Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutARB Findings and Action FormSanta Anita Oaks HOA ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -5- Date: November 1, 2024 File No. Project Address: 1400 Oak Lawn Rd Association Name: Santa Anita Oaks HOA Applicant Name: Robert Tong Property Owner(s) Name: Tracy Ly Project Description: New construction of one story single family residence FINDINGS Only check those that are apply and provide a written explanation for each The proposed project £ is, £ is not consistent with the Site Planning Principles and Neighborhood Context Guidelines. Explanation: The design, size and configuration of the new residence is visually harmonious and compatible with the surroundings. Building has been designed to take into consideration the privacy of neighbors. The proposed project £ is, £ is not consistent with the Forms and Mass Guidelines. Explanation: The design of this one-story residence is well within the forms and mass guidelines. The proposed project £ is, £ is not consistent with the Frontage Conditions Guidelines. Explanation: Frontage of property blends well with existing neighborhood. The proposed project £ is, £ is not consistent with the Garages and Driveways Guidelines. Explanation: Property is located on a corner lot. Entrance to garage is on Oaklawn Place while front entrance of the home is on Oaklawn Road. Location of garage does not impact the front façade of the house. The proposed project £ is, £ is not consistent with the Architectural Styles Guidelines. Explanation: This one story French Country style home is consistent with the architectural style guidelines. Santa Anita Oaks HOA ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -5- The proposed project £ is, £ is not consistent with the Height, Bulk, and Scale Guidelines. Explanation: Property well within the height, bulk and scale guidelines set by the city. The proposed project £ is, £ is not consistent with the Roofline Guidelines. Explanation: Roof plan is consistent with the architectural style and vintage wood tiles complement the structure. The proposed project £ is, £ is not consistent with the Entries Guidelines. Explanation: Stone and arch entry door design is nicely recessed and compatible with the style of the home. The proposed project £ is, £ is not consistent with the Windows and Doors Guidelines. Explanation: Building facades well-articulated with window and doors, also complementary for the chosen architectural style. The proposed project £ is, £ is not consistent with the Articulation Guidelines. Explanation: Architectural detailing and articulation of house provides beauty and consistency throughout the building structure. The proposed project £ is, £ is not consistent with the Facade Details Guidelines. Explanation: Natural stones facade and smooth stucco finish is relevant to the architectural style of the house. The proposed project £ is, £ is not consistent with the Colors and Materials Guidelines. Explanation: High quality building materials, natural stones and harmonious coloring throughout the property is compatible with the neighborhood. Santa Anita Oaks HOA ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -5- The proposed project £ is, £ is not consistent with the Accessory Lighting Guidelines. Explanation: Beautiful tube shape hook on lights will enhance the external look of the home. The proposed project £ is, £ is not consistent with the Additions, Alterations, and Accessory Buildings/Structures Guidelines. Explanation: Outside porch and loggia are the only outside structures. No ADU, pool house and other additions. The proposed project £ is, £ is not consistent with the Hillside Properties Guidelines. Explanation: Not applicable. The proposed project £ is, £ is not consistent with the Fences, Walls, Gates, and Hedges Guidelines. Explanation: Wood fence throughout is beautiful but requires constant maintenance. The proposed project £ is, £ is not consistent with the Impervious Coverage and Landscape Areas Guidelines. Explanation: Proposed landscape plan complements the beauty of the property. Large new plants placed will soften the visual impact of building mass. ACTION Pursuant to City’s Development Code Section 9107.20.050, a Site Plan and Design Review in the Homeowners Association Areas may be approved only if it is found that the proposed development is consistent with the City’s adopted Design Guidelines. £ APPROVED £ CONDITIONALLY APPROVED £ DENIED Date of ARB Meeting: OCTOBER 28, 2024 ARB Members Rendering the Above Decision: Santa Anita Oaks HOA ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -5- AYES:Tom Walker (ARB Chair) Jessica Louie (ARB) Matthew Rimmer (ARB) Loren Brodhead (ARB) John Golper (ARB) Rocco Liberio (ARB) NOES:0 ABSENT: Gabriel Rousset (ARB) ABSTAIN: Krister Lile (ARB) Conditions of Approval: NONE No conditions. Reason for Denial: There is a ten (10) day appeal period for this application. To file an appeal, a completed Appeal Application form must be submitted to the City’s Planning Division along with a $600.00 appeal fee by 4:30 p.m. on November 14, 2024 You will be notified if an appeal is filed. Approved designs shall expire in one year (_November 2, 2025_) from the effective date unless plans are submitted to Building Services for plan-check, a building permit is issued and the construction is diligently pursued, a certificate of occupancy has been issued, or the approval is renewed. The final plans must be consistent with the approved design concept plans and any conditions of approval. Any inconsistency from the approved design concept plans may preclude the issuance of a building permit. An extension may be granted by the ARB or designee, or the Review Authority that approved the project for a maximum period of one (1) year from the initial expiration date. An extension can only be granted if the required findings can be made. Please note that acceptance of an extension request does not indicate approval of an extension. Santa Anita Oaks HOA ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -5- You may visit the City’s website at www.ArcadiaCA.gov/noticesanddecisions to view this document. If you have any questions regarding the above decision, please contact the ARB Chairperson at saohoaarb@gmail.com. Thank you. c: City of Arcadia, Planning Division