The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About0863 '. . . . RESOLUTION NO. 863 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING CO~~ISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR AN OUTDOOR EATING ESTABLISHMENT AT 31 EAST HUNTINGTON DRIVE. WHEREAS, on August 26, 1974, Jose and Viola Solis filed an application for an outdoor eating establishment, Planning ~epartment Case No. 74-17, on the property commonly known as 31 East Huntington Drive, more particularly described as follows: Lot 8, Block 74, Arcadia Santa Anit.a Tract, City of Arcadia, County of Los Angeles, State of California, as per map recorded in Book IS, Page 89 6f Maps in the office of the Los Angeles County Recorder. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on said matter on 4It September 10, 1974, at which time all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That the factual data submitted by the Planning Department in the attached staff report is presumed to be true and correct. SECTION 2. This Commission finds that: 1. The granting of a conditienal use permit as herein- after provided will not be detrimental to the public health or welfare or injurious to the property or improvements in such zone or vicinity. . -1- 863 . . . . . .. . 2. The use applied for at the location indicated is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized. 3. The site for the proposed use is adequate in size, and shape to accommodate said use, and all yards, parking, loading, landscaping and other features required to adjust said use with the land and uses in the neighborhood. 4. The site abuts streets and highways ad.equate in width and pavement type to carry the kind of traffic generated by the proposed use. S. The granting of such conditional use permit will not advers,ely affect the General Plan. 6. The use applied for will not have a substantial adverse impact on the environment. SECTION 3. That for the foregoing reasons, subject to approval of the City Council, this Commission grants a conditional use permit for an outdoor eating establishment upon the, following condi tions: 1. The property shall be improved and maintained in accordance with the plans which are on ~ile in the subject Case No. C.D.P. 74-17. 2. That all signs shall comply with code requirements. 3. The trash area shall be enclosed on at least three sides by a five (S) foot high solid impact, resis,tant wall constructed of easily cleanable material. -2. 863 " . . . . . . SECTION 4. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a copy to be forwarded to the City Council of the City of Arcadia. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 24th day of September, 1974, by the fOllowing vote: AYES: NOES: Commissioners Clark, Hegg, Huddy, Kliyper, Reiter, Coghlan None ABSENT: Commissioner Livingston ATTEST: w~~ Secretary ~~rJif~' - - 3- 863, . . . '. . . September 10, 1974 TO: PLANNING DEPARTMENT FROM: PLANNING COMMISSION SUBJECT: C. U . P. 74-17 31 EAST HUNTINGTON DRIVE APPLICATION This application was filed on August 26, 1974 by Jose and Viola Solis and requests a conditional use permit to operate an outdoor eating establishment at 31 East Huntington Drive. PRESENT LAND USE AND ZONING The subject property is zoned C-C D & H, and is presently developed with a brick building,. On the same site is the Steerburger Restaurant. Surrounding properties are also zoned C-C D & H and are developed with commercial and office uses. The rear of the subject property abuts an alley. To the north of the alley is a public parking lot. HISTORY An outdoor eating establishment previously occupied the sub- ject building. Although an outdoor eating establishment is a conditional uSe in a C-C zone, the business was a noncon- forming use because it did not have a conditional use permit. According to the Arcadia Municipal Code, Chapter 9249, any nonconforming use which is not actively participated in for 90 days is considered discontinued. The former occupant closed in March, 1974. pant was not permitted to reopen in August, conditional use permit. Thus, a new occu- 1974, without a PROPOSAL AND ANALYSIS The applicant proposes to utilize an existing building to conduct an outdoor eating es tablishment. The subject building, which was formerly utilized for a similar business, contains 328 ~q. ft. of floor area. The interior of the structure would be used solely for food preparation space. ~ ~'-' (U}'q,1.> ~ . . '.-1 I . C.U.P. 74-17 2 Customers would place orders and be served at an existing stainless steel counter which runs around part of the building's perimeter. Stools will probably be provided along the counter. The pa,rking lot in the rear of the property has spaces marked for four cars. Because the lot is shared with the adjoining eating establishment this does not meet parking requirements. However, parking needs are met by the public parking facility located on the other side of the alley. In addition, it is expected that most customers will not park specifically for the eating establishment, but will be customers and employees of the adjoining businesses. Pursuant to the provision of the California Environmental Quality Act, the Planning Department reviewed the proposed conditional use permit and determined that the proposal would not have a significant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration has been prepared and filed for this project. . The Planning Commission in its approval or denial of the proposed conditional use permit must make the determination that t,he proposed project would or would not have a substan- tial adverse impact on the environment. RECOMMENDATION The Planning Department recommends approval of C.U.P. 74-17 subject to the following conditions: 1. All signs coftform to code requirements. 2. The trash area shall be enclosed on at least three sides by a S foot high solid impact resistant wall constructed of easily cleanable material. PLANNING DEPARTHENT ~c2,~ LISA A. GRAY ASSISTANT PLANNER LAG:db . Attachments r J> z Q C lJI fTI i' N o Z :z:. G\ / ~g ~ ~ " ~ ~ l l> " ~: -, - ~ ill PUE LIe pt Rkl NG '" - "7 ~ l < ,. . L I W . ~ I c-c D~~ I I ~ I I U\~ I I I J- Ill" (17J I (2.'ll ~ (37) @,-s) I I CSO GS) c.t) Q'f) ~ I &.:$ (2$) (+0 0:: !!' (IS) I I C$. - 50 SO 1.512.5 So So so So +0 $'.01 .-t.. LL. :;,up'\:l'I='-T ~ '31 W, HUN:tINc..TON HUNTINGTON ('\ C \l -..I .A I -J ~~ so so so 50 4'l.7I 50 50 S"o So SD 1.51 2.) I'I-~~t<f (14-) 0") ~~~cj ('2.'J t;c) ~z.-:54) ~"-1~ (+4-) ~.~ .... Ct~ ($'f3 ,.. I r--~,44 '-!' I.I\'Q' I '^ U\c ~H I '" c... ~( v D ~ . I'-- I 1ItN' I lI\ IIlc I '" I 1 Ia I 1 I I _ - .. rF- :'6- H ... ... I ... Ul'iiO' I 1.1\<::, I I .. I - . - ... 1 -. - tJ.. 1 . I I . . . P I.IBL./ C PARI<IN4 LOT . ALLEY q' ....." ~ """ ,~ eY ,0 50 ASPHALT R4RKINCj ~ .. 'TRAS...t '" (NOT E^"C.L05eD~ , ~ .; '<ALE ..t5"'.../b" ;::~:~:r;.~.~;'~::~i:~' ~:';:.~:::: ~ oJ ~ ""AN""'" 'fJ~1 PLAN7J'M7 '5' ~ ;~~.':~ 0 ." c) ~ ~ ~ 0 ; a <i ~ " ~ , " ~ I n BRKK l3L~ ..' f'SE. J.IlJNTlNtj7"OJl '~r';(:':s, 2; G~ SQJJARE FT- ........... .;/~ .~~~):: BRIG< .BLD<j. PL07 PLAN 0"- ,/ . ~;..- , . $2e SQUARE ,coT. LOT " aLOCK 74 ~-~.'" NO /~06:SE47.f'W;7 .~ .:s4Nr..4<4HffA7R4CT ~ ".:l ~ ~E. ~ilN7)Nt;7OI'I ,""r? /5 -.... , ...., " FRe~J:)aY ;.. &:J' ~~741"'4e:ss :j7'e/?L ~ EM:;I/Je.GR"M!i co, ~ , E. CO/.OR;,cc ~va :5(./ITii" ,,,. ~ ,~;:' CO(/NTER dE --::~-~::; 5/107 ;...., :~. ;'1 '<''''' I')z..t? 54t.? ~!t~:~ ,.' .. \ ,~::""""""",+(~:,;, IT~i:::~1t~~~J[;5~im'J~t:-:':;t1ii~<~1~~~tf~~~i'?7'"'' R" . ARC . AlUNT/Ny'O/V DR/Vof="