from the Arcadia Unified School District. It is not feasible for us to build pennanentstructures that we might have to forfeit. Arcadia Unified has no plans to build additional classrooms on this site. The requested life of this C.U.P. is presently 5 years. At this time the site meets all current zoning requirements for an educational facility. The project site is that of an elementary school with associated classrooms, off street parking, support buildings, playgrounds and ball fields. With the addition of modular classroom facilities to this campus, there will be no noticeable impact to the site other than an increased student body count. There is no impact upon any existing structures at this site with ilie addition of these buildings and thel"" will be no noticeable difference to plant or animal life. See attached photos. Surrounding properties are a mix of single family residences and a church, See attached photos. MEMORANDUM De\dopmmt Savica Department June 26, 2001 TO: Arcadia City Planning Commission FROM: Jim Kasama, Associate Planner SUBJECT: Agenda Item #4 - Additional information regarding the 5-year extension request of CUP 96-003. Attached is a petition from some of the nearby residents of the Arcadia Christian School. The locations of the signatories are shown on the attached vicinity map. e Attachments . a To: Arcadia Community Development Division [.:'[';'(:' " '., r:, .. ~ JUA/ 2 2 2D/11 e Date: 06/15/2001 '....". From: Nearby Residents of the Arcadian Christian School We, the nearby residents of the Arcadia 8hristian'School, oppose the request by Mr. Sleven Blankenship-for a five (5) year exlension or Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 96. 003 to allow the continued use of two (2) temporary/portable modular classroom buildings. We believe that continued use oflhe lwo(2) temporary/porlable modular classrooms has and will continue to cause intolerable disruPtions in the nearby neighborhood surrounding the Arcadia Christian School. Therefore, we strongly oppose Mr. Steven Blankenship's request and would like our voices to be heard and acknowledged by the.City of Arcadia Very Truly Yours, CD ~R~ /'6"3+ 5- ({,-t Ave _ e @) L~if7 r?~ s. 1st- AVe <V 1M JIt'tlm IezJ ;q 0 ~ 5. /51. Ave,. . e e e F .,i!~ ~ t t' f , $; . i3 ~~ ~ f'- ... . ~7~ i" ""~ ," .' ,\".. ~, . "" ". ", i,i'l,B - ~~ ...-- ~ ,,' ' ..r ~l ..2!...- I , 19 l- _n______'" __n_1I= J -r' " "~fi ' A 'I' ~~M.a.U .''Z.A3 IH~' '" II ~~1 9 ~'" ~ h~. :>~~! :; 3 r:~ '7'1 ~ '11 ~ ~ '",'" ~ a: C) ,,'.... .. '0>:, G . ~J j <(~ ~ <co;;vlln ll..1~ OF ~ .31~.. 9 LoT a:: ~ 3~ - ~ I' I:;.-'"itl-~~...!!rii-"'- j..........-.::. ~. ~ "1~1 "~a ~)....~t,. ~&. 1J."t!~f a ~.. ,.. LEMON , l....n w ~ ot I- :i ~ :i II) .l -, ,~ ""''''' ,T'. . ill I e "" eo ~ A G eo ~ ~ F~ , I , s , ~ , ,. _ 1'2.'ao loo,Q.1I "'~ I 2- ~ P.M. l!1 709 ~ ,ft, - {PI ~... 07.:11;l1 ,AZ.J'2,_ . If! f./rl fW lW LAS FLORES '. '. ",,'~ " ,:'J ;w UZ ~ ~ ~~ Et '20 I I " " '" " M,8.2 -It ~I~ r\ VICINITY MAP CUP 96-003 Extension 1900 S. Santa Anita Avenue ~~c_ l '~ 10 "5 .", ~" . ~I!. ." :J;: s 3~ .",.'(1. . CHURCH 7 ..,- C 6 f4JJ "" (~" " .. -, T .s~ . ~, 2 s: /; ~~ ~ 7 ~ ."" ..- AVE. ,.. ""- eo T , . : (~V (!,!.':t~ AVE. fHJ ~ ,., : ~.., "!;; W'" '"", ~'t)(;4 \ ;~ ~ -.~-~ ~.~ !~ dd ~ >. ,.. 1< ~"', -.:,- : . '" '1G(l~ 45~I .::: :!~ .::i " ... l~ Gl e~G~ ., , 6 I , I . fa li 46 ~~ .'G ,. ~:l <!~ . .., ~j " 51 ~i ~ ,- .- ~'2 .!i .. 55 :. ~ 'i I -. ~ , 'J ..$4 'Ii; S3 ~J ~:~. ..~ ll' k:.:'" 0 ~I 1.l~--='~ WISTARIA . ".' fJ'J.) . , .., "" 1 ~ ..,..a iT ,.a;~"- 'fI4I ,. C\ : '''.N 1- f ~ \':rn ", <(" ! a ,~ '" ~ ':-::f ~ .~ ~ . ~":o; !! "..'J;!' . 1..,: ~ ~'Il- :ii ~ i""-- Ill~ ~ ! n n;:"':3 ~ '0$' 0) i-p:;-::~~-;?-;;- ~.;; ~ ~ 3~ ~ -n- L~.~18-~~~~~ N' o 0AAC~~ CHRI~"~O~/' / 1900 S. sOOA AHrrA AVE. , _______~2.________, .~ I , ; ~ ., 1 I w ~~ <Do ~. ~ 1 se f. "'" !@ Fr@ ~...:,.J f/A1} p:; j;! I - ., .. I- 10 R CI) _ 7 D: ii: 't'.....i,~J .. r;;~) " C' t NORTH T " q,.,/ .. fI/i .. , '"' (Noll t41 ~ i Scale,: 1 inch = 200 feet