HomeMy WebLinkAbout0740
,
"
/"
/
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 740
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA RECOMMENDING THE
CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY INTO
THE "D" ZONE, AND RECOMMENDING REGULATIONS
TO BE APPLICABLE UNDER ZONE "D",
THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA DOES
DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. . That pursuant to Division 3 of Part 9 of
Chapter 2 of Article. IX of the Arcadia Municipal Code, the Planning
Commission of the City of Arcadia on June 8, 1971, held a ,public
.
hearing for the purpose of considering and making recommendations
concerning the classification to Zone "D" of that portion of the
City of Arcadia described as foilows:
All property west of Baldwin Avenue and north
of Foothill Boulevard, excluding the County ar~a.
At said hearing all interested persons were given a full opportunity
to be heard and to present evidence, Evidence was submitted by
interested persons and the Planning Department.
SECTION 2. The Planning Commission finds and determines,
as more particularly hereinafter set forth, that public necessity,
convenience, general, welfare, health and good zoning practice 'justify
and require that this Commission recommend to the City Council the
classification of said property in the "D" Zone; and that concurrently
.
with said classification, the following architectural design zone
conditions be imposed:
1. Floor Area. No one-family dwelling shall be erected
or permitted which contains less than 2,500 square feet of ground
floor area~ provided that in determining the number of square feet
within any residence building erected or proposed for construction,
-1-
740
.
.
.
the space contained within any uncovered porch, balcony, approach,
patio, or other uncovered enclosure shall not be considered in the
computation of the square footage contained in the building; and
provided that the space contained within any covered porch, balcony,
or garage which constitutes a portion of such residence shall be
computed at'one-half of the actual square footage therein contained.
The minimum floor space shall be deemed to include the area measured
from the outer faces of the exterior walls.
2. Setbacks, No building or ,other struct,ure on the
property shall be erected less than 40 feet from the front property
line, less than 15 feet from the sidelines or less than 40 feet from
.
the rear line of any lot, provided that the front setback of any
building or other structure on any lot shall be reasonably compatible
with the front setback of existing buildings or other structures
previously erected on adjacent lots, and the Architectural Review
Board, the "Board," hereinafter established shall, have the power to
require a front setback of more than 40 feet for any lot in order
that such setback will be reasonably compatible with that of adjacent
lots. In case of undue hardship to any property owner in complying
with the foregoing sideline and rear setback requirements, the Board
. ,
shall have the power to reduce the sideline setback requirements to
not less than ten fee,t and the rear setback requirements to not less
than 25 feet, provided that in no event shall the sideline setbacks
applicable to the front 150 feet of any lot be reduced to less than
. 15 feet.
3. Garage, Any separate garage, not connected to the
residence as an integral part thereof, and located in the front
150 feet of the lot shall nO,t b,e closer to the fron,t property line
than the main structure,
-2-
740
..
.
.
.
4, Corner Lots. No building or other structure shall be
erected, maintained or permitted on a corner lot which is less than
25 feet, at any point, from the side street property line.
5. Front of Dweliing, Any dwelling placed or ,maintained
on any lot shall face the front line thereof.
6. Trees, No living native tree, larger than six inches
in diameter shall be cut down, killed or removed in any manner whatso-
ever without first securing the written permission of the Board,
regardless upon whose property the tree is actually growing, Such
permission shall not be 'granted by the Board unless it is shown that
the tree is a nuisance and that there. is no practical way of removing
the nuisance except by cutting down, killing or removing the tree.
7, Walls, Fences and Hedges, All walls, fences and hedges
shall be maintained in good condition. No wall or fence shall exceed
three feet in height in the front yard, nor six feet along that por-
tion of sidelines extending to the rear of the front building line,
or elsewhere~ on any property. No wall, fence or hedge on a corner
lot shall be maintained at a height or in such place so as to
unreasonably obstruct the view of motorists and thereby create a
traffic hazard.
8. Compatibility of Materials. Materials used on the
exterior of any structure, wall, or fence, or the materials o! any
struc,ture, wall, or fence, which remains exposed, shall be reasonably
compatible with materials of other structures on the same lot and with
. other structures in the neighborhOOd.
9, External Building Appearance. The appearance of any
structure, including a wall or fence, shall be reasonably compatible
with existing structures in the neighborhood,
-3-
740
.
.
.
.
.
10, Approval of Board Required. No structure, including a
wall or fence, shall be erected or modified unless working drawings
and specifications for erection, modification or improvement of the
structure, showing the precise location on the lot of the structure,
have been submitted to and approved by the Board. No structure shall
be erected or modified except in exact conformance with the working
drawings and specifications approved by the Board. The provisions of
this condition shall not apply if the Board does not qualify as herein-
after provided, nor if the drawings are for work inside a building
which does not sUbstantially change the external appearance of the
building.
11. Architectural Review Board, There exists in said area
a board known as the Architectural Review Board. The Board shall be
qualified, at any time, to transact business and exercise any powers
herein conferred only if the following requirements exist:
(a) A formally organized property owners association
exists in said area controlled by the owners ,of a majority
of the total number of lots in said area.
(b) The organization has by-laws adopted and subject
to amendment by the affirmative vO,te of said majority',
(c) Said by-laws provide for appointment of such
owners, only, to the Board.
(d) Owners have been appointed to the Board in
accordance with the by-laws.
(e) A copy of the by-laws, and any amendments
thereto, have been filed with the City Clerk and the
Planning Director, together with a list of the lots
and owners thereof which constitute said majority;
said organization shall comply with any reasonable
-4-
740
.
.
.
.
order of the Planning Director drawn for the sole purpose
of keeping said list current without expense to the City,
(f) Permanent written records of the meetings,
action, findings, and decisions of the Board are maintained
and are open at reasonable times to the inspection. of the
public. Each matter referred to the Board shall be assigned
an identifying number. Any denial of approval shall be
accompanied by detailed findings ,of the reasons of the
Board for its disapproval.
(g) Notice of any action taken by the Board in
denying or approving working drawings and specifications
shall be filed within 24 hours of such action with the
Planning Department and posted on the bu~letin board
outside the City Council Chambers in the Arcadia City
Hall.
12, Powers of the Board. The Board shall have the power to:
(a) Determine and approve an appropriate front yard
pursuant to Condition 2, above.
(b) Determine whether materials and appearance are
compatible in accordance with the above conditions and
based upon such determination deny or approve the working
drawings and specification.
(c) If a grading plan is required for a building
permit for a structure, the Board may require such plan
to be submitted with the working drawings and specifica-
tions.
(d) Any of the conditions set forth in Sections 1
to 9, above, may be made less restrictive by the Board
if the Board determines that such action will foster the
.
-5-
740
.'
.
.
.
..
.
.
development of a lot and will not adversely affect the
amenities of the adjacent lots and the general neighbor-
hood; provided, (1) the owner or owners of abutting
lots" and (2) in the case of decisions affecting front
yards and corner side yards, owners of property within
65 feet of such yards, shall be notified by the Board
in writing 72 hours before the hearing where the Board
acts, under this subdivision.
13. Appeal, Any property owner in said ftrea may appeal the
decision of the Architectural Review Board by following the proce-
dures for a Modification as prescribed by the Arcadia Municipal Code,
provided a letter of appeal is filed with the Planning Department
within ten days after the decision of the Architectural Review Board
is posted in accordance with Condition ,11 (g), above. Any officer
of the City, member of the City Councilor Planning Commission may
institute such an appeal by filing a request with the Modification
Committee. The provisions of this condition shall not apply to
working drawings and specifications for work inside a building which
does not substantially change the external appearance of the buildfng.
14, Standards for Board Decision and Appeals, The Board
and any body hearing an appeal from the Board's decision shall be
guided by the following principles:
(a) . Control of ar.chitectural appearance and use of
materials shall not be so exercised that individual
initiative is stifled in creating the appearance of
external features of any particular structure, building,
or fence, except to the extent necessary to establish
contemporarily accepted standards of harmony ahd
compati bili ty .
-6-
740
..
.
.
.
.
.
(b) Go,od archi,te,ctural character is based upon the
principles of harmony and proportion in the elemen,ts of
the structure as well as the relationship of such princi-
ples to adjacent structures and other structures in the
neighborhood,
(c) A good relationship between adjacent front
yards increases the value of properties and makes the
use of both properties more enjoyable,
(d) A pooriy designed external appearance of a
structure can be detrimental to the amenities and value
of adjacent property and neighborhood,
15. Time for Board to Act. The Board shall hear any request
for a review of working drawings and specifications within thirty days
from the date such request is filed with the Board and shall render
a decision in writing in accordance with this resolution within ten
days of such hearing; failure to take action in said time shall, at
the end of said ten-day period, be deemed a disapproval of the working
drawings and specifications. Any property owner in said area may
appeal the action of the Board, by following the procedure set forth
in Condition 13, above,
16. Annual Report. The Board annually shall make a general
report of its activities of the preceding year to the Planning Commis-
sion,
SECTION 3, The Planning Commission finds and determines:
1, The area referred to herein is presently substantially
developed with single-family residences on lots predominantly con-
taining more than 25,000 square feet; that substantially all of said
residences were constructed appr.oximately in the same period of time
and have been maintained in a fi.rst-class condition since that time.
-7-
740
, '
.
.
.'
.
2, That the residences in said area were constructed in an
orderly, harmonious manner; and, at the present time, the appearance
ofsub,stantially all residences, including walls, fences and land-
scaping, in said area is harmonious and compatible in all respects
with substantially all other residences in the area.
3, That the conditions found to exist in findings Number 1
and 2, above, have substantially contributed to making this area
adequate for family purposes,
4, That the purpose of the provisions of this resolution
ar.e to secure and maintain the conditions found to exist in findings
Number 1 and 2, above; that said provisions will maintain said condi-
.
tions.
5. That the continued maintenance of said conditions will
benefit said area and the City of Arcadia~ generally, by maintaining
the economic viability of said area.
6, That the health, safety and general welfare of the
people of Arcadia and good zoning practice require the adoption of
this resolution.
SECTION 4, The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of
this resolution and shall cause a copy hereof to be forwarded to the
City Council of the City of Arcadia.
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing resolution was adopted
at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on the 22nd day
of
June
, 1971, by the following vote:
.
AYES:
NOES:
Commissioners Cahill, Huddy, Kuyper,
Lauber, Reiter, Livingston
None
Erickson 1,//.<1
/s/ ~ ~ y
l\H'S'-:rA';['N::
ABSENT:
Commissioner
None
ATTEST:
/s/ tJ~
ecretary
Chairman
-8-
740
, ..
.
.
.
.
.
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BEFORE TH E
ARCADIA CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
2-71-3
WHEREAS, The Planning Commission, at the request of the Rancho Santa
Anita Property Owners Association, will hold a public hearing on a zone change
from Zone R-O to Zone R-O & D on the following described "roperty:
All property west of Baldwin Avenue and north
of Foothill Boulevard, excluding the County area.
The property is commonly knawn as the Upper Rancho.
N~w, therefore, notice is hereby given that on Tuesday, 25/1ay)27 1 , at
the hour of 7:30 o'clock p.m. in the Council Chambers of the City Hall, 240 West
Huntington Drive, Arcadia, California, said Planning Commission will hold a
public hearing on the'proposed zone change, and an opportunity will be afforded to
persons particularly interested, and the public generally, to !e heord on all matters
concerning said zone change.
Dated: 14 May 1971
pLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA
C1ue.. Y1(~....~
CARL MOOERS, Secretary of the
Arcadia Planning Commission
~)-
~
~iY IV" -:;x'0
, .
..
.
.
8 June 1971
TO: PLANNING COMMISSION
FROM: PLANNING DEPARTMENT
SUBJECT: "0" OVERLAY - UPPER RANCHO
Gentlemen:
.
Attached please find the resolutions covering the requested
"0" overlay for the Upper Rancho area, These resolutions have
been reviewed by the concerned property owners association and
are submitted to the City at'their request.
Respectfully submitted,
{' C2U- 7t7~k
CARL MOOERS, ~
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
CM:sm
Attachment
.
/.l
~~o
" ,
, .
,
!
, .
I
\) I
"',' ..
.,'
.
.
City of Sierrq Madre
.
i
<
PROPOSED IRIGHt-O',.;''I'1
)1 r::::=---n,' (.OI.OIl,ll,DO
r .,,1 II
.._'", '1 . '
AREA ZONING MAP
Z-71-3 '
d
.sANtA /\,..".. SUr.TIO~ I
FOOTHILL
fREEWAY
II
II
Sf:
~~GENO:
D MNMlJM LOT AREA"".," ~O"SQ.n,:
m M1HIMlM lOT AIIUl..,~." !OOOo sO.n,
~. ' :
.,.'.
c=--
,
)
/._.;.-----
II
.
o 500 1000
I, , . , , I ......=--=1
Wl.l- un
. ..
\" "
..'
!
...,.
. .
;
.
RESOLUTI ON NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING
COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA,
RECOMMENDING THE CLASSIFICATION OF
CERTAIN PROPERTY INTO THE D ZONE,-
AND RECOMMENDING REGULATIONS TO BE
APPLICABLE UNDER ZONE D,
THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA,
DOES DETERMINE AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That pursuant to Division 3 df Part 9 of
Chapter 2 of Ar~icle IX of the Arcadia.Municip.l Code, the City
. held a public hearing' for the purpose of considering and making
Planning Commission of the City of Arcadia on ( .
, ,
) ,
.'
recommendatldns cbncerning the classification to Zone 0 of that
p~rtion of the City of Arcadia described as follows:
All property west of Baidwin Avenue and north
of Foothill Boulevard, excluding' the County
area.
At said hearing all interested persons were given a full
opportunity to be heard a~d to present evidence. Evidence was
submitted by intere1ted persbns and the Commission Staff..
SECTION 2. The Plannin~ Commission finds and determines,
.
as more particularly hereinafter set forth, tbat public necessity,
convenience, general welfare, health and good zoning p~actlce jus-
tify and require that this Commission rec'omniend to the City Counci.1
the classHicatlon of said property in the 0 Zone, and that con-
currently \./ith said classification the following architectural
'des i gn zone cond I t Ions be .tmpos ed:
1. FLOOR AREA. No one-family dwelling shall be erected
or permitted ~Ihich contains less than 2500 square feet of ground
floor area, provided that In determining the number of,square feet
within any residence bulldjng erected or proposed for construction
,
the space contained within any uncovered porch, '~alcony, approach,
f
....., ',"
. .J..' IV I
\ ,\. no {, '... ~
-< " ," .'
'\. ." ','-.
- -
.~._____...__~ .. .' ,.--0:-.- ----
"
\ ."
,! .
. ,
'.
"
.
patio, or other uncovered encl.;:sure',shall 'no't be ::onsidered in the
~omputati"o,n of the square footage contained in the building;
further, the ~pace contained within any. covered porch, balcony,
"'0 .
'~7
it
, ,
or gar,ge which constitutis a portion of such residence shall be
'.com~uted at one-half,of the actual squa~e footage'therein con-
tained, The minimum floor space shall be deemed to include the
area measured from the outer fac.es o'f the' ~xterior ~ialls.
2, SETBACKS. No:bui~ding or other ~tructure.on 'the
property shall be erected, maintained, or permitted less than
40 feet from the street, nor less- than IS.feet from the side-
lines of the front 150 feet of the lot. 'If ,a dwelling with a
larger yard ~han the min'imum require'd by th~' R-O regu'lations
exists on a lot on eith~r side of a lot proposed to be improved,
..'<..
the Architectural Review Boar,d, hereinafter establ,ished, and
hereafter referred to as the "Board," sha~l have the power to
require an a.ur.~~e front yard on the lot to be improved,
includin~ one up to a size. as, large as an adjacent front yard.
3. GARAGE. Any s~parate garage, not connected to
. the residence as an integral part thereof, must be located not
near.er than 150 feet to that portion of said premises fronting
on the street whereon the'residence is located.
4, GARAGE, CORNER.
.
On a corner lot, a separate
garage, which is not an integral part of the dw~l1ing thereon,
shall not be placed:or maintained lesi than 25 feet, at any
.
point, from the side street property line.
..
5. FRONT OF DWELLING. Any dwelling placed or main-
tained on any lot shall face the front line thereof.
6, 'TREES. N~ nitive tree larger than 6 inches in dia-.
meter shall be cut down, killed, or removed in any manner whatso-
...
. '
" ,
. .. ..
.,
,
~
.
.
'ever without first securing the written perm~ssio~ of the Board,
regardles~ upon whose propepty the tre~ is actually growing.
], .WALLS. F.ENCES. HEDGES. "All walls, fences, and
hedges shall be maintained in good condition and shall n~t
exceed three feet in. height in the front y.ard, rio,: six feet
e1 se~lhere,
..
"
a. COMPATIBILITY OF MATERIALS. Materials used on the
, '.
exterior of any structur~, wall, or fence, br the materi~ls of
any structure, wall, or fence~ which remains e~posed, s~al1 be
compatible with .materia1s of ~ther structures on the same lot;
and with other structures in the neighborhood.
:g. EXTtRNAL B~IL~ING APP~ARANCE. The app~aranc~ ,of
_." any structure, wall,'or .fence shall be compatible with existing
structures, wa 11 s, or fences in' the ne,i ghborh-ood.
,
...: .
10. APPROVAL OF BOARD REQUIRED.' No'strutture, wall,
or fence shall be erected un1es~ working drawings and specifi~
cations for erec-tion of the structure, showing the precise 10-,
cation o~ the' lot of the s~ructure, wall, oi fence; have been
. ,
submitted to and approved' by the Board. No structure, ~Ia'll,
.
-
or fence shall be erected except in exact conformance with the
working drawi-ngs an-d specifications approved' by th~ Board.
The provisions of this condition ,shall not ap,P1y if the Board
does not qualify as hereinafter provided, nor if the drawings
are for work inside a building which does not s~bstantia11y
change the externa 1 'appearance of the bu il di ng.
Ii. ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD, There exists in
said area a board known as the Architectural 'Review Board.
The Board shall b,e qualified, at any time, to transact business
and' exercise any powe~s herein conferred only if the following
requirements exist:
(a) A formally organized property own~rs organization
exists in said area controlie'd by the owne'r's of a maj?rity
~ "
, ,
__H___'
" '
.
~. . .
.
.
--_.~~_...-.- '-
-
'-,....- ------, .-- ...-
!,e
..
of the tota) number of lots in said area.
,
(b) The organization has, by-la~ls adopted and subject
tri a~endment by the affirmative v6te of ~~id majority.
(c) Said by-laws provide for appointment of such
, n. f; I '
owners, only, to the^Boafd.
(d) Owners have been appoint~~ to the ~oard in
accorda~ce with the by-laws;
'(er A copy of the by-Jaws,'and'any amendments
thereto, have been filed with th~ City Clerk and the
. "
Planning Dlrector, together with a list of the lots and
owners thereof which constitute said majority; said
organization shall comply with any reaso,nable order of
the Planning Director drawn for' the ~01e purpose of
keeping said 1 is,t c'urrent without expense to the City.
,
.' .
. (f) Permanent written records ~f 'the meetings,
. action, findings, and decisions of tne Board are main-
tained and are open at reason,able times to the inspection
.'
to "
of the public. Each matter referre,d the Board s ha 11
be as 5i 9 n ed an ideri t i fyi ng number. Any denial of
approval shall be accompanied by deta'iled findings of
the reasons of the Board for jts disapproval,
. (g) Notice of ~ny action taken by the Bciard in
denying or approving workin~ drawings add specifications
shall be filed; within 24 hours of such action, with the
Planning Depar~ment and posted on the bulletin board out-
side the City Council Chambers in the Arcadia e1ty Hall.
12. POHERS OF THE BOARD. The Board shall have the
pO~ler to:
(a) Determine and approve an appropriate front
yard pursuant to condition 2, above.
(b)' Determine whether materials and appearance
are compatible in accordance with the a'bove'c.onditions
t I"
.'
and based upon such det~rminatiort deny or approve th~
~~--'-'--'-'
~ "'."--"-
....--
.:
;
.'. l
..
:.
.
'1
> r,
.
.
working drawings and s~acificatiohs.
.
(c) If a grading plan is 'required for a. building
permit for,~ structure, the Board may require such plan
to be subciitted wiih the working dr~wings and specifi-
cations,
'(d)' Any of the conditions'set forth in Sections
.1,to II, above, may'be made less restrictive by the
Board if. the Boa~d determine~ that s~ch action will
foster the develQpment o~ a' lot ind wiil,not adversely
.
, . ,
affett the amenities of ~he adjacent lots, and the
general neighborhood; provided (I) the owner or
owners of abutting lots and (2) in the case of de-
cisions ~ffecting ,front yards and corner si~e yards,
owners of prope~ty within sixty-five feet of the pro-
, ,
perty line of said lot shall be notified.~y. the Boa.rd '
,in writing 72 hours before the hearing where the Board
acts
~3.
~e powe;
under this subdivision.
LIMIT ON BOARD'S POH.ER., The Board shall not have
to waive ~ny regulations in theCbde pertaining to
the basic zone of the property in sarli area,
14. APPEAL, Any property owner in said area may appeal
the decision of the Architectural RevieW Board by following the
procedures fora Modification as ,prescribed by the Arcadia
Municipal Code, provided a 'letter of appeal is fil ed with the
,.
Planning Department ,within ten days after the decision of the
. Architectural Revi el'J Board is posted in accorda,nce It.i th
Condition 11, ( g ) , above. Any officer of the Ci ty, member- of the
City Councilor Planning Commission may institute such an appeal
by filing a request ~ith the Modification Com~jttee, Jhe pro-
visions of this condition shall not apply to working drawings and
specifications fdr work inside a building which does ~ot ~ubstan-
change the external appearance of the building.
,
.,'
"
,',
, "
"
.
I
"
1
.,
"
1
,
~
j
~
;
"
'1
{
I
,. "
! 1.
'J
~
,
1
:1
!. .
, .
, ~
i :
.
j
l
;
~
~
J
:1
1
"
'I
"
I
I
i
.
I
'1
.
.,.'
.,
;.
..
.
. ". .
.
. .:
"
.
15, STANDARDS FOR BOARD DECISION AND APPEALS. The Board
, ,
and any body hearing an appeal fro~,the Bo~rd's decision shall
~e. guided' by the following principles::
(a) Control of architectural appearance and
u~e of m~terials shall not be ,so ~xercised that
individual initiative is stifled i~'.creati~g'the
appearance of external fea~ures.of any particular
structur'e, bui ldi ng. or fence, except to the extent
necessary to establish cont~mporarily acc~pted
standards of harmony and compatibility.
(b) G'ood architectural 'character is based upon
the principles of harmony and proportion in t~e elements
of the struc~ure as'well as the'relati~nship of such
principles to adjac~nt structures, and other structur.s
".
, ..
.
.
in the neighborhood.
(c) A good relationship between adjacent front
yards increases the value of properties'and makes the
"':'"
use of both properties more enjoyable. :
(d) A poorly designed external appearance of a,
.'
structure can be detri~ental to the amenities and value
of adjacent property and neighborhood.
.
16. TIME FOR BOARD TO ACT. The Board shall hear any
request for a review of working drawings and specifications
within thirty days 'from the date such request i~ filed with
the Soard and shall :render a decision in writlng in accordance
with this resolution within ten ~ays of such he~rin~: failure
to take action in said time shall, at the end of said ten-day
period, be deemed a disapproval of the working drawings ,nd
specifications. Any property owner in said area may 'appeal the "
action of the Board by following the procedure set forth in
Condition 16, above.
SECTION 3. The Planning Commission fi~ds and determines:
~ .' .
1, The area referred io her~in is presently sub~t)n-
, .
-
--
4__....__..___ __... _.,. ..._
. .
, ,
- :
.
!I ..
:
.
r
.
, . ti ally de vel 0 p e d \.Ii t h sin g 1 e fa mil y res ide n c e Son lot s co nt a i n i n g
12,500 feet or mor~; that predominately all ,of said residences
were ~onstructed at approxi~ately the s~me time and have been
maintained in ',1 first class condition since that time.
2, ~hat the residences in said area were constructed
,in in orderly, harmo~ious manner:and at the'present time the
.appearance of each residence,includihg-walls, fences, 'and
.
, ,
landscaping. ,in said area is harmonious and compatible in all
1"espec:ts with all oth.er res i dentes in the area.
3. That the conditions iound 'to exis~ in findings
l1iunrber 1 and 2, above, have sUbstantially contributed to making
this area adequite for fimJ1Y purposes.
4. That the purpose of the p~ovisions pf this reso- .
lution are to secure, and maintain the conditions found to exist'
.,
.
in findings number 1 and 2, above~
~aintain said conditions.
that said provis10ns .will
5. That the continued maintenance of said conditions
'wil.l benefit safd area and the City of Arcadia~ generally, by'
maintaining the economic Viability of said area.
,
6. That the health, safety, and general welfare of the
people of Arcadia and good zoning practice require the ~doption
of this resolution.
.
SECTION 4, The Secretary shall cer.tify to the adoption
(l)tf t.his r'esolution and shall cause a copy hereof to be forW,arded
'/tro 1l;:!,'l! rcff:tll Council, of the City of Arcad; a,
1 !ll.El?.ft:lW C'ERTlFY that the foregoing r.esol\l.tion was adopted
Clt is lI"'?g::;l'~iU ;roeet'lllg of the City Planning Commission held' on the
day of
, 1971, by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
,Chairman
,.,
ATTEST:'
L
.
.
.
-::---
.
.
EOWARD L. SI.ITTE:RWORTH
CAVID G. W"l..LE~
THOMAS P, H-E:NDRICKS
JERA'I" L. SHlJF"ORD
~W"~'r
BUTTERWORTH & WALLER
PACIFIC COAST STOCK EXCHANGE
GROUND PLOOF!' SUITe: B
6'6 SOUTH SPRING STREET
L;OS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90014
TEL.EPHONE
(<l:13J,627-3141
CABLE- ADDRESS
.. BUTTERCAl"
April 12, 1971
Mr. Lyman Cozad
City Manager
Ci ty of Arcadia
240 W. Huntington Drive
Arcadia, California 91006
CITY OF ARCADfil
APR 13 1971
CITY MANAGER
Dear Lyman:
I am enclosing herewith a copy of a Resolution
which relates to setting up an architectural review
committee in the Upper Rancho. I call your attention
to Paragraph 13, This seems to be unhappy language for
by implication it suggests that the Board does have the
power to waive regulations in the Code on matters other
than the basic zone of the property. I am sure the
Council would never accept this.
Also, in Paragraph 2 on page 2, the word
"appropriate" seems to be most indefinite. Perhaps
this is the best that can be done, but I don't think
so.
Sincerely,
If
Edward L. Butterworth
ELB:tw
Ene.