HomeMy WebLinkAbout1527
.
..
.
RESOLUTION 1527
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF
THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, GRANTING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 95-007 FOR AN
AUTOMOBILE REPAIR SHOP AT 119 W. LIVE OAK AVENUE.
WHEREAS, on August 21, 1995, a Conditional Use Permit application
was filed by Eddy Widjaja for an automobile repair shop in !l 1,925 sq. ft.
commercial building, Development Services Department Case No. CUP 95-
007, at property commonly known as II9 W. Live Oak Avenue, more
particularly described as follows:
Land described in doc. 0003274, in the City of Arcadia, County of Los
Angeles, State of California, Santa Anita Colony, portion of lot 68.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 26,1995, at which
time all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to
present evidence;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ARCADIA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the factual data submitted by the Development
Services Department in the attached report is true and correct.
SECTION 2. This Commission finds:
1. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not be
detrimental to the public health or welfare, or injurious to the property or
improvements in such zone or vicinity.
2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is properly one for
which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized.
3. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate said use, and all yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking, loading,
landscaping and other features required to adjust said use with the land and
uses in the neighborhood.
4. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and
pavement type to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use.
5. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not adversely
.
.
.
,
affect the comprehensive General Plan.
SECTION 3. That for the foregoing reasons this Commission grants a
Conditional Use Permit for an automobile repair shop in a 1,925 square foot
commercial building at 119 W. Live Oak Avenue upon the following
conditions:
1. All changes to the existing water system shall be provided to the
satisfaction of the Arcadia Water Division.
2. Provide a Knox Box per UFC 10.302. All fire protection shallbe
provided to the satisfaction of the Arcadia Fire Department.
3. Conditions as outlined by the Building Section shall be complied
with to the satisfaction of the Inspection Services Manager.
4. All work and vehicle inspections shall be conducted inside the
building.
5. The following. businesses shall be specifically prohibited: auto
painting spray booths, auto body work, auto dismantling, towing services,
auto sales, auto leasing and vehicle storage.
6. Outdoor storage of automobile parts, wares, merchandise, crates,
bottles and similar items be prohibited.
7. That CUP 95-007 shall not take effect until the owner and applicant
have executed an acceptance form, available at the Development Services
Department, indicating awareness and acceptance of ~he conditions of
approval.
8. Noncompliance with
Conditional Use Permit shall
the provisions and
constitute grounds
conditions of this
for its immediate
suspension or revocation.
SECTION 4. The decision, findings and conditions contained in this
Resolution reflect the Commission's action of September 26, 1995, and the
following vote:
AYES: Commissioner's Bell, Huang, Murphy, Sleeter, and
Daggett
Kalemkiarian
Kovacic
NOES:
ABSENT:
-2-
1526
.
.
.
SECTION 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution and shall cause a copy to be forwarded to the City Council of the
City of Arcadia.
I, HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a
regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 26th day of
September, 1995 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioner's Bell, Huang, Kalemkiarian, Murphy,
Sleeter, and Daggett.
None
Kovacic
NOES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Secretary, Plannin
City of Arcadia
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~~ If tJ1~~~
Mi ael H. Miller, City Attorney
-3-
1526
STAFF REPORT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
September 26,1995
SUBJECT:
Chairman and Members of the
Arcadia City Planning Commission
Donna L. Butler, Community Developme~t Administrator ~
By: John Halminski, Assistant Plannerp* ~
Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 95-007
II9 W. Live Oak Avenue
TO:
FROM:
SUMMARY
.
This Conditional Use Permit application was filed by Eddy Widjaja for a proposed
automotive repair shop at II9 W. Live Oak Avenue. The Development Services
Department is recommending approval of the requested Conditional Use Permit
subject to the conditions outlined in .this staff report.
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
Eddy Widjaja
LOCATION:
II9 W. Live Oak Avenue
REQUEST:
A conditional use permit to operate an automotive repair shop.
LOT AREA:
Approximately 15,839 square feet (0.34 acre)
FRONTAGE:
101.24 feet along Live Oak Avenue and 100 feet along Las Tunas
EXISTING LAND USE & ZONING:
The site is developed with a 7,806 sq. ft. industrial building and a parking lot
with 16 spaces; zoned CoM.
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION:.
The subject site is designated as Commercial.
.
.
.
.
SURROUNDING LAND USES & ZONING:
North:
South:
East:
West:
Mixed commercial; zoned C-2 & CoO.
Mixed commercial; zoned CoM.
Mixed commercial; zoned C-2 & CoM.
Mixed commercial and light industrial; zoned CoM & M-1.
PROPOSAL AND ANALYSIS
The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to operate an automotive repair
shop, as shown on the submitted floor plan. This business will occupy approximately
1,925 sq. ft. of the existing 7,806 sq. ft. building. Business hours would be from 8:00 a.m.
to 6:00 p.m., Monday thru Friday and 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. on Saturday.
Uses such as automotive repair establishments require conditional use permits,
including evaluation of the existing parking spaces situation. The existing 7,805 sq. ft.
building is currently divided into two spaces, 5,881 sq. ft. is occupied by a pasta
manufacturing plant and the remaining 1,925 sq. ft. is vacant. Based on the number of
required parking spaces of 2 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area, the proposed
automotive repair shop requires 4 spaces. The existing pasta manufacturing use
requires 6 spaces. A total of 16 on-site spaces are provided which satisfies the current
parking requirement.
Currently, the pasta manufacturing use employs four people and the proposed auto
repair shop will employ two people. Staff has randomly surveyed the site and has
determined that an average of 4 spaces are used on a regular basis by the pasta
manufacturing plant. With the addition of the proposed auto repair shop, two
additional spaces will be used by employees. A total of 10 spaces will be available for
normal business operations.
According to the applicant, a total of four cars will be on the site during any given day.
The interior of the shop is laid out to accommodate the storage and repair of four cars.
It is the owners' intent to only repair a total of four cars at one time.
A concern of the Community Development staff is parking and storage of customers'
vehicles in the designated on-site parking spaces. The applicants are proposing to park
customers' cars inside the building at all times. This restriction would limit the size of
the business and number of vehicles that could be worked on. All work will be
required to be done inside the building.
It is the Community Development staff's opinion that the business should not include
auto body painting or auto body work. These activities require vehicles to be stored on
the premises for longer periods of time, which could increase the necessity to use on-
site parking spaces for employees and patrons. A garage that does auto body painting
or auto body work should have a separate parking lot used exclusively for the storage
CUP 95-007
September 26, 1995
Page 2
'\
\
I
!
-
.
.
of vehicles. The subject site is not large enough to accommodate painting or body
work. Staff has no objection to general automotive repair on the site.
CEOA
Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning
Office has prepared an initial study for the proposed project. Said initial study did not
disclose any substantial or potentially substantial adverse change in any of the physical
conditions within the area affected by the project including land, air, water, minerals,
flora, fauna, ambient noise and objects of historical or aesthetic significance. When
considering the record as a whole, three is no evidence that the proposed project will
have any potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon
which the wildlife depends. Therefore, a Negative Declaration has been prepared for
this project.
RECOMMENDATIONS
The Development Services Department recommends approval of Conditional Use
Permit 95-007 subject to the following conditions:
1. All changes to the existing water system shall be provided to the satisfaction of
the Arcadia Water Division.
2. Provide a Knox Box per UF.C. 10.302. All fire protection shall be provided to
the satisfaction of the Arcadia Fire Department.
3. Conditions as outlined in the attached staff report from the Building Section
shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the Inspection Services Manager.
4. All work shall be conducted inside the building.
5. The following businesses shall be specifically prohibited: auto painting and
spray booths, auto body work, auto dismantling, towing services, auto sales,
auto leasing and vehicle storage.
6. Outdoor storage of automobile parts, wares, merchandise, crates, bottles and
similar items shall be prohibited.
7. That CUP 95-007 shall not take effect until the owner and applicant have
executed a form available at the Planning Section office, indicating awareness
and acceptance of the conditions of approval.
8. Noncompliance with the provisions and conditions of this Conditional Use
Permit shall constitute grounds for the immediate suspension or revocation
of said Permit.
CUP 95-007
September 26, 1995
Page 3
.
.
.
FINDINGS AND MOTIONS
Approval
If the Planning Commission intends to take action to approve this project, the
Commission should move to approve and file the Negative Declaration, find that the
project will not have a significant effect on the environment, and direct staff to
prepare the appropriate resolution incorporating the specific findings and conditions
of approval set forth in the staff report, or as modified by the Commission.
Denial
If the Planning Commission intends to take action to deny this project, the
Commission should move to deny and direct staff to prepare an appropriate
resolution incorporating the Commission's decision and findings in support of that
decision.
Note: Because there will not be an October 10, 1995 Planning Commission meeting,
resolutions of approval and denial have been prepared for adoption so that
there will not be an inordinate delay in the processing of this application.
Should the Planning Commission have any questions regarding this matter prior to
the scheduled public hearing, please contact John Halminski at your earliest
convenience.
Approved By:
Donna L. Butl
Community Development Administrator
Attachments:
Zoning and Land Use Map, site plan, elevations, and conditions of approval from the
Building, and Fire Department.
CUP 95-007
September 26,1995
Page 4
~~~.
r;' ~- ~
' .~
",~~.~
~I-' . .'
--, ." .....
->' ARCA~IA .
-: "iYJ rV' .
'''Co' ..:._~~\..~
.,~
Memorandum
-
DATE:
AUl!ust 21, 1995
TO:
( ) Building Sec.
( ) Econ. Dev. Div.
( 1 Engineering Div.
W. Fire Dept.
( ) Police Dept.
( ) Water Div.
()
FROM:
Plarming Sec.
~h,y"
SUBJECT: Application No. CUP 95-007
Address: Il9 W. Live Oak
~~ A conditional use permit for an auto reDair shoo.
Please review the attached proposal and comment on the following checked items and any other item(s) with
which your Dept./Div. may have concerns or special knowledge.
.
Please respond by: September 14, 1995
( ) Dedications
( ) Legal Description
( ) Traffic Circula tion
( ) Parkway Width(s)
( ) Street Lights
( ) Tentative Parcel/Tract Map Contents
( ) Final Map Contents
( ) Street trees & plants
( ) Is the subject property served by a sewer line that
is tributary to a deficient City trunk sewer line?
Location &: design of driveway & driveway apron
Encroaclunent into a special setback an:
( ) Water Services
( ) Irrigation System
( ) Backflow Devices
( ) Fire Hydrants
()Q Fire Safety
o<l.. Occupancy Limits
('4.. Public Safety & Security
( ) Handicap Accessibility
( ) Building Code Compliance
( ) Signs
( ) Consistency with Redevelopment
& Revitalization Plans
( ) Other:
( ) Grading &: Drainage
(>4.. Conditions of Approval
RJ:SiU'.5E V V" CHIl rl e. p., (('\ C::, ')<.. ~ ~..,( YE fL Ij . ~. C
\D . 30 7
· B~~~'~ ~
Dati!:
&/Lt[9~
,
1
~\'l'Y dj;h
. !~-'\
~I .J~~
--"" ARC~~[A . ".
'--::,'4iJ':J{iY.
'''''0 ~~..ay
"p~
Memorandum
-
DATE:
August 21, 1995
TO:
(X)Builcling Sec.
( ) Econ, Dev. Biv.
( ) Engineering Div.
( ) Fire Dept.
FROM:
PlanningSec.
SUBJECT: Application No. CUP 95-007
Address: 119 W. Live Oak
( ) Police Dept.
( ) Water Div.
( )
Prqe:t0'5cripti0n: A conditional use permit for an auto reoair shoT>.
Please review the attached proposal and comment on the foUowing checked items and any other item(s) with
which your Dept./Div. may have concerns or special knowledge.
,
~~\J4Ho~ ~~~ tl~ ~ ~ ~~ jJvt.
~~
~)~ ~J:;le~r ~7P~~.
. '#Z~~~NIJ1r-.~;7M-fh~
By. + ~ DaE {#-/ers-
.
~nspondby. September 14, 1995
( ) Dedications
( ) Legal Descriptian
( ) Traffic Circulation
( ) Parkway Width(s)
( ) Street Lights
( ) Tentative Parcel/Tract Map Contents
( ) Final Map Contents
( ) Street trees & plants
( ) Is the subject property served by a sewer line that
is tributary to a deficient City trunk sewer line?
( ) Location & design of driveway & driveway apron
( ) Encroachment into a special setback on:
( ) Grading & Drainage
()9.. Conditions of Approval
( ) Water Services
( ) Irrigation System
( ) Backflow Devices
( ) Fire Hydrants
( ) Fire Safety
( ) Occupancy Limits
( ) Public Safety & Security
() Handicap Accessibility
C>4 Building Code Compliance
( ) Signs
( ) Consistency with Redevelopment
& Revitalization Plans
( ) 0IheI:
.
.
T'(P, PAVEMENT
SYMBOL
.
WHEEL STOP 70 sa,lNCH
_ ~ ACCESSIBIUTYSIGN
~
:i
::;;
<;>
a,
!3H1IPESAT
36 ON CENTER
..L- ~
I ~ I
l~ 'OM" l
1/2 RAmUS
BLUE
WHITE
REfU:CTORIZEO SIGN
CONSTRUCTED or
PORCELAIN STEEL
WITH StAOED TEXT
OR EOUAL
1lQIf.; SIGN TO BE CENTEREO AT
THE INTERIOR END' or
P4RKING SPACE
AREA Of SIGN TO BE
A MIN. Of 70 SQ. IN.
DESIGNATE fOR
.VAN ACCESSIBLE"'
WHERE APPROPRIATE
G
RESERVED
FOR
HANDICAPPED
o
o
VAN ACCESSIBLE
_ .8'':)" :,lIN "T VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL
SO" WIN. fOR
rREE: STANDIN.
.36" MIN. fOR
WAll MOUNTE
TO TOP Of
WA,lKING SURfACE
67- 87- 07-
0 qO qO
. .8. 2 77, 1I~12
0 3'/ 3'2 0
<II
l"- t-'
- r'
- J /
-r
(/35./ P..?7;/ ('N.9/ r///../
~ 90 90 qO 90
LA90 TUNAS
147.71
~.3}!/
(/1!;)
( 13l1)
I 147.52 1:5;.2, I
I (124) (/20) I MI!. c"'l:tl
1 {It,,} "121 0 IXED I
: a.. 19 COMM ~I ~
: ~ ~a I C-M ~ a::
~: ~. N ~ ~' ~. ~
...1 ~Q \'1., . ::c
"'I ;-'O....J::; ~",...I
i~o~f' ~ .,' j
\..r c( ~O/.9J
I (/23) ~"'Ol,;!4
: ~25J t.l,.Js
.
LOT
...I
~
W
a:
Q
w
><
:E
CCI4~
{lJO "
5.5
\..1\JE.
DA.~
I~
6'2 10.04
90 -...
(;,0
I (/02.1
I
I
I Q
a:
IJ~
I~ ...-
...I
j!
Z
w
a:
...'"
-;M
<>0'
N
"'N
p J-\
(,;o/,)
1.34.44
/)1{.
d.OI (03'(;9
C8Zj 'it I
~ I.
- I
a:~PBr: I ~I
~
~L. S. q,. 8
..... 'I .
a: C. C. 8_
:J I
al I
14".90
/}.\J~'
....0 IS \
'f A~.~,1 ~~
~90/ ~ \
'30' ex: en \
o )roll
uJ tnl 0 ~\
~ ~@ "' 1 ~ ~
U1 \ \
S
u.r.".'I~
CITY
CITY
ARCADIA
Of E CITY
OF 362.11 TEft/PL
VACANT
MULTIPLE FAMilY
....
$
-
o
-.!l
\
\
\
I
'1(;".r.5
5 \...) ..
':\
.
AND USE AND ZONING
CUP 95-007 119 W.llVE OAK AVE
scale: 1- -100'
.
.
.
r
AI
-
,!E;.
<$lie. 1t-1,.~~,.,..:rli::W
. -lolTe. I_,a...,.
. tIJ'\AllI,.l1lt ,~..
. _......,uf 0-' .~~*
..~ 'll&&l
'''''''C n I MrN'"
._..r.I~~
......~..bfI....p.l;tfJ><IIII&D~~
::n.:=
---,...
-
FRONT WVATION
~--
. ~I
~.~-~
I
.
~\
-4
\
~
-+-
!
!,I!d'.....
"
j
~1-:"~-; r"l'-~:~ : :=-' '~"~f: -nn-; ':-! ., '=I~:"-
, , 'I' I
1 <--;--'--li;:'" ..r11~r .,,,.....
'I ,.: I I, ,I ! 1 ! I I I,
'.~l.
-f "" 1
II
~
I
1-'
I &
\
i
~;
.
.
r;,;;;,
L_
~
-,~ . .
..... _.-.... -..
~i~ ~ ~'~~~~J-'
~
~
~
~
~:
w,
_~f'Ioo,-',J",_
_...-...._~
1!bt.l.,.,tUt~__~
1"~
.... - -.-. -.----'--- .I!~T'_ "~T'" ......,..""
Tf (..-lEl
~""'~
=,-,we-iW::')
K"
0....
~.
<
liil
en I!! rl
25'.~
2h
It...
!.--- ,.... I J
..,..' L
/.'..+" . ...... .
,
SITE PLAN I ,.
__,,,"'.I'.J
0
.
CI'IY OF ARCADIA
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRNE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
File No.: CUP 95-007
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
A. Title and Description of Project:
Conditional Use Permit 95-007
A conditional use permit for an automotive repair shop.
B. Location of Project:
II9 W. Live Oak, Arcadia, CA 91007
C Name of Applicant or Sponsor:
.
Eddy Widjaja
D. Finding:
This project will have no significant effect upon the environment within the
meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 for the reasons set
forth in the attached Initial Study.
E. Mitigation measures, if any, included in the project to avoid potentially
significant effects:
.
Date:
Date Posted:
8/30/95
8/30/95
d~'
/ Assistant Planner
.
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. Project Title:
A conditional use permit for an auto repair shop.
2. Project Address:
119 W. Live Oak, Arcadia, CA 91007
3.
Project Sponsor's Name, Address and Telephone Number:
.
Eddy Widjaja
104 N. EI Molino
Alhambra, CA 91801
(818) 457-9447
4.
Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of Arcadia
240 W. Huntington Dr.
Arcadia, CA 91007
5. Contact Person and Phone Number:
John Halminski
(818) 574-5423
6. General Plan Designation:
Commercial
7.
.
Zone Classification:
CoM
File No. CUP 95-007
.
8. Description of Project: (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited
to later phases of the project and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for
its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
A conditional use permit to operate a proposed automotive repair shop.
9. Other public agencies whose approvaUs required. (e.g., permits, financing approval, or
participation agreement.)
Building Section, Fire Department and Maintenance Services.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the
checklist on the following pages.
-0 Land Use & Planning 0 Transportation/Circulation 0 Public Services
o Population & Housing 0 Biological Resources 0 Utilities & Service Systems
o Geological Problems 0 Energy & Mineral Resources 0 Aesthetics
o Water 0 Hazards 0 Cultural Resources
o Air Quality 0 Noise 0 Recreation
o Mandatory Findings of Signficance
.
E.I.R. Checklist
7/95
-2-
.
DETERMINATION
(To be rompleled by the Lead Agency.)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. ~
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A
NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. [J
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. [J
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the
environment, but at least one effect (I) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by
mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets,
if the effect is a "potentially significant impact" or "potentially significant unless
amitigated." mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAI.. IMPACT REPORT is required,
9but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. [J
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because
all potentially significant effects (a) have b~ analyzed adequately in an
earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or
mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures
that are imposed upon the proposed project. [J
{2/:. 1tL~A.' e/z.-e/fl-
Sj{nature Date
~ :.'->... t-t"'(......~ "l~k:';
Printed Name
UV P 9! - 0 0 "7
For
.
E.!.R. Checklist
7/95
-3-
. EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are
adequately supported by the informationsources a lead agency cites in the parentheses
following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the
referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects
like the one involved (e.g. the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact"
answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general
standards (e.g. the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a
project-specific screening analysis).
2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well
as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction
as well as operational impacts.
3. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropiriate if there is substantial evidence that an
effect is significant. If there are one or more "Potentially Significant Impact" en tires
when the determination is made, an EIR is required.
4.
"Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the
incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially
Significant Impact" to a "Less than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe
the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than
significant level (mitigation measures from Section XVII. "ealier Analyses." may be
cross-referenced.) .
.
5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR or other
CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative
declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). Earlier analyses are discussed in Section XVII at the
end of the checklist.
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information
sources for potential impacts (e.g. general plans, zoning ordinances). Refernce to a
previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a
reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
.
E.I.R. Checklist
7/95
-4-
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
SignUicant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
~
Woulclthe proposal result in potential
impacts involving:
1. LAND USE AND PLANNING.
Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation 0 0 0 c:r'
or zoning? (source #(s) )
b) Conflict with applicable environmental 0 0 0 Ia'"
plans or policies adopted by agencies
with jurisdiction over the project? (
c) Be compatible with existing land use in 0 0 0 ~
the vicinity? ( )
d) Affect agricultural resources or operations 0 0 0 [3""
(e.g. impacts to soils or farmlands, or
impacts from incompatible land uses?) (
. e) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement 0 0 0 ~
of an established community (including a
low-income or minority community)? ( )
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING.
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or 0 0 0 g'
local population projections? ( )
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either 0 0 0 [3"'"
directly or indirectly (e.g. through projects
in an undeveloped area or extension of
major infrastructure)? ( )
c) Displace existing housing, especially .0 0 0 ~
affordable housing? ( )
3. GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS.
Would the proposal result in or expose people to D D D ~
potential impacts involving:
a) Pault rupture? ( D 0 0 ~
. b) Seismic ground shaking? ( ) 0 0 0 ~
E.I.R Checklist
7/95
-5-
~
.
.
c) Seismic ground failure, including
liquefaction? ( )
d) Landslides or mudflows? ( )
e) Erosion, changes in topography or unstable
soil canditiortS from excavation, grading,
ar fill? ( )
f) Subsidence of the land? (
)
g) Expansive soils? ( )
h) Unique geologic or physical features? (
)
4. WATER
Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns
or the rate and amount of surface runoff? ( )
b) Exposure of people or property to water related
hazards such as flooding? ( )
c) Discharge into .surface waters or other alteration
of surface water quality (e.g. temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? ( )
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any
water body? ( )
e) Changes in currents, or the course or direction
of water mov<1Jl1en15? ( )
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either
through direct additions ar withdrawals, or
through interception of any aquifer by cuts
or excavations or thraugh substantial lass of
ground water recharge capability? ( )
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of
ground water? ( )
h) Impacts to ground water quality? (
Potentially
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
-6-
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
No
Impact
~
B"""
IJ'"
e----
g---
~
~
e--
if
~
8'"
Er
~
~
E.I.R. Checklist
7/95
Patentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
.
i) Substantial reduction in the amount of 0 0 0 ~
ground water otherwise available for
public waler supplies? ( )
5. AIR QUALITY.
Would Ule proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute 0 0 0 ~
to an existing or projected air quality
violation? ( )
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? ( ) 0 0 0 ~
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature 0 0 0 0---
or cause any change in climate? ( )
d) Create objectionable odors? ( ) 0 0 0 e---
6. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION
. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? ( 0 0 0 ~
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g. 0 0 0 ~
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g. farm equipment)? ( )
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to 0 0 0 Er"
nearby uses? ( )
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site ar 0 0 0 ~
off-site? ( )
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or 0 0 0 ~
bicyclists? ( )
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting 0 0 0 ~
alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)? ( )
g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? ( 0 0 0 ra--
.
E.I.R. Checklist
7/95
-7-
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less 111an
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
.
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
Would the proposal result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, threatened or rare species or their 0 0 0 ~
habitat.s (including but not limited to plants,
fish, insects, animals and birds)? ( )
b) Locally designated species (e.g. heritage 0 0 0 ~
trees)? ( )
c) Locally designated natural communities 0 0 0 ~
(e.g. oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? ( )
d) Wetland habitat (e.g. marsh, riparian and 0 0 0 EJ
vernal pool)? ( )
e) Wildlife dispersal or mitigation corridors? ( ) 0 0 0 ~
8, ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES
Would the proposal:
. a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation 0 0 0 8""
plants? ( )
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful 0 0 0 !2('
and inefficient manner? ( )
c) Result in the loss of availability of a known 0 0 0 ~
mineral resource that would be of future value
to the"region and the residents of the State? (
9. HAZARDS
Would the proposal involve:
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of 0 0 0 ~
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: oil, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? ( )
b) Possible interference with an emergency 0 0 0 g/
response plan or emergency evacuation plan? ( ~
c) The creation of any health hazard or 0 0 0
potential health hazard? ( )
.
E.I.R. Checklist
7/95
-8-
.
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of
potential health hazards? ( )
e) fncreased fire hazard in areas with flammable
brush, grass, or trees? ( )
10. NOISE
Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels? (
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? (
11. PUBLIC SERVICES
Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in
a need for new or altered government services in any
of the following areas:
a) Fire protectian? ( )
o b) Police protection? ( )
c) Schools? (
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads? ( )
e) Other governmental services? (
)
12. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
Would the proposal result in a need for new systems
or supplies, or substantial alterations to the
following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas? (
b) Communications systems? (
c) Local ar regional water treatment or
distribution facilities? ( )
d) Sewer or septic tanks? ( )
. e) Slonn water drainage? (
Potentially
Significant
. Impact
o
o
o
)
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
-9-
Potentially
Significant
Unless
Mitigation
Incorporated
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
No
Impact
Ia"
~
Er"
~
~
Er""
~
a
s--
l2f
er
~
(4""
cr-
E.I.R. Checklist
7/95
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
.
f) Solid waste disposal? ( 0 0 0 f.3'"
g) Local or regional water supplies? ( 0 0 0 B""
13. AESTHETICS
Would the proposal:
a) Affect a scenic vista or scenic highway? ( ) 0 0 0 !2(
b) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetics 0 0 0 I2r
effect? ( )
c) Create light or glare? ( ) 0 0 0 fa"
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES
Would the proposal:
a) Disturb paleontological resources? ( 0 0 0 e(
b) Disturb archaeological resources? ( ) 0 0 0 ~
0 c) Affect historical resources? ( ) 0 0 0 ~
d) Have the potential to cause a physical change 0 0 0 0"
which would affect unique ethnic cultural
values? ( )
e) Restrict existing religious or sacred uses 0 0 0 ~
within the potential impact area? ( )
15. RECREATION
Would the proposal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or 0 0 0 ~
regional parks or other recreational
facilities? ( )
b) Affect existingcrecreaiional opportunities? ( 0 0 0 [J/'
.
E.I.R. Checklist
7/95
-10-
Potentially
Significant
Potentially Unless Less Than
Significant Mitigation Significant No
Impact Incorporated Impact Impact
.
16. MANDA TORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade 0 0 0 g/
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the number
or restrict the range of a rare or endangered
plant or animal or eliminate important examples
of the major periods of California history or
prehistory? ( )
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve 0 0 0 cf
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals? ( )
c) Does the project have impacts that are 0 0 0 g/
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a
project are considerable when viewed in
. connection with the effects of past projects,
the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects).
d) Does the project have environmental effects 0 0 0 Ef"
which will cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, either d~t1y or indirectly?
.
E.I.R. Checklist
7/95
-11-
.
.
.
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1.
LAND USE PLANNING
a-e
The proposed Conditional Use Permit is a permit process establishing
specific conditions to allow automotive repair shops within a CoM zone or
any less restricitve commercial or industrial zone. The Conditional Use
Permit does not affect existing land uses or geraral plan designations.
2. POPULATION AND HOUSING
a-c
The proposed Conditional Use Permit is a permit process establishing
specific conditions to allow automotive repair shops within a CoM zone or
any less restricitve commercial or industrial zone. The.Conditional Use
Permit does not affect exisiting populations or housing.
3.
GEOLOGIC PROBLEMS
a-h
The proposed Conditional Use. Permit is a permit process establishing
specific conditions to allow automotive repair shops within a CoM zone or
any less restricitve commercial or industrial zone. The proposed
Conditional Use Permit will not expose people to any geologic or seismic
problems.
4.
WATER
a-i
The proposed Conditional Use Permit is a permit process establishing
specific conditions to allow automotive repair shops within a CoM zone or
any less restricitve commercial or industrial zone. Any Conditional Use
Permit proposed as a result of this enabling legislation woulQ have to
comply with all City~s standards and subject to review by all agencies.
5.
AIR QUALITY
a-d
The proposed Conditional Use Permit is a permit process establishing
specific conditions to allow automotive repair shops within a CoM zone or
any less restridtve commercial or industrial zone. Any Conditional Use
Permit proposed as a result of this enabling legislation would have to
comply with all City's standards and subject to review by the appropriate
agencies.
CUP 95-0071
.
.
.
6.
TRANSPORT A TlON/CIRCULA TlON
a-g
The proposed Conditional Use Permit is a permit process establishing
specific conditions to allow automotive repair shops within a CoM zone or
any less restricitve commercial or industrial zone. Any Conditional Use
Permit proposed as a result of this enabling legislation would have to
comply with all City's standards and subject to review by the appropriate
agencies.
7. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
a-c
The proposed Conditional Use Permit is a permit process establishing
specific conditions to allow automotive repair shops within a CoM zone or
any less restricitve commercial or industrial zone. Any Conditional Use
Permit proposed as a result of this enabling legislation would have to
comply with all City's standards and subject to review by the appropriate
agencies.
8.
ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES
a-c
The proposed Conditional Use Permit is. a permit process establishing
specific conditions to allow automotive repair shops within a CoM zone or
any less restricitve commercial or industrial zone. Any Conditional Use
Permit proposed as a result of this enabling legislation would have to
comply with all City~s standards and subject to review by the appropriate
agencies.
9.
HAZARDS
a-e
The proposed Conditional Use Permit is a permit process establishing
specific conditions to allow automotive repair shops within a CoM zone or
any less restricitve commercial or industrial zone. Any Conditional Use
Permit proposed as a result of this enabling legislation would have to
comply with all City's standards and subject to review by the appropriate
agencies.
10.
NOISE
a and b
The proposed Conditional Use Permit is a permit process establi shing
specific conditions to allow automotive repair shops within a CoM zone or
any less restricitve commercial or industrial zone. Any Conditional Use
CUP 95-0072
.
.
.
11.
12
13.
Permit proposed as a result of this enabling legislation would have to
comply with all City's standards and subject to review by the appropriate
agencies.
PUBLIC SERVICES
a-e
The proposed Conditional Use Permit is a permit process establishing
specific conditions to allow automotive repair shops within a CoM zone or
any less restricitve commercial or industrial zone. Any Conditional Use
Permit proposed as a result of this enabling legislation would have to
comply with all City's standards and subject to review by the appropriate
agencies.
UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
a-g
The proposed Conditional Use Permit is a permit process establishing
specific conditions to allow automotive repair shops within a CoM zone or
any less restricitve commercial or industrial zone. Any Conditional Use
Permit proposed as a result of this enabling legislation would have to
comply with all City's.standards and subject to review by the appropriate
agencies.
AESTHETICS
a-c
The proposed Conditional Use Permit is a permit process establishing
specific conditions to allow automotive repair shops within a CoM zone or
any less restricitve commercial or industrial zone. Any Conditional Use
Permit proposed as a result of this enabling legislation would have to
comply with all City's standards and subject to review by the appropriate
agencies.
14. CULTURAL RESOURCES
a-e
The proposed Conditional Use Permit is a permit process establishing
specific conditions to allow automotive repair shops within a CoM zone or
any less restricitve commercial or industrial zone. Any Conditional Use
Permit proposed as a result of this enabling legislation would have to
comply with all City's standards and subject to review by the appropriate
agencies.
CUP 95-0073
.
.
.
15.
RECREATION
a-b
The proposed Conditional Use Permit is a permit process establishing
specific conditions to allow automotive repair shops within a CoM zone or
any less restricitve commercial or industrial zone. Any Conditional Use
Permit proposed as a result of this enabling legislation would have to
comply with all City's,standards and subject to review by the appropriate
agencies.
16. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a-d
The proposed Conditional Use Permit in and of itself will not have any
impact on the environment.
CUP 95-0074
. .
.
FileNo. l'.\J17. 'l~-o.,"
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
Date Filed:
General Information
1. APPlicant'sName:~ ~\~tA<\" -
Address: ~ ~. E 1 "\YID~iM ,IJ.., T
2. Property Address (Location): jL~ 'i) ). hll,
Assessor's Number:
.
~~ ~1l\\\Q'\R" I f Ul~O \
I'lr.\.~( I ~RelM\',^ I eU11I\:l to
3.
Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project:
t.\~", \\.~~/\ \ol-L1\.._J;~Ot,^il ~1 ~~~~....tRIA I e..U,,~a \
. \
L~\t\\ ^\~"'\
4.
List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals'required for this
project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies:
t'1>""J..~./...\6_ U....<l. "?tt.< __~ +
5.
6.
Zone Classification: L - ~
General Plan Designation: r (l lVI",Q\- ~ : ~,
Project Description
7.
Proposed use of site (project description): AvJ... F~ p........r
8.
9.
Site size: A"Di'bll"'......-kl" ILI.800 .I:.
TT , I F
Square footage per building: i lln!o., ~ t
10. Number of floors of construction: ~/A
.11. Amount of off-street parking provided: I ~
... .
12,
13,
-14.
IS.
16.
17.
.
Proposed scheduling of project: tJ /~
Anticipated incremental development: \oJ,h.
If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or
rents, and type of household sizes expected:
~l~
If commercial, indicate the type, i.e. neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square
footage of sales area, and loading facilities, hours of operation:
'1M)~ -\.,\"'~ ~'.~ - (..,'.lVO
4~.. J-13 ~~ t\
If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities:
h) )tr
If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated
occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project:
'.'l).tt
18. If the project involves a variance, conditional use permit or zoning application, state
this and indicate clearly why the application is required:
il~ OR~<<^~ .l~ ~~U\k"O' (l)- fO.....\/~'lJ) .>v ~].~.......\.\. ~~ ~
t l:I\ .:;tou.
Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items checked
yes (attach additional sheets as necessary).
19.
20.
21.
.
Change in existing features of any hills, or substantial alteratin of ground
contours.
YES NO
0 []-'
0 13-
0 La-
E.I.R.
3/95
Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public
lands or roads.
Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project.
.2-
.
~f~ Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
23. Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity.
24. Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing
drainage patterns.
25. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity.
26. Is site on filled land or on any slopes of 10 percent or more.
27. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances,
flammable or explosives.
28. Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.).
29. Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas,
etc.).
YES NO
0 ~
0 a
0 ey/
0 ~
0 ~
0 ~
0 a
0 Ei
0 Gi
30. Relationship to a larger project or series of projects.
/"~'~ironmentaI Setting
-~
31. Describe (on a separate sheet) the project site as it exists before the project, including
information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, any cultural, historical or
scenic aspects, any existing structures on the site, and the use of the structures. Attach
photographs of the site. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be accepted.
Describe (on a separate sheet) the surrounding properties, including information on
plants, animals, any Cliltural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land uses
(residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses,
shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-backs,
rear yards, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will
be accepted.
ereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the
a and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the
s, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the b st of my knowledge
belief.
("
Signature
-3-
EJ.R.
3/95