HomeMy WebLinkAbout1639
.
.
.
RESOLUTION 1639
A.RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
01-009 TO EXPAND THE HOURS OF OPERATION, AND ADD THE SALE
AND CONSUMPTION OF BEER AND WINE FOR A RESTAURANT USE AT
206 S, FIRST AVE.
WHEREAS, on April 5, 2001, a conditional use permit application was filed
by Rebecca Wang to expand the' hours of operation, and add the sale and consumption of
beer and wine for a restaurant use, Development Services Department Case No. C.U.P.
01-009, at use at 206 S. First Avenue, and more particularly described as:
Lot 35 of Arcadia Santa Anita Tract in the City of Arcadia, County of Los
Angeles, State of California, as recorded in the Office of the County Recorder of
said County.
WHEREAS, A public hearing was held on May 22, 2001, at which time all
interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence;
NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the factual data submitted by the Development Services
Department in the attached report is true and correct.
SECTION 2, This Commission finds:
l,That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to
the public health or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or
vicinity because the initial study did not disclose any substantial adverse affects to the
area affected by the proposed project.
.
2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is a proper use for which a
Conditional Use Permit is authorized.
3. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate said use, All yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking, loading, landscaping and
other features are adequate to adjust said use with the land and uses in the neighborhood.
The proposed project complies with all related zoning requirements as set forth in the
Arcadia Municipal Code,
4, That the site ablits streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type
to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use.
5. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the
comprehensive General Plan because the land use and current zoning are consistent with
the General Plan.
6. That the new exterior design elements for the subject building are in
. compliance with the design criteria set forth in the City's Architectural Design Review
Regulations.
7, That the use applied for will not have a substantial adverse impact on the
environment, and that based upon the record as a whole there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have any potential for an adverse. effect on wildlife resources or the
habitat upon which the wildlife depends.
SECTION 3, That for the foregoing reasons this Commission grants a
Conditional Use Permit, to expand the hours of operation, and add the sale and
consumption of beer and wine for a restaurant use at 206 S. First Ave, subject to the
following conditions:
I. That building code compliance and conditions of approval must be met to the
complete satisfaction of the Inspection Services Officer, All ADA requirements shall be
meet for disabled access; parking,restrooms, door hardware, and entrances,
.
2
1639
.
.
.
2. All City code requirements regarding accessibility, fire protection, occupancy,
and safety shall be complied with to the satisfaction of Building Services and the Fire
Department which shall include, but are not limited to the following items:
a, A Knox-box with keys shall be installed in conformance with Uniform Fire
Code, per UFC 904.
b, An NFPA-72 Fire Alarm System shall be installed in accordance with the
Uniform Building Code and all other applicable provisions of the Arcadia
Municipal Code (3114.1).
c. Provide occupant load signs at all locations within the occupancy, Provide
seating plan and have in posted in the manager's office for inspection.
d, Exit illumination shall comply with See, 1211 UFC,
e. Thatall exit doors shall be equipped with panic hardware as defined in the
building code. AU interior doors shall open in the direction of travel.
3, That a modification be granted for 5 on-site parking spaces in lieu of 10 for the
restaurant use, This parking Modification does not constitute an approval of a general
reduction of the parking requirement for the entire site, but rather only for the specific use
approved by this CUP.
4. That CUP 01-009 shall not take affect until the owner and applicant have
executed a form available at the Planning Office indicating awareness and acceptance of
the conditions of approval.
6. That the outdoor dining shall comply with the City's Incidental Outdoor Dining
Regulations.
5, Noncompliance with the provisions and conditions of this conditional use permit
shall constitute grounds for its immediate suspension or revocation.
SECTION 4. The decision, findings and conditions contained in this Resolution
reflect the Commission's action of May 22, 2001, and.the following vote:
3
1639
.
.
.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Huang, Olson, Murphy
None
Bruckner, Kalemkiarian
SECTION 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and
shall cause a copy to be forwarded to the City Council of the City of Arcadia.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the forgoing Resolution was adopted at a regular
meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd clay of May 2001, by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Huang, Olson, Murphy
None
Bruckner, Kalemkiarian
APPROVED AS TO FQRM:
~1M-P ~
Stephen P. Deitsch, City Attorney
4
1639
SfAFF REPORT
Development Services Department
May 22, 2001
TO: Arcadia City Planning Commission
FROM: Corkran W. Nicholson, Planning Services Manager
By: Candyce Burnett, Assistant Planner
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 01-009
SUMMARY
This Conditional Use Permit application was submitted by Rebecca Wang to expand
the hours of operation, and add the sale and consumption of beer and wine for a
1,900 sq. ft. restaurant use at 206 S. First Avenue.
.
The Development Services Department is recommending approval of CUP 01-009
and adoption of Resolution 1639 granting the conditional use permit subject to the
conditions in this staff report,
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Rebecca Wang (tenant)
LOCATION: 206 S. First Avenue
REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit. to change the hours of operation and to
add the sale and consumption of beer ancl wine at the subject
location.
SITE AREA: 6,075 sq,ft. (0,14 acres)
FRONTAGES: 45 feet along First Avenue
EXISTING LAND USE & ZONING:
The site is developed with a 3,650 sq,ft. commercial building with 5 on-site
parking spaces behind the building. Tenant improvements consist of the
.
.
.
.
..
subject restaurant at 1,900 sq. ft" and a 1 ,750 sq. ft. office space, The site is
zoned CBD-Central Business District.
SURROUNDING LAND USES & ZONING:
North: Retail; zoned CBD
South: Retail and offices; zoned CaD
East: Multi-family residential; zoned R-3
West: Retail; zoned CBD
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNA nON:
The site is designated as Mixed Use-Commercial/Multiple Family
BACKGROUND
On October 28, 1997, the Planning Commission approved CUP 97-011 to operate a
delicatessenlrestaurant business at 206 S, First Avenue, At that time the business
was approved for indoor seating for 20 people and outdoor seating for 16 people.
The hours of operation were Monday through Saturday 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p,m,
The original restaurant use went oLit of business in July 1999, whereupon, AC
Catering utilized the pre-existing CUP, and occupied the space until February of
2001. The applicant wishes to reopen a restaurant business at the subject location,
and expand the hours of operation and add the sale and consumption of beer and
wine, A business license was issued to the applicant in April 2001 to operate a
restaurant business at the subject'location und.er the pre-existing C.U.P, 97-011.
PROPOSAL AND ANALYSIS
The applicant, is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to expand the hours of
operation, and to add the sale and consumption of beer and wine at 206 First
Avenue. Currently, the permitted hours of operation are Monday thru Saturday, 8:00
am to 6:00 pm. The proposed hours are Thursday thru Tuesday, 11 :30 am to 2:00
pm and 6:00 pm to 11 :30 pm.
PARKING
Currently, there are five (5) existing parking spaces behind the subject building, Staff
anticipates that such spaces will be used by the tenants and employees of the
restaurant and office use, and that the customers of such businesses will either utilize
street parking, or will walk from the neighboring business.
CUP 01-009
May 22, 2001
Page 2
.
.
.
.
In the CBD zone, a change in use or occupancy of an existing building is eligible to
utilize the shared-use parking standards. In this case, the former tenant was a
restaurant/catering business. Therefore, the applicant's business requires seven (7)
parking spaces and the existing 1,750 sq. ft. office use requires three (3) spaces for
an on-site parking requirement of ten (10) parking spaces. Parking is not required to
be provided for the incidental outdoor dining area,
Based on the shared-use parking standards for the CBD zone, there is a five (5)
parking space deficiency for the site. Such deficiency was approved for the previous
restaurant business that occupied this space. Staff's opinion is that the parking
deficiency is insignificant, because of the ample on-street parking, and that the
expansion of hours of operation and consumption of beer and wine on the site should
not substantially alter the type of pedestrian oriented business that was promoted
and encouraged by the previous restaurant use.
ANALYSIS
Uses such as a restaurant requires a conditional use permit, and traffic concerns can
be addressed as part of the consideration of such applications, Generally, staff does
not encourage uses, which are deficient in parking, however, based upon the
applicant's proposal, iUs staff's opinion that the proposed use would be appropriate
for the site.
The applicant shall be required to comply with all code requirements as determined
necessary by the Byilding Official, Fire Marshall, Public Works Services Director and
Community Development Administrator.
CEQA
Pursuant to the provIsions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the
Development Services Department has prepared an initial study for the proposed
project. Said initial study did not disclose any substantial or potentially substantial
adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the
project including land; air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise and objects of
historical or aesthetic significance. When considering the record as a whole, there is
no evidence that the proposed project will have any potential for adverse effect on
wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Therefore, a
Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project.
CUP 01-009
May 22, 2001
Page 3
.
.
.
.
RECOMMENDATION
The Development Services Department recommends approval of Conditional Use
Permit No. CUP 01-009 subject to the following conditions:
1. The restaurant shall be maintained and operated in a manner that is consistent
with the application and plans submitted and approved for CUP 01-009,
2. That the outdoor dining shall comply with the City's Incidental Outdoor Dining
Regulations,
3, All City code requirements regarding accessibility, fire protection, occupancy,
and safety shall be complied with to the satisfaction of Building Services and the
Fire Department
4, Approval of CUP 01-009 shall. not take effect until the property owner and
applicant have executed and filed the Acceptance Form available from the
Development Services Department to indicate acceptance of the conditions of
approval.
5, All conditions of approval shall be complied with prior to the opening of the
expanded hours and sale of beer and wine, Noncompliance with the plans,
provisions and conditions of CUP 01-009 shall be grounds for immediate
suspension or revocation ,of any approvals for the remedial tutoring center,
FINDINGS AND MOTIONS
Approval
The Planning Commission should move to approve and file the Negative Declaration
and adopt Resolution No. 1639: A Resolution of the Planning CommisSion of the City
of Arcadia, California, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 01-009 to operate a
educational learning center.
Denial
If the Planning Commission intends to deny this Conditional Use Permit application,
the Commission should state the reasons for denial and direct staff to prepare the
appropriate resolution incorporating the Commission's decision and specific findings,
CUP 01-009
May 22, 2001
Page 4
.
.
.
.
If any Planning Commissioner, or other interested party has any questions or
comments regarding this matter prior to the May 22, 2001 public hearing, please
contact Assistant Planner, Candyce Burnett at (626) 574-5444.
Corkran W. Nicholson
Community Development Administrator
Attachments: Land Use and Zoning Map
Plans
Negative Declaration & Initial Study
Resolution 1639
CUP 01-009
May 22, 2001
Page 5
.
.
.
'." " ..
~---t-A I .,. P~rkID;'LDI ~W-1I.J, - 'I r
hintSron
., ~
.r:=:, . , u i:Q , . I
Drapery Shop Tn Consultant U ~
hwcinz Shop
lmpol'kr~S OfrlC'C . ....... CD
~ Bc:.ul)'Saloft I
>
Beauty Salon <: P'llOto:npb)' $b1dill CD 0 [-0]
BeauI)' Supplies - Pb)oRc:a1 Therapist
... I
0 0 0 0 I
" Business Urpel Sbop 0 G
om", T anninz Shop
.
!
BONITA ST.
,
-
11,' ,l'nunc Shop Florist 0 0 (~) 0
0 Bod.)' Care Salon 0
_.5<>...,. J.a.tmior'~== Shop
S.IoD Jcwdry Sbop ~;~~~~t~~~:~:~~:~;~f??:~~:t~~Z~~:~~
.. 0
Costumt:5 &. Antique Ca1fShap Offiee
Skia Care s.toa
Nail SaJOlI Roofin: CoiJll'atIDr ~
Walc:r FUter Sto~ R<>l1Y 011'0.. A
.t<'I ~ ~ ~
, ;- ~ , I
,r:=: u u , ~
..""', I
DenlUt Furn. &: Cat'pd Sbop
.....anl
, Sponm: Cooch 3
TWtlStol')' N
Eo< Dinn1umt' .
B1Uiaess Office Bid:. 'f
en ...... ~
0 !::'.:
0 E ; ..""'. ..... 0 0 CD G
. w , r;;.. ColfStoR
-c
~5 florm
, , ,. !
, , ... . . .
CALIFORNIA ST.
I I C-2 In (JIG 18 IGj
R-3 Middle Sobool Arc:adia House
Land Use and Zoning Map
206 S. First Ave. tNORTH
CUP 01-009 Scale: 1 inch = 200 feet
~
1-----------------------------------------------
1 I
I
I ;'Ik1,'VGRESTAURANT TENANT: ::-----L-...
206 S FIRST AVE, TEL: (626)641-9335 ------r--=
ARCADIA, CA lONE: C-1 I
I
I
-_._------------------~
BONITA STREET
135'
FIRST AVE,
~. SKYLlGHT~
.0 0
~ ~. H,V,A,C.
::::::::::::::::::::::::;~=::===:=:====:==========~
in
..,.
X JOINTED SUITE NOT APART\
PLOT PLANI ROOF PLAN 1116- = 1'-0
..
.
.
PARKING LOTS
,
I
,
I
,
I
,
I
,
I
.
8'-1
,
I
,
I
.
I
.
I
N
9'
9' 9'
9'
=
-----------------------~
PLAN DRAWN BY: MAXIMA BUILDER. INC,
3018 DURFEE AVE. #B
EL MONTE. CA91732
TEL: (626)454-4688
ORVILLE WANG .
.
N
..
.
..
.. STORAGE
n DINNING m
HA~O SINK
FRONT COUNTER rl ..
DINNING ~ KITCHEN
BACK COUNTER
ffi
flOOR SINK'
""
30'1 Ir.F MAK1=R II 24'3 II 18'6
;/aI/lib RESTAURANT
206 S, FIRST AVE.
ARCADIA, CA
TENANT:
TEL: 626-641-9335
13'8
FLOOR PLAN
'/8":1'.0
PLAN DRAWN BY; MAXIMNA BUILDER, INC,
3018 DURFEE AVE, #B
EL MONTE, CA91732
TEL: 6264544688
ORVILLE WANG
.
.
.
.
.
( ,
File No.:
CUP 01-009
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 W. HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
A. Title and Description of Project:
A Conditional Use Permit (CUP 01-009) to change the hours of operation and to add the sale and
consumption of beer and wine at an existing restaurant.
B. Location of Project:'
206 S, First Avenue
In the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles
C. Name of Applicant, Sponsor or Person Undertaking Project:
, Rebecca Wang (tenant)
1012 S, San Gabriel Blvd, #613
San Gabriel, Ca 91776
(626) 641-9.335
The City Council 0 Planning Commission 0,. having reviewed the Initial Study of this proposed project
and having reviewed the written comments received prior to the public meeting of the City Council,
including .the recommendaiton of the City's staff, does hereby find and declare that the proposed project
will not have a siginificant effect on the environment. A brief statement of the reasons supporting the City
Council's findings are. as follows:
The City Council 0 Planning Commission 0, hereby finds that the Negative Declaration reflects its
independent judgement. A copy of the Initial Study may be obtained at
Community Development Division
City of Arcadia
240 W, Huntington Dr,
Arcadia, CA 91007
(626) 574-5423
The location and custodian of the documents and any other matarial which constiture the record of
proceedings. upon which the City based its decision to adopt this Negative Declartion are as follows:
Date:
Date Posted:
Community Development Division
City of Arcadia
240 W. Huntington Dr, '
Arcadia, CA 91007
(626) 574-5423
, r/O-.Vl G\~.f1 ~ll.. i ~ *
Staff "
4/01
.
File No,: CUP 01-009
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. ProjectTitle:
Conditional Use Permit; CUP 01-009
2. Lead Agency Name & Address:
City of Arcadia'
Development Services Dept./Community DevelopmentDiv.lPlanning Services
240 W. Huntington Drive
Post Office Box 60021
Arcadia, CA 91066-6021
3. Lead Agency Contact Person & Phone Number:
. Candyce Bumett, Assistant Planner - (626) 574-54441 fax (626) 447-9173
.
4. Project Location (address):
206 S. First Ave.
In the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles
5. Project Sponsor's Name, Address & Phone Number:
Rebecca Wang (tenant)
1012 S. San Gabriel Blvd. #813
San Gabriel, Ca 91776
(626) 641-9335
6. General Plan Designation:
The site is designated as Mixed Use-CommerciallMultiple Family
7. Zoning Classification:
The site is zoned CBD-Central Business District
Form "J"
-1-
CEQA Checklist 4/99
.
.
.
(
Rle No.: CUP 01-009
.
8. Description of Project:
(Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to latar phases of the project. and any secondary,
support, or off-site features necessary'for its Implementation,)
A Conditional Use Permit (CUP 01-009) to change the hours of operation and to add
the sale and consumption of beer and wine at an existing restaurant.
9. Surrounding land uses and setting:
(Briefly describe the project's surroundings,)
North: Retail; zoned CBD
South: Retail and offices; zoned CBD
East: Multi-family residential; zoned R-3
West: Retail; zoned CBD
10. Other public agencies whose approval is required:
(e,g" permits, flnancing approval, participation agraement)
The City Building Services, Engineering Division, Fire Marshall, Public Works
Services, and Water Services will review the construction plans for compliance with
all applicable construction codes and will oversee construction and installation of
any necessary infrastructure or improvements within the public right-of-way.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this
project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as
indicated by the checklist on the following pages:
[ ] Aesthetics
[ ] Agricultural Resources
[ ] Air Quality
[ ] Biological Resources
[ ] Cultural Resources
[ ] Geology I Soils
[ ] Hazards & Hazardous Materials
[ ] Hydrology I Water Quality
[ ] Land Use I Planning
[ ] Mineral Resources
[ ] Noise
[ ] Population I Housing
[ ] Public Services
[ ] Recreation
[ ] Transportation I Traffic
[ ] Utilities I Service Systems
[ ] Mandatory Findings of Significance
Form"J"
-2-
CEQA Checklist 4/99
.
.
.
File No,: CUP 01-009
.
DETERMINATION:
(To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
[Xl I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared,
[l I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions
in the project have been made by or agreed to by the applicant. A MITIGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[] I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
[l I find that the proposed project MAY have a "potentially significant impact" or
"potentially significant unless mitigated impact" on the environment, but at feast
one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures
based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is r~quired, but it must analyze only the
effects that remain to be addressed.
[J I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, but because all potentially significant effects (a) have been
analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant
to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation
measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is
required.
,."Q.~ ~~ LV
Date: Mav 2. 2001
Candvce Burnett. Assistant Planner
Printed Name & Title
For: City of Arcadia
Form IlJn
-3-
CEOA Checklist 4/99
.
.
.
File No,: CUP 01-009
.
-EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1, A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately
supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the responses following each question, A
"No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact
simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e,g" the project falls outside a fault rupture
zone), A 'No Impact" answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well
as general standards (e,g", the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a
project-specific screening analysis).
2, All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site,
cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational
impacts.
3, Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist
answers must indicate whether the Impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation,
or less than significant "Potentially Significantlmpacf' is appropriate if there is substantial evidence
that an effect is significant. If there are one or more, "Potentially Significantlmpacf' entries when the
determination is made, an EIR is required.
4, "Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporatec!" applies where the
incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impacf' to a
"Less Than Significantlmpacl." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly
explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation measures from Section
XVIII, "Earlier Analyses," must be cross-referenced).
5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEOA process, an
effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration, Section
15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analyses Used, Identify and state where they are available for review,
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed, Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards,
and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less Than Significant With Mitigation Measures
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier
document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
6, Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist, references to information sources for
potential impacts (e.g", general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or
outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the
statement is substantiated,
7. Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources, uses or
individuals contacted should be cited In the discussion.
8. This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead
agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project's
environmental effects i/1 whatever format is selected,
9, The explanation of each Issue should identify: '
a) The significant criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant.
Form "J"
-4-
CEQA Checklist 4/99
.
.
.
File No,: CUP 01-009
.
Less Than
Slgnifieant
Petentlally W~h Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorperation Impact Impect
I. AESTHETICS - Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not
limited to. trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings
within a state scenic highway? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality
ofthe site and its surroundings? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which
would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? [ ] [ ] [ ] [X]
The proposal is for an existing restaurant use' and will not have such impacts.
II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES - (In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are
significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the Califomia Agricultural Land Evaluation
and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an
optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland.) Would the'project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of
Statewide Importance (Farmland) as shown on the maps
prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring
Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-
agricultural use? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
b) Confiict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due
to their location or nature, could result in conversion of
Farmland to non-agricultural use? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
The proposed eating establishment is consistent with the general plan and zoning designations for the
area, and will complement the other uses in the area,
III. AIR QUALITY - (Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality
management or pollution coritrol district may be relied upon to make the following determinations,)
Would the proposal:
a) Conflictwith or obstruct implementation of the applicable Air
Quality Plan? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
b) Violate any air quailly standard or contribute substantially to
an existing or projected air quality violation? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
c) Resuit in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any
criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-
attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air
quality standard (including releasing emissions, which
exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of .
people? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
The proposed eating establishment will be in an existing restaurant and will be subject to local air quality
regulations as administered by,the Couth Coast Air Quality Management District which should prevent any
impacts reiative to items (b) and (c) above, There, are no exterior improvement proposed that would result
in alterations to air movement, moisture or temperature, or cause a change in climate.
Form "J"
-5-
CECA Checl<lIst 4/99
.
.
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project
a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through
habitat modifications, on any species identified as a
candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or
regional plans, policies, or' regulations, or by the California
Department of Fish and Game Of U, S, Fish and Wildlife
Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or
other sensitive natural community identified In local or
regional plans, policies, and regulations, or by the Califomia
Department of Fish and Game or U. S. Fish and Wildiife
Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected
wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act
(Including, but not limited tb, marsh, vernal pool, coastal,
etc,) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption,
or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native
resident or migratory fish or wildlife species, or with
establls~ed native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or
impede the use of native wild life nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting
biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or
ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan,
or other approved local, regional or stata habitat
conservation plan?
The proposed eating establishment will be in an existing restaurant.
impacts on biological resources,
.
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance 'of a
historical resource as defined in Section 15064,5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
archaeological resource pursuant to Section 15064,5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological
resource or sita or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside
of formal cemeteries?
The proposed eating establishment will be in an existing restaurant.
impacts on cultural resources,
.
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on
the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning
Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based
Form "JlI
-&-
File No,: CUP 01-009
Less Than
Significant
Potentially With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporation Impact Impact
[ 1
[ 1
[ ]
[ ],
[ 1
[ J
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ 1
[X]
[X]
[Xl
[Xl
[X]
[ ] [ 1 [] [X]
The proposal will not have any
[ ]
[ 1
[ ]
[ ]
[ 1
[ ]
[ ]
[ 1
[ ]
[X]
[X]
[X]
[ 1 [ I [] [X]
The proposal will not have any
CECA Checklist 4/99
.
.
.
.
FileNo,: CUP 01-009
Less Than
Significant
PotenUally With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact IncorporaUon Impact Impact
on other substantial evidence of a known fault? (Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42), [ ] [ 1 [] [Xl
II) Strong seismic ground shaking? [ ] [ ] [l [X]
Hi) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? [ ] [ 1 [l [Xl
iv) Landslides [ ] [ ] [l [Xl
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? [ 1 [ ] [l [Xl
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that
would become unstable as a result of the project, and
potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading,
subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? [ 1 [ ] [l [Xl
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of '
the Uniform Building Code (1994) creating substantial risks
to life or property? [ ] [ ]. [] [Xl
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of
septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems
where sewers are not available for the disposal of
wastewater? [ 1 [ ], [] [X]
While this entire region is subject to the effects of seismic activity, the subject location has not been
determined to be especially susceptible to any of the above geological or soil probiems,
VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materlals?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident
conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into
the environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materlals, substances, or waste within one-
quarter mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous
materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code
Section 65962.5 and. as a result, would it create a significant
hazard to the public'or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan, or
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of
a public airport or public use airport, would the project result
In a. safety hazard for people residing or working In the
project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or
working in the project area?
g) Impair implementation of, or physically interfere with an
adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation
plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant rlsk of loss,
injury. or death involving wildland fires, including where
wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where
residences are intermixed with wildlands?
Form "J"
-7-
[ 1
[ ]
[ ]
[Xl
[ 1
[ ]
[ ]
[Xl
[ 1
[ ]
[ ]
[X]
[ 1
[ 1
[ ]
[Xl
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[X]
f]
[ ]
[ J
[Xl
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[X]
[ 1
[ 1
[ ]
[X]
CEQACheckllst 4/99
.
.
.
File No,: CUP 01-009
Less Than
Significant
. Potentially With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporetlon Impact Impact
The proposed" eating establishment will be in an existing restaurant which has been designed with
consideration already given to the above items. Any proposed tenantimprovements will be reviewed by the
City Building Services, the City Fire Department, and the County Health Department.
VIII. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements? ' [ ] [ ] [] [Xl
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there
would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the
local groundwater table level (e,g" the production'rate of pre-
existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not
support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits
have been granted)? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or
area, including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial
erosion or siltation on- or off-site? [ ] [ ] [l [Xl
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or
area, Including through the alteration of the course of a
stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount
of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding
on or off-site? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems
or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? [ ] [ ] [] [Xl
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality [ ] [ 1 [] [Xl
g) Place housing within a 1 DO-year flood hazard area as
mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood
Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
h) Place structures within a 1 DO-year flood hazard area, which
would impede or redirect flood flows? [ ] [ ] [l [Xl
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss,
Injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a
result of the failureQf a levee or dam? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
The proposed eating establishment will be in an existing restaurant. There are no exterior alterations to the
building or site thatw~uld result in any of the above Impacts,
IX. LAND USE & PLANNING - Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community? [ ] [ 1 [J [X]
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or
regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project
(including, but not limited to, the general plan, specific plan,
local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? [ ] [ ] [l [X]
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or
natural community conservation plan? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
The proposed eating establishment is consistent with the general plan and zoning designations for the
area, and will complement the other uses in the area, The establishment will be subject to all other
Form It J"
-8-
CEOA Checklist 4/99
.
.
.
FIle No:: CUP 01-009
Less Than
Significant
" Potentially With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporation Impact Impact
environmental plans or policies adopted by the agencies with jurisdiction oV,er this area, and 'there are no
agricultural resources or operations in the vicinity,
X. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project
a) Result In the loss of availability of a known mineral resource
that would be of value to the region and the residents of the
state? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
b) Result in the loss of, availability of a locally important mineral
resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan,
specific plan or other land use plan? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
The proposed eating establishment will be in an existing restaurant Any tenant improvements will be
required to comply with adopted energy conservation requirements, None of the above impacts have been
associated with such establishments,
XI. NOISE - Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to, 'or generation of noise levels, in
excess of standards established in the local general plan or
noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? [ ] [ ] [X] []
b) Exposure of persons to, or generation of excessive
groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels? [ I [ ] [X] []
c) A substantial permanent increase In ambient noise levels in
the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? [ ] [ ] [X] []
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient
noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project? [ ] [ ] [X] []
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan, or
where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of
a public airport or public use airport, would the project
expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project area
to excessive noise levels? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
The proposed eating establishment will be in an existing restaurant and none of the above impacts have
been associated with this location or the establishment.
XII. POPULATION & HOUSING - Would the project:
a) Induce substantial popUlation growth in an area, either
directly (for example, by proposing new homes and
businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of
roads or other infrastructure)? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement housing
elsewhere? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
The proposed eating establishment will be in an existing restaurant and will not impact the population or
housing.
Form" J"
.9-
CEQA Checklist 4/99
.
.
.
File No,: CUP 01-009
Less Than
Significant
. Potentially With' Less Than
SignifICant Mnlgation Significant No
Impact Incorpollltlon Impact Impact
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES - Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated
with the provision of new or physically altered govemmentai facilities, need for new or physically
altered governmental facilities, the construction of which would cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance'-
objectives for any of the public services:
a) Fire protection? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
b) Police protecti~n? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
c) Schools? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
d) Parks? [ ] [] , [] [X]
e) Other public facilities? [ ] [ ] [] [Xl
The proposed eating establishment will be in an existing restaurant. The use is consistent with the
planned uses for the subject area and will therefore not result in any of the above impacts,
XIV. RECREATION - Woulp the project:
a) Increase the use of eXisting neighborhood and fegional parks
or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? \ ] [ ) I) IX]
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational facilities which
might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
The proposed eating establishment will be in an existing restaurant and will not result in any of the above
impacts,
XV. TRANSPORTATION I TRAFFIC - Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial'in relation to
the existing traffic load and capacity of the street system
(I.e, , result in a substantial increase in either the number of
vehicle trips, the volume 'to capacity ratio on roads, or
congestion atintersections)? [ ) [ ] [] [X]
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service
standard established by the county congestion management
agency for designated roads or highways? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
c) Result in a chang\! in air traffic patterns, including either an
increase in traffic lave Is or a change in location that results In
substantial safety risks? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
d) Substantially increase Iiazards due to a design feature (e,g.,
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible
uses (e,g., farm equipment)? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? [ ] [ ] [] [X)
t) Result in inadequate parking capacity? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting
alternative transportation (e,g" bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? [ ] [ ] [) [X]
The proposed eating establishment will be along an existing commercial strip, and recentiy reconfigured
public throughway which has been designed to avoid any of the above impacts, Furthermore. said subject
location has been examined by the City's Traffic Engineer with regard to the proposed establishment and it
has been determined that there should not have any pedestrian or vehicular related impacts.m
Form "J"
-10.
CECA Checklist 4199
.
.
.
XVI. UTILITIES & SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment reqLiirements of the applicable
Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects?
c) Require or result In the construction of new storm water
drainage facilities or expansion of eXisting facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project
from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or
expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result In a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider. which serves or may serve the project that it has
adequate capacity to serve the projecfs projected demand in
addition to the providers existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state an,d iocal statutes and regulations
related to solid waste? [ ] [ ] [] [Xl
The proposed eating establishment will be in an existing restaurant. It is not anticipated that any of the
above utilities or service systems will be significantly impacted.
'.
File No,: CUP 01-009
Less Than
Significant
Potentially With Less Than
Significant Mitigation Slgnificent No
Impact Incorporation Impact Impact
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[X]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[X]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[X]
[ ]
[ ]
[ J
[X]
[ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[Xl
[ ]
[ 1
[ ]
[X]
XVII. MANDA TORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of
the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a /ish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or
animal community'; reduce the number or restrict the range of
a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important
examples, of the major periods of California history or
prehistory? [ ] [ ] [] Pc]
.
b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited,
but cumuiatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project are
considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of
past projects, the effects of other current projects. and the
effects of probable future projects.) [ ] [ ] [] [X]
c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will
cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectiy? [ ] [ ] [] [X]
The proposed eating establishment will be in an existing restaurant and will not result in any of the above
impacts.
XVIII. EARLIER ANALYSES
No earlier analyses, and no additional documents were referenced pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or
other CEQA processes to analyze the project,
Form "J"
-11-
CECA Checklist 4/99
Date Filed;
1 ,,-."
-{t"
File No, --C! . t?/-CiYf
'f15/d/
I I
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
:, ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
General Information
.
1.
Applicant's Name: /2efea1L ~,
Address: 10 /,t, ~, <:nd ~/l.b/1.id, :tJ $/5
Property Address (Location); 2/) In ,< ,r; I' .sf .,<;r/b.
Assessor's Number: tv If(
Stt-A/ t;/Ah-d, 6t- ,9171b
,h~tt., ('A-flOo c:,
2,
3.
N arne, address and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project~ I
, ~vJ~
/0/'2. .$, SaN e;ttbr;e.I, :/1&/3 Sv./ tf,dr-i-e/ / U-t177b f4~{;.)tt)./-?;?J..r
4,
List and describe any other related permits and other. public approvals required for this project, including those
re'l.uired by city, regional, state and federal agencies;
S, Zone Classification: '
eAD
jll;)(eo! a>e- _
6}-"".I./'7'/".I/ /p'lP,/k.
/ 7.#171
Sd,P i ~/A' tM/) tJi/V.&
6. General Plan Designation:
Proiect DescriDtion
.-'
7,
Proposed use of site (project description):
1t6$..f~f- ,
8.
ivrli...- .410...>1-/ (,;/'.////,,_
;qO?~ .1f' I-i-
Square footage per building: 36.s-o Sf'
Number of floors of construction: t9/zI? ___
Site size:
9,
fr' fJek4/ 6/L,/dt::}
eV\'~ 6W
10.
I!.
Amount of off-street parking provided:
tlJ
/v/ /t
12.
Proposed scheduling of project:
13.
Anticipated incremental development:
If residential. include the number 0 units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale' prices or rents, and type of
household sizes expected: rpr
rf oommercial, indicate the type, Le. neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square footage of sales area, and
loading facilities, hours of operation; LL ,I L A I ~ 1 / J,. J _
, !L M4~ (aj GMl1e.-5'l'_ Ttmd, Tn" rvu-
'of ,
/tb.)j~..-/iA P?.J./'Ad-~ ~'" ~P/~ ~ ~/Cb ,hr aJlle/'e#1- hNl-"'; ,fop;' Iz{L s.tk5
tt.Ma.. /",$ /f'Pl) S"~ 1+ ~,;$ ~ W,y .,1u;,67'/'t!'Si W Iltrdl:m Mu.rs /.5 7'~.
16, 1f industrial, indicate' type: estimated employment per s6Iit: ~d loading facilities;
15.
.
~
17, If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated occupancy, loading
facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project:
W1
18" If the project involves a variance, conditional use permit or zoning application, state this and indicate clearly
why the application is required:
~':1J1y j;J1\ ~>7m,4/ U$.f.//e'I'Y7?,-I-.7fn... r~_ ~pp. ~ 1Jhe.-- d~ l.ul'ld J ~
7'f, //lCMtLre.. .f'-t.le, /.1Aul f?~L!It.fJ;b ~;Ii& ~ 7'U. 8M/lid.? Atk ;"o/oVconi/B/liel)~
fir i'tL. /le ;146~, ;,;"e. o/=1fe. CA.Pi~ -IcM{1~.$ ~ ~ .I#~I- /2$~mn;- .;-~
Are the following itemYapplicable to the project or its effects? Discuss betowal! items checked yes (attach additional ~
.ets as necessary),
YES NO
19,
20,
21.
22.
23.
24,
25,
26.
.
Change in existing features of any hills, or s.ubstantial alteratin of ground contours.
0 :&
0 ~
0 '~
0 fa
0 ~
0 S
0 ~
0 S
0 ,&
E.I.R.
04/12/00
Page 2
Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or publiclands or roads
Change in pattern, scale or character of general. area of project.
Significant amounts of solid. waste or litter.
Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity.
Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage pattersn.
Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity,
Is site on filled land or on any slopes oflO percent or,more,
Vseor disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances, flammable
or explosives,
1>
. Substantill;l change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water, sewage, etc.)
29. Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas, etc.
30. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects.
31. Storm water system discharges from areas for materials storage, vehicle or equipment
fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous
materials handling or storage delivery or loading docks, or other outdoor work areas?
32.
33,
34,
.
A significantly environmentally hannful increase in the flow rate or volume ofstonn water
runoff)
A significantly environmentally harmful increase in erosion of the project site or surrounding
areas?
Stonn water discharges that would significantly impair the beneficial uses of receiving waters
or areas that provide water quality benefits (e.g. riparian corridors, wetlands,etc.)?
Harm to the biological integriry of drainage systems and water bodies?
Environmental Settinl!
'""
. ~,...
ct'
YES NO
D S
;, ~
D
D l2t
D ~
D
~
~
o
D
~
o
~
36. Describe (on a separate sheet) the project site as it exists before the project, including information on
topography, soil stability, plants arid animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects, any existing structUres
on the site, and the use of the structures, Attach photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be
accepted. wjJMj-u..f J'7/l /;$ M /1.. W;:;/-s -Gejcme- ,If... tesl-aahfl.i?-I-:
37. Describe (on a separate sheet) the surrounding properties, including information on plants, animals, any cultural,
historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type ofland uses (residential, commercial, etc,), intensity of land use
(one-family, apanment houses, shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-
backs, rear yards, etc,). Attac'h photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted.
. /U /,vutIY /)'7l'x'd IU& blll~ ~td cnJ MfftWlhld
Certification ..
I hereby certifY that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the data and information required
for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the facts, statements, and information presented are true and
correct to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date
.
(4/(}~/cr1
Signa{L
)/
E,1.R.
04/12/00
Page 3