Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout0777 , . . ", . RESOLUTION NO. 777 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA RECOMMENDING A DENIAL OF A ZONE CHANGE FROM R-l TO c-o AT 503 AND 509 WEST DUARTE ROAD AND 1111 AND 1117 LA CADENA AVENUE. WHEREAS, on March 16, 1972, John H. and Beatrice L. Stone, on behalf of Margaret E. Finnegan, Winifred B, Foreman and Ruth Daley, filed an application requesting that property hereafter described be rezoned from R-l to C-O, Planning Department Case < . No. Z-72-3; and WHEREAS, a pUblic hearing was held before the Planning Commission on April 11, 1972, at which time all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence; NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA HEREBY DETERMINES AND RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The subject property is zoned R-l and con- tains five single-family dwell:lmgs on four lots. Two lots front on DlIarte Road and two lots front on La Cadena Avenue. Contiguous property on all sides is zoned for residential uses. The General Plan indicate,S high density residential for the subject property. . Said property is described as follows: Those portions of Lots 47 and 48 of Tract No. 3430 as shown on map recorded in Book 42, page 32 of ,Maps, in the office of the recorder of Los Angeles County described as follows: Beginning at the intersection of the west line of La Cadena Avenue 55 feet wide with the north- erly ,line of Duarte Road 60 feet wide; thence north along said west line 254.70 feet; thence westerly parallel with the northerly line of said Lots 47 and 48 167.05 feet; thence south parallel with said west line to the northerly line of said DlIarte Road; thence easterly along last mentioned line 168.77 feet, more or less to the -1- 777 \ . . , . . point of beginning. Excepting therefrom any portion .of said lots deeded for street plIrposes. SECTION 2. This Commission finds that the prop.osed zone change is not jlIstified by either public necessity, convenience, general welfare or good z.oning pra'c tice and, therefore, rec.ommends to the City Council that said property not be rezoned. SECTION 3. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this resolution and shall cause a copy to be forwarded to the City C.ouncil of the City of Arcadia. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was adopted at a regular meeting .of the Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia held on the 25 day of April , 1972, by the following . vote: AYES: Commissioners Huddy, Kuyper, Lauber, Livingston, Perlis, Reiter, Erickson NOES: None ABSENT: None ~a~ Chairman ATTEST: ~)//h#4H~~ cretary . -2- 777 . -- '. . . . . , NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE ARCADIA CITY PLANNING COMMISSION i,CCE1VLD MAR :.l1 j'J,) CITV Of ARCAOIA CJTY ATTORNEY Z-72:-3 TO PROPERTY OWNERS W,ITHIN A 300-FOOT RADIUS WHEREAS" JOHN H. & BEATRICE L. STONE, ET AL, owners of real pro- perty located within the City of Arcadia, California, and hereinafter described, has filed with the Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia, an application requesting a zone change from Zone ll.-l to Zone c-o on the following described property. Those portions of Lots 47 and 48 of Tract No. 3430 as shown on map recorded in Book 42, Page 32 of Maps, in the office of the recorder of Los Angeles County described as,follows: Beginning at t~e intersection of the west line of La Cadena Avenue 55 feet wide with the northerly line of Duarte Road 60 feet wide; thence north along said west line 254.70 feet; thence westerly parallel with the northerly line of said Lots 47 and 48 167.05 feet; thence south parallel ,with said west line to the' northerly line of said Duarte Road; thence easterly along last mentioned line 168.77 feet, more or less to the point of beginning. Excepting therefrom any portion of said lots deeded for street purposes. The property is commonly known as,503, 509 West Duarte Road and 1111, 1117 La Cadena Avenue. NOW, THEREFORE, NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that on Tuesday, April 11,1972, at the hour of 7:30 o'clock p,m., i~ the Council Chamber of the City Hall, 240 West Huntington Drive, Arcadia, California, said Planning Commission will hold a public hearing on the proposed zone ,change, and a'n opportunity will be afforded to persOns particularly interested, and the public generally, to be heard on all matters concerning said zone change. DATED: March 31, 1972 PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA tu~W~ WILLIAM WOOLARD SECRETARY TO THE ARCADIA CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ~,/\ " . . . ,- . . A p r i 1 11, 19.7 2 TO: FROM: PLANNING COMMISSION PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: ZONE CHANGEZ-72-3 NORTHWEST CORNER OF DUARTE ROAD AND LA CADENA AVENUE 503,509 DUARTt'~OAD AND 1111, 1117 LA CADENA AVENUE APPLICATION This application, fil~d on,March 16, 1972, by John H. and Beatrice L. ~tone, and on behalf of Margaret E. Finnegan, Winifred B, Foreman and Ruth E. Da1ey-, is a request to change the existing R-1 Zone to C-O Zone, on four lots located at, the northwest corner of Duarte Road and La Ca,dena AvelJue. PRESENT LAND USE AND ZONING The subject property, is zoned R-1 and contains five sing'le family dwellings on four lots. Two lots front on Duarte Road and two lots front, on La Cadena Avenue. Property to the north consists of a vacant lot which has already re~ ceived Modification Committee approval for ~ planned apartment building; property across Arcadia Avenue is developed with single,family dwellings, condomini~ms and apartments, all in zone R-3; prop.rty to the south across Duarte Road is developed with a church, apartments~ single family dwellings, professional office building and zoned R-l, R-2a,nd C-O &, D; property t,o the east across La Cadena Avenue is deve10pe~ with single famjly dwellings andap.rtments and zoned R-1 and R-3; pro- perty to the west is d.ve1oped with apartments, mortuary and professional offic~ building and zoned R-l,.R-3 and C-O D&H. (See attached Land Us,e and Zoni,ng Map.) PROPOSAL AND ANALYSIS The applicants are seeking a zone change to encourage the construction ofbUsi ness and/or professional office sfruct~re~. The c-o zone requires that every lot shall con- tain a minimum of 10,000 square f.et. The subject site con- tains 53,211 square feet of which only the two lots fronting on Duarte Road meet or exceed the lot area requirements. .. . . Z-72-3 2 The two lots fronti ng on La Cadena AV,enue wo,ul d be non- conforming as t~ey would not meet the C-O z~ne lot area re- quirements; , The subject site was previously covered by Resolution 3356 which pe~mitted R-3 uses on property along both sides of Du.rte Road between Holly Avenue a~d Lovel] Avenue, Resolution 3356 wa$ grahted for a ten-year period of time and expired in March. 1971. Approval of zone chang.s Z-69-3 and Z-71-8 granted a change of zone from R-) to R-3 for property located at.603 West Duarte Road, 515 West Duarte Road and 1103 La Cadena Avenue. ' . The 'most desirable development of this property would be if these four lots were assembled into one parc~l and developed as a high density residential development. This area il indicated in the General Plan as being high denlity residential. The,C-O zone will permit structures to be three (J) stories or 35 feet in height, whereas ,the R-3 zone permits structures not to exceed two (2) stores or 35 feet in height. There is a special setback of 80 feet from center line of Duarte Road and 60 feet from center line'of La Cadena Avenue that is applicable to the subject site. RECOMMENDATION . The Planning Department recommends denial of this appli- cation for the following ~easons: 1. The proposed use of the properties would ~ot be compatfble with the recently adopted ,General Plan which designates this,area to be developed as high de~sity ~esidential. 2. There is adequate existing C-O zoned property in the City which has not yet been fully developed. 3. The subject property is not contiguous to any com- mercial zoning only to R-3 zoning. 4.' Commercial zoning of these four lot~ would not insure or guarantee the development of all the incl,uded parcels. " . . . Z-72-3 3 Howevet, should the Planning Commission wish to approve this applic,tion, the Planning Department reco~mends that the following ctinditions be made condttions of approva'l: I. That~any proposed use on the properties .shall comply with the'requirements tif Section 9261, whi ch among, oth!!r res~ri ctions i nelude ,"ev~ry building hereafter erected ,constructec! or, esta- blished shall be located on,a sit~ containing an area of not-less than ten thousand (10,000) square feet.," 2; ApplIcants shall cbmply with,all conditions in the attached report, as submitted by th~ Department of Public Works and shall be complied with to the satisfaction of. the Director of . Public Works. . PLA~NING DEP,ARTMENT ,~~=- RON CONTRERAS ASSOCIATE ~LANNER db Attachments . . . . . . April 4, 1972 TO: Planning Department FROM: Public Works Department SUBJECT: Zone Change 72-3 Recommend the following be made condition of approval of the proposed zone change: Dedicate 6 feet for Duarte Road, plus a 15 foot 'radius corner cut-off. ~/I~ CHESTER N. HOWARD Director of Public Works CNH/CC/fn . FAiRview AVE. . . .. ApTs. COPDDH;IIIIIl1f'1 . . . . R-3 N\'C'lDI"t .qVE. 7'l-3 VAc. R- 3 IIpT'S. "''''D6I. CoNsr,<fHcnDN .4 prs. . J . III ApT"s. April. ;) cr .. 4.- z: III Q C[ tJ ., . . - 3 It ..J ApTS. . . . 7<- / I/prs . . . "DUAR-rE 'RD. ApT'S. l . APTS, f!N",Ife-II APT'S, IFF. sLu. e_D ~-I 7f'-c:, 7?-/ fb ZONiNG 1/ LAND IJs~ MAp 5o~,So<J W.DUBen: R..l ~ 1111,/117 .LA CAI)EN4 A LIE , z- 72-3 .. b \d 1Il .. "D or . ~';.. . 4-S-7Z Rc . . . . . ZONE CHANGE APPLICATION TO THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION: FILE NO. 2-72- '3 1. APPLI CANT NAME John H, & RA~t~1nA ~_ StnnA ADDRESS 503 West D11",.te Rd. TELEPHONE NUMBER 447-3679 INTEREST IN PROPERTY Owners l. PROPERTY OWNER NAME John H. & Beatrioe L. stone ADDRESS 503 West Duarte Rd. TELEPHONE NUMBER 447-3679 DATE PROPERTY WAS ACQUIRED November lst. 1941 3. PROPERTY ADDRESS 5Q3 West Duarte Rd. 4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION Traot 3430 M. B. 42 Page 32 Portion ot Lot 48 5. DEED RESTRICTIONS NONE 6. REQUEST Multiple zone change on the above property also subsequent ohange on additional properties listed on separate page from R-I Zone to C-O Zone -1,. " . . . . . J. ANSWER THE FOllOWING QUESTIONS: . A. Does public necessity require the proposed change: Is there a real need in the community for more of the types of uses permitted by the zone requested than can be accommodated in the areas already zoned for such uses? (Fully explain your answers. considering the surrounding property as well as the property proposed to be reclassified.) There appears to be an over growth of apartments' in this partioular area,also community demand does necessitate additional 0-0 land development as there is no more 0-0 land available in the West Aroadia naazt. Rd. professionaloommunit~u1table for limited struotures B. Is the ~roperty involved in the proposed reclassification more suitable for the purposes permitted in the proposed zone than for the purposes permitted in the present classification? (Answer completely; give all reasons for your answer) . Yes; these properties involved are somewhat limited in size, therefore apartments or highly taxable dwellings are burdensome. With a C-O zoning whioh,would permit smaller structurel!!i"ould enhanoe the beauty of the area. Traftic would be restrioted as offioes would be BBBJP used only during the week whioh would relieve oonditions for the Apartment dw~llers as well as Church goers.etc, A 0-0 zOning wouid definitely oontribute to greater land use value. -2- . . . C. Would the uses permitted by the proposed zone be detrimental in any way to the surrounding property? [Explain reasons supporting your answer.) Definitely not , The area is now surrounded by large apartment complexes also a ohuroh and some business as a matter o~aot)smaller structures as limited offioes would anhance the beauty' of the area. Every property owner I, solioi ted for an endorsement, gave me a IOO~ hearty approvai of the 0-0 request. They liked the idea of smaller struotures instead of Apartments. . D. What were the original deed restrictions, if any, concerning the type and class of uses permitted on the property involved? Give the expiration date of these restrictions. (You may attach a copy of these restrfctions, after propertly underscoring the portions that are in answer to this question). The properties ,involved are rather old and after cheoking the Deed and old reoords We have been unable to locate any original deed restrictions. . -3- . . ~ 8. APPLICANT'S VERIFICATION Executed in the City of ARCADIA . County of this LOS ANGELES I~ day of . State of California. MARCH . 1 !17L. I HEREBY CERTIFY (or declare) under foregoing informationis--tr, and co~r t.; / j,1 .' " ,~-'j t' 2l ature of Appl cant Address: 503 West Duarte Rd. perjury that the Telephone No. 447 Received by W'uJ~ Receipt Number ~'~~ Date ~/7~ , ~ -4- . . ~ Joint petitions requesting zone,ohange from R-I to C-O The inolosed letters of request are duly signed by the legal property owners. Assessment MARGARET E. FINNE9:AN #2679 509 West Duarte Rd. Aroadia, Calif. 91006 Phone 447-7893 Legal desoription, Traot '3430 M. B. 42 P~e. 32 part of lot 48 tt Assessment, Winifred B. FOREMA.N #2 678 1117 La. Cadena ave. Aroadia, Calif. 91606 Phone 447-417-1 Legal desoription Traot 3~30 M. B. 42 Pg. 32 pa rt of lot 48 Assessment #2676 RUDE. DALEY 739 West Lemon Aroadia, Calif. 91006 Phone 447-4202 Legal desoription Property looated at I1II La. Cadena Ave. '~raot 3430 .... .tI. 42 l'g 32, jJart of lot 47 a.uU. part 0.1: lot 48 , . . . October 1'. 1971 Oity of Arcadia Planning Oommission City Hall Arcadia. Oalifornia 91006 Dear Madlim.s lU1d Sirs: I wish to petition the Arcadia Planning Oommission for a O-O-Zoning involving mT property at 1117 La Oadena Street. . fhis request is in conjunction with Mr. Stones request for the same zoning of his property at 503 West Duarte ad. Since the two properties are joining lU1d mT front footage is not adequate for other types of develop- ment, aDd a greater llU1d use value is evident. I feel it to be proper lU1d fitting to request the C-O-Zon1ng for .he b......... o. all c....r..d~ ~~ S1gneQ, L "eJ..8, 'f?N4P-t Address ///7 ~ .A3a~d"./0-a, <M-'''''.. &1 . . . . October 1, 1971 01ty of.1rcadia Planning Qommission city Hall .Arcadia, Oalifornia 91006 Dear Madams and Sirs a I wish to petition the Arcadia Planning ~omm18sion tor a O-O-Zoning involving my property at 509 West Duarte Ra. . This request 18 in conjunction with Hr. Stones request for the same zoning ot his property at 50} Vest Duarte Rd. Since the two properties are joining and IIl1' front footage is not adequate for other types of develop- ment, and a greater land use value is evident, I feel it to be proper and fitting to request the O-a-Zoning for the betterment ot all oonoerned. , . ~' S1"045~ 1v~~ A NLI ~a-,,- Address (/. "}( u , Ui.cll.:a..- . . . . Ootober 1, 1911 . Oit, ot Aroa41a llAMMtng Oommission OU, Hall Aroa41a, Oalltorn1a 511006 Dial' Hadama and S1re a I vlah "0 pet1tion the Aroadia llAMMhlg Oollllll1e81on ~or a O-o-ZOn1ng involving lIlT PZ"Opert7 a't ..lH\fl La Oadena Sv.e". ' {II ( ~ !hh requell" 18 in oon3uncUon w1 th Mr. StoneD l'equell't tor the, same lI01Ung ot hh:Pl'O, pel't,n.&"'~' Weet llIlal'te B.d. Sinoe the two properUell &l'e ~ and lIlT tront tootas. 1s not adequte to~oth8l' tnes ot develop. .en'. and a g..tel' land 1111 vallll 11 ev1dent, I teel it to be proper and t1 ttins to request the 0, o-ZOn1ng tor the be'tt.rmentot a1l oonoerned ~ . o . . July 2, 1971 City of Arcadia Planning Commission City Hall Arcadia, California . Dear,.Madams and Sirs; As a property owner within the 300 foot property radius of Mr. John H. Stoile's, land of 503 West Duarte ,Road, Arcadia, may I respectfully state to your commission that I have read a copy of Mr. Stones letter to you, dated July 2, 1971, and feel that' he does have a .'<ound and reasonable proposal in pursuing C-O professional use of his land. Taking all growth factors into account for our immediate neighborhood, :-Ir. Stone has truley pro- posed a plan for this land that will enhance better living throu~ less future residential dens- ity, less auto density on the streets with greater t,raffic safety, and a better balance of day and night time use of the total land in the area. It is my feeling that Mr. Stone's proposal em- braces the kind of planning that has created'the excellent livtng conditions of Arcadia in the past which must be continued if we are to mature grace- fully.into the future. R~spectfull;: Yours '1 LA/ ,Slgned - ~~~ 'Zi-'--=-rs- Names ------------- Address ~g3-cJ,_D~~ ~ _ Arcadia, California . " ' o . . July 2, 1971 City of Arcadia Planning Commission Ci ty Hall Arcadia, California Dear :-Iadams and Sirs; As a property owner within the 300 foot property radius of Mr. John ~. Stone's land of 503 West Duarte Road, Arcadia, may I respectfully state to your commission that I have read a copy of Mr. Stones letter to you, dated July 2, 1971, and feel that he does have a sound and reasonable proposal in pursuing c-o professional use of his land. . Taking all growth factors into account for our immediate neighborhood, Mr. Stone has truley pro- posed a plan for this land that will enhance better livingthroug, less future residential dens- ity, less auto density on the streets with greater traffic safety, and a better balance of dav and night time use of the total land in the area. It is my feeling that Mr. Stone's proposal em- braces the kind of nlanning that has created the excellent living conditions of Arcadia in the past which must be continued,if we are to mature grace- fully into the future. Respectfullt) Yours. I Signe~ ~AJi..,- 3.?~~~~-<- I),L :::::~:~f=~~~.~ tG Ar,,"a.. CaWom', n\~ ~'i\ q Ci (') ~ 0 ' . . . . July 2, 1971 City of Arcadia Planning Commission City Hall. Arcadia, California' Dea,r M,adam~ and Si rs; . As a property owner within the 300 foot property radius of Mr. John H. Stone's land of 503 West Duarte' Road, Arcadia, may I ,respect fully state to your commission that I have read a copy of Mr. Stones letter to you. dated Jut y 2, 197I ,and feel that he does have a sound and reasonable proposal in pursuing C-O professional use, of his land. Taking all growth factors into account for our immediate neighborhood, :-Ir. Stone has truley pro- posed' a plan for this land that will enhance better living throug, less future residenti al dens- ity, less auto density on the streets with greater traffic safety,and a better balance of day and night time use of the total land in the area~ It is my feeling that Mr. Stone's proposal em- braces the kind of planning that has created the excellent living conditions of Arcadia in the past which must be continued if weare to mature grace- fully into the future. Respectfu?lY~ours Sign.d 4:~<E/Jf!;j~. . Names e~ ~s.~c-"(4Y.:.&'..-~<;:~c. :fJ-/'~ Address :f- ~2Z.&_ ~<<J' 4- LIlI' Arcadia, California . o . . July 2, 1971 City of Arcadia Planning Commission City Hall Arcadia, California Dear Madam~ and Sirs; As a property owner within the 300 foot property radius of Mr. John H. Stone's rand of 503 West Duarte Road, 'Arcadia, may I respectfully state to your commission that I have read a copy ,of Mr. Stones letter to You, dated July 2, 1971, and feel that he does have a sound and reasonable proposal in pursuing c-o professional use of his land. . Taking all growth factors into account for our immediate neighborhood, Mr. Stone has truley pro- posed a plan, for this land that will enhance better liv,lng throug, less future residential d~ns- ity, less auto density on the streets with gr~ater traffic safety, and a better balance of day and night time use of the total land in the area. It is my feeling that Mr. Stone's proposal em- braces the kind of planning that has created the excellent living conditions of Arcadia in the past which must be continued if we are to mature grace- fully into the future. Respectfully Yours 'J1IJ ~ 1 .I' Signed -' ~ '~'~~f.j~B~:if.4if'_ Names !!9..'f:.!!".l: __ /t.!y_ ~!.:' Q>l':z:.~ _ Address -~~~ - ~1- - - - - - - Arcadia, California . I, .. . . July 2, 1971 City of Arcadia Planning Commission City Hall Arcadia" California Dear Madams Sft~ f1--; . As a property owner within the 300 foot property radius of .Mr. John H. Stone's land of 503 West Duarte Road, Arcadia, may I respectfully state to your commission that I have read a copy of Mr. Stones letter to you, dated July 2, 1971, and feel that he does have a sound and reasonable proposal in pursuing c-o professional use of his land. Taking all growth factors into account for our immedlat'e neighborhood, Mr. Stone hastruley pro- posed a plan for this land that will enhance better 11 ving throug, less fut.ure residenti 801 dens- ity, less auto density on the streets with greater traffic safety, and a better balance of day and night time use ot the total land in the area. It is my feeling that Mr. Stone's proposal em-. braces the kind of planning that has created the excellent living conditions of Arcadia in the !last which must be continued ,if we are to mature grace. fully into the future. Respectfullv Yours . ,r!'i~ ..Bqf~!:J:;iULy51;,,-, . ~ _ 1. <i...3~~ _0:.J t::.r';;4_ (( >---<- A.l.tT' ~s --------- Arcadia, California 7/t d (, . I, . . . ,July 2, 1971 City of Arcadia Planning Commission Ci ty Hall Arcadia, California Dear Madams and Sirs; . As a property owner within the 300 foot property radius of Mr. John H. stone's land of 503 West Duarte Road, Arcadia, may I respectfully state to your commission that I have read a copy of Mr. Stones letter to you, dated July 2, 1971, and feel that he does have a sound and reasonable proposal in pursuing C-O professional use of his land. Taking all growth factors into account for our immediate ne~ghborhood, Mr. Stone has truley pro~ posed a plan fO,r thi s land that wi II enhance better living throug, less future residential dens- ity, less auto density on the streets with greater traffic safety, and a better balance of day and night time use of tl:le tot'a!. land in the area. It is my feeling that Mr. Stone's. proposal em- braces the kind of planning that has created the excellent living conditions of Arcadia in the past which must be continued if we are to mature grace- fully into the future. Respect ~~.: 1,V; Yours / .. c~ - Signed ...~...4.A.4Af :::G k-<Y:::"~::F. Names CAMit.'iIDGE MANAGEMENT cd. -------------- Address 10~0_ D.::. M~r_ A2"e_ o~e.~g.:._ 9!6~5_ Arcadia, California . \ , .. . . July 2, 1971 City of Arcadia Planning Commission City Hall Arcadia, California Dear Madams and Sirs; . As a property owner within the 300 foot property radius of Mr. John H. Stone's, land of 503 W.est Duarte Road, Arcadia, may I respectfuliy state to your commission that I have read a copy of Mr. Stones letter to you, dated July 2, 1971, and feel that he does have a sou~d and reasonable proposal in pursuing c-o professional use of his land. Taking all growth factors into account for our immediate neighborhoorl, Mr. Stone has truley pro- . posed a plan for this land that wi 11 enhance better living throug, less future residential dens- ity, less auto density on the streets with gr~ater traffic SAfety, and a better balance of day and night time use of the total land in the area. I t is my feeling that Mr. Stone's proposal em- braces the kind of planning that has created the excellent living conditions of Arcadia in the past which must be continued if we are to mature grace. fully into the future. Respectfullv Yours " ~ Signed ~ ~~~.-Q/~ Names ----------------- Address .!:;:-/9..~~~~:~-A<.~ Arcadia, California . I, . . . July 2, 1971 City of Arcadia Planning Commission City Hall Arcadia, California . Dear Madam~ and Sirs; As a property owner within the 300 foot property radius of Mr. John H. Stone's. land of 503 West Duarte Road, Arcadia, may I respectfully state to your co~ission that I have read a copy of Mr. Stones letter to you, dated July 2, 197.1, and feel that he does have a sound and reasonable proposal in pursuing C-O professional use of his land. Taking all growth factors into account for our immediate neighborhood, Mr. Stone has truley pro- 'posed a plan for this land that will enhance better living throu~less future residential dens- ity, less auto density on the streets with greater traffic safety, and a better balance of day and night time use of the total land in the area. It is my feeling that Mr. Stone's proposal em- braces the kind of planning that has created the excellent living conditions of Arcadia in the past which must be continued if we are to mature grace- fully into the future. Respectfullv Yours .~ ~ Signed ~ ~~~~~~ Names ----------------- h"18~. . ~ . Address .;;::.:. _ _-zp~_~ ~::--~-:.. -'<~ Arcadia, California . , I , o . . Ju 1 y 2, 1971 City of Arcadia Planning Commission City Hall Arcadia, California Dea~ Madams and Sirs; . As a property owner within the 300 foot p~operty radius of Mr. John f. Stone's land of 503 West Dua~te Road, A~cadiA, may I respectfully state to your commission that. I have read a copy of Mr.: Stones letter to YOll, dated July 2, 1971, and feel that he does have a ~ound and reasonable proposal in pursuing C~O professional use of his land. Taking all growth factors into account for our immediate neighborhoorl, ~r. Stone has truley pro- posed a'plan for this land that will enhance better living throu~less future residential dens- ity, less auto density on the streets with greater traffic safety, and a better balance of day and night time use of the totAL land in the a~ea. It is my feeling that Mr. Stone's proposal em- braces the kind of planning that has created the excellent living conditions of Arcadia in the past which must be continued if we are to mature grace- fully into the future. Respectfullv Yours Signed 0~:::<:.Jl:~~- _ C}g~r.(,'_ Names _J~L.::i~ ~.!2<L "L_ =-!"'-. &-,;. LoI Address '>;, \ oj \0..:.'" (1,.> .,',1" Ll. f'..h".I""" _-.1_____ --------- Arcadia, California p" 0 r ,'" \:~ c_J ,\ n . "'''' IC"l.l, L', ("".1..", A". .....-\a~...l". t, . (, . . . \ . . July 2, 1971 City of Arcadia Planning Commission City Hall Arcadia, California Dear Madams and Sirs; As a property owner within the 300 foot, property radius of Mr. John H. Stone's 'land of 503 West Duarte Road, Arcadia, may I respectfully state to your commission that I have read a copy of Mr. Stones letter to you, dated July 2, 1971, and feel that he does have a, sound and ,reasonable proposal in pursuing C-O professional use of his land. Taking all growth factors into account for our immediate neighborhoorl, Mr. Stone has truley pro- posed a plan for this land that will enhance better living throug, less future residential dens- ity, less auto density on the streets with greater traffic safety, and a better balance of day and night time use 'of the total land in the area. It is my feeling that Mr. Stone's proposal em- braces the kind of planning that has created the excellent living conditions of Arcadia in the past which must be continued if we are to mature grace~ fully into the future. Respectful~Y Yours , ~ Signed ~,r r>K ~ ~~,i--:" -,- - -:12- - - -~- Name~ _ _ _.~ [JW'::'j)~-~-~~ Address _ 'tY_Y! _0!~ - - ~ r. ;j " , Arcadia, California '1! 7 I LAA, A ~_f'A,.4J" '.A.,A' . ff'~. /co:;)c.l. ..u: [. J" ~. ~'!;'f L-/\... f\