HomeMy WebLinkAbout1738 (3)
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 1738
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT 2005-018 AND ARCillTECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW 2005-
03 TO PERMIT A 38,990 SQUARE FOOT, 24-HOUR FITNESS
HEALTH CLUB, AND A MODIFICATION TO ALLOW 280 PARKING
SPACES IN LIEU OF 791 SPACES REQUIRED FOR THE EXISTING
RESTAURANT AND NEW HEALTH CLUB AT 125 N. FIRST
A VENUE
WHEREAS, the City of Arcadia on January 20, 2005, received art Architectural
Design Review application followed by a Conditional Use Permit application on October
25, 2005 by Laura Whelan of Dorn Platz & Company on behalf of 24-Hour Fitness to
permit a new 38,990 square foot, 24-hour Fitness health club, and a modification to allow
280 parking spaces in lieu of 791 spaces required for the existing restaurant and new
health club at 125 N. First Avenue; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act,
Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq. ("CEQA"), and the State's CEQA
Guidelines, the City of Arcadia prepared an Initial Study and determined, there is no
substantial evidence that the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 05-018 and
Architectural Design Review No. 05-03 would result in a significant adverse effect on the
environment Accordingly, a Negative Declaration has been prepared and notice of that
fact was given in the manner required by law; and
1
.
.
.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission on December 13,
2005, at which time all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and
present evidence.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION I. That the factual data submitted by the Development Services
Department in the attached report is true and correct.
SECTION 2. This Commission fmds:
1. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental
to the public health or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in such zone
or vicinity because the proposed use will be compatible with the surrounding uses, and it
will be an appropriate use for the subject site, and the proposed project will provide
adequate parking for the new health club and existing restaurant.
2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is a proper one for
which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized.
3. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate said use. All yards, spaces, loading, landscaping, parking, and other
features are adequate to adjust said use with the land and uses in the neighborhood. The
2
.
.
.
proposed project complies with all related zoning requirements as set forth in the Arcadia
Municipal Code.
4. That the site abuts three streets that are adequate in width and pavement
type to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use.
5. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not adversely
affect the comprehensive General Plan because the land use and current zoning are
consistent with the General Plan.
6. That the use applied for will not have a substantial adverse impact on the
environment, and that based upon the record as a whole there is no evidence that the
proposed project will have any potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the
habitat upon which the wildlife depends.
SECTION 3. Thatfor the foregoing reasons this Commission grants Conditional
Use Permit No. CUP 05-018 and Architectural Design Review No. 05-03 to permit a 24-
hour Fitness health club and a modification to permit 280 parking spaces in lieu of 791
spaces required for the existing restaurant and new health club at 125 N. First Avenue,
upon the following conditions:
1. Prior to issuance of a building l>ermit. a lot consolidation of the
subject lots must be recorded by the Los Angeles County Recorder's Office to create
an appropriate parcel for the proposed development.
3
2. The parking structure shall provide free-parking with no security
. gates.
.
.
3. All the light fixtures shall be hooded and arranged to reflect away
frOm the adjoining properties and streets.
4. No metal screens or coverings are permitted between the columns on
the first level of the parking structure that faces Santa Clara Street.
5. A minimum of 280 on-site parking spaces shall be provided (50
surface spaces, and 230 spaces within the parking structure). All parking spaces must
be double striped in accordance with Municipal Code Section 9269.8.1.
6. A landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted for review and
approval by the Community Development Administrator, or his/her designee prior to
issuance of a building permit.
7. All the City's parkway trees shall remain.
8. Approval of CUP 2005-018 and ADR No. 2005-03 shall not take
effect until the property owner(s) and applicants have executed and filed the
Acceptance Form available from the Development Services Department to indicate
awareness and acceptance of these conditions of approval.
9. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of
Arcadia and its officers, employees, and agents from and against any claim, action, or
4
proceeding against the City of Arcadia, its officers, employees or agents to attack, set
.
aside, void, or annul any approval or condition of approval of the City of Arcadia
concerning this project and/or land use decision, including but not limited to any
approval or condition of approval of the City Council, Planning Commission, or City
Staff, which action is brought within the time period provided for in Government
Code Section 66499.37 or other provision oflaw applicable to this project or decision.
The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding
concerning the project and/or land use decision and the City shall cooperate fully in
the defense of the matter. The City reserves the right, at its own option, to choose its
own attorney to represent the City, its officers, employees, and agents in the defense
.
of the matter.
SECTION 4.
The decision, findings and conditions contained in this Resolution
reflect the Commission's action of December 13, 2005, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
SECTION 5.
The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and
shall cause a copy to be forwarded to the City Council of the City of Arcadia.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing Resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of
. the Planning Commission held on the 13th day of December 2005, by the following votes:
5
.
.
.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
A TIEST:
Secretary, Planning Commission
City of Arcadia
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~r.~
Stephen P. Deitsch, City Attorney
Chairman, Planning Commission
City of Arcadia
6
.
.
.
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. Project Title:
Conditional Use Permit No. 2005-018 and Architectural Design Review
No, 05-03
2. Project Address (Location): 125 N. First Avenue
3. Project Sponsor's Name, Address & Telephone Number;
Dorn Platz & Company
Attn: Laura Whelan, Project Manager
210 S, Orange Grove Boulevard
Pasadena, CA 91115
4. Lead Agency Name & Address:
City of Arcadia - Development Services Department
Community Development Division - Planning Services
240 W. Huntington Drive
Post Office Box 60021
Arcadia. CA 91066-6021
5. Lead Agency Contact Person & Telephone Number:
Lisa Flores, Senior Planner
(626) 574.5445
Central Business District
6. General Plan Designation:
7. Zoning Classification:
8. Description of Project:
A Conditional Use Permit to permit a 38,990 square foot, 24-Hour Fitness health club; and a
modification to allow 280 parking spaces in lieu of 791 spaces required for the existing
restaurant and new health club.
CBD & H4
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the project's surroundings.)
North:
South:
East:
West:
Santa Fe Railroad right-of-way and offices
Medical and General Offices
Office Building
United States Postal Office
.
.
.
File No. CUP 05-018
end ADR No. 05-03
10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing approval,
or participation agreement):
N/A
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIAllY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be. potentially affected by this project,
involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the
checklist on the following pages.
[ 1 Aesthetics [ 1
[ 1 Biological Resources [ 1
[ 1 Geology/Soils [ 1
[ 1 Hydrology/INater Quality [ 1
[ ] Mineral Resources [ 1
[ 1 Population & Housing [ 1
[ 1 Recreation [ 1
[ 1 Utilities and Service Systems
[ 1 Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION (To be completed by the lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
Air Quality
Cultural Resources
Hazards & Hazardous Materials
land Use & Planning
Noise
Public Services
Transportation / Circulation
[Xl I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[l I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation
measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[l I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
[l I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, but
that at least one effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards and has been addressed by mitigation measures based on
that earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, and if any remaining effect is a
"Potentially Significant Impact' or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it only needs to analyze the
effects that have not yet been addressed.
-2-
CECA Env. Checklist Part 1
.
.
.
File No. CUP 05-018
and ADR No. 05-03
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect In this case because all potentially
significant effects have been analyzed adequately in an earlier Environmental Impact
Report pursuant to applicable standards and have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to
that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the
proposed project.
By: Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator
[ ]
For: The City of Arcadia - Development Services Department
~,61L~
Signature
fl~ch
Date
Lisa Flores
Printed Name
Donna Butler
For
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impacf' answers that are
adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses
following each question. A "No Impacf' answer is adequately supported if the referenced
information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects such as the one
involved (e.g., the project is not within a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should
be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards
(e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-
specific screening analysis).
2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-
site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction related
as well as operational impacts.
3. "Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate If there is substantial evidence that an effect
is significant. If there are one or more, "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the
determination is made, an Environmental Impact Report is required.
4. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of
mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impacf' to a "Less
Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and
briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation
measures from Section 17 "Earlier Analyses" may be cross-referenced).
5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program Environmental
Impact Report, or other CECA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an
earlier EIR or Negative Declaration {Section 15063(c)(3)(D)}. Earlier analyses are
discussed in Section 17 at the end of the checklist.
-3-
CECA Env. Checklist Part 1
.
.
.
File No. CUP OS:018
and ADR No. 05-03
a) Earlier Analyses Used; Identify and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were
within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by
mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation
Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures that were incorporated or
refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific
conditions for the project.
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate Into the checklist, references to infonnation
sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a
previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to
the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7. Supporting Infonnation Sources. A source list should be attached, and other sources used
or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8. The explanation of each Issue should identify:
a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less.lhan significant.
-4.
CECA Env. Chacklist Part 1
File No.: CUP 05-018 and
ADR No. 05-03
. Less,Than
Potentially Slgnlflcant Less Than
Slgnlflcant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incofporation
1. AESTHETICS - Would the project
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0 0 0 181
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited 0 0 0 181
to, trees, rock outcroppings, .and historic buildings within a state
scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of
the site and its surroundings?
o
o
o
181
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would
advel'$ely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
o
o
181
o
.
The proposed project will not affect any scenic vista since the proposed project will not be located
near iii scenic vista or highway. Also, the proposed design has been conceptually approved through
design review to ensure the architectural style compiles with the City's Central Business District
Design Guidelines. Therefore, the proposed project will not create a significant adverse Impact In
terms of aesthetic to the adjacent land uses.
2.
AGRICULTURE RESOURCES - In detennining whether impacts
to agriculture resources are significant environmental effects,
lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land
Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the
Califomia Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in
assessing impacts on agriculture and fannland. Would the
project:
a) ConvElrt Prime Fannland, Unique Fannland, or Fannland of
StateWide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (The
Fannland Mapping and Monitoring Program in the Califomla
Resollrces Agency to non-agricultural use?
o
o
o
181
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson
Act contract?
o
o
o
18I
c) Involve other changes in the eXisting environment which, due to
their location or nature, could result in conversion of Fannland-to
non-agricultural use?
o
o
o
181
.
CEQAChecklist
4
.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
File No.: CUP 05-018 and
ADR No. 05-03
Less Then
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
The proposed project Is consistent with the Commercial land use designation of the General Plan and
with the height overlay of H4 since It Is required to comply with the regulations of any other
Jurisdictional agency environmental regulations. As such, the proposed project will have no Impacts
em agricultural resources.
3. AIR QUALITY - Where available, the significance criteria
established by. the applicable air quality management or air
pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following
determinations. Would the project;
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air
quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute sUbstantially to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
.
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria
pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including
releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors)?
e) !::xpose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
f) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of
people?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
IZl
o
IZl
o
IZl
o
IZl
IZl
o
The proposed project Is consistent with the South Coast Air Quality Management District Air Quality
Management Plan (SCAQMD) based on the discussion below.
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through
habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
.
b) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or
other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional
plans, policies, and regulations or by the California Department of
Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
o
o
o
o
o
IZl
o
IZl
CEQA Checklist
5
File No.: CUP 05-018 and
ADR No. 05-03
. Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands 0 0 0 [81
as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including but
not limited to , marsh, vemal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological interruption or other means?
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident 0 0 0 [81
or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery
sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological 0 0 0 [81
resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation 0 0 0 [81
Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved
local, regional or state habitat conservation plan?
. There will be no elimination or reduction In the numbers of unique, rare, or endangered species of
plants since the subject site does not contain any known populat/ons of rare or endangered species,
only non-native plant species. The project will not Introduce any new species Into the area, or result
In a ba"ler to the normal replenishment of exlst/ng species since the proposed project will only
temove annual, non-native, or ornamental plant/ngs. Therefore, the project will not reduce the acreag,e
of any agricultural crop since the subject site Is not an agricultural use.
As for the De Minimis Impact Finding, there Is no evidence before the City that the proposed project
will have any potent/al adverse effect on wildlife resources.
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Cause a substantia.1 adverse change in the significance of a 0 0 0 [81
historical resource as defined in ~ 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change In the significance of an 0 0 0 [81
archaeological resource pursuant to ~ 15064.5?
c) Directly or Indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or 0 0 0 [81
site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those Interred outside of 0 0 0 [81
fonnal cemeteries?
.
CEOA Checklist
6
File No.: CUP 05-018 and
ADR No. 05-03
. Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact MItigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
There are no paleontological resources on the project site and the existing building and site is not a
potential cultural resource. Also, the site Is not located in a sensitive area for these resources. As
such, there is no Significant Impact to cultural resources.
6. GEOLOGY AND SOilS - Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse 0 0 ~ 0
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the 0 0 0 ~
most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on
other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? 0 0 ~ 0
Iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? 0 0 0 ~
.
v) Landslides? 0 0 0 ~
b) Result in substanllal soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? 0 0 0 ~
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that 0 0 0 ~
would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentialiy
result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or coliapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil as defined in Table 1B-1-B of the 0 0 0 ~
Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or
property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic 0 0 0 ~
tanks or altemative waste water disposal systems where sewers
are not available for the disposal of waste water?
.
CECA Checklist
7
.
.
.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
File No.: CUP 05-018 and
ADR No. 05-03
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
According to the CIty's General Plan there are two local faults: Raymond Hili Fault and the Sierra
Madre Fault. The closet active fault to the subject site is the Raymond Hili Fault, which underlies to
the north of the subject site. However, the proposed structures will be required to conform to the
most current local, state, and federal building standards for the foundation design, bearing values,
continuous wall footings, footings, settlement, earth pressures, slab on grade, and grading.
7. VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the
project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions
Involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous
materials sites complied pursuant to Govemment Codl!l Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it .create a significant hazard to
the public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in
the project area?
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted
emergency response,plan or emergency evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving wild land fires, including where wild lands are
adjacent. to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
181
o
o
o
o
181
181
181
o
181
181
181
181
CEQACheckllst
8
.
.
.
with wild lands?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
File No.: CUP 05-018 and
ADR No. 05-03
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
IncOrporation
Le.. Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
There are no hazardous substance or waste on the subject site. Even though the existing Citizens
Bank was built after 1978. SECOR Inc. recommends prior to demolition that a comprehensive.
EPAlHUD-level Lead Based Paint Survey and a complete AHERA level pre-demolition Asbestos Survey
prior to any demolition activlt/es,slnce It may disturb any lead paint present.
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
b) Substantialiy deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be
a net deflcit In aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level (i.e.. the production rate of pre-existing
nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been
granted)?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or
area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or
river, in a manner which would result In substantial erosion or
siliration on or off-site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or
area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or
river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface
runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the
capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or
provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
f) OtherWise substantially degrade water quality
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area, as mapped
on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate
Map or other flood hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 1Oe-year floodplain structures which would impede
or redirect flood flows?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
IZI
IZI
IZI
IZI
IZI
IZI
IZI
IZI
CEOA Checklist
9
.
.
.
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk, of loss, injury or
death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the
failure of a levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami or mudflow?
k) Potential impact of project construction on storm water runoff?
I) Potential impact of project post-construction activity on storm
water runoff?
m Potential for discharge of storm water from areas from material
storage, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing),
waste handling. hazardous materials handling or storage,
delivery areas or loading docks, or other outdoor work areas?
n) Potential for discharge of storm water to cause significant harm
on the biological integrity of the waterways and water bodies?
0) Potential for discharge of storm water to Impair the beneficial
uses of the receiving waters or areas that provide water quality
benefit?
p) Potential for significant changes In the flow velocity or volume of
storm water runoff that can use environmental harm?
q) Potential for significant increases in erosion of the project site or
surrounding areas?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
File No.: CUP 05-018 and
ADR No, 05-03
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
No
Impact
[81
[81
[81
[81
[81
[81
[81
[81
[81
The proposed project will not change the currents, or the course of direction of water movements In
either marine or fresh waters, as the project Is not located In marine or fresh water setting. Also, the
entire City Is located In Flood Zone D, which has no mandatory flood Insurance purchase
requirements. As such, there are no floodplain regulations.
The proposed project must also comply with all the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System
(NPDESj requirements.
CEQA Checklist
10
.
10.
.
.
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural
community conservation plan?
The proposal Is consistent with the Commercial land use designation of the General Plan and with the
CBD zone, and it will be required to comply with the regulations of any other Jurisdictional agency with
applicable environmental regulations. As such, staff there will be no Impact to the land use since the
underlying zone and land use will remain the same.
9. LAND USE AND PLANNING- Would the project:
a) Physically dlvidEl an established community?
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of
an agel1cy with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not
limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or
zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project;
a)
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that
would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral
resource recovElry site delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan or other land use plan?
File No.: CUP 05-018 and
ADR No. 05-03
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant No
Impect Impect
o
o
o
IZI
o
o
o
IZI
o
o
IZI
o
o
o
IZI
o
o
o
o
IZI
Due to the nature of the proposed project, the project may increase the demand of energy sources or
require new sources of energy or Impact natural resources the new health club will be significantly
larger than the existing bank building. As a result, the proposed project will be required to comply
with the energy and water conservation requirements contained in the Uniform Building Code. As
such, the project would not result In the use of water and energy In a wasteful manner, resulting In no
significant Impact to energy and mineral resources.
11. NOISE - Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessivegroundbome
vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase In ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
o
o
IZI
o
o
o
IZI
o
o
o
IZI
o
CEOA Checklist
11
.
.2.
.
File No.: CUP 05-018 and
ADR No,. 05-03
PotenUally
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
l~cOrporaUon
No
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise 0 0 181 0
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where 0 0 0 181
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airpClrt or public use airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
project expose people residing or-working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
o
o
rgJ
o
The proposed project is subject to Planning Commission's review and the Commission may impose
conditions to ensure that the noise Impacts are minimized to the abutting tenants. Conditions may
include, but not limited to restricting the hours of operation. As mitigated, there will be no significant
Impact to the noise as a result of this project.
POPULATION AND HOUSING . Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly
(for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or
Indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other
infrastructure)?
o
181
o
o
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
o
181
o
o
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
o
181
o
o
The proposed project will have no significant impact to population and will not cause substantial
impacts to the local population projections, Induce substantial growth, or displace existing house
sinr:e no housing is proposed wltli this project. As such, there will be no significant impact to
population and housing as a result of this project.
13. PUBLIC SERVICES - Would the project:
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associeted with
the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities,
need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
Impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response
CEQA Checklist
12
.
.
.
times or other performance objectives for any of the public
services:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
File No.: CUP 05-018 and
ADR No. 05-03
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
o
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
NO
Impact
181
181
181
181
181
The proposed project would not result In a new or altered the government services. Therefore, there
are no significant Impacts to public services as a result of this project.
14. RECREATION - Would the project:
a) Increase the use of el(isting neighborhood and regional parks or
other recreational facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expanSion of recreational facilities, which have an
adverse physical effect on the environment?
o
o
o
o
o
o
181
181
The proposed project will not result in an Increase in the demand for recreational facilities since the
proposed use does not consist of housing. Therefore, the proposed project will not increase the
demand for housing or regional parks or other recreational facilities.
15. TRANSPORTATlONfTRAFFIC - Would the project:
a) Cause an Increase in traffic which is substantial In relation to the
existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result
In a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the
volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at
intersections)?
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service
standard established by the county congestion management
agency for designated roads or highways?
c) Result in a chemge in air traffic pattems, including either an
increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results In
substantial safety risks?
o
o
o
o
o
o
181
o
o
o
181
181
CEOA Checklist
13
.
.
.
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting
alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
Traffic and parking study was prepared by Linscott, Law and Greenspan to evaluate any potential
Impacts from the new health club. Based on the analysis, the City Engineer determined that the
proposed project will not create any significant Impacts at any of the major Intersections since the
fitness center generates less traffic than the existing bank building. Even though the proposed health
club will not meet the minimum parking requirement per City's Code, the Institute of Transportation
(ITE) parking generation data only shows that 277 parking spaces would be needed during peak period
for both the health club and existing restaurant As a result, the proposed parking of 280 parking
spaces would be more than adequate to accommodate parking for both uses.
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or Incompatible uses
(e,g" farm equipment)?
e) Result in Inadequate emergency access?
f) Result In Inadequate parking capacity?
16.
UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS - Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable
Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result In the construction of new water or wastewater
treatment facilities or expanSion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage
facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from
existing antlUements and resources, or are new or expanded
entitlements needed? In making this determination, the City shall
consider whether the project is subject to the water supply
assessment requirements of Water Code Section 10910, etseq,
(SB 610), and the requirements of Government Code Section
664737 (8B221).
File No.: CUP 05-018 and
ADR No, 05-03
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
No
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
D
D
IZI
D
D
D
IZI
D
D
o
IZI
D
D
D
IZI
D
D
D
D
IZI
D
D
IZI
D
D
D
D
IZI
D
D
D
IZI
CEQA Checklist
14
File No.: CUP 05-018 and
ADRNo.05-03
, Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact MiUgation Impact Impact
Incorporation
e) Result In a determination by the wastewater treatment provide D D D [g!
which serves or may serve the project determined that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in
addition to the provider's existing commiln,lenls?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to D D D [g!
accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state and local statues and regulations
related to solid waste?
D
D
D
[g!
It Is anticipated that the project would connect to existing power and natural gas Infrastructure In the
vicinity of the project site. Construction contractors are required by state law (CA Government Code
Section 4216) to coordinate with Underground Services Alert (Dig Alert) prior to excavation to
determine the location of the existing utilities.
.
The City of Arcadia and County Sanitation District of Los Angeles (CSDLAC) will provide wastewater
service to the project area, and Southern California Gas Company (SCGC) would provide natural gas
to the proposed project
Therefore, the proposed project Is not anticipated to result In a significant impact related to power and
natural gas.
17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of
the major periOdS of California history or prehistory?
The proposed project will not potentially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wlidllfe species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a
rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate Important examples of the major period of California
history or prehistory. As such, there alll no significant impacts to this mandatory finding of
significance as a result of this project.
D
D
D
[g!
b Does the project have impacts that are Individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means
that the Incremental effects of 8 project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects
of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
D
D
D [g!
~
CEOA Checklist
15
.
.
.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
File No.: CUP 05-018 and
ADR No. 05-03
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
The proposed project will not have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable
since It wlil be compatible with the surrounding uses.
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
Indirectly?
o
o
o
181
CEOA Checklist
16
tl
N
lGO 0 1/10 200 Feet
I""'" ,
0125 N First Ave
o Arcadia
~ Zone
tts
125 N First Avenue
CUP 05-18
ADR os -D3
Development Services Department
Engineering Division
Prepaffld by: R.S,GonzaIez. November 2005
~ ~ (214)
N
100 0 100 Feet q:
. , d'C
..... (20&-208)
~~ CI)
a:: (202)
-39) LI: (113)
SANTA CLARA ST
~ W
i/"',0 /0:
m~
~
"l.: ~ ~~
~
~
~ ~
'/. ~ ~
W ~
~
I'l. W
~
@ ~
'/.
(100)
(113) (115)
WHEELER ST
(~50)
(65)
(26-28)
(20-22)
II I 1',
~
- I
I I I
tis
125 N First A venue
CUP 05.18
ADR lyS"D3
Development Setvices Depetfment
Engineering DMskm
ProptltOd by: R.s,-.z. NaYombe< 2005
.
.
.
: -i!l {\. '... 7
I .1 IL; - - ,,^.
I u...r I
L___ 'I ,I
r--n
~.--- i I (
1 ' ,
r==== I I
~==== i I -"
1____ t II
r---- If
F-m i I!
1==== . I
i-h- I I
f====i i I
f===-" A.
I
i==== i .1 ...
f==== I'ill! .~:~ ..../
i-m i' ~//.
1==== i'" ('- n. .
t==== j !I I.j ~. I
F=== 'i.1 ....:: ~ 1::..- L....
i==== li.l , ~ ';"-
L__ I, 15 I ~ " == = /
r--- I' ,I' I;. i' 1'1.1
inn ,I 06-
I m_ I I . I . II'" r-- .YI
Ie"; i: I I' . .1Ii . . .
I i'( II'. 4-
.p o'i I I;'! ,.
1 !, I I:=:=> ~;
- Ir- --.. j ..,., I~' /
!! II gJ' ~ I! I . . ;. . ~ . ., ~'l' ~'
::" _ ,I ~.!b _ .
!No I I I \I "'I).
--;....jf.. L;-'-- ~~':...
_-- _J)"'" I ,\., --
., /~..._, \- .. c=> r"l.. n
-rV!~ ij [Y · t .
111: ! I iz"'-~---.:-----=--=-- --~-
__. I.'. _+._.
J\ :: ~ I
.' *:' \t Ii"
1
~
. n
p
'I
~
II
'I
!I
~Ij
Ii!l>" II I'
,I
.~ !i
~ II
4- jl
... ---l I I:
oj -r ~ ~
~ ~ ~ W ~Ij, ~ I~ (="".."~.~
l i if:' 1\ . ~ . ~~ I,' ~a 'E' t@ .~=-=-
" ,. a ~" -,.......-
" I-"- I / I h: '. L.. 'i ~...,...-....._..~
I,' a 1/ jl f, I. .....-
w_~-::"_ {~~ I . I I PIMOIE:llulFUFCltt,AlUW..IIMI
:-... ~ a ~ a II ~ ~ j; I I _u,_u",""
, EiU.,......~ IImIiI .e I 'ltI . ~ --, r , i
-I '1 ~ ~ .' q ___ _ ~.- - ~S= i .~
Ii :ij:' ~ ." \~ -D ~ I _ yt.:~_--=--=-
RfSTAlY ..~ ~ j:e=-J ~( .~ }d
-If ---'--r _~Aa--'f-~' - .. " .: '-'-'/;t}' ..
__ I -____ _ I ___'" :.. L. II ~ 1,/
I I ----- -----. '\. --- \------- --II . //i
":;' I
, k; I
..
.
1 .
I .
I '"~
'-'Il'lltI.lI 1-1'._ 11:1
_._lllo;:i,M;1froR'lC.~
._,.........~......... - I :
"
.
;.
l I .
'1 .~:":
.~ . 4- '\
T
.. !!' . .. .
V ;.
E:IIS1M1IPf....-,ro.--~
tCJTlWIlOl'na~
J, i
...
'\.
+ '""i-;--!
-
I a
~-_._---
\~,. I\! I I ,t' ~. " I
I I , : :~: , : i : : r I
I ILl l ! I ! : : : :
I : : If:....
~ L-=\;
, , .
~1Ii1
IB-' I
.
.
.....11
PROJECT SUMMARY
VlTNsrI"l!<<.o..a.tl1lCfll~"
~"Q.'",lifp"'f'lSCJ
P,wD..:.........u..,
I:;:llInlC_Ul._lWUI_e.a~
DmNloflESl.l.UllW1m.I!EWIM_1J11l11'.
--.
""~flUEa~..,_SI'
F"".....n..TltWII
--=
,.~~....it.NE
~1InT....:..n_7....._..
rol................
.......
~<<& - vau..,,_U18
IUIAUODUlll.'~_.;._.."
lom_l,t.'
-
Kl\92W'AACiIlIIJI.~lXIDi
I~SFClffilQfl<PUT_
t...al:fl>>_,iisPAl:E
'~.O#'CIl'J!C[~
I,llttn_~''''_'
"2.'."~":10l-nll
-
..-...-
-~-
-
-.-
..-
d_~
~.-
-~-
--
FIRST FlOOR PI..AN I SITE PlAN
SCA.L.E1116"'"1'.ff'
tIJ-L1
,;L
L
:t:11: , .
~U ~
.
.
. ... .
. ,
, .
II
OII"!.~~
ARCADIA FITNESS CENTB.
l:UNOllnlFIRSTAVENUE AlCAOlA.CA91
_ocroBat'I?
.
"
oj
:i~.' . ~I
o.!k"'~
~ II ;;l
, . .
. ,
.Sl
.c:; I
I
r.,
:~.
L..J
)" .
.z
e
L I I t I"
. ,
s~
-5:' I
....
- -
. . . .
I .. I.
=a.
..
"' >. >. "'
---
.....
"' "' "' >.
.. I.
i =.L
..
"' . "'
-
.
..
SECOND FlOOR PlAN
SC'J,E UHf' ~ l' - 0"
fU'LJ
.
.
~
. ..mfi[l
II
aorY~~
ARCADIA FITNESS CENTR
m NORTHFlRST Av:ENUE ARciDlA.CA 91
0CT0BEIl17.
..
THIRD FlOOR PlAN
SCALE1116":a1'.rr
fttLj
.
.
.
II
ONY~
ARCADIA FITNESS CENTR
125NORnfFlRSrAVENIJ1: AJlCAJ>>A,C\ 91
OCTOBEK 17,
..
.
.
~ ~
_ ~"""l:lI"""'__"._"._
- -
=
E"
E9
=-'l
L:::::l
V._
E9
e
E9
.Q
"
IlL
oo_..~
--.
--
_...."*<1_
.--
~
FOURTH FLOOR PlANIROOF PlAN
SCAlE 1118" "1'-0"
tIH...J
to
.
e-
!
=>
"""'-
E9
.-'
E9
II
G\O:'(~C::~
.
._a
___110_
:;:-..:-...-
ARCADIA FITNF.!iS CENTR
IUNORTHflRSTAVENUE ARCAmA.CA 91
OCTOBEK 11,
.
.
.
-
_'0
"GIoP~
"""
-
q
FlRST AVENUE ElEVATlO
""""" ......
ATPOllI.NlEA
""
"""""..
-.,
...,""""'"
.........=
...,""""'"
.........
-...
~..
-"'~
fCIlUJ1:111;orwOF
--""'"
llOI'TCI'Pf"Y
.......
.""'"
-
"-""1EIl$""
"'~
'1l'ffl
.'l\Ilffl
. "a!ffl
SANTAaARAELEVATION
~-
,~.
_w_
-~
....
"""""'...
-
.,
~,-
.......,
II
~~
ARCADIA FITNESS CENTR
11'NOR;THFlllSTAVENUE AllCADtA.CA 91
OCTOBER 11,
ElEVATIONS
SCALE 1i8"= l' ~rr.
ItH..-I
9V
t9-'A'
9-\al'-
~'
.
sw
SWJ'
~'
6>\llJ'
.
.
SOUTH ELEVATlON
"''li'J-0
~
-
~
~
..
, '11J-S
ELEVATll)NS
SCALE1.18"S11'-U"
PHASE 2 PARKING EXPANSION
.-
"""""
-...
.......
CONCAEtl1l1l,lItI'.
ItlAT~IIiOl.N
"11-0
VEST ElEVATION
ARCADIA FITNESS CENTR
11SNOJ!:1HmSTAlJEMJE AJlC\1)1A,CA 91
OCTOBER. 11.
CAaTGCIICc-l
""..,.-
~, -
.
.-
""""""
-..
II
OI/.YX""'CJU1'llCTl
::.=--
~_M ~~CUfCQlCJlElf r-!"""''''
""" -.....
~.
-
" -
c
fiMr/;bE$Sl I ". P: :t ;:i: P:
, . I ~ :t
, - -
.
.
f 1'1'
,
:~"~I ,
'.: :
,
---
.........
r--~~ r-IIIQN
I
-
o D
......F
, a turn, T
!
,:. '~~. .. '
~ U;l' .
L _
...- -
- -
aev.-.
SCALE '18"-1'.0"
IU1-J
.,
.u!
, H
., R
.
.
~ If l II
1.-___ LOS\' -__A.l
ATI'OCll._ ~c.l
1=
i+l., ::l:
~
~ I'
--
..
-""""-
-~
,...--I'CUfalli:
-"
-==
~
r-....~
u.
":J~ l hi
Te_I' .
i~ "Fa] l..-
~ ':~-
'.~ {:.
-eurQCH::. -lll.0000fM.
IIWlIGOCoI UWl'I
L-__
-...
A
.
~_N
~
-~
-, '83 1
-I, ~I: ....,u ~ ~~~br '_
. ct. , ,', ,'r9! >F i 1. ...._
'.' tfJ'1;;;;.-'716>
I 'm, Ja~ -"'
.i~!~M!' t
--- ~-_\._~ -
_c.t Il\,U:tVDGl _""
. -
FlRST AVENUE aevATION
-- ~-
--
_M
. "''llIHl
.' ~
II I I I I I I I r I I I
.. ~
II I I I 11 I I 1 I I I .
.....,... ~.: , l-~
~...'-........ .
- L__
SANrA ClARA B.EVATION
-- L-""""
omwq -~ .........
ARCADIA PlTNESS CBNTBR
125NOa11lfQlSTAVEmm AIlCADIA,CA 9100!ii
oc:niBs 11.lOOS
~
~."
&--t=.-
<9-'1':'
.
;...
.
PHASE21PARKiNe OOANSIQN
""
.....
.
.
$W
5WJ'
.'
a?':'""i
st:fJ ....
~l'lI'
Cl'IIIl'lXIflG.o.l
......-
...
'.'
~'li'J-0
~
~
'7\1-0
WEST ELEVATION
~
"'".,.
_M
ELEVATIONS
SCALEtfS....-'..J1'
ARCADIA FITNESS CENTER
11)HOJmJF1B5TAV1!NU8 ~~ "006
OCTClBB.l1,2!m
~
~ ~~~~'.~},::~~:~ ~T:~~~-<:~';-_"~~'~4'_ _~_.__
~... . ,.. , ..""'0':<"'''''',-.'''..,..-.
- -,'"""'11"-_"",,", __'~ - .~
"
:(l" ,"A.::-_'-.;;;' C ~
-- ;;.::''":,'-.
A ~- "~_--i
.~
"
','" .- . _ _'~.. "_ ''=',"'b-.~__~
'- -' _ ._.;:,.o~\'!o~~~".t_,~~~_'I',. _~"... ~:ti~~...
~.. J.. ",.... - ~ ~""'~;r'$' T"" ~ .... 't'- ... ~ .-.. _
. --~'-~~.:~ ;:,~,~.;<< -"~....-:- -~.-" ;"'.',.- ~...:,:
'!- ...
!
,
....< ~
"
"
.'
f
. -.. "'~-::'E~ ~ ~~
_.r.t . '~~ ,'"
.,
:.. ~
.
'<
<:f:f~
. ," ._,
: :,:,,,:_~,,:-,'_:'t",
. J.-: .......5.. n
-~"._"t.,'::
'r- .:, _~.
, ~j..
-1-~c-,
r>
" :~"';.~.--";'4L: G", ~
. ... .- ~ ~ .ft;'r
'__-1'" ~ _ . ___
. ,- - ;;...~~."~.~r"
- ,,'. ...;.
'\~""~",.~...'f _~.
: \"'--"~ . !::r;..-'
"r' ~.~_~~~;
<I ';4'
1",_'-,/~.~~..,
cC --ici-~i_! ,- .:$'
'"
-...- ~
'- ,
~~_:~~:>~jJ
d ~-?~
'';~ -!;'.
-.-...
;"+".
. If--- "'!Io.j ~
'--~.-'
~ .
.~ '" --::
\ ,:
~ , \.oi'" ~
;~r-.-~ ',;-~ ~. J- :, ~ ..,!-
~~ ':,~~~I'" r.''::.
--,' ,. - -- ,
~-~. . , ~~~,;'~~.f
[:':',~)~:r,". ,.~f:i- " ;.~
.' - -' '.;f"
...~Jt~~:.
._ _ ~~_:~.;,l\-~.:r{~S?L~
,.r_ ..r~_../'~I'-"'r .. ._~
. ",~ -.'ttji.;." -~ ~. . -.. ~;f...1", - ','
-- Q ,:-_ ~ =1:0-1, ,. , l_F '?~-
.~.' .
~ c. '....
y"; >-'
,
, .
,
'..~ .
-, , ..... ,''''...
'-"'/(.:.:6.;~'~~!:~}":,:,~_ .:
~ ~,~.!"'''~ "~" ".,.-~ol'
,~.,.. "..,..f; .~... ' l' j;~,. >;J _ , ......
'" ~ cro~.:" . - ~::_ .~...,.~. ". '"'"
'.
,
"'.~'f .'
, .
'.
:-.'
,
,"'.
.~ ~
: ...~.<- ~.
-f't."/"
. .~..~
_vo\~.~. 1;
~"~; '.
.....:. ~..
".
_' ~'t"
~.
~ j.o ~-~
;"
.'
t.'},...,
:,...
!'~"
,
.....;;,...
~.
~-
"
~,,,, .-
"-:-'-.. :..
"'
,
. .
?~. :.
'.
's, ."
..
"..,
'10..'
."...J~
'd:
,-
~ "
~ . ~.
"
..
"
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
,