Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1643 e RESOLUTION NO. 1643 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 01-013 TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FLOOR SPACE, ANEW SWIMMING POOL, AND ADD THE SALE AND CONSUMPTION OF BEER AND WINE FOR A 30,090 SQ.FT. ATHLETIC CLUB FACILITY AT 56 E. DUARTE ROAD e WHEREAS, on April 23, 2001, a conditional us.e permit application was filed by Larry Lachner to provide 180 sq.ft. of additional floor space, a new swimming pool, and add the sale and consumption of beer and wine for a 30,090 sq.ft. athletic club facility (Development Services Department Case No. C.U.P. 01-013) at 56 E. Duarte Road, more particularly described as: Lots 13 &14 of Tract 13252 ex of st lots 9,10,11,12 in the City of Arcadia, COWlty of Los Angeles, State of California, as recorded in the Office of the COWlty Recorder of said COWlty. WHEREAS, A public hearing was held on JWle 26, 2001, at which time all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence. NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION I. That the factual data submitted by the Development Services Department in the attached report is true and correct. SECTION 2. This Commission finds: I. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the public health or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or vicinity because the initial study did not disclose any substantial adverse effects to the area affected by the proposed project. e e . 2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is a proper one for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized. 3. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate said use. All yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking, loading, landscaping and other features are adequate to adjust said use with the land and uses in the neighborhood. The proposed project complies with all related zoning requirements as set forth in the Arcadia Municipal Code. 4. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use. 5. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan because the land use and current zoning are consistent with the General Plan. 6. That the new exterior design elements for the subject building will be in compliance with the design criteria set forth in the City's Architectural Design Review Regulations. 7. That the use applied for will not have a substantial adverse impact on the environment, and that based upon the record as a whole there is no evidence that the proposed project'will have any potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. SECTION 3. That for the foregoing reasons this Commission grants a Conditional Use Permit, to provide additional floor space, a new swimming pool, and add the sale and consumption of beer and wine for a 30,090 sq.ft. athletic club facility at 56 E. Duarte Rd. subject to the following conditions: 1. That building code compliance and conditions of approval must be met to the complete satisfaction of the Inspection Services Officer. All ADA requirements shall be meet for disabled access; parking, restrooms, door hardware, and entrances. . 2 1643 . 2. All City code requirements regarding accessibility, fire protection, occupancy, and safety shall be complied with to the satisfaction of Building Services and the Fire Department which shall include, but are not limited to the following items: a. A Knox-box with keys shall be installed in conformance with Uniform Fire Code, per UFC 904. b. An NFP A-72 Fire Alarm System shall be installed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code and all other applicable provisions .of the Arcadia Municipal Code (3114.1). c. Provide occupant load signs at all locations within the occupancy. Provide seating plan and have in posted in the manager's office for inspection. d. Exit illumination shall comply with Sec. 1211 UFC. e. That all exit doors shall be equipped with panic hardware as defined in the building code. All interior doors shall open in the direction of travel. . 3. The athletic club shall be maintained and operated in a manner that is consistent with the application and plans submitted and approved for CUP 01-013. 4. That a modification be granted for 112 on-site parking spaces in lieu of 152 spaces required. This approval shall not constitute an approval for a general reduction in parking for the total site. That this parking modification shall only be for the use approved by CUP 01-013. 5. That CUP 01-013 shall not take effect until the owner and applicant have executed a form available at the Planning Office indicating awareness and acceptance of the conditions of approval. 6. All conditions of approval shall be complied with prior to the construction of the new stairwell, entrance, pool and sale of beer and wine. Noncompliance with the plans, provisions and conditions of CUP 01-013 shall be grounds for immediate suspension or revocation of any approvals for the atWetic club. . 3 1643 . e . 7. Noncompliance with the provisions and conditions of this conditional use permit shall constitute grounds for its immediate suspension or revocation. SECTION 4. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause a copy to be forwarded to the City Council of the City of Arcadia. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the forgoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 12th day of June 2001, by the following vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Huang, Olson, KaIemkiarian None Bruckner, Murphy ~~-~~~ Chairman, Plan 'ng Commisso n City of Arcadia APPROVED AS TO FORM: ~p~ Stephen P. Deitsch, City Attorney 4 1643 STAFF REPOlIT Development Services Department: June 26, 2001 TO: FROM: Arcadia City Planning Commission Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator By: Candyce Burnett, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 01-013 and ADR 01-016 SUMMARY This Conditional Use Permit application was submitted by Larry Lachner to provide additional floor space, a new swimming pool, and add the sale and consumption of beer and wine for a 30,090 sq. ft athletic club facility at 56 E. Duarte Avenue. Concurrent with this application the applicant is requesting design review approval for the exterior remodel of the eXisting building. . The Development Services Department is recommending approval of CUP 01-013 and adoption of Resolution 1643 granting the conditional use permit subject to the conditions in this staff report. . GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Larry Lachner (property owner) LOCATION: 56 E. Duarte Avenue REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit and Architectural Design Review to provide additional floor space, a new swimming pool, and add the sale and consumption of beer and wine for a 30,090 sq.ft athletic club facility. . SITE AREA: 72,478 sq.ft. (1.66 acres) FRONTAGES: 333 feet along Duarte Avenue and 136 feet along First Avenue . ./ . . . EXISTING LAND USE & ZONING: The site is developed with a 30,090 sq.ft. athletic club facility with 101 on-site parking spaces, which are dispersed around the building. Tenant improvements consist of remodeling the existing cafe area, adding a new entry, and adding a new pool area. The site is zoned C-2, General Commercial. SURROUNDING LAND USES & ZONING: North: Multi-family residential and Commercial; zoned R-3and C-2 South: Multi-family residential; zoned PR-1, R-2 and R-3 East: Multi-family residential and Commercial; zoned R-3 and C-2 West: Multi-family residential and Commerciai; zoned R-3 and C~2 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: The site is designated as Commercial BACKGROUND On January 25, 1977, the Planning Commission approved CUP 77-002 to operate a health fitness center at the sUbject location. At that tim~ a parking modification was granted for 83 parking spaces in lieu of 100 spaces required by code. In December 1979, the applicant built the subject facility and upgraded the on-site parking to provide 101 spaces. The hours of operation at that time were 7 a.m. to 11 p.m. seven days a week. PROPOSAL AND ANALYSIS The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to expand the 'existing facility for the purpose of building a new 180 sq.ft. staircase tower, changing the entry to the ground floor level, adding a new swimming pool area, and to, provide the sale and consumption of beer and wine on the premises. PARKING Currently, there are 101 on-site parking spaces; however, with the addition of the pool area the applicant has redesigned portions of the parking lot to provide 112 spaces, as shown on the submitted site plan. CUP 01-013 June 26. 2001 Page 2 . . . The applicant's proposal, if approved, will increase the total square footage of the club to approximately 30,270 sq.ft. which requires five parking spaces per 1000 sq.ft. of gross floor area per current parking standards. Based on this requirement, 152 spaces are required for the athletic club. Based on staffs experience with the existing athletic club facility, it is our opinion that a 40 space parking deficiency would not be detrimental to the site, neighboring businesses or to the adjacent residential units to the south. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW: Concurrent with the consideration of this modification, the Planning Commission may approve, conditionally approve or disapprove the applicant's design concept plans. The applicant's design concept plan proposes to remodel the existing exterior of the athletic club. Proposed changes include removing existing siding and replacing with stucco, adding the 180 square foot staircase tower with angled windows, a new canopy over the ground floor entrance, and removal of the existing sign, to be relocated and replaced with a single channel letter, non-illuminated, sign on the westerly portion of the north elevation (as shown on the submitted elevation). Staff recommends approval of the design elements as shown on the submitted elevations, except for the angled windows located on the staircase tower and the angled canopy over the entrance, because such angled elements are not visually harmonious with the surrounding development. Staff also recommends approval of the'submitted building and sign colors. ANALYSIS The proposed changes to the eXisting athletic club, i.e. the interior and exterior remodel, additional floor space, and to permit the consumption of beer and wine within the facility, requires a Conditional Use Permit. Generally, staff does not encourage uses, which are deficient in parking, however, based upon the applicant's proposal, it is staffs opinion that the proposed use and improvements would be appropriate for the site. Staff recommends that the applicant revise the submitted building elevation to delete the non-harmonious elements, as noted by staff. The applicant shall be required to comply with all code requirements as determined necessary by the Building Official, Fire Marshall, Public Works Services Director and Community Development Administrator. CUP 01-013 June 26, 2001 Page 3 CEQA . Pursuant to the provIsions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Development Services Department has prepared an initial study for the proposed project. Said initial study did not disclose any substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project' including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise and objects of historical or aesthetic significance. When considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have any potential for adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project. .. . RECOMMENDATION The Development Services Department recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit.No. CUP 01-013 subject to the following conditions: 1. The athletic club shall be maintained and operated in a manner that is consistent with the application and plans submitted and approved for CUP 01-013. 2. That a modification be granted for 112 on-site parking spaces in lieu of 152 spaces required. This approval shall not constitute an approval for a general reduction in parking for the total site. That this parking modification shall only be for the use approved by CUP 01-013. 3. All City code requirements regarding accessibility, fire protection. occupancy, and safety shall be complied with to the satisfaction of Building Services and the Fire Department. 4. Approval of CUP 01-013' shall not take effect until the property owner and applicant have executed and filed the Acceptance Form available from the Development Services Department to indicate acceptance of the conditions of approval. 5. The submitted building elevations shall be revised for the purpose of deleting the angled windows and entrance canopy subject the Development Services Manager review and approval. 6. All conditions of approval shall be comPlied with priorto the construction of the liew stairwell, entrance, pool and sale of beer and wine. ,Noncompliance with the plans, provisions and conditions of CUP 01-013 shall Qe grounds for immediate suspension or revocation of any approvals for the athletic club. CUP 01-013 June 26, 2001 Page 4 . . . FINDINGS AND MOTIONS Approval The Planning Commission should move to approve and file the Negative Declaration and adopt Resolution No. 1643: A Resolution ofthe Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia, Califomia, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 01-013 to operate an athletic club. Denial If the Planning Commission intends to deny this Conditional Use Permit application, the Commission should state the reasons for denial and direct staff to prepare the appropriate resolution incorporating the Commission's decision and specific findings. If any Planning Commissioner, or other interested party has any questions or comments regarding this matter prior to the June 26, 2001 public hearing, please contact Assistant Planner, Candyce Burnett at (626) 574-5444. ~4Z~ ~D - . Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator Attachments: Land Use and Zoning Map Negative Declaration & Initial Study Resolution 1643 CUP 01-013 June 26, 2001 Page 5 . ~ -- ~IO> . ",- ~- --- ,.. "l PR-3 12ll -.;: ~ 6 71> R-3 , C-2 ~: " ru ! . eo' !1 (41) (J4J ttfft G> !l/l.r.~ sl1.I.'l 50,a.'2 "'. ~. .# '\b_ '!. /00' Duarte Rd. ... I> ~~ f\; 0_ 54.-50 ~I 5.4.- 0 '25 (tf0 =~ SA. (iJ'lJ (S4J (2/ll (3Ql (3') '70.54 S "- , 5l~ ~ \,; .. ,~ 0> PR-l "l --l .2 . 0 ~ c...'. ( ~~ ISO.Oll '" "- '" 182.49 1'28.09 5l~ N 0\, NO' ~~ .... R-2 ..<.1 ,..;' ~C" .. o,;:.~ , (45') (S':S/ ...... ' -s- ' 0 IlJ2.49 113.011 <;;', O~ . '~ ~:'1: Christina St. <> ~ =~ .. -< I ...... 115 ,~ ~$~ 113 '" ~J G,O ~ --I 'j;~ ~,. '" (~ I ~'" . w - -'. ..... N ~ ,..: :>- '" .., ...w ,,-.:. '"'' Land Use and Zoning Map .... 56 E. Duarte Rd. tNORTH . CUP 01-013 Scale: 1 inch = 200 feet . . . ;l H ALLEY J I ~ PARKING DA.TA I' - 5T NoIDAflD PARKING <1& ... COMPACT PARKINc5l 0 ft HANDI-GAP PARKING 3 . TOTAL PARt:::.ING 101 lif I EXISTING> 8- Tl10 STORY lU SPORTS GLUS 8..... ~ ::> 8IJILDIN6 z " ~ ~ ! ~ '" ~ Z ~ () L ~ u:I q , ,..- '" - ~ \'! ;n - 1 11 Iii II :re 'fWAO a ouf>1< 1'-:--1 N l- I I~;J I . . . ALLEY PARKlN6 DATA STANDARD PARKING &1 ~ COMPACT PARKIN6. 2b ~ HANDI~AP PARKIN6 5 TOTAL'PARKIN6 112 it I I ==-- - EXISTING ........ - TWO STORY ~ SPORTS CLUB 8- ~ BUILDING " z ; ~ ~ "'" ~ - Z ~ Cl L :!; td q I ~ ~ iiI 1 a I OUA\<.IE \<.o/'-.o /00--1 N l- I B orA-2.2 . ~ -. ~- .~ ~ -. -----, ;"~~-:G Htf- 'J' IIl!!IeaeSlUI1!!ll!e!ll!!UU!lI ~ rTI I. f '...I Ui in-it! ~ @[---.--------'I:rl:ll:1: _ I -..- " 'II III [' ""'TlTiT---r' '~;;~ ' ____:J , L \..-,a..,lo::J- .....-, : --- ~ 1f:- l}- ___ I r--j 1..J L__ r-" l I ==- _-1 ~~:. . . " , ~ . --, , I , .-__J ...- - ----1 , , , ___J LEGEND i N DEMO. EX. HALL r---~---------------, ~------------------~ . 0EM0U110!'1 NOTES ..----- ----.-- --...---- --"- ---- _.."""-- ------- - ..----- ----,.-- ----- ----- - ..-..0",,--- ----.. ------ ------ -...----- ---.-- ----- -...-- - ..--.- -...--- ~----- -----._- ------..- ____IF___ ~ L_____ _._fII'____ ------ --~-- ...------ - r.______ ------ -...---'- ----...-- -------- ...---..--' -..--- -----... --- ..------- ---.-- ------- --....--- ------ -----..- ------ ----- .------ -..------ -.....ii____ ---~-- _______1> ------..- ---..---- - .1______ COU'..._____ --..--- -- ..------ ---~...._-- ---~-- ------ ---- L.___,..___ -----~... ----- ..----.. -..---- -- ...---...- -------- ~- ...-.-....-............. .~..- ...---.- ...--...-...- ..-....---- .- ..------- ------...- .----- .----. il I ~ j ~ ~ :!: q I ! li~ h ~ 1-........1 1- I 1::5 I 6YH iJ DODD I HB1~l.O(;.ATIOH .......... ......... ~ Q Q Q m=~2 E) -.""'" ~ RODNT """" OM """n... ......... lE),TO . E) ~ E) (H!51B'> ~ Q ~- :!; q , ,/ """"""'"' ~ - L ~ , i;~ j h $ w a NEH ROOF LINE I~""I I- I NEH TOHER NEW CANOPY N B AREA AFFECTED BY NEW HaRK Qf'A-2.4 . I Y . . L/ ~ It Y >TAR WET"""" . . . ji d ! J 't R~ CD EAST ELEVATION lj t ~ " 5 -...... ~ ~ cw......... ~ NORHT ELEVATION II @ J " i !~ , U ~ 2 I~-I l- I @ V'lEST ELEVATION r:,1 . ........ . - .... ffi4> CD EAST ELEVATION -----. @ NORTH ELEVATION @) -- -- -- I"H GOLDR nllreP 6LASS CTYP J NORTH ELEVATION I"4INDOY'l 5HEDULE 1'l-2 -....... =-- . - IiW.PlNI"IA. 1"1-3 --- . A.CIIIOIA .........0 ATMUTIC CLOIl ~ 1'l-4- SCALE. 1/4-;: "-0- I~ g 3 f Ii ,j I ~ " ~ ~ ~ ~ :!; q I II I~ I~ ~ ~iiI 1--...1 1- I I::~I SfAFF REPORT Deve.topment Services Department June 26, 2001 TO: FROM: Arcadia City Planning Commission Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator By: Candyce Burnett, Assistant Planner SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 01-013 and ADR 01-016 SUMMARY This Conditional Use Permit application was submitted by Larry Lachner to provide additional floor space, a new swimming pool, and add the sale and consumption of beer and wine for a 30,090 sq, ft athletic club facility at 56 E. Duarte Avenue. Concurrent with this application the applicant is requesting design review approval for the exterior remodel ofthe existing building. . The Development Services Department is recommending approval of CUP 01-013 and adoption of Resolution 1643 granting the conditional use permit subject to the conditions in this staff report. GENERAL INFORMATION APPLICANT: Larry Lachner (property owner) LOCATION: 56 E. Duarte Avenue REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit and Architectural Design Review to provide additional floor space, a new swimming pool, and add the sale and consumption of beer and wine for a 30,090 sq. ft athletic club facility. SITE AREA: 72,478 sq.ft. (1.66 acres) FRONTAGES: 333 feet along Duarte Avenue and 136 feet along First Avenue . . . . EXISTING LAND USE & ZONING: The site is developed with a 30,090 sq.ft. athletic club facility with 101 on-site parking spaces, which are dispersed around the building. Tenant improvements consist of remodeling the existing cafe area, adding a new entry, and adding a new pool area. The site is zoned C-2, General Commercial. SURROUNDING LAND USES & ZONING: North: Multi-family residential and Commercial; zoned R-3 and C-2 South: Multi-family residential; zoned PR-1, R-2 and R-3 East: Multi-family residential and Commercial; zoned R-3 and C-2 West: Multi-family residential and C.ommercial; zoned R-3 and C-2 GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: The site is designated as Commercial BACKGROUND On January 25, 1977, the Planning Commission approved CUP 77-002 to operate a health fitness center at the subject location. At that time a parking modification was granted for 83 parking spaces in lieu of 100 spaces required by code. In December 1979, the applicant built the subject facility and upgraded the on-site parking to provide 101 spaces. The hours of operation at that time were 7 a.m. to 11 p.m. seven days a week. PROPOSAL AND ANALYSIS The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to expand the existing facility for the purpose of building a new 180 sq.ft. staircase tower, changing the entry to the ground floor level, adding a new swimming pool area, and to provide the sale and consumption of beer and wine on the premises. PARKING Currently, there are 101 on-site 'parking spaces; however, with the addition of the pool area the applicant has redesigned portions of the parking lot to provide 112 spaces, as shown on the submitted site plan. CUP 01-013 June 26, 2001 Page 2 . . . The applicant's proposal, if approved, will increase the total square footage of the club to approximately 30,270 sq.ft. which requires five parking spaces per 1000 sq.ft. of gross floor area per current parking standards. Based on this requirement, 152 spaces are required for the athletic club. Based on staffs experience with the existing athletic club facility, it is our opinion that a 40 space parking deficiency would not be detrimental to the site, neighboring businesses or to the adjacent residential units to the south. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW: Concurrent with the consideration of this modification, the Planning Commission may approve, conditionally approve or disapprove the applicant's design concept plans. The applicant's design concept plan proposes to remodel the existing exterior of the athletic club. Proposed changes include removing existing siding arid replacing with stucco, adding the 180 square foot staircase tower with angled windows, a new canopy over the ground floor entrance, and removal of the existing sign, to be relocated and replaced with a single channel letter, non-illuminated, sign on the westerly portion of the north elevation (as shown on the submitted elevation). Staff recommends approval of the design elements as shown on the submitted elevations, except for the angled windows located on the staircase tower and the angled canopy over the entrance, because such angled elements are not visually harmonious with the surrounding development. Staff also recommends approval of the submitted building and sign colors. ANALYSIS The proposed changes to the existing athletic club, Le. the interior and exterior remodel, additional floor space, and to permit the consumption of beer and wine within the facility, requires a Conditional Use Permit. Generally, staff does not encourage uses, which are deficient in parking, however, based upon the applicant's proposal, it is staffs opinion that the proposed. use and improvements would be appropriate for the site. Staff recommends that the applicant revise the submitted building elevation to delete the non-harmonious elements, as noted by staff. The applicant shall be required to comply with all code requirements as determined necessary by the Building Official, Fire Marshall, Public Works Services Director and Community Development Administrator. CUP 01-013 June 26, 2001 Page 3 . . . CEQA Pursuant to the prOVISions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Development Services Department has prepared an initial study for the proposed project. Said initial study did not disclose any substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the project' including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise and objects of historical or aesthetic significance. When considering the record as a whole, there is no evidence that the proposed project will have any potential for adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project. RECOMMENDATION The Development Services Department recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 01-013 subject to the following conditions: 1. The athletic club shall be maintained and operated in a manner that is consistent with the application and plans submitted and approved for CUP 01-013. 2. That a modification be granted for 112 on-site parking spaces in lieu of 152 spaces required. This approval shall not constitute an approval for a general reduction in parking for the total site. That this parking modification shall only be for the use approved by CUP 01-013. 3. All City code requirements regarding accessibility, fire protection, occupancy, and safety shall be complied with to the satisfaction of Building Services and the Fire Department. 4. Approval of CUP 01-013 shall not take effect until the property owner and applicant have executed and filed the Acceptance Form available from the Development Services Department to indicate acceptance of the conditions of approval. 5. The submitted building elevations shall be revised for the purpose of deleting the angled windows and entrance canopy subject the Development Services Manager review and approval. 6. All conditions of approval shall be complied with prior to the construction of the new stairwell, entrance, pool and sale of beer and wine. Noncompliance with the plans, provisions and conditions of CUP 01-013 shall be grounds for immediate suspension or revocation of any approvals for the athletic club. CUP 01-013 June 26, 2001 Page 4 . . . FINDINGS AND MOTIONS Approval The Planning Commission should move to approve and file the Negative Declaration and adopt Resolution No. 1643: A Resolution of the Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia, Califomia, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 01-013 to operate an athletic club. Denial If the Planning Commission intends to deny this Conditional Use Permit application, the Commission should state the reasons for denial and direct staff to prepare the appropriate resolution incorporating the Commission's decision and specific findings. If any Planning Commissione~, or other interested party has any questions or comments regarding this matter prior to the June 26, 2001 public hearing, please contact Assistant Planner, Candyce Burnett at (626) 574-5444. APPP'Iea)y: --) --~ ?t,4~~ Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator Attachments: Land Use and Zoning Map Negative Declaration & Initial Study Resolution 1643 CUP 01-013 June 26, 2001 Page 5 . ~ ... <<>r.; 12ll .~-- '" PR-3 ~fi\ ~ 0 'tI .. R-3 1 ' ~- .... C-2 ~: -", " ~.,I:> IV 0 ~ ! 1'-'" &:J' "'''' ,,!ol "" ;;8 !;1 "'Ie> (41) (n/ ~ !;/).(,1 50.1i 50.1:.'2 ~. ,....- ~. IiIJ' ~ Duarte Rd. .... ~~ '" 0 ,.: - '1' 54.50 =~ ... 54.0 (,JI)) 54. :3Q) (32J~ C4i) (251 (. (3') 70,54 S ".. ~~ 0 -.l \; '" oJ PR-l .., -.I Q> ci . .~ 1>0 0 ~~ ..., . '. ( 4-''2 54,C'25 150.0'1 ... "" .. 182.-+9 1'26.09 ~~ ;! NO' g~ R-2 ...~ ,.; ~'" .. ~~ - (.D..aJ c.n ...... . (4.) '.$'~ 0 00,'%7 1/J2.49 I !!l.O'l ~ . ~~ ~ Christina St. " ~ ~.~ .. - 115 '!~ 113 ~) <;0 ~l li') --- -.:~ ij~~ .. (54) 0 .;.. ~ w - "1) -'. ~, .... ,..: ... , '5 r< ' ~ :>- "'~ '''4 ... <) ... ~w Land Use and Zoning Map '" 56 E. Duarte Rd. tNORTH . CUP 01-013 Scale: 1 inch = 200 feet . . . ALLEY PARKINS DATA .. - STANDARD PARKIN<;, qa ~ COMPAGT. PARKIN6 0 HANDI-GAP PARKINEi 3 it TOfAL PARJcJN6 101 I EXISTING TI'IO STORY ~ SPORTS CLUB 81- " lU BUILDIN6 " :l .. I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ () 0( L q -I lU I ~ - ~ I!! ;; j 1I1 -' !.i i3 O\lA\<.i'E \<.Of>o.O t 1""';-1 N 1w.11l. I B :-2.1 . . . ALLEY PARKINS PATA STANDARD PARKlN& '" GOMPAG T PARKINGo 2b HANDI-GAP PARKINe'- 5 il TOTAL PARKIN5 112 I I -- - EXISTING 2_ _~oW1. - Tlo"lO STORY SPORTS CLUB 8- ~ ~ BUILDING !l z ~ ~ - ~ ~ - z ~ () :>: I ~ --l UJ ~ ~ I'! " 1 ~ I ()\J/'J<_Tt: tl-Op...O I~"""I N I- I EJ :-22 . ~ "'" ~@ -. "' '" ," It~,;:.: , , , , .LJ(j ". ..---- 00\;--=.....= , , .', 4J . LEGEND t N DEr--fO. C:=:::::::=:::=:J EX. i'lALL -------, ~ -------, ~~~.,.",.~"'fl : HlI- .u;j' 1 : !!!Im.!I!I!!I!ISI!!I!I!!I..!!!D!Ull!!II if: fTl 'I ~_..,_J '..J: l~ t:::~ r---------------., I III II I I I - t If' .11 '1' I I __ III Ill:.: : I I I I III J L____.... C' =n;'-ri'.r~-J-.,...j~~;;;;~ I '---- 1 II L: I ~.I.-'-1---I '--, : --- .._I-1 I -.: _II'IP~ c.a"':iiDi.U.., 1 : I .JDr..f"-1 1---' , : }-- r-----..... , , , , ~_"j _~ 1..____ : ~ ==- ...---... . DEMOLITION NOTES ..------ ----.- ----..-.-- ------- -........-- ----- - ..--.......-- ----....-- ----- --..---- - L_,,"~_ ----- ---- .....------- -........---- ----..-. ------ _"'-'T_ - ...--..- -.----- ......----- ------ ______lI"_ ---"....-- ~ a_____ -".-"-"'- --....--- ___T__ --....-.....-. - "'------- ------ _..~--- ------- ...---..-- ..------ -..---- --...-... --- ......------- ------- -------... ------ ------ __"__ID_ --..--- ---- ~_.._--- ------- ------ ------ __.......___A -.e_.-___ ------- - ,1;_______ ------- --..--- ...------- ----......--... ___1&1.__ ------ ---- l.___"___ -------. ---..- .----.. --.-..--- -- ... ----....- ____~T_ r_ ..-.----- .---- ..---.- ...--..-..- . -...---- .- ....------ ..----..- :'~~-- if I i i~ U a l-vr~1 1- 1 [=:51 . I Y ~ ...... 6YM rrr=~~2 ~ . D ~"- ..... II ~ !lTAtRl NB't l..()C.KER.'t...O(;ATtOH G G ..,.",. ,ij..:- ,.-. .... .-..... ~a! NEW ROOF LINE @ ""1WOAAf AREA AFF~TED BY NE"'i HORK NEW C;ANOPY NEW TOWER . il I ~ u u I ~ ~ ~ r ~ . ~ J ~ ~ ~~ i h a I-_.rl I- I N EJ :-2.4 . . . CD EAST ELEVATION "._I'UL _."PiA @ NORHT ELEVATION ~ @ V'lEST ELEVATION ,J I ~ i , ~ ;1 I it ~..~ 2 1---1 1-1 ~;II . """"" CD EAST ELEVATION . -- - @ NORTH ELEVATION 1bt1Ql-6ll __ @ NORTH ELEVATION tE~ -- rl-I GOl.OR TIIfreD 6LA56 I'M'J J.^lINDOJ.^l SHEDULE 1'1-2 -_.......' . Iilll/;:AD'AAU..'IlOATIILITICCU,I1 1'1-3 1'1-4 SCALE, 1/4-= 1'-0- if I ~ ~ I~ I~ 2 fill I~"'~I 1- I Fl U . . . FileNo,: CUP 01-013 CITY OF ARCADIA 240 W. HUNTINGTON DRIVE ARCADIA, CA 91007 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT NEGATIVE DECLARATION A. Title and Description of Project: A Conditional Use Permit (CUP 01-013) to add additional floor space, add a new swimming pool and add the sale and consumption of beer and wine for a 3,200 sq. ft athletic club. B. Location of Project: 56 E. Duarte Avenue In the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles C. Name of Applicant, Sponsor or Person Undertaking Project: Larry Lachner (owner) 640 Deodar Lane Bradbury. ca 91010 (626) 446-2175 The City Council 0 Planning Commission 0, having reviewed the Initial Study of this proposed project and having reviewed the written comments received prior to the public meeting of the City Council. including the recommendalton of the City's staff, does hereby find and declare that the proposed project will not have a siginificant effect on the environment A brief statement of the reasons supporting the City Council's findings are as follows: The City Council 0 Planning Commission 0, hereby finds that the Negative Declaration reflects its independent judgement Acopy of the Initial Study may be obtained at: Community Development Division City of Arcadia 240 W. Huntington Dr, Arcadia, CA 91007 (626) 574,5423 The location and custodian of the documents and any other material which constiture the record of proceedings upon which the City based its decision to adopt this Negative Declartion are as follows: Date: Date Posted: Community Development Division City of Arcadia 240 W. Huntington Dr, Arcadia. CA 91007 (626) 574-5423 c: & l1v\~J cL V vv:;J Staff 4/01 . . . File No,: CUP 01-013 CITY OF ARCADIA 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE ARCADIA, cA 91007 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Project Title: Conditional Use Permit; CUP 01-013 2. Lead Agency Name & Address: City of Arcadia Development Services Dept./Community Development Div.lPlanning Services 240 W. Huntington Drive Post Office Box 60021 Arcadia, CA 91066-6021 3. Lead Agency Contact Person & Phone Number: Candyce Burnett, Assistant Planner - (626) 574-5444/ fax (626) 447-9173 4. Project Location (address): 56 E. Duarte Ave. In the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles 5. Project Sponsor's Name, Address & Phone Number: Larry Lachner (owner) 640 Deodar Lane Bradbury, Ca 91010 (626) 446c2175 6. General Plan Designation: The site is designated as Commercial 7. Zoning Classification: The site is zoned C-2-General Commercial Form IIJU -1- CEOA Checklist 4/99 . . . File No.: CUP 01-013 8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project. and any secondary. support, or off-site features necessary'for its implementation.) A Conditional Use Permit (CUP 01-013) to add additional floor space, add a new swimming pool and add the sale and consumption of beer and wine for a 3,200 sq. ft athletic club. 9. Surrounding land uses and setting: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings.) North: Multi-family residential and Commercial; zoned R-3 and C-2 South: Multi-family residential; zoned PR-1, R-2 and R-3 East: Multi-family residential and Commercial; zoned R-3 and C-2 West: Multi-family residential and Commercial; zoned R-3 and C-2 10. Other public agencies whose approval is required: (e.g.. permits. financing approval. participation agreement) The City Building Services, Engineering Division, Fire Marshall, Public Works Services, and Water Services will review the construction plans for compliance with all applicable construction codes and will oversee construction and installation of any necessary infrastructure or improvements within the public right-of-way. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a .Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages: [ ] Aesthetics [ ] Agricultural Resources [ ] Air Quality [ ] Biological Resources [ ] Cultural Resources [ ] Geology I Soils [ ] Hazards & Hazardous Materials [ ] Hydrology I Water Quality [ ] Land Use I Planning [ ] Mineral Resources [ ] Noise [ ] Population! Housing [ ] Public Services [ ] Recreation [ ] Transportation I Traffic [ ] Utilities I Service Systems [ ] Mandatory Findings of Significance Form "J" -2- CEQA Checklist 4/99 File No.: CUP 01-013 DETERMINATION: . (To be completed by the Lead Agency) On the basis of this initial evaluation: [Xl I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [l I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [l I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. . [l I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless mitigated impact" on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. [l I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, but because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. ~ Date: June 4. 2001 Candvce Burnett. Assistant Planner Printed Name & Tille For: City of Arcadia . FormllJ" -3~ CEQA Checklist 4/99 . . . File No.: CUP 01-013 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: 1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the responses following each question. A "No linpact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not 'expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based ona project-specific screening analysis). 2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3, Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate ifthere is substantial evidence that an effect is significant. If there are one or more, "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the determination is made, an EIRis required. 4. "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impacr' to a "Less Than Significant Impact." The I.ead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVIII, "Earlier Analyses," must be cross-referenced). 5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed, Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist, references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference .to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. 7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources. uses or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion, 8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's environmental effects in whatever format is,selected. 9. The explanation of each issue should identify: a) The significant criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. Form "J" -4- CEQA Checklist 4/99 . . . File No.: CUP 01-013 less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact I. AESTHETICS - Would,the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X] b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings. and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? [ ] [ I [ I [X] c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? [ I [ I [ I [X] d) Create a new source of substantial fight or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X] The proposal is for an existing athletic club and will not have such impacts. II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES - (In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.) Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland. Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? [ I [ ] [I [X] b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? [ I [ I [I [XI c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland to non-agricultural use? [ I [ ] [] [X] The proposed at~letic club is consistent with the general plan and zoning designations for the area, and will complement the other uses in the area. III. AIR QUALITY - (Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations.) Would the proposal: a) Conflict with or obstruct Implementation of the applicable Air Quality Plan? [ ] [ ] [I [XI b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? [ ] [ ] [I [XI c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions, which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? [ I [ ] [] [X] d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? [ ] [ ] [] [X] e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? [ ] [ I [] [X] The proposal is for an existing athletic club and will be subject to local air quality regulations as administered by the Couth Coast Air Quality Management District which should prevent any impacts relative to items (b) and (c) above. There are no exterior improvement proposed that would result in alterations to air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause a change in climate. Form"J" CECA Checklist 4199 -5. . . . File No,: CUP 01-013 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impect Incorporation Impact Impact IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies. or regulations, or by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service? [ ] [ ] [] [X] b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, and regulations. or by the Califomia Department of Fish and Game or U. S, Fish and Wildlife Service? [ ] [ ] [] [XI c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vemal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling. hydrological interruption, or other means? [ ] [ ] [1 [X] d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? [ ] [ I [I [XI e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation poliCY or ordinance? [ ] [ I [I [XI f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved local, regional or state habitat conservation plan? [ I [ ] [] [XI The proposed athletic clubwill be an expansion of an existing club. The proposal will not have any impacts on biological resources. v. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in Section 15064.5? [ I [ I [] [X] b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064.5? [ ] [ ] [] [X] c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? [ I [ ] [] [X] d) Disturb any human remains, inCluding those interred outside of formal cemeteries? [ I [ I [] [XI The proposed athletic club will be an expansion of an existing club, The proposal will not have any impacts on cultural resources, VI. GEOLOGY AND SOilS - Would the project: a) Expose. people Or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based Form "J" CEOA Checklist 4/99 -6- . . . File No.: CUP 01-013 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to Division of Mines and Geol09Y Special Publication 42). [ ] [ ] [] [X] iI) Strong seismic ground shaking? [ I [ ] [] [X] iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? [I, [ ] [] [X] iv) Landslides [ I [ ] [] [X] b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss oflopsoil? [ I [ ] [] [X] c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, IiquElfaction or collapse? [ I [ ] [] [X] d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994) creating substantial risks to life or property? [ I [ ] [] [XI e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where 'sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? [ ] [ ] [I [XI While this entire region is subject to the effects of seismic activity. the subject location has not been determined to be especially susceptible to any of the above geological or soil problems. VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions Involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed schOOl? d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a pUblic airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip. would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of, or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Form II J" -1- [ I [Xl [ ] [ ] [ I [Xl [ I [ I [ ] [X] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [ ] [X] [ I [ ] [X] [ ] [ ] [XI [ I [ ] [ ] [ I [XI [ I [ ] [ I [ I [XI CEOA Checl<lisl 4/99 . . . File No.: CUP 01-013 Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact The proposed athletic club will be an expansion of an existing club, which has been designed with consideration already given to the above items. Any proposed tenant improvements will be reviewed by the City Building Services, the City Fire Department. and the County Health Department. VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? [ I [ I [J [XI b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering. of the local groundwater table level (e,g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses. for which permits have been granted)? [ I [ I [I [X] c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the site or area, inclUding through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? [ I [ I [] [X] d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the site or area. inclUding through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on or off-site? [ ] [ I [I [X] e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? [ I [ I [I [XI f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality [ ] [ ] [] [XI g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? [ I [ ] [] [X] h) Place structures within a 100-year flood hazard area. which would impede or redirect flood flows? [ I [ ] [] [X] i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure ofa levee or dam? [ I [ ] [] [X] j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mud flow? [ I [ -] [I [X] The proposed athletic club will be an expansion of an existing club, There are no exterior alterations to the building or site that would result in any of the above impacts. IX. LAND USE & PLANNING - Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? [ I [ ] [] [Xl b) Conflict with anyapplica,ble land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including. but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? [ I [ ] [] [X] c) Conflict with any applicable hab~at conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? [ I [ ] [] [X] The proposed athletic club is consistent with the general plan and zoning designations for the area, and will complement the other uses in the'area. The establishment will be subject to all other environmental plans Form'''JI1 -a- CEOA Checklist 4/99 . . . File No,: CUP 01"01, Less Than Significant Potentially With Less Than Significant Mitigation Signlficant Nc Impact Incorporation Impact Impac or policies adopted by the agencies with jurisdiction over this area. and there are no agricultural resource or operations in the vicinity. X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project: a) Result in tlie loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? [ ] [ ] [] [X b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? [ ] [ ] [] [X The proposed athletic club will be an expansion of an existing club. Any tenant improvements will be required to comply with adopted energy conservation requirements. None of the above impacts have been associated with such establishments. XI. NOISE - Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to, or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance. or applicable standards of other agencies? [ ] [ ] [X] b) Exposure of persons to, or generation of excessive ground borne vibration or groundbome noise levels? [ ] [ ] [X] c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? [ J [ ] [X] d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? [ ] [ ] [X] e) For a project located within an airport land use plan, or where such a plan has not been adopted. within two miles of a pUblic airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? [ ] [ ] [J [X f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? [ ] [ ] [J [X The proposed athletic club will be an expansion of .an existing club and none of the above impacts have been associated with this location or the establishrnent. XII. POPULATION & HOUSING - Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example. by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? [ ] [ ] [] [X b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? [ ] [ ] [] [X cJ Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elseWhere? [ ] [ ] [] [X The proposed athletic club will be an expansion of an existing club and will not impact the population 0 housing. Form "J" -9- CEQA Checklist 4/91 't . . File No.: CUP 01-013 Less Than Significant Potentially WIlh Less Than Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES - Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered govemmental facilities. need for new or physically altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? [ ] [ ] [] [X] b) Police protection? [ ] [ ] [] [X] c) Schools? [ ] [ ] [] [X] d) Parks? [ ] [ ] [] [X] e) Other public facilities? [ ] [ ] [J [X] The proposed athletic club will be an expansion of an existing club. The use is consistent with the planned uses for the subject area and will therefore not result in any of the above impacts. XIV. RECREATION - Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? [ ] [ ] [] [X] b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? [ ] [ ] [] [X] The proposed athletic club will be an expansion of an existing club and will not result in any of the above impacts. XV. TRANSPORTATION I TRAFFIC - Would the project: a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e.. result in a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)? [ ] [ ] [] [X] b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service standard established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? [ ] [ ] [] [XI c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? [ ] [ ] [] [Xl d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g" farm equipment)? [ ] [ J [] [X] e) Result in inadequate emergency access? [ ] [ ] [J [X] f) Result in inadequate parking capacity? [ ] [ ] [] [X] g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation (e.g,. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? [ ] [ ] [] [X] The proposed athletic club will be along an existing commercial strip, and a public throughway which has been designed to avoid any of the above impacts. Furthermore, said subject location has been examined by the City's Traffic Engineer with regard to the proposed establishment and it has been determined that there should not have any pedestrian or vehicular related impacts. Form" J" -10- CECA Checklist 4/99 , . . File No.: CUP 01-013 Less Than Slgnific;ant Potentially With Less Than Signific;ant Mitigation Signlfic;anl No Impact Incorporation Impact Impact XVI. UTILITIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? [ ] [ I [I [XI b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? [ ] [ I [I [X] c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities,the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? [ ] [ I [I [XI d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? [ ] [ I [I [X] e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand In addition to the providers existing commitments? [ ] [ I [I [XI f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? [ ] [ ] [I [XI g) Comply with federal, state and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? [ ] [ I [I [XI The proposed athletic club will be an expansion of an existing club. It is not anticipated that any of the above utilities or service systems will be significantly impacted, XVII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species. cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community. reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of Califomia history or prehistory? [ I [ I [] [X] b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) [ ] [ I [I [X] c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? [ ] [ ] [I [XI The proposed athletic club will be an expansion of an existing club and will not result in any of the above Impacts. XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES No earlier analyses, and no additional documents were referenced pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA processes to analyze the project. Form llJ" CECA Checklist 4/99 -11- -. Date Filed: FileNo. ('.-u..(I (')\ -0 l ~ CITY OF ARCADIA 240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE ARCADIA, CA 91007 Lf I ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM 7-~/o~ General Information . 1. Applicant's Name: L-v}'R,(2'l U+C~eIL Address: (P l..{O \') EtrOf\R ~ ~ P:>~f3t.>{U.\ I rA-. q I (), 0 Property Address (Location): 5'(" r;;;. llh)fuvtE- rzoM fl-f2-0A-0vA 1 dt ~ LOO~ Assessor's Number: .'i78 I ODS D;l..(J 6>0 000 2. 3. Name, a~~on to be c;.ontacted concerning this p~_ . 0'10 J)~ 0Ifn- b 'PJ~e,UflA.\.) rA-. ~I(\L() ((Ol:bJ_~I~~-;-'Z-L IS- ;~f-~. '.~ I"~ I, 'I List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals 'required for this project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal a~cies: '/.1">'\-.'" ~I (" A-Nil But vita UG 4. , o 5. ('-7 6. General Plan Designation: (' """"^w 0 ^.u .. Zone Classification: Proiect Descriptioo 10. 7. Proposed use of site (project description): 1l-OD CTI.DN ()-p. A- SW \"V\i\.1N\ \ tJ 6 A:x:J L ........ ~ Aft.c-A-oLA- fh...L -Pr7@ ~ L C-L.UB. Site size: I "7/ Y f1quT.s Square footage per building: '3 '2. \ DOC> Number of floors of construction: Q... 8. 9. 11. Amount of off-street parking provided: ~ 12. 13. .14. Proposed scheduling of project: "3 -~ ~N~S. Anticipated incremental development: If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or rents, and type of household sizes expected: N' 4-- 15. -. 16. 18. If commercial, indicate the type, i.e. neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and loading facilities, hours of operation: .M - '11t '5"':' 30 'ft-rv\. '"'ti) Il ~oo PM. R't-I 5'30 Jtw\ --ro q "to Ph1 S tI\1i DA'( ! S A=t\fTt-~~ ~ '.00 fttJ'- ''It> 5' "'00 AM. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities: _N'A- 17. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project: to-tA- If the project involves a variance, conditional use permit or zoning application, state this and indicate clearly wh):' the application is'required: It- CON .l)r:no-N-M- U S~ ff5f2.vr\\. 'T 13 ~v\...~ iD (+00 -A- 5lA..h, ~W\.\."-1~ POO l...- oN ~ 8'[(E12.\0IL ttNO r;:=ofL 11tb B,*I!.-/wlI'fs L..{ CEl'\J'S"c--, Discuss below all items checked yes (attach additional Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? . sheets as necessary). 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. .27. 19. Change in existing features of any hills, or substantial alteratin of ground contours. YES NO D ~ D "ZJ D ~ D 'iZI D ta D 12!l D 19 D ~ D 1:81 E.I.R. 04/12/00 Page 2 Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or publiclands or roads Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage pattersn. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity. Is site on filled land or on any slopes of 10 percent or more. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable or explosives. .2~. 29. 30. 31. 32. 33. 34. YES NO Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water,. sewage, etc.) CJ ~ CJ ~ CJ ~ CJ 'J2! Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects. Storm water system discharges from areas for materials storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage delivery or loading docks, or other outdoor work areas? Asignificantly environmentally harmful increase in the flow rate or vol\I!De of storm water runoff'] CJ ~ A significantly environmentally harmful increase in erosion of the project site or surrounding areas? CJ ~ Storm water discharges that would significantly impair the beneficial uses of receiving waters or areas that provide water quality benefits (e,g. riparian corridors, wetlands, etc.)? CJ ~ Harm to the biological integrity of drainage systems and water bodies? D 1ZI .35. Envir~nmenlal Settinl! 36. Describe (on a separate sheet) the project site as it exists before the project, including information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted. 37. Describe (on a separate. sheet) the surrounding properties, including information on plants, animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land uses (residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land uSe (one-family, apartment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set- backs, rear yards, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroidphotos will be accepted. Certification I hereby certilY that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the. facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. Date . 3 -2..(0 -0 I ~t_~ Signature E.I.R. 04/12100 Page 3