HomeMy WebLinkAbout1735
RESOLUTION NO. 1735
.
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
2005-16 AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW
NO. 2005-19 FOR AUTOMOBILE SERVICE
GARAGES AT 28 W. LIVE OAK A VENUE
WHEREAS, on September 6, 2005, a conditional use permit
application was filed by Robert H. Daggett, architect, to construct
automobile service garages (Development Services Department Case No.
CUP 2005-16 and ADR 2005-19) at property commonly known as 28 W.
Live Oak A venue; and
.1
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Planning Commission
on October 25, 2005, at which time all interested persons were given full
opportunity to be heard and to present evidence.
NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ARCADIA RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
That the factual data submitted by the
Development Services Department in the attached report is true and correct.
SECTION 2.
This Commission finds:
I. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not be
. detrimental to the public health or welfare, or injurious to the property or
improvements in such zone or vicinity because the initial study did not
. disclose any substantial adverse effects to the area affected by the proposed
project.
2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is a proper one
for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized.
3. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate said use. All yards, spaces, walls, fences, loading,
landscaping and other features including the shared parking with the
neighboring business, are adequate to adjust said use with the land and uses
in the neighborhood. The proposed project complies with all related zoning
requirements as set forth in the Arcadia Municipal Code.
4. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and
pavement type to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use.
5. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not
adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan because the land use and
.
current zoning are consistent with the General Plan.
6. That the use applied for will not have a substantial adverse impact
on the environment, and that based upon the record as a whole there is no
evidence that the proposed project will have any potential for an adverse
effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends.
..
2
1735
SECTION 3. That for the foregoing reasons this Commission
. grants Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 2005-16, for automobile service
garages at 28 W. Live Oak Avenue, upon the following conditions:
I. That the owner of the subject property, as servient tenement,
shall provide on the subject property a driveway easement to ensure that
adequate ingress and egress will be provided for the neighboring property at
36 West Live Oak Avenue, as benefited tenement. Such easement shall be
in a form and substance approved by the City Attorney and shall be
recorded in the Office of the Los Angeles County Recorder, together with
subordinations thereto executed by owners of all interests in the subject
property that could ripen into a fee interest. Said easement shall become
.
nun and void upon the removal of all or part of the existing building at 36
West Live Oak Avenue, or any change in the location of any part of the
footprint of such building.
2. The parapet on the front elevation shall have a 5'-0" deep
return.
3. That all chain-link fencing be removed.
4. "No parking" signs shall be posted along the easement at the
rear of the property, subject to the review and approval of the Community
Development Administrator.
.
3
1735
5. "No overnight parking" SIgnS shall be posted along the
. westerly block wall, subject to the review and approval of the Community
Development Administrator.
6. A 6'-0" high decorative block wall shall be installed along the
rear property line and westerly property line, except in the front setback and
the easement area. Such wall shall be subject to the review and approval of
the Community Development Administrator.
7. The trash enclosure shall be relocated to the planter area
labeled "L 7" on the submitted plans, and shall meet the minimum
dimensions required by the Code, subject to the approval of the Community
Development Administrator.
.
8. The operating hours of the service garages shall be limited to
7:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m., seven days a week.
9. A final landscape plan shall be submitted for the plan check
process, subject to the approval of the Community Development
Administrator.
10. That all lights shall comply with City standards, including
shielding and height requirements.
11.
The parking spaces shall be double-striped per City standards.
.
4
1735
12. The use approved by CUP 2005-16 is limited to the automobile
. service garages. The automobile service garages shall be operated and
maintained in a manner that is consistent with the proposal and plans
submitted and approved for CUP 2005-16.
13. A separate sign design review application shall be submitted
for all new signs on the premises. Signs for the individual units shall only
be permitted on the awning valance.
14. All conditions of approval shall be complied with prior to
opening the automobile service garages. Noncompliance with the plans,
provisions and conditions of approval for CUP 2005-16 shall be grounds for
immediate suspension or revocation of any approvals, which could result in
the closing of the automobile service garages.
.~
15. All City code requirements regarding accessibility, fire
protection, occupancy, and safety shall be complied with to the satisfaction
of Building Services and the Fire Department.
16. Approval of CUP 2005-16 shall not take effect until the
property owner(s), and applicants have executed and filed the Acceptance
Form available from the Development Services Department to indicate
awareness and acceptance ofthese.conditioDs of approval.
.
5
1735
.
.
.
17. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the
City of Arcadia and its officers, employees, and agents from and against any
claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Arcadia, its officers,
employees or agents to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or
condition of approval of the City of Arcadia concerning this project and/or
land use decision, including but not limited to any approval or condition of
approval of the City Council, Planning Commission, or City Staff, which
action is brought within the time period provided for in Government Code
Section 66499.37 or other provision of law applicable to this project or
decision, The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action,
or proceeding concerning the project and/or land use decision and the City
shall cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. The City reserves the
right, at its own option, to choose its own attorney to represent the City, its
officers, employees, and agents in the defense of the matter.
18. There shall be no auto body shop permitted.
SECTION 4. The decision, findings and conditions contained in
this Resolution reflect the Commission's action of October 25,2005, by the
following votes:
6
1735
.
..
.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners Baderian, Hsu, Olson
none
Commissioners Lucas, Wen
SECTION 5.
The Secretary shaIl certify to the
adoption of this Resolution and shaIl cause a copy to be forwarded to the
City Council of the City of Arcadia.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the forgoing Resolution was adopted at a
regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the November 8, 2005,
by the foIlowing votes:
AYES:
NOES:
Commissioners Baderian, Hsu, Lucas, Olson, Wen
none
Chairman, PI ing Commission
City of ArcadIa
GJ:11~
Secretary, Planning Commission
City of Arcadia
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~P.~
Stephen P. Deitsch, City Attorney
7
1735
!
STAFF REPORT
Development Services Department
October 25, 2005
TO: Arcadia City Planning Commission
FROM: Donna L. Butler, Community Development Administratpr
By: Thomas P. Li, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Application No. CUP 2005-16 and Architectural
Design Review No. ADR 200&-19 for an automobile service garage at
28 W. Live Oak Avenue
..
SUMMARY
The subject Conditional Use Permit and Architectural Design Review applications
were submitted by the architect, Robert H. Daggett, to construct an automobile
service garage at 28 W. Live Oak Avenue. The Development Services Department
is recommending approval of the applications subject to the conditions as set forth in
this report.
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Robert H. Daggett (architect)
LOCATION: 28 W. Live Oak Avenue
REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Architectural Design Review
(ADR) to construct an automobile service garage.
SITE AREA: 22,791 sq. ft. (0.52 acre)
FRONTAGES: Approximately 80 feet along Live Oak Avenue
.
.~
4D
.
n
EXISTING LAND USE & ZONING:
The site Is currently improved with a vacated self-service coin-
operated car wash building constructed in 1978 and a parking area
in the rear. The zoning is CoM (Commercial Manufacturing).
SURROUNDING LAND USES & ZONING:
No rt h : Commercial Center - zoned C-2
South: Multiple-family Resldential- Temple City
E a s t: Tutoring Center - zoned CoM
We s t: Vacant Office and Warehouse bldg. - zoned C-M
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial
BACKGROUND
A self-service coin-operated car wash building, constructed in 1978, occupies the
front half of the subject property. The rear portion of the property is separated from
the front by a solid block wall and was utilized as a parking area by the property to
the west and has a driveway accessing the property to the east.
This project was originally scheduled for the October 11th Planning Commission
meeting; However, staff requested a continuance because of unforeseen vehicular
access issues that involve the two adjacent neighboring properties to the east and
west.
A carpet company occupied the vacant property to the west, at 36 W. Live Oak
Avenue, until December 2003. With only a twelve-foot wide driveway accessing the
rear parking area, the carpet company was utilizing the rear portion of the subject
property to access a 20'-0" wide driveway easement that runs along the property line
between the subject property and the property to the east at 22 W. Live Oak Avenue
(see attachment). However, there was no written agreement for the carpet company
to use the subject property for such access since the same person owned both
properties for an extended period of time.
The original proposal would have blocked access to the driveway easement and
create a potentially hazardous fire access situation for the property to the west. Staff
has since met with the applicant to discuss this matter, and they have agreed to
provide an easement for the property to the west.
PROPOSAL AND ANALYSIS
The proposal is to demolish the existing structure on the property and construct an
8,118 sq.ft. automobile service garage that would provide eight tenant spaces, with a
total of eighteen (18) service bays. The service hours wili be determined by the
CUP 2005-16 & ADR2005:19
October 25,2005
Pace 2
..
..
.
.I
,
I
\
individual tenants: but staff suggests to limit the hours to 7:30 a.m. to 7:30 p.m., due
to abutting residential properties to the south of the site.
The adjacent property to the east is a tutoring center. The operator of the school is
concerned about potential traffic. that may be generated by the auto service garage;
specifically, they are concerned about the use of the recorded driveway easement
that is mostly on their property. Staff feels that the easement would not be heavily
used, since the proposed driveway on the subject property would accommodate two-
way traffic. Furthermore, the applicant has the legal rights to use that easement.
The applicant is proposing to install a trash enclosure adjacent to the rear property
line, as shown on the submitted site plan. However, in accordance with applicable
zoning requirements, it must comply with a minimum building setback of 20'-0". Staff
suggests to relocate the enclosure to the planter area labeled "LT on the submitted
site plan. Such an enclosure shall comply with the minimum dimensions required by
the City (8'x10' or 5'x14') and shall be finished to match the proposed building.
An automobile service garage is a permitted use in the CoM zone with an approved
conditional use permit.
Parkina
By Code, an 8,118 sq.ft. automobile service garage is required to provide 16 on-site
parking spaces (2 spaces per 1,000 sq.ft. of gross floor area). The proposed service
center has twenty-four (24) on-site open parking spaces. In addition, the 18 service
bays would accommodate another 18 automobiles, but they will not be striped as
required per Code.
From experience with other similar establishments, the non-permitted on-site storage
of vehicles takes up many ofthe parking spaces. By posting signs prohibiting vehicle
storage, and limiting the type of auto service allowed, staff feels that there would be
adequate parking for the proposed auto service garage.
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW
In conjunction with the Conditional Use Permit, the Planning Commission may
approve, conditionally approve, or deny the applicant's .architectural design. The
proposed building provides architectural features to achieve proper massing and
architectural relief. Staff feels, however, that the parapet on the front elevation
should have a 5'.0" deep return to create a more substantial appearance.
Furthermore, the cornice should be carned through the entire front fagade, and the
driveway area should be enhanced with colored interlocking pavers. In staffs
opinion, the proposed building would be consistent with the City's design criteria
provided that the above revisions were made.
A separate Design Review would be required prior to installing any new exterior
signs on the building or property. Since this proposal is considered an industrial use,
CUP 2005-16 & ADR 2005=19
October 25,2005
PAnA:'!
..
the maximum allowable signage would be limited to one square foot for each two
lineal feet of building frontage. Therefore, with a 33'-0" building frontage, the
allowable wall signage for proposed building shall be limited to a maximum of 16.5
sq.ft. The applicant indicated that there is no designated wall sign area above the
bays because there would not be individual wall signs for each unit other than the
suite numbers. Therefore, staff suggests limiting wall signs to the .sign panel" area
as shown on the submitted plans; and that the individual identification signs should
be limited to the valance of the awning.
CODE REQUIREMENTS
All City requirements regarding disabled access and facilities, occupancy limits,
building safety, health code compliance, parking and site design shall be complied
with to the satisfaction of the Building Official, Community Development
Administrator, Fire Marshall, and Public Works Services Director,.
CEQA
.
Pursuant to the provISions of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act, the
Development Services Department has prepared an Initial Study for the proposed
project. Said Initial Study did not disclose any substantial or potentially substantial
adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the
project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise and objects of
historical or aesthetic significance that could not be made less than significant with
mitigation incorporation. When considering the record as a whole, there is no
evidence that the proposed project will have any potential for adverse effect on
wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Therefore, a
Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project. .
FINDINGS
Section 9275.1.2 of the Arcadia Municipal Code requires that for a Conditional Use
Permit to be granted, it must be found that all of the following prerequisite conditions
can be satisfied:
1. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the
public health or welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such
zone or vicinity.
2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is properly one for which a
Conditional Use Permit is authorized.
3. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate said use, and all yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking, loading,
landscaping, and other features required to adjust said use with the land and
uses in the neighborhood.
.
CUP 2005-16 & ADR 2005-19
October 25,2005
Page ~
:~';':,~_. "
I: ~ J;
I' :c~. ~)7
~~~c t, ;::
:~~r.
.
,
. - I"_.J.
.....~,.~ "-'
.
4. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and pavement
type to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use.
5. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the
comprehensive General Plan.
RECOMMENDATION
The Development Services Department recommends approval of Conditional Use
Permit Application No. CUP 2005-16 and ADR 2005-19, subject to the fOllowing
conditions:
1. That the subject property shall provide a driveway easement to ensure that
adequate ingress and egress will be provided for the neighboring property at
36 East Live Oak Avenue, subject to the review and approval of the City
Attomey, and that said easement shall become null and void upon the
removal or alteration of the existing building footprint at 36 East Live Oak
Avenue.
.
2. The parapet on the front elevation shall have a 5'-0" deep return.
3. That all chain-link fencing be removed.
4. "No parking" signs shall be posted along the easement at the rear of the
property, subject to the review and approval of the Community Development
Administrator.
5. "No overnight parking" signs shall be posted along the westerly block wall,
subject to the review and approval of the Community Development
Administrator.
6. A 6'-0" high decorative block wall shall be installed along the rear property line
and westerly property line, except in the front setback and the easement area.
Such wall shall be subject to the review and approval of the Community
Development Administrator.
7. The trash enclosure shall be relocated to the planter area labeled "L7" on the
submitted plans, and shall meet the minimum dimensions required by the
Code, subject to the approval of the Community Development Administrator.
8. The operating hours of the service garages shall be limited to 7:30 a.m. to
7:30 p.m., seven days a week.
9. A final landscape plan shall be submitted for tlie plan check process; SUbject
to the approval of the Community DevelopmentAdministrator.
.
-
CUP 2005-16 & ADR 2005-19
October 25,2005
Page 5
.
10. That all lights shall comply with City standards, including shielding and height
requirements.
11. The parking spaces shall be double-striped per City standards.
12.The use approved by CUP 2005-16 is limited to the automobile seNice
garage. The automobile seNice garage shall be operated and maintained in a
manner that is consistent with the proposal and plans submitted and approved
for CUP 2005-16.
41
13. A separate sign design review application shall be submitted for all new signs
on the premises. Signs for the indiVidual units shall only be permitted on the
awning valance.
14.A11 conditions of approval shall be complied with prior to opening the
automobile seNice garage. Noncompliance with the plans, provisions and
conditions of approval for CUP 2005-16 shall be grounds for immediate
suspension or revocation of any approvals, which could result in the closing of
the automobile s.eNice garage.
15.AII City code requirements regarding accessibility, fire protection, occupancy,
and safety shall be complied with to the satisfaction of Building SeNices and
the Fire Department.
16.Approval of CUP 2005-16 shall not take effect until the property owner(s), and
applicants have executed and filed the Acceptance Form available from the
Development SeNices Department to indicate awareness and acceptance of
these conditions of approval.
17.The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Arcadia
and its officers, employees, and agents from and against any claim, action, or
proceeding against the City of Arcadia, its officers, employees or agents to
attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or condition of approval of the
City of Arcadia concerning this project and/or land use decision, including but
not limited to any approval or condition of approval of the City Council,
Planning Commission, or City Staff, which action is brought within the time
period provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37 or other provision
of law applicable to this project or decision. The City shall promptly notify the
applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding concerning the project and/or
land use decision and' the City shall cooperate fully in the defense of the
matter. The City reseNes the right, at its own option, to choose its own
attomey to represent the City, its officers, employees, and agents In the
defense of the matter.
e.
CUP 2005-16 & ADR 2005-19
October 25,2005
Page'S
'.
..
.
4D
.
.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Approval
The Planning Commission should move to approve Conditional Use Permit
Application No. CUP 2005.16 and Architectural Design Review No. ADR 2005.
19, file the Negative Declaration, and direct staff to prepare a resolution to
approve CUP 2005-16 for an automobile service garage at 28 W. Live Oak
Avenue
Denial
If the Planning Commission intends to deny this Conditional Use Permit application.
the Commission should state the specific reasons for denial and direct staff to
prepare the appropriate resolution incorporatin'g the Commission's decision and
specific findings.
If any Planning Commissioner, or other interested pa~ has any questions or
comments regarding this matter prior to the October 25 public hearing, please
contact Thomas Li at (626) 574-5447.
APP~ .
D~ B,,:f-ezt: =
Community Development Administrator
Attachments: Floor and Site plans
Vicinity Map & Aerial Photograph with Zoning Information
Environmental Documents
Description of the Easement
~
CUP 2005-16 & ADR 2005-19
October 25,2005
Page 7
UVEOAee
-----
SIOEW,lUJ(
----
l't,
I \
,
i
r-J-
._~~~htel
U>/ITA
1,700 .f
J Lto
UNITS
917 If
""'TC
'17~
l'
."'4'
-,
!
~:
I
..
~
S
VHlrP
"7 IF
u
VNlrs
'17 ff
:18
UIrlJr P
1J.1 ,r
UUlrCi
tit iof
1-
'A'l SITE PLAN
!'d
WIlIdows Doo,
ELEVATION
B
ELEVATION atNorth '/0'
i
,
1---
IO~ ItU"
PMf(l)lp?
RGQ.;JP
Sw.ISltuUar
(typI
.
c
ELEVATION atWest yj
i
m-'-'
, u~-l:]
ELEVATION atEast
~/~
GQOHAiIIdI
~llypl
""'""-
-\
\
I
..-.
..,
stucconwer
"""
f_tGl'-.n
/ ...... .~...
I
,
,.
't
, "
cr-:~
~~
~r=-e_.~ "'-=-o..~
lQIl'n.st...._ -U'1ll::'!I
c......T'1IQ'~JlO\A.-l
'~lr.:I'_I~
~ ""=<,
AAtIl$T.l41il'-O'.l.l
Z2.N'~_
co
<"
"..
-
~...
'.7),,'1
~'I:I.n
~....
,...,.
--"
...... r_
"'"
-
'"*btl;r (J"'.mIllU
con..
"-"
fu>::I.o!l~"lI-
--
~~e-..p.
~~
--
"
"
""
Lr.1.l/
"
'W
!
lD~
......,
~r
:.-.ws___llol:z:l_1
6<n,_./6ot1
"...
14)J7:J""'..........
"'-=
"'-"
ell....-.~
.Jt.A""""'lal
117""",,_
lW""",._
1~1~~.111\c\
.
""TAAHCE ~42~ I
!
I
r"
: t
I ~
:i
: ~
I
f-"+
,
I!
:,
(
p.
I
I
~~
2+ UNIT Il I
.'1 sf
""L7~ I :
f-t ~OCo'i ::;' +: 58'0' t..4 ~
t~-_.__.__u--lj
~ C SUO'eeI
.. ----
(nflllfn8j
"swCCOOI/,t
c:~___
.
D ELEVATION at South K1
"j ..'~' }
;y ~
~i+(~' .....~ "'J-
8 - 811= '1
" . (,t.J
-.
-
F SECTION from South It..
.
.
.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Approval
The Planning Commission should move to approve Conditional Use Permit
Application No. CUP 2005-16 and Architectural Design Review No. ADR 2005-
19, file the Negative Declaration, and direct staff to prepare a resolution to
approve CUP 2005.16 for an automobile service garage at 28 W. Live Oak
Avenue
Denial
If the Planning Commission intends to deny this Conditional Use Permit application,
the Commission should state the specific reasons for denial and direct staff to
prepare the appropriate resolution incorporating the Commission's decision and
specific findings.
If any Planning Commissioner, or other interested pa~ has any questions or
comments regarding this matter prior to the October 25 public hearing, please
contact Thomas Li at (626) 574-5447.
Donna L. Butler
Community Development Administrator
Attachments: Floor and Site plans
Vicinity Map & Aerial Photograph with Zoning Information
Environmental Documents
Description of the Easement
CUP 2005-16 & ADR 2005-19
October 25,2005
Page 7
I
.....
..
~..W.u..o._.M:IlI:ltICAI1lllI
l.~ T<a;l1I1GIl9S
c:.n..TC:O:<lttGl;,1
IbItln;I rla:llUlte ltlI$!
~-,
,,",~I"1l:U
1'2.701_"1
...
'"
-
-
"'...
U1,n.ll
.UIJ.':Z
uve._
--"'-----
--
SIDEW.\LK
~"'!lI....
-.
--
SdIoo;b r_'
-
-
~==
-
80.13 fad
'~._-
- "'<'!
I
It
I \
I
! ----..!.
.
I
I
I
PLAN
,,-
u_
N-
:.tl7i5_lO>IIlIl>w~
..'11......_
,,,.
--..--
--
-~-
----
-
...........
---
U
.,
""
".Uo
Uo
'"
UNITA
1,700 ff
...m...._
"'-"
510.........
..-..
"'_...
1I7,.....~
1lO8.......
11SQ__cNi_I1:111o
'.
l
Q
E
i
"
I
bt
i~
\ =
~LS
!
I
I
~~
I
UNITH I
117 5f
"L7 :
it' =:;;. '<<1'8' - "'Q~~'
. ~TM, - is
~..4-____.____....J
;X c........... 8O.Ollfoa.
(u&Ill1G)
i Uo
umra
917'"
...n-o
'17."
"
."-:'"
I
~
!,
I
B ELEVAllONatNorth '/a'
VHltP
'17 sF
~
:
,.
1--
..
I
.,
,
VNlrE
,,, If
-
--,
,lJ1>l
--
LanIem (lnil
lSO".w
PIe-r(IJpl_
I
"
!
fi;l'~.._.... -. .
.....
". !---
,18
UI,1Ir P
fill ~
I j
,
. i
IJHlrli
'17 fof
C ELEV A llONal West y~'
o ELEV A lION at South
..
:.. ;.
I
rn-- '-,
: .. ............-Jr:]
t 'J,t.'.o. }-
~ ~
{~{~~ NN~~{
....
-
..........
-\
.
rc1I=-:'~
-~
\
A C:ITJ: DI /l,'1IJ
1= C:::l:'rTln"-l .....__ .._._.....
1=1 FVATION at Easl
1/..'
,(,-
_I 100
I
I
I
I
~
N
f I'
r. I
.
" 1
"
o 100
200_ ~
.Di 4\' '
"'6". , .tP;p, .'
" ' '- ,",,~4j ,,'f II ,~'
",. '.-,..... p{
~ --,. - '
.
~
~
~
,'i _
.
, r '
'~-->CJ'
~ 28 W Live Oak Ave
D Arcadia
~ Zone
1?s
~f8 W tUW'(f) (Q)~1k A W'~lTDlUJe
rcflJP roJ~o~(5
~V8lopment Se1vIces Deparlnient
Engineering DMsion
.
-- (2Q6)
~ o::t
(lBttJ ~
:E
N o::t
00 0 100 200 Feet ~
~- , @]
~
lD) ~
i.4s rUM (J3)
(2lI)
~s IJ~ (f~ Ill) /5J L1'
(14)
LIVE OAK AVE.
~
(f~
fU)
(~
(l6)
f'OI
~
t-
t;
'Z
o
']>
~
CoM
I C-M I
1fs
28 W Live Oak A venue
CUP 05-16
Development Services Depertment
Engineering DMsion
Prepa/ed by. RS,GDIltIllo1. Se/>I8mIw. zoos
.
.~
CD
File No.: CUP 2005-16
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 W. HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
**DRAFT**
A. Name, if any, and a brief description of the project:
Conditional Use Permit Application No. CUP 2005-16 to construct an automobile service garage.
B. Location of Project:
28 W. Uve Oak Avenue
In the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles
C. Name of Applicant, Sponsor or Person Undertaking Project:
A.
-2L B.
Other (Private)
(1) Name
(2) Address
Robert H. Daooett
1512 Avenlda Verde Vista. Suite 200. San Dimas. CA 91773
The Planning Commission 0 City Council 0, having reviewed the Initial Study of this proposed project
and having reviewed the written comments received prior to the public meeting of the Planning
Commission/City Council, including the recommendalton of the City's staff, does hereby find and declare
that the proposed project'will not have a siginificant effect on the environment. A brief statement of the
reasons supporting the Planning Commlsslon'slCity Council's findings are as follows:
The City Council 0 Planning Commission 0, hereby finds that the Negative Declaration reflects Its
Independent judgement. A copy of the Initial Study may be obtained at:
Community Development Division
City of Arcadia
240 W. Huntington Dr.
Arcadia, CA 91007
(626) 574-5423
The location and custodian of the documents and any other material which constiture the record of
proceedings upon which the City based its decision to adopt this Negative Declartion are as follows:
Community Development Division
City of Arcadia
240 W. Huntington Dr.
Arcadia, CA 91007
(626) 574-5423
Oate:
Oate Received for filing
Staff
Form "E"
4/03
.
4t
File No. CUP 2005-16
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. Project Title:
Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 2005-16
2. Project Address (Location)
28 W. Live Oak Avenue
3. Project Sponsor's Name, Address & Telephone Number:
Robelt H. Daggett, AlA
1512 Avenida Verde Vista, Suite 200,
San Dimas, CA 91775
(626) 339-6200
4. Lead Agency Name & Address:
City of Arcadia - Development Services Depaltment
Community Development Division - Planning Services
240 \tv. Huntington Drive
Post Office Box 60021
Arcadia, CA 91066-8021
5. Lead Agency Contact Person & Telephone Number:
Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator (626) 574-5442
6. General Plan DeSignation: Commercial
7. Zoning Classification: CoM
8. Description of Project:
(Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the
project and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its
implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to construct an automobile service garage.
.
CEOAEnv. Checklist Part 1
-i.
4/03
.
.
.
File No. CUP 2005-16
9. Surrounding land Uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the project's
surroundings.)
North:
South:
East:
West:
Commercial Center- zoned C-2
Muftiple-family Residential- Temple City
Tutoring Center - zoned CoM
Vacant Office and Warehouse bldg. - zoned CoM
10. Other public agencies whose approval Is required (e.g., permits, financing
approval, or participation agreement):
The City Building Services, Engineering Division, Fire Marshall, Public Worl<s
Services, and Water Services will review the construction plans for the tenant
improvements for compliance with all applicable construction and safety codes
and will oversee construction and installation of any necessary infrastructure or
improvements on-site and/or within and along the public right-of-way. The tenant
improvements for the coffee shop will also be reviewed by the Los Angeles
County Health Department for compliance with local health codes.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIAllY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this
project, involving at least one impact that is a .Potentially Significant Impact" as
indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
,
[ 1 Aesthetics
[ I Biological Resources
. [ I Geology/Soils
[ ] HydrologylWater Quality
[ I Mineral Resources
[ ] Population & Housing
[ ] Recreation
[ I Utilities and Service Systems
[ ] Mandatory Findings of Significance
[ ] Air Quality
[ I Cultural Resources
[ 1 Hazards & Hazardous Materials
[ ] land Use & Planning
[ ] Noise
[ 1 Public Services
[ ] Transportation / Circulation
DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
[Xl 'I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
,
CECA Env, Checklist Part 1
-2-
4/03
.
.
.
)
File No. CUP 2005-16
[] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the
mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the
project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[] I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
[] I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
but that at least one effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document
pursuant to applicable legal standards and has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on that earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, and if
any remaining effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially
Significant Unless Mitigated: an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required, but it only needs to analyze the effects that have not yet been
addressed.
[] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all
potentially significant effects have been analyzed adequately in an earlier
Environmental Impact Report pursuant to applicable standards and have been
avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation
measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
~~-~ ~
Signature
October 3. 2005
Date
Thomas Li
Printed Name
For
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are
adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses
following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced
information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects such as the one
involved (e.g., the project is not within a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should
be explained where it Is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards
(e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a pfoject-
specific screening analysis).
CEOA Env. Checklist Part 1
-3-
4/03
File No. CUP 2005-16
2. All answers must take account of the whole action Involved, including off-site as well as on-
site, cumula~ive as well as pfoject-Ievel, indirect as well as direct, and construction related
. as well as operational impacts.
3. "Potentially Significant Impacf is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect
is significant. If there are one or more, "Potentially Significant Impacf entries when the
determination is made, an Environmental Impact Report is required.
4. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of
mitigation measures has reduced an effect ffOm "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less
Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and
briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation
measures from Section 17 "Eaflier Analyses" may be cfoss-referenced).
5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program Environmental
Impact Report, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an
earlier EIR or Negative Declaration {Section 15063(c)(3)(D)}. Elilrlier analyses are
discussed in Section 17 at the end of the checklist.
a) Earlier Analyses Used: Identify and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were
within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and state whether suc/:l effects were addressed by
mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
4. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation
Measures Incorporated; describe the mitigation measures that were incorporated or
refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific
conditions fOf the project.
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate Into the checklist, references to information
sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ofdinances). Reference to a
previously pfepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to
the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7. Supporting Information SOUfceS. A source list should be attached, and other sources used
or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8. The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) The significance criteria Of threshold, If any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) The mitigation measure Identified, If any, to reduce the impact to less than significant.
.
CEOA Env. Checknst Part 1
-4-
4/03
File No.: CUP 2005-16
Less Than
. Polentlally Slgnlflcant Less Than
Significant With Slgnlflcant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporatlon
1. AESTHETICS - Would the project
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0 0 0 ~
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited 0 0 [j 181
to, trees, rock outcropplngs, and historic buildings within a state
scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of 0 0 0 181
the site and Its surroundings?
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would 0 0 0 181
adversely affect day Of nighttime views in the area?
The proposed automobile seNice garage wUf be constructed according to the City's design criterfas to
complement the surrounding development and will not heve any of the above impacts.
.. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES - In determining whether Impacts
to agriculture resources are significant environmental effects, lead
agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation
and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the Callfomia
Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assesSing
impacts on egriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of 0 0 0 ~
Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (The
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program In the Callfomia
Resources Agency to non-agricultural use?
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson 0 0 0 181
Act contract?
c) Involve other changes In the existing environment which, due to
their location or nature, could result In conversion of Farmland to
non,agricultural use?
o
o
o
181
3.
The proposed au/omobi/e seNice garage is in a fully developedaraa and wi/I not have any of the above
impacts.
AIR QUALITY . Where available, the sigrilflcance criteria
established by the appilcable air quality management or air
pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following
.
CEOA Checklist
5
4-03
.
.
.
determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct Implementation of the applicable alf
quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
c) Result In a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria
pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including
releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors)7
e) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
f) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of
people?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
File No.: CUP 2005-16
Less Than
Significant
WlIh
MlUgation
Incorporation
o
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
No
Impact
~
~
~
~
~.
The proposed automobile service garage will be in a fully developed arae. Because the proposed use is subject
to applicable air quality regulations as admlnistared by tha South Coast Air Quality Management District, it will
not have any of the above impacts.
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through
habitat modifications, on sny species Identlfied ss a candldete,
sensitive, or special status species in locsl or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural community Identified in local or regional plans,
policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands
es defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (inClUding but
not limited to , marsh, vemal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological interruption Of other means?
CECA Checklist
6
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
~
~
~
4-03
File No.: CUP 2005-16
Less Than
~ Potentially Significant Less Than
Slgnlficant With Significant No
Impact MllIgallon Impact Impact
Incorporation
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or 0 0 0 1&1
migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery
s~es?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances proteCting biological 0 0 0 1&1
resources, such as a'tree preservation polley or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation 0 0 0 ~
Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved
local, regional or state habitat conservation plan?
The proposed automobile service garage will be in afuliy developed aree and will not have any of the above
Impacts.
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the Significance of a 0 0 0 ~
historical resource as defined In li 15064.5?
. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an 0 0 0 181
archaeological resource pursuant toli 15064.5?
c) Dlrectiy Of Indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or 0 0 0 ~
site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturtl any human remains, including those interred outside of 0 0 0 181
formal cemeteries?
The proposed automobile service'garage will be In a fully developed area and will not have any of the above
Impacts.
6. GEOLOGY AND SOtLS - Would the project:
a) Expose people Of structures to potential substantial adverse 0 0 0 181
effects, Including the risk of loss, injury, Of death involving:
I) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the 0 0 0 181
most fecent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
Issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
.
CEOA Checklist 7 4-03
File No.: CUP 2005-16
Less Than
. potentially Slgnlflcant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mltigallon Impact Impact
Incorporallon
II) Strong seismic ground shaking? 0 0 0 ~
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, Including liquefaction? 0 0 0 ~
v) landslides? 0 0 0 ~
b) Result In substantial soli erosion or the loss of topsoil? 0 0 0 ~
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soli that is unstable, or that would 0 0 0 ~
become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result
In on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soli as defined in Table 18-1-B of the 0 0 0 121
Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or
. property?
e) Have solis incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic 0 0 0 ~
tanks or al\emative waste water disposal systems where sewers
are not available fOf the disposal of waste water?
The proposed eutomobile seNlce gerage will be In e fully developed eree. The subject locetion has not been
determined to be especially susceptible to-any of the ebove geOlogic problems end is not within e Seismic
Hazard Aree identified by the Seismic Hazard Mepping Act. The proposal does not Include any excavation,
grading or filling. No unique geologic features have been identified at the site. The project Is connected to the
local sewer system. The project will not heve eny of/he ebove impects.
7. VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the
project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment 0 0 ~ 0
through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
b) C~eate a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials Into the
environment?
o
o
o
~
.
CEQA Checklist
8
4-03
File No.: CUP 2005-16
Less Than
. Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant WIIh Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
c) emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely 0 0 0 121
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which Is Included on a list of hazardous 0 0 0 ~
materials sites compiled pursuant to Govemment Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would It create a sIgnificant hazard to
the public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where 0 0 0 ~
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project result In a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the 0 0 0 181
project result in a safety hazard for people resldins or working In
the project area?
. g) Impair implementation of or physically Interfere with an adopted 0 0 0 ~
emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a sigificant risk of loss, Injury or 0 0 0 121
death Involving wildland fires, Including where wildlands are
adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed
with wildlands?
The proposed automobile service garage will require routine transport forhaZ8rcious materials extracted from
vehicles. However, the number of trips will be minima/and willnot have significant Impacts. They will also be
subject to NPDESrequirements.
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the project:
a) Substentlally deplete groundwater supplies or interfere 0 0 0 181
substantially with groundwater recharge such ihat there would be
a net deficit In aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level (I.e., the production rate of pre-existing
nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been
granted)?
b) SUbstentialiy alter the existing drainage pattem of the site or area, 0 0 0 181
Including through the elteration of the course of a stream or river,
. In a manner which would result In substantial erosion or siltation
CEQA Checklist 9 4-03
File No,: CUP 2005-16
Less Than
. PolenU811y Significant Lese Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact MItigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
on- or off-site?
c) substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the site or area, 0 0 0 ~
Including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,
or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a
manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site?
d) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity 0 0 0 ~
of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide
substantial additlonal sources of polluted runoff?
e) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality 0 0 0 ~
f) Violate any other water quality standafds or waste discharge 0 0 0 ~
requirements?
. g) Place housing within e 100-year flood hazard area, as mapped on 0 0 0 ~
a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or
other flood hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede 0 0 0 ~
or redirect flood flows?
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, Injury or 0 0 0 ~
death Involving flooding, Including flooding as a result of the
failure of a levee or dam?
j) Expose people or structures to Inundation by seiche, tsunami or 0 0 0 ~
mudflow?
k) During project construction, will It create or contribute runoff water 0 0 0 ~
that would violate any water quality standards or waste dischrage
requirements, including the terms of the City's municipal separate
stromwater sewer system persmlt?
I) After the project Is completed, will it create or contribute runoff 0 0 0 ~
water that would violate any water quality standards or waste
dischrage requirements, Including the terms of the City's
. municipal separate stormwater sewer system permit?
CEQA Checklist 10 4-03
File No.: CUP 2005-16
.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
m Allow polluted stormwater runoff from delivery areas or loading 0 0 0 121
) docks or other areas where materials are stored, vehicles or
equipment are fueled or maintained, waste is handled, or
hazardous materials are handled or delivered, or other outdoor
work areas, to impair other waters?
n) Potential for discharge of stormwater to cause significant harm on 0 0 0 181
the biological integrity of the waterways and water bodies
including municipal and comestlc supply, water contact or non-
contact recreation and groundwater recharge?
0) Dischrage stormwater sothat significant harm Is caused to the 0 0 0 ~
biological integrity of waterways or water bodies?
p) Significantly aller the flow velocity Of volume of storm water runoff 0 0 0 ~
that can use environmental harm?
. q) Significantly Increase erosion, either on or off-stie? 0 0 0 ~
The proposed eufomoblleservice garage will be In a fully developed area. The proposed use will be subject to
Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality standards or waste discharge requirements; The proposal
will not alter ebsorption rates, drainage pattems, surface runoff, surface water conditions, or ground water
conditions. The site is within the Sante Anita Dam Inundation Area, buf will nol expose people to any additional
or increased hazard levels. The project will not have eny of the above impacts.
9. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community? 0 0 0 181
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of 0 0 0 181
an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not
limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or
zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural 0 0 0 ~
community conservation plan?
The proposed aufomobile service garage will be in a fully developed area and will not have any of the above
. Impacts.
CEQA Checklist 11 4-03
.
10. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project:
a) Result In the loss of availability of a known minerai resource that
would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
o
o
File No:: CUP 2005-16
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
No
Impact
I8J
~
b) Result In the loss of availability of a locally-Important minerai
resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan or other lend use plan?
The proposed automobile service garage will be in a fully developed area and will not have any of the above
Impacts.
11. NOISE - Would the project result In:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation ot' noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
.
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome
vibration or groundbome nolsa levels?
c) A substantial permanent Increase in ambient noise levels in the
pfoject vicinity above levels existing without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic Increase in ambient noise
levels In the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a pUblic
airport or public use airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
~
I8J
o
o
~
121
o
o
~
~
The proposed automobile service garege would likely generete noise from the tools and equipment used to
service eutomobiles. However, they would be subject to the City's noise ordinance.
12. POPULATION AND HOUSING . Would the project:
. a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for
CEQA Checklist
12
o
o
o
I8J
4-03
.
example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or Indirectly
(for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Potentially
Slgn\ficanl
Impacl
o
o
File No.: CUP 2005-16
Less Than
Slgnificanl
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
o
o
Less Than
SIgnificant
Impact
o
o
No
impact
181
121
The proposed automobile service garage wUI be in a fully developed area and will not have any of the above
impacts.
13. Pt.JBLIC SERVICES - Would the project:
.
a) Result In substantial adverse physical Impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered govemmental facllilies, need
for new or physically altered govemmental facilities, l\1e
construction of which could cause significant environmental
Impacts, In ordef to maintain acceptable service ratios, response
times or other peiformance objectives for any of the public
services:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
'.
~
181
~
181
181
The proposed automobile service garage will be In a fully developed a/9a enq will not have any of the ebove
Impacts.
14. RECREATION - Would the project:
.
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or
other recreational, facllilies such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelereted?
b} Does the project include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational facilities which have an
edverse physical effect on the environment?
CEQA Checklist
13
o
D'
o
o
o
o
181
~
4-03
.
Potentially
Slgnfficanl
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
File No.: CUP 2005-16
Less Than
Slgnfficanl
Impact
No
Impact
The proposed automobileseNice garage will be in a fully developed araa and will/lot have any of the above
impacts.
15. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC - Would the project:
. d)
a)
Cause anlncrsase in traffic which Is substantial In relation to the
existing traffic load and capacity of tha street system. (I.e., result In
a substantial Increase In either the number of vehicle trips, the
volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at Intersections)?
b)
Exceed, either Individually or cumulatively, a level of service
standard established by the county congestion management
agency for designated roads or highways?
o
o
o
o
o
o.
o
o
o
181
c)
Result In a change In alf traffic pattems, including either an
increase In traffic levels or a change in location that results in
substantial safety risks?
o
181
Substantially Increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous Intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g., farm equipment)?
o
181
o
181
e) Result in inadequate emergency access? 0 0 0 181
f) Result in Inadequate parking capacity? 0 0 0 ~
g) Conflict with adopted policies, !llans or programs supporting 0 0 0 181
altematlve transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, biCYCle racks)?
The proposed eutomoblle service garage will be in a fully developed area a/ldwill not have any of the above
impacts.
16. UTILITIES AND SERVlCESYSTEMS , Would the project:
.
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable
Regional Water Quality Controt Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater
treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
CEOA Checklist
14
o
o
o
o
o
181
o
181
4-03
File No.: CUP 2005-16
Less Than
. PolenUal1y Significant Less Than
SIgnIfiCant Willi SignIficant No
Impact MIUgaUon Impact impact
Incorporation
c) Require or result In the construction of new storm water drainage 0 0 0 ~
facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from 0 0 0 ~
exlsting entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded
entitlements needed? In making this determination, the City shall
consider whether the project Is subject to the water supply
assessment requirements of Water Code Section 10910, at seq.
(SB 610), and the requirements of Govemment Code Section
664737 (SB221).
e) Result In a determination by the wastewater treatment provider 0 0 0 ~
which serves Of may serve the project determined that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in
addition to the provider's existing commitments?
. f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to 0 0 0 ~
accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state and local statues and regulations 0 0 0 ~
related to solid waste?
The proposed automobile service garage will be in a fully developed araa and will not have any of the above
impacts.
17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the 0 0 0 ~
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish Of wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or anlmel or eliminate important examples of
the mejor periods of Callfomia history or prehistory?
b Does the project have impacts that are Individually limited, but 0 0 0 [81
cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means
that the Incremental effects of a project are considerable when
viewed In connection with the effects of past projects, the effects
of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects )1
.
CEOA Checklist 15 4-03
.
.
.
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either direcOy or
IndirecdY?
File No.: CUP 2005-16
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
0 0 0 181
The proposed automobile service garage will be in a fully developed area and will not have any of the above
impacts.
CEaA Checklist
16
4-03
.
.
.
File No. CUf 05 ~ Ih
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
(626) 574-S40D
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
Date Filed: 5..'2&.-n5
Generallnforination
1. Name and address of developer or foject~"t...oo,: apr};'C()/t)f:
~~~AjA
--1 ~/f.. AN~ V12Xa'i StJ1f"e ''If>o
G~ ]2una6, GA ~1773
2. Addfess of project (Location):
Ze, ~"P-/ OaJt.. ~U.{>./
3. Name, addr~ss and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project:
~-bo"~J
~-u;, ...3?J9-1''2.00
4. List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this
project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies:
ea.m ~f)9J>ecau.t .
5. Zoning: c.'1-
6. General Plan Designation: eM
Proiect Description
7. Proposed use of site (project description):
1vJ~/~ fierI/tee {p..nJu-
8. Site Size: tz 1~t Sq. Ft. I "r; +- Acre(s)
I
. 9, Square footage;f; building:
A36A-sF
I
10. Numbef offioors of construction:
Otl~
11. Amount of off-street parking provided:
lli:m e.,
12. Proposed scheduling of project:
.
.
13. Associated projects:
none,
14. Anticipated incremental development:
nao.~..
"
15. If fesidential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or
rents, and type of household sizes expected:
--
16. If cornmercial, indicate the type, i.e. neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square
footage of sales area, and loading facilities, hours of operation:
r~ oneoteJ...; Y10\~~11 or:!!1l7a~JtJql';, 14.th.-W ~frn
17. Ifindustrfal, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities:
'.
--
18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estImatEid employment per shift, estimated
occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project:
-.
19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use permit, or zoning application, state this
and indicate clearly why the application is fequired:
S!~c; ell,f.
Env.ronlnfDForm
-2-
4/01
.
20. Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects? Discuss below all items
checked yes (attach adciitionalsheets as necessary).
YES NO
--
Cl )( 21. Change in existing f~atures of any hills, or substantIal alteration of ground
contours.
CJ 'Jill 22. Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public
lands or roads.
CJ )( 23. Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project
CJ )( 24. Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
CJ .. 25. Change in dust, ash, smoke. fumes or odors in vicinity.
CJ )( 26. Change in ground water quality Of quantJ1y, or alteration of existing drainage
patterns.
Cl .. 27. Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity.
CJ )i( 28. -Is site on filled land or on any slopes of 10 percent or more?
CJ Cl 29. Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances,
flammable or explosives .
Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police. fire, water,
sewage, ete.) .
Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas,
etc.)
Relationship to a larger project or series of projects
Has a prior environmental impact report been prepared for a program, plan,
polley or ordinance consistent with this project?
Cl Cl 34. If you answered YES to question no. 33, may this project cause significant
effects on the environment that wefe not examined in the prior EIR?
Environmental Settina . ..
. Cl )it 30.
1:1 )( 31.
CJ )q 32.
CJ )i 33.
.
35. Describe (on a separate sheet) the project site as it exists before the project, including
information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, any cultural, historical or
scenic aspects. Describe any. existing structures on the site, and the use of the
structures. Attach photographs of the site. (Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be
accepted.) .
En-AranlnfoForm
.3-
4/01
,
.
.
.
36. Describe (on a separate sheet) the surrounding properties. including infonmation on
plants, animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land uses
(residential, commercial, etc.), intel'1Sity of land use (one-family, apartment houses,
shops, department stores, etc,), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-backs,
rear yards, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will
be accepted. .
Certification
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the
data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the
facts, statements, and lnforrr.ation presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief. .
Date 5.!2S'.oS
1
'.
EnoJrcnlnfoForm
-4-
./0'
.
.
.
I,
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
PaQe 3. Question 29
A normal by-product of automotive repair is trace amounts of oil, grease and
gasoline. They are not explosive but could be considered toxic ifingested.
PaQe 3. Question 35
The existing site is paved and has a self-service car wash operation on it. This
structure will be demolished and replaced with the new building.
Topography is essentially flat.
Soil is assumed stable. It is almost totally covered with paving.
There are no plants of any consequence on the site.
There are no animals of any consequence inhabiting the site.
There afe no cultural or historical aspects to the site.
There are no scenic aspects to the site.
PaQe 3. Question 36
Across the street to the north is a one-story strip shopping center.
On the east are a Chinese school, an automobile service center, and a car wash.
All are single story,
On the west are an unoccupied single-story commercial building and another
single-story auto service center.
On the south, in Temple City, is a two-story apartment house.
There are no significant plants or native animals, nor cultural, historical or scenic
features.
Except for on-site parking, all surrounding business structures cover their
respective lots. There is nothing noteworthy about any of the surrounding
area.
~
.
COIlE 3592 /;ODE 3188
't 11.7. ...
4
'- 5 eLK.A
I
~. ((\...rz..~~1 '. 26_
30 29_
,..
. . '2
.tud.IV"
~
M..
~
w
~
..J
~l
""<>
~
~ WELLAND'
TRACT NO. 25132
.. ... "' ...
CONDOMINIUM
TRACT NO. 37528
-.- -.- ---
M.B. 971~8?-88
M. B. 6!;3-18-19
'Z:
CONDOMINIUM
TRACT NO. 43590
.. ... .... ..
M. B. 1089-72-73
TRACT NO. 10898
MB. 189-42-43'
CONDOMINIUM
TRACT NO. 29825
CONDOMINI~M
TRACT ~Q. ~3_0~0
M. B. 1255-69'-70
M. B.' 807-42
CONDOMINIUM
TRACT NQ 35027
.. . . . .. ..
M. B. 943 - 39 -40
'" ,
,
,
,
.
,
,
,
,
;Ilt
~!
:1
.~
,
,
,
,
.
"'.w.
,...
NOTES:
.
I
DETAIL
/>10 .sCALE
@
@
@
@
@
$
@
: PARCELl (FEE)
: PARCEL 2 (FEE)
: PARCLE 3 (EA.SEMENT)
: A 4' STRIP OF PUBUC UTIU17ES EASEMENT
@ 16368.233 O.R.
.1
: PUBUC UTIUTIESEASEMENT
@01108l1952 62470
: A 4' S7R1P -OF PUBUC UTIUTFS EASEMENT
@.16397-2270.R.
:.6' AND 2' STRIPS OF PlIHI.IC 1fl71J77;;S liASfoMCiN"J'
@37999-2420R
@ : A 1.25' S7'RlP OF INGRESS AND F.GRFSS
EASEMENT@0812011974613700.R.
Easements.and other matters depicted hereon are provided as a courtesy only and no representation is made as to the accuracy or
completeness thereof. The company assumes no liability for any loss occurring by reason of reliance thereon. It is recommended that a
survey be obtained from a licensed professional to determine actual locations.
.'
.
Branth:
101 East Glenoaks Blvd.
Glendale, CA 91207
(818) 476-4000
Fu (818) 500-8268
"
PRELIMINARY REPORT
Title Offiter:Cathv Lanl!e -12/rna
ORDER NO. 14045323-106
Ref. No: SANMAR
Design Escrow
128 E Huntington Dr
Arcadia, CA 91006
Attn.: KAY
Property Address:
28 WEST LIVE OAK AVENUE
~cadia, CA
APN: 8573-019-003
In response to .he above referenced. application for a policy,oftille insurance, this Company reports that,it is prepared to issue, or ~ause to-be isSued.
as of the date hereof, a Policy Or Policies of Tille Insurance describing the land and the,estate or interest therein hereinafter set fonh, insuring against
loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or, refenod to as an E.xceptlon herein or nol e~cluded from
coverage pursuanlto the printed Schedule.. Conditions and Stipulations of said Policy forms. The printed Exceptions and Exclusions from the
coverage of said Policy or Policies are set fonh.in Exhibit B anached.
Please read Ibe exceptIons SbaWD or referred to below aDd tbe Exceptions and Exclusioas set fortb ID Exhibit B of this report oarefuDy. Tbe
..cepdous aDd excluslous art meaat to provide you wIth Dotice of matters, wblcb are Dol covered UDder the terms of tbe title Insurance
policy aDd sbould be carefully cODsldered. .
It Is ImportaDt to note lbat this prellmiuary report Is Dot a written represeDlallon as'to Ibe cODdltloD of IItle and may nol list all lIeDs, defects,
aDd encumbraDc" affectIng title to the laDd, This repon (and any supplements hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the issuance
. a policy of tiUe insurance 3l1d no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title
surance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested.
The form of policy of title insurance contemplated by this report is:
CLT A Standard Policy issued' by First American Title Insurance Company
Dated as of January 7,2005 at 7:30 a.m.
The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this Report is:
A fee as to parcell, an easement as to parcel 2.
Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in:
SANMAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
The land referred to in this Report is situated in the State of Cali fomi a, County of Los Angeles and is described
as follows:
(See "Legal Description" Exhibit A attached)
.
BUYER'S COpy
.
.
.
i
,ge No.2
File No. 14045323-106
At the date hereof exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed exceptions and Exclusions
contained in said policy would be as follows:
1.
General and special taxes for the fiscal year 2005-2006, a lien not yet due or payable.
la. General and special taxes for the fiscal year 2004-2005, not yet delinquent.
First installment:
Second installment:
Code area:
A.P.No.:
$1,213.04, paid.
$1,213.02, open.
0003592.
8573-019-003
1 b. Second installment supplemental taxes for the fiscal year 2003-2004 assessed pursuant to
chapter 3.5 commencing with s~tion 75 of the California revenue and taxation code.
Second installment:
A.P.No.:
$210.08, not yet delinquent.
8573-019-003
lc. Second installment supplemental taxes for the fiscal year 200:4-2005 assessed pursuant to
chapter 3.5 commencing with section 75 of the California revenue and taxation code.
Second installment:
A.P.No.:
$2,612.10, not yet delinquent.
85.73-019-003
Id.
The lien of supplemental taxes, ifany, assessed pUrsuant to chapter 3.5 commencing with
section 75 of the California revenue and taxation code.
1 e. Assessments, for community facility districts, if any, affecting said land which may exist by
virtue of assessment maps or notices filed by said districts.
2. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not shown by the public records.
3. An easement for PUBLIC UTlLITIES and incidental purposes, recorded IN BOOK 16368,
PAGE 233 of Official Records.
Affects:
THE REAR 4 FEET
4. Covenants, conditions and restrictions, but deleting any covenant, condition or restriction
indicating a preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex,
handicap, familial status, or national origin to the extent such covenants, conditions and
restrictions violate 42 USC 3604( c), asset forth in the document above mentioned.
Said covenants, conditions and restrictions provide that a violation thereof shall not defeat nor
render invalid the lien of any mortgage or deed of trust made in good faith and for value.
.
.
.
\
.ge No.3
File No. 14045323-106
5. An easement for PUBLIC UTll..ITIES and incidental purposes, recorded JANUARY 8,1952
AS INSTRUMENT NO. 2470 of Official Records.
Affects:
THE SOUTHEJU, Y 6 FEET AND THE EASTERLY 6 FEET
6. An easement for PUBLIC'UTn..rrIES and incidental purposes, recorded IN BOOK 16397,
PAGE 227 of Official Records.
Affects:
THE REAR 4 FEET
7. Covenants, conditions and restrictions, but deleting any covenant, condition or restriction
indicating a preference, limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex,
handicap, familial status, or national origin. to the extent such covenants, conditions and
restrictions violate 42 USC 3604(c), as set forth in the document above mentioned.
8. An easement for POWER LINES aIid incidental purposes, recorded IN BOOK 3 7999, PAGE
242 of Official Records.
Affects:
THE WESTERLY 6 FEET AND THE SOUTHERLY 2 FEET OF THE
WESTERLY 40 FEET
9.
A Covenant and Agreement upon and subject to the terms and conditions therein
Executed by: HAMILTON STONE, MARIETTA B. STONE, LEO O. WILHELM, LOIS F.
WILHELM, HOMER O. DUERR, MARY A. DUERR AND THELMA FENELON.
In Favor of: THE CITY OF ARCADIA.
Recorded: JUNE 5, 1964 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 4782 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
Reference is made to said Document for full particulars.
10. An easement for INGRESS AND EGRESS AND DRNEW A Y PURPOSES and incidental
purposes, recorded AUGUST 20, 1974 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 1370 of Official Records.
Affects:
THE EASTERLY 1.25 FEET
.
.
.
ge No.4
File No. 14045323-106
II. A deed of trust to secure an original indebtedness'of$750,000.00, and any other amounts or
obligations secured thereby, recorded MAY 26, 2004 as instrument no. 04-1343633 ofOfiicial
Records.
Loan no.:
Dated:
Trustor:
Trustee:
Beneficiary:
(NOT SHOWN)
MAY 20, 2004
SANMAR L.P., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
CHICAGO TITLE COMPANY
LOS ANGELES NATIONAL BANK
Affects: the land and other property.
12. An assignment of RENTS recorded MAY 26, 2004 as instrument no. 04-1343634 of Official
Records, as ,additional security for the payment of the indebtedness secured by the deed of trust
recorded MAY 26,2004 as instrument no. 04-1343633 of Official Records.
13. Covenants, conditions and restrictions contained in an instrument, which instrument is
additional security for said deed of trust
Entitled:
HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES CERTIFICATE AND INDEMNITY
AGREEMENT
SANMAR LJ~., A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP AND
LOS ANGELES NATIONAL BANK
MAY 26, 2004 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 04-1343635 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS
Executed by:
Recorded:
Upon the recordation of a full reconveyance of said deed of trust, the covenants, conditions and
restrictions will have no further force or effect.
14. An inspection of said land has been ordered; upon its completion we will advise you of our
findings.
15. Rights of parties in possession of said land by reason of any unrecorded leases.
Please submit any such leases to this company for our examination.
.
.
.
A.
I
_ .ge No.5
File No. 14045323-106
REOUlREMENTS:
With respect to SANMAR LIMITED PARTNERSHlP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHlP:
A. That a certified copy of the Certificate of Limited Partnership (fonn LP-l) and any
amendments thereto (fonn LP-2) be recorded in the public records;
B. A full copy ofthe partnership agreement and any amendments;
C. Satisfactory evidence of the consent of a majority in interest of the limited partners to
the contemplated transaction;
D. Other requirements which the company may impose following its review of the
material required herein and other infonnation which the company may require.
.'
.
.
Je No.6
File No. 14045323-106
NOTES:
a.
This report does not reflect requests for notice of default, requests for notice of delinquency,
subsequent transfers of easements, and similar matters not gennane to the issuance of the
policy oftitle insurance anticipated hereunder.
b.
If this company is requested to disburse funds in connection with this transaction, Chapter 598
of 1989 Mandates of the California Insurance Code requires hold periods for checks" deposited
to escrow or sub':escrow accounts. Such periods vary depending upon the type of check and
anticipated methods of deposit should be discussed with the escrow officer.
c.
No endorsement issued in connection with the policy and relating to covenants, conditions or
restrictions provides coverage for environmental protection.
d.
Special recordings: Due to a severe budget shortfall; many cOlJ!lty recorders have announced
that severe limitations will be placed on the acceptance of "special recordings." .
e..
Homeowners association: if the property herein described is subject to membership in a
homeowners association, it will become necessary that we be furnished a written statement
from the said homeowners association of which said property is a member, which provides that
all liens, charges and/or assessments levied on said land have been paid. Said statement should
provide clearance up to and including the time of Closing. In order to avoid unnecessary delays
at the time of closing, we ask that you obtain and forward said statement at your earliest
convenience.
f. Demands: This company requires that all beneficiary demands be current at the time of closing.
If the demand has expired and a current demand cannot.be obtained it may be necessary to hold
money whether payoff is made based on verbal figures or an expired demand.
g. Line of credit payoffs: If any deed of trust herein secures a line of credit, we will require that
the account be frozen and closed and no additional advances be made to the borrower. If the
beneficiary is unwilling to freeze the account, we will require you submit to us all unused
checks, debit vouchers, and/or credit cards. associated with the loan along with a letter
(affidavit) signed by the trustor stating that no additional advances will be made under the
credit line. If neither of the above is possible, it will be necessary to hold any difference
between the demand balance and the maximum available credit.
h. Maps: The map attached hereto mayor may no~ be a survey of the land depicted thereon. You
should not rely uponit for any purpose other than orientation to the general location of the
parcel or parcels depicted. Investors Title Company expressly disclaims any liability for
alleged loss or damages which may result from reliance upon this map.
.
.
.
le No.7
File No. 14045323-106
i.
This report is preparatory to the issuance of an AL T A loan policy. We have no knowledge of
any fact which would preclude the issuance of the policy with CL T A endorsement forms 100
and 116 attached.
When issued, the CLTA endorsement form 116 will reference A COMMERCIAL BUILDING
Known as: 28 WEST LIVE OAK. AVENUE, City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles,
California.
j. According to the public records, there have been no deeds conveying the land described herein
within a period of twenty four months prior to the date of this report, except as follows:
A deed recorded MARCH 26, 2004 as instrument no. 04-1343631 of Official Records.
Executed by: THE EDWARD E. SIMPKINS LIVING TRUST DATED NOVEMBER
17,1987 AND LIVE OAK. CAR WASH, INC., A CALIFORNIA
CORPORATION
To: EDWARD E. SIMPKINS, TRUSTEE OF THE EDWARD E.
SIMPKINS, LIVING TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 17, 1987
A deed recorded MAY 26, 2004 as instrument no. 04- 1343632 of Official Records.
Executed by: EDWARD E. SIMPKINS, TRUSTEE OF THE EDWARD E.
SIMPKINS, LIVING TRUST DATED NOVEMBER 17, 1987
To: SANMAR LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED
PARTNERSHIP
k.
The premium for a policy of title insurance, ifissued, will be based on the short term rate.
.
.
.
. "f No. 14045323-106
Exhibit A
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
All that certain real property situate in the County ofLOS ANGELES, State ofCaJifomia, described as
follows:
PARCEL 1:
LOT 3 IN BLOCK "A" OF TRACT NO. 10898, IN THE CITY OF ARCADIA, COUNTY OF LOS
. ANGELES, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 189, PAGES 42 AND
43 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
PARCEL 2:
AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS, EGRESS AND DRNEW A Y PURPOSES OVER THE WESTERLY
18 75 FEET OF LOT 4 IN BLoCK "A" OF TRACT NO. 10898, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 189, PAGES 42 AND 43 OF MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
SAID COUNTY.
FOR THE TERM:AND UPON THE PROVISIONS OF THAT CERTAIN AGREEMENT RECORDED
JUNE 5, 1964 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 4782.
APN No: 8573-019-003