Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1422
.
.
e
e
RESOLUTION 1422
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ARCADIA, CAUFORNIA GRANTING
CONDmONAL USE PERMIT 89-015 TO CONSTRUCT A 9,200
SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT WITH PARKING MODIFICA-
TIONS AT 430 EAST HUNTINGTON DRIVE (ARCADIA
GATEWAY CENTRE) AND AMENDING RESOLUTION 1397
TO ALLOW ONLY TWO EATING ESTABLISHMENTS WITH A
MAXIMUM SEATING FOR 12 PERSONS EACH IN THE
RETAIL BUILDING AT 300 EAST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
WHEREAS, on September 1, 1989 an application was filed by Arcadia Gateway
Centre Associates, to construct a 9,200 square foot restaurant, Planning Department
Case No. C.U.P. 89-015 at 430 East Huntington Drive, more particularly described in
attached Exhibit A.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on September 26, 1989, at which time
all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present
evidence;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the factual data submitted by the Planning Department in the
attached report is true and correct.
Section 2. This Commission finds:
1. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental
to the public health or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in
such zone or vicinity.
2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is a proper use for which a
Conditional Use Permit is authorized.
3. That although there is concern regarding the total number of parking
spaces and their location, and the actual parking demands which will be generated
by the eventual uses, it was felt that the proposed restaurant would be an acceptable
addition to the project provided that any parking problems which may arise, will be
mitigated as per the conditions set forth below.
4. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and pavement
type to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use.
5. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect
the comprehensive General Plan.
-1-
1422
.
.
e
e
6. That the use applied for will not have a substantial adverse impact on the
environment.
Section 3. That for the foregoing reasons this Commission approves a
Conditional Use Permit to construct a 9,200 sq. ft. restaurant upon the following
conditions:
1. Thatthe gross floor area of the restaurant shall not exceed 9,200 sq. ft.
2. That the 7,208 sq. ft. of office uses which are proposed to be located within
the retail building (300 East Huntington Drive), shall not be converted at a later
date to retail or other uses which have a greater parking requirement.
3. That Resolution No. 1397, approving Conditional Use Permit 88-028, is
amended to allow a lYlR"';lYlUD1 of two eating establishments located within the
retail building (300 East Huntington Drive), and that the seating within each
establishment shall not exceed 12 persons.
4. That the architectural design review of the proposed restaurant shall be
subject to the review and approval of the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency.
5. That a 5% parking space vacancy requirement shall be maintained
within the area north of the office buildings, retail building and/or within 200 feet
of the restaurant pads (see attached map), on weekdays between the time the
restaurant approved by this conditional use permit is opened and 4 p.m.
The Planning Department shall make periodic surveys to determine if the
5% vacancy rate is maintained. !fit is determined by the P]Rnn;ng Department
that the 5% vacancy rate is not maintained, the Planning Department shall notify
the property owner(s). The property owner(s) shall be required to:
a. Implement parking management techniques which will bring the
vacancy rate back to at least 5%, within 15 days of the receipt of said notice; and
b. File a written report with the Planning Department setting forth the
specific parking management techniques which will be implemented within 15
days of the receipt of said notice.
6. That 4,000 square feet of net leasable floor area within the four story
office building (440 East Huntington Drive), shall not be leased or rented until
approval is secured from the Planning Department following the preparation of a
parking study (submitted by the property owner) which demonstrates that the
occupancy of said building area will not result in traffic and/or parking
deficiencies.
-2-
1422
1
,
t
.
-
,
building (440 East Huntington Drive) and of the retail building (300 East
Huntington Drive) are occupied.
7. That c.u.P. 89-015 shall not take effect until the owner and applicant have
executed a form available at the Planning Department indicating awareness and
acceptance of the conditions of approval.
8. Noncompliance with the provisions and conditions of this Conditional
Use permit shall constitute grounds for the immediate suspension or revocation of
said Permit.
Section 4. The decision, findings and conditions contained in this Resolution
reflect the Commission's action of August 8,1989 and the following vote:
A YES: Commissioners Amato, Oark, Szany
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Commissioner Hedlund
ABSENT: Commissioner Papay
Section S. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and
shall cause a copy to be forwarded to the City Council of the City of Arcadia.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular
meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 10th day of October, 1989 by the
following vote: .
AYES: -\-\ 'CODllllissior.>ers Amato, Hedlund, Szany, Clark
NOES: :-'; None
_",i=.' e.,., ~~
anning Commission
City of Arcadia
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
ItJfJ)AUultuhAd
Secretary, Planning Commission
City of Arcadia
,
-3-
1422
.
.
.
e
Sept~mMr 26, 1989
ARCADIA CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
DONNA L. BUTLER, SENIOR PLANNER
CASE NO.: C.U.P.89-015
TO:
FROM:
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT:
LOCATION:
Arcadia Gateway Centre Associates, Ltd.
430 East Huntington Drive - South side ofHuntmgton
Drive between Second Avenue and Fifth Avenue
(Arcadia Gateway Centre)
Conditional use permit to construct ~ operate a 9,200
sq. ft. restaurant and related parking modifications.
9.U'acres
874 feet on Huntington Drive
REQUEST:
LOT AREA:
FRONTAGE:
EXISTING LAND USE & ZONING
The site is currently developed with a medical office building
(CIGNA), a restaurant (Bennigan's), a retail building (CODt-8in;'lg 2
eating establishments - Salsa Del Rio and Smooch's), a three story
office building (Automobile Club) and a four story office building
(under construction). The site is zoned CPD-l.
SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING
North:
Developed with the Embassy Suites Hotel, the Derby
Restaurant, the Souplantation Restaurant and vacant
property (formerly an automobile dealership); zoned
CPOol
Developed with the AT & SF Railroad
Developed with the California State Bank, and a
mini-storage facility and a mobile home park which are
located within the City of Monrovia.
Developed with the AT & SF Railroad
Sou.th:
E~t:
West:
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION
. Planned Development - 1
. BACKGROUNQ
In July, 1988 the City Council approved Modification MM 88-005 to allow 821
parking spaces (4,61 parking spaces per 1,000 sq. a. of gross floor area) in
lieu of 908 parking spaces (5.09 spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross floor area)
required.
On December 13, 1988 the PJAnni"g Commission adopted Resolution 1397
granting Conditional Use Permit 88-028 to operate three eating
establishments within the 26,979 sq. ft. retail center. This was approved
subject to the conditions that the combined floor area of the three eating
establishments not exceed 6,000 square feet with a QlAYimum seating for 12
persons in each establishment. At this time there are only two eating
establishments operating in the retail center.
PROPOSAL AND ANALYSIS
The total square footage allocated for the two restaurants, which were part
of the consideration of the approved parking modification in July, 1988, was
13,357 sq. ft. The Bennigan's restaurant contains 7,357 sq. ft. thereby
allowing 6,000 sq. ft. for the second restaurant.
. The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to construct a second
restaurant containing 9,200 sq. ft. east of the Bennigan's Restaurant. The
proposed restaurant will be open for lunch and dinner and have seating for
280 persons.
Based on the previously approved modification (MM 88-005), a total of 821
parking spaces are permitted. in lieu of 908 required by Code (which is the
total of the required parking for each of the separate uses). The
modification was granted because it was shown in a traffic engineer's
(Barton-AschmAn) report that the proposed mixed uses on the site would
have a peak parking demAnd of 733 spaces. .
Information submitted by the applicant as a part of this application, notes
that 7,208 square feet of space within the retail building is now going to be
occupied by office uses. This chAnge in use results in a seven space
decrease in the number of Code required parking spaces (908.7 = 901),
notwithstanding the present proposal.
The appliknt has made some minor modifications to the site plan and has
been able to provide six additional parking spaces over what was shown on
the plan approved by the prior modification (821 + 6 = 827).
e
.
.
.
e
The proposed restaurant is 3,200 square feet larger than the restaurant
which was considered at the time the prior modification was granted. This
additional square footage requires a thirty two space increase in the
number of Code required parking spaces (901 + 32 = 933).
The changes in required parking for the retail to office uses (+7) plus the
additional parking spaces (+6), less the additional parking required for the
restaurant (-32) amounts to a request for an additional reduction of 19
parking spaces from the number of spaces required by Code (request for 827
parking spaces in lieu of 933 required by Code).
Barton-Aschman Associates, Inc. (traffic engineers) has provided a report
which notes that the peak parking demand for the proposed project is
estimated to occur at 2:00 PM and generate a demand for a total of 812
parking spaces, (827 parking spaces are proposed in the current plan).
Staff has concerns with the total number of parking spaces and their
location, and the actual parking demands which will be generated by the
eventual uses (businesses, offices, retail, etc.) on the site.
Because the spec office building and the AAA building are still under
construction, and a significant portion of the retail building is not yet
occupied, the total parking demand can only be estimated. H these
buildings were completed and occupied, we would be better able to assess
the impact of a further reduction of nine parking spaces.
Staff is concerned that when parking approaches the peak demand, the
spaces which are located within the parking structure will not be fully
utilized, and that there may be a substantial shortage of parking within the
area of the restaurants and the retail building.
There are approximately 381.surface parking spaces which are located
north of the spec office building, the AAA building and the retail building
and/or which are located within 200 feet of the proposed restaurant pad (see
Exhibit A). Staff believes that there should beat least 5% vacant parking
spaces, at all times, within this area to facilitate the turnover of spaces and
for customers of the retail, office, and restaurant uses. Customers of these
uses should not to be.forced to park in remote locations such as near the
Cigna building or within the parking structure. H there are not sufficient
vacant spaces, drivers looking for spaces will create on site congestion
which could affect overall vehicular circulation within the aisles near the
restaurants, retail and office buildings and within the driveways to and
from the ~king strocture and Cigna building. A 5% vacancy within the
described.area would result in 19 open spaces.
The proposed design of the building has not been finalized. H this
application is approved the applicant will be required to submit the
architectural design plans to the Redevelopment Agency for architectural
design review.
.
.
Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the
Planning Department has prepared an initial study for the proposed project.
Said initial study did not disclose any substantial or potentially substantial
adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by
the project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise
and objects of historical. or aesthetic significance. Therefore, a Negative
Declaration has been prepared for this project.
RECOMMENDAl1PN
The plAnning Department believes that the proposed restaurant would be
an acceptable additiOn to the project, provided that parking problems,
which may arise, will be mitigated. Without mitigation measures, this
application should not be approved.
The Planning Department recommends approval of C.U.P. 89-015 to allow a
9,200 sq. ft. restaurant subject to the following conditions.
1. That the gross floor area of the restaurant shall not exceed 9,200 sq.
ft.
e
2. That the 7,208 sq. ft. of office uses which are proposed to be located
within the retail building, not be converted at a later date to retail or
other uses which have a greater parking requirement.
3. That the third eating establishment proposed to be located within the
retail building (approved by Conditional Use Permit 88-028), not be
developed.
4. That the architectural design review of the proposed restaurant shall
be subject to the review and approval of the Arcadia Redevelopment
Agency. .
5. That a 5% parking space vacancy requirement sbal1 be maintained
within the area north of the office buildings, retail building and/or
within 200 feet of the restaurant pads, on weekdays between the
hours of the opening of the restaurant approved by this conditional
use permit and 4 PM.
The plAnning Department shall make periodic surveys to determine
iftRe 5% vacancy rate is maintained. Hit is determined by the
plAnning Department that the 5% vacancy rate is not maintained,
the-PlAnning Department sbal1 notify the property owner and the
restaurant operator. The property owner sbal1 be required to both
implement parking mAnAgement techniques which will bring the
vacancy rate back to at least 5%, within 15 days of the receipt of such
notice and file a written report with the PlAnning Department
e
.
.
e
e
setting forth the specific parking management techniques which will
be implemented.
If the property owner fails to take corrective action or fails to
maintain the 5% vacancy rate, the p]Ann;ng Department shall
initiate proceedings for the consideration of imposing other
conditions of approval. These conditions could include but may not be
limited to revoking the conditional use permit or restricting the
hours of the restaurant operation, or such other conditions as the
P]ann;ng Commission deems appropriate.
6. That c.u.P. 89-015 shall not take effect until the owner and applicant
have executed a form available at the Planning Department indicating
awareness and acceptance of the conditions of approval.
7. Noncompliance with the provisions and conditions of this
Conditional Use permit shall constitute grounds for the immediate
suspension or revocation of said Permit.
FINDINGS AND MOTIONS
Approval
If the Planning Commission intends to take action to approve this project, the
Commission should move to approve and file the Negative Declaration and
find that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment and
direct staff to prepare the appropriate resolution incorporating the specific
findings and conditions of approval set forth in the staff report (or as
modified by the Commission).
Denial
If the Planning Commission intends to take action to deny this project, the
Commission should move to deny and direct staff to prepare an appropriate
resolution incorporating the Commission's decision and findings in support
of that decision.
,
,
.
.
\}l\fl~
~ ~~
~t~
~~~
~~z
.~ ~ ~
~. l~
- ~
~~
l~
~~
~
=I
l>-
I
,
!l
j
)
HlNTINGTDN DRIVE
ARCADIA GATEWAY CENTRE
SWQ ASSOCIATES
..
--
__ow:._
--
--
sv_
-
-
-...
-...
-----
__u._u._
--
--
--
--
..-.....
-..
-...
-...
-
......,. ....u._
---
--
,-.....
--
_U.
--
,-..
-
_U. -.-u,_
_II. .......,_
---
--
,..u, ..-11,'_
_B_
.... .....1' ,....,
.'.-'1', ........,
1CIf____U.
--
--
6UUiIIILI
--
,.. n
......
..... -
-g-
--
-g-
---
..-
.-.-....,
-
-.......'".'"
-< ...')
~~
srrE PU.N E8
- ~'-'k
- _._ :::-#'F~
-...- "'..,.~...
-..- ....-:....
-.-
__M_
---
.nv~.,..,..
.
.
-
e
Barton.Aschman Associates. Inc.
~
75 North Fair Oaks Avenue
Pasadena. California 91109-1C90
USA
Phone: (818) ~4!?-:):ol ~
Telex: 675336
Fax: (818) 440.80.;0
MEMORANDUM
F<i~CE!V~~rl
SEP l! 1~89
erN OF' I,RC.\Vl"
pl.J'r~Nl~ o\::"'"
'IO: George Grossoo
stanley W. Gribble. & A..c;.<;ociates
F"Ra'!: Neal K. Liddicoat
D!\TE: September 11, 1989
RF.: MODIA GM'EIfAY ~ - >>lALYSIS OF ~ D!X>>lD
'll1e Arcadia Gat:e',.ray centrP. iR a 1lIiJcEr:i-use develOpDent locata3 on the south
side of Huntin]t:on Drive between ~nd Avenue and Fifth AVP./'lIle iI'l Al"'C'adia.
Tbrtions of the project have already been c.anpleted, i.ncludi.rq a llP..nnig1U1'R
restaurant, a CIGNA Healthplan merllcal office buildirq, ard II !lIMlJ. n!ta.i.1
buildin:J. ~ office buUd.in;Js are currently under cailStrUCtion, irx:lltdir"J
one interrled to boose the reqiana1. headquarters of the Automobile Cl\lh of
5outhe.rn california. 1.easirq activity Lc; currently urde.rway for the retail
suites and neqct:iations are progressin;} for a $E!OCltl:i restaurant tenant.
'n1e mixEd-use natun. of the /u"'c1!dta Gateway centre IIBkes it a prilTc
cardidate for inplementation of a shared paOcirq program. t1rder such a
program, the parki.n;r supply .is adjusted to reflect the fact that differP.l1t
larrl uses have peak parId.n:J demanis that 00CU1" at variQlS times of the day.
For elCaI1ple, 1o'hile office buildings have their highest pa.rIdng dP.JTMd c1Ul:'il~
the midday period (typically at a~roximately ],1:00 AM), restaurants peak in
the evening. Shared parJdnrJ also r.ef.lect.."l the interncti.on that ocoU'S
between the various u..es.
Previous parJd.n] analyses have dellPnStrated that the parking derrarxl at the
center will be signifir.antly lCMP.r than the the city of Arcadia Pr-lr.k.ilYl
Regulations ~ typically require. In particular, in JUlle of 1988 an
aJ'lal.ysis was prepared that result.ai 1.n llIll:r:'CM'll. of an overall parking ratto
of 4.60 parJdnq spaces per 1,000 square feet for. the project. In
O'Jl1tl8r.ison, the city recp1.rement called for prolliRion at " ratio of !>.09
spaces pp..r 1,000 square fMt.. a total of 908 spaces.
, .
,
Since that 1:eduQed parking ratio was awnMld, several miJ1m: ~ pave
ocx:urred relative to the project's land use plan. A potential ttlStaurant
tenant has been identified that wculd r.esult in a slight IncreaSii! in t.tw.
1
(6J
. Barton-Aschman Associates. Inc"
.
.
totnl annxnt of restaurnnt sp;iC'P. em site. l\t.. the same tiJ1le, hoiIever, l~
have been signed with a pair of office-type tenants to be lcxated in t.he
retail wildinJ. Specifically, COldwell BankPr RPsident.i.al 'Re<ll Estate NI!<
agreed to lease a 5,276 square foot space at the east em of the LataH
roildirq. Also, Pennysaver has signed a lease for 1,932 square fed: to lX'
used for sales of advertising space, Neither of thP..se t',yo tenants i!>
expected to have the saIlI! parJdnq dernarrl cMmc:teTi.Rtics fourd at a typical
retail shop. Instead, they are expected to IlUCh more closely reserrhl.-:
office uses, both in terns of the llI.IIl1l':l"'-r of parldn:J spa~ required ")'ll'l tho,!
peak demand times. For that reason, this analysis will treat the O:>lclliell
Banker and F.ennysavP.T 5paQP.$ as office U$E!S.
.
Table 1 sunmarizes the land use ,..''''"y,oul.ants a.J.l'l:~nt.ly pt'(>posed for iT.::l~lon
in the Arcadia Gateway Centre.
S'l'tlDY PURPOSE AND ~
e
'!be ~ of this \I'eIIOxarwn repoyt. is to docunenl:. t.he ~'U1\:s oJ: an
updated parId.ng demilrd analysLc; for the Arr.:1ldt3 t">3tA1ay Crnlt.1:'P-. The
metnodology is essentially si1llilar to the pI"Oaldut'e used in the previously
submitted analy.;.F.'S. Gel'lE'.rally, the met.hc.xlology is based upon a set of
proeedurll!s established in thA 1lr.bm land TMti.t1.lte'B robUC".ation, :::l'larR]
~. 'l11at plbl1cation, which desr.:ribes the r.esult.s of. a high1y'"<iE!t.aHw
analysis of parkirq deInarxi in mixed-\lllC dcvclc:pl1('lIts. was CXIlliIlct.:x.J. by
Bartcm-.l\schmiU1 in 1983.
SIflUlB) PJW<n<<; OEFDI!'1'!otI
As presented in the tJLI J:~L t I shared parldng is defined as "varlUn~ f1Pi:I.Ct?
that can be used to sezve two or lIDrEl inJividual lan:l-uses withWt conflict
or encroachment. n Further,.the opportunity to hTplE!llellt shared parJtirq is
the result of two cond.itiOM:
1. Variations in tlle peak aoc:unulation of parked vehicles due t-.o t.irof,
diffel~ in the activity pat.t.erns of adjilC'lP.l"lt: or M'UT'Y 1.al'l()-
uses (for f!lllIIItIle, patrons of u!",P.9 that peaIc in the eve.n.i.n:.J. stlch
as restaurants, can use parJdng spaces providEd priInari.1y for
daytime uses, sudl as office wildfNJs).
2. Relati.anships aIllOI'II] land-use activities that result in people
beinq att.ract:ed to two or more land-uses on a single auto trip
(for exauple, office E!llPloyaes We 5hql at nearl:1t t'etail Illtores ()t"
who eat in nearby restallrants) .
e 2
BartongAKhman A.soclatel, I"(t,
.
.
TAB1Jl 1
I.\HD-OSE stIJOOIRy
ARCIU):m GM'EWAY C!:Nl'R!
~USE;.. SIZE
CIGNA Medical Office BUildi!'q 47,296 Sq. Ft.
Four-Story Office E\li.lc.lU"J 66,834 sq. Ft.
1lAA Office IlUi.ldirq 23,632 Sq. Ft.
OffiCE;! (Retail Buildi.ng) 7,208 Sq, Ft.
Retail Shops 19,771 Sq. l''t.
e Benn1gan's Restaurdllt 7,357 Sq. Ft.
Propo.;ed RestaIlMlrlt 9,20CL,Sg, :f't. ....-
'rarAL 181,298 Sq. Ft.
".
'to
e
3
.
.
e
e
Barton.Aschm81n Assocl~.l!'s, ,"(:,
PARJCIJI; AtW.YSI8
Usi1g the previously-approved par1d.nJ .t'<lt.io of 4.60 spilce; per 1,000 squun~
feet, the project (181,29S square feet) would be l"equi..rl!d to pro'll&! CI total
of 834 spaces. Hooever, the shared parJ<..i.n:;J analysis has been reviSl.ld t'J
reflect the nnHfireatl.<:>Tl9 to tM developl!!P..nt pro.Jl:dm desr.:r:ibed above.
As 1lI!l'\tioned earlier, the scme par'<\II'eters ani assunptions used in the
previously-approved sham parking analyses have been E!Ilployed .in this
analysis. L"l partiClllar, the followiIg llsSt..ion-'l haV'e' been enployed:
1. 'l1'te parking demard ratios are those specified in the city of
Arcadia ParltiJ'IcJ Regulations, except for Saturday office parkit13,
10tUcn is assumed to be equivalent to only 0.5 spaces per 1,000
square feet, as stated in the ULI Shand Parld.rg report.
2. '!he captive market assurrptions (Le., the proportion of retail or
restaurant patrons who will already be on-site (office E!Slployees,
for example), for whOlll it is not necessary to provide an
adiitional parkin:J space) are as follOW!'!:
o
Retail-l0 percent
o Restaurant-20 percent.
3. No adjustment has been applied to Lqll: r.-ent transit usage by
proje..."t ellP10yees or patrons, even tJ1cugIl the project is loc:atP.d
an several Southern california Rapid Transit Di$trict liJe;.
4. '!he analysis has ".....17N>d that each of the Wividual l~ i.;
constantly qlenting at its ~~'CUVlal peak (j .e., no adj~1Stment
factors have been awlied to reflect the fact that activity levels
at retail an:) restaurant facilities vary significantly throuc:Jhout
the year) .
Table 2 S1-,.izes tJ1e ir1put parameters ESlI'loyed in this analysis while the
hourly partdnIJ demmi results are Sl.II1UIIarized on Table 3. As shown, the
maxlllUll partdnq demand is estiInated to 0C'C'l.Ir at 2:00 m. At that tillie, the
Arcadia Gateway Cetl~", is estimated to generate dem:In:l for 812 parkin3
spaces. Relat!nq this estilnat.e to thf! total '!lql.lare. footaqe of the PL'Oject
indicates en overall parkin;J ratio of 4.48 sp:>oes pet' 1,000 squan'l fElCt.
Note that CJrrent plans call for proviciin:J a total of 828 paricirg spaces, an
OI/erall ra1;io of 4.51 spaces per 1,000 5qlare feet. In other words, though
the p..''looed parkinq S\JAlly will be slightly less than the previously-
awroved ratio of 4.60 spaces per 1,000 square feet, surplus spaces will
still bP. lWailllble.
4
.
.
e
~
BartGngAschms" A8$(t~I~t.lJo, lnG,
TABLE 2
EDmRED ~ INPUt' JS8t1MPl'IONS
~IA GM'EWAy C!:If1'RE
- --_...._-=.'.'=-~='~c:at:=....:#~~.&:\....I.&::"..__D...e....,.~~"'i._'",\..r~~~ -':r~Q=Q_a"'-OD~ ~..:;:;
I..AIID USES SIZES Ill{ RATtO SAT RATIO , AIl'1'O "US/AUTO , CAPrIVE MON'!'ll AllJ
------------------------------------------------------------_..._----_.._~.....__.., ,. - .
OFFICE 145 4.59 0.50 100 1.20 HIA 1.00
RETAIL 20 5.00 5,00 100 1.80 10 1.00
RIlSTAllJW<'!' 17 10.00 10.00 100 2.00 20 1,00
CIIlEJlA 0 0.25 0.30 100 2.00 0 1.00
CBD-RESIO 0 1.00 1.00 H/A ilIA HIA 1.00
HCBD-RES HI 0 1.00 1.00 II/A ilIA H/A 1.00
HOTEL-R/l 0 1.00 1.00 80 1.40 II/A l,oe
HTL-CONf 0 0.50 0.50 100 2.00 0 1.00
II'J'L-CONV 0 30.00 30.00 100 '2.00 0 1.00
---------... . ---------._--~-~ ,~ ..,. .. --- .......-......... ~-- ---.......---.... "'--.--- -----....---..... --
,
,
5
Barton-ASGhman Assoclatei. Ilk';,
.
.
'1'JIJlLE 3
SIWtED P1WaN3 R:lURLY IEWlD stIMIWi.'i'
ARiClU)IA GM'EWAY CENl'RE
WZEKDA Y
~- ~=..- ___a_-.:~=-~a"..=o::&:Z..z-: '!':r=::n--:~n~~~', ""':;.';llQ
CBD NCBD 80'1'1. RO'I'I. BOTL
HOUR OPCI Il!:'rL REST CIIIE RES RES ROOM COIlP COHV TOTALS
-----------------..--------------------------------------~------------~
6:00 All 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20
7:00 all 133 7 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 143
8:00 all 420 16 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 442
9.00 all 619 37 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 670
10:00 All 666 60 26' 0 0 0 0 0 0 753
11.00 all 666 17 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 783
12:00 II 599 86 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 752
1.00 PM 599 89 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 781
2.00 PM 646 86 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 8.12
3.00 PM 6i9 85 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 783
4.00 PM 513 77 66 0 0 0 0 0 0 656
5:00 PM 313 70 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 476
6:00 PI! 153 73 119 0 0 0 0 0 0 345
7:00 PM 47 79 132 0 0 0 0 0 0 258
8:00 PM 47 77 132 0 a 0 0 0 0 256
e 9'00 PM 20 54 132 a 0 a a 0 0 207
10,00 PM 20 28 119 0 0 0 0 0 0 168
11:00 PM 0 12 93 0 0 0 0 0 0 104
12:00 If 0 0 66 a 0 0 0 0 0 66
.__==c______.-_Q:_~__=_=_e.=-.".".iMl;a;'?'l~_._______~~ ~_ __..~#..WII.".
SA'l'tOO)AY
_DDm2~~_~.g~~_____.&~~~......KR~~ --.....~1tl1oll~~'ZI__..._..'..1
CBD Rcm IlO'l'L HO'1'L BO'l'L
HOUR OPCE RI!:'rL REST CINE RES RES 100II COllp CXlIIV TO'1'ALS
-------------------------~----------------------------~--~-------~----
6:00 all 0 0 o. 0 0 a 0 0 0 0
7:00 All 14 4 ] 0 a 0 0 0 0 22
8:00 All 43 9 4 0 0 Q 0 0 0 56
9:00 All 58 27 . 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 93
10:00 All 58 40 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 109
11:00 All 72 67 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 152
12:00 R 72 76 40 0 0 0 0 0 0 188
1.00 PII 58 85 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 202
2.00 PII U " .0 0 0 0 0 0 0 192
3.00 PII 211 89 60 0 0 0 a 0 a 178
4:00 III 29 80 60 0 0 0 0 0 0 1"
5.00 PII 14 67 79 0 0 0 0 0 0 161
.:00 PII 14 58 119 0 0 a 0 a 0 \92
7:00 PII 14 53 126 a 0 a 0 a 0 194
8:00 N 14 49 132 0 0 0 0 0 0 196
9:0q~PII 0 36 132 0 a 0 a 0 0 168
10:00 PI! a 36 12. 0 0 0 0 0 0 161
11:00 PI! 0 9 113 0 0 0 a 0 0 121
12:00 M 0 0 93 a a 0 0 0 0 u
- - - ---- ._"'''l_1~_Rft.~~~....?.R:.~.._. _ - --
e 6
.
.
e
e
Barton-Asehman A$~~l~~""'l!. !!'\.;,
CXlll:'U1S1/~
'lhis memorandum .report has described "In ;;n."llysig of shared parking fu,' I;h",
Arcadia Gateway Centre. '!he analysis has ex."ll\li.JlP.d t'.h~ il!pact.<;> Of' d glight
irv::I.'ease in rest..l.urant: liquare footage as \</ell as oonversion of a portl<..'ll or
the retail space for use by office-type teni1nts. 'Ihe analysis ha.c; shO'~'ro
that the peak parJdrq <\en>aTVl ::\1: the pr<.lj€'ct. wil 1 l:'l?pI'E'SeJ't. "''' <:1\1er.-111
parking ratio of 4,48 spaces pP.r 1,000 square f.eet, whjch is signiflr.~nt) r
lower t'.han the il:fPToved ratio of 4.60 spaoe.." per 1,000 square feel;, tn
OOllp-'U'ison, the project has a proposed parking ~y that is equ.!.vctll:'.nt t:;
4. 57 spaces per 1,000 square feet.
It is t'E!CXIOIlleI'l, therefore, that the approved p3.rJdTl} ratio for Ule
Arcadia Gateway Centre be revj!'".E!Q t,c:> 4, 57 parJd.ng "'P'l0e5 per 1,000 squal.'n
feet. .
,
,
7
.:.EF'-l~-:::-; TUE
~:~.~ ~ L~ G :~ ~S.SOC
P...O'::
eS\NG
.
e
e
STANLEY W. GI;iISSLE Q ASSOCIATES
September 12, ".1.989 VIA FACSIMILE
Ms. Donna Butler
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 West Huntington Drive
Arcadia, California 91006
RE: Arcadia Gateway Centre
Restaurant Pad B
Aroadia, California
Dear Donna:
Please find attached a letter froln Coldwell Banker signed by
Dorothy Wright, who is the Senior Vice President and Regional
Sales Manager for their Single Family division. I believe it is
sel t explanatory and should answer some at the questions that
you, BIll Wollard, Pete Kinnahan and I have discussed with
regards to their personnel and office.hours. I also hope to have
in your hands today a letter from Pennysaver stating that the
majority ot their personnel are in the field selling advertising
tor their tabloid.
Donna, we brietly discussed it, but, I hope that you will put in
your report that we were approved by Conditional Use Permit, the
right to have Three (3) tood users in the shop building not to
exceed 6,000 square feet total, and Thirty Six (36) sit down
seats total. As ot this date we have accomplished leasing to Two
(2) tood users Smooches, and Salsa del Rio. It Olive Garden is
approved W8 would relinquish the right to put another food user
into the Retail Shop Building. This, along with the COldwell
Banker and Pennysaver employees that spend the majority of their
time in the field, we would hope would be considered when
calculating-the blended use for parking requirements 'or the shop
building. .
I hope you have a good vacation. I am lOOking forward to seeing
you when you return. If you have any further questions or
require any further information at this time, please eall me.
Very trul~yours,
,
ibble , Associates
co: Stanley Gribble
COfr.fY'lsrCi8i Pf'lo~.,\ty Oe".IQprnonc. end rn"eecrnl!"c.
18401 Vo" K...m."Av."",.. S...'~. 130 "'''VIne. CA 92?1!5' C714} 26",-5464 F.AX(714) 28~-B33~
SEP-12-$-;' T'...IE:
~:s~ $ w I~ * AS$OC
P.€t3
.
.
e
e
..t4...."QII fMIf MAIl. '1IU-=~ ...~
I"" 704 ~6'2 aUSINES~
\8,"TOo.9OS. fAX
~
........
OOAOTHY A. WRIOHT
Srtot,n YIC'!oG, ~1l11,~,"'1
nv..,,,...l~~"l """"),~,,
COlDW[l,l 8"''''''(~A
f1tUIOl-.tlA.L ~E"\. t5r~Tf
~wc.,..'<lr." A\. E I'r!ivt
~1)OI.""'Ol'Cla$ C"91)61
September 1. 1989
Ms. Linda J. Barcelona
c/o Stanley W. Gribble I Associates
18401 Von Karmon Avenue. Ste, 130
Irvine. California 92715
Dear Linda:
This is to inform you that our intention Is to have a residential real
estate resale offiee at the Huntington Drive site in Arcadia. California,
Our plans are to have a full-time staff of approximately ten people Including
the manager and secretaries.
Although our sales staff will number 50 . 60 people. traditionally these
agents are assembled for approximately two hOurs. onee a week. for a sales
mee t I ng .
Since the sales agents are independently contracted to Coldwell Banker,
most of their time is spent in the field with customers and clients. and
they do not spend lengthy periods in the office.
Very truly yours.
AYc./i~'J JI tJ-,h'c1A./-'
Dorothy A. Wrtght ,.ft; A..)
Senior Vice President
Regional Sales Manager
,
OAW:Jh
cc: Rick Fa~endin
RECe.'VED
SfP 0 5 1989
A,,'4, .'
.............
SEP-12-S9 TWE 14:~7 $ W ~ e A$SOC
P. lj!12
,
~
-
..----
. ~ARTE.~ANk5 diRECT MARknING/cl\lifORNiA
.
2630 Q,bile, St,eel
P O. lox 1800
B,e.. eallfo,n'a t2622..eoo
(714) PM-6800
S.,tember t1, 1989
Stantey W. Grlbble and Aeeoe.
'8401 Von COfman AVlnue
Suite 130
hv",a, Ca 92115
Attn' MI. Linda B.re.10na
D.ar Llnda,
In r"pon,. co youf Inquiry .s co ~ow many employee. ar. on
.u. .t our na" "P.nnySav.r" ofUea In chi Arcaclia Gateway
C.ncra. chi follollln& t~ the way wa do bu. In....
.
A. A tot.l of 20 plople WOf~
to Of chac total, (4) four
Thee ere two (2) "tnaa.u
a.pr'.tntative.,
C. The remalninl (16)
Repr...ntative., ..Iltft& to
out ot the faCility.
are on .1 t. 90\ of the
and (2) two CuatOmer
time.
hrvic.
alxcttn are Outatde
the bu~tne., communicy.
$al..
There could b. a tlm., .pprodmately once.
20 paople could be u the heUlcy. ThU
monthly ..las me.tin,. lut, molt of tbe
aepr.eentacivee .r. in tht field.
Our Sal.. lepr...ntatlv" art p.id by 100'4 ot ch.ir he o I'll a
derlved from COII"IUlionl. So you c.n ... thac there i. an
inc.nttve on cheir part to not b. in the olflc..
--- .
montb I that a tt
would b. for .
tlme the S.h.
I hope thl. h.. cl.rHttd your quear.lon.
ple... call.
"ny .u"U01II,
obn Shtpe,
Plant !n.lne.~
,
J'/lJh
e
. k..,I.hld,
cOM_..lc.,io., COltpA""
';'~P- t "-s:l.~
.
.
e
e
File No. CUP 89-015
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACf
NEGA'I1Ve DRC.LARATION
CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA
A. Description of project: A conditional use permit for a restaurant with seating
for 280 persons.
B. Location of project: S/S of Huntington Drive, between 2nd & 5th
c
Name of applicant or sponsor:
Arcadia Gateway Centre Assoc.
D. Finding: This project will have no significant effect upon the environment
within the meaning of the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970 for
the reasons set forth in tbe attached Initial Study.
Eo Mitigation measures, if any, included in the projeCt to avoid potentially
significant effects:
,
Date: '
Signature
Date Posted:
SeniD'r' PlAnner
Title
.
.
e
e
Pile No.
CUP 89-015
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST PORM
A. BAaGllOtlND
1.
N_ of Proponent
Arcadia Gateway Centre Assoc.
18401 Von Karman Ave., #130
2.
Address and Phone Number of Proponent
Irvine, CA 92715
(714) 261-6464
. B.
ENV1BONMBH'rAL lMPACrS
(BlIplanat1ons of all .yes. and .maybe. answers axe required on attached sheets.)
1. !H:l!I. W111 UW pnIIIOMl nn1t. hit
... UUtal.. Mft!l. ,,*,u.s._ u La
~ 1a fM<\OIlo ...~,
b. Dl'napU... C1aItla...-u. ~
~.. O~ ",-'1'1,.111 ot tM Mt.ll
cr. aa-.. u tgp09ra&IbY 01' 9ftlCIllI
....rae. nU.1 l'ut.un.t
4. 'ftw "'UUC'CIOD. _I's.., en'
.....fiAUOll at aJlf ....... fClOtto
(g' pZlJ.lc.l tut.uul
'0 AD, iaori... La .W oc _UW
'hil100 of IOU.., .1ebu:' all U aU
~.1u'
f. CIlI....,.. LA ,UUUCID. .....ltJ.GIl
Gl' _to_ wMC$ .., ....". u.
=--, of . no",,!, ~ au...
9. __an of PIIGP&. or 9npany to
COrJ.'t:':~::l:=.-;~.
O'r .laU.u bPQOa'
2. !!J.. WUl U. propoI.l ...,all UII
.0 .~..l.u..uat.oU_
"-t;ertgnUOIl of ......& Ur qaaUtJf
.. ftIlI _t..loa of 1*'.......
-..,
!!! !Y!! ..!9.,.
II. ~ ftdDcUa ia ~
__ oI..tu ~ .....~
Iv ,*110 -US _u...1
1. ...... of ,..1e _ ~
to ..... NJ.etad ...... ... ..
l1t11D1Ua11 -
'0 l'1a.t IoU,. WiU U. ~ nnlt 10t
:; ~~ ofU: .:a-::':I :'~.
UDc111l11D1 u... 1II&nIIiI. ....... CftlllIlI.
II.I.cntlon ... ...-&10 phauJ1'
b. ~ Gf __ IIIlIIIIMa .. ..,
:r;-lCt:r- .. -:--& ... ~
o. ~.I._ of... ~ of
p1Glta lato _ .... .. ft:aalt M; .
bUs'1... tD t.IllI ~1 ,...1_'. L'
ot Idlau., ~,
5. H:-' 1.1111I, '1111 ta. pI'GPOIa.l ...a.t.
!S !!!!!! .!!!!.
'0 ~ ill _ d1'fUd~ 01 ~.
or ~ of .., -..ou. 01 ad-.l.a
(bUlla. lull aba1a iOIIl1.u.. n.,tt~~
Ibl\ d6 ....unU. ~. ~~
l-.otII 01' ~7
e. ~ cd tbiI .--. of ..,
~. .,... 01' ........ ~
..........
O. la~of_~"
~ UIt.o......___.....
. bad.Q to tbIi ....iIUaD .. ~
MDt: of --.la'
6. ~ Va ____. Yl1aUh
........
t. ..... 1rI.U 'tM ~ -ut. Ia.
.. ~Ia~..u.~'
.. -..-..-
_ ,_,a>
cr. .u.....u.u. of al, ___,
_.I..tan: 01' ualpenwc.. .. .."
crbutp U. v\.~, ei.UlU \.OI:aU"f
_ hli..u"
J. !!!l!s. _AU u.. ~&1 ~ tau
.. CIWl9'M 111 ~ CfI' U. OCIIII'M
0" dLnct.1oo Of ..t. ..-.ta ...
Ina!lI ..tan,
b~ QIIIlIt.. U ....,u. n-..
c&1Dafjf ~... CfI' U. ... ..
.-an 01: aut_ ..~ ....rn
cr. oUtouaU- to !:be ~ _
n_ 01' flood ..un' '-
.. ........ ...... till...-,
_ _ u._ _ ,.Ian'
I. ......_... 11111 tM ~ nAlt. sa
i""iiIii!iDua alund.clil of ..
....... .. flMMd ..... 1M at .. ...,
.. ~I -. If111 tba ..-.&
d. ~utlilil~ofeuf..
.aul' U alii' _ta> bMJ'
.. Du....... laW n:cl. _tltft. ...
a. ..., ...~c.... of ..,.. vatu
~qo. 1Ml........ ... ACIt UalhiI to
;uitui:ra;-' didol... ozn- oa'
,. oUt.N'au.. 0' CbII d1nooUa CII'
sou. 0' U_ 01 ~ _cen'
,. CIWlp Ia u.. ......er 01 tnaIIll
_tlm. '"tau ~ 41nft ......U-
iN ri~""', _ chroaP JA~
of .., aqaUu br _ GIr ucaauo.7
~~'r .... 01 De 01'.,
b. ~_~of..,
__ Ll-l. utual ........
It. ~.,~ --- !!! !1m! .!!!.
.,. . . 01 aD a;._s. 01'
tM nu.. of IN...... ........
. Uaol........ kIot. IIOC UlUUd to. oU.
r:-:1cl111e. -"'cab 01' ACkU.)
..... ..-at 01 _ ...u.o. ~
..... OIlIDlUuo..'
. u. 1P.'::.ltt. 0IU1 "'" _01 d-
. . .u.uUMtUoD. 6ataiQ.
01' lp'OrtJt. ca.. of t!Ie .... ~...
UOIl 01 u _..
u. !!!!!i _U1 tM pnpDQ1 IIttHll
. ~lnt. " CINaP a
-..s 0lI' Md1Uoul !loulDl' ...
... IL-H!I!!'J9"'Cl-iPlIU-. WUl
lUlU WlI
.. a.o.rac'" of .~taac1&1 MIl-
Lt._a! WUln1U' ___~..
b. att~........u., PU'1Uat
faclU,u.. OJ' ~ foil' _ ,.dUl9t
o. ."CUUal ~ ... "1.ll:bt
u&QporuU_ IIJ.~'
Co UunUou to pnMat .-ecUM
ctt~'l.Ulcl.c,,~o''''~
UlV_ voodI'
.0 Al.....u._ to~. ....1
01' -.11' tnlf101
I. J~ 1a tnff10 u.... to
~ 1'U.lou.. ttJ.1l7clUU 0If
.-s-tzi...,
... ~:..:HHr.:l~ ~.:Ii' ta.~
.... tw ~ ... ~tand ..Oft~
MWt_ lA .., 01 U. tou-t.llt'
_.
.. .ln~,
.. IoU_ ~1'
.. -...
.. .aa. .. .,.... _Uaad
fuUJ.u..l'
.. 1IIala...... 01 pl;lb11a 'UiU.
u.. laol_"', nrMliI'
e I. ou... JC4\-_tal ......~,
... !l!!m. .lU t. ~ null:; ....
.. on 01 ....tuuat ..,..u 01
'.1-. .-v'
.. _,*"-l4a1 1.ItcInue La .....
,.all ~ _____ 0' _. or
INoIl&in tae ~t 01 _
~o,_,
It. ~. lUll tile JlI'CPIP.l nult
.':tati'~-&l=.:I:..~ :. toU-
1At IJUUc.Ulll
.. ..... 0lI' u.tuaJ I.'
.. c-&oaUau 1IpU-'
.. .....,
.. a-u or ..,uo Uate,
.. .... -~ -~,
I. 80Ud ..... ... 4t.1I,,,,J.t
... ..~CJl. It1U tbe ...-..a
.. c:n.u. of .., .....u.. IIIuaz6 CII'
.....1..1 bu1t.11 buud (_1~
_tal....U,IlJ,
b. Ilir:pIMI1ft 01 pMlpM to ,...ad
....Ub M"" .
It.
"';rot:. IftU tile PftlPOiI&1 ..dt.
.. ~ of .., .~O
.ab 01' n. ... eo dill 1IGbUO. 0lI'
.U1 t.be ~ ...lIlt ta ...
~u. of ... ..o.u.~ ""'1..
.1te opa to ,..,lia n-t
~"U___o1'
.. 1IpOII_ 'P&UQ 01'
qQI;IIUCJ' af utatJat ncnaUaaJ,
appoftaDJ.U_t
!!! _.!!!l.
If.
...
_~,~.....:t. OUt...
n.u u..... tanUoD of
. ....tzl,U1_ U'dItIa1opAl lH'
autaliCl1 dte. auut._. Clb1....
01' bll1l41att
.......... .B"" ~..r "_Il~
e. _ pro .... ~ .1
to de9l'-.s. die qaauer ot die Uri~t..
...t.uU&Uy ~ tile babU.at of .
tUll or "UAlu. 1pM;1... .... . tlab
" "U41U. jIopal.uo. to lh'op lM~
..u-.~ w..1a. tUMt._ to
.1.JatDlla . p1M, _ aa1al --tr.
naIaae tIMI II~ 01' _t:r1.n tlIe .....
01 . 1'_ 01' ~ plat 01' -.la1
.. eUalMa ~ ....._ 01 Ule
_jOl' ..1.odIo of E:aUton1a 1&Ut:M7
.. pnb1etay'
b. eo. uie ~ect baw tU DOtatlIJ
to &Cdl1,... ,lIIloft,wbnl. ta u. tia.....cawe
of "....h.. ~1 """'" I.
Uort-taal'~ _ tile .n.~t
~~ :~~U: ::Ja~~lt.
...- ~ will.... ..U .Lat:o
tIMI'--.,
n.
.. ----....-
...... an Lailll~ U_e.t. bat
-'--U"'l1 ~1lI' II. tftIJeot
..,.......-.....-~
~-.nll:be~_...
neMIIW ... N1cU....' _11. boI: ......
Ute efhot; 01 Ute total 01 .... ~
- tIle~ u"'tzl,U~.J
4. 00.. 'th PftISMI\ __ _wt--.al
_11_ Wll1dl wlU __ .1Itat.aat41
....... ef,.. _ Ia_ bdaIa. eJ.tbu
41.~ OS': lDlU__1J't
C. DlacDIIlQl mo _....
~..z. nu.aan~
'.
,
D. ...
lto .. ~..... llr t!llI s.d ApMJ'J
OIl; . ....111 of W. lalUa1 ...........,
O~=,:-J; ---=-~~..::J:-":"=~e!;~
rill be .........
D~,,: :~-:.. t=..=----=~_:... ~1~.
... . ....'lODt; d,... .u tJW, oeM ___ U. Il1U,.u.e.
- ~ - .. ItUdled ..... ..... .... .... to
eM ,",!let. ... IIIIaftft -=.uanc. IIIW. . "'AID.
C Z 'lIId t!lie ~ Pft3_ ... .... . .lpU101at. etrea.
_t!le~._......... ~"'_.IC!'''''a.
-_.
,.
'.
, DaUl
9/1/89
(Signature)
.
.
FILE NO. /?;~ ..P~7 -C./s
A.
Applicant's Name:
ARCADIA GATEWAY CENTRE ASSOCIATES
Address:
18401 Von Karman Avenue 4 130, Irvine, California 92715
B. Property Address (Location): South side Huntington Drive between 2nd I> 5th
Avenue
C General Plan Designation: PD
n Zone Classification: CPD
Eo
Proposed Use (State exactly what use is intended for the property,
i.e., type, activities, employment):
The property is being used for mixed commercial develQpment including
retail restaurantssnd office. The applicant is now requesting a
e
restaurant tenant for Pad B as designated on the enclosed site plan.
F. Square Footage of Site: Approximately 396,000 square feet./
G Square Footage of Existing Buildings:
1. To Renudn: 172,000 square feet
2. To Be Removed: none
H Square Footage of New Buildings: 9,200 square feet
I. Square Footage of Buildings to be Used for:
e
~
1. Commercial Activities:
2-. Industrial Activities:
3. Residential Activities:
Number of Units: Six (6) plus a Parking Structure.
Environmental Information Form
-1-
.
.
I
e
J.
Describe the following:
1. The environmental setting of the project site as it exists.
The project currently has one (1) Medical Office Building open and
operating. Under construction a four story Office Building and a
Parking Structure. A Retail Shop Building complete and open. One (1)
Restaurant complete and open, and one (1) restaurant to be built.
2. The proposed alterations to the project site.
Development of a new Restaurant Building.
3. The use and development of the surrounding properties.
Directly to the east is an existing Three Story Bank Building,
directly behind the structure, the Atcheson, Topeka and Santa Fe
Railroad, across the street a mixed use of Hotels and Restaurants.
Directly to the west of the building vacant property and the Railroad
,
overpass.
.
Environmental Information Form
-2-
.
.
.
K
-
Check the appropriate answers to the following questions:
fi1 liQ
1.
Will the proposed project result in a substantial
alteration of ground contours and/or alteration
of exiting drainage pattern?
,./
2.
Will the proposed project result in a change in
groundwater quality and/or quantity?
v
3.
Will the proposed project result in an increase in
noise, vibration, dust, dirt, smoke, fumes, odor or
solid waste?
/
4.
Will the proposed project result in the use or
disposal of potentially hazardous materials?
v
5. Will t~e proposed project result in a substantial
increase in demand for municipal services
and/or energy consumption?
v
Explain in detail any "YES" answers to the above questions on
additional sheets.
L. Provide any additional information which would elaborate on the
potential environm.ental consequences resultant from the proposed
project.
M. Certification: I hereby certify that the statements furnished above
and in the attached exhibits present the data and information
required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that
the facts, statements and information presented are true and correct
to the best of my knowledge and belief.
Date: .
e
31 .,6 u P 1'11'1
.
~
1fr /~ of
Environmental Information Form
-3.