HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings and Action Report 05-24-2024Rancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-1-
Date: May 24, 2024 File No.
Project Address: 875 San Simeon Road
Association Name: Rancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association
Applicant Name: Giantech Construction Inc.
Property Owner(s) Name: Jonathan Wu
Project Description:
Construction of a new 219 square foot second story addition,
above an existing first floor area. New windows are proposed on
the east and south elevations and will match new renovation
windows. Overall height of the addition will be 20’2”
FINDINGS
Only check those that are apply and provide a written explanation for each
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Site Planning Principles
and Neighborhood Context Guidelines.
Explanation:
The building footprint is within required setbacks and considers
potential privacy issues of neighbors.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Forms and Mass
Guidelines.
Explanation: The building mass is consistent with other homes on the block. .
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Frontage Conditions
Guidelines.
Explanation:
The addition is on the rear side of the house, not visible from the public
street.
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Garages and Driveways
Guidelines.
Explanation: NA
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Architectural Styles
Guidelines.
Rancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-2-
Explanation:
The addition is consistent with the architectural style of the existing
house.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Height, Bulk, and Scale
Guidelines.
Explanation: The addition blends nicely with the existing structure..
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Roofline Guidelines.
Explanation:
The roof plan including overhang, color, and material is consistent with
the existing structure.
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Entries Guidelines.
Explanation: NA
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Windows and Doors
Guidelines.
Explanation:
Windows are proposed only on the east and south elevations where
heavy vegetation along the property line blocks the view of the addition.
No windows are proposed on the north elevation to provide privacy to
the property nearest to the addition.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Articulation Guidelines.
Explanation: The design avoids large expanses of wall plane.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Facade Details Guidelines.
Explanation: Façade details consistently applied.
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Colors and Materials
Guidelines.
Explanation: Colors and materials match the existing house.
Rancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-3-
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Accessory Lighting
Guidelines.
Explanation: NA
The proposed project X is, is not consistent with the Additions, Alterations,
and Accessory Buildings/Structures Guidelines.
Explanation:
The addition is consistent with the architectural style and detailing of
the existing house.
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Hillside Properties
Guidelines.
Explanation: NA
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Fences, Walls, Gates, and
Hedges Guidelines.
Explanation: NA
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Impervious Coverage and
Landscape Areas Guidelines.
Explanation: NA
ACTION
Pursuant to City’s Development Code Section 9107.20.050, a Site Plan and Design Review in the
Homeowners Association Areas may be approved only if it is found that the proposed development
is consistent with the City’s adopted Design Guidelines.
X APPROVED CONDITIONALLY APPROVED DENIED
Date of ARB Meeting: MAY 23, 2024
Rancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-4-
ARB Members Rendering the Above Decision:
AYES: Boehr, Huang, Medeiros
NOES:
ABSENT: Fricke, Pappas, and Eriksson
Conditions of Approval:
Reason for Denial:
There is a ten (10) day appeal period for this application. To file an appeal, a completed
Appeal Application form must be submitted to the City’s Planning Division along with a
$600.00 appeal fee by 5:30 p.m. on June 3, 2024. You will be notified if an appeal is filed.
Approved designs shall expire in one year (June 4, 2025) from the effective date unless
plans are submitted to Building Services for plan-check, a building permit is issued and
the construction is diligently pursued, a certificate of occupancy has been issued, or the
approval is renewed. The final plans must be consistent with the approved design concept
plans and any conditions of approval. Any inconsistency from the approved design
concept plans may preclude the issuance of a building permit.
An extension may be granted by the ARB or designee, or the Review Authority that
approved the project for a maximum period of one (1) year from the initial expiration date.
An extension can only be granted if the required findings can be made. Please note that
acceptance of an extension request does not indicate approval of an extension.
You may visit the City’s website at www.ArcadiaCA.gov/noticesanddecisions to view this
document. If you have any questions regarding the above decision, please contact Greg
Medeiros, ARB Chairperson at 626-833-0249, ranchosaarb@gmail.com. Thank you.
Rancho Santa Anita Residents’ Association
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-5-
c: City of Arcadia, Planning Division