HomeMy WebLinkAbout7649RESOLUTION NO. 7649
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA,
CALIFORNIA, TO FORMALLY CENSURE MAYOR SHARON KWAN
WHEREAS, a censure is formal resolution of a City Council or other governing
body, reprimanding a person, normally one of its own members, for specified
conduct; and
WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court, in the case of Houston
Community College System v. Wilson (2022) 595 U.S. 468, held that a censure is a
form of constitutionally -protected speech that a deliberative body may lawfully
utilize to reprimand the conduct of one of its members; and
WHEREAS, the City Council expects all its members, including the Mayor, to
treat colleagues, staff, and the public with respect and civility; base public statements
on facts and reasonably accurate and accessible information; abide by the
requirements of the Brown Act and the City's rules of procedure; work collaboratively
and in good faith with staff and Council colleagues; and uphold the dignity of the
office to which they were elected; and
WHEREAS, the powers of the City Council are in part as delineated by the City
Charter, which provides at Section 405 that all powers of the City shall be vested in
the Council except as otherwise provided in the City Charter; and
1
WHEREAS, pursuant to said authority, and elsewhere under California law and
the City's governing documents, the City Council is empowered to discipline its
officers and members, including the act of censure, which may include discipline
which will constitute a disability under the City Charter; and
WHEREAS, Section 404 of the City Charter provides that the Mayor Pro
Tempore shall perform the duties of the Mayor during the Mayor's absence or
disability; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor has been provided with notice and with information
related to the alleged conduct giving rise to a formal censure; and
WHEREAS, at a special meeting held on August 26, 2025, the City Council
received information related to conduct attributable to the Mayor and provided the
opportunity to receive testimony and information to rebut the allegations; and
WHEREAS, based on the findings set forth in this Resolution and all
information in the record of the City Council's proceedings, the City Council
determines that a formal censure of the Mayor is appropriate.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA,
DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The City Council finds that the Recitals set forth above are true and
correct and incorporates the Recitals into its action.
2
SECTION 2. The City Council finds that, on information received during the
proceedings and all other relevant information, Mayor Kwan engaged in the conduct
set forth in Exhibit 'W', which is incorporated herein and which supports the City
Council's imposition of a formal censure.
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby formally censures Mayor Sharon Kwan as
a result of the conduct described above.
SECTION 4. As a consequence of this formal censure, the City Council imposes
the following actions while Mayor Kwan serves in the office of Mayor:
(i) Mayor Kwan is hereby relieved of her duties to conduct City Council
meetings, and shall not preside over City Council meetings for the
balance of her term as Mayor, and said act of being relieved of her
duties shall be deemed a disability of the Mayor; and
(ii) The Mayor is relieved of her assignments to serve on City Committees
and as the City's representative on outside agency boards, except where
such boards require that the City's representative be the Mayor as
mandated by law; and
(iii) Mayor Kwan shall not serve as the City's designated representative to
speak on behalf of the City Council at outside events or to outside
organizations where the City is to provide a designated representative,
however nothing provided herein shall disable the Mayor from any
3
public address which is pursuant to an invitation by the party or
organization specifically requesting Mayor Sharon Kwan to address that
party or organization. If an unspecified speaking engagement or
request is made to the City for a public address, then the Mayor Pro
Tempore shall act in place of the Mayor, as a result of the Mayor's
disability; and
(iv) Mayor Kwan shall continue to be identified in the official records of the
City as the Mayor for the balance of her current term.
SECTION 5. If any portion of this resolution is found to be invalid or
unenforceable, such provisions shall be deemed severed and the remainder of the
resolution shall remain in full force and effect.
SECTION 6. This Resolution is effective upon its adoption by the City Council.
SECTION 7. The City Clerk shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
SECTION 8. Enforcement of the consequences prescribed in Section 4., items
(i), (ii), (iii) of this Resolution, is hereby stayed. The stay shall be in place until a
Councilmember makes a request for the stay to be lifted, the matter is added to the
agenda of the next City Council meeting, and is approved by a simple majority of
the City Council. The stay may be lifted if Mayor Kwan's future conduct falls within
the scope of the findings listed in Exhibit "A" or is found to be inconsistent with the
CI
adopted rules of procedure and decorum specified in Resolution No. 7652, passed
and approved on September 2, 2025.
Passed, approved, and adopted this 2nd day of September, 2025.
ATTEST. -
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM*
Michael J. Maurer
City Attorney
5
Mayor of the City of Arcadia
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES) SS:
CITY OF ARCADIA )
I, LINDA RODRIGUEZ, City Clerk of the City of Arcadia, hereby certifies that the
foregoing Resolution No. 7649 was passed and adopted by the City Council of the City
of Arcadia, signed by the Mayor and attested to by the City Clerk at a regular meeting
of said Council held on the 2nd day of September, 2025 and that said Resolution was
adopted by the following vote, to wit:
AYES: Cao, Cheng, Fu, and Wang
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Kwan
RI
City Clerk of the City of Arcadia
EXHIBIT 'W'
FINDINGS AND SUPPORT FOR CENSURE
OF MAYOR SHARON KWAN
The following conduct supports the City Council's censure:
1. Weaponizing and exploiting children, induced to give false and
uninformed statements for political purposes of embarrassing the City, and
Councilmembers, and to escape responsibility through the use of shills and
strawmen. Use of these planted audience members subverts the democratic
process, by taking valuable council and staff time, and cheapening public discourse,
which discourages public participation.
2. Demeaning the military service of veterans by stating she has done
more for veterans by asserting she made unsubstantiated charitable contributions,
and arguing that these were more valuable than respect and appreciation.
Additionally, Mayor Kwan bestowed a commendation on a high school student for
ten minutes of a City Council presentation for "bravery and courage," while at the
same meeting demeaning a ten-year Iraq and Afghanistan war veteran. This
disrespect for men and women in uniform, past and present, reflects negatively on
the City and is inapposite to the values of Arcadia and its public officials.
3. Knowingly falsely alleging financial impropriety by claiming there is
concealment of the City's true finances and asserting that City staff is
7
misrepresenting financial information to the City Council and public, and claims that
the City staff is lying to the public, for the political purpose of undermining public
confidence in City staff and the Mayor's colleagues. Additionally, the Mayor has made
patentlyfalse and baseless allegations that the City's finances are headed for disaster
by the City Council's conduct, or that reserves are being depleted, all without
evidence, and despite being corrected by City staff with statistical evidence and City
records. The Mayor has accused the City Manager and accounting staff of fraud and
accounting manipulation solely because due to her own lack of diligence, and failed
to obtain an accounting record which was repeatedly emailed to Mayor Kwan. Use
of these shadowy and baseless allegations only serves to undermine public respect
and trust for the City, its workers and representatives.
4. Disparaging first responders, and council colleagues by accusing them
of impropriety and corruption because labor organizations chose not to support her.
These unfair and baseless allegations contribute to loss of public trust in our law
enforcement and public safety agencies, and cause meaningless conflict based on
false statements made for political gain.
5. Making unfounded accusations of sexism against Councilmembers and
staff whenever disagreements arise to deflect argument against her ill-conceived and
unfounded positions on substantive issues. This conduct is a transparent attempt to
deflect responsibility for the Mayor's improvident statements.
6. Discouraging public participation by mocking and belittling
constituents, including elderly residents, by implying their incompetence and
deafness, simply because they were politically adversarial to her or expressed a
conflicting viewpoint, attempting to intimidate opposing viewpoints and to squelch
dissent.
7. Misusing council procedures and engaging in "ambush techniques" by
failing to place items on the Council agenda in order to surprise her fellow
Councilmembers and city staff and failing to consult department heads before
raising issues that could have been resolved administratively, for the purpose of
embarrassing unprepared City staff members and undermining public confidence in
these officials and staffers. The Mayor has also misstated historical Council records
to attempt to infer that the city staff and Council has been malfeasant.
8. Engaging in un-collegial behavior, unprofessional temperament, and
unfounded accusations against Councilmembers simply because other
Councilmembers expressed a differing viewpoint. This behavior subverts the public
decision -making process. By deflecting the argument and attempting to silence
dissent and statements of other Councilmembers to avoid being demonstrated
wrong, the Mayor seeks to use intimidation, strong arm tactics, and fearmongering
in place of reasoned decision making.
Q