HomeMy WebLinkAbout12-10-24 Agenda PacketCITY OF ARCADIA
Planning Commission
Regular Meeting Agenda
Tuesday, December 10, 2024, 7:00 p.m.
Pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons with a disability who require a disability related modification or accommodation
in order to participate in a meeting, including auxiliary aids or services, may request such modification or accommodation from Planning
Services at (626) 574-5423. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure
accessibility to the meeting.
(626) 574-5423 48
Pursuant to the City of Arcadia’s Language Access Services Policy, limited-English proficient speakers who require translation services
in order to participate in a meeting may request the use of a volunteer or professional translator by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at
(626) 574-5455 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.
626-574-5455
72
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
Marilynne Wilander, Chair
Domenico Tallerico, Vice Chair
David Arvizu, Commissioner
Angela Hui, Commissioner
Vincent Tsoi, Commissioner
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM STAFF REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS
PUBLIC COMMENTS (5 minute time limit per person)
Each speaker is limited to five (5) minutes per person, unless waived by the Planning Commission.
Under the Brown Act, the Commission or Board Members are prohibited from discussing or taking
action on any item not listed on the posted agenda.
PUBLIC HEARING
All interested persons are invited to appear at a public hearing and to provide evidence or testimony
concerning any of the proposed items set forth below for consideration. Separate and apart from
the applicant (who may speak longer at the discretion of the Commission) speakers shall be limited
to five (5) minutes per person. The applicant may additionally submit rebuttal comments, at the
discretion of the Commission.
You are hereby advised that should you desire to legally challenge in court or in an administrative
proceeding any action taken by the City Council regarding any public hearing item, you may be
limited to raising only those issues and objections you or someone else raised at the public hearing
or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing.
1
1.Resolution No. 2162 –Approving Multiple Family Architectural Design Review No. MFADR
24-03, Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 24-01 (84605), and Protected Tree Encroachment No.
TRE 24-14 for a detached two-unit Mediterranean style, multiple family residential
development at 214 genoa Street
CEQA: Exempt
Recommendation: Adopt
Applicant: Sanyao Design Group Inc.
There is a ten day appeal period. Appeals are to be filed by 4:30 p.m. on Friday, December
20, 2024.
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and can be acted on by
one roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless members of the
Commission, staff, or the public request that specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar
for separate discussion and action.
1. Minutes of the November 26, 2024, Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission
Recommendation: Approve
MATTERS FROM CITY COUNCIL LIAISON
MATTERS FROM PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
MATTERS FROM ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
MATTERS FROM STAFF INCLUDING UPCOMING AGENDA ITEMS
ADJOURNMENT
The Planning Commission will adjourn this meeting to Tuesday, January 14, 2025, at 7:00 p.m.
2
Welcome to the Arcadia Planning Commission Meeting!
The Planning Commission encourages public participation and invites you to share your views on City
business.
MEETINGS: Regular Meetings of the Planning Commission are held on the second and fourth Tuesdays of
each month at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. A full Planning Commission agenda packet with all
backup information is available at City Hall, the Arcadia Public Library, and on the City’s website at
www.ArcadiaCA.gov. Copies of individual Agenda Reports are available via email upon request
(Planning@ArcadiaCA.gov). Documents distributed to a majority of the Planning Commission after the posting
of this agenda will be available for review at the Planning Services Office in City Hall, 240 W. Huntington Drive,
Arcadia, California.
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: Your participation is welcomed and invited at all Planning Commission meetings.
Time is reserved at each regular meeting for those in the audience who wish to address the Planning
Commission. The City requests that persons addressing the Planning Commission refrain from making
personal, slanderous, profane, or disruptive remarks. When the Chair asks for those who wish to speak please
come to the podium and state your name and address for the record. Please provide a copy of any written
materials used in your address to the Planning Commission as well as a copy of any printed materials you
wish to be distributed to the Planning Commission.
MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA should be presented during the time designated as “PUBLIC
COMMENTS.” In general, each speaker will be given (5) minutes to address the Planning Commission;
however, the Chair, at his/her discretion, may shorten the speaking time limit to allow all speakers time to
address the Planning Commission. By State law, the Planning Commission may not discuss or vote on
items not on the agenda. The matter will automatically be referred to staff for appropriate action or
response, or will be placed on the agenda of a future meeting.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND APPEALS are items scheduled for which public input is either required or desired.
Separate and apart from an applicant or appellant (who may speak longer at the discretion of the Planning
Commission), speakers shall be limited to (5) minutes per person. The Chair, at his/her discretion, may shorten
the speaking time limit to allow all speakers to address the Planning Commission. The applicant or appellant
may also be afforded an additional opportunity for rebuttal comments.
AGENDA ITEMS: The Agenda contains the regular order of business of the Planning Commission. Items on
the Agenda have generally been reviewed and investigated by the City Staff in advance of the meeting so that
the Planning Commission can be fully informed about a matter before making its decision.
CONSENT CALENDAR: Items listed on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the Planning
Commission and may be acted upon by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items
unless a member of the Planning Commission, Staff, or the public so requests. In this event, the item will be
removed from the Consent Calendar and considered and acted on separately.
DECORUM: While members of the public are free to level criticism of City policies and the action(s) or
proposed action(s) of the Planning Commission or its members, members of the public may not engage in
behavior that is disruptive to the orderly conduct of the proceedings, including, but not limited to, conduct that
prevents other members of the audience from being heard when it is their opportunity to speak, or which
prevents members of the audience from hearing or seeing the proceedings. Members of the public may not
threaten any person with physical harm or act in a manner that may reasonably be interpreted as an imminent
threat of physical harm. All persons attending the meeting are expected to adhere to the City’s policy barring
harassment based upon a person’s race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap,
medical condition, marital status, gender, sexual orientation, or age. The Chief of Police, or such member or
members of the Police Department, may serve as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Planning Commission meeting.
The Sergeant-at-Arms shall carry out all orders and instructions given by the presiding official for the purpose
of maintaining order and decorum at the meeting. Any person who violates the order and decorum of the
meeting may be placed under arrest and such person may be prosecuted under the provisions of Penal Code
Section 403 or applicable Arcadia Municipal Code section.
3
(Arcadia Public Library) (www.ArcadiaCA.gov)
(Planning@ArcadiaCA.gov)
(City Hall, 240 W. Huntington Drive, Arcadia,
California)
“” (5)
(5)
“”
“”
403
4
DATE: December 10, 2024
TO: Honorable Chair and Planning Commission
FROM: Lisa L. Flores, Deputy Development Services Director
By: Gary Yesayan, Associate Planner
SUBJECT: RESOLUTION NO. 2162 - APPROVING MULTIPLE FAMILY
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. MFADR 24-03, TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP NO. TPM 24-01 (84605), AND PROTECTED TREE
ENCROACHMENT NO. TRE 24-14 FOR A DETACHED TWO-UNIT
MEDITERRANEAN STYLE, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT AT 214 GENOA STREET
CEQA: Exempt
Recommendation: Adopt
SUMMARY
The Applicant, Sanyao Design Group Inc., is requesting approval of Multiple Family
Architectural Design Review No. MFADR 24-03, Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 24-01
(84605), and Protected Tree Encroachment Permit No. TRE 24-14, for a proposed
Mediterranean style, two-unit multiple family residential development at 214 Genoa
Street.
Plan, Development Code, and Subdivision Code.
It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2162 (Attachment
No. 1) and find this project Categorically Exempt under the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) and approve MFADR 24-03, TPM 24-01 (84605), and TRE 24-14
subject to the conditions listed in this staff report.
BACKGROUND
The subject property is a 9,308 square foot interior lot located on the south side of Genoa
Street, between Second and Third Avenue. The property is zoned R-2, Medium Density
Multiple Family Residential with a General Plan Land Use Designation of Medium Density
Residential, and is surrounded by other R-2 zoned properties. The project site is currently
5
Resolution No. 2162 - MFADR 24-03, TPM 24-01 (84605), & TRE 24-14
214 Genoa Street
December 10, 2024 Page 2 of 14
developed with two single-story, single-family houses refer to Attachment No. 2 for the
aerial image with zoning information, and Figure 1 below for the street view.
A Certificate of Demolition (COD) was approved on September 23, 2024. Based on the
evaluation by an Architectural Historian, the buildings on the property do not meet any
of the minimum requirements for designation as a historical resource under the federal,
state, and local criteria. The residences are not a good example of any architectural
style and are not representative of or associated with any important historical events or
people. The structures have not yet been demolished
policy for residential projects, which requires approval of a new project prior to demolition
of the structures on the site.
PROPOSAL
The Applicant is proposing to demolish the two existing houses and construct two new
detached, two-story, Mediterranean style multiple family residential condominium
development refer to Attachment No. 3 for the Tentative Parcel Map and Attachment
No. 4 for the Architectural Plans. Both units will have four bedrooms and five bathrooms,
and the first unit will be approximately 2,925 square feet, and the second unit will be
approximately 2,755 square feet. The property will be accessed from Genoa Street and
each of the units will have a two-car garage refer to Figure 2 below. The development
will have an overall building height of approximately - which is below the maximum
height limit of - for R-2 zones. The development will also meet all the required
setbacks, and in some areas will provide greater than the minimum requirement. The
development will provide one guest parking space (one for every two units), as required
by the Development Code, as well as adequate bicycle parking/storage on the west side
Figure 1 Street View at 214 Genoa St.
6
Resolution No. 2162 - MFADR 24-03, TPM 24-01 (84605), & TRE 24-14
214 Genoa Street
December 10, 2024 Page 3 of 14
of the property. The project will provide 200 square feet of private open space areas for
each unit, which exceeds the minimum requirement of 100 square feet per unit.
The site also has a 12-inch Coast Live Oak tree located at the northerly side yard area of
the site which will be preserved and protected. However, an encroachment permit is
required since a portion of the first unit (Unit A) encroaches within - 15 foot
protected zone, as measured from the trunk of the tree. The protected zone is greater
than the dripline of the tree.
ANALYSIS
The R-2 zone requires a minimum density of two units per lot, and a maximum density of
one unit per 3,750 square feet of lot area. With the subject lot being approximately 9,308
square feet, this calculates to a minimum and maximum density of two (2) units.
Therefore, the proposed two-unit development complies with the density requirement of
the underlying R-2 zone. As noted, the project will comply with the development standards
of the R-2 zone, including but not limited to setbacks, height, and parking.
Concurrently with the subdivision application, the Planning Commission is to approve,
conditionally approve, or deny the architectural design of the proposed project. The
buildings are representative of Mediterranean architecture, incorporating character
defining features such as but not limited to blend of terracotta burgundy tile roofing,
arched windows and doorways, stucco exterior, and decorative wrought iron balcony
railings and gates - refer to Figure 3 below for a color rendering and Attachment No. 4 for
the Architectural Plans.
The massing and scale of this project will be compatible with many other similar two-story,
multi-family developments found within this immediate neighborhood, which consists of
various architectural styles that include Mediterranean, Traditional, Spanish, and other
simpler non-descript architecture. The development will have water efficient landscaping
that will enhance the project site, as well as its neighborhood character. Additionally, the
Figure 2 Site Plan
7
Resolution No. 2162 - MFADR 24-03, TPM 24-01 (84605), & TRE 24-14
214 Genoa Street
December 10, 2024 Page 4 of 14
General Plan, Multiple-Family Residential Design Guidelines, the Development Code,
and the State Subdivision Map Act.
Figure 3 Color rendering
Protected Tree Encroachment
The site has two unprotected Tree
of Heaven Ailanthus Alrissima
trees and one Coast Live Oak tree
within the northerly side yard area
of the lot. One of the unprotected
trees will be removed to
accommodate the proposed
development, and a portion of Unit
A will be located -
tree,
which is its protected zone. The
-
trunk of the tree. As a result, an
Encroachment Permit is required
to allow a portion of Unit A to be
located within the protected zone,
however, no portion of the unit will
be located within the dripline of the
tree. The Certified Arborist determined that with the recommended protection measures,
the tree is expected to survive demolition and development activities, and minimal
Figure 4 Coast live oak tree location
8
Resolution No. 2162 - MFADR 24-03, TPM 24-01 (84605), & TRE 24-14
214 Genoa Street
December 10, 2024 Page 5 of 14
trimming will be required to provide clearance for the new building refer to Attachment
No. 5 for the Tree Report. Figure 4 shows the location of the protected Coast Live Oak.
Upon completion of the project and prior to the issuance of the certificate of occupancy,
a report from a certified arborist will be required to verify the condition of the protected
Oak on site.
FINDINGS
Tentative Parcel Map
The proposed subdivision complies with the subdivision regulations of the Development
Code, and the Subdivision Map Act, and the Regional Water Quality Control Board
requirements. The following findings are required for approval of the Tentative Parcel
Map:
1. The proposed map, subdivision design, and improvements are consistent with
the General Plan, any applicable specific plan, and the Subdivisions Division
of the Development Code.
Facts to Support this Finding: The proposed tentative parcel map for a two-unit
multi-family residential condominium development and subdivision of the airspace
Code, and the Subdivision Map Act. It has been determined that the proposed
subdivision is consistent with the General Plan Medium Density Residential Land
Use designation and the R-2, Medium Density Multiple Family Residential zoning
designation. These designations are intended to accommodate medium density
residential units such as condominiums.
The proposed tentative parcel map complies with the Subdivision Map Act and the
City' regulations because the proposed two-unit condominium development is at the
allowed density requirements of the underlying zone, and it complies with all the
zoning requirements as well as the requirements to subdivide the airspace. The site
is physically suitable for this type of development and the approval of the
architectural design for the building is compatible with the scale and character of the
existing neighborhood.
The project would not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan and is
consistent with the following General Plan goals and policies:
Land Use and Community Design Element
Policy LU-1.1: Promote new infill and redevelopment projects that are consistent
with surrounding existing uses.
9
Resolution No. 2162 - MFADR 24-03, TPM 24-01 (84605), & TRE 24-14
214 Genoa Street
December 10, 2024 Page 6 of 14
Policy LU-4.1: Require that new multifamily residential development be visually
and functionally integrated and consistent in scale, mass, and character with
structures in the surrounding neighborhood.
2. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of
development.
Facts to Support this Finding: The R-2 Zone requires a minimum density of one
dwelling unit per lot and a maximum density of one unit per 3,750 square feet of lot
area. Based on the lot area of 9,308 square feet, a minimum and maximum of two
(2) units may be developed at this site. Therefore, the proposed two-unit
development complies with the density requirements of the underlying zone, as well
as all other applicable zoning requirements including but not limited to parking,
setbacks, height, and open space. The site is physically suitable for the proposed
two-unit multi-family residential development.
3. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely
to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably
injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
Facts to Support this Finding: The proposed project is an infill site within an
urbanized area and does not serve as a habitat for endangered or rare species.
Therefore, the project would not cause substantial environmental damage or impact
to wildlife.
4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause
serious public health or safety problems.
Facts to Support this Finding: The proposed subdivision is to subdivide the
airspace of two units for condominium purposes. The construction will be in
compliance with all applicable Building and Fire Codes to ensure public health and
safety. The proposed density would not exceed the sites limits since allowed for the
R-2
development. Therefore, the development will not cause any public health or safety
problems.
5. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict
with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of,
property within the proposed subdivision.
Facts to Support this Finding: The proposed design of the subdivision does not
conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of
property within the proposed subdivision. There are no known easements on the
subject property.
10
Resolution No. 2162 - MFADR 24-03, TPM 24-01 (84605), & TRE 24-14
214 Genoa Street
December 10, 2024 Page 7 of 14
6. The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the community
sewer system will not result in violation of existing requirements specified by
the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Facts to Support this Finding: The Arcadia Public Works Services Department
development and the requirements of the California Regional Water Quality Control
Board would be satisfied.
7. The proposed design and site improvements of the subdivision conform to
the regulations of this Development Code and the regulations of any public
agency having jurisdiction by law.
Facts to Support this Finding: The proposed design of the multi-family
development standards are being met and all improvements required for the site and
No
public agency that has jurisdiction by law has found that the proposed development
does not conform to any of their regulations.
Architectural Design Review
The proposed development is located within the Medium Density Residential (R-2) Zone,
which is intended to provide a variety of attached or detached single and multiple family
homes and duplexes. The proposed design of the two-unit condominium project is
compatible with existing multi-family developments in the surrounding neighborhood in
terms of design, massing, and scale. The proposed Mediterranean architectural design
would be compatible and will fit well with other existing multi-family developments along
Genoa Street. The neighborhood includes other such Mediterranean, Traditional,
Spanish, and other generic non-descript architecture. The architectural elements
incorporated in this design, such as terracotta tile roofing, arched windows and doorways,
stucco exterior, and decorative wrought iron balcony railings and gates are indicative of
the Mediterranean style and consistent with developments in the vicinity that have similar
features. Additionally, the massing and scale of the new development will not be out of
character with developments in the vicinity as it is two stories and under the maximum
allowed height. The proposed buildings have ample articulation on all sides, providing
visual interest and appropriate mass. The proposed design is therefore consistent with
All City requirements regarding disabled access and facilities, occupancy limits, building
safety, health code compliance, emergency equipment, environmental regulation
compliance, and parking and site design shall be complied with by the property
owner/applicant to the satisfaction of the Building Official, City Engineer, Deputy
Development Services Director, Fire Marshal, and Public Works Services Director, or
their respective designees.
11
Resolution No. 2162 - MFADR 24-03, TPM 24-01 (84605), & TRE 24-14
214 Genoa Street
December 10, 2024 Page 8 of 14
The following findings are required for the approval of a Site Plan and Design Review
pursuant to Development Code Section 9107.19.050.F.
8. The proposed development will be in compliance with all applicable
development standards and regulation in the Development Code.
Facts to Support this Finding: The subject site is zoned R-2, Medium Density
Residential Zone, which allows a maximum and minimum density of two (2) units for
this lot. The proposed development will not change the use or density allowed in this
zone and will meet all of the development standards and regulations required,
including but not limited to setbacks, height, open space, parking, etc. Therefore,
the new development will be in compliance with all the applicable standards and
-Family Design
Guidelines.
9. The proposed development will be consistent in the objectives and standards
of the applicable Design Guidelines.
Facts to Support this Finding: The proposed development, in terms of the overall
mass, height, and scale of the buildings, will be consistent with the built environment
and the newer multi--Family
Residential Design Guidelines. The Mediterranean architectural style of this
development fits well and complements the other single-story and two-story multi-
family developments within the neighborhood that also includes Mediterranean,
Spanish, Traditional and other less descriptive architecture. The proposed design
provides ample vertical and horizontal articulation in addition to all the character
defining features and elements appropriate for Mediterranean architecture.
Therefore, the proposed development will be consistent with the objectives and
standards of the Multiple-Family Design Guidelines.
10. The proposed development will be compatible in terms of scale and aesthetic
design with surrounding properties and developments.
Facts to Support this Finding: The proposed development would be compatible
with the character of the neighborhood in terms of the architectural design and scale
since the subject site is in a multi-family neighborhood that consists of other similar
two-story buildings. The Mediterranean style buildings provide well-articulated
design in terms of visual separation along its vertical and horizontal planes. Tile
roofing, arched windows and doorways, including decorative wrought iron balcony
aesthetic
appearance. Additionally, newly designed landscaping throughout the entre site will
provide an added aesthetic enhancement to the site. Therefore, this finding can be
met.
12
Resolution No. 2162 - MFADR 24-03, TPM 24-01 (84605), & TRE 24-14
214 Genoa Street
December 10, 2024 Page 9 of 14
11. The proposed development will have an adequate and efficient site layout in
terms of access, vehicular circulation, parking, and landscaping.
Facts to Support this Finding: The proposed development will have one main
driveway that will provide ingress and egress from Genoa Street for both units. The
proposed development will comply with the minimum requirement for back-out,
driveway widths, open space, guest parking, and required bicycle parking. The
proposed landscaping will complement the architectural design, provide screening
along the sides and rear property lines, and meet Multiple
Family Design Guidelines.
12. The proposed development will be in compliance with all of the applicable
criteria identified in Subparagraph 9107.19.040.C.5 for compliance with the
Development Code and all other applicable City regulations and policies, the
General Plan and any appliable specific plan, the Design Guidelines, policies
and standards, and efficient site and layout design.
Facts to Support this Finding: The proposed development as evaluated complies
-2, Medium Density Residential
zone. The project is in compliance with -Family Residential Design
Guidelines as the proposed development will have an appropriate mass, scale, and
design that fits well with the other structures in the immediate vicinity. Extensive new
landscaping throughout will complement the home and provide additional screening
along both side and the rear property lines. The driveway for the site is appropriately
designed to provide efficient and safe access for the residents and guests. No major
impacts on or off-site are expected from this project. Therefore, the proposed
residential development Family Residential
Design Guidelines and General Plan.
Protected Tree Encroachment
The following findings are required for the approval of a Protected Tree Encroachment
Permit per Development Code Section 9110.01.070(A)
Why is tree encroachment necessary; and
Why encroachment is more desirable than alternative project designs.
The request to allow a 12-inch Coast Live Oak tree to encroach within the protected zone
is necessary to achieve the construction of two units, the minimum allowable density for
this site. The proposed encroachment has been carefully planned to ensure the tree's
health is preserved, eliminating the need for its removal. Additionally, an alternative
design would not be more favorable, as the current proposal minimizes impact on the tree
while meeting site requirements.
13
Resolution No. 2162 - MFADR 24-03, TPM 24-01 (84605), & TRE 24-14
214 Genoa Street
December 10, 2024 Page 10 of 14
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
It has been determined that the project site is less than five (5) acres; the project site has
no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; the proposed project
will not have any significant effects upon the environment, and the site can be adequately
served by all the required utilities and public services. Therefore, the project is exempt
under Class 32 (In-Fill Development Projects) pursuant to Section 15332 of the State
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines - refer to Attachment No. 6 for
the Preliminary Exemption Assessment.
PUBLIC NOTICE/COMMENTS
A public hearing notice for this item was mailed to the property owners located within 300
feet of the subject property on November 27, 2024. Both structures on site are vacant
therefore tenant noticing is not applicable. As of December 5, 2024, no comments were
received regarding this project.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission approve Multiple Family Architectural
Design Review No. MFADR 24-03, Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 24-01 (84605), and
Protected Tree Encroachment No. TRE 24-14, find the project Categorically Exempt from
the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and adopt Resolution No. 2162, subject
to the following conditions of approval:
1. The project shall be developed and maintained by the Applicant/Property Owner in
a manner that is consistent with the plans submitted and conditionally approved for
MFADR 24-03, TPM 24-01 (84605), and TRE 24-14 subject to the approval of the
Deputy Development Services Director, or designee.
2. Any required mechanical equipment, such as backflow devices, visible from the
public right-of-way shall be screened from public view. Screening may include
landscaping, solid walls or other methods deemed appropriate for the development.
The placement and height of said screening shall be subject to review and approval
by the Deputy Development Services Director, or designee.
3. Prior to demolition or grading activity, a - freestanding or ground staked
chain-link, or wire mesh fencing shall be installed at least - around the Coast
Live Oak tree on site. There shall be no storage of equipment or construction
materials within the fenced area.
4. The Applicant/ Property Owner shall comply with all the required tree protection
measures listed in the Tree Report, dated August 8, 2024. If the Certified Arborist
determines that the tree will not survive at the time the follow-up report is prepared,
then the Applicant shall plant a new 36-inch box Coast Live Oak tree on the subject
14
Resolution No. 2162 - MFADR 24-03, TPM 24-01 (84605), & TRE 24-14
214 Genoa Street
December 10, 2024 Page 11 of 14
site prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The location and type shall be
approved by the Deputy Development Services Director or designee.
5. Prior to a Certificate of Occupancy, the following off-site improvements shall be
completed:
a. The existing driveway shall be removed and replaced with a new driveway
subject to the City of Arcadia Standards.
b. The existing sidewalk along the project site shall be removed and replaced
with a new sidewalk in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act
(ADA).
c. The existing curb and gutter along the project site shall be removed and
replaced with two-inch slot cut from property line to property line.
d. Any improvement(s) in the right-of-way shall be subject to review, approval,
and applicable permits by the Engineering Department.
e. All overhead utilities shall be relocated underground.
6. Prior to occupancy, the developer shall repair any damage caused by the
development to the street frontages including but not limited to trench cuts and
construction traffic, per the direction of the City Engineer.
7. The project shall comply with the latest adopted edition of the following codes as
applicable:
a. California Building Code
b. California Electrical Code
c. California Mechanical Code
d. California Plumbing Code
e. California Energy Code
f. California Fire Code
g. California Green Building Standards Code
h. California Existing Building Code
i. Arcadia Municipal Code
8. The project shall comply with Chapter 35A Multiple Family Construction Standards
as amended in the Arcadia Municipal Code Section 8130.20.
9. A demolition permit shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Division prior to
the removal and/or demolition of structures on site.
10. Separate water meters shall be installed for each unit. A common water meter may
be used for each unit to supply both domestic water services and fire services.
11. The fire water service and domestic water service shall be separated with an
approved back flow device.
15
Resolution No. 2162 - MFADR 24-03, TPM 24-01 (84605), & TRE 24-14
214 Genoa Street
December 10, 2024 Page 12 of 14
12. A separate water service and meter shall be provided for common area irrigation
uses. An approved back flow prevention device shall be installed.
13. Prior to building permit issuance, a Water Meter Permit Application shall be
submitted to the Public Works Services Department.
14. A new water service shall be installed by the Developer according to the
specifications of the Public Works Services Department, Engineering Section.
Abandonment of existing water services, if necessary, shall be carried out by the
Developer, according to Public Works Services Department, Engineering Division
specifications.
15. An approved backwater valve shall be required if any drainage fixture elevation is
lower than the elevation of the next upstream manhole cover.
16. Any electrical transformer recommended or required by the utility company shall be
placed outside of the public right-of-way, and on private property.
17. All structures shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system per the City
-Family Dwelling Sprinkler Standard.
18. A knox switch shall be provided for Fire Department access on all gates.
19. The Applicant/Property Owner shall comply with all City requirements regarding
building safety, fire prevention, detection, suppression, emergency access, public
right-of-way improvements, parking, water supply and water facilities, sewer
facilities, trash reduction and recycling requirements, and National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) measures to the satisfaction of the Building
Official, Fire Marshal, Public Works Services Director, and Deputy Development
Services Director. Compliance with these requirements is to be determined by
having fully detailed construction plans submitted for plan check review and approval
by the foregoing City officials and employees.
20. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Applicant must defend, indemnify, and
hold the City, any departments, agencies, divisions, boards, and/or commissions of
the City, and its elected officials, officers, contractors serving as City officials, agents,
e
damages and/or claims, actions, or proceedings for damages for personal injuries,
including death, and claims for property damage, and with respect to all other actions
and liabilities for damages caused or alleged to have been caused by reason of the
Review No. MFADR 24-03, Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 24-01 (84605), and
Protected Tree Encroachment No. TRE 24-14
which may arise from the direct or indirect operations of the Applicant or those of the
16
Resolution No. 2162 - MFADR 24-03, TPM 24-01 (84605), & TRE 24-14
214 Genoa Street
December 10, 2024 Page 13 of 14
Project. This indemnity provision applies to all damages and claims, actions, or
proceedings for damages, as described above, regardless of whether the City
prepared, supplied, or approved the plans, specifications, or other documents for
the Project.
In the event of any legal action challenging the validity, applicability, or interpretation
of any provision of this approval, or any other supporting document relating to the
Project, the City will notify the Applicant of the claim, action, or proceedings and will
cooperate in the defense of the matter. The Applicant must indemnify, defend and
hold harmless the Indemnitees, and each of them, with respect to all liability, costs
and expenses incurred by, and/or awarded against, the City or any of the
Indem
such action, the Applicant shall provide to the City a cash deposit to cover legal fees,
costs, and expenses incurred by City in connection with defense of any legal action
in an initial amount to be reasonably determined by the City Attorney. The City may
draw funds from the deposit for such fees, costs, and expenses. Within 5 business
days of each and every notice from City that the deposit has fallen below the initial
amount,
legal team to continue working on the matter. The City shall only refund to the
Developer any unexpended funds from the deposit within 30 days of: (i) a final, non-
appealable decision by a court of competent jurisdiction resolving the legal action;
or (ii) full and complete settlement of legal action. The City shall have the right to
select legal counsel of its choice. The parties hereby agree to cooperate in defending
such action. The City will not voluntarily assist in any such third-party challenge(s).
In consideration for approval of the Project, this condition shall remain in effect if the
entitlement(s) related to this Project is rescinded or revoked, at the request of the
Applicant or not.
21. Approval of MFADR 24-03, TPM 24-01 (84605), and TRE 24-14, shall not be in
effect unless the Property Owner and Applicant have executed and filed the
Acceptance Form with the City on or before 30 calendar days after the Planning
Commission has adopted the Resolution. The executed Acceptance Form submitted
to the Development Services Department is to indicate awareness and acceptance
of the conditions of approval.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION
Approval
If the Planning Commission intends to approve this project, the Commission should move
to approve Multiple Family Architectural Design Review No. MFADR 24-03, Tentative
Parcel Map No. TPM 24-01 (84605) and Protected Tree Encroachment No. TRE 24-14,
state that the proposal satisfies the requisite findings, and adopt the attached Resolution
17
Resolution No. 2162 - MFADR 24-03, TPM 24-01 (84605), & TRE 24-14
214 Genoa Street
December 10, 2024 Page 14 of 14
No. 2162 that incorporates the requisite environmental and subdivision findings, and the
conditions of approval as presented in this staff report, or as modified by the Commission.
Denial
If the Planning Commission is to deny this project, the Commission should state the
specific findings that the proposal does not satisfy based on the evidence presented with
specific reasons for denial, and move to deny Multiple Family Architectural Design Review
MFADR 24-03, Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 24-01 (84605) and Protected Tree
Encroachment No. TRE 24-14, and direct staff to prepare a resolution for adoption at the
.
If any Planning Commissioner, or other interested party has questions or comments
regarding this matter prior to the December 10, 2024, Planning Commission hearing,
please contact Associate Planner, Gary Yesayan at (626) 574-5422, or by email at
gyesayan@ArcadiaCA.gov
Approved:
Lisa L. Flores
Deputy Development Services Director
Attachment No. 1: Resolution No. 2162
Attachment No. 2: Aerial image with zoning information
Attachment No. 3: Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 24-01 (84605)
Attachment No. 4: Architectural Plans
Attachment No. 5: Arborist Report dated August 8, 2024
Attachment No. 6: Preliminary Exemption Assessment
18
Attachment No. 1
Attachment No. 1
Resolution No. 2162
19
RESOLUTION NO. 2162
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MULTIPLE FAMILY
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. MFADR 24-03, TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP NO. TPM 24-01 (84605), AND PROTECTED TREE
ENCROACHMENT NO. TRE 24-14 FOR A DETACHED TWO-UNIT
MEDITERRANEAN STYLE, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DEVELOPMENT AT 214 GENOA STREET
WHEREAS, applications for Multiple Family Architectural Design Review No.
MFADR 24-03, Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 24-01 (84605), and Protected Tree
Encroachment Permit No. TRE 24-14 were filed by Sanyao Design Group Inc., for a two-
unit multiple family residential condominium development, a tentative parcel map for the
subdivision of the airspace, and protected tree encroachment at 214 Genoa Street
(collectively, “Project”); and
WHEREAS, on October 26, 2024, Planning Services completed an environmental
assessment for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(“CEQA”), and recommended that the Planning Commission determine the Project is
exempt under CEQA per Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines because the Project is
considered an in-fill development project; and
WHEREAS, on December 10, 2024, a duly-noticed public hearing was held before
the Planning Commission on said Project, at which time all interested persons were given
full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The factual data submitted by the Community Development Division
in the staff report dated December 10, 2024, are true and correct.
SECTION 2. This Commission finds, based upon the entire record:
20
2
Tentative Parcel Map
1. The proposed map, subdivision design, and improvements are consistent
with the General Plan, any applicable specific plan, and the Subdivisions Division of the
Development Code:
FACT: The proposed tentative parcel map for a two-unit multi-family residential
condominium development and subdivision of the airspace has been reviewed for
compliance with the City’s General Plan and Development Code, and the Subdivision
Map Act. It has been determined that the proposed subdivision is consistent with the
General Plan Medium Density Residential Land Use designation and the R-2, Medium
Density Multiple Family Residential zoning designation, respectively. These designations
are intended to accommodate high density residential units such as condominiums.
The proposed tentative parcel map complies with the Subdivision Map Act and the
City's regulations because the proposed two-unit condominium development is at the
allowed density requirements of the underlying zone, and it complies with all the zoning
requirements as well as the requirements to subdivide the airspace. The site is physically
suitable for this type of development and the approval of the architectural design for the
building is compatible with the scale and character of the existing neighborhood.
The project would not adversely affect the comprehensive General Plan and is
consistent with the following General Plan goals and policies:
Land Use and Community Design Element
Policy LU-1.1: Promote new infill and redevelopment projects that are
consistent with the City’s land use and compatible with surrounding existing uses.
21
3
Policy LU-4.1: Require that new multifamily residential development be
visually and functionally integrated and consistent in scale, mass, and character with
structures in the surrounding neighborhood.
2. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of
development:
FACT: The R-2 Zone requires a minimum density of one dwelling unit per lot and
a maximum density of one unit per 3,750 square feet of lot area. Based on the lot area of
9,308 square feet, a minimum and maximum of two (2) units may be developed at this
site. Therefore, the proposed two-unit development complies with the density
requirements of the underlying zone, as well as all other applicable zoning requirements
including but not limited to parking, setbacks, height, and open space. The site is
physically suitable for the proposed two-unit multi-family residential development.
3. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not likely
to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or
wildlife or their habitat:
FACT: The proposed project is an infill site within an urbanized area and does not
serve as a habitat for endangered or rare species. Therefore, the project would not cause
substantial environmental damage or impact to wildlife.
4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to cause
serious public health or safety problems:
FACT: The proposed subdivision is to subdivide the airspace of two-units for
condominium purposes. The construction will be in compliance with all applicable Building
and Fire Codes to ensure public health and safety. The proposed density would not
22
4
exceed the sites limits since allowed for the R-2 zone and the City’s existing infrastructure
will adequately serve the new development. Therefore, the development will not cause
any public health or safety problems.
5. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with
easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of, property within
the proposed subdivision (This finding shall apply only to easements of record or to
easements established by judgement of a court of competent jurisdiction and no authority
is hereby granted to a legislate body to determine that the public at large has acquired
easements for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision):
FACT: The proposed design of the subdivision does not conflict with easements
acquired by the public at large for access through or use of property within the proposed
subdivision. There are no known easements on the subject property.
6. The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the community
sewer system will not result in violation of existing requirements specified by the California
Regional Water Quality Control Board:
FACT: The Arcadia Public Works Services Department determined that the City’s
existing infrastructure would adequately serve the new development and the
requirements of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board would be satisfied.
7. The proposed design and site improvements of the subdivision conform to the
regulations of this Development Code and the regulations of any public agency having
jurisdiction by law.
FACT: The proposed design of the multi-family development is in conformance
with the City’s Development Code, as all development standards are being met and all
23
5
improvements required for the site and each unit would comply with the regulations in the
City’s Development Code. No public agency that has jurisdiction by law has found that
the proposed development does not conform to any of their regulations.
Architectural Design Review
8. The proposed development will be in compliance with all applicable
development standards and regulation in the Development Code.
FACT: The subject site is zoned R-2, Medium Density Residential Zone, which
allows a maximum and minimum density of two (2) units for this lot. The proposed
development will not change the use or density allowed in this zone and will meet all of
the development standards and regulations required, including but not limited to setbacks,
height, open space, parking, etc. Therefore, the new development will be in compliance
with all the applicable standards and regulations in the Development Code, and the City’s
Multiple-Family Design Guidelines.
9. The proposed development will be consistent with the objectives and
standards of the applicable Design Guidelines.
FACT: The proposed development, in terms of the overall mass, height, and scale
of the buildings, will be consistent with the built environment and the newer multi-family
condominiums and with the City’s Multiple-Family Residential Design Guidelines. The
Mediterranean architectural style of this development fits well and complements the other
single-story and two-story multi-family developments within the neighborhood that also
includes Mediterranean, Spanish, Traditional and other less descriptive architecture. The
proposed design provides ample vertical and horizontal articulation in addition to all the
character defining features and elements appropriate for Mediterranean architecture.
24
6
Therefore, the proposed development will be consistent with the objectives and standards
of the Multiple-Family Design Guidelines.
10. The proposed development will be compatible in terms of scale and aesthetic
design with surrounding properties and developments.
FACT: The proposed development would be compatible with the character of the
neighborhood in terms of the architectural design and scale since the subject site is in a
multi-family neighborhood that consists of other similar two-story buildings. The
Mediterranean style buildings provide well-articulated design in terms of visual separation
along its vertical and horizontal planes. Tile roofing, arched windows and doorways,
including decorative wrought iron balcony railings and gates further enhance the site’s
and the neighborhood’s aesthetic appearance. Additionally, newly designed landscaping
throughout the entre site will provide an added aesthetic enhancement to the site.
Therefore, this finding can be met.
11. The proposed development will have an adequate and efficient site layout in
terms of access, vehicular circulation, parking, and landscaping.
FACT: The proposed development will have one main driveway that will provide
ingress and egress from Genoa Street for both units. The proposed development will
comply with the minimum requirement for back-out, driveway widths, open space, guest
parking, and required bicycle parking. The proposed landscaping will complement the
architectural design, provide screening along the sides and rear property lines, and meet
the intent of the City’s Multiple Family Design Guidelines.
12. The proposed development will be in compliance with all of the applicable
criteria identified in Subparagraph 9107.19.040.C.5 for compliance with the Development
25
7
Code and all other applicable City regulations and policies, the General Plan and any
appliable specific plan, the Design Guidelines, policies and standards, and efficient site
and layout design.
FACT: The proposed development as evaluated complies with all the City’s
development standards in the R-2, Medium Density Residential zone. The project is in
compliance with the City’s Multiple-Family Residential Design Guidelines as the proposed
development will have an appropriate mass, scale, and design that fits well with the other
structures in the immediate vicinity. Extensive new landscaping throughout will
complement the home and provide additional screening along both side and the rear
property lines. The driveway for the site is appropriately designed to provide efficient and
safe access for the residents and guests. No major impacts on or off-site are expected
from this project. Therefore, the proposed residential development will be consistent with
the City’s Multiple Family Residential Design Guidelines and General Plan.
Protected Tree Encroachment
FACT: The request to allow a 12-inch Coast Live Oak tree to encroach within the
protected zone is necessary to achieve the construction of two units, the minimum
allowable density for this site. The proposed encroachment has been carefully planned
to ensure the tree's health is preserved, eliminating the need for its removal. Additionally,
an alternative design would not be more favorable, as the current proposal minimizes
impact on the tree while meeting site requirements.
SECTION 3. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality
Act (“CEQA”), this Project is a Class 32 Categorical Exemption as an infill-development
project per Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines.
26
8
SECTION 4. For the foregoing reasons the Planning Commission determines
that the Project is Categorically Exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act
(“CEQA”) Section 15332 , Class 32, and approves Multiple Family Architectural Design
Review No. MFADR 24-03, Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 24-01 (84605), and Protected
Tree Encroachment Permit No. TRE 24-14, for a two-unit multiple family residential
condominium development at 214 Genoa Street, subject to the conditions of approval
attached hereto.
SECTION 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
[SIGNATURES ON THE NEXT PAGE]
27
9
Passed, approved and adopted this 10th day of December, 2024.
Marilynne Wilander
Chair, Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Lisa L. Flores
Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Michael J. Maurer
City Attorney
28
10
Page Intentionally Left Blank
29
11
RESOLUTION NO. 2162
Conditions of Approval
1. The project shall be developed and maintained by the Applicant/Property Owner in
a manner that is consistent with the plans submitted and conditionally approved for
MFADR 24-03, TPM 24-01 (84605), and TRE 24-14 subject to the approval of the
Deputy Development Services Director, or designee.
2. Any required mechanical equipment, such as backflow devices, visible from the
public right-of-way shall be screened from public view. Screening may include
landscaping, solid walls or other methods deemed appropriate for the development.
The placement and height of said screening shall be subject to review and approval
by the Deputy Development Services Director, or designee.
3. Prior to demolition or grading activity, a 6’-0” tall freestanding or ground staked
chain-link, or wire mesh fencing shall be installed at least 3’-0” around the Coast
Live Oak tree on site. There shall be no storage of equipment or construction
materials within the fenced area.
4. The Applicant/ Property Owner shall comply with all the required tree protection
measures listed in the Tree Report, dated August 8, 2024. If the Certified Arborist
determines that the tree will not survive at the time the follow-up report is prepared,
then the Applicant shall plant a new 36-inch box Coast Live Oak tree on the subject
site prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. The location and type shall be
approved by the Deputy Development Services Director or designee.
5. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, the following off-site improvements shall be
completed:
a. The existing driveway shall be removed and replaced with a new driveway
subject to the City of Arcadia Standards.
b. The existing sidewalk along the project site shall be removed and replaced with
a new sidewalk in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).
c. The existing curb and gutter along the project site shall be removed and replaced
with 2-inch slot cut from property line to property line.
d. Any improvement(s) in the right-of-way shall be subject to review, approval, and
applicable permits by the Engineering Department.
e. All overhead utilities shall be relocated underground.
6. Prior to occupancy, the developer shall repair any damage caused by the
development to the street frontages including but not limited to trench cuts and
construction traffic, per the direction of the City Engineer.
7. The project shall comply with the latest adopted edition of the following codes as
applicable:
30
12
a. California Building Code
b. California Electrical Code
c. California Mechanical Code
d. California Plumbing Code
e. California Energy Code
f. California Fire Code
g. California Green Building Standards Code
h. California Existing Building Code
i. Arcadia Municipal Code
8. The project shall comply with Chapter 35A Multiple Family Construction Standards
as amended in the Arcadia Municipal Code Section 8130.20.
9. A demolition permit shall be obtained from the Building and Safety Division prior to
the removal and/or demolition of structures on site.
10. Separate water meters shall be installed for each unit. A common water meter may
be used for each unit to supply both domestic water services and fire services.
11. The fire water service and domestic water service shall be separated with an
approved back flow device.
12. A separate water service and meter shall be provided for common area irrigation
uses. An approved back flow prevention device shall be installed.
13. Prior to building permit issuance, a Water Meter Permit Application shall be
submitted to the Public Works Services Department.
14. A new water service shall be installed by the Developer according to the
specifications of the Public Works Services Department, Engineering Section.
Abandonment of existing water services, if necessary, shall be carried out by the
Developer, according to Public Works Services Department, Engineering Division
specifications.
15. An approved backwater valve shall be required if any drainage fixture elevation is
lower than the elevation of the next upstream manhole cover.
16. Any electrical transformer recommended or required by the utility company shall be
placed outside of the public right-of-way, and on private property.
17. All structures shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system per the City
of Arcadia Fire Department’s Single & Multi-Family Dwelling Sprinkler Standard.
18. A knox switch shall be provided for Fire Department access on all gates.
31
13
19. The Applicant/Property Owner shall comply with all City requirements regarding
building safety, fire prevention, detection, suppression, emergency access, public
right-of-way improvements, parking, water supply and water facilities, sewer
facilities, trash reduction and recycling requirements, and National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) measures to the satisfaction of the Building
Official, Fire Marshal, Public Works Services Director, and Deputy Development
Services Director. Compliance with these requirements is to be determined by
having fully detailed construction plans submitted for plan check review and approval
by the foregoing City officials and employees.
20. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Applicant must defend, indemnify, and
hold the City, any departments, agencies, divisions, boards, and/or commissions of
the City, and its elected officials, officers, contractors serving as City officials, agents,
employees, and attorneys of the City (“Indemnitees”) harmless from liability for
damages and/or claims, actions, or proceedings for damages for personal injuries,
including death, and claims for property damage, and with respect to all other actions
and liabilities for damages caused or alleged to have been caused by reason of the
Applicant’s activities in connection with this Multiple Family Architectural Design
Review No. MFADR 24-03, Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 24-01 (84605), and
Protected Tree Encroachment No. TRE 24-14 (“Project”) on the Project site, and
which may arise from the direct or indirect operations of the Applicant or those of the
Applicant’s contractors, agents, tenants, employees or any other persons acting on
Applicant’s behalf, which relate to the development and/or construction of the
Project. This indemnity provision applies to all damages and claims, actions, or
proceedings for damages, as described above, regardless of whether the City
prepared, supplied, or approved the plans, specifications, or other documents for
the Project.
In the event of any legal action challenging the validity, applicability, or interpretation
of any provision of this approval, or any other supporting document relating to the
Project, the City will notify the Applicant of the claim, action, or proceedings and will
cooperate in the defense of the matter. The Applicant must indemnify, defend and
hold harmless the Indemnitees, and each of them, with respect to all liability, costs
and expenses incurred by, and/or awarded against, the City or any of the
Indemnitees in relation to such action. Within 15 days’ notice from the City of any
such action, the Applicant shall provide to the City a cash deposit to cover legal fees,
costs, and expenses incurred by City in connection with defense of any legal action
in an initial amount to be reasonably determined by the City Attorney. The City may
draw funds from the deposit for such fees, costs, and expenses. Within 5 business
days of each and every notice from City that the deposit has fallen below the initial
amount, Applicant shall replenish the deposit each and every time in order for City’s
legal team to continue working on the matter. The City shall only refund to the
Developer any unexpended funds from the deposit within 30 days of: (i) a final, non-
appealable decision by a court of competent jurisdiction resolving the legal action;
or (ii) full and complete settlement of legal action. The City shall have the right to
select legal counsel of its choice. The parties hereby agree to cooperate in defending
32
14
such action. The City will not voluntarily assist in any such third-party challenge(s).
In consideration for approval of the Project, this condition shall remain in effect if the
entitlement(s) related to this Project is rescinded or revoked, at the request of the
Applicant or not.
21. Approval of MFADR 24-03, TPM 24-01 (84605), and TRE 24-14, shall not be in
effect unless the Property Owner and Applicant have executed and filed the
Acceptance Form with the City on or before 30 calendar days after the Planning
Commission has adopted the Resolution. The executed Acceptance Form submitted
to the Development Services Department is to indicate awareness and acceptance
of the conditions of approval.
---
33
Attachment No. 2
Attachment No. 2
Aerial Image with Zoning Information
34
Overlays
Selected parcel highlighted
Parcel location within City of Arcadia
N/A
Property Owner(s):
Lot Area (sq ft):
Year Built:
Main Structure / Unit (sq. ft.):
R-2
Number of Units:
MDR
Property Characteristics
1962
1,140
2
Property Owner
Site Address:214 GENOA ST
Parcel Number: 5779-018-013
N/A
Zoning:
General Plan:
N/A
Downtown Overlay:
Downtown Parking Overlay:
Architectural Design Overlay:N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Residential Flex Overlay:
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Special Height Overlay:
N/A
Parking Overlay:
Racetrack Event Overlay:
This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for
reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current,
or otherwise reliable.
Report generated 25-Nov-2024
Page 1 of 1 35
Attachment No. 3
Attachment No. 3
Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 24-01
(84605)
36
37
Attachment No. 4
Attachment No. 4
Architectural Plans
38
CLO.
2-CAR GARAGE
(444 S.F.)
LIVING RM.DINING RM.
KITCHEN
LA
U
N
D
R
Y
PWDR.RM.
MASTERBATH #1
MASTER
SUITE #1
ENTRY
OP
E
N
T
O
AB
O
V
E
OPEN TO ABOVE
2-CAR GARAGE
(442 S.F.)
MASTER
SUITE #1
DINING RM.LIVING RM.
LAUNDRY
MASTER
BATH #1
PWDR.
RM.
KITCHEN CL
O
.
CLO.
150.14'
150.12'
62
.
0
0
'
62
.
0
0
'
1SCOPE OF WORK
SCALE: 1/8" = 1'-0"
SITE PLAN
CONCRETE
PAVEMENT
CONCRETE
PAVEMENT
CONCRETE
PAVEMENT
CONCRETE
PAVEMENT
2VICINITY MAP
REVISIONS
DATE NO
Date
Scale
Drawn
Job
Sheet
09-25-2024
SEE PLAN
2024-02
T-1
2-
U
N
I
T
C
O
N
D
O
M
I
N
I
U
M
21
4
G
E
N
O
A
S
T
.
,
AR
C
A
D
I
A
,
C
A
OPEN
SPACE
OPEN
SPACE
OPEN
SPACE
OPEN
SPACE
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
Attachment No. 5
Attachment No. 5
Arborist Report
46
Prepared for:
Robert Tong
August 8, 2024
Prepared by:
Javier Cabral Consulting Arborist
International Society of Arborists # WE- 8116A
1390 El Sereno Ave
Pasadena, California 91103
(626)818-8704
jctcabral@sbcglobal.net
Robert Tong 214 Genoa St. Arcadia, CA 91006 August 8, 2024
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 1
ISA Certified Arborist 31 Dec 2025
47
Summary & Background and Assignment --------------------------- pg. 3
Site conditions & Google Earth Image ------------------------------- pg. 4
List Inventory ------------------------------------------------------------ pg. 5
Site Plan With Trees---------------------------------------------------- pg. 6
Tree Pictures ------------------------------------------------------------- pg. 7 thru 11
Protection Guidelines --------------------------------------------------- pg. 12 thru 14
Certificate of performance --------------------------------------------- pg. 15
Arborist Signature Page ------------------------------------------------ Pg. 16
Robert Tong 214 Genoa St. Arcadia, CA 91006 August 8, 2024
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 2
48
Mr. Tong,
You have retained my consulting arborist services to provide a tree inventory and protection plan for the
property described as 214 Genoa St Arcadia, CA 91006. You are in the planning process of demolishing the
existing single-family home and redeveloping the property with a new two story-single-family home.
There is one protected Coast live Oak tree and two unprotected trees on-site. One protected Coast live oak tree
and one unprotected off-site trees will be inventoried and protected due to their proximity to the property line. All
protected trees are expected to survive in their existing condition.
Ms. Tong has requested that I provide the following arboricultural services.
1) Identify all trees on the property and label them on the architectural drawings as provided to the
arborist by Mr. Robert Tong.
2) Evaluate the current health of any protected trees.
3) Provide a tree protection plan that will help ensure the short- and long-term health of the trees
that will remain during and after construction activities are completed.
The following report is based on my site visit on August 3, 2024, and my analysis of the trees, site plan,
and surrounding landscape. For the purpose of this report, I will address these trees as Trees (# 1 thru
5).
Robert Tong 214 Genoa St. Arcadia, CA 91006 August 8, 2024
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 3
49
A one-story single-family home currently exists on this property located 214 Genoa St Arcadia, CA 91006.
1) There are (3) total trees on this lot of which one qualifies for protection from the City of Arcadia Tree
Protection Ordinance. Two off-site tree will be inventoried and protected.
Google Earth Image
Robert Tong 214 Genoa St. Arcadia, CA 91006 August 8, 2024
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 4
50
A) - Healthy, vigorous tree, reasonably free of disease, with good structure and form typical of the species.
B)- A tree with slight decline in vigor, small amount of twig dieback, minor structural defects that could be corrected.
C) - A tree with moderate vigor, moderate twig and small branch dieback, thinning crown, poor leaf color, moderate
structural defects that might be mitigated.
D) A tree in decline, epicormics growth, extensive dieback of medium to large branches, significant structural defects that
cannot be abated.
F) A tree in severe decline, dieback of scaffold branches and or trunk, mostly epicormics growth, extensive structural
defects that cannot be abated.
List Inventory pg. 1
Robert Tong 214 Genoa St. Arcadia, CA 91006 August 8, 2024
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 5
51
Site Plan With Trees (cropped)
Robert Tong 214 Genoa St. Arcadia, CA 91006 August 8, 2024
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 6
52
Tree # 1 (facing southwest)
Robert Tong 214 Genoa St. Arcadia, CA 91006 August 8, 2024
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 7
Tree # 1
53
Tree # 2 (facing west)
Robert Tong 214 Genoa St. Arcadia, CA 91006 August 8, 2024
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 8
Tree # 2
54
Tree # 3 OFF-SITE (facing southeast)
Robert Tong 214 Genoa St. Arcadia, CA 91006 August 8, 2024
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 9
Tree #3
55
Tree # 4 (facing south)
Robert Tong 214 Genoa St. Arcadia, CA 91006 August 8, 2024
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 10
Tree # 4
56
Tree # 5 Off-Site (facing east)
Robert Tong 214 Genoa St. Arcadia, CA 91006 August 8, 2024
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 11
Tree # 5
57
1) Avoid damaging the roots, stem, and branches with mechanical and manual equipment. No roots shall be
vered with a
sharp tool such as a hand saw or manual pruners.
2) Avoid soil compaction by prohibiting the use of heavy equipment such as backhoes and bobcats under the
tree drip line. If access within the TPZ is required during the construction process, the route shall be covered
in a 6 inch layer of mulch in the TPZ and the area shall be aerated and fertilized at the conclusion of
construction.
3) Do not store or park tools, equipment, vehicles, or chemicals under the tree drip line. No equipment or
debris of any kind shall be placed within the TPZ. No fuel, paint, solvent oil, thinner, asphalt, cement, grout,
or any other construction chemical shall be stored or allowed in any manner to enter within the TPZ.
4) Avoid washing of equipment and tools such as wheel barrels, shovels, and mechanical motors under the tree
drip line.
5) Prevent flooding and pooling of service water under the drip line. Grade changes that will flood the TPZ are
prohibited unless a drainage plan is implemented. No grade changes within the TPZ shall be allowed.
6) Avoid cutting tree roots whenever possible. This can sometimes be accomplished by bridging roots,
tunneling, or radial trenching. If roots must be cut use a sharp tool that will make a clean flush cut and not tear
the roots. If possible, all digging under the tree drip line should be done manually to avoid tearing out of
roots. Roots outside of the TPZ may be cleanly severed vertically with a sharp garden tool.
7) Do not raise or lower the grade within the tree protection zone of any protected trees unless approved by the
project arborist. Roots greater than 1 inch in diameter that are exposed or damaged shall be cut with a sharp
tool such as a hand saw, pruners, or loppers and covered with soil in conformance to industry standards. If
any work is required within the TPZ the Arborist shall be consulted previous to beginning. The Arborist shall
be contacted as soon as possible to arrange for a timely inspection and prevent delays.
Robert Tong 214 Genoa St. Arcadia, CA 91006 August 8, 2024
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 12
58
8) Place a protective barrier or temporary fencing as directed by the consulting arborist in the diagram below.
The protection fencing shall be in place before demolition begins and shall only be removed or reduced
when all heavy equipment such as back-hoes, bobcats, loaders, and other heavy equipment with tires
and tracks will not be required. Fencing can be adjusted, or sections reduced or removed as the project
advances into the landscaping phases of the project. The consulting arborist shall be contacted if there are
doubts about the placement or removal of fencing.
9) Landscape preparation & excavation within the TPZ shall be limited to the use of hand tools and small
hand-held power tools and shall not be of a depth that could cause root damage. No attachments or wires
other than those of a protective or non-damaging method shall be attached to a protected tree.
10) Construction personnel should be briefed on the importance of the guidelines before construction begins
and reminded of it during tailgate meetings and as necessary. A printed copy should be posted where
employees can be reminded of it.
11) All protected trees shall be watered before, during, and after construction as needed to prevent drought
stress and tree death until sprinklers have been installed and are functional.
Robert Tong 214 Genoa St. Arcadia, CA 91006 August 8, 2024
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 13
59
Site Plan With Protection Fencing
Robert Tong 214 Genoa St. Arcadia, CA 91006 August 8, 2024
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 14
60
Robert Tong 214 Genoa St. Arcadia, CA 91006 August 8, 2024
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 15
61
I Javier Cabral certify the following:
No warranty is made, expressed or implied, that problems or deficiencies of the trees or the property
will not occur in the future, from any cause. The Arborist shall not be responsible for damages or
injuries caused by any tree defects and assume no responsibility for the correction of defects or tree
related problems. The Arborist assumes no responsibility for damage to trees as a result of the
construction activities as the Arborist cannot be present at all times to witness all construction tasks
near the subject trees.
The owner and client of the trees may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the
Arborist or seek additional advice if the owner decides not to accept the Arborists findings or
recommendations.
The Arborist has no past, present or future interest in the removal or preservation of any tree. The
opinions contained in the Arborist report are independent and objective judgements of the Arborist.
The findings, opinions, and recommendations of the Arborist are based on based on the physical
inspection of said property. The opinions are based on knowledge, experience, and education.
The Arborist shall not be required to provide testimony, provide site monitoring, provide further
documentation for changes beyond the control of the Arborist, be deposed, or to attend any meeting
without contractual arrangements for additional fees to the Arborist.
The Arborist assumes no responsibility for verification of ownership or location of property lines, or
for any recommendations based on inaccurate information.
This Arborist report may not be reproduced without the expressed written permission of the Arborist
and the client to whom the report was provided to. Any changes or alteration of this report invalidates
the entire report.
Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training and experience to
examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees, make
recommendations to prevent or minimize damage to trees during and after construction projects, and
attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. Clients may choose to accept or disregard the
recommendations of the arborist, or to seek additional advice.
Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree.
Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often
hidden within trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or
safe under all circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise, remedial treatments, like
any medicine, cannot be guaranteed.
Treatment, pruning and removal of trees may involve considerations beyond the scope of the
neighbors, and other issues. Arborists cannot take such considerations into account unless
complete and accurate information is disclosed to the arborist. An arborist should then be
expected to reasonably rely upon the completeness and accuracy of the information provided.
Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree
of risk. The only way to eliminate all risk associated with trees is to eliminate all trees.
Robert Tong 214 Genoa St. Arcadia, CA 91006 August 8, 2024
Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 16
62
Attachment No. 6
Attachment No. 6
Preliminary Exemption Assessment
63
Preliminary Exemption Assessment
1.Name or description of
project:
Multiple Family Architectural Design Review No. MFADR 24-03,
Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 24-01 (84605) and Protected Tree
Encroachment No. TRE 24-14 - A tentative parcel map and design
review for a two-unit residential condominium development with a
Categorical Exemption under the California Environmental Quality
2.Project Location 214 Genoa Street (between 2nd and 3rd Avenue)
3.Entity or person undertaking
project:
A.
B.Other (Private)
(1)Name Sanyao Design Group Inc.
(2)Address 255 E. Santa Clara St. #200
Arcadia, CA 91006
4.Staff Determination:
preliminary review of this project in
accordance with the Lead Agency's "Local Guidelines for Implementing the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)" has concluded that this project does not require further
environmental assessment because:
a.The proposed action does not constitute a project under CEQA.
b.The project is a Ministerial Project.
c.The project is an Emergency Project.
d.The project constitutes a feasibility or planning study.
e.The project is categorically exempt.
Applicable Exemption Class: 15332 Class 32 (Infill Development)
f.The project is statutorily exempt.
Applicable Exemption:
g.The project is otherwise
exempt on the following
basis:
h.The project involves another public agency which constitutes the Lead Agency.
Name of Lead Agency:
Date: October 26, 2024 Staff: Gary Yesayan, Associate Planner
64
ARCADIA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 26, 2024
Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda will be made
available for public inspection in the City’s Planning Services Office located at 240 W. Huntington Drive, Arcadia, California,
during normal business hours.
CALL TO ORDER Chair Wilander called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Chair Wilander, Vice Chair Tallerico, Commissioners Arvizu, Hui, and Tsoi
ABSENT: None
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM STAFF REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS
There were none.
PUBLIC COMMENTS (5 minute time limit per person)
There were none.
PUBLIC HEARING
1. Resolution No. 2161– A General Plan Amendment to update the Safety Element and adopt a
new Environmental Justice Element
CEQA: Negative Declaration
Recommendation: Recommend Approval to the City Council
Applicant: City of Arcadia – Development Services
MOTION - PUBLIC HEARING
Chair Wilander introduced the item and Planning Services Manager Fiona Graham presented the
staff report and informed the Commission that Henry Eckhold from Dudek, who helped prepare
the Elements was present, as well as Battalion Chief Devlin from the City’s Fire Department.
Commissioner Tsoi asked if the Safety Element was an existing Element in the General Plan.
Ms. Graham confirmed that it was.
Commissioner Tsoi asked if the Environmental Justice Element was a new element.
Ms. Graham stated that it was a new element required by State law when two or more Elements
are updated.
Commissioner Arvizu asked if the repairs at Wilderness Park will be completed by the end of
2024.
Ms. Graham stated that six (6) weeks prior to the meeting, she confirmed with the County of Los
Angeles that they were on track for completion. She added that she would reach out again before
the City Council meeting to request an update.
65
2 11/26/2024
Commissioner Arvizu referred to the map that showed all the hazardous materials on page 58 of
the agenda packet and asked why only one out of 11 large generators were shown on the map
(Figure S-9).
Henry Eckhold realized the map was not up to date, but it will be updated.
Commissioner Arvizu asked if the reference “horse racetrack” meant the Santa Anita Park.
Ms. Graham confirmed that it was referring to Santa Anita Park.
Commissioner Arvizu suggested that the map should be updated to also include that one of the
hazardous material generators is located at Santa Anita Park.
Mr. Eckhold said that the map will be updated to also include that information.
Commissioner Arvizu asked about the four (4) leaking underground storage tanks indicated on
Figure S-9 and what was being done to fix the problem.
Ms. Fiona stated that she would look into the matter, and the text and map will be updated.
Vice Chair Tallerico informed Commissioner Arvizu that there was more information about the
leaking underground storage tanks further down in the second paragraph.
Commissioner Arvizu referred to the “Fire Prevention and Emergency Services Programs” on
page 65 and felt the membership fees should be listed.
Ms. Graham explained that we normally do not include the fees since the fees are updated on a
regular basis and this Safety Element would not be updated for another eight years and we do
not want the information to be outdated soon after it is adopted.
Commissioner Arvizu referred to page 69 and asked if the language “volunteer programs” can
include what those programs are for public information.
Ms. Graham said she took note of the issue and would look into it.
Commissioner Arvizu referred to page 70 and asked if the training facility had been built.
Deputy Development Services Director Lisa Flores informed him that it had not been built.
Commissioner Arvizu referred to page 74 and the last sentence of the first paragraph after the
chart and asked if the word “informed” was meant to be used or if it was an error.
Mr. Eckhold informed him that “informed” was the correct word.
Commissioner Arvizu referred to page 99 and questioned the rationale behind the proposal to
replace natural turf with synthetic turf in the City parks.
Mr. Eckhold explained that this was one of the residents’ priorities identified through feedback
gathered during a community outreach meeting held in 2017 for the Parks and Recreation Master
Plan.
66
3 11/26/2024
Commissioner Arvizu referenced the Home Rehabilitation Program on page 126 and pointed out
that both words, loan and grant, are used throughout. Furthermore, he asked how the program is
funded and if loan and grant are the same thing.
Assistant City Manager and Development Services Director Jason Kruckeberg said that the Home
Rehabilitation Program is a grant program for eligible residents who wish to make home
improvements, and it is funded by the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG). However,
if the property owner sells the house and moves within 3-5 years, the grant funds must be paid
back to the City.
Commissioner Arvizu asked if the use of the term “grant” or “loan” should be consistent within this
section.
Mr. Kruckeberg agreed that the terminology should be consistent.
Commissioner Arvizu referenced Section 5-10 of the Implementation Plan on page 131, which
addresses second dwelling units, and inquired whether the State permits the City to amend the
General Plan to eliminate covenants and authorize accessory living units.
Ms. Graham stated that the State had eliminated certain requirements, such as the need for a
covenant on Accessory Dwelling Units, prompting the City to amend the Development Code.
Assistant City Attorney, Kellan Martz further stated that the Development Code will be updated to
bring the regulations into compliance with State laws.
Commissioner Arvizu referred to page 132 and asked if transitional housing is a State
requirement.
Mr. Martz confirmed it is a State and Federal requirement.
Commissioner Hui inquired about e-waste and suggested increasing public outreach efforts to
educate residents, particularly those who do not speak English.
Ms. Flores explained that Development Services Department does not manage e-waste. She
added that the education programs mentioned in these Elements are designed to inform residents
about protecting themselves during weather-related or natural disaster emergencies.
Commissioner Hui asked if the educational information could be included in the City’s calendar.
Ms. Graham stated that the Planning Services Division did not oversee the City’s calendar but
that she would pass her suggestion along to the City Manager’s Office.
Commissioner Arvizu asked how many residents attended the virtual Environmental Justice
Element community meeting that took place on October 11, 2023.
Ms. Flores informed the Commission that about four (4) residents attended that meeting.
The public hearing was opened.
No one else spoke in favor of the proposal.
67
4 11/26/2024
No one spoke in opposition to the proposal.
Vice Chair Tallerico made a motion to close the public hearing. Commissioner Tsoi seconded the
motion.
Without objection, the motion was approved.
DISCUSSION
Vice Chair Tallerico stated that he did not have any questions because they had already been
answered by Ms. Flores prior to the meeting. He also had no further comments.
Chair Wilander said the staff report was very informative and that she learned a lot from it. Ms.
Wilander also thanked staff and the consultant for their hard work putting together the staff report
and the environmental documents.
MOTION
It was moved by Vice Chair Tallerico, seconded by Commissioner Hui to adopt Resolution No.
2161 recommending City Council approval of a General Plan Amendment to update the Safety
Element and adopt a new Environmental Declaration
ROLL CALL
AYES: Chair Wilander, Vice Chair Tallerico, Commissioners Arvizu, Hui, and Tsoi
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
The motion was approved.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes of the November 12, 2024, Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission
Recommendation: Approve
Vice Chair Tallerico motioned to approve the minutes and seconded by Commissioner Hui.
ROLL CALL
AYES: Chair Wilander, Vice Chair Tallerico, Commissioners Arvizu, and Hui
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Tsoi
Commissioner Tsoi abstained since he was not present at the November 12, 2024,
meeting.
The motion was approved.
68
5 11/26/2024
MATTERS FROM CITY COUNCIL LIAISON
City Council Member Wang had nothing to report.
MATTERS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSONERS
Vice Chair Tallerico thanked staff for their work on the Safety Element Update and Environmental Justice
Element.
Commissioner Arvizu agreed with Vice Chair Tallerico and said he learned a lot from the documents.
Commissioner Tsoi concurred with the Commission and said that the report was very informative. Mr.
Tsoi added that this information was important for residents to be aware of.
MATTERS FROM ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
Mr. Martz had nothing to report.
MATTERS FROM STAFF INCLUDING UPCOMING AGENDA ITEMS
Ms. Flores reported that there will be one item on the December 10 agenda.
Ms. Flores informed the Commission that a labor union appealed the Planning Commission’s decision of
the Hilton Tempo Hotel and it will be before the City Council in January.
ADJOURNMENT
The Planning Commission adjourned the meeting at 7:42 p.m., to Tuesday, December 10, 2024, at 7:00
p.m. in the City Council Chamber.
Chair Wilander, Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Lisa L. Flores
Secretary, Planning Commission
69