The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About5-26-26 Agenda PacketARCADIA PLANNINGCOMMISSION REGULAR MEETING AGENDA Tuesday, May 26, 2026, 7:00 PM Location: City Council Chambers, 240 W. Huntington Drive Pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons with a disability who require a disability related modification or accommodation in order to participate in a meeting, including auxiliary aids or services, may request such modification or accommodation from the City Clerk at (626) 574-5455. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to the meeting. ṩᦞǉ㖾ഭ↻䳌Ӫ⌅ṸǊˈ䴰㾱䈳ᮤᡆᨀ׋ׯ࡙䇮ᯭ᡽㜭৲࣐Պ䇞Ⲵ↻䳌Ӫ༛˄वᤜ䖵ࣙಘᶀᡆᴽ࣑˅ਟоᐲҖ䇠ᇈ࣎ޜᇔ㚄㌫˄⭥ 䈍˖(626) 574-5455˅Ǆ䈧൘Պࡽ 48 ሿᰦ䙊⸕ᐲҖ䇠ᇈ࣎ޜᇔˈԕׯ֌ࠪਸ⨶ᆹᧂˈ⺞؍亪࡙৲࣐Պ䇞Ǆ Pursuant to the City of Arcadia’s Language Access Services Policy, limited-English proficient speakers who require translation services in order to participate in a meeting may request the use of a volunteer or professional translator by contacting the City Clerk’s Office at (626) 574-5455 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting. ṩᦞ䱯ࠟ䘚ӊᐲⲴ䈝䀰ׯ࡙ᴽ࣑᭯ㆆˈ㤡䈝㜭࣋ᴹ䲀ᒦ䴰㾱㘫䈁ᴽ࣑᡽㜭৲࣐Պ䇞ⲴӪਟоᐲҖ䇠ᇈ࣎ޜᇔ㚄㌫˄⭥䈍˖(626) 574- 5455㸧ˈ䈧≲ᨀ׋ᘇᝯᡆуъ㘫䈁ᴽ࣑ˈ䈧㠣ቁ൘Պࡽ 72 ሿᰦᨀࠪ䈧≲Ǆ CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Domenico Tallerico, Chair Vincent Tsoi, Vice Chair David Arvizu, Commissioner Angela Hui, Commissioner Marilynne Wilander, Commissioner SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM STAFF REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS PUBLIC COMMENTS (5 minute time limit per person) (DFK VSHDNHU LV OLPLWHG WR ȴYH PLQXWHV SHU SHUVRQ XQOHVV ZDLYHG E\ WKH 3ODQQLQJ Commission. Under the Brown Act, the Commission or Board Members are prohibited from discussing or taking action on any item not listed on the posted agenda. PUBLIC HEARING All interested persons are invited to appear at a public hearing and to provide evidence or testimony concerning any of the proposed items set forth below for consideration. Separate and apart from the applicant (who may speak longer at the discretion of the Commission) 1 speakers shall be limited to ȴYHPLQXWHVSHUSHUVRQ. The applicant may additionally submit rebuttal comments, at the discretion of the Commission. You are hereby advised that should you desire to legally challenge in court or in an administrative proceeding any action taken by the City Council regarding any public hearing item, you may be limited to raising only those issues and objections you or someone else raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. 1. Resolution No. 2189 –Approving Planning Commission Administrative Modification No. PC AM 26-02 for a front setback modification, Healthy Protected Tree Removal Permit No. TRH 26-03 for the removal one Coast Live Oak, and Protected Tree Encroachment Permit No. TRE 26-06 for a new two-story single-family residence at 945 Singing Wood Drive CEQA: Categorically Exempt Recommendation: Adopt Applicant: Sanyao Design Group, Inc. There is a ten day appeal period. Appeals are to be filed by 4:30 p.m. on Friday, June 5, 2026. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and can be acted on by one roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless members of the Commission, staff, or the public request that specific items be removed from the Consent Calendar for separate discussion and action. 2. Minutes of the May 12, 2026, Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission Recommendation: Approve MATTERS FROM CITY COUNCIL LIAISON MATTERS FROM PLANNING COMMISSIONERS MATTERS FROM ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY MATTERS FROM STAFF INCLUDING UPCOMING AGENDA ITEMS ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission will adjourn this meeting to Tuesday, June 9, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. 2 Welcome to the Arcadia Planning Commission Meeting! The Planning Commission encourages public participation and invites you to share your views on City business. MEETINGS: Regular Meetings of the Planning Commission are held on the second and fourth Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. A full Planning Commission agenda packet with all backup information is available at City Hall, the Arcadia Public Library, and on the City’s website at www.ArcadiaCA.gov. Copies of individual Agenda Reports are available via email upon request (Planning@ArcadiaCA.gov). Documents distributed to a majority of the Planning Commission after the posting of this agenda will be DYDLODEOHIRUUHYLHZDWWKH3ODQQLQJ6HUYLFHV2ɝFHLQ&LW\+DOO:+XQWLQJWRQ'ULYH Arcadia, California. CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: Your participation is welcomed and invited at all Planning Commission meetings. Time is reserved at each regular meeting for those in the audience who wish to address the Planning Commission. The City requests that persons addressing the Planning Commission refrain from making personal, slanderous, profane, or disruptive remarks. When the Chair asks for those who wish to speak please come to the podium and state your name and address for the record. Please provide a copy of any written materials used in your address to the Planning Commission as well as a copy of any printed materials you wish to be distributed to the Planning Commission. MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA should be presented during the time designated as “PUBLIC COMMENTS.” In general, each speaker will be given (5) minutes to address the Planning Commission; however, the Chair, at his/her discretion, may shorten the speaking time limit to allow all speakers time to address the Planning Commission. By State law, the Planning Commission may not discuss or vote on items not on the agenda. The matter will automatically EHUHIHUUHGWRVWD΍IRUDSSURSULDWHDFWLRQRUUHVSRQVHRUZLOOEH placed on the agenda of a future meeting. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND APPEALS are items scheduled for which public input is either required or desired. Separate and apart from an applicant or appellant (who may speak longer at the discretion of the Planning Commission), speakers shall be limited to (5) minutes per person. The Chair, at his/her discretion, may shorten the speaking time limit to allow all speakers to address the Planning Commission. The applicant or appellant may also be D΍RUGHGDQDGGLWLRQDORSSRUWXQLW\IRUUHEXWWDOFRPPHQWV AGENDA ITEMS: The Agenda contains the regular order of business of the Planning Commission. Items on the Agenda have generally been reviewed and investigated by the City 3 6WD΍LQDGYDQFHRIWKHPHHWLQJVRWKDWWKH3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQFDQEHIXOO\LQIRUPHGDERXW a matter before making its decision. CONSENT CALENDAR: Items listed on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the Planning Commission and may be acted upon by one motion. There will be no separate GLVFXVVLRQRQWKHVHLWHPVXQOHVVDPHPEHURIWKH3ODQQLQJ&RPPLVVLRQ6WD΍RUWKHSXEOLF so requests. In this event, the item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and considered and acted on separately. DECORUM: While members of the public are free to level criticism of City policies and the action(s) or proposed action(s) of the Planning Commission or its members, members of the public may not engage in behavior that is disruptive to the orderly conduct of the proceedings, including, but not limited to, conduct that prevents other members of the audience from being heard when it is their opportunity to speak, or which prevents members of the audience from hearing or seeing the proceedings. Members of the public may not threaten any person with physical harm or act in a manner that may reasonably be interpreted as an imminent threat of physical harm. All persons attending the meeting are expected to adhere to the City’s policy barring harassment based upon a person’s race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, gender, sexual orientation, or age. The Chief of Police, or such member or members of the Police Department, may serve as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Planning Commission meeting. The Sergeant-at-Arms shall carry out all orders and instructions given by the SUHVLGLQJRɝFLDOIRUWKHSXUSRVHRIPDLQWDLQLQJRUGHUDQGGHFRUXPDWWKHPHHWLQJ$Q\ person who violates the order and decorum of the meeting may be placed under arrest and such person may be prosecuted under the provisions of Penal Code Section 403 or applicable Arcadia Municipal Code section. 4 ⅒⅒䗾ᶕࡠ䱯঑䘚ӊ㿴ࡂငઈՊՊ䇞ʽ 㿴ࡂငઈՊ啃࣡ޜՇ৲оᒦ䈊䚰ᛘ࠶ӛሩᐲ᭯ъ࣑Ⲵⴻ⌅Ǆ Պ䇞˖㿴ࡂငઈՊⲴֻՊҾ⇿ᴸⲴㅜҼњ৺ㅜഋњᱏᵏҼлॸгᰦ൘ᐲ䇞ՊՊ䇞঵Ѯ㹼Ǆਟ൘ᐲ᭯঵ǃ䱯঑ 䘚ӊޜޡമҖ侶(Arcadia Public Library)઼ᐲ᭯㖁ㄉ(www.ArcadiaCA.gov)кḕ䰵वਜ਼ᡰᴹ༷ԭؑ᚟Ⲵᆼᮤ Ⲵ㿴ࡂငઈՊ䇞〻वǄњӪ䇞〻ᣕ੺Ⲵ࢟ᵜਟ䙊䗷⭥ᆀ䛞ԦⲴᯩᔿ(Planning@ArcadiaCA.gov)㍒ਆǄᵜ䇞〻 ਁᐳਾˈ࠶ਁ㠣བྷཊᮠ㿴ࡂငઈՊⲴ᮷Ԧਟ൘㿴ࡂᴽ࣑࣎ޜᇔ(ൠ൰˖City Hall, 240 W. Huntington Drive, Arcadia, California) ḕ䰵Ǆ ޜ≁৲о˖⅒䗾ᒦ䚰䈧ᛘ৲࣐㿴ࡂငઈՊⲴᡰᴹՊ䇞Ǆ⇿⅑ֻՊ䜭Ѫᐼᵋੁ㿴ࡂငઈՊਁ㺘᜿㿱ⲴੜՇ亴⮉ ᰦ䰤Ǆᵜᐲ᭯㾱≲ੁ㿴ࡂငઈՊਁ㺘᜿㿱ⲴњӪнᗇਁ㺘Ӫ䓛᭫ࠫǃ䈭䉔ǃӥ␾ᡆ⹤ൿᙗ䀰䇪ǄᖃѫᤱӪ䚰䈧ᜣ㾱ਁ䀰ѻӪкਠਁ䀰ᰦˈ䈧䈤ࠪ㠚ᐡⲴဃ਽઼ൠ൰ˈԕׯ䇠ᖅǄ䈧ੁ㿴ࡂငઈՊᨀ׋ᛘᡰ൘ൠ൰ᡰ֯⭘ ⲴԫօҖ䶒ᶀᯉⲴ࢟ᵜˈԕ৺ᛘᐼᵋ࠶ਁ㔉㿴ࡂငઈՊⲴԫօঠࡧᶀᯉⲴ࢟ᵜǄ ᵚࡇޕᰕ〻Ⲵһ亩ᓄ൘ĀޜՇᖱ≲᜿㿱āᡰᤷᇊⲴᰦ䰤ᨀࠪǄа㡜㘼䀰ˈ⇿սਁ䀰㘵䜭ሶ㧧ᗇ(5)࠶䫏Ⲵᰦ 䰤ᶕੁ㿴ࡂငઈՊ㺘䗮㠚ᐡⲴ᜿㿱˗նᱟѫᤱӪਟԕ䝼ᛵ㕙⸝ਁ䀰ᰦ䰤ˈԕׯਟԕ䇙ᡰᴹਁ䀰㘵䜭ਟԕੁ㿴 ࡂငઈՊ㺘䗮㠚ᐡⲴᜣ⌅Ǆṩṩᦞᐎ⌅ᖻˈ㿴ࡂငઈՊнᗇ䇘䇪ᡆቡ䇞〻ཆһ亩䘋㹼ᣅ⾘Ǆ↔һ亩ሶ㠚ࣘᨀӔ 㠣ᐕ֌Ӫઈ䟷ਆ䘲ᖃൠ㹼ࣘᡆഎᓄˈᡆሶࡇޕӺਾՊ䇞Ⲵ䇞〻Ǆ ޜՇੜ䇱Պᡆк䇹ᱟ䴰㾱ᡆᐼᵋޜՇਁ㺘᜿㿱Ⲵ䇑ࡂ亩ⴞǄ䲔Ҷ⭣䈧Ӫᡆк䇹Ӫ˄㿴ࡂငઈՊਟ䝼ᛵᔦ䮯ަ ਁ䀰ᰦ䰤˅ཆˈ⇿սਁ䀰㘵Ⲵਁ䀰ᰦ䰤нᗇ䎵䗷(5)࠶䫏Ǆᐲ䮯ਟԕ䝼ᛵ㕙⸝ਁ䀰ᰦ䰤ˈ⺞؍ᡰᴹਁ䀰㘵䜭 ਟԕੁᐲ䇞Պ㺘䗮᜿㿱Ǆ⭣䈧Ӫᡆк䇹Ӫҏਟ㧧ᗇ仍ཆⲴ৽傣᜿㿱ᵪՊǄ 䇞〻һ亩˖䈕䇞〻वᤜ㿴ࡂငઈՊⲴ↓ᑨ䇞һᰕ〻Ǆᐲ᭯ᐕ֌Ӫઈа㡜Պ൘Պ䇞ࡽᇑḕ઼䈳ḕ䇞〻޵һ亩ˈ ԕׯ㿴ࡂငઈՊ൘֌ࠪߣᇊࡽݵ࠶Ҷ䀓ᴹޣһ亩Ǆ 㧧߶ᰕশ˖Ā㧧߶ᰕশāкᡰࡇһ亩㻛㿴ࡂငઈՊ㿶Ѫֻ㹼ޜһˈਟ䙊䗷а亩ࣘ䇞䟷ਆ㹼ࣘǄ䲔䶎㿴ࡂငઈ Պᡀઈǃᐕ֌ӪઈᡆޜՇ㾱≲ˈ੖ࡉнՊঅ⤜䇘䇪䘉Ӌһ亩Ǆ㤕ࠪ⧠䘉аᛵߥˈࡉ䈕һ亩ሶӾĀ㧧߶ᰕশā ѝࡐ䲔ˈᒦሩަ䘋㹼অ⤜ᇑ䇞઼㹼ࣘǄ ⽬㢲˖㲭❦ޜՇਟԕ㠚⭡ൠᢩ䇴෾ᐲ᭯ㆆԕ৺㿴ࡂငઈՊᡆަᡀઈⲴ㹼ࣘᡆᤏ䇞Ⲵ㹼ࣘˈնޜՇнᗇ䟷ਆ⹤ ൿ䇹䇬ᴹᒿ䘋㹼Ⲵ㹼Ѫˈवᤜնн䲀Ҿ䱫→ަԆੜՇ൘ᴹᵪՊਁ䀰ᰦਁ㺘᜿㿱Ⲵ㹼Ѫˈᡆ䱫→ੜՇੜࡠᡆⴻ ࡠ䇹䇬䘋〻ǄޜՇнᗇԕӪ䓛Քᇣေ㛱ԫօӪˈᡆԕਟਸ⨶ൠ䀓䟺Ѫ䘛൘ⴹ⶛ⲴӪ䓛Քᇣေ㛱Ⲵᯩᔿ㹼һǄ ᡰᴹ৲࣐Պ䇞ⲴӪ䜭ᓄ䚥ᆸᵜᐲⲴ᭯ㆆˈ⾱→สҾњӪⲴ⿽᯿ǃᇇᮉؑԠǃ㛔㢢ǃഭ㉽ǃ㹰㔏ǃ䓛փ↻⯮ǃ ५⯇⣦ߥǃႊါ⣦ߥǃᙗ࡛ǃᙗਆੁᡆᒤ喴㘼䘋㹼僊ᢠǄ䆖࣑༴༴䮯ᡆ䆖࣑༴Ⲵ↔㊫ᡀઈਟᣵԫ㿴ࡂငઈՊ Պ䇞Ⲵ䆖ছᇈǄ䆖ছᇈᓄᢗ㹼ѫᤱՊ䇞ⲴᇈઈѪ㔤ᤱՊ䇞〙ᒿ઼⽬Ԛ㘼ਁࠪⲴᡰᴹભԔ઼ᤷ⽪Ǆԫօ䘍৽Պ 䇞〙ᒿ઼⽬ԚⲴӪ൷ਟ㻛䙞ᦅˈᒦਟṩᦞǉࡁ⌅ިǊㅜᶑᡆ䘲⭘Ⲵǉ䱯঑䘚ӊᐲ᭯⌅ިǊ⴨ޣ䜘࠶Ⲵ㿴ᇊ ሩަᨀ䎧䇹䇬Ǆ 5 STAFF REPORT DEVELOPMENT SERVICESDEPARTMENT DATE: May 26, 2026 TO:Honorable Chairperson and Planning Commission FROM:Lisa L. Flores, Development Services Director Fiona Graham, Planning Services Manager By: Melissa Chipres, Senior Planner SUBJECT:RESOLUTION NO. 2189 – APPROVING PLANNING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION NO. PC AM 26-02 FOR A FRONT SETBACK MODIFICATION, HEALTHY PROTECTED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT NO. TRH 26-03 FOR THE REMOVAL OF ONE COAST LIVE OAK, AND PROTECTED TREE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. TRE 26-06 FOR A NEW TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 945 SINGING WOOD DRIVE CEQA: Categorically Exempt Recommendation: Adopt SUMMARY The Applicant, Sanyao Design Group, Inc., on behalf of the property owner, Ken Liu, is requesting approval of Planning Commission Administrative Modification No. PC AM 26-02, Healthy Protected Tree Removal Permit No. TRH 26-03, and Protected Tree Encroachment Permit No. TRE 26-06 for the construction of a new single-family residence with a front setback modification and removal of one protected Coast Live Oak (“Project”) located at 945 Singing Wood Drive within the Rancho Santa Anita Homeowners Association area (“Upper Rancho”). The proposed modification is for a front yard setback of approximately 120’-0” instead of the required front yard setback of 151’-6”. The proposed Project was reviewed by the Upper Rancho Architectural Review Board (ARB) at a public hearing on March 18, 2026 and was approved 4-1 with one board member absent. 6 Resolution No. 2189 – 945 Singing Wood Drive May 26, 2026 Page 2 of 11 It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2189 (Attachment No. 1), find the Project Categorically Exempt under CEQA, and approve Planning Commission Administrative Modification No. PC AM 26-02, Healthy Protected Tree Removal Permit No. TRH 26-03, and Protected Tree Encroachment Permit No. TRE 26-06, subject to the conditions listed in this staff report. BACKGROUND The subject property is a 1.4-acre interior lot located at 945 Singing Wood Drive within the Upper Rancho neighborhood. The site is currently developed with a 4,173 square foot one-story single-family residence, detached accessory structures, swimming pool, circular driveway, and extensive landscaping. The property contains numerous mature trees throughout that contribute to the established wooded character of the neighborhood. The existing residence was originally constructed in 1957 in the Contemporary Ranch architectural style. As part of the demolition review process for the Project, a Historic Resource Evaluation was prepared for the property. Based on the evaluation the property does not meet any of the minimum requirements for recognition as a historical resource nor is it eligible for listing on the California Register or as a local landmark. The existing home is not a unique example of a particular architectural style and is not representative of or associated with any important historical events or people. The structures have not yet been demolished due to the City’s replacement policy for residential projects, which requires approval of a new project prior to demolition of the structures on site. As the property is located within the Upper Rancho neighborhood, the Rancho Santa Anita Homeowners Association Architectural Review Board (ARB) reviewed the proposal at a public hearing on March 18, 2026 and approved the Project 4-1, with one board member absent. No comments were received from the community prior to or at the public hearing. The Upper Rancho ARB found the Project to be consistent with the Single Family Residential Design Guidelines, including site planning, massing, architectural style, landscaping, and frontage conditions (refer to Attachment No. 3 for the ARB Finding and Actions Form and March 18, 2026 meeting minutes). The ARB also noted that the Project included a front setback modification and healthy tree removal and expressed support for the subsequent, required applications. 7 Resolution No. 2189 – 945 Singing Wood Drive May 26, 2026 Page 3 of 11 PROPOSAL The Applicant is proposing to demolish the existing residence and redevelop the property with a new two-story Mediterranean style single-family residence with two (2) attached two-car garages, a basement, swimming pool, pool house/cabana, and associated site improvements. The Mediterranean style residence includes approximately 7,719 square feet of living space on the first floor, 5,831 square feet on the second floor, and a 4,300 square foot basement. See Figure 1- Proposed Site plan. To accommodate the Project, maintain a deeper and more functional rear yard, and to preserve or reduce impacts on mature trees, a front yard setback modification is proposed. The required front yard setback for the property is based on the average setback of the adjacent properties, which is 151’-6”. The proposed residence has a front setback of 120’-0”. All other setbacks exceed the minimum required in the Upper Rancho neighborhood. As part of the site landscaping, one protected Coast Live Oak tree is to be removed to accommodate a new pool. All other protected trees are to be maintained on the property and incorporated into the new landscaping plan. Figure 1 –Proposed Site Plan 8 Resolution No. 2189 – 945 Singing Wood Drive May 26, 2026 Page 4 of 11 ANALYSIS Front Setback Modification The Project includes a front setback of 120 feet, resulting in a reduction of 31 feet from the required setback. The required front setback for the subject property is 50 feet or the average of the front setbacks of the adjacent properties, whichever is the greater. As the neighboring properties located at 935 Singing Wood Drive and 975 Singing Wood Drive have front setbacks of approximately 119’-1” and 184’-2”, respectively, with an average of approximately 151’-6”, the average is the applicable front setback for the Project. Refer to Figure 2, below, for a comparison between the proposed and requested front setback. Figure 2 – Required and proposed front yard setback relative to the adjacent properties. The reduced front setback is appropriate as the Project will continue to maintain a substantial front setback that is generally consistent with the neighboring property at 935 Singing Wood Drive. Mostproperties in the surrounding area have significantly smaller front setbacks, making the unusually deep setbacks of the subject property and adjacent properties inconsistent with the established development pattern within the neighborhood. Newly constructed two-story residences in the vicinity have an average front setback of approximately 75’-9”, which is substantially less than the required 151’-6” setback applicable to the subject property and the proposed setback of 120’-0”. In addition, the existing residence on the property has a front setback of approximately 110 feet, which is less than the proposed setback for the new residence. 9 Resolution No. 2189 – 945 Singing Wood Drive May 26, 2026 Page 5 of 11 The front setback modification also allows for the home to be positioned further forward on the lot, away from the mature trees in the rear yard. The home’s position limits encroachment into the dripline of several protected trees and reduces the need to remove additional protected trees from within the property. The Upper Rancho ARB also found the Project and to be consistent with the neighborhood and approved the Project with the reduced front setback. Protected Trees An Arborist Report was prepared by Javier Cabral Consulting Arborist as part of the Project. A total of 50 trees were identified and evaluated within, and immediately adjacent to, the property, including 13 protected oak trees (refer to Attachment No. 5 for the Arborist Report). The Applicant is requesting to remove one protected Coast Live Oak tree to accommodate a new pool and associated rear yard improvements as part of the Project. The healthy Coast Live Oak to be removed has a trunk diameter of approximately 23 inches and has a “C” health rating. The proposed site design retains all other mature protected trees throughout the property, preserving the established wooded character of the site and surrounding Upper Rancho neighborhood. Several of the remaining protected trees will be encroached upon through the demolition and subsequent construction of the home, however protection measures will be used throughout to protect the trees in accordance with the recommendations of the Arborist. In accordance with the two-for-one protected tree replacement requirements in the Development Code, two (2) Coast Live Oak trees are required to be planted on the property (Refer to Condition of Approval No. 2). This requirement is consistent with the recommendation of the ARB which requested that the removed Coast Live Oak tree be replaced with two (2) new 24-inch box oak trees within the front yard area of the property. FINDINGS Section 9107.05.050 of the Arcadia Municipal Code requires that for an Administrative Modification to be granted, it is required that the Planning 10 Resolution No. 2189 – 945 Singing Wood Drive May 26, 2026 Page 6 of 11 Commission make at least one of the following findings in order to approve the subject modification request: 1. Promote uniformity of development; 2. Prevent an unreasonable hardship; or 3. Secure an appropriate improvement of a parcel The proposed front setback modification would promote uniformity of development and prevent an unreasonable hardship by allowing the proposed residence to have a 120-foot front yard setback in lieu of the required approximately 151’-6” setback. The required setback is based on the average front yard setbacks of the two adjacent properties located at 935 and 975 Singing Wood Drive, which have unusually deep front setbacks of approximately 119’-1” and 184’-2”, respectively. While front yard setbacks throughout the surrounding neighborhood vary, most residences have setbacks of less than 100 feet. The proposed 120-foot setback remains substantial in depth, exceeds the setback of the existing residence on the property, which is approximately 109’-4”, and is generally consistent with the adjacent residence at 935 Singing Wood Drive, thereby maintaining the established estate-style character of the neighborhood. Strict application of the required setback would push the proposed residence significantly farther toward the rear of the property, resulting in a disproportionately smaller and less functional rear yard area and an oversized front yard. The proposed front setback modification allows for a more balanced and functional site layout with deeper rear yard open space, recreational amenities, and reduced impacts to existing mature trees. Accordingly, the requested modification promotes uniformity of development and prevents an unreasonable hardship resulting from the application of an unusually deep front yard setback requirement. Healthy Protected Tree Removal The provided Arborist Report prepared by Javier Cabral Consulting Arborist identifies Tree No. 42 as a protected Coast Live Oak with a diameter of approximately 23 inches and a “C” health rating. The Arborist Report does not identify the tree as dead, diseased, or hazardous. The Arborist Report concludes that removal of Tree No. 42 is necessary due to its location in the middle of the property, which is within the footprint of the proposed pool and associated site improvements which form part of 11 Resolution No. 2189 – 945 Singing Wood Drive May 26, 2026 Page 7 of 11 the Project. The Project retains all other mature protected trees located throughout the site and incorporates tree protection measures intended to minimize impacts during demolition and construction activities. In compliance with the Development Code, the Applicant will be required to plant two (2) new 24-inch box Coast Live Oak trees on the property as a replacement of the removed Coast Live Oak tree. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT This Project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15303(a) and 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines pertaining to New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures and Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations. The Project qualifies for the Class 3 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15303(a) because it consists of the construction of one new detached single-family residence on an existing developed residential parcel surrounded by existing urban residential developments. The project includes residential landscaping, hardscape improvements, drainage improvements, utility connections, perimeter wall/fencing, and a new driveway. The Project also qualifies for the Class 5 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15305 because the requested front yard setback modification and protected tree encroachment activities constitute limited site modifications necessary to accommodate the placement of the residence, associated improvement, and related construction activities on the property and involve minor alterations in land use limitations and site conditions. (refer to Attachment No. 6). PUBLIC COMMENTS/NOTICE A public hearing notice for this item was posted at the City Clerk’s Office, City Council Chambers, at the Arcadia Library, and on the City’s website on May 14, 2026. It was also mailed to the property owners located within 300 feet of the subject property. As of May 22, 2026, no comments were received. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2189 and find that this project is Categorically Exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), and approve Planning Commission Administrative Modification No. PC AM 26-02, Healthy Protected Tree Removal Permit No. TRH 26-03, and 12 Resolution No. 2189 – 945 Singing Wood Drive May 26, 2026 Page 8 of 11 Protected Tree Encroachment Permit No. TRE 26-06 subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. The Project shall be developed and maintained by the Applicant/Property Owner in a manner that is consistent with the plans submitted and conditionally approved for PC AM 26-02, TRH 26-03, and TRE 26-06. 2. Prior to final inspection, the Applicant/Property Owner shall plant a minimum of two (2) 24-inch box Coast Live Oak trees on the subject property as replacement trees for the removal of the protected Coast Live Oak tree. The replacement trees shall be shown on the final landscape plan submitted for plan check review and the location shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Division. A follow-up report prepared by the Project arborist confirming installation of the replacement trees shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 3. The Applicant/Property Owner shall protect all protected trees designated for retention on the subject property throughout all demolition and construction activities in accordance with the recommendations contained in the Arborist Report dated October 24, 2025. 4. Noncompliance with the plans, provisions and conditions of approval for Planning Commission Administrative Modification No. PC AM 26-02, Healthy Protected Tree Removal Permit No. TRH 26-03 and Protected Tree Encroachment Permit No. TRE 26-06 may be grounds for immediate suspension or revocation of any approvals. 5. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Applicant must defend, indemnify, and hold the City, any departments, agencies, divisions, boards, and/or commissions of the City, and its elected officials, officers, contractors serving as City officials, agents, employees, and attorneys of the City (“Indemnitees”) harmless from liability for damages and/or claims, actions, or proceedings for damages for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage, and with respect to all other actions and liabilities for damages caused or alleged to have been caused by reason of the Applicant’s activities in connection with PC AM 26- 02, TRH 26-03 and TRE 26-06 (“Project”) on the Project site, and which may arise from the direct or indirect operations of the Applicant or those of the Applicant’s contractors, agents, tenants, employees or any other persons acting on 13 Resolution No. 2189 – 945 Singing Wood Drive May 26, 2026 Page 9 of 11 Applicant’s behalf, which relate to the development and/or construction of the Project. This indemnity provision applies to all damages and claims, actions, or proceedings for damages, as described above, regardless of whether the City prepared, supplied, or approved the plans, specifications, or other documents for the Project. In the event of any legal action challenging the validity, applicability, or interpretation of any provision of this approval, or any other supporting document relating to the Project, the City will notify the Applicant of the claim, action, or proceedings and will cooperate in the defense of the matter. The Applicant must indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Indemnitees, and each of them, with respect to all liability, costs and expenses incurred by, and/or awarded against, the City or any of the Indemnitees in relation to such action. Within 15 days’ notice from the City of any such action, the Applicant shall provide to the City a cash deposit to cover legal fees, costs, and expenses incurred by City in connection with defense of any legal action in an initial amount to be reasonably determined by the City Attorney. The City may draw funds from the deposit for such fees, costs, and expenses. Within 5 business days of each and every notice from the City that the deposit has fallen below the initial amount, Applicant/Property Owner shall replenish the deposit each and every time in order for City’s legal team to continue working on the matter. The City shall only refund to the Applicant/Property Owner any unexpended funds from the deposit within 30 days of: (i) a final, non-appealable decision by a court of competent jurisdiction resolving the legal action; or (ii) full and complete settlement of legal action. The City shall have the right to select legal counsel of its choice. The parties hereby agree to cooperate in defending such action. The City will not voluntarily assist in any such third-party challenge(s). In consideration for approval of the Project, this condition shall remain in effect if the entitlement(s) related to this Project is rescinded or revoked, at the request of the Applicant or not. 6. Approval of Planning Commission Administrative Modification No. PC AM 26-02, Healthy Protected Tree Removal Permit No. TRH 26-03 and Protected Tree Encroachment Permit No. TRE 26-06 shall not be effective unless on or before 30 calendar days after Planning Commission adoption of the Resolution, the property owner and Applicant have executed and filed with the Development Services Director or designee an Acceptance Form available from the Development Services Department to indicate awareness and acceptance of these conditions of approval. 14 Resolution No. 2189 – 945 Singing Wood Drive May 26, 2026 Page 10 of 11 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Approval If the Planning Commission intends to approve this proposal, the Commission should pass a motion to approve Planning Commission Administrative Modification No. PC AM 26-02, Protected Healthy Tree Removal Permit No. TRH 26-03, and Protected Tree Encroachment Permit No. TRE 26-06, stating that the proposal satisfies the requisite findings and requirements of the Arcadia Development Code, and adopt the attached Resolution No. 2189 incorporating the requisite environmental determination, findings, and conditions of approval as presented in this staff report, or as modified by the Commission. Denial If the Planning Commission intends to deny this proposal, the Commission should pass a motion to deny Planning Commission Administrative Modification No. PC AM 26-02, Protected Healthy Tree Removal Permit No. TRH 26-03, and Protected Tree Encroachment Permit No. TRE 26-; state the finding(s) or requirements that the proposal does not satisfy with reasons based on the record; and direct staff to prepare a resolution for adoption at the next meeting incorporating the Commission’s decision and specific findings. If any Planning Commissioner or other interested party has any questions or comments regarding this matter prior to the May 26, 2026, hearing, please contact Senior Planner, Melissa Chipres at (626) 574-5447, or mchipres@ArcadiaCA.gov. Approved: Fiona Graham On behalf of Lisa L. Flores Development Services Director 15 Resolution No. 2189 – 945 Singing Wood Drive May 26, 2026 Page 11 of 11 Attachment No. 1: Resolution No. 2189 Attachment No. 2: Aerial Photo with Zoning Information & Photos of the Subject Property Attachment No. 3: Rancho Santa Anita ARB Approval and Draft Meeting Minutes Attachment No. 4: Architectural Plans Attachment No. 5: Arborist Report Attachment No. 6: Preliminary Exemption Assessment 16 Attachment No. 1 Attachment No. 1 Resolution No. 2189 17 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2189 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANNING COMMISSION ADMINISTRATIVE MODIFICATION NO. PC AM 26-02 FOR A FRONT YARD SETBACK ENCROACHMENT AND HEALTHY PROTECTED TREE REMOVAL PERMIT NO. TRH 26-03 AND PROTECTED TREE ENCROACHMENT PERMIT NO. TRE 26-06 FOR A PROPOSED TWO-STORY SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE AT 945 SINGING WOOD DRIVE WHEREAS, on April 6, 2026, an application for Planning Commission Administrative Modification No. PC AM 26-02 and Healthy Protected Tree Removal Permit No. TRH 26-03, and on May 12, 2026, an application for Protected Tree Encroachment Permit No. TRE 26-06 were filed by Sanyao Design Group, Inc., on behalf of the property owner, Ken Liu (“Applicant”) to allow a reduced front yard setback, removal of one protected healthy Coast Live Oak tree, and encroachment into the protected zone of various protected trees for the construction of a new single-family residence located at 945 Singing Wood Drive (the “Project”); and WHEREAS, the Project includes demolition of the existing residence and associated accessory structures, which are currently under review through Certificate of Demolition No. COD 26-10, and a Historic Resource Evaluation prepared for the property concluded that the existing residence is not eligible for designation as a historic resource under the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) or the City’s Landmark criteria; and 18 2 WHEREAS, the proposed single-family residence was considered at a duly noticed public hearing before the Rancho Santa Anita Homeowners Association Architectural Review Board (“Upper Rancho ARB”) on March 18, 2026, at which time the Upper Rancho ARB approved the project by a 4-1 vote, with one Board member absent; and WHEREAS, on May 6, 2026, Planning Services completed an environmental assessment for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) and determined that the Project qualifies for a Class 3 and Class 5 Categorical Exemption under Sections 15303(a) and 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines pertaining to New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures and Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations; and WHEREAS, on May 26, 2026, a duly noticed public hearing was held before the Planning Commission on said application, at which time all interested persons were given full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence. NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The factual data submitted by the Development Services Division in the staff report dated May 26, 2026, are true and correct. 19 3 SECTION 2. This Commission finds that based upon the entire record, pursuant to Section 9107.05.050 of the Development Code: 1. That the purpose of the Modification procedures is for one or more of the following: a. Secure an appropriate improvement of a lot; b. Prevent an unreasonable hardship; or c. Promote uniformity of development. FACT: The proposed front setback modification would promote uniformity of development and prevent an unreasonable hardship by allowing the proposed residence to have a 120-foot front yard setback in lieu of the required approximately 151’-6” setback. The required setback is based on the average front yard setbacks of the two adjacent properties located at 935 and 975 Singing Wood Drive, which have unusually deep front setbacks of approximately 119’-1” and 184’-2”, respectively. While front yard setbacks throughout the surrounding neighborhood vary, most residences have setbacks of less than 100 feet. The proposed 120-foot setback remains substantial in depth, exceeds the setback of the existing residence on the property, which is approximately 109’-4”, and is generally consistent with the adjacent residence at 935 Singing Wood Drive, thereby maintaining the established estate-style character of the neighborhood. Strict application of the required setback would push 20 4 the proposed residence significantly farther toward the rear of the property, resulting in a disproportionately smaller and less functional rear yard area and an oversized front yard. The proposed front setback modification allows for a more balanced and functional site layout with deeper rear yard open space, recreational amenities, and reduced impacts to existing mature trees. Accordingly, the requested modification promotes uniformity of development and prevents an unreasonable hardship resulting from the application of an unusually deep front yard setback requirement. 2. Pursuant to Section 9110.01.070(A)(2) of the Development Code, an Arborist Report prepared by a Certified Arborist was provided and it evaluated the health of the protected tree proposed for removal, the necessity for removal, alternative design considerations, and proposed mitigation measures. FACT: The provided Arborist Report prepared by Javier Cabral Consulting Arborist identifies Tree No. 42 as a protected Coast Live Oak with a diameter of approximately 23 inches and a “C” health rating. The Arborist Report does not identify the tree as dead, diseased, or hazardous. The Arborist Report concludes that removal of Tree No. 42 is necessary due to its location in the middle of the property, which is within the footprint of the proposed pool and associated site improvements which form part of the Project. The Project retains all other mature protected trees located throughout the site and incorporates tree protection measures intended to minimize 21 5 impacts during demolition and construction activities. In compliance with the Development Code, the Applicant will be required to plant two (2) new 24-inch box Coast Live Oak trees on the property as a replacement of the removed Coast Live Oak tree. SECTION 3. This Project is Categorically Exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Sections 15303(a) and 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines pertaining to New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures and Minor Alterations in Land Use Limitations. The Project qualifies for the Class 3 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15303(a) because it consists of the construction one new detached single-family residence on an existing developed residential parcel surrounded by existing urban residential developments. The project includes residential landscaping, hardscape improvements, drainage improvements, utility connections, perimeter wall/fencing, and a new driveway. The Project also qualifies for the Class 5 Categorical Exemption pursuant to Section 15305 because the requested front yard setback modification and protected tree encroachment activities constitute limited site modifications necessary to accommodate the placement of the residence, associated improvement, and related construction activities on the property and involve minor alterations in land use limitations and site conditions. 22 6 SECTION 4. For the foregoing reasons, the Planning Commission determines that the Project is Categorically Exempt pursuant to Sections 15303(a) and 15305, Class 3 and Class 5, of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines and approves Planning Commission Administrative Modification No. PC AM 26-02 for a front setback modification and Healthy Protected Tree Removal Permit No. TRH 26- 03 and Protected Tree Encroachment Permit No. TRE 26-06 for the removal of one protected healthy Coast Live Oak tree and encroachment into the protected zone of various protected trees for the construction of a new single-family residence located at 945 Singing Wood Drive, subject to the conditions of approval attached hereto. SECTION 5. The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution. [SIGNATURES ON THE NEXT PAGE] 23 7 Passed, approved and adopted this 26th day of May, 2026. ______________________ Domenico Tallerico Chair, Planning Commission ATTEST: ______________________ Lisa L. Flores Secretary APPROVED AS TO FORM: ______________________ Michael J. Maurer City Attorney _____________________________ 24 8 Page Intentionally Left Blank 25 9 RESOLUTION NO. 2189 Conditions of Approval 1. The Project shall be developed and maintained by the Applicant/Property Owner in a manner that is consistent with the plans submitted and conditionally approved for PC AM 26-02, TRH 26-03, and TRE 26-06. 2. Prior to final inspection, the Applicant/Property Owner shall plant a minimum of two (2) 24-inch box Coast Live Oak trees on the subject property as replacement trees for the removal of the protected Coast Live Oak tree. The replacement trees shall be shown on the final landscape plan submitted for plan check review and the location shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Division. A follow-up report prepared by the Project arborist confirming installation of the replacement trees shall be submitted to the City prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy. 3. The Applicant/Property Owner shall protect all protected trees designated for retention on the subject property throughout all demolition and construction activities in accordance with the recommendations contained in the Arborist Report dated October 24, 2025. 4. Noncompliance with the plans, provisions and conditions of approval for Planning Commission Administrative Modification No. PC AM 26-02, Healthy Protected Tree Removal Permit No. TRH 26-03 and Protected Tree Encroachment Permit No. TRE 26-06 may be grounds for immediate suspension or revocation of any approvals. 5. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Applicant must defend, indemnify, and hold the City, any departments, agencies, divisions, boards, and/or commissions of the City, and its elected officials, officers, contractors serving as City officials, agents, employees, and attorneys of the City (“Indemnitees”) harmless from liability for damages and/or claims, actions, or proceedings for damages for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage, and with respect to all other actions and liabilities for damages caused or alleged to have been caused by reason of the Applicant’s activities in connection with PC AM 26- 02, TRH 26-03 and TRE 26-06 (“Project”) on the Project site, and which may arise from the direct or indirect operations of the Applicant or those of the Applicant’s contractors, agents, tenants, employees or any other persons acting on 26 10 Applicant’s behalf, which relate to the development and/or construction of the Project. This indemnity provision applies to all damages and claims, actions, or proceedings for damages, as described above, regardless of whether the City prepared, supplied, or approved the plans, specifications, or other documents for the Project. In the event of any legal action challenging the validity, applicability, or interpretation of any provision of this approval, or any other supporting document relating to the Project, the City will notify the Applicant of the claim, action, or proceedings and will cooperate in the defense of the matter. The Applicant must indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Indemnitees, and each of them, with respect to all liability, costs and expenses incurred by, and/or awarded against, the City or any of the Indemnitees in relation to such action. Within 15 days’ notice from the City of any such action, the Applicant shall provide to the City a cash deposit to cover legal fees, costs, and expenses incurred by City in connection with defense of any legal action in an initial amount to be reasonably determined by the City Attorney. The City may draw funds from the deposit for such fees, costs, and expenses. Within 5 business days of each and every notice from the City that the deposit has fallen below the initial amount, Applicant/Property Owner shall replenish the deposit each and every time in order for City’s legal team to continue working on the matter. The City shall only refund to the Applicant/Property Owner any unexpended funds from the deposit within 30 days of: (i) a final, non-appealable decision by a court of competent jurisdiction resolving the legal action; or (ii) full and complete settlement of legal action. The City shall have the right to select legal counsel of its choice. The parties hereby agree to cooperate in defending such action. The City will not voluntarily assist in any such third-party challenge(s). In consideration for approval of the Project, this condition shall remain in effect if the entitlement(s) related to this Project is rescinded or revoked, at the request of the Applicant or not. 6. Approval of Planning Commission Administrative Modification No. PC AM 26-02, Healthy Protected Tree Removal Permit No. TRH 26-03 and Protected Tree Encroachment Permit No. TRE 26-06 shall not be effective unless on or before 30 calendar days after Planning Commission adoption of the Resolution, the property owner and Applicant have executed and filed with the Development Services Director or designee an Acceptance Form available from the Development Services Department to indicate awareness and acceptance of these conditions of approval. 27 11 ---- 28 Attachment No. 2 Attachment No. 2 Aerial Photo with Zoning Information & Photos of the Subject Site 29 Overlays Selected parcel highlighted Parcel location within City of Arcadia N/A Property Owner(s): Lot Area (sq ft): Year Built: Main Structure / Unit (sq. ft.): R-O (30,000) Number of Units: RE Property Characteristics 1957 4,173 1 Property Owner Site Address:945 SINGING WOOD DR Parcel Number: 5769-014-007 N/A Zoning: General Plan: N/A Downtown Overlay: Downtown Parking Overlay: Architectural Design Overlay:Yes N/A N/A N/A Residential Flex Overlay: N/A N/A N/A Yes Special Height Overlay: N/A Parking Overlay: Racetrack Event Overlay: This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. Report generated 20-May-2026 Page 1 of 1 30 Attachment No. 3 Attachment No. 3 Rancho Santa Anita Architectural Review Board (ARB) Approval and Draft Meeting Minutes 31 Rancho Santa Anita Property Owners’ Association ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -1- Date: March 26, 2026 File No. 310 Project Address: 945 Singing Wood Dr Association Name: RSAPOA Applicant Name: Ken Liu Property Owner(s) Name: Ken Liu Project Description: New home FINDINGS Only check those that are apply and provide a written explanation for each The proposed project 5 is, is not consistent with the Site Planning Principles and Neighborhood Context Guidelines. Explanation: Proposed residence abides by the Design Guidelines. The proposed project 5is, is not consistent with the Forms and Mass Guidelines. Explanation: New proposed residence is consistent with guidelines. The proposed project 5 is, is not consistent with the Frontage Conditions Guidelines. Explanation: New residence abides by required setbacks and frontage Recommendations. The proposed project 5 is, is not consistent with the Garages and Driveways Guidelines. Explanation: Proposed garages and driveways conform with Design Guidelines The proposed project 5 is, is not consistent with the Architectural Styles Guidelines. Explanation: New proposed residence is consistent with guidelines. 32 Rancho Santa Anita Property Owners’ Association ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -2- The proposed project 5 is, is not consistent with the Height, Bulk, and Scale Guidelines. Explanation: Proposed residence abides by the Design Guidelines The proposed project 5is, is not consistent with the Roofline Guidelines. Explanation: Proposed residence abides by the Design Guidelines The proposed project 5is, is not consistent with the Entries Guidelines. Explanation: New entry abides by the Design Guidelines The proposed project 5 is, is not consistent with the Windows and Doors Guidelines. Explanation: Proposed residence abides by the Design Guidelines The proposed project 5is, is not consistent with the Articulation Guidelines. Explanation: Proposed residence abides by the Design Guidelines The proposed project 5is, is not consistent with the Facade Details Guidelines. Explanation: Proposed residence abides by the Design Guidelines The proposed project 5 is, is not consistent with the Colors and Materials Guidelines. Explanation: Proposed residence abides by the Design Guidelines 33 Rancho Santa Anita Property Owners’ Association ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -3- The proposed project 5 is, is not consistent with the Accessory Lighting Guidelines. Explanation: Proposed residence abides by the Design Guidelines The proposed project 5 is, is not consistent with the Additions, Alterations, and Accessory Buildings/Structures Guidelines. Explanation: Proposed residence abides by the Design Guidelines The proposed project 5 is, is not consistent with the Hillside Properties Guidelines. Explanation: Not applicable The proposed project 5 is, is not consistent with the Fences, Walls, Gates, and Hedges Guidelines. Explanation: Proposed residence abides by the Design Guidelines The proposed project 5is, is not consistent with the Impervious Coverage and Landscape Areas Guidelines. Explanation: Proposed residence abides by the Design Guidelines ACTION Pursuant to City’s Development Code Section 9107.20.050, a Site Plan and Design Review in the Homeowners Association Areas may be approved only if it is found that the proposed development is consistent with the City’s adopted Design Guidelines. 5 APPROVED CONDITIONALLY APPROVED DENIED Date of ARB Meeting: MARCH 18, 2026 ARB Members Rendering the Above Decision: Sanjay B. Kucheria (Chair), Diana Nee (Vice Chair), Shahnawaz Ahmad, Sudheer Donthineni AYES: 4 NOES: 0 ABSENT: 1 34 Rancho Santa Anita Property Owners’ Association ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -4- Conditions of Approval: Front yard setback being less than the average of the two adjacent homes is approved by the ARB. Removal of one oak tree adjacent to existing pool is being allowed in lieu of 2 new oaks in front yard. Reason for Denial: There is a ten (10) day appeal period for this application. To file an appeal, a completed Appeal Application form must be submitted to the City’s Planning Division along with a $772.00 appeal fee by 5 p.m. on April 6, 2026. You will be notified if an appeal is filed. Approved designs shall expire in one year from the effective date unless plans are submitted to Building Services for plan-check, a building permit is issued and the construction is diligently pursued, a certificate of occupancy has been issued, or the approval is renewed. The final plans must be consistent with the approved design concept plans and any conditions of approval. Any inconsistency from the approved design concept plans may preclude the issuance of a building permit. An extension may be granted by the ARB or designee, or the Review Authority that approved the project for a maximum period of one (1) year from the initial expiration date. An extension can only be granted if the required findings can be made. Please note that acceptance of an extension request does not indicate approval of an extension. You may visit the City’s website at www.ArcadiaCA.gov/noticesanddecisions to view this document. If you have any questions regarding the above decision, please contact the ARB Chairperson at rsapoaarb@gmail.com / 818-389-9131. Thank you. c: City of Arcadia, Planning Division 35 Rancho Santa Anita Property Owners’ Association Architectural Review Board (ARB) Minutes of Meeting Date:March 18, 2026 Time:6pm Location:Council Conference Room, City Hall, City of Arcadia 1. Attendance Chairman:Sanjay Kucheria ARB Members Present: x Diana Nee, Vice Chair x Shahnawaz Ahmad x Sudheer Donthineni Members Absent: x Brad Koehler Guests/Residents Present: x Ken Liu, Mrs. Liu, Robert Tong (architect), Emily Tong (architect), Mr & Mrs. Ratto (neighbors to Mr. and Mrs. Liu) 2. Call to Order x Meeting called to order at 6pmby Sanjay Kucheria x ŪĺŘŪıϙèĺĲƱŘıôîϡϙYes 3. Approval of Previous Minutes x Minutes of October 30, 2025, ARB meeting were reviewed x aĺťĖĺĲϙťĺϙÍŕŕŘĺŽôϡϙDiana Nee x ôèĺĲîôîϙæƅϡϙShahnawaz Ahmad x "ôèĖŜĖĺĲϡϙŕŕŘĺŽôî 36 4. Review of Submitted Plans Resident: Ken Liu, Mrs. Liu Proposal: New Home at 945 Singing Wood Dr Discussion Points: x The new home complied with the various Guidelines laid down by the City Decision: Approved Conditions/Exceptions (if any): a. Allowed shorter front yard setback, b. Allowed removal of one oak tree. 5. Other Business x None 6. Action Items x None 7. Next Meeting x None scheduled 8. Adjournment x Meeting adjourned at 7pm Prepared by: Sanjay Kucheria, Chairman Date of Preparation: March 18, 2026 Approval: x These minutes will be presented for approval at the next ARB meeting. x Once approved, they will be submitted to the City of Arcadia Planning Department. 37 Attachment No. 4 Attachment No. 4 Architectural Plans 38 PO O L EQ . OP E N WO R K S P A C E EL E V . OPE N TO A B O V E & B E L O W ST O R A G E CL A S S R O O M OPE N TO A B O V E CH E F ' S KIT C H E N DUMBWAITER KIT C H E N LIV I N G R O O M PW D R . RM . LA U N D R Y MU D R M . M. B A T H # 1 W.I . C . GU E S T SU I T E # 1 GU E S T SU I T E # 2 W. I . C . M. B A T H # 2 LI B R A R Y DI N I N G R M . PA N T R Y PA N T R Y MU S I C R O O M ST O R A G E PW D R . RM . OP E N TO A B O V E ST O R A G E OPE N TO B E L O W PO O L B A T H ST O R A G E BU T L E R ' S PA N T R Y RE S T AR E A MO T O R CO U R T EN T R Y FO Y E R SIT T I N G AR E A OP E N TO A B O V E ST O . CA B I N E T CO V E R E D PO R C H (3 4 S . F . ) PO O L T O Y S ST O . ST O R A G E EL E C . RM . LIG H T W E L L O P E N TO B E L O W LIG H T W E L L O P E N TO B E L O W 2- C A R G A R A G E (5 1 1 S . F . ) 2- C A R G A R A G E (5 2 2 S . F . ) PW D R . RM . ST O R A G E PO O L H O U S E CA B A N A ST O . ST O . 01-23-2026 SEE PLAN 2025-07                  VE G G I E BO X PLAYGROUND ST. AUGUSTINE ST. AUGUSTINE ST. AUGUSTINE N 00°28'35" W R= 9 7 0 . 0 0 ' Δ=0 0 ° 3 7 ' 3 5 " L= 1 0 . 6 1 ' N 8 2 ° 2 8 ' 2 0 " W 5 3 . 9 6 ' R= 6 3 0 . 0 0 ' 316.63' 19 2 . 0 0 ' N 00°28'35" W 50.00'N 8 8 ° 4 2 ' 2 5 " E 4. 0 0 ' Δ=1 2 ° 0 2 ' 2 0 " L= 1 3 2 . 3 7 ' 282.54' N 8 8 ° 4 9 ' 2 5 " E N 00°28'35" W ST. AUGUSTINE SCALE: 1" = 10'-0" SITE PLAN REVISIONS DATE NO Date Scale Drawn Job Sheet SI N G L E F A M I L Y H O U S E & P O O L H O U S E 94 5 S I N G I N G W O O D D R . AR C A D I A , C A 9 1 0 0 6 T-1 1SCOPE OF WORK FR O N T A G E : 1 9 6 . 9 4 ' CONCRETE DRIVEWAY (WASHED FINISH) 39 01-27-2026 SEE PLAN 2025-07 REVISIONS DATE NO Date Scale Drawn Job Sheet SI N G L E F A M I L Y H O U S E & P O O L H O U S E 94 5 S I N G I N G W O O D D R . AR C A D I A , C A 9 1 0 0 6 T-1.1 SA N T A M A R G A R I T A D R 741 SINGING WOOD DR. 755 56'-0" 801825 60'-8 " 841895905 GL E N C O E D R . 925935 945975 184'-2"153'-6" 1001 99'-0" 1015 89'-0" 995 102510351045106510751085 1101 50'-0" HAMPTO N R D . 1115 1125 1131 1145 935 945 975 EXHIBIT A: PROPERTIES ALONG SINGING WOOD DR. (NORTH SIDE) 935 945 975 EXST. BLDG. VS. ADJACENT PROPERTIES PROPOSED BLDG. (W/ F.Y.S. MODIFCATION) VS. ADJACENT PROPERTIES 935 945 975 PROPOSED BLDG. (W/ REQ. SETBACK) VS. ADJACENT PROPERTIES 45'-8" 75'-8" 48'-7"47'-9" 48'-9"44'-7"119'-1"109'-4" SUBJECT PROPERTY 78'-8" 58'-9"58'-4 " 83'-3"48'-4"40'-9" 41'-2" 42'-1" 64'-2" 63'-7" 755 SINGINGWOOD DR. 801 SINGINGWOOD DR. 825 SINGINGWOOD DR. 895 SINGINGWOOD DR. 995 SINGINGWOOD DR. 1001 SINGINGWOOD DR. 1015 SINGINGWOOD DR. 1025 SINGINGWOOD DR. 1035 SINGINGWOOD DR. 1101 SINGINGWOOD DR. 1131 SINGINGWOOD DR. 56'-0" 75'-8" 60'-8" 47'-9" 153'-6" 99'-0" 89'-0" 78'-8" 58'-9" 50'-0" 64'-2" ADDRESS FRONT YARD SETBACK AVERAGE FRONT YARD SETBACK: 75'-9" NEWER CONSTRUCTION (2-STORY) 755 SINGINGWOOD DR. 801 SINGINGWOOD DR. 825 SINGINGWOOD DR. 895 SINGINGWOOD DR. 995 SINGINGWOOD DR. 1001 SINGINGWOOD DR. 1015 SINGINGWOOD DR. 1025 SINGINGWOOD DR. 1035 SINGINGWOOD DR. 1101 SINGINGWOOD DR. 1131 SINGINGWOOD DR. 56'-0" 75'-8" 60'-8" 47'-9" 153'-6" 99'-0" 89'-0" 78'-8" 58'-9" 50'-0" 64'2" ADDRESS FRONT YARD SETBACK ALL CONSTRUCTION 741 SINGINGWOOD DR.45'-8" 841 SINGINGWOOD DR.48'-7" 905 SINGINGWOOD DR.48'-9" 925 SINGINGWOOD DR.44'-7" 935 SINGINGWOOD DR.119'-1" 945 SINGINGWOOD DR.108'-1" 975 SINGINGWOOD DR.184'-2" 1045 SINGINGWOOD DR.58'-4" 1065 SINGINGWOOD DR.83'-3" 1075 SINGINGWOOD DR.48'-4" 1085 SINGINGWOOD DR.40'-9" 1115 SINGINGWOOD DR.41'-2" 1125 SINGINGWOOD DR.42'-1" 1145 SINGINGWOOD DR.63'-7" AVERAGE FRONT YARD SETBACK: 71'-8" NEWER CONSTRUCTION (2-STORY) 40 OPEN TO ABOVESTORAGE A/V RM. STORAGE GUITAR COLLECTION RM. LIGHTWELLOPEN TOABOVE STO. THEATER GYM STO. PWDR. RM. MASSAGE RM. LOCKER RM. HAIR SALON GYM BATH SAUNA REST AREA LIGHTWELL OPEN TO ABOVE SUBTERRANEAN FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 3/16"= 1'-0" 4,300 SQ. FT. (BUILDING AREA) DUM B W A I T E R LIGHTWELLOPEN TOABOVE 01-14-2025 SEE PLAN 2025-04 25 5 E . S a n t a C l a r a S t . , # 2 0 0 , A r c a d i a , C A 9 1 0 0 6 , U . S . A . Re s i d e n t i a l P l a n n i n g & D e s i g n Te l ( 6 2 6 ) 4 4 6 - 8 0 4 8 F a x ( 6 2 6 ) 4 4 6 - 7 0 9 0 St a m p Date Scale Sheet Job Drawn NODATE REVISIONS A-1 SI N G L E F A M I L Y H O U S E & P O O L H O U S E 94 5 S I N G I N G W O O D D R I V E AR C A D I A , C A 9 1 0 0 6 41 OPEN WORKSPACE ELEV. OPEN TO ABOVE& BELOW STORAGE CLASSROOM OPENTO ABOVE CHEF'S KITCHEN DUM B W A I T E R KITCHEN LIVING ROOM PWDR. RM. LAUNDRY MUD RM. M. BATH #1 W.I.C. GUEST SUITE #1 GUEST SUITE #2 W.I.C. M. BATH #2 LIBRARY DINING RM. PANTRY PANTRY MUSIC ROOM STORAGE PWDR. RM. OPEN TO ABOVE STORAGE OPEN TO BELOW POOL BATH STORAGE BUTLER'SPANTRY REST AREA MOTOR COURT ENTRY FOYER SITTING AREA OPENTO ABOVE STO. CABINET COVERED PORCH (34 S.F.) FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 3/16"= 1'-0" 7,719 SQ. FT. POOL TOYS STO. STORAGE ELEC. RM. LIGHTWELL OPEN TO BELOW LIGHTWELL OPEN TO BELOW A-2 2-CAR GARAGE (511 S.F.) 2-CAR GARAGE (522 S.F.) 01-14-2025 SEE PLAN 2025-04 25 5 E . S a n t a C l a r a S t . , # 2 0 0 , A r c a d i a , C A 9 1 0 0 6 , U . S . A . Re s i d e n t i a l P l a n n i n g & D e s i g n Te l ( 6 2 6 ) 4 4 6 - 8 0 4 8 F a x ( 6 2 6 ) 4 4 6 - 7 0 9 0 St a m p Date Scale Sheet Job Drawn NODATE REVISIONS SI N G L E F A M I L Y H O U S E & P O O L H O U S E 94 5 S I N G I N G W O O D D R I V E AR C A D I A , C A 9 1 0 0 6 42 DUM B W A I T E R OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW ELEV. STUDY RM. LOFT W.I.C. BATH #1 BEDRM. #1 PWDR. RM. BEDRM. #2 W.I.C. BATH #2 W.I.C. BATH #3 BEDRM. #3 LIVING AREA OFFICEMASTER BATH #1 MASTER SUITE #1 W.I.C. MASTER SUITE #2 W.I.C. MASTER BATH #2 STO. BALCONY BALCONY OPEN TO BELOW BAR AREA LI N E N C L O . ST O . SCALE: 3/16"= 1'-0" 5,831 SQ. FT. SECOND FLOOR PLAN A-3 01-14-2025 SEE PLAN 2025-04 25 5 E . S a n t a C l a r a S t . , # 2 0 0 , A r c a d i a , C A 9 1 0 0 6 , U . S . A . Re s i d e n t i a l P l a n n i n g & D e s i g n Te l ( 6 2 6 ) 4 4 6 - 8 0 4 8 F a x ( 6 2 6 ) 4 4 6 - 7 0 9 0 St a m p Date Scale Sheet Job Drawn NODATE REVISIONS SI N G L E F A M I L Y H O U S E & P O O L H O U S E 94 5 S I N G I N G W O O D D R I V E AR C A D I A , C A 9 1 0 0 6 43 ROOF PLAN (MAIN HOUSE) SCALE : 3/16" =1'-0" A-4 01-14-2025 SEE PLAN 2025-04 25 5 E . S a n t a C l a r a S t . , # 2 0 0 , A r c a d i a , C A 9 1 0 0 6 , U . S . A . Re s i d e n t i a l P l a n n i n g & D e s i g n Te l ( 6 2 6 ) 4 4 6 - 8 0 4 8 F a x ( 6 2 6 ) 4 4 6 - 7 0 9 0 St a m p Date Scale Sheet Job Drawn NODATE REVISIONS SI N G L E F A M I L Y H O U S E & P O O L H O U S E 94 5 S I N G I N G W O O D D R I V E AR C A D I A , C A 9 1 0 0 6 44 A-5 FRONT ELEVATION (SOUTH) SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 01-14-2025 SEE PLAN 2025-04 25 5 E . S a n t a C l a r a S t . , # 2 0 0 , A r c a d i a , C A 9 1 0 0 6 , U . S . A . Re s i d e n t i a l P l a n n i n g & D e s i g n Te l ( 6 2 6 ) 4 4 6 - 8 0 4 8 F a x ( 6 2 6 ) 4 4 6 - 7 0 9 0 St a m p Date Scale Sheet Job Drawn NODATE REVISIONS SI N G L E F A M I L Y H O U S E & P O O L H O U S E 94 5 S I N G I N G W O O D D R I V E AR C A D I A , C A 9 1 0 0 6 ELEVATION KEY NOTES SIDE ELEVATION (WEST) SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 45 A-6 SIDE ELEVATION (EAST) SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 01-14-2025 SEE PLAN 2025-04 25 5 E . S a n t a C l a r a S t . , # 2 0 0 , A r c a d i a , C A 9 1 0 0 6 , U . S . A . Re s i d e n t i a l P l a n n i n g & D e s i g n Te l ( 6 2 6 ) 4 4 6 - 8 0 4 8 F a x ( 6 2 6 ) 4 4 6 - 7 0 9 0 St a m p Date Scale Sheet Job Drawn NODATE REVISIONS SI N G L E F A M I L Y H O U S E & P O O L H O U S E 94 5 S I N G I N G W O O D D R I V E AR C A D I A , C A 9 1 0 0 6 ELEVATION KEY NOTES REAR ELEVATION (NORTH) SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 46 A-7 INTERIOR ELEVATION (FACING WEST) SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" INTERIOR ELEVATION (FACING EAST) SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" 01-14-2025 SEE PLAN 2025-04 25 5 E . S a n t a C l a r a S t . , # 2 0 0 , A r c a d i a , C A 9 1 0 0 6 , U . S . A . Re s i d e n t i a l P l a n n i n g & D e s i g n Te l ( 6 2 6 ) 4 4 6 - 8 0 4 8 F a x ( 6 2 6 ) 4 4 6 - 7 0 9 0 St a m p Date Scale Sheet Job Drawn NODATE REVISIONS SI N G L E F A M I L Y H O U S E & P O O L H O U S E 94 5 S I N G I N G W O O D D R I V E AR C A D I A , C A 9 1 0 0 6 ELEVATION KEY NOTES 47 A-8 01-14-2025 SEE PLAN 2025-04 25 5 E . S a n t a C l a r a S t . , # 2 0 0 , A r c a d i a , C A 9 1 0 0 6 , U . S . A . Re s i d e n t i a l P l a n n i n g & D e s i g n Te l ( 6 2 6 ) 4 4 6 - 8 0 4 8 F a x ( 6 2 6 ) 4 4 6 - 7 0 9 0 St a m p Date Scale Sheet Job Drawn NODATE REVISIONS SI N G L E F A M I L Y H O U S E & P O O L H O U S E 94 5 S I N G I N G W O O D D R I V E AR C A D I A , C A 9 1 0 0 6 PWDR. RM. STORAGE POOL HOUSE POOL HOUSE FLOOR PLAN SCALE: 3/16"= 1'-0" 879 SQ. FT. (POOL HOUSE) 641 SQ. FT. (CABANA) POOL HOUSE ROOF PLAN SCALE : 3/16" =1'-0" CABANA STO.STO. 48 A-9 01-14-2025 SEE PLAN 2025-04 25 5 E . S a n t a C l a r a S t . , # 2 0 0 , A r c a d i a , C A 9 1 0 0 6 , U . S . A . Re s i d e n t i a l P l a n n i n g & D e s i g n Te l ( 6 2 6 ) 4 4 6 - 8 0 4 8 F a x ( 6 2 6 ) 4 4 6 - 7 0 9 0 St a m p Date Scale Sheet Job Drawn NODATE REVISIONS SI N G L E F A M I L Y H O U S E & P O O L H O U S E 94 5 S I N G I N G W O O D D R I V E AR C A D I A , C A 9 1 0 0 6 POOL HOUSE REAR ELEVATION (NORTH) SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" POOL HOUSE SIDE ELEVATION (WEST) SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" POOL HOUSE SIDE ELEVATION (EAST) SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" POOL HOUSE FRONT ELEVATION (SOUTH) SCALE: 3/16" = 1'-0" ELEVATION KEY NOTES 49 Attachment No. 5 Attachment No. 5 Arborist Report 50 945 Singing Wood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 Prepared for: Robert Tong “SANYAO International Inc. 255 E Santa Clara St # 200 Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Prepared by: Javier Cabral Consulting Arborist International Society of Arborists # WE- 8116A 1390 El Sereno Ave Pasadena, California 91103 (626)818-8704 jctcabral@sbcglobal.net Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 1 ISA Certified Arborist 31 Dec 2025 51 Table of contents Summary & Background and Assignment -------------------------- pg. 3 Site Conditions & Google Earth Image ------------------------------ pg. 4 List Inventory ------------------------------------------------------------ pg. 5 thru 8 Site Plan With Trees ---------------------------------------------------- pg. 9 & 10 Tree Pictures ------------------------------------------------------------- pg. 11 thru 45 Protection Plan ----------------------------------------------------------- pg. 46 thru 49 Tree # 18 Removal Application --------------------------------------- pg. 50 thru 52 Arborist Signature Page ------------------------------------------------ pg. 53 Certificate Of Performance --------------------------------------------- pg. 54 Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 2 52 Summary Mr. Tong, You have retained my consulting arborist services to provide a tree inventory and protection plan for the property described as 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006.You are in the planning process of demolishing the existing single-family home and redeveloping the property with a new two-story single-family home and accessory structures. The proposed demolition and construction are expected to have minimal to moderate impact to some of the protected trees that will remain due to the distance of excavations, trenches, and footings to the tree trunks. A complete tree protection plan will be included to protect above and below ground tree parts from physical damage, soil compaction, and chemical damage. All protected trees to remain are expected to survive in good health. Background and assignment Mr. Tong has requested that I provide the following arboricultural services. 1) Identify all significant trees on the property and label them on the architectural drawings as provided to the arborist by Mr. Robert Tong. 2) Evaluate the current health of the trees and possible impacts of the proposed construction based on the provided site plan and make recommendations. 3) Provide a tree protection plan that will help ensure the short- and long-term health of the trees that will remain during and after construction activities are completed. The following report is based on my site visit on October 18, 2025 and my analysis of the trees, topo survey, and surrounding landscape. For the purpose of this report, I will address these trees as on-site Trees # 1 thru 49 and off-site Tree # 50. Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 3 53 Site conditions A one -story single-family home currently exists on this property located at 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006. There are (49) total trees on the subject project property. There are no off-site trees expected to be impacted by the proposed construction. Google Earth Image Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 4 54 A) - Healthy, vigorous tree, reasonably free of disease, with good structure and form typical of the species. B) - A tree with slight decline in vigor, small amount of twig dieback, minor structural defects that could be corrected. C) - A tree with moderate vigor, moderate twig and small branch dieback, thinning crown, poor leaf color, moderate structural defects that might be mitigated. D) – A tree in decline, epicormics growth, extensive dieback of medium to large branches, significant structural defects that cannot be abated. F) – A tree in severe decline, dieback of scaffold branches and or trunk, mostly epicormics growth, extensive structural defects that cannot be abated. List Inventory pg. 1 Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 5 55 A) - Healthy, vigorous tree, reasonably free of disease, with good structure and form typical of the species. B) - A tree with slight decline in vigor, small amount of twig dieback, minor structural defects that could be corrected. C) - A tree with moderate vigor, moderate twig and small branch dieback, thinning crown, poor leaf color, moderate structural defects that might be mitigated. D) – A tree in decline, epicormics growth, extensive dieback of medium to large branches, significant structural defects that cannot be abated. F) – A tree in severe decline, dieback of scaffold branches and or trunk, mostly epicormics growth, extensive structural defects that cannot be abated. List Inventory pg. 2 Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 6 56 A) - Healthy, vigorous tree, reasonably free of disease, with good structure and form typical of the species. B) - A tree with slight decline in vigor, small amount of twig dieback, minor structural defects that could be corrected. C) - A tree with moderate vigor, moderate twig and small branch dieback, thinning crown, poor leaf color, moderate structural defects that might be mitigated. D) – A tree in decline, epicormics growth, extensive dieback of medium to large branches, significant structural defects that cannot be abated. F) – A tree in severe decline, dieback of scaffold branches and or trunk, mostly epicormics growth, extensive structural defects that cannot be abated. List Inventory pg. 3 Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 7 57 A) - Healthy, vigorous tree, reasonably free of disease, with good structure and form typical of the species. B) - A tree with slight decline in vigor, small amount of twig dieback, minor structural defects that could be corrected. C) - A tree with moderate vigor, moderate twig and small branch dieback, thinning crown, poor leaf color, moderate structural defects that might be mitigated. D) – A tree in decline, epicormics growth, extensive dieback of medium to large branches, significant structural defects that cannot be abated. F) – A tree in severe decline, dieback of scaffold branches and or trunk, mostly epicormics growth, extensive structural defects that cannot be abated. List Inventory pg. 4 Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 8 58 Site Plan With Trees (full scale) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 9 59 Site Plan With Trees (cropped) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 10 60 Tree # 1 & 2 (facing west) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 11 # 1 # 2 61 Trees # 3 thru 5 (facing southwest) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 12 62 Tree # 4 (facing north) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 13 # 6 # 7 63 Trees # 8 & 9 (facing west) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 14 # 8 # 9 64 Tree # 10 (facing west) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 15 # 10 65 Tree # 11 (facing north) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 16 # 11 66 Trees # 12 thru 14 (facing southeast) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 avier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 17 # 12 # 13 # 14 67 Tree # 15 (facing east) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 18 # 15 68 Trees # 16 thru 18 (facing east) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 19 # 16 # 17 # 18 69 Tree # 19 (facing south) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 20 # 19 70 Tree # 20 (facing south) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 21 # 20 71 Tree # 21 (facing north) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 22 # 21 72 Trees # 22 & 23 facing northeast) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 23 # 22 # 23 73 Trees # 24 & 25 (facing north) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 24 74 Trees # 26 and 28 (facing south) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 25 75 Tree # 27 (facing north) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 26 76 Tree # 28 (facing southwest) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 27 # 28 77 Tree # 29 (facing northwest) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 28 # 29 78 Tree # 30 (facing northeast) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 29 # 30 79 Tree # 31 (facing northwest) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 30 # 31 80 Tree # 32 thru 34 (facing south) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 31 # 32 81 Tree # 35 (facing northwest) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 32 # 35 82 Tree # 36 & 37 (facing west) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 33 # 36 # 37 83 Tree # 38 (facing southwest) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 34 # 38 84 Trees # 39 # 40 (facing north) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 35 # 39 # 40 85 Tree # 41 (facing north) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 36 # 41 86 Tree # 42 (facing west) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 37 # 42 87 Tree # 43 (facing south) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 38 # 43 88 Tree # 44 (facing south) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 39 # 44 89 Tree # 45 (facing west) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 40 # 45 90 Tree # 46 (facing west) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 41 # 46 91 Tree # 47 (facing southwest) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 42 # 47 92 Tree # 48 (facing south) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 43 # 48 93 Tree # 49 (facing south) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 44 # 49 94 Tree # 50 (facing west) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 45 # 50 95 General Tree Protection Guidelines 1) Avoid damaging the roots, stem, and branches with mechanical and manual equipment. No roots shall be severed within the Tree Protection Zone TPZ which is the same as the area within the Tree Protection Fencing “TPF.” Roots greater than two inches in diameter outside of the TPZ shall be cleanly severed with a sharp tool such as a hand saw or manual pruners. 2) Avoid soil compaction by prohibiting the use of heavy equipment such as backhoes and bobcats under the tree drip line. If access within the TPZ is required during the construction process, the route shall be covered in a 6-inch layer of mulch in the TPZ, and the area shall be aerated and fertilized at the conclusion of construction. 3) Do not store or park tools, equipment, vehicles, or chemicals under the tree drip line. No equipment or debris of any kind shall be placed within the TPZ. No fuel, paint, solvent oil, thinner, asphalt, cement, grout, or any other construction chemical shall be stored or allowed in any manner to enter within the TPZ. 4) Avoid washing of equipment and tools such as wheel barrels, shovels, and mechanical motors under the tree drip line. 5) Prevent flooding and pooling of service water under the drip line. Grade changes that will flood the TPZ are prohibited unless a drainage plan is implemented. No grade changes within the TPZ shall be allowed. 6) Avoid cutting tree roots whenever possible. This can sometimes be accomplished by bridging roots, tunneling, or radial trenching. If roots must be cut use a sharp tool that will make a clean flush cut and not tear the roots. If possible, all digging under the tree drip line should be done manually to avoid tearing out of roots. Roots outside of the TPZ may be cleanly severed vertically with a sharp garden tool. 7) Do not raise or lower the grade within the tree protection zone of any protected trees unless approved by the project arborist. Roots greater than 1 inch in diameter that are exposed or damaged shall be cut with a sharp tool such as a hand saw, pruners, or loppers and covered with soil in conformance to industry standards. If any work is required within the TPZ the Arborist shall be consulted previous to begin. The Arborist shall be contacted as soon as possible to arrange for a timely inspection and prevent delays. Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 46 96 8) Place a protective barrier or temporary fencing as directed by the consulting arborist in the diagram below. The protection fencing shall be in place before demolition begins and shall only be removed or reduced when all heavy equipment such as back-hoes, bobcats, loaders, and other heavy equipment with tires and tracks will not be required. Fencing can be adjusted, or sections reduced or removed as the project advances into the landscaping phases of the project. The consulting arborist shall be contacted if there are doubts about the placement or removal of fencing. 9) Landscape preparation & excavation within the TPZ shall be limited to the use of hand tools and small hand-held power tools and shall not be of a depth that could cause root damage. No attachments or wires other than those of a protective or non-damaging method shall be attached to a protected tree. 10) Construction personnel should be briefed on the importance of the guidelines before construction begins and reminded of them during tailgate meetings and as necessary. A printed copy should be posted where employees can be reminded of it. 11) All protected trees shall be watered before, during, and after construction as needed to prevent drought stress and tree death until sprinklers have been installed and are functional. Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 47 97 Site Plan With Protection Fencing Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 48 98 Individual Tree Protection Details Trees # 1 thru 7: The impact from the proposed new driveway is expected to be minimal to zero because the new driveway is on the footprint of the existing driveway. Excavation for the driveway is expected to be minimal and to a depth of 6 inches or less. Roots within these excavations can be cleanly severed.. Trees # 8, 9 10, & 19: The impact from the proposed new driveway and home are expected to be minimal. because the new driveway and new home are on the footprint of the existing driveway and house. Excavation for the concrete walkways and new wall shall be manually excavated Roots within these excavations can be cleanly severed. Trees # 13 & 14: The impact from the proposed new driveway is expected to be minimal to zero because the new driveway is on the footprint of the existing driveway. Excavation for the driveway is expected to be minimal and to a depth of 6 inches or less. Roots within these excavations can be cleanly severed.. Trees # 18, 20, & 21: The impact from the proposed new walkways are expected to be minimal and to have an excavation of no more than 6 in. in depth. Excavation for the driveway is expected to be minimal and to a depth of 6 inches or less. Roots within these excavations can be cleanly severed. Trees # 33, 37, 38, 39, 40, & 41 : The impact from the proposed new pool house, cabana, and concrete paving are expected to be minimal to moderate impact to the trees because excavations for footings are new and under the drip lines. Initial excavations for the pool house shall be done 6 inches wide by 2 ft, deep. Roots greater than 4 inches shall be preserved if possible, if not they shall be cleanly severed with a sharp tool that will make a clean cut and not pull or tear the roots. Tree # 47 : The impact from the proposed new retaining wall that encroaches this tree is expected to have zero impact to its health. Roots encountered for the wall can be cleanly severed. Off-Site Tree # 50 : The impact from the proposed pool room, cabana, and paving is expected to have zero impact to its health. Roots encountered for the footings can be cleanly severed. Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 49 99 Removal Application Tree # 45 Oak (Pg. 1) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 50 100 Removal Application Tree # 45 Oak (Pg. 2) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 51 101 Removal Application Tree # 45 Oak (Pg. 3) Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 52 102 Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 53 103 Certificate of Performance & Limiting Conditions I Javier Cabral certify the following: x No warranty is made, expressed or implied that problems or deficiencies of the trees or the property will not occur in the future, from any cause. The Arborist shall not be responsible for damages or injuries caused by any tree defects and assume no responsibility for the correction of defects or tree related problems. x The owner and client of the trees may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the Arborist or seek additional advice if the owner decides not to accept the Arborists’ findings or recommendations. x The Arborist has no past, present or future interest in the removal or preservation of any tree. The opinions contained in the Arborist report are independent and objective judgements of the Arborist. x The findings, opinions, and recommendations of the Arborist are based on based on the physical inspection of said property. The opinions are based on knowledge, experience, and education. x The Arborist shall not be required to provide testimony, provide site monitoring, provide further documentation for changes beyond the control of the Arborist, be deposed, or to attend any meeting without contractual arrangements for additional fees to the Arborist. x The Arborist assumes no responsibility for verification of ownership or location of property lines, or for any recommendations based on inaccurate information. x This Arborist report may not be reproduced without the expressed written permission or the Arborist and the client to whom the report was provided. Any changes or alteration of this report invalidates the entire report. x Arborists are tree specialists who use their education, knowledge, training and experience to examine trees, recommend measures to enhance the beauty and health of trees, make recommendations to prevent or minimize damage to trees during and after construction projects, and attempt to reduce the risk of living near trees. Clients may choose to accept or disregard the recommendations of the arborist, or to seek additional advice. x Arborists cannot detect every condition that could possibly lead to the structural failure of a tree. Trees are living organisms that fail in ways we do not fully understand. Conditions are often hidden within trees and below ground. Arborists cannot guarantee that a tree will be healthy or safe under all circumstances, or for a specified period of time. Likewise, remedial treatments, like any medicine, cannot be guaranteed. x Treatment, pruning and removal of trees may involve considerations beyond the scope of the arborist’s services such as property boundaries, property ownership, site lines, disputes between neighbors, and other issues. Arborists cannot take such considerations into account unless complete and accurate information is disclosed to the arborist. An arborist should then be expected to reasonably rely upon the completeness and accuracy of the information provided. x Trees can be managed, but they cannot be controlled. To live near trees is to accept some degree of risk. The only way to eliminate all risks associated with trees is to eliminate all trees. Robert Tong 945 Singingwood Dr. Arcadia, CA 91006 October 24, 2025 Javier Cabral / Consulting Arborist Pg. # 54 104 Attachment No. 6 Attachment No. 6 Preliminary Exemption Assessment 105 Preliminary Exemption Assessment FORM “A” PRELIMINARY EXEMPTION ASSESSMENT 1.Name or description of project:Planning Commission Administrative Modification No. PC AM 26-02; Protected Healthy Tree Removal Permit No. TRH 26-03; and Protected Tree Encroachment Permit No. TRE 26-06 2.Project Location – Identify street address and cross streets or attach a map showing project site (preferably a USGS 15’ or 7 1/2’ topographical map identified by quadrangle name): 945 Singing Wood Drive, Arcadia, CA 91006 3.Entity or person undertaking project: A. B.Other (Private) (1)Name Sanyao Design Group Inc. (2)Address 255 E Santa Clara St # 200, Arcadia, CA 91006 4.Staff Determination: The Lead Agency’s Staff, having undertaken and completed a preliminary review of this project in accordance with the Lead Agency's "Local Guidelines for Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)" has concluded that this project does not require further environmental assessment because: a.The proposed action does not constitute a project under CEQA. b.The project is a Ministerial Project. c.The project is an Emergency Project. d.The project constitutes a feasibility or planning study. e.The project is categorically exempt. Applicable Exemption Class: Section 15303(a) and 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines pertaining to new construction of a single-family house and a minor alteration to the land use limitations. f.The project is statutorily exempt. Applicable Exemption: g.The project is otherwise exempt on the following basis: h.The project involves another public agency which constitutes the Lead Agency. Name of Lead Agency: Date: May 6, 2026 Staff: Melissa Chipres, Senior Planner 106 Preliminary Exemption Assessment FORM “A” 107 ARCADIA PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MEETING MINUTES TUESDAY, MAY 12, 2026 Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda will be made available for public inspection in the City’s Planning Services Office located at 240 W. Huntington Drive, Arcadia, California, during normal business hours. CALL TO ORDER Chair Tallerico called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Chair Tallerico, Vice Chair Tsoi, Commissioners Arvizu, Hui, and Wilander ABSENT: None SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM STAFF REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS Development Services Director, Lisa Flores, reported that one public comment was received via email prior to the meeting and it was forwarded to the Commissioners. PUBLIC COMMENTS (5 minute time limit per person) There were none. PUBLIC HEARING 1.Resolution No. 2187 – Denying Multi-Family SB 330 Application No. SB 330 25-01, Tentative Tract Map No. TTM 26-01 (84910), and Protected Healthy Tree Removal Permit No. TRH 26- 02 for a new 30 unit, multi-family residential condominium development located at 514 Fairview Avenue Recommendation: Adopt per the Planning Commission's Direction Applicant:Eric Tsang on behalf of 518 Fairview, LLC DISCUSSION CONTINUED FROM THE APRIL 28, 2026, PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING Chair Tallerico introduced the item and Development Services Director Lisa Flores explained why there were two resolutions before the Commission. The first Resolution was the original Resolution for approval, and the second was for denial per the Planning Commission’s decision at the last hearing. Ms. Flores reminded the Planning Commissioners that the Housing Accountability Act (HAA) limits local agencies from denying a project or reducing its density if they meet all objective standards unless there is evidence that the project would result in a public health or safety threat. 108 2 5/12/2026 Ms. Flores also informed the Planning Commission of the following: 1. She requested that the Commission convey which objective standards are of concern, as Staff is in the process of updating the City’s objective standards and related processes; and 2. The California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) contacted the City regarding this project. A meeting was held with Ms. Flores and the Assistant City Attorney, during which HCD stated that, if a subsequent appeal is filed, it may submit a letter in support of the project. HCD also stated that a denial by the Planning Commission could constitute a potential violation; and 3. The City Manager’s letter to the Planning Commission informed the Commissioners of the potential legal and financial risks to the City associated with a decision based on subjective grounds. Chair Tallerico stated that under different circumstances he would agree with the City Manager but that the law must be challenged at times. Commissioner Arvizu agreed and stated that he was standing by his vote to deny the project despite not having evidence of a public health or safety threat and making his decision on a subjective standard. Vice Chair Tsoi stated that he is not opposed to the density or the design, however, he did not agree that one side of a through lot should be the rear yard area and the site will only have one point of ingress and egress. Vice Chair Tsoi argued that the project did not meet the objective standards because the proposed common open spaces did not include passive or active amenities as stated in Development Code 9102.01.170.G. He stated that passive or active recreation amenities such as picnic/barbeque area, open courtyard, dog park/dog run, rooftop deck, fire pit area, or other outdoor gathering spaces shall be provided. Ms. Flores responded that those amenities or items are examples of what could be placed in the common area but are not required. Chair Tallerico agreed with the Commissioner's concerns and stated that he would be unhappy with the project if he lived in that neighborhood. Furthermore, he stated that his understanding about their role as the Planning Commission is to be strictly an advisory board to the City Council and that their decision has no bearing since the final decision maker is the City Council. 109 3 5/12/2026 Ms. Flores reminded the Commissioners that it was a final decision, and this was not a recommendation to the City Council. It will only be before the City Council if the decision is appealed. Mr. Maurer explained the difference between administrative and legislative items. He stated that administrative items involve applying the Development Code, while legislative items involve amending the Development Code. In this case, the decision is administrative, and this body is making a final decision on the item. However, the decision is subject to appeal, which is the process by which the matter could be brought before the City Council for review. Chair Tallerico stated that regardless, the decision still stands with the City Council if someone appeals it. Mr. Maurer agreed but wanted to be clear about the distinction. MOTION It was moved by Commissioner Arvizu, seconded by Vice Chair Tsoi to adopt Resolution No. 2187 to deny Multi-Family SB 30 Application No. SB 330 25-01, Tentative Tract Map No. TTM 26-01 (84910), and Protected Healthy Tree Removal Permit No. TRH 26-02 for a new 30 unit, multi-family residential condominium development located at 514 Fairview Avenue ROLL CALL AYES: Tallerico, Tsoi, and Arvizu NOES: Wilander and Hui ABSENT: None The motion was approved. There is a ten (10) day appeal period. Appeals are to be filed by 4:30 p.m. on Friday, May 22, 2026. CONSENT CALENDAR 1. Minutes of the April 28, 2026, Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission Recommendation: Approve Commissioner Wilander motioned to approve the minutes and seconded by Commissioner Arvizu. 110 4 5/12/2026 ROLL CALL AYES: Tallerico, Tsoi, Arvizu, Hui, and Wilander NOES: None ABSENT: None The motion was approved. MATTERS FROM CITY COUNCIL LIAISON Councilmember David Fu reported that Mayor Eileen Wang has resigned. MATTERS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSONERS Vice Chair Tsoi suggested adding the applicable code sections to the staff report for the waivers so that Commissioners and members of the public are better informed about standards relevant to the project. Commissioner Arvizu asked about the waivers and how it was determined that three waivers should be granted. Ms. Flores explained that the Development Code permits up to three (3) waivers, provided there is sufficient justification for each request. MATTERS FROM CITY ATTORNEY Mr. Maurer had nothing to report. MATTERS FROM STAFF INCLUDING UPCOMING AGENDA ITEMS Ms. Flores informed the Planning Commissioners that there will be items on the agenda for the next three meetings. Ms. Flores reported that Commissioner Wilander's second term is coming to an end and her last meeting will be June 9, 2026, as she will be unable to attend the final meeting in June. ADJOURNMENT The Planning Commission adjourned the meeting at 7:53 p.m., to Tuesday, May 26, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chamber. 111 5 5/12/2026 Chair Tallerico, Planning Commission ATTEST: ____________________________________ Lisa L. Flores Secretary, Planning Commission 112