HomeMy WebLinkAbout1726 (2)
.
e
.
RESOLUTION NO. 1726
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
2005-05 AND ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW
NO. 2004-022 FOR AN AUTOMOBILE SERVICE
STATION WITH LUBRICATION SERVICE AT 3 E.
DUARTE ROAD
WHEREAS, on February 25, 2005, a conditional use permit
application was filed by Alex Gurski, project coordinator, to construct and
operate an automobile service station, engaging in the sale of motor fuels
with automobile lubrication service and a 210 sq. ft. convenience store
(Development Services Department Case No. CUP 2005-05 and ADR 2004-
022) at property commonly known as 3 E. Duarte Road; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on April 12, 2005, at which
time all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to
present evidence.
NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ARCADIA RESOL YES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
That the factual data submitted by the
Development Services Department in the attached report is true and correct.
SECTION 2.
This Commission finds:
.
e
1. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not be
detrimental to the public health or welfare, or injurious to the property or
improvements in such zone or vicinity because the initial study did not
disclose any substantial adverse effects to the area affected by-the proposed
project.
2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is a proper one
for which a Conditional Use Permit is authorized.
3. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate said use. All yards, spaces, walls, fences, loading,
landscaping and other features including the shared parking with the
neighboring business, are adequate to adjust said use with the land and uses
in the neighborhood. The proposed project complies with all related zoning
requirements as set forth in the Arcadia Municipal Code.
4. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and
pavement type to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use.
5. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not
adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan because the land use and
current zoning are consistent with the General Plan.
6. That the use applied for will not have a substantial adverse impact
. on the environment, and that based upon the record as a whole there is no
2
1726
. evidence that the proposed project will have any potential for an adverse
effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends.
SECTION 3. That for the foregoing reasons this Commission
grants Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 2005-05, for an automobile service
station with at 3 E. Duarte Road, upon the following conditions:
1. The use approved by CUP 2005-05 and ADR 2004-022 is limited
to the automobile service station. The service station shall be operated and
maintained in a manner that is consistent with the proposal and plans
e
submitted and approved for CUP 2005-05 and ADR 2004-022.
2. All regulations on automobile service stations pursuant to Arcadia
Municipal Code Section 9275.4 shall be complied with unless determined
otherwise under CUP 2005-05 and ADR 2004-022.
3. A minimum of two (2) 36" box specimen trees shall be planted in
the planter on the easterly portion of the property to screen the service bays,
subject to the review and approval of the Community Development
Administrator.
4. Switch the location between the trash enclosure and the parking
spaces by the northwesterly comer of the property, subject to the review and
approval of the Community Development Administrator.
.
3
1726
.
e
5. The monument sign shall be lowered to a maximum height of 8' -
0".
6. The wall sign on the northwest elevation shall be removed or
relocated, location subject to the review and approval of the Community
Development,Administrator.
7. The hours of operation shall be limited to Monday though Friday,
7:30 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., Saturday, 7:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Sunday, 8:00 a.m.
to 5:00 p.m. in the Summer (May 1st through Oct. 31st). And Monday
tbrough Saturday, 7:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m., Sunday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. in
the Winter (Nov. 1st through April 30th).
8. The maximum number of employees at anyone time cannot
exceed five (5).
9. All conditions of approval shall be complied with prior to opening
of the automobile service station. Noncompliance with the plans,
provisions and conditions of approval for CUP 2005-05 and ADR 2004-022
shall be grounds for immediate suspension or revocation of any approvals,
which could result in the closing of the service station.
10.All City code requirements regarding accessibility, fire protection,
occupancy, and safety shall be complied with to the satisfaction of Building
. Services and the Fire Department.
4
1726
.
e
.
II.Approval of CUP 2005-05 and ADR 2004-022 shall not take
effect until the property owner(s), and applicants have executed and filed
the Acceptance Form available from the Development Services Department
to indicate awareness and acceptance of these conditions of approval.
l2.The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City
of Arcadia and its officers, employees, and agents from and against any
claim, action, or proceeding against the City of Arcadia, its officers,
employees or agents to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or
condition of approval of the City of Arcadia concerning this project and/or
land use decision, including but not limited to any approval or condition of
approval of the City Council, Planning Commission, or City Staff, which
action is brought within the time period provided for in Government Code
Section 66499.37 or other provision of law applicable to this project or
decision. The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action,
or proceeding concerning the project and/or land use decision and the City
shall cooperate fully in the defense of the matter. The City reserves the
right, at its own option, to choose its own attorney to represent the City, its
officers, employees, and agents in the defense of the matter.
5
1726
.
e
.
13.That a "Right-turn only" sign shall be posted by each of the
proposed driveways, subject to the review and approval of the Community
Development Administrator.
SECTION 4.
The decision, findings and conditions contained in
this Resolution reflect the Commission's action of April 12, 2005, by the
following votes:
AYES:
NOES:
Commissioners Baderian, Lucas, Olson, Wen
Commissioner Hsu
SECTION 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this
Resolution and shall cause a copy to be forwarded to the City Council of the
City of Arcadia.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the forgoing Resolution was adopted at a
regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the April 26, 2005, by
the following votes:
A YES: Commissioners Baderian, Hsu, Lucas, Olson, Wen
NOES: None
Chairman, Planning
City of Arcadia
Secretary, Planning Commission
City of Arcadia
6
1726
.
e
.
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~P.~
Stephen P. Deitsch, City Attorney
7
1726
, .
.~
e
.
STAFF REPORT
Development Services Department
April 12,2005
TO: Arcadia City Planning Commission
FROM: Donna L. Butler, Community Development Administrator
By: Thomas P. Li, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Conditional Use Permit Application No. CUP 2005-05 and Architectural
Design Review No. ADR 2004-022 for an automobile servic;e station at
3 E. Duarte Road.
SUMMARY
The subject Conditional Use Permit and Architectural Design Review applications
were submitted by the project coordinator, Alex Gurski, to construct and operate an
automobile service station at 3 E. Duarte Road. The Development Services
Department is recommending denial of the applications because the proposed
building is inconsistent with the goals set forth in the architectural design guidelines.
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Alex Gurski (project coordinator)
LOCATION: 3 E. Duarte Road (also known as 916 S. Santa Anita Avenue)
REQUEST: A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) and Architectural Design Review
(ADR) to construct and operate an automobile service station,
engaging in the sale of motor fuels with automobile lubrication
service and a 210 sq.ft. convenience store.
SITE AREA: 13,456 sq. ft. (0.31 acre)
FRONTAGES: Approximately 152 feet along Duarte Road;
148 feet along Santa Anita Avenue
.
e
.
EXISTING LAND USE & ZONING:
The site is currently undeveloped, and is zoned C-2 General
Commercial.
SURROUNDING LAND USES & ZONING:
No rt h: Warehouse (non-conforming) - zoned C-2
South: Automobile SeNice Station - zoned C-2
E a s t: Tire SeNice Center (non-conforming) - zoned C-2
W est: Commercial Retail Center - zoned C-2
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial
BACKGROUND
The subject property was an automobileseNice station '(Shell seNice station) until it
closed in May of 2003. This former station had two seNice bays for minor seNicing
of vehicles and an automatic key-operated carwash bay. The structures, including
the fuel tanks, were removed and demolished by July 2003. The property has
remained vacant since that time.
PROPOSAL AND ANALYSIS
The proposal is to construct a.nd operate an automobile seNice station with four fuel
pumps, three seNice bays for automobile lubrication seNice, and an incidental 210
sq.ft. convenience store at the subject property.
There will be five employees at the peak employment period. The proposed hours
vary slightly between the summer and winter season; they are as follows:
Summer Hours
Monday through Friday
Saturday
Sunday
7:30 a.m. - 7:00 p.m.
7:30 a.m. - 6:00 p.m.
8:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
Winter Hours
Monday through Saturday 7:30 a.m. - 6:00 p.m.
Sunday 8:00a.m. - 5:00 p.m.
The applicant estimates about 43 trips per day for the lubrication seNice use, based
on current operations. The proposed use provides an equal number of fuel pumps
and islands as the previous use, therefore not increasing the number of trips
generated for the refueling of vehicles. The applicant estimates 122 trips per day for
the previous car wash, in addition to trips generated by the two seNice bays. In
CUP 2005-05 & ADR 2004-022
April 12, 2005
Page 2
.
e
.
staff's opinion, the proposed use would not generate more traffic than the previous
automobile service station.
An automobile service station is a permitted use in the C-2 zone with an approved
conditional use permit.
Parkinq
The proposed service station has six (6) on-site parking spaces. By Code, one
parking space is required for each employee in the peak employment period, plus
one additional for the convenience store; therefore, a maximum of five (5) employees
shall be permitted at anyone time.
The Code also requires that the backup area shall not occur in the first 20 feet from
the street right-of-way and a parking lot entrance or exit. However, this was a recent
change to the code and was not considered during the Architectural Design Review
process. If this project is approved, staff suggests a condition to switch the location
between the trash enclosure and the parking spaces by the northwesterly comer of
the property to comply with such a requirement.
Architectural Desiqn Review
The applicant describes the architectural design as a blend of Art Deco and
Traditional Red Brick styles, with lighting and decorative wrought iron work that is
representative of the Art Nouveau styles. The predominant materials used will be
aged red brick, wrought iron, glass mullions, red roof tile and light tile wainscoting.
In staffs opinion, the proposed style is reminiscent of an old firehouse, which is of
high aesthetic quality and would complement the red brick commercial retail building
to the west of the subject property, across Santa Anita Avenue.
The Arcadia Architectural Design Guidelines requires the design of the buildings to
show proper consideration for the visual effect of the development from view of the
public rights-of-way. With the udrive-thru" design of the service bays, the door panels
will remain open during the hours of operation; the open bays will remain visible from
Santa Anita Avenue and Duarte Road and would detract from the overall aesthetic
quality of the building. The more traditional layout of service bays where there are
only doors on one side of the building would be more desirable because screening
could be better achieved. It could also eliminate the open bays from facing the
street, resulting in a more appealing fa9ade than open service bays.
Siqns
The applicant is proposing one freestanding monument sign, two directional signs,
and three wall signs for the project.
CUP 2005-05 & ADR 2004-022
April 12, 2005
Page 3
.
The monument sign is a 10'-0" high intemally-iIluminated sign with push-through
lettering and an opaque background. Based on recently approved monument signs
approved on similar size sites and type of uses, the height should be reduced to 8'-0"
because it would satisfy the same advertising need while attaining a more
pedestrian-friendly scale.
The directional signs are consistent with the monument sign in their design and are
proposed at 3'-0", which meet the city's visibility standards.
The three wall signs proposed are intemally-iIluminated channel letters with a halo
effect. The two wall signs on the southwest and southeast elevation appear
integrated with the building. However, the one on the northwest elevation appears to
be wedged into a narrow area between the cornice and the roof of the adjacent
portion of the building. In staff's opinion, this wall sign should be removed or
relocated.
CODE REQUIREMENTS
All City requirements regarding disabled access and facilities, occupancy limits,
building safety, health code compliance, parking and site design shall be complied
with to the satisfaction of the Building Official, Community Development
Administrator, Fire Marshall, and Public Works Services Director.
e CEQA
Pursuant to the provIsions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the
Development Services Department has prepared an Initial Study for the proposed
project. Said Initial Study did not disclose any substantial or potentially substantial
adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the
project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise and objects of
historical or aesthetic significance that could not be made less than significant with
mitigation incorporation. When considering the record as a whole, there is no
evidence that the proposed project will have any potential for adverse effect on
wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Therefore, a
Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project.
FINDINGS
Section 9275.1.2 of the Arcadia Municipal Code requires that for a Conditional Use
Permit to be granted, it must be found that all of the following prerequisite conditions
can be satisfied:
.
1. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the
public health or welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such zone
or vicinity.
CUP 2005-05 & ADR 2004-022
April 12, 2005
Page 4
.
e
.
2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is properly one for which a
Conditional Use Permit is authorized.
3. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate said use, and all yards, spaces, walls, fences, parking, loading,
landscaping, and other features required to adjust said use with the land and
uses in the neighborhood.
4. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type
to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use.
5. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the
comprehensive General Plan.
Section 9275.4.2 of the Arcadia Municipal Code also states that the Planning
Commission shall not grant any Conditional Use Permit for a drive-in business such
as a service station unless it makes the following findings:
1. The proposed use complies with all requirements set forth for the issuance of a
Conditional Use Permit;
2. The proposed use will not substantially increase vehicular traffic on any street in
a residentially zoned district;
3. The proposed use will not lessen the suitability of any nearby commercially
zoned property for commercial use by interfering with pedestrian traffic;
4. The proposed use will not create increased traffic hazards to pedestrian when
located near a school, church, auditorium, theater or other place of assembly.
RECOMMENDATION
The Development Services Department recommends denial of Conditional Use
Permit Application No. CUP 2005-05 and Architectural Design Review Application
No. ADR 2004-022, based on the reason that this proposal does not fully comply
with the Architectural Design Guidelines.
If the Commission decides to approve the proposal, staff recommends the following
conditions:
1. The use approved by CUP 2005-05 and ADR 2004-022 is limited to the
automobile service station. The service station shall be operated and
maintained in a manner that is consistent with the proposal and plans
subm~ed and approved for CUP 2005-05 and ADR 2004-022.
CUP 2005-05 & ADR 2004-022
April 12, 2005
Page 5
.
e
I
2. All regulations on automobile service stations pursuant to Arcadia Municipal
Code Section 9275.4 shall be complied with unless determined otherwise
under CUP 2005-05 and ADR 2004-022.
3. A minimum of two (2) 36" box specimen trees shall be planted in the planter
on the easterly portion of the property to screen the service bays, subject to
the review and approval of the Community Development Administrator.
4. Switch the location between the trash enclosure and the parking spaces by
the northwesterly comer of the property, subject to the review and approval of
the Community Development Administrator.
5. The monument sign shall be lowered to a maximum height of 8'-0".
6. The wall sign on the northwest elevation shall be removed or relocated,
location subject to the review and approval of the Community Development
Administrator.
7. The hours of operation shall be limited to those listed in the staff report.
8. The maximum number of employees at anyone time cannot exceed five (5).
9. All conditions of approval shall be complied with prior to opening of the
automobile service station. Noncompliance with the plans, provisions and
conditions of approval for CUP 2005-05 and ADR 2004-022 shall be grounds
for immediate suspension or revocation of any approvals, which could result in
the closing of the service station.
10.AlI City code requirements regarding accessibility, fire protection, occupancy,
and safety shall be complied with to the satisfaction of Building Services and
the Fire Department.
11.Approval of CUP 2005-05 and ADR 2004-022 shall not take effect until the .
property owner(s), and applicants have executed and filed the Acceptance
Form available from the Development Services Department to indicate
awareness and acceptance of these conditions of approval.
12. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Arcadia
and its officers, employees, and agents from and against any claim, action, or
proceeding against the City of Arcadia, its officers, employees or agents to
attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or condition of approval of the
City of Arcadia concerning this project and/or land use decision, including but
not limited to any approval or condition of approval of the City Council,
Planning Commission, or City Staff, which action is brought within the time
period provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37 or other provision
of law applicable to this project or decision. The City shall promptly notify the
applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding concerning the project and/or
CUP 2005-05 & ADR 2004-022
April 12, 2005
Page 6
.
e
.
land use decision and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense of the
matter. The City reserves the right, at its own option, to choose its own
attorney to represent the City, its officers, employees, and agents in the
defense of the matter.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
.
Denial
The Planning Commission should move to deny Conditional Use Permit
Application No. CUP 200S.QS and Architectural Design Review No. ADR 2004-
022, and direct staff to prepare a resolution to deny CUP 2005-003 for an
automobile service station at 3 E. Duarte Road.
Approval
If the Planning Commission intends to approve these applications, the Commission
should state the specific reasons for approval and direct staff to prepare the
appropriate resolution incorporating the Commission's decision and specific findings.
If any Planning Commissioner. or other interested party has any questions or
comments regarding this matter prior to the April 12th public hearing, please contact
Associate Planner, Thomas Li at (626) 574-5447.
nna L. Butler
Community Development Administrator
Attachments: Vicinity Map, Aerial Photo with zoning information
Plans
Negative Declaration & Initial StUdy
CUP 200s..D5 & ADR 2004-022
April 12, 2005
Page 7
~
N
o
100
200 Feel
~ 3 E Duarte Rd
D Arcadia
~ Zone
'74h
~
3 E Duarte Road
CUP 2005-05
vefopmerrt SelVices Department
Engineering Division
~
100
,
N
o
100 Feet
.
---
(820) (15) (19) (25) (27) (3f) (33)
LUCILE ST
~ (30) (34)
(909)
~
~ (900)
(921) se
~
~ (33)
~
~ (25)
( ~
(15)
(1)
(19) (11) (26) (28)
DUARTE RD (26-112) (30)
1
(10)
(20) ~ (1000)
~
~
se
~
~
~
~ (23)
i~ 3 East Duarte Road
ve/opmenf Services Department CUP 2005-05
Engineering Division
red by: R.S,GcnzaIe, Apd/. 200S
e
~
,
,-1'
I ~,~~~.~.~.~ I
e
~
.
i~er'\'" ~:.~..,-:-
'-"-,...'/_~c'-: . '.
,,'
- .......,."....~ ...,.,..~.
.~.,.~
_....: ,i -~ .-
,~ ...
,J, ~_
EZ Lube
Arcadia, CA
~
~tdl
_....._~c..a
G
e
~
.." - -
-~
4'
-"/'\
-.r'" -''';P ":.
,,-'- -~~-
.~..'
.,
(' ~. .-.~-~~ r
,.,r
EZ Lube
Arcadia, CA
/ ~tdL
I~~~~~-~.~ I
---~.......
..
~
~
..
~ II
"
~l
I' II
~
OJ
-'
e
PROJECT DESCRIPTIDN
U5E ~-n4lUcn.ltL16EFAOUrr
"""'"
...".
~
.,.,
.\Po\: ~~~~
fWE.DFCOtcSll'UC1'ICff
"
S1TEAnE4- 21l!ll'ISF 11m
iIIJIlDNGFOOTPR:Nt 217UF. 'Oll.
l.ANO:StAPEAREA !iCl.!5SF 21"
PAveoAl'EA lU7BSF. 111lli
INTERIlIl~NEA22ll:5B.F.
JftoOFDllerroTAl..SlTEMEA) ,.~
1WwNa.' SSTANCNI). I He
LEGAl DESCRIPTION:
tRACfNl)101.lOTS3,.AAIOEXOFSTl.OTil
a'oa<,.PAQEGR!OSfJ1.[lG
itRl:)N)WlIIENt<<JOEIlC4lJON
...............""""
iZ RlGtfin.AHOM..YS!GN
a ~
-
JOB AOORESS;
aE.JJUAIlfEf'D.
AACAl)l,.l"CAtlOO1!o
I
I
I
I
/-T-......
/
/
'J
I
\
,
"
"-
.....--/
I
I \
L- -' - -;:..:.........""""'"
/
/
'"
,
TRASH ENCLOSURE DETAILS
Il
,;
I!UD
~
-
~
-
-
~.
OWNEflS!NFO.:
I.f'taIS,AAi?oICtd)NlO~1.n'El'I$
""YmSfAWll.\'TlIUST
AlllJfIESlII~W,'I'M'AAI""'VE
~C4910t1l
lELII2II-.&AG~
DU,t.R"~ ~OAD
-
20
.
..
SCALE: 1" = 40.00'
~
'5GOLIOnICIrI'Pl
-.......
MIt.~_llI
ew.Ja.1I1llT
llU.lb3.tlnl
h A -
--
-
.....
""-
........
-
""-
-
"
..
,
,
~
i:i
'"
~
i::
,,'
~I
~
[=--===~ I
_..._~_.._-~-
---.--
--:-==:---:=-::"
e
^
/~" .,
/ ~>
<~ /
<~/
v
,tIlTK ROAD
DU..~
SODtSEEDlNG NOTES
~='-----
::;:::~=~:.:.."'::~::-...""=".=;-
S~'=5::'::::~~==
~- ..~~----
~~~":~.::.=..'"=:::':.":::':"".;:::-
: ~~_...:.::: --.==--:--=-~
~."t:'""...:::.:..-:---"'- ~_._--
~~:==:::-5:-=~-::;W-
=::=..~=-=,::"-:':~~~'=:"
.__.._.......__,_.....__._ 0'"
=::::"'..;;;'-~~.._-_.__..
:::0------..--...------..--..-.
f"!!::____-::::;:..:.::..~_==_--
==.=-~--==;:.::._-
P Nl1 NG SCHEDULE:- ------ -
::""..:" .....
. . =- - - -
. . - - -
-- -
0 . -- - -
--
. . - -
. --.,- - --
. - - --
0 . - - --
. . -- - --
-
. - - .--
,I, -- I- ---
J>
25
~
.
SCALE: 1" = 40.00'
,.
15:
15oQDuaur-~
__no.
-...... .....
1Kt.7S3.7I7tT
....1ATmI T
t- 0 L_~
-
-
-
a-.
-
-
....-
-
1,
'"
~!
"!9:- ~
1:1"
~
3.E. OUARlE RD
ARCADIA. CA
"EVISKlNS
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0 Z
0 :3
0
0 D-
"''''''''''' W
D-
o STORE HUMBER c(
U
WOPROJECJ~ UJ
....WC_ C
z
L1 c(
.J
-
e
GENERAL NOTES:
'" ====~-;;-~=::..~:;;::-..;;:==
.. u__.__.--.
.. ____...___-.L.
--.-.._---_.~~
...'--~---,.....-----
_._~
.. _______._.D;I:I'_.-___..-.._
..---.......--------
-'"'.~~-_.....---._.
~_.__._--...~--
---.---....---..-.-
-...........-----.....-----
_H_
. KEYED NOTES'
~---- '1-------
.. ""4__.-...-....___.....__-.. ' . ---.--
----------_. ------
---....-.----....,-- . ::::...-..-----
_________..__ '_____trr...--
~______ __ - I _.~_..._
..,.~_._......_::a::.....:=;.:.",._. ~-_...__..-
---.-- --......-
L _.__............____w.;_. ........-.--
--. ----.--
--
. ===_..........-..._.4.___ I _
1_---,----
......---...-----
-..---
---,....-
_...___I'ft'"____
~-
--
------
------
---
r ='~~ l
ft-
....1/
11
I
""
r;;:;::""-'!!.O!b--
r::;;;:.--
&1-
.......
-
~
-~
-~
.
llil
.....
-
-
-
fiT
=--.
!:L.
E:~
~::;;:- ~ I
--nlII""~__
~-
.~
~
-::1
...~
--
A 1.0-01 ~JI!; ,f!j"" FUN
L
A1.o-02 IYlJ>!l!l!!..FUN
-
,
---
---
14.....__
~4~rs
--
--
--
~
~-
--
-
"'-
-
---
,. --.
lAIo ~
- rn
:I~
~~
IAI~
:IE-DuAnE lD
ARCAO!A,l.,.";;1
_.-
c
-
-
.. !lI!!!!!l!P...J!I__~__===--!P1:l
. --------
cr. ==:r,::-..=I:-:=.. .....
. =:.7'"-'=------
.~~
s
"...,.
-
At1-01 ..... ~
,
-
-
~
~1~rtn.,.
,
g~.'-..
.-
, ,
d)
&~
o
II
"
,
e
e
e
,
.
. " r----:::
I GB\':aW. NO._
- ~-
- .
~' - ,~ ~----~~
tSvi~.,.
-
-
-
.
-1I;;Jr--
A7.o-o1~FU1V-
FEXIlHE8:
~~
am~
c=o
1I/iIII~
......-
mnm::mI ~
=
~
IBII_ ~- ~
I:ft!r.lIitmMmI
IDII_-=--- a-=--
-
---
-
A7~1Il~"""""'"
L
"
c
.
a
~'5..
A7.1-01~nnv."."
A7._QRWAmr.I
L
e
,
--=0'
---~
~~."
,
..
'oq~
- -
~=
-
~I
d)
~~
OJ
00
~
....
":cl5
era.
~
!1
., =-0 l
~<
~~
MJ]
'i__.;;;;IIl!:ib.
-
-
'11-
...
FIIaIHE8:
~~
am~-=-
~iF"",,,~~)
iiiii~-."';- (Q ,~
'" -- "
- ... )
o 5
!T= .,)
~
-~
-~- it
- ~
A7.1 w
1l2lII~-
~~
c::::iJ.~ -
a::m cur --
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~
etIlI'Dt"'tI:'7Mn
a:m~
--
."
"
r . e -- "
tl'-d
~ ~ ;."".,.
.
.
I
I
I
t
A7 ~ 1It1I!I._
~ ~
..
A7.2-01 1IItl..,_ - 7.2-0311t11!1._
-
lllOl
,~
-
. >
10-'_ a..
- 0
~
A7.2o
"
r
.... r"LV
~
'" -
% -.......
i~ -
,~O
,~:iJ
~~
~~
G
"
V'DIIIIB
.dWilM! to-e"L
--
M......".,.
_l'mroJrIl EO-e" L
"""''IWl
~
e
" ,
~- ~ ---:1
0IIM:lW"~_
.0
,
_ _..._ 11M! IO-8'.LV
QIlIMlWIDt'1llD_
._.::::.~-~ -"=.
---------...,
~_..----_..
__~_____'rW' ,
-
.
,
..
( PROPOSED DIREC:T10NAL SIGN )
D
( PROPOSED MONUMENT SIGN )
II
..0=.:-..,..,
PROJECT LOCATiON: 3RD E. DUARTE RD. ARCADtA. CA 91006
IOIOL291HIlUJttQIUCH,CA9OIlJ6 .m.:(S62)I9J..772.5 .fAlt:(S62IS95-$.tU
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
i
'0 0 DUAlt..!!JlJ!!P.-.-
I ._-------
L .~_.-
.---
.
o ~
I
I
~
/$'
~
e
(PROPOSED WAtl S!G!'l.5)
^
//~""
/ "
/ >
/, /
< ~. /
"" /
" /
" /
V
PROPOSED DIRECTlONAL SIGN
ewE: DECEMBCR 29, 2004
SIGH lYPf: SITE PlAN
.........-
ACCCUNl'fltP.:1ll11ENlClSMAH
-
FILE NAME: EZ WU ARCADIASlIE PlAN 8
.
DPa:TN.-. t1CADLCClM
-
~I "'"
!'EGGED l'fb.I
"""""'".,,'"
3Il6'fHlCX$CA....u.cx
SHClIlT.........
"""'..."""'"
""'"""""
--
010_
G1OSlm'lNG .3730
9.tlCAt'WtE-
..."""
~~--1 I
.... "",,----.J
1I2'tHlEAOEDPftcaWl
"""""''''''''''''''''.......
-COHOU:ltlL LJ5ttDIWfH
GIOSl.H\'NG#J130
~
f'8!iOlfW..W
""''''''''''
"""'" """'"
... ...
--
""""'
""......SCIlf'N
HALO CHANNEL LETTERS
SIF INTElNAlLY IllUMINATED CHANNEllElTERS
SPECIFICATiONS:
LETTERS TO BE FABRICATED FROM .090 AlUMINUM, PAINTED WITH
MATTHEWS POLYURETHANE FINISH OVER PROTECTM: PRIMER UNDER
COAT.
COlOR DETAIlS:
EZlUBE. PAlNTEP TO MAlCH ROYAl BWE #.3p31).87 WITH ,Iff
WHITE OUTUNE. REl\J11NS TO BE PAINTED WI-UTE.
OIl DROP. PAlr-rlEO TO MATCH CARDiNAl RED #3630-53.
REl\J11NS TO BE PAlNTEP WHUE.
All CONSTRUCTiONS &. WIRING TO BE UL USIED API'ROVED
NEON GAS SYSTEM.
All COMPONENlS TO BE Ul USTED.
~
~
IlIlIlIC.meza1
PROJECT LOCAJION: 3RO E. DUAITtRD ARCAD&l, ~ 91006
alOE. 29lIt 1llDN8IUCH.CA9U1D6 -1R.: (S621 69S-7125 . fAX:1S62)5f6.6U4
SIGH ARfA: 18 SQ. FT.
1-
1
a,
~
e
"
'"
I. SCALE: 3132" = 1'.0.
7'-8 Iff
20'.0"
67'-9"
REAR EXTERIOR ELEVATION .1
........ """"'"
SIGN TYPE: MA10 CKANKB. LmERS
RLE NAME: EZ WSE ARCADIA RfAR ElEVAtION A
EMAll.: rN1MEONSlCiINQAOl.jXJM
.
DATE; DECEMBER 29. 2004
NXOI.IMT UP; IU1 HEN1QSIMN
--
SCAlE; 3/4" ~ 1'.Q"
'1
1
<;>
!il
1
.
e
, I
M
"'"
lfl'nmAMOf'ftOClJi)l,Q
""""'OOO>IEC1OlrnwE
PEGOEDt'fllOl,;
........,"""'"
3.l16"1HCX1.ElCN\l1AO(
SHClUIil..EFJl;'mlE
"""'...""""
"""'.....-
"'"""
G"_
G~"31.1O
""CAP"'"
11-USl!l>
.., ",..",..
OW<NaWlBl
-r'"
""'"""
"""-'Cl ""'"
... ...
""""""
""'"
.Il~lly,,'
"""""'"
"" ...... SCR!W
HALO CHANNEL LETTERS
20'-4"
10'.10'
S'f INTERNAllY ILWMINATED CHANNEL LElTEIlS
SPECIFICATIONS:
LElTEIlS 10 BE FABRICAJED FROM ,090 AlUMINUM. PAINTED WITH
MAllHEWS POLYURETHANE FINISH OVER PROlEClIVE PRIMER UNDER
COAT.
COLOR DETAIlS:
EZlUBE - PAINTED TO MATCH ROYAl BLUE #3630-87 WITH lIT
WHIlE OUTUNE. RETURNS TO BE PAINTED WHTTE.
Oil DROP - PAINTED TO MATCH CAADlNAl RED #3630.53.
RETURNS TO BE PAINTED WHITE.
All CONStRUCTIONS & WIRING TO BE UL USTED APPROVED
NEON GAS sYsTEM. '
~>
All COMPONENTS TO BE UL USTED.
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
43'-6" LEFT EXTERIOR ELEVATION
E
1DIIIuc.....
-
SCAlE: 'h" = 1'-{)"
~
PROJECT LOCAlION: 3RD E. DUARTERD ARCADIA. CA 91006
DAlE: DECEMBER 29. 2004
SIGN 1VPf: HAlO CHANNEl lETTERS FILE NAMl: & WBE ARCADIA lEFr REYAnON A
.
ACCOUNt'REI': IlU. KENIGSMAN EMAIl.:f1rfINroNStGN@AOt.COM
atl80 LmHst LOfIfG IEACH.CA9Qa06 .1EL:($62J5f5..7125 . f.a:{562J595-64U
--
-
e
.
f='1
.....
""""',.
...,.,."""""""
Y'6'lHCX.li)W(MQI:
""'"""""'"
.......""'''''''''''
""'" .....
"""""-
G"""
~ln.1O
II<<> '" woe
"'--
-.........
0WHl""'"
If'1'~Pf>ECONDU1'
S1RIlIGllCXll'lNEClQJ~Er.w.E
~
....."'"
"""'" """'"
"'" "'"
.........
.....
/118,SCllEWlIW
fOftN:CE5S
""""""SCIliW
HALO CHANNEL LFnERS
SIF INTERNAlLY illUMINATED CHANNEllETlEl1S
SPECIFICATlONS:
LEllEI1S TO BE FABRICATED FROM .090 AlUMINUM. PAINTED WITH
MATIHEWS POLYURETHANE FINISH OVER PROTECTIVE PRIMEl UNDER
COAl. .
COLOIl DETAIlS:
EZlUBE - PAINTED TO MATCH IlOYAl BUJE #3630-87 WITH ,lIT
WHITE OUIUNE. I1ETURNS TO BE PAlNTEO WHITE.
OIL DROP - PAlMED TO MATCH CARDiNAl RED #3630.53.
I1ETUI1NS 10 BE PAINTED WHITE.
~
M
All CONST1lUCTlONS & WIRING TO Bl' UL USTED APPRQVEO
NEON GAS SYSTEM.
L
All COMPONENTS TO BE UL LISTED,
~ SCAlE: 3/32" = 1'-1)"
67'.9'
FRONT EXTERIOR ELEVATION.I
E
1IIllIUC,llQ.aIllIJ
PROJECT lOCAl1ON; .sID Eo DlJARTBH) ARCADIA. CA 91006
llATeo DECEMBER 29. 2004
SIGN lYPE: HALO CHANNB. lEJTERS
FILE NAME: EZ WI! ARCADIA FROHI' EUVATION A
.
EMAll.: lHJNEONS5N8AOLCCM
JOIOI.2tTMstL0H8su.cw.CA9CI06 .m.: (562) &fS.1725 -FAX;(56Z)5f$-&tU
0EStGN8; SOlCHON
.accouNf lrEI'; IIU. KEJflGSMAH
--
SCAlE: '8 - 1'.()"
-T
~
~
.
-f -
--
'~~~~._'"_..~ ~,~ "'f~~~
:'uc;: =.- --
-
WU'IIJl'
--
--
-
--
~~
~~~1~
~ ,00 ~..~
~iXj "";r1'i
=m .,{;:/;
1t4
-.........
--
~~VlllJMlllWEOr.'iClt<<.MWfSlGN
~lON5: SlGNIOIE~RlOM~Nlf&)WI~PO.'IUlE1HAtE
fNSHO'IERPllClI!CMPIlMAIH)EIlCOAI.
FACES: iOel.or.o.qlMtUlol'MtHRWIa)OOlCQ'tIlHJIf'rf'l.$EOlitllIAClMICJIlASJt
AliECaDSI.1lf.CEVIN'11.OiEfU(fFOR<:c:FtlGlW'HlCS.
"""".."""
w.lJl&.I08ERmAlIlWE .36>>81 wntOJElMY.
oc. OROI'- TOE CAl/IJI:llW RW#J6>>&.! ViM'iGaltAr.
I'll1.CONSlIM:TlONS"WIlINalOlEl.L1lSIEO~H.OflOlm1C!Nlt.llt*S.
AU.~JOIlEILUSlEO.
Ii
~uc.ID_
PROJECf LOCAnON: 3RD E. r;tUARFERD ARCADIA. CA 91006
ACCCUHf IlEP; IlU. HENIGSMNt
3010 L 29fHSlI,.ONG IflCH. CAtoID6 .18.: (S62J &9s.n2S . fAX: (S62J t9S-NU
-
--
SCALE: lIT = ".()'
r-- ~.10" ------l
I r-- 8'-0" -----11
T=;=
~
;.,
"
EZ~LUBE
b
~
Q.
Ii,
DATE: OECEMBER 29, 2004
FIlE NAME: EZ WBIi ARCADIA MONUMENT B
.
SIGN TYPE: MONUMEHf SIGN
D!SlGNElt:1ClllfOH
EMAIl:1HDI!OUSlGl..-.........
e-
r- 3'~ -1
I i:-- ~---:-u
~
L ~:-:-_c;:'_,..~:_,::~::~__:cn
1
Z STEel PIPE
I/S"
4"X 1/4"X4"
BASE
E
nclI!uc.....CZIClIiIJ
PROJECt LOCAllON: 3RD E. DlJ.AImRDARCADIA" CA 91006
SDlOl.l91Mn lI*GIUCH,CA9OI06 -U1:1162) 5Q.772S .QX:I542J59$.$4U
ACCOUNf lID: ILl HQIiG$WIt
e
--
SCALE: 3/4" = I'~
4 SETS OF OlF lNiERNAllY ilLUMlNATEP DiRECi1Or-w.. SIGNS
SPECIACAllONS: CABINET 10 BE FABIlICAJED FIlOM .050 AlUMINUM.
PAlI'1TED WI MATIHEWS PQlYlJl1ETHANE FINISH OVER PROlECTM PIlIMER
UNDER COAl.
5-
'"
FACE. TO BE ,050 AWMINUM. COPY TO BE ROlIlED 0Ul WITH 1/2" PUSHED
THRU ACRYUC PlA5T1C. A SECOND SURFACE ROYAL BWE IIINVLQVERLAV.
COLOR DETAILS:
ENlER -10 BE 3M. #363[).87 ROVAL BLUE VINYL
AAROW. 10 BE 3M. #3630.53 CARolNAi. RED VlNVl..
BASE . 10 HAVE BRICK VENEER.
ALL CON511lUC11ONS 8< WIRING 10 SE Ul.. lISTED APPROVEO NEON GAS SYSTEM.
AlL COMPONENTS 10 BE UL LISTED,
i'n
-"'"'"
.....--
l>>U~M.llt4
DAtE: DK:EMIER 29, 2004
SIGN 1YPE: DIIECTJONAI. SIGH
FILE NAME:.EZ W8E ARCADIA DlIECTlONAl B
.
0ESlGHU:1OIGION
DoWL:tNTNrOllSl~rlf.-<:'OM
.
e
I
File No.: CUP 2005-05
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 W. HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
**DRAF"""
A. Name, if any, and a brief description of the project:
Conditional Use Permit Application No. CUP 2005-05 to construct and operete an automobile service
station, engaging in the sale of motor fuels with automobile lubrication servicE; and a 210 sq.ft.
convenience store.
B. Location of Project:
3 E. Duarle Road
III the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles
C. Name of Applicant, Sponsor or Person Undertaking Project:
__A.
.JL B. Other (Private)
(1) Name Alex Gurski. WD Parlners
(2) Address 15420 Lacuna Canvon Road #270. Irvine. CA 92618
The Planning Commission 0 City Council 0, having reviewed the Initial Study of this proposed project
and having reviewed the written comments received prior to the public meeting of the Planning
Commission/Clly Council, inclUding the recommendalton of the City's staff, does hereby find and declare
that the proposed project will not have a siginificant effect on the environment. A brief statement of the
reasons supporting the Planning Commission's/City Council's findings are as follows:
The City Council 0 Planning Commission 0, hereby finds that the Negative Declaration reflects its
independent judgement. A copy of the Initial Study may be obtained at:
Community Development Division
City of Arcadia
240 W. Huntington Dr.
Arcadia, CA 91007
(626) 574-5423
The location and custodian of the documents and any other materia' which conslilure the record of
proceedings upon which the City based its decision to adopt this Negative Declartion are as follows:
Community Development Division
City of Arcadia
240 W. Huntington Dr.
Arcadia, CA 91007
(626) 574-5423
'IHakA<;. Lt
Staff
Date: MnlZt.LC'1 , .'l.9tf'7
Date Received for filing
Form"f;"
4/03
File No. CUP 2005-05
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. Project Title:
Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 2005-05
2. Project Address (Location)
3 E. Duarte Road
3. PI'oject Sponsor's Name, Address & Telephone Number:
Alex Gurski,
WD Partners,
15420 Laguna Canyon Road #270
Irvine, CA 92618
(949) 307-3658
e
4. Lead Agency Name & Address:
City of Arcadia - Development Services Department
Community Development Division - Planning Services
240 W. Huntington Drive
Post Office Box 60021
Arcadia, CA 91066-6021
5. Lead Agency Contact Person & Telephone Number:
Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator (626) 574-5442
6, General Plan Designation: Commercial
7. Zoning Classification: C-2
8. Description of Project:
(Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the
project and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its
implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary.)
.
CEOA Env. Checklist Part 1
-1-
4/03
.
e
I
File No. CUP 2005-05
A Conditional Use Permit (CUP) to construct and operate an automobile service
station, engaging in the sale of motor fuels with incidental automobile lubrication
service and a 210 sq.ft. convenience store. .
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting:
surroundings.)
(Briefly describe the project's
North:
South:
East:
West:
Warehouse (non-conforming) - zoned C-2
Automobile Service Station - zoned C-2
Tire Service Center (non-conforming) - zoned C-2
Commercial Retail Center- zoned C-2
10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing
approval, or participation agreement):
The City Building Services, Engineering Division, Fire Marshall, Public Works
Services, and Water Services will review the construction plans for the tenant
improvements for compliance with all applicable construction and safety codes
and will oversee construction and installation of any necessary infrastructure or
improvements on-site and/or within and along the public right-of-way. The tenant
improvements for the coffee shop will also be reviewed by the Los Angeles
County Health Department for compliance with local health codes.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this
project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as
indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
[ ] Aesthetics
[ ] Biological Resources
[ ] GeologylSoils
[ ] HydrologylWater Quality
[ ] Mineral Resources
[ ], Population & Housing
[ ] Recreation
[ ] Utilities and Service Systems
[ ] Mandatory Findings of Significance
[ ] Air Quality
[ ] Cultural Resources
[ ] Hazards & Hazardous Materials
[ ] Land Use & Planning
[ ] Noise
[ ] Public Services
[ ] Transportation I Circulation
DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
CEQA Env. Checklist Part 1
-2-
4/03
.
e
I
File No. CUP 2005-05
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[] I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the
mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the
project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[Xl
[l I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
[l I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
but that at least one effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document
pursuant to applicable legal standards and has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on that earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, and if
any remaining effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially
Significant Unless Mitigated," an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required, but it only needs to analyze the effects that have not yet been
addressed.
[ ]
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all
potentially significant effects have been analyzed adequately in an earlier
Environmental Impact Report pursuant to applicable standards and have been
avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation
measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
4t;~~ .- c,'
-::-6- /
Signature
March 3. 2005
Date
Thomas Li
Printed Name
For
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are
adequately supported by the infonmation sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses
following each question. A "No Impact" answer is adequately supported if the referenced
information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects such as the one
involved (e.g., the project is not within a fault rupture zone). A "No Impact" answer should
be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as general standards
CEQA Env. Checklist Part 1
,-3.
4/03
.
e
I
File No. CUP 2005-05
(e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-
specific screening analysis).
2.
All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-
site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction related
as well as operational impacts.
3.
"Potentially Significant Impact" is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect
is significant. If there are one or more, "Potentially Significant Impact" entries when the
determination is made, an Environmental Impact Report is required.
4.
"Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of
mitigation measures has reduced an effect from "Potentially Significant Impact" to a "Less
Than Significant Impact." The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and
briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigation
measures from Section 17 "Earlier Analyses" may be cross-referenced).
5.
Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program Environmental
Impact Report, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an
earlier EIR or Negative Declaration {Section 15063(c)(3)(D)}. Earlier analyses are
discussed in Section 17 at the end of the checklist.
a) Earlier Analyses Used: Identify and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were
within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to
applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by
mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation
Measures Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures that were incorporated or
refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific
conditions for the project.
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist, references to information
sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a
previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to
the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
7. Supporting Information Sources. A source list should be attached, and other sources used
or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8. The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) The mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant.
CEQA Env. Checklist Part 1
-4-
4/03
.
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air
quality plan?
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an
exi,ting or projected air quality violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria
pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including
releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors)?
e) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
ef)
Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of
people?
Potentially
Significant
impact
o
0,
o
o
o
File No.: CUP 2005-005
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
o
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
No
Impact
[gj
[gj
[gj
lZJ
[gj
The proposed service station will be in a fully developed area. Because the proposed use is subject to
applicable air quality regulations as administered by the South Coast Air Quality Management District, it will not
have eny of the above Impacts.
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse impact, either directly or through
hallitat modifications, on C!ny species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,
policies, or regulations, or by the Califomia Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substantial adverse Impact on any riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural community identified in iocal or regional plans,
policies, and regulations or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands
as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including but
not limited to , marsh, vemal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological interruption or other means?
I d) Interfere substantially.with the movement of any native resident or
CEQA Checklist
6
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
[gj
[gj
[gj
[gj
4-03
.
eb)
.
migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery
sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Confiict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation
Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved
local, regional or state habitat conservation plan?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
o
o
File No.: CUP 2005-005
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
No
Impact
[gj
[gj
The proposed service station will be in a fully developed area and will not have any of the above impacts.
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a)
Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a
historical resource as defined in ~ 15064.5?
Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
archaeological resource pursuant to ~ 15064.5?
c)
Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or
site or unique geologic feature?
d)
Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of
formal cemeteries?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
18I
[gj
181
[gj
ThG proposed service station will be in a fully developed area and will not have any of the above impacts.
6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the project:
a) Expose peopie or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the
most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
iI) Strong seismic ground shaking?
CEOA Checklist
7
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
181
[gj
[gj
4-03
.
e e)
iii) Selsmic.related ground failure, Including liquefaction?
v) Landslides?
b)
Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
c)
Be located on a geOlogic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would
become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result
In on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
d)
Be located on expansive soil as defined in Table 18-1-B of the
Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or
prqperty?
Polantially
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
o
File No.: CUP 2005-005
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Inccirporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
[gj
[gj
[gj
[gj
181
[gj
Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic
tanks or altemative waste water disposal systems where sewers
arEl not available for the disposal of waste water?
Theproposed service station will be in e fully developed area. The subject loca~on has not been determined
to be especially susceptible to any of the above geologic problems and is not within a Seismic Hazard Area
identified by the Seismic Hazard Mapping Act. The proposal does not include any excavation, grading or filling.
No unique geologic features have been identified at the site. The project is connected to the local sewer
system. The project will not have any of the above Impacts.
7. VII. HAZARDS AIIID HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the
project:
. c)
a)
Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous
materials?
b)
Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school?
CEQA Checklist
8
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
[gj
o
o
o
o
o
[gj
[gj
4-03
.
e
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous
materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to
the public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working in the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in
the project area?
g)
Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures toa sigificant risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are
adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed
with wildlandS?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
File No.: CUP 2005-005
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
o
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
No
Impact
[gj
[gj
[gj
[gj
[gj
Thll proposed service station will require routine transport for refill of the gas tanks. However, the number of
trips will be minimal and will not have significant impacts.
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the project:
a) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be
a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level (I.e., the production rate of pre-existing
nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been
granted)?
b) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,
in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation
on- or off-site?
I c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
CEQA Checklist
9
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
[gj
[gj
[gJ
4-03
.
eh)
Ii
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,
or !lubstantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a
manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site?
d)
Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity
of Ilxisting or planned storm water drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
e)
Otherwise substantially degrade water quality
f)
Violate any other water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
g)
Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area, as mapped on
a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or
other flood hazard. delineation map?
Place within a 100-year floodplain structures which would impede
or redirect flood flows?
i)
Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the
failure of a levee or dam?
j)
Expose people or structures to Inundation by seiche, tsunami or
mudflow?
k)
During project construction, will it create or contribute runoff water
that would violate any water quality standards or waste dischrage
requirements, including the terms of the City's municipal separate
stromwatef sewer system persmit?
I)
After the project'is completed, will it create or contribute runoff
water that would violate any water quality standards or waste
dischrage requirements, including the terms of the City's
municipal separate stormwater sewer system permit?
Allow polluted stormwater runoff from delivery areas or loading
docks or other areas where materials are stored, vehicles or
CEOA Checklist
10
Potentially
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
File No.: CUP 2005-005
Less Than
Significant
With
Mlllgation
Incorporation
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
No
Impact
[gj
18I
[gj
[gj
181
[gj
[gj
18I
[gj
[gj
4-03
.
e
'a)
equipment are fueled or maintained, waste is handled, or
ha,7.ardous materials are handled or delivered, or other outdoor
work areas, to impair other waters?
n) Potential for discharge of stormwater to cause significant harm on
the biological Integrity of the waterways and water bodies
including municipal and comestic supply, water contact or non-
contact recreation and groundwater recharge?
0) Dlschrage stormwater sothat significant harm is caused to the
biological integrity of waterways or water bodies?
p) Significantly alter the flow velocity or volume of storm water runoff
that can use environmental harm?
q) Significantly increase erosion, either on or off-stie?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
File No.: CUP 2005-005
Less Than
Significant
With
MIUgaUon
Incorporation
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
No
Impact
[gj
[gj
[gj
[81
The proposed seNice station will be in a fully developed area. The proposed use will be subject'to an
Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit so as not to violate Regional Water Quality Control Board water quality
standards or wasta discharge requirements. The proposal wilinot alter absorption rates, drainage patterns,
suttace runoff, suttace water conditions, or ground water conditions. The site is within the Santa Anita Dam
Inundation Area, but will not expose people to any additional or increased hazard levels. The project will not
have any of the above impacts.
9.
LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
b) Confiict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of
an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not
limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or
zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
c) Confiict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural
community conservation plan?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
The proposed seNlce station will be in a fully deveioped area and will not have any of the above impacts.
10. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that
would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
CEOA Checklist
11
o
o
o
[gj
[gj
[gj
[gj
4-03
.
e
I b)
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-Important mineral
resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific
plan or other land use pian?
POlantially
Significant
Impact
o
File No.: CUP 2005-005
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
No
impact
[gj
Th'3 proposed service station will be in a fully developed area and will not have any of the above impacts.
11. NOISE - Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general pian or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundbome
vibration or groundbome noise levels?
c)
A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the
project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where
suc:h a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
[gj
[gj
[gj
[gj
[gj
181
The proposed service station will be in a fully developed area and will not have any of the above impacts.
12. POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project:
a)
Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly
(for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
CEQA Checklist
12
o
o
o
o
o
o
[gj
[gj
4-03
.
e
.
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
Polantially
Significant
Impact
o
File No.: CUP 2005-005
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
No
Impact
[gj
The proposed service station will be in a fully developed area and will not have any of the above impacts.
13. PUBLIC SERVICES - Would the project:
a) Result In substantial adverse physical impacts 'associated with the
provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need
for new or physically altered govemmental facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response
times or other performance objectives for any of the public
services:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Pa~ks?
OUler public: facilities?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
[gj
IZI
[gj
[gj
[gj
The proposed service station will be in a fully developed area and will not have any of the above impacts.
14. RECREATION - Would the project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or
ot~er recreational facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the
cOl1struction or expansion of recreational facilities which have an
adverse physical effect on the environment?
o
o
o
o
o
o
[gj
[gj
The proposed service station will be in a fully developed area and will not have any of the above impacts.
15. TRANSPORTATIONfTRAFFIC - Would the project:
a)
Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial In relation to the
existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (Le., result in
a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips. the
volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)?
CEQA Checklist
13
o
o
o
[gj
4-03
.
f)
egl
b)
Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service
standard established by the county congestion management
agency for desIgnated roads or highways?
c)
Result in a change in air traffic pattems, including either an
increase in traffic levels or a change in location that resulis in
substantial safety risks?
d)
Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous inte~sections) or Incompatible uses
(e.g., farm equipment)?
e)
Result in inadequate emergency access?
Result in inadequate parking capacity?
Confiict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting
altElrnative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
o
File No.: CUP 2005-005
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
incorporation
o
o
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
o
No
Impact
[gj
[gj
[gj
[gj
~
[gj
The proposed service station will be in a fully developed area and will not have any of the above impacts.
16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
.
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable
Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater
treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage
facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental effects?
d)
Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from
existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded
entitiements needed? In making this determination, the City shall
consider whether the project is subject to the water supply
assessment requirements of Water Code Section 10910, etseq.
CEQA Checklist
14
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
[gj
~
[gj
[gj
4.03
-- - -
File No.: CUP 2005-005
. Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
(SB 610), and the requirements of Govemment Code Section
664737 (SB221).
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider 0 0 0 [gj
which serves or may serve the project determined that it has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in
addition to the provider's existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to 0 0 0 181
accommodate the project's soiid waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, state and local statues and regulations 0 0 0 [gj
related to solid waste?
The proposed service station will be in a fully developed area and will not have any of the above impacts.
17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
e a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quaiity of the 0 0 0 [gj
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildiife
sp~lcies, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eiiminate important examples of
the major periods of Caiifomia history or prehistory?
b Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but 0 0 0 [gj
cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means
that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects
of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
c) Does the project have environmental effects which wll1 cause 0 0 0 [gj
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
The proposed service station will be in a fully developed area and will not have any of the above impacts.
.
CEQA Checkiist
15
4-03
FileNo.
e
.
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
(626) 574-5400
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
Date Filed:
General Information
1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor:
E2. L...lA 8 c::
3So(.. vJ. ~"""& Ui'fJt'~ J>t2. ..f>
':;-~'"tA A-NA / {"Ad-- q'/; 701.(
2.
Address of project (Location):
:; 1>..."",\-(, 12D~l ( Arc ...J;,." ct\
Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project:
A~J' G.....t.. . WP 'i'_~U's. q~9... 301- 36.SR
1S''t;1.o LQ.'IM\~ 0-r"'" 12o..J #:ti170
=r:;.":H I CA 1~61r
4.
List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this
project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies:
C..J'f,'"",...{ l.1.x ~~",,:t '"5 regv-,'rv:L ~'1 Cry
5. Zoning: c.;;l G~{ C..,..,~U'r.",,(
6. General Plan Designation: CO/V\(II/UC ir)
,
'.
Proiect DescriDtion
7.
Proposed use of site (project description):
(,'CAM.+ r.. oJes of.. re lQ.cc. ~ <.{Je. z..onA
7ITA-h~~ Wl';{. V>~ fM<.h.....Dt;.'(~ .(J,,~
/"c,ci ~f" 6 'Ie 0''( l...hrt'( h~
'.
,
9.
Site Size: ~~~, 8?f..~h'Sq. Ft.1 0.I/54{1f("
I~
Square footage per building:
~Jr8 $'2,.tl-.
Acre( s)
10. Number of floors of construction:
14.
e
19.
.
I
11. Amount of off-street parking provided:
NGh~
12. Proposed scheduling of project:
W!'~ / yeo.-r.
13. Associated projects:
11/^~ 0#
Anticipated incremental development:
{,J I 7i,. , '-..
I r~c-/"
15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or
rents, and type of household sizes expected:
-.1J~",.c...
16. If commercial, indicate the type, Le. neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square
footage of sales area, and loading facilities, hours of operation:
r+ a..-' C. pM . ~/h...",{.:f~ j::..el.j /'Mod 11,1 r:/'-;'iU' ~r,'t(7'
17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities:
No..~
18. If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated
occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project:
(1/0"1<..
If the project involves a variance, conditional use permit or zoning application, state this
and indicate clearly why the application is required:
G",iw.lu( ~-e. ~""l'f I'S r"t",'-dJ 6'1 e.~ b/~(AJ~ ~f-fk(Mf-
Df pffA-....,,,? du-c.. +0 ct..l>l4,,~ 01 w-e.. fr._ w-.fu,..,o 1:.. 1-( ~(,..(
. f <; +...f>...... to fI-iAblM.l:lI'fc. -!r.w-I...,; rf.".j,~,,\ "",'f/... ttM.~",ob.'Ie. /"6r.i,,f...... ..
Enwonln or:orm ...I- -~ ~,C)1
Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects?
checl(ed yes (attach additional sheets as necessary).
YES NO
o )il 21.
o ~ 22.
..
08'23.
0%24.
o 1& 25.
o ~ 26.
o,m 27.
Ola' 28.
rO 29.
0 ~30.
0 ~31.
DB( 32.
0181 33.
Discuss below all items
Change in existing features of any hills, or substantial alteration of ground
contours.
Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public
lands or roads.
Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project.
Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity.
Change in ground water quality or. quantity, or alteration of existing drainage
patterns.
Substantial change in existing noise or vibration level!! in the vicinity.
Is site on filled land or on any slopes of 10 percent or more?
Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances,
flammable or explosives
Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)
Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas,
etc.)
Relationship to a larger project or series of projects
Has a prior environmental impact report been prepared for a program, plan,
policy or ordinance consistent with this project?
o or 34. If you answered YES to question no. 33, may this project cause significant
effects on the environment that were not examined in the prior EIR?
Environmental Settina
Describe (on a separate sheet) the project site as it exists before the project, including
information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, any cultural, historical or
scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the
structures. Attach photographs of the site. (Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be
accepted.) (\ Jt. 1 I. . . I tos
'Jet &l1\4c..l.4c.J Ot.s(.rlp~o... o....J fl-lo '
35.
.
EnvlronlnfoFoTlll
-3-
4101
,.
Describe (on a separate sheet) the surrounding properties, including information on
plants, animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land uses
(residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses,
shops, department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-backs,
rear yards, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will
be accepted.
Certification
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the
data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the
facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
Date <I - ,......0 '-f
WJ./o ~
(Signa1ure)
For
E-2.
L. ~ I",,<:...
e
.
EnlAronlnfoFOI111
-4-
4101
.
e
.
City of Arcadia
Environmental Information Form
Item # 35 for proposed site address:
3 Duarte Road, Arcadia CA
The site is currently raw land. No structures currently exist
on the site. The site is flat. Surrounding and adjacent uses
include gas service station, egg distribution center, tire
change facility, retail, and library. The site contains no
toxic substances, plants or animals, or cultural, historical,
or scenic aspects.
See attached photos of the site as it is today.
0),
(.
o
o
~
.:;
-"
l,.'::";,~._~',
"
.....
:r>.':
~ -
r;:~""'" ._... w. _ .-'- _.... j
.- '-' 1
;.~::};.:~ -;~~~:~t~:~~~j~~~:~'.~;,/~;~::~:.~~-:~~_..~~:~:~;~.o:~. :_.;~;- -.: . :';
r-.....7l'11;- ......~*j,-, l<_... "f'~~':.~'y~~?F::.I.l...~...o:~,r;~-"',___"""",1i'-' ...\~~'"":~ 4, ~-_.--, . ~"J
t:f"-':" ~:;.' .~.~.:.<o~....:~"~a.>-.. :.u'......-.o....u.:'~~~~~ .:.. ,-"';'~,":,. ~.-.t:'J.~"':~:"'~'"7'_";'-..... ,'~ .';"-~~~ ,.:.'"
~ " '.-.,..... '-~"!'~'4~ro'..t~~*":b.~'~';; .:.:&"-,r,,",,..... ~-~i>:e5-~' ~.:"...~ ~.. ~'.'....~ ''''J
r' r:~--t'~- ....:~~~":.~~it~ ~~~,t '~~'~'~..~~~~W~:~:.9-_~'~l~', A. :":~-"'::-::'~'
, '::~ "' '!l: ,... or -~~' "', ...:'.:.tP.'l.....: ...~ ~., "\~:.:., .......,.:..~ _ ". _~~~~... ..1jo:l""".~
. ;~'d, "~ '. _ ...,', ,,",,,_v...,,.;...~~. .,....,.,..~,,~. . ",.."". . ""_"~~
~~ Ii' -u." ".:..;,:'k~ "tt':>:'~~-;r--~.:~~. u I '~r---..';. "'~"'5: ~:.t' '.~ - _ y--
J:;j" ~":;;~..-?;-.:;: 1" :- ~.:ad~ ~I' "~: ,~~l......~,;g:~.i, ~.."'~~-:.'t,.~.,.-4.f>g~t.~ -..~I:'-::.4~~':=' J~ ,J:;i ':'....~ 'r~,~...1
r. ~~. ..,-......:... . ~... :-"-":# .~ ~~~''''''''''''~-;.o~~~r~~~~ --...-.:. :'"1
'='';'"lo,?':-..... _~~....~.. .LA...~~;'; ~-j;;."""b!;+E...'k .......;-:t.";~./'.t-...."_~~.. ~'. ~-~.~.,
I,...~._' ~~;~.1.~~~~ ~_.~~+v~:;.';{~~p~-'::J~~$\?~?:~~i~~~~~" ~~/~P~~~~~~'~~~-~l c~~]
~ 6-.r;f-.rl~rl'. ":'T>-'{~.~L:",,:~~~~-:~~~~~'-';"~""'_'~"'f_"'''YL..~r47' ,:"~,~o"'''''_,~,!~
.
e
.
...
'.f"
I
__J
,
-~.... ~
~'"'.
_,cr"", .
""
. {,
>
'.
~
'-.
.
'"
~
. :.
. "
v ~__.'_'~ .... ~.,. .. . '\I.. ~"< t ....
~~~~i!~J~~~ir>-<-:~ :~ ~
, - ~"~1'1.~ 1Ii: .....: ~"~. ";'" ><.- ~,,'- ,,...,.~ .,,~ - . :iliL..:..
(~~r ~~: ~~~:~~:::.~.', 'l~~~.~~.~~'~~t~--~. ::- ~.,:-?~/;>
ti~~~:~~~. .~-;'-"~:i;lf';;_:~-:"~~~';;'li:f~':' '.J;..
. --'.-- ~ ....... ~,':. =-..~ - . ~ .......
,J'
?~
.
. ,
:'_~'1
..
,
t
~
',' -
""
iF.....
'$',:
,~
~
. d .. ...~~..-~ .';-i
'" .-. ,'I!t --
: ::~~_..._~.-f','~~:~..~ ~"i;;:~ ~. ; ~_...~~
.~~'t - ,'''-' '''."",
. :'''~i~~f~ ~;\t{~;t~~~?1~'~.~. .:,.,.;: .)f..::,.... ,--:. .1........
_ _ -~I':'3-.-_.
. . .~
"P$": ~i
4"
":~;-t
I
,,~
r '
....
~
::..,.-r~)j
.~ '..~
.-
-'"
'4-"'"
-'. ...
...!",; -.:", .~~
'"
-':"T
~
.~ =-
.,..."
~'... ;.
--
.....
~
'bf
t'
.-
,.'
'.
.
,
. ~..
..-.....
"
."
-- '..
-:-..~' -"--'. .'-
- -;;:
U-'~ ..:.;.~
.....,.- ..
~
'- ;i
.~..~~: '.~'
~ f~
':i~"
y
....
.
~3'~
i&;--:;j
,~. . ~_ .t
-..;~ .,r..o...:."- 7 . 'J
"II . ~<- .~~.. . -;..i::~:,~i
~.
:<ll->-
"
1 ,,-
... \J.-. Go
....,.
~
"
'''':.._ I. ~-
,':- .;.
..:<i..
-'.'.
,
"~..i::;'~ .
-:.' -!-::';~-:,&:K;--!.-.
;.......:... ~
..--..
......J'.
.. ,;-...- ..7..:..~..
--"-'