The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutDecision LetterSanta Anita Oaks HOA ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -5- Date: June 26, 2025 File No. Project Address: 1200 Rancho Road Association Name: Santa Anita Oaks HOA Applicant Name: Todd Riley Property Owner(s) Name: Fame Success Investments, LLC Project Description: New construction of two stories single family residence, 13150 square feet with a 7021 square feet basement FINDINGS Only check those that are apply and provide a written explanation for each The proposed project x is, £ is not consistent with the Site Planning Principles and Neighborhood Context Guidelines. Explanation: Property visually harmonious, enhancing the neighborhood character. The proposed project x is, £ is not consistent with the Forms and Mass Guidelines. Explanation: The design of this two stories residence is well within the forms and mass guidelines. The proposed project x is, £ is not consistent with the Frontage Conditions Guidelines. Explanation: Frontage of property blends well with existing neighborhood. The proposed project x is, £ is not consistent with the Garages and Driveways Guidelines. Explanation: Garage door is facing north and not towards the street which is acceptable. However, there’s a large motor court which is a concern but the size is in scale with the lot size and size of the house. Will be partially obscured by plants and trees which is acceptable by ARB board members. Conditional approval subject to removal of fountain/sculpture and replace with a tree in the center. The proposed project x is, £ is not consistent with the Architectural Styles Guidelines. Santa Anita Oaks HOA ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -5- Explanation: This two stories French Country style home is consistent with the architectural style guidelines. The proposed project £ is, x is not consistent with the Height, Bulk, and Scale Guidelines. Explanation: Property is currently over 30 feet high. Conditional approval upon updated building plans with overall elevation height of 30 feet or below. The proposed project £ is, x is not consistent with the Roofline Guidelines. Explanation: Partially flat roof throughout property and is generally discouraged. Material not on approved list. Roof aesthetics still looks sloped from the curb with the flat roof hidden. ARB board approved the use of flat roof as it is hidden from the curbside, it’s the owner’s discretion on flat roof materials to be used. The proposed project x is, £ is not consistent with the Entries Guidelines. Explanation: Door design is architecturally compatible with the style of the home. The proposed project x is, £ is not consistent with the Windows and Doors Guidelines. Explanation: Building facades well-articulated with window and doors, also complimentary for the chosen architectural style. The proposed project x is, £ is not consistent with the Articulation Guidelines. Explanation: Not a lot of building articulation but compatible with the architectural design of the property. The proposed project x is, £ is not consistent with the Facade Details Guidelines. Explanation: Natural stones façade, stucco and wood finish is relevant to the architectural style of the property. The proposed project x is, £ is not consistent with the Colors and Materials Guidelines. Explanation: High quality building materials, natural stones and harmonious coloring Santa Anita Oaks HOA ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -5- throughout the property is compatible with the neighborhood. The proposed project x is, £ is not consistent with the Accessory Lighting Guidelines. Explanation: Beautiful exterior lights will enhance the external look of the home. The proposed project x is, £ is not consistent with the Additions, Alterations, and Accessory Buildings/Structures Guidelines. Explanation: ADU, pool house and storage and other additions consistent with architectural style of property. The proposed project £ is, £ is not consistent with the Hillside Properties Guidelines. Explanation: Not applicable. The proposed project x is, £ is not consistent with the Fences, Walls, Gates, and Hedges Guidelines. Explanation: Front yard fence conditionally approved pending dimension drawings from architect. The proposed project x is, £ is not consistent with the Impervious Coverage and Landscape Areas Guidelines. Explanation: Proposed landscape plan complements the beauty of the property. Large new plants placed will soften the visual impact of building mass. ACTION Pursuant to City’s Development Code Section 9107.20.050, a Site Plan and Design Review in the Homeowners Association Areas may be approved only if it is found that the proposed development is consistent with the City’s adopted Design Guidelines. Santa Anita Oaks HOA ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -5- £ APPROVED X CONDITIONALLY APPROVED £ DENIED Date of ARB Meeting: JUNE 24, 2025 ARB Members Rendering the Above Decision: AYES:Michael Mulvehill (ARB Chair) Jessica Louie (ARB) David Lee (ARB) David Sullivan (ARB) Krister Life (ARB) Martin Luc(ARB) Elliott Chen (ARB) NOES:0 ABSENT: Rocco Liberio Loren Brodhead Conditions of Approval: NONE 1) Need dimension drawings for front entry gate. 2) Removal of fountain/sculpture from the motor court. 3) Placement of tree in motor court to replace the fountain/sculpture. 4) Elevation drawing meeting the 30 ft height requirement. 5) Correct type of “Flat Room” to “Flat Roof” on page A-4.2 Please note all conditions of approval items were cleared on 6/26/25 and ARB board members have approved final version of the stamped architectural plan dated 6-27-25 which will be emailed to the City on same date. Reason for Denial: There is a ten (10) day appeal period for this application. To file an appeal, a completed Appeal Application form must be submitted to the City’s Planning Division along with a $600.00 appeal fee by 4:30 p.m. on July 8, 2025 You will be notified if an appeal is filed. Approved designs shall expire in one year (_June 27, 2026_) from the effective date unless plans are submitted to Building Services for plan-check, a building permit is issued and the construction is diligently pursued, a certificate of occupancy has been issued, or the approval is renewed. The final plans must be consistent with the approved design Santa Anita Oaks HOA ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD Findings and Action Report -5- concept plans and any conditions of approval. Any inconsistency from the approved design concept plans may preclude the issuance of a building permit. An extension may be granted by the ARB or designee, or the Review Authority that approved the project for a maximum period of one (1) year from the initial expiration date. An extension can only be granted if the required findings can be made. Please note that acceptance of an extension request does not indicate approval of an extension. You may visit the City’s website at www.ArcadiaCA.gov/noticesanddecisions to view this document. If you have any questions regarding the above decision, please contact the ARB Chairperson at saohoaarb@gmail.comThank you. c: City of Arcadia, Planning Division