HomeMy WebLinkAbout1715
tt
.
,
RESOLUTION NO. 1715
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ARCADIA APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 04-014 & ADR 03-040 TO CONSTRUCT A 78-UNIT SENIOR
CONDOMINIUM PROJECT AT 161 COLORADO PLACE
WHEREAS, on September 20, 2004, a conditional use pennit application was filed by
Michael Sun of JWDA Architects to construct a 78-unit senior condominium project (Development
Services Department Case Nos. CUP 04-013 & ADR 02-072) at property commonly known as 161
Colorado Place; and
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held on November 9, 2004, at which time all
interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence.
NOW THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the factual data submitted by the Development Services
Department in the attached report is true and correct.
SECTION 2. This Commission finds:
1. That the granting of such Conditional Use Pennit will not be detrimental to the public
health or welfare, or injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or vicinity because the
initial study did not disclose any substantial adverse effects to the area affected by the proposed
project.
2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is a proper one for which a
Conditional Use Pennit is authorized.
3. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to accommodate
said use. All yards, spaces, walls, fences, loading, landscaping and other features inclUding the
shared par1<ing with the neighboring business, are adequate to adjust said use with the land and
uses in the neighborhood. The proposed project complies with all related zoning requirements as
set forth in the Arcadia Municipal COde.
4. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type to
cany the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use.
5. That the granting of such Conditional Use Pennit will not adversely affect the
comprehensive General Plan because the land use and current zoning are consistent with the
General Plan.
-
.
,
6. That the use applied for will not have a substantial adverse impact on the
environment, and that based upon the record as a whole there is no evidence that the proposed
project will have any potential for an adverse effect on wildlife resources or the habitat upon which
the wildlife depends.
SECTION 3. That for the foregoing reasons this Commission grants Conditional Use Permit
No. CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040, to construct a 78-unit senior condominium project at 161 Colorado
Place, upon the following conditions:
1. That a modification is granted for a 20 to 25-foot setback adjacent to Colorado
Place in lieu of the 35-foot special setback required (Sec. 9320.11.2).
2. All perimeter walls, garden walls and patio separations shall match the buildings
and be built of colored decorative block (i.e., split face, slump stone, etc.) or finished with
stucco, subject to the approval of the Community Development Administrator.
3. Detailed landscaping and irrigation plans shall be provided subject to the review
and approval of the Community Development Administrator.
4. The project plans shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the
Police Department to ensure that security features are incorporated into the project prior to
issuance of building permits.
5. All onsite signage shall be in compliance with the City's sign ordinance (AMC
Sec. 9262.4 to Sec. 9262.4.20). All proposed signage shall be reviewed and approved by
Planning Services and shall require appropriate permits from Building Services.
6. "Guest Parking Only" signs with letters not less than two inches in height shall
be properly located to designate guest parking spaces.
7. That a regulatory agreement (covenant) in a form and content approved by the
City Attorney, shall be recorded with the Los Angeles County Recorder's office prior to the
issuance of building permits. The regulatory agreement ensures that the owner and at least
one occupant of each unit shall be no less than 62 years of age and requires that the City be
notified with the sale of each unit.
8. Noncompliance with the plans, provisions and conditions of approval for CUP
04-014 & ADR 03-040 shall be grounds for immediate suspension and/or revocation of any
approvals.
9.
owner and
Approval of CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040 shall not take effect until the property
applicant have executed and filed the Acceptance Form available from the
2
.
.
,
Development Services Department to indicate awareness and acceptance of these conditions
of approval.
10. That after the issuance of a building permit a Rough Grading Certificate shall be
required prior to the placing of any concrete on the site; and a Final Grading Certificate shall
be required prior to the final building inspection. Said certificates will certify that all grading
operations have been completed in substantial compliance with the final grading plan
approved by the City Engineer, and shall be filed with, and approved by, the Community
Development Administrator.
11. Prior to the approval of any demolition, grading, or building construction plans,
the applicant shall provide the Development Services Department with a construction access
plan to identify the route of trucks entering and exiting the site and shall include the haul
route to proposed disposal areas. The plan shall also include proposed traffic control at the
access points for safe entrance and exil Trucks shall use only the approved truck routes
established by the Development Services Department and no truck access will be allowed in
the surrounding residential neighborhoods. The construction access plan is subject to the
review and approval by the Community Development Administrator.
12. That 36" box (or larger) trees shall be installed between the proposed building
and the residentiaJ properties to the east. Such landscaping and irrigation plans shall be
subject to the review and approval of the Community Development Administrator.
13. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Arcadia and Its
officers, employees, and agents from and against any claim, action, or proceeding against the City
of Arcadia, its officers, employees or agents to attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or
condition of approval of the City of Arcadia concerning this project and/or land use decision,
including but not limited to any approval or condition of approval of the City Council, Planning
Commission, or City Staff, which action is brought within the time period provided for in
Government Code Section 66499.37 or other provision of law applicable to this project or decision.
The City shall promptly notify the applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding concerning the
project and/or land use decision and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense of the matter.
The City reserves the right, at its own option, to choose its own attorney to represent the City, its
officers, employees, and agents in the defense of the matter.
3
SECTION 4. The decision and findings contained in this Resolution reflect the Planning
. Commission's action of November 9, 2004 to approve Conditional Use Permit Application No. CUP
04-014 & ADR 03-040, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners Baderian, Hsu, Olson and Wen
NOES: Commissioner Lucas
SECTION 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution and shall cause 'a
copy to be forwarded to the City Council of the City of Arcadia. I HEREBY CERTIFY that this
Resolution No. 1715 was adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on
November 23, 2004, by the following vote:
A YES: Commissioner Lucas, Olson, Wen, Baderian
NOES: None h) _ D J
ABSENT: CommissionerHsu 1 ~,..
Chairman, Planning Commission
City of Arcadia
ATTEST:
.~....-
City of Arcadia
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
~P.~
Stephen P. DeitsCh, City Attomey
-
4
, \ i'
'-
.' ..
t.
e
e
e
STAFF REPORT
Development Services Department
November 9,2004
TO: Arcadia City Planning Commission
FROM: Donna L. Butler, Community Development Administrator
By: Joseph M. Lambert, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: Application Nos. CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040: A Conditional Use
Permit and Architectural Design Review Application to construct a 78-
unit senior condominium project at 161 Colorado Place.
SUMMARY
The subject applications were submitted by Michael Sun to construct a 78-unit senior
condominium project located at 161 Colorado Place. The Development Services
Department is recommending approval of the applicant's requests, subject to the
conditions outlined in this staff report.
GENERAL INFORMATION
APPLICANT: Michael Sun (project architect)
LOCATION: 161 Colorado Place
REQUEST: Conditional Use Permit and Architectural Design Review application
to construct a 78-unit senior condominium project on the subject lot.
SITE AREA: 76,273 square feet (1.75 acres)
FRONTAGES: 325 feet along Colorado Place
71 feet along San Juan Drive
EXISTING LAND USE & ZONING:
The project site is a 1.75-acre parcel located on Colorado Place
between Huntington Drive and San Juan. The site is currently
developed with a 60-room hotel (the Westerner) that was buih in
CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
November 9. 2004
Page 1
,
.
r
'.
e
.
(e
.,
1946. This building will be removed subsequent to approval of this
project. The entire site is zoned C-2: General Commercial.
SURROUNDING LAND USES & ZONING:
North: Pepper's Restaurant - zoned C-2
South: Office Building - zoned C-2
East: Single-Family Residences - zoned R-1
West: Santa Anita Racetrack - zoned S-1
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Commercial
BACKGROUND
Design Review application No. ADR 03-040 was conceptually approved by the
Development Services Department on August 18, 2004, Because any residential
development is a conditionally permitted use within the C-2 zone, a Conditional Use
Permit application must be approved concurrently with the Architectural Design
Review. The proposed project is also consistent with the General Plan Land use
designation of the project site, which allows senior residential developments with an
approved conditional use permit.
PROPOSAL
The proposed development consists of six three-story buildings totaling 86,200
square feet (see the attached building elevations and floor plans). The applicant's
proposal involves the removal of the existing structures on the site, and the
construction of a 78-unit senior condominium project. The condominiums are
intended for sale to private parties and shall be occupied by individuals 62 years of
age or older, as set forth in a regulatory agreement between the City and the
property owner(s). The units are single level, have two bedrooms each, and range
from 1,000 to 1,400 square feet in size.
Zonina and General Plan
The proposed project is within the C-2 zone and the Commercial land use
designation of the General Plan. Residential development is a conditionally
permitted use within the C-2 zone, and is subject to review and approval by the
Planning Commission. The proposed project is subject to the development
standards of the C-2 zone and the City's Architectural Design Guidelines.
Typically, market rate residential condominium projects are subject to the provisions
of the R-3 (Multiple-Family Residential) zone. The proposed project is located within
the C-2 zone, which does not specify development standards for residential projects.
Although staff has used the R-3 Regulations as a guide, this application is not
subject to the specific regulations of the R-3 zone.
CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
November 9, 2004
Page 2
,
,
"
"
e
e
.
"
The Commercial General Plan land use designation allows 50 dwelling units per acre
for market rate senior housing projects and 63 dwelling units per acre for "affordable"
senior housing projects. The project is on a 1.75-acre site and proposes 78 dwelling
units, which is a density of 45 dwelling units per acre. The General Plan allows for
senior housing within the Commercial land use designation to encourage housing for
the elderly, which is identified as a strategy within the Community Development
element of the General Plan.
Lavout and Desion
The proposed project is designed to resemble an Italian village. The multiple
buildings are organized around open courtyards that serve as gathering places or
garden areas. The buildings feature multi-colored stucco exterior wall treatments
with ledgestone accents, wood shutters, wood trellises, tower elements, and varying
rooflines. A significant ledgestone base material is featured on all elevations to
visually anchor the buildings. Throughout the Design Review process, the applicant
worked closely with staff and the City's architectural consultant to achieve the design
as proposed.
The buildings are all three-stories and approximately 40-feet in height, with tower
elements extending an additional eight feet to accommodate the elevators. The C-2
regulations allow a building height of 40-feet, and architectural projections may
extend 10-feet above the roofline of buildings. Typically, the R-3 zone allows a
maximum of two-stories. not to exceed 30-feet in height. It is staff's opinion that the
proposed building height is appropriate for this site, as it is within the C-2 zone and
will accommodate senior condominiums.
Concurrent with the consideration of this conditional use permit application, the
Planning Commission may approve, conditionally approve or disapprove the
applicant's design concept plans.
Setbacks
There is a special setback of 35'-0" as measured from the property line along
Colorado Place (Sec. 9320.11.2). The applicant is requesting a modification for a 20
to 25-foot setback adjacent to Colorado Place in lieu of the 35-foot special setback
required. The office building to the southeast has a setback of 24'-0" and the patio
area of Pepper's restaurant to the northwest has a setback of 12'-0". Also, the
existing Westerner Hotel building on the project site is setback 28'-0" from Colorado
Place. Allowing a varied setback between 20 and 25 feet for the proposed project
would result in a setback consistent with the existing and adjacent development.
The proposed condominium project includes 10-foot northerly and southerly side
yard setbacks. The C-2 Regulations do not require side yard setbacks; because the
land uses to the north and south are commercial. Although the proposed 10-foot
CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
November 9, 2004
Page 3
,
e
--
.
side yard setbacks comply with the zoning regulations of the project site, based on
lot frontage, 15-foot side yard setbacks would be required for such a project in
conformance with the R-3 Regulations. However, because the northerly and
southerly side yards are adjacent to a commercial building, the impacts associated
with a 10-foot setback are minimal.
The proposed easterly setback varies between 15 and 18 feet, consistent with the
regulations of the R-3 zone. In staff's opinion it is appropriate to require an easterly
setback consistent with the R-3 Regulations because it is adjacent to a single-family
residential neighborhood. The proposed setback will provide an adequate buffer
between the subject development and the residences to the east on Santa Cruz
Road. The setback area shall be adequately landscaped to further minimize any
impact on adjacent residential development.
Parkina
The site will be accessed from San Juan Drive, to provide saferingress/egress to the
site. Colorado Place is designated asa primary arterial by the General Plan and
does not have adequate width to provide a deceleration lane for safe approach.
Also, parking is prohibited along Colorado Place. A loading and drop-off area will be
provided as vehicles enter the site. Parking is accessed from a ramp leading to the
two-level subterranean parking garage. The parking area for residents will be
separated by security gates and the 26 guest parking spaces will be available for
public use. All parking spaces are 10-feet by 20-feet, consistent with the R-3
provisions of the Municipal Code. The Police Department has suggested several
security measures for the parking garages and the tinal security plan will be reviewed
by the Police Department prior to occupancy of the site.
The applicant is proposing to provide 158 onsite parking spaces in lieu of 234 total
parking spaces required by code. In addition, eight tandem spaces will be provided,
however they are not counted as "required" parking. The R-3 Regulations state that
each dwelling unit shall have a two car garage and one guest parking space. These
regulations are intended for standard units, which in general have at least three
bedrooms and are commonly occupied by families. However, the Municipal Code
does not specify the number of parking spaces required for senior housing. The
proposed senior units will vary in size between 1,000 and 1,400 square feet and will
each have two bedrooms. Also, the proposed units will be required to be owned and
occupied by individuals at least 62 years of age or older. The residents of the
proposed condominiums will most likely have fewer vehicles per household
compared to families occupying "standard" units.
The applicant submitted a traffic and parking study which was reviewed by the City
Traffic Engineer. The study includes an analysis of off-street parking demand, and a
warrant analysis for a traffic signal at Colorado Place and San Juan Drive. The study
concluded that a traffic signal is not warranted and that the proposed senior housing
CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
November 9, 2004
Page 4
.
e
e
-
.
project will probably generate less traffic during peak times than the existing motel on
the property. The City Traffic Engineer concurs with this analysis and also agrees
that the amount of proposed off-street parking will be sufficient for the senior
. condominium project.
Staff conducted a survey of several surrounding communities regarding parking
requirements for senior housing. The jurisdictions surveyed required between 1 and
1.5 parking spaces per unit for senior housing. The proposed project will have
slightly more than 2 parking spaces per unit, significantly more than required by most
jurisdictions. Also, a senior condominium project that was recently approved by the
Planning Commission is parked at approximately 2 spaces per unit. It is the opinion
of staff that the amount of parking proposed is sufficient for the type of senior
condominium units.
Open Space and LandscapinQ
For residential developments within the R-3 zone, the private open space
requirement is 200 square feet for ground floor units and 100 square feet for second
floor units. The proposed units feature private balconies ranging between 55 and 75
square feet. As previously stated, the proposed development is located within the C-
2 zone and therefore, the private open space requirements of the R-3 zone do not
apply. However, in staff's opinion, the size of the private open space areas as
proposed are mitigated by the presence of the large common open space areas and
the 2,000 square foot recreation room.
Multiple family residential projects containing 10 or more units are required to have at
least 28% of the total lot area in open space. The proposed project features over
46,000 square feet of open space. Therefore, 60% of the lot area is comprised of
open space in conformance with the R-3 Regulations. The applicant is also
proposing a 2,000 square foot recreation center as part of the project.
A landscape plan prepared by a licensed Landscape Architect has been conceptually
approved with the Architectural Design Review drawings. The City's landscape
design consultant has reviewed these plans as part of the conceptual approval
process. However, detailed landscaping and irrigation plans shall be submitted and
reviewed by staff as a condition of approval.
Staff believes that the applicant's proposal meets the intent of the design criteria set
forth in the City's Architectural Design Review Regulations. The design elements of
the subject buildings (I.e., stone veneer, wood shutters, tower elements, etc.) will
provide the necessary visual relief avoiding flat wall areas. All elevations have been
treated to avoid symmetry and to provide a high level of materials and design quality.
It is the opinion of staff that the proposed design is consistent with the multiple family
residential design guidelines and mitigates the requests to deviate from code
requirements.
CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
November 9, 2004
Page 5
.
.
e
~
ReQulatorv AQreement
To ensure that the condominiums are owned and occupied by at least one senior
citizen per household, a regulatory agreement (covenant) shall be filed with the Los
Angeles County Recorder's office. The regulatory agreement ensures that the owner
and at least one occupant of each unit shall be no less than 62 years of age, and
requires that the City be notified with the sale of each unit. The agreement also
gives the City the power to enforce the regulations set forth in the agreement. A
draft of this agreement is currently under review by the City Attorney and will be
reviewed and approved by the City prior to issuance of building permits for the
proposed project.
Amenities and MitiQation Measures
Although this project applicant is requesting relief from several accepted
development standards for multiple~family residential units, the proposed
development exceeds the minimum Code requirements as follows:
. PubliC Open Space - The proposed project features over 46,000 square feet of
common open space in addition to the private balconies for each unit. Therefore,
60% of the lot area is in open space, significantly more than the 28% total open
space required for multiple family residential units.
. Recreation Center - The proposed project includes a 2,000 square foot
recreation center for the use of the residents.
. Design/Layout - The architectural design and proposed exterior materials meet
or exceed the standards set forth in the City's Architectural Design Review
Guidelines. The open courtyard areas provide gathering spaces and will include
unique themed gardens with decorative wood trellises. Also, the applicant has
proposed a 4'-0" high decorative fence adjacent to the Colorado Place frontage.
The proposed fence shall consist of a 2'-0" high stucco wall with an additional 2'-
0" of decorative wrought iron on top. The decorative fence/wall will meander
along the Colorado Place street frontage, and will be setback no less than 3'-0"
from the property line.
Deoartmental Requirements
All City requirements regarding disabled access and facilities, building safety, fire
prevention, detection, and suppression, police safety, and site design will be
complied with to the satisfaction of the Building Official, Fire Marshall, Police Chief,
and Community Development Administrator. The Police Department has suggested
several specific security measures for the proposed project and the final security
plan will be reviewed by the Police Department prior to issuance of building permits.
CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
November 9, 2004
Page 6
,
.
e
~
The project site is within Central Redevelopment Project Area and therefore, is
subject to the review and approval of the Arcadia Redevelopment Agency.
Redevelopment staff has reviewed the conceptual design plans and is in support of
the project. Subsequent to Planning Commission approval, this project shall be
scheduled for Arcadia Redevelopment Agency review.
ANALYSIS
The proposed project features exceptional open space, recreation areas, design
features, and landscaping that exceed the requirements for multiple family residential
projects. These features mitigate the requested variations from code that are
necessary to accommodate the senior housing units. It is staffs opinion that the
applicant's proposal meets the intent for such variations to be granted because, if
approved, the proposed development will secure an appropriate improvement to the
site. Also, it is the opinion of staff that the proposed project exemplifies and furthers
the goals of the General Plan in providing senior housing.
FINDINGS
Section 9275.1.2 of the Arcadia Municipal Code requires that for a Conditional Use
Permit to be granted, it must be found that all of the following prerequisite conditions
can be satisfied:
1. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not be detrimental to the
public health or welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such zone
or vicinity.
2. That the use applied for at the location indicated is properly one for which a
Conditional Use Permit is authorized.
3. That the site for the proposed use is adequate in size and shape to
accommodate said use, and all yards. spaces, walls, fences, parking, loading,
landscaping, and other features required to adjust said use with the land and
uses in the neighborhood.
4. That the site abuts streets and highways adequate in width and pavement type
to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use.
5. That the granting of such Conditional Use Permit will not adversely affect the
comprehensive General Plan.
CEQA
Pursuant to the provIsions of the California Environmental Quality Act, the
Development Services Department has prepared an Initial Study for the proposed
project. Said Initial Study did not disclose any substantial or potentially substantial
adverse change in any of the physical conditions within the area affected by the
CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
November 9, 2004
Page 7
.
-
.
project including land, air, water, minerals, flora, fauna, ambient noise and objects of
historical or aesthetic significance that could not be made less than significant with
mitigation incorporation, When considering the record as a whole, there is no
evidence that the proposed project will have any potential for adverse effect on
wildlife resources or the habitat upon which the wildlife depends. Therefore, a
Negative Declaration has been prepared for this project.
RECOMMENDATION
The Development Services Department recommends approval of Conditional Use
Permit Application No. CUP 04-013 & ADR 02-072 subject to the following conditions:
1. That a modification is granted for a 20 to 25-foot setback adjacent to Colorado
Place in lieu of the 35-foot special s'etback required (Sec. 9320.11.2).
2. All perimeter walls, garden walls and patio separations shall match the
buildings and be built of colored decorative block (I.e., split face, slump stone,
etc.) or finished with stucco,' subject to the approval of the Community
Development Administrator.
3. Detailed landscaping and irrigation plans shall be provided subject to the
review and approval of the Community Development Administrator.
4. The project plans shall be reviewed and approved to the satisfaction of the
Police Department the project plans to ensure that security features are
incorporated into the project prior to issuance of building permits.
5. All onsite signage shall be in compliance with the City's sign ordinance (AMC
Sec. 9262.4 to Sec. 9262.4.20). All proposed signage shall be reviewed and
approved by Planning Services and shall require appropriate permits from
Building Services.
6. "Guest Parking Only" signs with letters not less than two inches in height shall
be properly located to designate guest parking spaces.
7. That a regulatory agreement (covenant) in a form and content approved by
the City Attorney, shall be recorded with the Los Angeles County Recorder's
office prior to the issuance of building permits. The regulatory agreement
ensures that the owner and at least one occupant of each unit shall be no less
than 62 years of age and requires that the City be notified with the sale of
each unit.
8. Noncompliance with the plans, provisions and conditions of approval for
CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040 shall be grounds for immediate suspension and/or
revocation of any approvals.
9. Approval of CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040 shall not take effect until the property
owner and applicant have executed and filed the Acceptance Form available
CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
November 9, 2004
Page 8
.
e
-
from the Development Services Department to indicate awareness and
acceptance of these conditions of approval.
10. That after the issuance of a building permit a Rough Grading Certificate shall
be required prior to the placing of any concrete on the site; and a Final
Grading Certificate shall be required prior to the final building inspection. Said
certificates will certify that a.ll grading operations have been completed in
substantial compliance with the final grading plan approved by the City
Engineer, and shall be filed with, and approved by, the Community
Development Administrator.
11. The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City of Arcadia
and its officers, employees, and agents from and against any claim,action, or
proceeding against the City of Arcadia, its officers, employees or agents to
attack, set aside, void, or annul any approval or condition of approval of the
City of Arcadia concerning this project and/or land use decision, including but
not limited to any approval or condition of approval of the City Council,
Planning Commission, or City Staff, which action is brought within the time
period provided for in Government Code Section 66499.37 or other provision
of law applicable to this project or decision. The City shall promptly notify the
applicant of any claim, action, or proceeding concerning the project and/or
land use decision and the City shall cooperate fully in the defense of the
matter. The City reserves the right, at its owri option, to choose its own
attorney to represent the City, its officers, employees, and agents in the
defense of the matter.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Approval
The Planning Commission should move to adopt the Negative Declaration,
approve Application Nos. CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040 to construct a 78-unit
senior condominium project at 161 Colorado Place, and direct staff to prepare
a resolution Incorporating the Commission's decision and specific findings.
Denial
If the Planning Commission intends to deny the Conditional Use Permit and
Architectural Design Review applications, the Commission should move for denial
and direct staff to prepare a resolution incorporating the Commission's decision and
specific findings.
If any Planning Commissioner, or other interested party has any questions or
comments regarding this matter prior to the November 9th, 2004 public hearing,
please contact Joe Lambert at (626) 574-5444.
CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
November 9, 2004
Page 9
.
-
-
Approved by;,
,7
,
.M
, 'I A J
( . I ."/ '
Donna'L.- Buller v
Community Development Administrator
0(
Attachments: Aerial Photo & Zoning Map
Land Use Map
Plans and Exhibits
Departmental Conditions
Draft Negative Declaration and Initial Study
Environmental Information
CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
November 9, 2004
Page 10
~
N
llJ1J
o
llJ1JFe<<
~ 161 Colorado PI
o Arcadia
IE] Zone
1fs
161 Colorado Place
CUP 04-014
ADR 03-040
velopment SeNices Department
, Engineering Division
~
100
,
N
o
(201) ,
I
\
, (200J
--
-;-:---
,/
100
:
--
-,-
. (146)
,
.-
\'-.",./ ~
\: ~ 0
./ ~U~.,
_/ I\..~ -
Sr .,'
;" .-.......
,
,
(143)
. (140)
,.
"
.'
RESIDENTIAL'
(130)
.' " \S' " .
/ . (133)" \ ~A~" ". (12~
/' ~,,~ '.
, . ~
. . (129) ,: C' ~
- (l23J' I
(117)
..'
"
, \
....
.- PEPPERS
\
,
a '\ (181)
, 9.. \
'. '0 "
',~'
" ~
'-0
<
;"
,../ ,/
,
.....<
",
SANTA
ANITA
RACETRACK
'.
,
,
OFFICE
BUILDING
,
.I
,/.., "
-
/
./
"
,
'"
.~
,
""
,
. (125)
"
-,
,
,
1ts
161 Colorado Place
CUP 04-014
ADR 03-040'
evelopmenl Setvices Deparlmenl
Engineering Division .
pared by. RS,Gon11lIez, 0CI0ber, 2004
-
-
--
~__,,\Lt.
~""Irt
_",_,,"C3>Qo~1l-'l
VJ r '<lUf> 1Il\." .:n-.
t.Ih IlIl!1"U, t~ ",m
_'t II:!tI-Jn-~ln
U,lI' 1f:.1i-;M-"~
Cl:\II'''<I:'''D<.&I'L5tIt
PROs(-T OAT A
""",,~
"'''''~tuCII.&liO'''-
~t.t'l'1tIIT'
~m'{)o"'ll" A ~n~I11$.O"!
="
sa_up
1$1'\l.'U8'..e/.no ""'(:'I' 7&.1"S9
111~~I,""lOI~SG_trT<W(
1l'.l~1 n."",,\I051 ".tl:J'Qr I.ll' JJ
1II,U.,..IIQ.l'94'lJ1>>"CnltU
"ll4'!1.n<l~ ("DIll)
,....:lli~~l.O'ftOoO"'~I"C:n'I
(,:I(O'TJJ1lt'U''''fJ<,.,~.[
",..,fflolli'Mla-n" "!IU"lt1
"lI4aTl\lOflq
~DItW- ~ftu>al)WatIllCll'ID'~"
\"~fQllu.or_l.lI(J
~'IWTS.porUN!1_t_
~tJ(t~I' ...uN/ii:
",crv.,ttl_lIoll'oo !<lX'" .....' , ~1tf"-'8"~cr
''4IlAt.tIll.lltL\7tCII[OCII1L~-O'
~4.lIC>: ..",,""
~1I~O(;!'(11I.t~,
/ tw)OAOO.... I fll(ltll J'J_tf'
I ~~r:k~-~ = l ~ '~:~;.
P....,.,..Ill~ '9/"1)1>1""""'''''11)1
.~
"'"
L(Jt~1S
UlW.1'($C_.1l:t<
,q;P.IlfICJlO,UIJI,![IIlMI
j I,.. STIIltlAFll.' "It. n',IlDfl> I
J~.tt!>.",,_
tH,~1
/IVIWlh<:(l(1l:IltI'1ICJt.
8.2)>("'"~'OOOg
,,!.~_.....a_Ol(1;>OO;t:(ll<
~~ru"" <I>.allQSI\,,-OI;P"'U,
rr......'_>lnf_,._'I7._..
n<:t...o'1.(I<O> l'!lD(lO~ j .'l0N> AJtf..)
8_1."1011/
~n..-.;aI:l'.'ilIl5i"~'IIE'"
"''''''_''''''_~1HJ_1(lW
TlHAL ru,'" &Ill': 1llI,:llG~r
fog II.!
/CO"'D(!lOl'l'!><$>'.1:4'1ll,.ooD;(U't,0I10T'
r:tItlllJl,.(W!'I17,1:I..
O'I>€IlSI~R.t(l./IC>rU....~
DIll.1.f!C~.1K~
~ t41_fllOO : 1IUII'!OtN.' IIJ".. '.OQO~
"tIt1Il_''Il(>J-~'II~1><''OO'iF
VICINI}) I.lAP
-
ARCADIA SENIOR HOUSING
161 COLORADO PLACE
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA 91007
./
./
~
-
---
--
)........-
.. -.......
..1
,t'..._.
I' ......--
.I
/
-
-.,.-,.....,
--
c
-..
-'.
/
'-.
-
._h_._
.-" ..../"....
/
.------..- ..- -~
-----------
(
CD
SrTE PlAN
"@'
~
v.:~!/~'..,-(I'
...
-
~
.,.., ,
, ! I
",
, ,
), i~, I i
/
/ ~Iu ~ F.
/ ,
ld'l ~
/ ~
'''n~II'lml"1
j!i'll'lil~~,~"
"1111' ,II'
Rfdi;~lulim
<( Ii{
0 ,II
~ 1'1
J IiI
D
/
/-
""
,'/"/~~
~
....4
ZCl
<.
~C'
~~
We
::0:
'"~
./
"
/'
./
,
-
-~.2:rDC4
- ,,!:-..-(l,-
.,
"'" -
~10lJl_
-
e
/ / ,
,
, , I
, ,
/ / ,
,
, I
,
/ / ,
I I
I
,
,
/ / ,
,
, /
,
I /
; ~
/ : ,
I
, i$ /
. ~
/ ~ ,
,
/
/ ,
~,
~.
, ~'ff
,
/ lit
,
/
/ ,
,
/
,
,
/
,
,
/ ......~
_.~
\
\
,
,
\
,
,
\
,
I
\
.
I
\
I
,
\
,
,
\
-----
--
--
------
r.,,",~_
,
,
l
..... -~--
- -----
~~Q..--------
-
--
COlOR..,
00 PLtce
---
-
--
11)--=
-.
" 0 ~ , ,.r ---..
,0, --__.
~t ,/.".,,,'-0)" \cy --
~
'-'
NO FLOOR PLAN
\
--
..,
-
~
,
,
::I
I
lq
,Iii I~
J
F.
ii
.
~
'1.~~lI"lllfl::ll
I"I.:(,I~I" I
'!Ir;~r.ill::!:i
lliu!lm~:I!!~1
4: ~ I: (I
O'td,
3: i IIJ I
J;I,;';
I I
D
z
.
~
~
~
10
10
~
~
'"
3
113
I
-
.... 2l"..22Q04
..... '/lr.'.r...ot
n
O<m .
43001
/ ,
,
, /
,
/ ,
,
, /
,
I ,
,
,
,
,
'~
I'
,
,
I
,
,
/
,
,
/
,
/"
W)'.
..
I,~
,
/
,
,
/
,
,
I
,
,
/
.
.
L
-..---
--
---
1~7.~~_
--
- -----
COlOll..tbo
....ce
---
SECOND'A...OOR PLAN -'.....0 '" l..
!:U-11: I!Hr.l'-o- ~-----
--
-
/
,
.
/
.
.
I
/
.
.
I
.'
.
I
,
, ~
I ~
~
~
I ~
I
I
I
I
-
-
-
---4~
-
, '
-
, I
~~
-------
-
---
--
--
---
J
.
.
ll_7m,...._It:lil.-
- Da'A..22I>>2"4'"
\-
---
-
~
~
i I
2~ ~
It< ~
U ~
IU II
I
~
"
~
~.
l'I':II;lt~IIv,I::lr
'11..ijr~I~'lu
I "IIi II'
ti,ll.,.!lrI1ti'''
!ltl!llIIIIUillll
<C Iltl
O'Jd.
3: 11!J I
""),1",
! I
D
Z
4
~
"-
'"
o
o
~
u
Q
Z
Q
:~
,
o
-
- 2l".2 2DC4
- lfll,'..r..()"
-,
-.. -
A3002
-
// ~,
........
...".....
........,
'........
'........,
-~
,
,
I
,
.;.. ..~
I
,
,
I
-
-
,
.."....
"-
I
I
p
,
I
I
I
I
,
,
//
,
,
/
,
,
/
,
,
/
~ '
'" ~,
q !JO
~gjiJ
'I '"
$ i
/
/
/
,
,
L
--
--.
-~
..-~l:zts'"
11 .-54'__
.../
.-.
--
-
-
i---
-
.-.
"
.
I
,
-r"'
I
,
,
I
.
,
~
-
DD.l..... mS2'U'
-
-----
-
--
--
--
---
--
------
------_.~---
~
I
Iq I
! l~ ~ ~
19!1 I~ ~
~
'11'~II;ml'llql::11
'I jl'~I~' ,III
.~!t I!(jp'fll'
~rJi'I~'''JI!ii'lll
,liUllnU1n{
<C
O~
:f;i
""')j
III I
III.
r II I
liJ,
I
D
z
~
~
0-
or
a
a
~
~
a
or
;!'
- ~.2 200.
- r/.t\"wt"-(l"
"
-
"'" -
~30O:L
.'
/~
!~
.
!~
J~
/~
,.
,
,
,
,
:
,
:
.'
,
,
:
,
,
,
I
l
-
,
/
,
,
,
"
'.
'.
I
,
,
I
,
,
/
/
/
I
I
I
-
co~ -.
OliA.bo
-
-...
P~-1Cli --
...._'- ""',0.<;:5 -. -
'T1!i:J4/CI:;r,ou>" "'iAU' --
"f~..~t~--
~SP~S !IowGJ --.
~~~MENT 1 PLAN
",-g
"
'-
---;"@"
"
'.
e
-
"
......,-
......
IS'-o"
,.~
..-
..-
,
,
~' .
: "--..
'. ---"'-
-"
. -
~Rl
';;If
m--
" "
~ "
== ::II ;.0
\
~
~
I
lu !
I 9 jt ~ i
Igg~ It ~
'1;\Ilall'II1II': I
liq, hl:1l111
,111"III'I,::JJ
~r."IJti'lq ~lt:i
!~d.hGl~I;!:1I
<(11",1
O' I'
:> i Iii;
:>' I f II
......' (" ,
"': .'.
1 j
D
z
<:
ii'
f-
Z
UJ
:E
UJ
ill
,".
I III
-
- fiEI"..2:iQCl4
-.. """'.roO'"
" ,
'.." -
~B.!...
-
,
.
.
,
!~
/$
.
/~
;~
ls
" '"
:
I
,
,
,
.
.
.
.
,
,
,
.
,
.
.
,
.
.
,
-
-
't(
: -----------
: ------
. '----
. '--
- - -
: fj' HI'~ -__
' ,.. t- ~
.~
: '. i
"'-,
'",-
""
,
,
L.__
----~-----
--~---
CO.lO.lt1bo P.l4CIi" --
,
/
,
,
1
~'"
,f "",,-
1/ ,
'"
' ""'-,
I ''''-, .
; '~
' ,
,
/ I
' ,
' ,
I I
' ,
' ,
I I
,
,
I
,
,
I
,
,
I
-----.
--..._---
. --------
..~~~;~~~
''!r~~,.''''b..~S''~
.~~ AN
BASEMENT 2 PL
~'''619
l""'.'~
-._-~--
--
~
. I
~ I! II
i~~ ~ ~
I~U I~ ~
'1n;IP,'lhli~lr
Iliq:~:!t.I'I::j,!,
~.li"'"lllr'
i~~~lIul/;,lll
2
:'J
II
--
--
I .
I ,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
: , l
<(! I P I
0, Iii;
:>, II) I
2:, Ii' I
~ ! I
u I
, u I
I ;
N
, , H
-- N
D
>> ,
I"
to....
~
.
.
v ~
~
N .,
-
I ,
, I
,
i.i
\
\ I
-.. &cTI2' .
Cl
...
m
:l:
:Jj
I ;:;
I
=- RI"...2::rco<
-- lJItc'.,'.o-
- n
.:: ';C;:"
-~ '<Y
-----
----..
--------
----------
-
e
La.....
i :::::=J
..
,
'",.
,-
,
,
'1
o
SOLIiH ELEVATION
'/l~' ..r_!r
.
i
. ,
.
,
.
'-
I~Il
~ ll'"
-'
-
C) ~:.~:'.o~LE;VAT'ON
'J"'rrP'l~ LEGPlD
"!'~'''l.o.$1TI'-ttl.t'I'",,,c><...."lt.'''''_rY....eu-ltI..C''U'''
'.!'<<>l(Jo"U$l(W'-~""104o:t!"'....ft>lff":!Uf>Ull.T1"3U~"'nl./1OI
'3, Ulltlll ""'UV-. ct'"~" u.~ ",.\lll'''''I1-'C ~.. -11:
(!' QW(I., P1.~S1tlh !;l:\C/O"".to; I"l!AilI.....'-Jor) .'$lU'l'SP:;(
~~ ~~.Ol ,,~ . ~ ....1'0. "'~ru ._1,'00 #' t<<=1ll!r'""ll
(.> "I<lllt>fnu.ti. o;no<o....,trIrt.o.zn-''''''...~, _ltt'lU&lO.
'~'~POSl.e:;uP"''''lc.o''.o.m.'''''I.'.e''''Jf5)f'''''''
<fJ. cO," Cl~' 'lU 'O;J/tt'l
,l!,...'.....c.p(lfI~tl,l.uIca...~
fi'1I11I.l.PUlO_."'''UfUQ.''"
";4' <'ltl__$l.ltlt'l
~",,",,=':-~"U-~'''U
';'ll~t:'otf"'
i.\,l('OLl.oq:><....~..!......flto.t~O"lllot.l.....'II.1Ul;Q.CIi'
VA3'DI
COlORADO PL-
~
l;U(NCf'1tO
-
~
~_:..
I
,
,
I
,
,
I
,
,
I
,
,-.
I
~
~
I
~.~ ~
~i. ~
1~li II
J
F.
to
.
~
'.'r~lrll'l" I
11,"I"ril"U",il'll
.1fT' U;I' Ill'
I """'Il "'11
!!fn!ll6uuJln
4:0 I ill
,d.
3: I'll
J li"1
I
D
0-
"''''
M:!~
~. i=
J: .,
0-'>
2~
- eJ>.2~
..... ';r'f'~
'c
-- e.:n, _
~5101_
-
I
..;
.
;
.
;
/-....... .
<1 -'1-- ----~ .
I . .
f--"------ ~---------
I .
~1----------------.--
i ..6lIofI.!r-------------un
I'
u,HOhAt tECE:rio
/t ,"U[h1l'V~~_ ctlL~ ".'0< r~.:u ,....,_71I\.l.. o;.......ru 'f CIlf....
(i' (V4t,'I'V~_ tCo..(l!l ...ft>< C~ UdOo ....o.m "",,'_n'JU~' l[u(/OI
;,io ct\IO>. ~._ cn~ "MOO '''1lllJ: I""",I.,U ~ ",11"
<1.' uutM PV\~_ ~.... ".>1.... tnom ',Ujl-~ "SV"IJPQ'
<~)o.q:h.'.lU'lUII;:_~'lIl"'.lQofll..ut"""'-'OOrpfl'nl~
~ tcnl;" ~ 1U~~5nu:
{i~!.lPll-~
~.~I!n.<.l. "t\f.......l"Il__~~ "'~ .'U ta.1)Il-
e
o ,~~~~~ ELEvATIQN
.
x
,
.
~
8 EAST EL.EVATION
, '/lr.'-.Q'
~'
1" -..or>> llItllJ$ - tel'" ""'lOl"'.oJttPIo;KI-I~' -=n Wlol)lJ<O
.@. .oa:> FOS' _ COLOI' w.>r><,...qtt ""'-le' ~[: 001_
I9'C'Sltl..,tU~
(t.oot.Al.-.oo_...,..a..toIIl;C./o$';.
i) UfUl; "'<1(1 ~...IOO tu~ cvn
1}..xo~~
&'
Q
2
q
~
~ 2/...,.) .
l!A,3101
COlORADO PL
I
~ .
(i
~0;;tJttl<
-
)
~
-...
.
~
I I
Iii I i
l~h II ~
l'I'~I~I~lllIlI::11
'ij"h:J'I"11
II(tllililll U
fii;'r~11IJ lii'l
!hd,h~u.I;,,1I
<(
o
3:
J
II. !
I"
Id.
r !Ii
1",
I
D
:J:
.... ">
OCz
~g
I-
~ <(
...>
'"~
~ ILl
- SEJl'3::!Qi04
1/1$".1'.\1'"
..", -
- ~310~
-
e
~
..
.
~
! I
, ,
.---=:+:~~~~~~~~~::~t~~~~~
~
o
INTERtOR C.OORT ELEVATION
1/'~' .'.-0'
(0
INTERIOR COURT ELEV A nON
1/'1'" "f~O.
WoTEfbAL lECiNO
~, allOlT "'<-S:VI~ C(U'lI "101 teAm """il_m~ tofJtt.. CWtw
i' (tUUl' "V-Sftll- (Ol(ll! ..ue.; (Q.lll" \l41CM ,~u:u "'''''''I_ndu ~'" ltUO'o<
~ <<KIll Pl,.OSltJI- el10l ....ft.. '''.lEt P...."-IO A1\::cIol _'I..
o cue:;' ",U1Ut_ m(Jll WIt'll '"Attt "''''''"-J,:l!) usn'll Bt.a:
<i~ ,..u~ ...UI(:. tOUJl \lo\tt>o ,,,...ttr P.lMT_tQ 0Jr~ _.
,"nax IIl# tu.~SToU
~~> P:JhOl[~l.
<!> r.<CfM. AnU,L ~_"""<[o-I>'~ ~~[. "W. ~ rnCIII
<y 0<<10 l>ITU.IS. (Q,(If \UotO< I'!uta "....'..11 ..:t ~1.lIOw
.1j;'WXIOPlKT_~unCM""I'I[p.".r_IB._rt~
(t-C*Sla.'~ r-u:!iCfPnN
{J>1oIl:Ul.-.oo..I~Q.t..~
~'OO{1.1l.-P"IlOIIOl!II""Iol(1[,r.llIOl"'~;;
.o'IO:Q)~WmJI
2/A3lO2)
~
~
'"
.:l
1JA3101
COLORADO PL
,
------------~------
--
-----l--------
~
,
."
t
-.....
,
em
~
Illll(lIlJIItto
~
--~
.
~
:l
~ I
~~ ii.
I~ < ~
~. ~
I~U Ii
!
~
.~
~
"'pnl':ll~I".1
11.,,:,r.tj!,,!,fJI,
.lflllg'f,ll'
nrJm~llt!!ill
<(
o
3
J
:,'11"
.'1
,ii,
IIJ',
I',
. I
,
D
....
It
=>",
3z
()
It-
~....
;,4
It~
1':'-,
;>;W
-
- _.::I2OC:>OI
IJl'J'".I""
"'
_.
- A.3103_
-
o ENTRY VIE"" ON COLORADO
o INTERIOR COtJRT YARD VIEY't
-
-
(I) INTERIOR. PLAZA VIEI^I
J
I!i
~
~
~
~~
~@
y
"
~
I
~~ ~
ii ~
lili II
f
f.
.
"
e
~
l'I':lllilP,I'II~jr.11
'11.", J'I"ll
lit fi ,'"
tif.'i'i~ll!iii'l
",~,fiGIliI;,"1
<(] III I
0, fll,
> i IIJI
:>. .. I
....,; I",
i I
~
D
;::
w
::
w
>
i=
,l
w
IL
'"
Ii
w
IL
-
- 5eP.22004
2
LORAOO PL
~ @ --"",.
'llIIt_'" __... - ~310~
- ..
-
: ':i.::', ~
-6'1"'00'
___~r-t'
e
o DETAIL **.:2
~-:o'(,. ~Gtf"!Rg... I-.~~'"
. .UPtLt.oC;:;.-_.....
, .
. . --," .. "".-. '
! .... .' . -~- -...-
,,$"" . . '. ,-~'"".""" ,"
I"'....,;/t. '''''':4.;..-: ':';- ' -.... 'M".~::'-', - _"t...
._ _ .\1"" ~~~I/.,..
...1 __-...t.~'l!U"'~k: ...., ,':,;.~~
J.
"
o
~>~
.x., ~ _ . ,t1t4
"A.'. . """,'--lot., m .
YA r.1.' . .
. V.' .,m,if.
PHOTO REFEcC
l'l-Nc:.E '*;3
8 ""TAIL 04
o PET AIL =3
o DETAIL. ~I
0)
DETAIL #2-1
(0
PHOTO REFEREw
I~"""~ **2
tit
;
~
i
~~ !
< !
IR~ ~
l~~i! ~
I~.~ hi! ~
"~I'I"II
II,"",'! qn:d
VI"i" :11,"1"
~.,'.f!'Ir.l'I.".
ar.'I'" 'I~'I
MI.hGuU:lllI
c3! f: II
>' Jll.
>;,11'
...... I' ·
", '; .J.
! I
D
-'
-g
w
c
-
_~.2_
I/!r.l-$
- ..
""" -
~320L
-
""'"
".~......"'" .
-........
II
it
CD
DETAIL ELEVA.TION tt3
-
______~Pc.':::....
~
. ---~....
".:.'" :.' .~ . '. ~~~)
8
DETAIL ELEVATION ~l
....
o
PET.AlL ELEVATION "2
(:)
FHOTO REFERENGE 1:1
-.0 "'.!'-y".
~'i':P.il!T~1i;v)
---~..
~....
~\.~~=
o1:f.6tf
-
,
~
~
I
t ~
ih ~
l~~h;
!
~
~
.
~
"I~liJll'IIIII~11
"11",,11;,',0'
'!I::f!!;r.IH~;i
~fd!lI&~I!hll
. I
~ ~ I;q
Oq;!.
> i ,Ip
::> _ ~ t
"")".,/
, I
D
'"
J
..
I ~
I
.... 5I:l"'::I'2OO"
..... l/l..r-lt'
n
... 1lCn2 ...
--";.3202.,
-
-
1
r
"; M_ J!
I
B
..
=.
.....
....".
--
-
--
.......
1YPICAL UNIT _1000
-
:::i'
"'~.I'-o'
-"
--
!
I
".'
-
-
"".....,.,..,-,
n&.r.c"
1YPICAL UNIT _1400
--
~"
o
.-
r
I .-
...
.::;
~-'
-
-:
;
,
~
~
g I
2~ I ~
i!~ ~ ~
liU II :
":n;IWIIP,H:d
!I.q',hlr.~::t:l
'~I:'!~III!li"1
~&lmllil;.:1I
- . !
<( ~ I P,
O. '1.
; II !
:5: , I ! ! I
......, I, !
J ~ I
D
"'
~
..
l-
I.
:>
;t
\)
I ~
=-E6"~~
- ...p.r-Q'
- .,
- --
- ..3:;0':"
,
e
.
-.
.
MEMORANDUM
Development Services Department
DATE: December 17, 2003
TO: Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator
FROM: oG-Dan A. Lazo, Associate Civil Engineer
SUBJECT: Conditions of Approval for ADR 2003-040
161-175 Colorado Place, 78 Unit Senior Condominium Project
In response to your memorandum, the items which Engineering division has concern or
special knowledge are listed below:
1. The existing parkway widths are twelve feet on Colorado Place and twelve feet on
San Juan Drive.
2. According to record drawings. the subject property has an existing sewer lateral
connecting to the sewer main line on Colorado Place serving the subject project.
Developer shall contact Public Works Services Department to verify if the existing
sewer lateral is adequate for this development.
3. The City Traffic Engineer will prepare separate Conditions of Approval on traffic
related issues.
The following items are General Conditions of Approval for the subject project:
1. Submit grading and drainage plan prepared by a registered civil engineer subject
to the approval of the City Engineer. Provide calculations for both the gravity
drainage system and the pump drainage system (if applicable). Computations
should show hydrology, hydraulics, elevations, and all the details required on the
City's "Pump Drainage" sheet.
Note: Show all existing and proposed parkway trees, pull boxes, meters, power
poles. streetlights, driveways, sidewalks. and handicapped ramps on
grading/drainage plan.
-
,
.
e
.
Conditions of Approve.. .Jr ADR 2003-040
161-175 Colorado Place, 78 Unit Senior Condominium Project
December 17, 2003
Page 2
2. Submit separate erosion control plan to Public Works Services Department prepared
by registered civil engineer for City's approval.
3. Arrange for underground utility service, dedicate easements to utility companies
if needed, and inform the Development Services Department/Engineering
Division in writing of any such dedication prior to commencement of construction.
4. Arrange with the Southem Califomia Edison Company to install 1-22,000 lumen
HPSV on Colorado Place and 1-5,800 lumen HPSVon San Juan Drive, Edison-
owned (LS-1) streetlights with underground circuits. Exact locations to be
detennined by the City. Contractor shall obtain a lighting standard drawing 805-1
from the City's Engineering Division.
5. Existing parkway trees in good condition shall remain.
6. Close existing driveways not to be used and reconstruct curb, gutter, and
sidewalk to match existing.
7. Construct PCC sidewalk on San Juan Drive to match existing, as per Arcadia
City Standard Drawing.
8. Obtain approval from the Engineering Division prior to removal of any portion of
the existing curb and gutter.
g. No "tie backs" shall be constructed into the public right-of-way and adjacent
properties.
10. Construct six-inch (6") thick pec driveway apron(s) per Arcadia City Standard
Drawing No. S-10 or S-11. No driveway shall be constructed closer than three
feet (3') from any curb return, fire hydrant, ornamental light standard, telephone
or electrical pole, meter box, underground vault or manhole or tree.
NOTE: No portions of existing gutter and AC pavement shall be removed unless
prior approval is obtained from Development Services Director.
11. Gravity drainage outlets shall be constructed per Arcadia City Standard Drawing
No. S-11 or applicable APWA Standard Plan.
12. Remove and replace deficient .or damaged curb, gutter, sidewalk, parkway drains
and/or pavement to satisfaction of the City Engineer. Contact the Public Works
Inspector for exact locations of removal and replacement.
.
.
-
.
Conditions of Approva. .r ADR 2003-040
161-175 Colorado Place, 78 Unit Senior Condominium Project
December 17, 2003
Page 3
13. Obtain approval from the Building Division for assigned address(es) to be used
for subject development (including all units).
14. Paint address numbers on curb face per Arcadia City Standard Drawing No. S-
24.
15. Obtain permit for all work performed in public right-of-way. The Public Works
Inspector shall be contacted at least 24 hours prior to construction of off-site
improvements.
16.AII off-site improvements shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer prior to occupancy.
17.AII construction in the public right-of-way shall be in accordance with all
applicable sections and/or provisions of the latest edition of the "Standard
Specification for Public Works Construction" (Greenbook) and the City of
Arcadia's Standard Drawings.
18. The contractor shall comply with all requirements of Federal, State, and local
laws, and regulations pertaining to the CLEAN AIR AND CLEAN WATER ACT
and National pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Best
Management Practices (BMP).
19. New set boundary monuments as part of this subdivision must be inspected to
the satisfaction of the Los Angeles County Departmenf of Public Works with the
letter to the City prior to approval of the final map.
20. Prior to issuance of the certificate of completion for the project, all survey
monuments, centerline ties, and survey reference points shall be protected in
place or re-established where disturbed in accordance with Section Sn1 of the
Land Surveyors Act. This work will be the responsibility of the permittee and
shall be at the permittee's expense.
The above items are to be complied with to the satisfaction of the City Engineer in
accordance with the applicable provisions of the Arcadia Municipal Code.
cc: Greg Gerlach, Inspection Services Manager
Mark Omelas, Public Works Inspector
.
.
e
.
MEMORANDUM
Development Services Department
DATE: AprilS, 2004
TO: Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator
FROM: Ed Cline, Traffic Engineer ~
SUBJECT: ADR 2003-040-161/17S COLORADO PLACE
As requested, I have reviewed the revised plans for the proposed senior housing project
at 161/175 Colorado Place. My review was concentrated on the subterranean garage
circulation and amount of parking. My request for a traffic signal warrant analysis at
Colorado Place and San Juan Drive has been submitted and reviewed. The results of
my review are submitted on a separate memorandum dated April S, 2004.
The proposed project as revised consists of 78 condominium units with basement
parking. There are 152 standard parking spaces and six handicap parking stalls. There
are eight tandem parking spaces proposed. They are not included in the basic parking
stall count.
The revised plan appears to satisfy the City's Parking Code. The parking ratio as
submitted provides 2.03 spaces per unit. The parking space dimensions and drive aisle
width are very generous. The 30-foot drive aisle width would be beneficial to the senior
drivers.
Overall, the revised plan appears to have addressed the comments forwarded in my
December 1S, 2003 memorandum regarding this project.
EC:pa
cc: Philip A. Wray, City Engineer
.
e
.
MEMORANDUM
Development Services Department
DATE: AprilS, 2004
TO: Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator
FROM: Ed Cline, Traffic Engineer ;; ~ '
SUBJECT: TRAFFIC SIGNAL WARRANT ANAL YSIS,.....cOLORADO PLACE AND
SAN JUAN DRIVE
As requested. I have reviewed the Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis conducted at
Colorado Place and San Juan Drive. The study was done in conjunction with the
proposed senior housing project at 161/175 Colorado Place.
The study was conducted using widely accepted State of California traffic signal criteria.
Approach traffic on both streets was analyzed to determine if a traffic signal would be
. justified.
The report, prepared by Hartzog & Crabill, a consulting traffic-engineering firm,
concluded that a traffic signal at Colorado Place and San Juan Drive was not warranted.
Based on my review of the study, I concur with the results and conclusion. The report
also concluded that the proposed senior housing project would probably generate less
traffic during the critical commute periods than the existing motel on the property.
EC:pa
C?pV - Pi1/! tJrtlj
City of
Arcadia
Fire
Department
David Lugo
Fire Chief
e
.
PROJECT REQ~IREMENTS
Arcadia Fire Department-Fire Prevention Bureau
710 South Santa Anita Ave, Arcadia, CA 91006 Ph (626) 574-5104
Plan Check # ADR 03-040
Date. 12/19/03
Project Name 78 Unit Condo Complex
Project Address 161175 Colorado Place
Applicant Name JWDA
The following items listed below require correction before Fire Department
Approval can be obtained. All changes shall be made on the original drawing
(vellum). Pen or pencil corrections are not acceptable.
A. The basement parking garage and Recreation Room shall be protected by
an automatic fire sprinkler system per the City of Arcadia Fire Department
Commercial Sprinkler Standard. All residential units shall be protected by
an automatic fire sprinkler system per the City of Arcadia Fire Department
Single & Multi-Family Dwelling Sprinkler Standard.
B. All sprinkler systems shall be fully monitored.
C. Class I wet standpipes shall be installed in all stairwells serving the
basement up to the third floor and the south stairwell serving the first
floor up to the third floor.
D. Fire hydrants shall be installed at the following locations:
1. Adjacent to the front entrance drive on Colorado Place.
2. Adjacent to the entrance drive on San Juan Drive.
3. At an approved location on-site in the center court area
E. The access road to the center court shall be designated as a fire lane. A
minimum width of 20 feet and clearance height of 13 feet 6 inches must be
provided. Curbs shall be painted red and an adequate number of "NO
PARKING" signs shall be ~. The front entrance gate must be a
minimum 16 feet in width with a clearance height of 13 feet 6 inches.
F. Provide knox boxes and/or knox switches for access to restricted areas.
G. An adequate number of 2A:10BC fire extinguishers shall be provided at
locations approved by the fire inspector.
MEMORANDUM
Public Works Services Department
DATE:
DECEMBER 19, 2003
DONNA BUTLER, COMMUNiTY DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATOR
GARY F. LEWIS, GENERAL SERVICES MANAGER ~
TOM TAIT, FIELD SERVICES MANAGER ~
SUBJECT: ADR 2003-040 - PRELIMINARY REVIEW
161 -175 COLORADO PLACE
TO:
FROM:
PW - Sewer The submitted plans do not indicate any sewer system
improvements and connection to city collection pipeline. It is recommended that the
developer connects condominiums with multiple 6 Inch vCP laterals each with cleanout
at property line. Sewer collection pipeline in Colorado Place does not need any
capacity, improvements. Developer shall abandon existing not used services per PWSD
direction.
e
PW - Streets The developer will need to make upgrades to any broken sidewalk
Curb and gutter in the public right of way and install City owned street trees - 24" box
Deodar Cedar.
PW - Water The submitted plans do not indicate any water system
improvements and connection to city distribution pipeline. It is recommended that the
developer connect cond.ominiums with multiple master meters and dedicated fire
services.
PW - NPDES The developer will need to comply with the City's SUSMP
regulation and submit an approved SWPPP.
.
.
e
.
MEMORANDUM
Police Department
DATE: October 19, 2004
TO: Joe Lambert, Planning Dept.
FROM: Bob Sanderson, Police Dept. ~
SUBJECT: CUP 04-0 It & ADR03-040 161-175 Colorado Place
BACKGROUND
A proposed 78-unit senior condominium project with two levels of underground parking.
The police department has been asked to provide input with regard to crime prevention
and public safety.
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This project would replace the Elite Westerner Motel currently located at the proposed
project site. The Westerner Motel has been a location where many. drug related arrests
have taken place over the course of many years. The proposed project would most likely
reduce unlawful drug use at that location.
As the project is located adjacent the Santa Anita Race Track and two motels that are
within walking distance to this proposed project, some additional considerations with
respect to crime prevention and public safety should be made.
The building Itself should be outfitted with sufficient exterior lighting to dissuade criminals
from attempting to hide on the property to prey on a resident or visitor. There should be
no Jarge bush or shrubbery landscaping around the first floor or windows to the units that
could allow a criminal cover or concealment. The two levels of parking garage should be
equipped with 24-hour digitaVvideo recording closed circuit camera system that is also
monitored by a security service. Emergency phones and alanns should be installed in the
parking garage to afford residents and visitors the ability to either call for assistance or just
push an a1ann button to summon help. This a1ann system should be monitored by an alann
company or on-site security service. The garage entrance should have an electronically
controlled security gate. If the main entrance( s) are controlled by an electronically
.
e
.
controlled security gate, the police and fire departments will need access codes for
immediate access.
The complex manager should work with the police department to establish a specific
neighborhood watch program for the development to raise awareness for personal safety
in and around the complex.
.
e
.
NEGATIVE DECLARATION (DRAFT)
1. Name, if any, and a brief description of project:
Application Nos. CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040: A Conditional Use Permit and Architectural Design
Review Application to construct a 78-unit senior housing project at the subject location.
2, Location:
161 Colorado Place, City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles
3, Entity or person undertaking project:
Michael Sun (JWDA Architects)
529 E. Valley Blvd. Suite 228-A
San Gabrie/;CA 91776
(626) 288.9199
The Planning Commission, having reviewed the Initial Study of this proposed project and having
reviewed the written comments received prior to the publiC meeting of the Planning Commission,
including the recommendation of the City's Staff, does hereby find and declare that the proposed project
will not have a significant effect on the environment. A brief statement of the reasons supporting the
Planning Commisslon/City Council's findings are'as follows:
The proposed use is consistent with the zoning and General Plan land use designation of the
project site and will not have a significant effact upon the environment.
The Planning Commission hereby finds that the Negative Declaration reflects its independent judgment.
A copy of the Initial Study may' be obtained at:
City of Arcadia Development Services Department
Community Development Division
240 W. Huntington Drive
Arcadia, 91007
(626) 574-5423
The location and custodian of the documents and any other material which constitute the record of
proceedings upon which the City based its decision to adopt this Negative Declaration are as follows:
City of Arcadia Development Services Department
Community Developmetil Division
240 W. Huntinglon Drive
Arcadia, 91007
(626) 574-5423
.Jo:;e1f{ 1..(. V/lI1f!e:1Z.:(
Staff
Date Received for Filing
Neg Dee
7/02
.
e
.
File No. CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. Project Title:
Application Nos. CUP 04-013 & ADR 03-040
2. Project Address (Location)
161 Colorado Place, in the City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles
3. Project Sponsor's Name, Address & Telephone Number:
Michael Sun (JWDA Architects)
529 E. Valley Blvd. Suite 228-A
San Gabriel, CA 91776
(626) 288-9199
4. Lead Agency Name & Address:
City of Arcadia - Development SeNices Department
Community Development Division -- Planning SeNices
240 W. Huntington Drive
Post Office Box 60021
Arcadia, CA 91066-6021
5. Lead Agency Contact Person & Telephone Number:
Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator (626) 574-5442
6. General Plan Designation:
Commercial
7. Zoning Classification:
C-2
-1-
CEOA Env. Checklist Part 1,7/02
.
e
.
File No. CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
8. Description of Project:
Application Nos. 04-013 & ADR 03-040: A Conditional Use Permit and Architectural
Design Review Application to construct a 78-unit senior housing project at the
subject location.
9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting: (Briefly describe the project's
surroundings.)
The properties to the north are zoned R-t and are developed with single-family
residences. The property to the south is zoned S-t and is the Santa Anita
Racetrack. The property to the west is zoned C-2 and is developed with a
restaurant. The property to the east is zoned C-2 and is developed with an office
building.
10. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits, financing
approval, or participation agreement):
N/A
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this
project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" as
indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
[ ] Aesthetics
[ ] Biological Resources
[ ] Geology/Soils
[ ] HydrologylWater Quality
[ ] Mineral Resources
[ ] PopUlation & Housing
[ ] Recreation
[ ] Utilities and Service Systems
[ ] Mandatory Findings of Significance
[ ] Air Quality
[ ] Cultural Resources
[ ] Hazards & Hazardous Materials
[ ] Land Use & Planning
[ ] Noise
[ ] Public Ser:vices
[ ] Transportation / Circulation
DETERMINATION (To be completed by the Lead Agency)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
[Xl I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the
environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
-2-
CEQA Env. Chacklist Pari 1, 7/02
.
e
.
File No. CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
[ ]
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the
mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the
project. A NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
[] I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the
environment, an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
[] I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment,
but that at least one effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document
pursuant to applicable legal standards and has been addressed by mitigation
measures based on that earlier analysis 1:jS described on attached sheets, and if
any remaining effect is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially
Significant Unless Mitigated," an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is
required, but it only needs to analyze the effects that have not yet been
addressed.
[ ]
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the
environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all
potentially significant effects have been analyzed adequately in an earlier
Environmental Impact Report pursuant to applicable standards and have been
avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation
measures that are imposed upon the proposed project.
By: Donna Butler, Community Development Administrator
For: The City of Arcadia - Development Services Department
Signatu~~
Joseph M. Lambert
Printed Name
October 12, 2004
Date
Donna L. Butler
For
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1. A brief explanation is required for all answers except "No Impact" answers that are adequately
supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question.
{\ "No Impact" answer is adequa.tely supported If the referenced information sources show that the
impact simply does not apply to projects such as the one involved (e.g., the project is not within a
fault rupture zone). A "No Impacf' answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific
factors as well as general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to
pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis).
-3-
CEaA Env. Checklist Part 1,7/02
.
e
.
File No. CUP 04-014& ADR 03-040
2. All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site,
cumulative as well as project:level, indirect as well as direct, and construction related as well as
operational impacts.
3. "Potentially Significant Impacf' is appropriate If there Is substantial evidence that an effect is
significant. If there are one or more, "Potentially Significant Impacf' entries when the determination is
made, an Environmental Impact Report is required.
4. "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated" applies where the incorporation of mitigation
measures has reduced an effect from "Potenllally Significant Impact" toa "Less Than Significant
Impact." The lead agency must dascribe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they
reduce the effect to a less than significant level (mitigallon measures from Section 17 "Earlier
Analyses" may be cross-referenced):
5. Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program Environmental Impact Report,
or other CECA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or Negative
Declaration {Section 15063(c)(3)(D)}. Eariier analyses are discussed in Section 17 at the end of the
checklist.
a) Earlier Analyses Used: Identify and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the
scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on
the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are "Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures
Incorporated," describe the mitigation measures that were incorporated or refined from the
earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
6. Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist, references to information sources
for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or
outside document should, where appropriate, Include a reference to the page or pages where the
statement is substantiated.
7. Supporting Information Sources. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or
individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion.
8. The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) The significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) The millgation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than Significant.
-4-
CEQA Env. Checklist Part 1,7102
File No.: CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
. Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mlllgatlon Impact Impact
Incorporation
1. AESTHETICS - Would the project
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? 0 D D fZI
b) S'ubstantially damage scenic resources, incluqing, but not limited 0 0 0 ~
to, trees, rock outcroppihgs. and historic buildings within a state
scenic highway?
e
.
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of
the site and its surroundings?
o
fZI
o
D
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would
adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
o
~
o
D
The proposed project consists of a conditional use permit and design review to construct an approximate
86.000 square foot senior condominium projecl featuring 78 residential units. The project site is currently
developed with a 60.room hotel that would be razed subsequent to approval of this project. The project site is
surrounded by commercial land uses to the south. west and east and single-family residential land uses to the
north on Santa Cruz Road. The proposed project was subject to an Architectural Design Review process and
has met or exceeded the city's standadrds for design and development standards. As such, no adverse
impacl on aesthetics isantic/pated.
2.
AGRICULTURE RESOURCES - In determining whether impacts
to agriculture resources are significant environmental effects, lead
agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation
and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California
Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing
impacts on agriculture and farmland. Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of
Statewide Importance (Farmland) to non-agricultural use? (The
Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program in the California
Resources Agency to non-agricultural use?
fZI
o
o
o
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson
Act contract?
o
~
D
D
c)
Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to
their location or nature, could result In conversion of Farmland to
non-agricultural use?
o
fZI
D
o
CEOA Checklist
5
7/02
.
.
e
.
File No.: CUP 04-014 & ADR03-040
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
No
Impact
Less Than
Slgnlftcant
Impact
The proposal is consistent with the Commercial land use designation of the General Plan, is a conditionally
approved use in the C-2 zone, and is required to comply with the regulations of any other jUrisdictional agency
with applicable environmental regulations. The. project site is surrounded by urban uses and no agricultural
resources currently exist ai the project site or in the surrounding areas. As such, the proposal will have no
impacts on agricultural resources.
3. AIR QUALITY - Where available, the significance criteria
established by the applicable air quality management or air
pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following
determinations. Would the project:
a)
Conflict with or obstruct Implementation of the applicable air
quality plan?
b)
Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantiaily to an
existing or projected air quality violation? .
c)
Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria
pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an
applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including
releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for
ozone precursors)?
e) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations?
f) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of
people?
o
o
~
o
o
o
~
o
o
o
~
o
o
o
o
~
o
o
o
~
The proposed project consists of a conditional use permit and design revie.w to construct an approximate
86,000 square foot senior condominium project featuring 78 residential units. The project site is currently
developed with a 60-room hotel that would be razed subsequent to approval of this project. The project site is
surrounded by commercial land uses to the south, west and east and single-family residential land uses to the
north on Santa Cruz Road. The proposed construction and continued us~ of the site will be in accordance with
local air quality regulations as administered by the South Coast Air Quality Management District. As such, no
adverse impacts are anticipated.
4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a)
Have a substantial adverse Impact, either directly or through
habitat modifications. on any species identified as a candidate,
sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans,
policies. or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish
and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
o
o
o ~
CEOA Checklist
6
7/02
.
ef)
.
File No.: CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
b) Have a substantial adverse impact on any riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans,
policies, and regulations or by the Califomia Department of Fish
and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetl'!nds
as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including but
not limited to , marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
removal, filling, hydrological Interruption or other means?
d)
Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with established resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of wildlife nursery
sites?
e)
Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation
Plan, Natural Conservation Community Plan, or other approved
local, regional or state habitat conservation plan?
Potentially
Significant
Impact.
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant No
Impact Impact
o
[gJ
o
[gJ
o
[gJ
o
~
The proposed project consists of a conditional use permit and design review to construct an approximate
86,000 square foot senior condominium project featuring 78 residential units, The project site is surrounded by
commercial land uses to the south, west and east and single-family residential land uses to the north on Santa
Cruz Road. The project site is currently developed with a 60-room hotel that would be rezed subsequent to
approval of this projec/. As such, the proposal will have no impacts on biological resources.
5. CULTURAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a
historical resource as defined in !i 15064.5?
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
archaeological resource pursuant to !i 15064.5?
c) Directly or Indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or
site or unique geologic feature?
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of
formal cemeteries?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
[gJ
o
[gJ
o
[gJ
o
[gJ
CEQA Checklist
7
7/02
.
e
.
File No,: CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Slgnlflcant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
The proposed project consists of a conditional use permit and design review to construcl an approximate
86,000 square foot senior condominium project featuring 78 residential units. The project site Is surrounded by
commercial land uses to the south, west and east and single-family residantialland uses to the north on Santa
Cruz" Road. The project sita is currently developed with a 60-room hotel that would be razed subsequent to
approval of this project. As such, no adverse impacts on cultura/resources are anticipated.
Ii. GEOLOGY AND SOilS - Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the
most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map
issued by the State"Gaologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of
Mines and Geology Special Publication 42.
Ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
ill) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
v) Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would
become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result
in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or coliapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil as defined in Table 18-1-B of the
Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or
property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic
tanks or altemative waste water disposal systems where sewers
are not available for the disposal of waste water?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
~
IZI
~
~
~
IZI
IZI
~
~
CEQA Checklist
8
7/02
.
e
.
Fil.e No.: CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
SignifiCant
With
Mitigation
IncorporaUon
No
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
While this entire region is subject to the effects of seismic activity, the subject location has not been determined
to be especially susceptible to any of the above geological or soil problems. The site is essentially flat land,
and is not within an area subject to inundation, subsidence, or expansion of soils. The proposed project
consists ora conditional use perinit and design review to construct an approximate 86,000 square foot senior
condominium project featuring 78 residential units. The project site is surrounded by commercial land uses to
the south, west and easl and single-family residential land uses to' the north on Santa Cruz Road. The project
site is currently developed with'a 60-room hotel that would be razed subsequent to approval of this project. All
new construction shall be required to comply with all applicable building and safety codes. As such, no
adverse impacts are anticipated.
7. VII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS - Would the
project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment
through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazandous
materials?
b)
Create a significant hazard to the publiC; or t~e environment
through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions
involving the release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
c) emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely
hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter
mile of an existing or proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous
materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would It create a significant hazard to
the public or the environment?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety
hazard for people residing or working In the project area?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in
the project area?
g)
Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
o
o
~
o
o
o
o
~
o
o
IZI
o
o
o
~
o
o
o
IZI
o
o
o
IZI
o
o
o
o IZI
CECA Checklist
9
7/02
.
.
e
.
File No.: CUP 04-014 & ADR03-040
h) Expose people or structures to a sigificant risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are
adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed
with wildlands?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
o
Less Than
Significant
With
MiUgation
Incorporation
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
No
Impact
181
The proposed project consists of a conditional use permit and design review to construct an approximate
86,000 square foot senior condominium project featuring 78 residential units. The project site is surrounded by
commercial land uses to the south, west and east and single-family residential land uses to the north on Santa
Qruz Road. The project site is currently developed with a 60-room hotel that would be razed subsequent to
approval ofthis project. All new construction shall be required to comply with all applicable building and safety
codes. The proposal will be in compliance with emergency access and fire safety regulations. As such, no
adverse impacts are anticipa/ed.
8. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY - Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
b)
Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be
a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local
groundwater table level (I.e., the production rate of pre-existing
nearby wells would drop to a level Which would not support
existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been
granted)?
c) Substantialiy alter the existing drainage pattem of the site or area,
inCluding through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,
in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation
on- or off"site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattem of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river,
or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a
manner which would result In flooding on- or off-site?
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity
of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide
substantial additional sources of polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
181
181
~
~
~
~
CEQA Checklist
10
7/02
.
File No.: CUP 04-014 & AD~ 03-040
. Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact MItigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
g) Place housing within a 1 DO-year flood hazard area, as mapped on 0 0 0 [8J
a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or
other flood hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 1 OO-yearfloodplaln structures which would impede 0 0 0 ~
or redirect flood flows?
I) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or 0 0 0 [8J
death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the
failure ofa levee or dam?
j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami or.mudflow? 0 0 0 ~
.k) Potential impact of projecl.construction on storm water runoff? 0 0 0 [8J
e f) Potential impact of project post-construction activity on storm 0 0 0 ~
water runoff?
m Potential for discharge of storm water from areas from material 0 0 0 [8J
storage, vehicle or equipment maintenance (Including washing),
waste handling, hazardous materials handling or storage, delivery
areas or loading docks, or other outdoor work areas?
n) Potential for discharge of storm water to cause significant harm 0 0 0 [8J
on the biological integrity of the waterways and water bodies?
0) Potential for discharge of storm water to impair the beneficial 0 0 0 [8J
uses of the receiving waters or areas that proVide water quality
benefit?
p) Potential for significant changes in the flow velocity or volume of 0 0 0 [8J
storm water runoff that can use environmental harm?
q) Potential for significant Increases in erosion of the project site or 0 0 0 [8J
surrounding areas?
.
CEOA Checklist
11
7/02
..
File No.: CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
.
Potentially
Significant
impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
IncolpOfOUon
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
The proposed project consists of a conditional usa parmit and .design reviaw to construct an approximate
86,000 square foot senior condominium project featuring 78 residential units. The project site is currently
developed with a 60-room hotel Ihat would be razed subsequent to approval of this project. All new
construction shall be required to comply with all applicable building and safety codes. As the site is currently
developed, there will be little change to the existing drainage and runoff generated by the project site. As such,
no adverse impacts are anticipated.
9. LAND USE AND PLANNING - Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
o
o
o
~
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of
an agency with jurisdiction over the projact (including, but not
limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or
zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or
mitigating an environmental effect?
o
o
o
IZI
c)
Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural
community conservation plan?
o
o
o
IZI
e
The proposal is consistent with the Commercial land use designation of tha General Plan and with the
regulations of the C-2 zone, and is required to comply with the regulations of any other juriSdictional agency
with applicable environmental regulations. The proposed project consists of e conditional use permit and
design review to construct an approximate 86,000 square foot .senior condominium project featuring 78
residential units. The project site is currently developed with a 6o-room hotel that would be razad subsequent
to approval of this project. The proposal is consistent with the Commercial land lJse designation of the General
Plan, and is a conditionally approved use in the C-2 zone. As such, no adverse impacts are anticipated.
10. MINERAL RESOURCES - Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that 0 0 0 IZI
would be of value .to the region .and the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important minerai 0 0 0 [gJ
resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, speCific
plan or other land use plan?
No mineral resources are known to exist at the site. As such, no adverse impacts are anticipated.
11. NOISE - Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise
ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies?
o
D.
[gJ
o
. b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne
o
o
~ 0
CEQA Checklist
12
7102
.
e
.
File No.: CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
vibration or groundborne noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase In ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in anibient noise
levels in the project vicin~y above levels existing without the
project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where
such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public
airport or public use airport, would the project expose people
residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the
project expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Slgnlflcant
With
Mitigation
Incorporation
No
Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
!81
o
o
o
!81
o
o
o
~
o
o
o
~
o
There will be a short-term increase in noise lavels due to construction an the site. Once the construction is
completed, it is anticipated that although the noise faclor would increase with the net gain of 18 dwelling units
on the site, however Ihis noise will be the type of noise associated with residential neighborhoods and should
not significantly adversely impacl any of tha neighboring properties. As such, the impact shall be less than
significant.
12.
POPULATION AND HOUSING - Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for
example. by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly
(for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating
the construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
o
o
o
~
o
o
~
o
o
o
o
~
The proposed project is consistent with Ihe Commercial land use designation of the General Plan which allows
senior residential units with an approved Conditional Use Permit at the projecl site. The General Plan
encourages sanior housing in designated areas as it helps address the housing needs identified by the
General Plan. Also, the population,gain which may resuit from the proposed project has been addressed in the
1996 General Plan update. The project will not craateany significant impact upon popUlation or housing. As
such, the impact shall be less than significant.
PUBLIC SERVICES - Would the project:
CEQA Checlllist
13
7/02
.
e
.
,
File No.: CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
a) Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need
for new or physically altered governmental facilities. the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response
times or other performance objectives for any of the public
services:
Fire protection?
Police protection?
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
PotenUally
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
MlfigaUon
IncorporaUon
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
The proposed project Is consistent with the Commercial land use designation of the General Plan which allows
senior residential units with an approved Condilional Use Permit at Ihe projecl site. To address potential pUblic
safety impacts, staff recommends that a closed circuit" television camera be installed as a securily measure
wltl!in the underground parking garage, and that the parking garaga areas shall be adequalely lighted. This
shall be incorporated as a condition of approval of the related Conditional Use Permit. As such, the impacts
shall be less than significant.
14.
RECREATION - Would the project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or
other recreational facilities such that substantial physical
deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the
construction or expansion of recreational facilities which have .an
adverse physical effect on the environment?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
~
~
~
~
~
o
~
Tha proposed project is consistent with the Commercial land use designation of the General Plan which allows
senior residential units with an approved Conditional Use Permit at the project site. The population gain which
may result from the proposed project has been addressed in the 1996 General Plan update. Also, the project
as proposed includes a 2,000 square foot recreation room and outdoor recreation areas. Therefore, the
project will not create any significant adverse impact upon recreation services.
15. TRANSPORTATIONITRAFFIC- Would the project:
a)
Cause an increase In traffic which is substantial in relation to the
existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in
a substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the
volume to capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)?
o
o
~
o
o
o
o
o
o
~
CEQA Checklist
14
7/02
.
f)
e g}
.
File No.: CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
b} Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service
standard established by the county congestion management
agency for designated roads or highways?
c}
Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an
increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in
substantial safety risks?
d)
Substantiaily Increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g.,
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses
(e.g., farm eqUipment)?
e)
Result in inadequate emergency access?
Result in inadequate parking capacity?
Conflict with adopted policies, plans or programs supporting
alternative transportation (e.g., bus turnouts, bicycle racks)?
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
Significant With Significant No
Impact Mitigation Impact Impact
Incorporation
0 0 0 lZJ
o
o
o
~
o
o
o
lZJ
o
o
o
~
o
d
121
o
o
o
o
121
The proposed project is consistent with the Commercial/and use designation of the General Plan which allows
senior residential units with an approved Conditional Use Permit at the project site. The applicant has
submitted a traffic impact analysis and the City's Traffic Engineer has determined that no additional traffic
signals are needed and that no other major public improvements are neccessary as part of this projec/. Part of
the conditional use permit process will include an analysis of the parking situation and a determination by staff
on the adequacy of parking. As such, the impacts if any, are less than significan/.
16. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project:
a} Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable
Regional Water Quality Control Board?
b} Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater
treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the
construction of which could cause significant environmental
effects?
c}
Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage
facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of
which could cause significant environmental effects?
o
o
o
~
o
o
o
121
o
o
o ~
CEOA Checklist
15
7/02
.
e
.
File No.: CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project frpm
existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded
entitlements needed? In making this determination, the City shali
consider whether the project is subject to the water supply
assessment requirements of Water Code Section 10910, et seq.
(SB 610), and the requirements of Govemment Code Section
664737 (SB221).
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider
which serves or may serve the project determined that It has
adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand In
addition to the provider's existing commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
g)
Comply with federal, state and local statues and regulations
related to solid waste?
Polendally
Slgnlflcanl
Impact
o
o
o
o
less Than
Significant
With
Mitigalion
Incorporation
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
No
Impact
~
~
~
~
The proposed project. is consislent with the Commercial land use designation of the General Plan which allows
senior residential units with an approved Conditional Use Permit at the project site. The proposed project shall
be subject to all applicable wastewater and NPDES requlremants. As such, no adverse impacts are
enticipated.
17. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining leveis, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California history or prehistory?
b Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means
that the incremental effects of a proJect are considerable when
viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects
of other current projects, and the effects of probable future
projects)?
c)
Does the project have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects'on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
~
IZI
o IZI
CEOA Checklist
16
7/02
.
.
e
.
~
File No.: CUP 04-014 & ADR 03-040
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
IncOrporation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
The proposed project is consistent with the Commercial land use designation of the General Plan which allows
senior residential units with an approved Conditional Use Permit at the project site. The conditional use permit
shall not resull in cumulative impacts to the surrounding neighborhood or limit the future development of the
neighborhood. As such. no adverse impacts are anticipated.
CEQA Checklist
17
7/02
"
~f. 04-;4
_.
.
CITY OF ARCADIA
240 WEST HUNTINGTON DRIVE
ARCADIA, CA 91007
(626) 574-5400
ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION FORM
Date Filed:
General Information
1. Name and address of developer or project sponsor:
y",e -r "'''' GJ-.","j H = ~~-t~~", ?YOjP<~ T 14 j,.-Pc-fI4'P"-{ L LC
AA.(ress . re;, f3,,~ 1462 AJ{o,d._. E;/'. ql"?? /"1 ".:>..
2. Address of project (Location):
I hi
[of"",rlAJn
ArUJ. n{. ,CA '1{. o"}
..... .
r>L
,
Name, address and telephone number of person to be contacted concerning this project:
H70~",,,,f ~...'" JiNl>A (6)6) obi'/., it 111
. .
f ",,-t~;d:. YotVlj i1~t>A ~>q. "G. I",,,,fl,y' 9fvPi. <:;";ie .>.t.r-A
SA~ Cr"k~1 cPt _ "'T J JJ (,.
4.
List and describe any other related permits and other public approvals required for this
project, including those required by city, regional, state and federal agencies:
L-ej"'-I.,J,2sd';f"'.,ol\ "Show... 17V1 '7he-e-t A.I""\
5. Zoning: Ay, ~yy
6.
General Plan Designation: S"e",; or H.....,;^)
Proiect DescriDtion
7. Proposed use of site (project description):
7~ L1~;15 <€I<;~" C;-r;7.P'1 (I"'h J.IfA:n:",,,,,,
Site Size: 7 t J ~ 7 3 Sq. Ft. I
I 75(
, .
Acre(s)
I:
Square footage per building:
'6 6,;;).0-00 ~ F.
10. Number of floors of construction:
I1tA5flfll,x -+ ~ FII:7or.
11. Amount of off-street parking provided:
rfOfle. .
12. Proposed scheduling of project:
......"" I .
~. ..... c:.u.f.( H&'-'y(;t,. 0 o"'t ---t..J~r~;j Jr/I...W':J
13. Associated projects:
tV"" 0(
IJlA.J".70'~, Collli'fn...ct;o"l
I '/
14. Anticipated incremental development:
e A/ o-t 'VP~I
15. If residential, include the number of units, schedule of unit sizes, range of sale prices or
rents, and type of household sizes expected:
7'b W1i1~. IJ}I,-(, ...,;:z~ sh...m on 4e.-{, A ~.;foL <7'",(e ;r;,e IVIA.
16. If commercial, indicate the type, Le. neighborhood, city or regionally oriented, square
footage of sales area, and loading facilities, hours of operation:
/l/'rf rVIAAIII1(I'U'oV I
17. If industrial, indicate type, estimated employment per shift, and loading facilities:
A./o-{ ;"',{....,Oo/. (
18.
o .
If institutional, indicate the major function, estimated employment per shift, estimated
occupancy, loading facilities, and community benefits to be derived from the project:
J./ rrf i h s-f/'''t'... -r; '''<t-(
19. If the project involves a variance, conditional use permit or zoning application, state this
and indicate clearly why the application is required:
. Tho( hyo~...rl dn~<;Hr( ;l.l,ohc ..... ....... 'AVO,." c.:>V/,."{.-..,.,,,..JL \.Is.e 01- ~"'''1
I J ' V
o./rf; '..................
EnvironlnfllForm -2- 4/01
.0. Are the following items applicable to the project or its effects?
checked yes (attach additional sheets as necessary).
~NO
o ~ 21.
o (a 22.
o B 23.
o 13 24.
o ~ 25.
o ~ 26.
0 5l 27.
0 ~ 28.
eo 14 29.
D ~ 30.
D Gj 31.
D I:a. 32.
o CiJ 33.
Discuss below all items
Change in existing features of any hills, or substantial alteration of ground
contours.
Change in scenic views or vistas from existing residential areas or public
lands or roads.
Change in pattern, scale or character of general area of project.
Significant amounts of solid waste or litter.
Change in dust, ash, smoke, fumes or odors in vicinity.
Change in ground water quality or quantity, or alteration of existing drainage
patterns.
Substantial change in existing noise or vibration levels in the vicinity.
Is site on filled land or on any slopes of 10 percent or more?
Use or disposal of potentially hazardous materials, such as toxic substances,
flammable or explosives
Substantial change in demand for municipal services (police, fire, water,
sewage, etc.)
Substantial increase in fossil fuel consumption (electricity, oil, natural gas,
etc.)
Relationship to a larger project or series of projects
Has a prior environmental impact report been prepared for a program, plan,
policy or ordinance consistent with this project?
o ca 34. If you answered YES to question no. 33, may this project cause significant
effects on the environment that were not examined in the prior EIR?
Environmental Settina
35. Describe (on a separate sheet) the project site as it exists before the project, including
information on topography, soil stability, plants and animals, any cultural, historical or
scenic aspects. Describe any existing structures on the site, and the use of the
structures. Attach photographs of the site. (Snapshots or Polaroid photos will be
. accepted.) 'T~e. s<>; I ,~ s~Q\~le. Th~re "",I-e It" f(Iil't't~ J)"f:",A(~. ,,,,(-(,,,~,,,1. /.,fS'(~'
or .;;...c>1;t 0<5.tPc'l5 0" -t~ .;~{l. ~l"i-r('~q S-1.r~d"".( "3 '^- ~oid CI;f;'t't Jf1~
bl1o-t"~ -:$~ow" "'"' rk.,.<>b"AYA J ......-"'-.
r .. I Wo ~'Yg"
EnllircnlnfoForm -3- 4/01
.
~
'S. Describe (on a separate sheet) the surrounding properties, including information on
plants, animals, any cultural, historical or scenic aspects. Indicate the type of land uses
(residential, commercial, etc.), intensity of land use (one-family, apartment houses,
shops. department stores, etc.), and scale of development (height, frontage, set-backs,
rear yards, etc.). Attach photographs of the vicinity. Snapshots or Polaroid photos will
be accepted. there ttl'e no eM J-r",rll\./ ,it;s-i...-t(v..,( "r > L4!~: ( '" Sr((.:t.; i VI tt...e
C rt'f" t' '"'7IA'/''''''''".{''"0 rrorey-f;e> rh,,1,,~ ~h'\"'N'1 Ok pl1o-1o b.M..,(
e I lea Ion j , . . "
I hereby certify that the statements furnished above and in the attached exhibits present the
data and information required for this initial evaluation to the best of my ability, and that the
facts, statements, and information presented are true and correct to the best of my knowledge
and belief.
Date Iff I ..f
. ?,"^~Js" p:.
(Signature) '.
For 'r~ e 1- 0. V' G iI. A of j
e
,
EnvlronlnfoForm
-4-
4101