HomeMy WebLinkAboutFindings and Action ReportRancho Santa Anita Property Owners’ Association
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-1-
Date: October 30, 2025 File No. 303
Project Address: 1100 W. Orange Grove Ave
Association Name: RSAPOA
Applicant Name: Benjamin Voong
Property Owner(s) Name: Benjamin Voong
Project Description: New home
FINDINGS
Only check those that are apply and provide a written explanation for each
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Site Planning Principles and
Neighborhood Context Guidelines.
Explanation: Proposed residence abides by the Design Guidelines.
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Forms and Mass Guidelines.
Explanation: New proposed residence is consistent with guidelines.
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Frontage Conditions
Guidelines.
Explanation: New residence abides by required setbacks and frontage
Recommendations.
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Garages and Driveways
Guidelines.
Explanation: Proposed garages and driveways conform with Design Guidelines
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Architectural Styles
Guidelines.
Explanation: Proposed residence doesn’t show a distinct architectural style.
Also, certain elements such as the “columns” seem incomplete (free-floating at the
top, not “terminated”).
Rancho Santa Anita Property Owners’ Association
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-2-
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Height, Bulk, and Scale
Guidelines.
Explanation: Proposed residence abides by the Design Guidelines
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Roofline Guidelines.
Explanation: Proposed residence abides by the Design Guidelines
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Entries Guidelines.
Explanation: New entry abides by the Design Guidelines
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Windows and Doors
Guidelines.
Explanation: Window in 2nd floor bedroom on east side overlooking neighbor will be
placed 6’ from floor (reducing overall window height by 1’).
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Articulation Guidelines.
Explanation: Proposed residence can provide better articulation, either through
architectural changes or through variegated material choices.
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Facade Details Guidelines.
Explanation: Certain elements such as the front façade “columns” seem incomplete
(free-floating at the top, not “terminated”).
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Colors and Materials
Guidelines.
Explanation: See comment under Articulation Guidelines question above.
Rancho Santa Anita Property Owners’ Association
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-3-
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Accessory Lighting
Guidelines.
Explanation: Proposed residence abides by the Design Guidelines
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Additions, Alterations, and
Accessory Buildings/Structures Guidelines.
Explanation: Pergola setback should be 5’
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Hillside Properties
Guidelines.
Explanation: Not applicable
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Fences, Walls, Gates, and
Hedges Guidelines.
Explanation: Owner will provide survey for palm tree that sits on the lot line adjoining
neighbor on east side.
The proposed project is, is not consistent with the Impervious Coverage and
Landscape Areas Guidelines.
Explanation: Proposed residence abides by the Design Guidelines
ACTION
Pursuant to City’s Development Code Section 9107.20.050, a Site Plan and Design Review in the
Homeowners Association Areas may be approved only if it is found that the proposed development
is consistent with the City’s adopted Design Guidelines.
APPROVED CONDITIONALLY APPROVED DENIED
Date of ARB Meeting: OCTOBER 30, 2025
ARB Members Rendering the Above Decision: Sanjay B. Kucheria (Chair),
Diana Nee (Vice Chair), Shahnawaz Ahmad, Sudheer Donthineni
AYES: 4
NOES: 0
ABSENT: 1
Rancho Santa Anita Property Owners’ Association
ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD
Findings and Action Report
-4-
Conditions of Approval:
Reason for Denial:
There is a ten (10) day appeal period for this application. To file an appeal, a completed
Appeal Application form must be submitted to the City’s Planning Division along with a
$728.00 appeal fee by 5 p.m. on May 26, 2025. You will be notified if an appeal is filed.
Approved designs shall expire in one year from the effective date unless plans are
submitted to Building Services for plan-check, a building permit is issued and the
construction is diligently pursued, a certificate of occupancy has been issued, or the
approval is renewed. The final plans must be consistent with the approved design concept
plans and any conditions of approval. Any inconsistency from the approved design
concept plans may preclude the issuance of a building permit.
An extension may be granted by the ARB or designee, or the Review Authority that
approved the project for a maximum period of one (1) year from the initial expiration date.
An extension can only be granted if the required findings can be made. Please note that
acceptance of an extension request does not indicate approval of an extension.
You may visit the City’s website at www.ArcadiaCA.gov/noticesanddecisions to view this
document. If you have any questions regarding the above decision, please contact the
ARB Chairperson at rsapoaarb@gmail.com / 818-389-9131. Thank you.
c: City of Arcadia, Planning Division