HomeMy WebLinkAbout8-12-25 PC Agenda PacketARCADIA PLANNINGCOMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING AGENDA
Tuesday, August 12, 2025, 7:00 P.M.
Location: City Council Chambers, 240 W. Huntington Drive
Pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons with a disability who require a disability related modification or
accommodation in order to participate in a meeting, including auxiliary aids or services, may request such modification or
accommodation from the City Clerk at (626) 574-5455. Notification 48 hours prior to the meeting will enable the City to make
reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to the meeting.
(626) 574-5455 48
Pursuant to the City of Arcadia’s Language Access Services Policy, limited-English proficient speakers who require translation
services in order to participate in a meeting may request the use of a volunteer or professional translator by contacting the City
Clerk’s Office at (626) 574-5455 at least 72 hours prior to the meeting.
(626) 574-
5455 72
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL:
Marilynne Wilander, Chair
Domenico Tallerico, Vice Chair
David Arvizu, Commissioner
Angela Hui, Commissioner
Vincent Tsoi, Commissioner
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM STAFF REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS
PUBLIC COMMENTS (5 minute time limit per person)
Commission. Under the Brown Act, the Commission or Board Members are prohibited from
discussing or taking action on any item not listed on the posted agenda.
1
PUBLIC HEARING
All interested persons are invited to appear at a public hearing and to provide evidence or
testimony concerning any of the proposed items set forth below for consideration. Separate
and apart from the applicant (who may speak longer at the discretion of the Commission)
speakers shall be limited to . The applicant may additionally
submit rebuttal comments, at the discretion of the Commission.
You are hereby advised that should you desire to legally challenge in court or in an
administrative proceeding any action taken by the City Council regarding any public hearing
item, you may be limited to raising only those issues and objections you or someone else
raised at the public hearing or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at, or
prior to, the public hearing.
1. Resolution No. 2172 – Approving Multiple Family Architectural Design Review No.
MFADR 25-01 and Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 25-03 (84859) for a three-unit
Modern style, multiple family residential development at 33 E. Colorado Boulevard
CEQA: Exempt
Recommendation: Adopt
Applicant: Eric Tsang
5:30 p.m. on Monday, August
25, 2025.
CONSENT CALENDAR
All matters listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine and can be acted
on by one roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless members
of the Commission, staff, or the public request that specific items be removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate discussion and action.
2. Minutes of the July 22, 2025, Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission
Recommendation: Approve
PLANNING COMMISSION REORGANIZATION
1. Planning Commission Reorganization
Recommended Action: It is recommended that the Secretary initiate the procedure for
the reorganization of the Planning Commission.
2
MATTERS FROM CITY COUNCIL LIAISON
MATTERS FROM PLANNING COMMISSIONERS
MATTERS FROM ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
MATTERS FROM STAFF INCLUDING UPCOMING AGENDA ITEMS
ADJOURNMENT
The Planning Commission will adjourn this meeting to Tuesday, August 26, 2025, at 7:00 p.m.
Welcome to the Arcadia Planning Commission Meeting!
3
The Planning Commission encourages public participation and invites you to share your
views on City business.
MEETINGS: Regular Meetings of the Planning Commission are held on the second and fourth
Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. A full Planning
Commission agenda packet with all backup information is available at City Hall, the Arcadia
Public Library, and on the City’s website at www.ArcadiaCA.gov. Copies of individual Agenda
Reports are available via email upon request (Planning@ArcadiaCA.gov). Documents
distributed to a majority of the Planning Commission after the posting of this agenda will be
Arcadia, California.
CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: Your participation is welcomed and invited at all Planning
Commission meetings. Time is reserved at each regular meeting for those in the audience
who wish to address the Planning Commission. The City requests that persons addressing
the Planning Commission refrain from making personal, slanderous, profane, or disruptive
remarks. When the Chair asks for those who wish to speak please come to the podium and
state your name and address for the record. Please provide a copy of any written materials
used in your address to the Planning Commission as well as a copy of any printed materials
you wish to be distributed to the Planning Commission.
MATTERS NOT ON THE AGENDA should be presented during the time designated as
“PUBLIC COMMENTS.” In general, each speaker will be given (5) minutes to address the
Planning Commission; however, the Chair, at his/her discretion, may shorten the speaking
time limit to allow all speakers time to address the Planning Commission. By State law, the
Planning Commission may not discuss or vote on items not on the agenda. The matter
will automatically
placed on the agenda of a future meeting.
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND APPEALS are items scheduled for which public input is either
required or desired. Separate and apart from an applicant or appellant (who may speak
longer at the discretion of the Planning Commission), speakers shall be limited to (5) minutes
per person. The Chair, at his/her discretion, may shorten the speaking time limit to allow all
speakers to address the Planning Commission. The applicant or appellant may also be
AGENDA ITEMS: The Agenda contains the regular order of business of the Planning
Commission. Items on the Agenda have generally been reviewed and investigated by the City
a matter before making its decision.
4
CONSENT CALENDAR: Items listed on the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by
the Planning Commission and may be acted upon by one motion. There will be no separate
so requests. In this event, the item will be removed from the Consent Calendar and
considered and acted on separately.
DECORUM: While members of the public are free to level criticism of City policies and the
action(s) or proposed action(s) of the Planning Commission or its members, members of the
public may not engage in behavior that is disruptive to the orderly conduct of the
proceedings, including, but not limited to, conduct that prevents other members of the
audience from being heard when it is their opportunity to speak, or which prevents members
of the audience from hearing or seeing the proceedings. Members of the public may not
threaten any person with physical harm or act in a manner that may reasonably be
interpreted as an imminent threat of physical harm. All persons attending the meeting are
expected to adhere to the City’s policy barring harassment based upon a person’s race,
religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital
status, gender, sexual orientation, or age. The Chief of Police, or such member or members
of the Police Department, may serve as the Sergeant-at-Arms of the Planning Commission
meeting. The Sergeant-at-Arms shall carry out all orders and instructions given by the
person who violates the order and decorum of the meeting may be placed under arrest and
such person may be prosecuted under the provisions of Penal Code Section 403 or
applicable Arcadia Municipal Code section.
5
(Arcadia Public Library) (www.ArcadiaCA.gov)
(Planning@ArcadiaCA.gov)
(City Hall, 240 W. Huntington Drive,
Arcadia, California)
“” (5)
(5)
“”
“”
403
6
STAFF REPORT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT
DATE: August 12, 2025
TO:Honorable Chairperson and Planning Commission
FROM:Lisa L. Flores, Deputy Development Services Director
By: Gary Yesayan, Associate Planner
SUBJECT:RESOLUTION NO. 2172 - APPROVING MULTIPLE FAMILY
ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW NO. MFADR 25-01 AND TENTATIVE
PARCEL MAP NO. TPM 25-03 (84859) FOR A THREE-UNIT MODERN
STYLE, MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT 33 E.
COLORADO BOULEVARD
CEQA: Exempt
Recommendation: Adopt
SUMMARY
The Applicant, Eric Tsang, on behalf of the property owner, Singa Investment LLC, is
requesting approval of Multiple Family Architectural Design Review No. MFADR 25-
01 and Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 25-03 (84859) for a three-unit Modern style,
multiple family residential development. The proposed development and subdivision
Code.
It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2172 (refer
to Attachment No. 1) and find this project Categorically Exempt under the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Section 15332, as an infill development project,
and approve MFADR 25-01 and TPM 25-03 (84859), subject to the conditions listed in
this staff report.
BACKGROUND
The subject property is a 6,450 square foot lot located midway along the north side
of E. Colorado Blvd., between N. Santa Anita Ave., and N. First Ave. The property is
7
Resolution No. 2172 / MFADR 25-01 & TPM 25-03 (84859)
33 E. Colorado St.
August 12, 2025 - Page 2 of 17
zoned R-3, High Density Multiple Family Residential with a General Plan Land Use
Designation of High Density Residential. The subject property is surrounded by R-3-
zoned properties to the west, east, and south, and R-1-zoned properties to the north.
The project site is currently developed with a single-story duplex, and a detached
three-car garage that is located at the rear of the property (refer to Attachment No.
2 for an aerial image with zoning information). Figure 1 below shows the subject site.
Based on the evaluation by an Architectural Historian, the buildings on the property
do not meet any of the minimum requirements for designation as a historical
resource under the federal, state, and local criteria. The residences are not a good
example of any architectural style and are not representative of or associated with
any important historical events or people. The structures have not been demolished
Figure 1 Subject Site at 33 E. Colorado Blvd.
8
Resolution No. 2172 / MFADR 25-01 & TPM 25-03 (84859)
33 E. Colorado St.
August 12, 2025 - Page 3 of 17
project before demolition. A Certificate of Demolition (COD) will be issued after the
project is approved.
PROPOSAL
The Applicant proposes to demolish the existing duplex and detached garage and
construct a new, three-unit, Modern style multiple family residential condominium
development with at-grade parking (refer to Attachment No. 4 for the proposed
architectural plans). Unit one will have four bedrooms and four bathrooms with a
total habitable floor area of 1,853 square feet. Units two and three will have three
bedrooms and three bathrooms with a total habitable floor area of approximately
1,600 square feet. The site will have a single point of access for ingress and egress
from Colorado Street see Figure 2 below.
Figure 2 Site Plan
The proposed development will have an overall building height of -, which is
slightly below the maximum height of - per Code. The project will also provide a
code -along with all other required side and rear
yard setbacks applicable to the R-3 zone. Along the north side, where the site abuts
a single-family (R-1) zone, a 20-foot setback will be provided, as required by the
Development Code. Each unit will include an attached two-car garage with interior
dimensions of , and a -, as
required for this lot. The development will provide one (1) guest parking space (one
per two units), along with adequate bicycle parking as required per Code.
9
Resolution No. 2172 / MFADR 25-01 & TPM 25-03 (84859)
33 E. Colorado St.
August 12, 2025 - Page 4 of 17
A total of 300 square feet of common area will be provided at the northwest corner
of the site, meeting the minimum requirement of 100 square feet per unit. The
project site contains three non-protected trees: two located in the rear yard, which
are proposed for removal, and one in the front yard, which will be preserved. A new
landscape plan is proposed, which will provide additional new trees and water
efficient landscaping throughout the site.
ANALYSIS
The R-3 zone has a minimum density of one (1) dwelling unit per 2,200 square feet
of lot area, and a maximum density of one (1) dwelling unit per 1,089 square feet of
lot area. Given the site area of 6,450 square feet, the minimum density requirement
is two (2) units, and the maximum is five (5) units. As such, the proposed three-unit
development complies with the minimum density requirement of the underlying R-
3 zone. As noted, the project will comply with the development standards of the R-3
Zone, including but not limited to setbacks, floor area limits, height, and parking.
Concurrent with the subdivision application, the Planning Commission is to approve,
conditionally approve, or deny the architectural design of the proposed project. The
project is designed in a Modern architectural style - refer to Attachment No. 4 for the
Architectural Plans, and Figure 3 below for the color rendering.
Figure 3 Color Rendering (southeast view)
10
Resolution No. 2172 / MFADR 25-01 & TPM 25-03 (84859)
33 E. Colorado St.
August 12, 2025 - Page 5 of 17
The building reflects a Modern style architecture, blending traditional and
contemporary design elements. Features such as sloped rooflines, extended gables,
and exposed downspouts to reflect common traditional features. The building also
includes minimalistic exterior treatment with simple window frames, accents to
emphasize building modulation and articulation both horizontal and vertical, a
variety of exterior textures such as wood siding, cement plaster, aluminum windows
and doors with bronze frames, and gray concrete roofing to highlight the modern
architecture. The relatively low pitch roof slope, the neutral, yet appealing color
theme allows for a well-fitting design for the neighborhood and the representation
of the Modern style architecture.
The surrounding neighborhood features numerous multiple-family developments
similar to the proposed project. The project's massing and scale will be consistent
with other nearby multiple-family residences situated along both the north and
south sides of E. Colorado Street. These include a variety of architectural styles, such
as two-story Tudor, French, and Mediterranean designs, as well as three-story Cape
Cod style condominiums.
The proposed three-story development at this site will have a maximum height of
32 -4 slightly lower than other more recently competed projects with a
-. As noted, the proposed project would remain compatible
with the general scale, mass, and bulk of existing multiple family residential
developments in the area. Additionally, the proposed development and subdivision
eneral Plan, Multiple-Family
Residential Design Guidelines, the Development Code, and the State Subdivision Map
Act.
FINDINGS
Tentative Parcel Map
The proposed subdivision complies with the subdivision regulations of the
Development Code, and the Subdivision Map Act, and the Regional Water Quality
Control Board requirements. The following findings are required for approval of the
Tentative Parcel Map:
11
Resolution No. 2172 / MFADR 25-01 & TPM 25-03 (84859)
33 E. Colorado St.
August 12, 2025 - Page 6 of 17
1. The proposed map, subdivision design, and improvements are consistent
with the General Plan, any applicable specific plan, and the Subdivisions
Division of the Development Code.
Facts in Support of the Finding: The proposed tentative parcel map for a
three-unit multiple-family residential condominium-style development and
subdivision of the airspace is in compliance with all of the provisions of the
Density Residential General Plan designation is intended to accommodate
high density, attached or detached housing types for both renter and owner
households within a neighborhood context. The R-3 zone is intended to
provide areas for a variety of medium to high density residential development,
including townhomes and condominiums. The site is physically suitable for
this type of development, and the approval of the architectural design for the
building is compatible with the scale, mass, and character with structures in
the surrounding neighborhood. The project would not adversely affect the
comprehensive General Plan and is consistent with the following General Plan
goals and policies:
Land Use and Community Design Element
Policy LU-1.1: Promote new infill and redevelopment projects that are
uses.
Policy LU-4.1: Require that new multifamily residential development be
visually and functionally integrated and consistent in scale, mass, and
character with structures in the surrounding neighborhood.
2. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of
development.
Facts in Support of the Finding: The R-3 zone has a minimum density of one
dwelling unit per 2,200 square feet of lot area, and a maximum density of one
unit per 1,089 square feet of lot area. Based on the lot area of 6,450 square
feet, a minimum of two units and a maximum of five units are allowed on this
site. The proposed three-unit multiple family development complies with the
density requirements and all other applicable zoning requirements, including
but not limited to parking, floor area limits, setbacks, height, and open space.
Therefore, the site is physically suitable for the proposed three-unit multiple
family development.
12
Resolution No. 2172 / MFADR 25-01 & TPM 25-03 (84859)
33 E. Colorado St.
August 12, 2025 - Page 7 of 17
3. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not
likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and
avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat.
Facts in Support of the Finding: The project is an infill site within an
urbanized area and does not serve as a habitat for endangered or rare species.
Therefore, the project would not cause substantial environmental damage or
impact to wildlife.
4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to
cause serious public health or safety problems.
Facts in Support of the Finding: The proposed subdivision is to subdivide the
airspace of three units for condominium purposes. The construction will be in
compliance with all applicable Building and Fire Codes to ensure public health
and safety. The proposed density will be below the maximum allowed by the
R-
development. Therefore, the development will not cause any public health or
safety problems.
5. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not
conflict with easements acquired by the public at large for access
through or use of, property within the proposed subdivision (This finding
shall apply only to easements of record or to easements established by
judgement of a court of competent jurisdiction and no authority is
hereby granted to a legislative body to determine that the public at large
has acquired easements for access through or use of property within the
proposed subdivision).
Facts in Support of the Finding: There are no known easements on the
subject property, therefore the proposed subdivision satisfies this condition.
6. The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the
community sewer system will not result in violation of existing
requirements specified by the California Regional Water Quality Control
Board.
13
Resolution No. 2172 / MFADR 25-01 & TPM 25-03 (84859)
33 E. Colorado St.
August 12, 2025 - Page 8 of 17
Facts in Support of the Finding: The Arcadia Public Works Services
adequately serve the new development, and the requirements of the
California Regional Water Quality Control Board would be satisfied.
7. The proposed design and site improvements of the subdivision conform
to the regulations of this Development Code and the regulations of any
public agency having jurisdiction by law.
Facts in Support of the Finding: The proposed design of the multi-family
development complies
standards are being met and all required site and improvements conform to
the City regulations. No public agency that has jurisdiction by law has found
that the proposed development does not conform to any of their regulations.
Architectural Design Review
The proposed development is located within the High Density Residential (R-3) Zone,
which is intended to provide a variety of medium to high density residential
development. The proposed massing, scale, and landscaping are compatible with the
other multiple family developments in the surrounding neighborhood The project
street also includes several established commercial buildings, including a Chevron
gas station and an In-N-Out drive-through restaurant located at the corner of E.
Colorado Street and N. Santa Anita Avenue, as well as the Royal Oaks liquor store at
the intersection of E. Colorado and N. First Avenue. As such, the Modern style
architecture will be fitting with the general neighborhood with the commercial as well
as other multiple-family developments. The project will be compatible with the
general scale, mass, and bulk of existing developments in the area. In addition, the
proposal will be
All City requirements regarding disabled access and facilities, occupancy limits,
building safety, health code compliance, emergency equipment, environmental
regulation compliance, and parking and site design shall be complied with by the
property owner/applicant to the satisfaction of the Building Official, City Engineer,
Deputy Development Services Director, Fire Marshal, and Public Works Services
Director, or their respective designees.
14
Resolution No. 2172 / MFADR 25-01 & TPM 25-03 (84859)
33 E. Colorado St.
August 12, 2025 - Page 9 of 17
The following findings are required for the approval of a Site Plan and Design Review
pursuant to Development Code Section 9107.19.050.F.
1. The proposed development will be in compliance with all applicable
development standards and regulation in the Development Code.
Facts in Support of the Finding: The subject site is zoned R-3, High Density
Residential Zone, which allows for at least two (2) units, and up to five (5) units.
The proposed development will not change the use or density allowed in this
zone and will meet all the development standards and regulations required,
including but not limited to setbacks, floor area limits, height, open space, and
parking. Therefore, the new development will be in compliance with all the
applicable standards and regulations in th
Multiple-Family Design Guidelines.
2. The proposed development will be consistent in the objectives and
standards of the applicable Design Guidelines.
Facts in Support of the Finding: The proposed development, in terms of the
overall mass, height, and scale of the buildings, will be consistent with the built
environment and the newer multi-
Multiple-Family Residential Design Guidelines. The Modern architectural style
will blend well with the existing multi-family residential two-story Tudor,
French, and Mediterranean designs, as well as a relatively newer three-story
Cape Cod-style condominiums. The proposed style would also blend well with
the existing commercial structures in the immediate neighborhood. The
project provides ample vertical and horizontal articulation and modulation, a
variety of exterior treatments, colors, and textures. As such, the proposed
development will be consistent with the objectives and standards of the
Multiple-Family Design Guidelines.
3. The proposed development will be compatible in terms of scale and
aesthetic design with surrounding properties and developments.
Facts in Support of the Finding: The proposed Modern style development
will be compatible with the design, as well as scale of the neighborhood since
the subject site is in a multi-family neighborhood that consists of other such
two, and three-story multi-family buildings. The project street also includes
15
Resolution No. 2172 / MFADR 25-01 & TPM 25-03 (84859)
33 E. Colorado St.
August 12, 2025 - Page 10 of 17
several established commercial buildings, including a gas station, a drive-
through restaurant, and a liquor store. The Modern style building will consist
of low-pitched roof, modulation along the upper floors, the front facade
emphasized with different materials and colors, taller windows, and wide use
of natural colors with contrasting darker trims that are typically found on other
properties within this neighborhood. The architectural design, overall
articulation, site landscaping and general project design will be well fitting
withing for the neighborhood. Therefore, this finding can be met.
4. The proposed development will have an adequate and efficient site
layout in terms of access, vehicular circulation, parking, and landscaping.
Facts in Support of the Finding: The proposed development will have a single
driveway providing ingress and egress from Colorado Blvd for all three units.
Additional pedestrian access will also be provided from Colorado Boulevard.
The proposed development will comply with the minimum requirement for
back-out, driveway widths, guest parking, and required on-site parking. The
proposed landscaping will complement the architectural design, provide
screening along the side and rear property lines, and meet the intent of the
5. The proposed development will be in compliance with all of the
applicable criteria identified in Subparagraph 9107.19.040.C.5 for
compliance with the Development Code and all other applicable City
regulations and policies, the General Plan and any appliable specific plan,
the Design Guidelines, policies and standards, and efficient site and
layout design.
Facts in Support of the Finding: The proposed development as evaluated
-3, High Density
-Family
Residential Design Guidelines as the proposed development will have an
appropriate mass, scale, and design that fits with the other structures in the
immediate vicinity. New landscaping throughout will complement the home
and provide additional screening along the rear and both sides. No major
impacts on or off-site are expected from this project. Therefore, the proposed
-Family Residential Design
Guidelines and General Plan.
16
Resolution No. 2172 / MFADR 25-01 & TPM 25-03 (84859)
33 E. Colorado St.
August 12, 2025 - Page 11 of 17
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
It has been determined that the project site is less than five (5) acres; the project site
has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; the proposed
project will not have any significant effects upon the environment, and the site can
be adequately served by all the required utilities and public services. Therefore, the
project is exempt under Class 32 (In-Fill Development Projects) pursuant to Section
15332 of the State California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (refer to
Attachment No. 5 for the Preliminary Exemption Assessment).
PUBLIC COMMENTS/NOTICE
A public hearing notice for this item was mailed to the property owners located within
300 feet of the subject property on August 1, 2025. The subject property has been
vacant since October 25, 2024 therefore no tenant notification is required. No public
comments have been received as of August 7, 2025.
The tentative parcel map was routed to all the affected agencies and services can be
provided for the proposed development without any additional or special
requirements.
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution No. 2172 and
find this project Categorically Exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA), Section 15332, as an infill development project, and approve MFADR 25-01
and TPM 25-03 (84859), subject to the following conditions of approval:
Planning
1. The project shall be developed and maintained by the Applicant/Property
Owner in a manner that is consistent with the plans submitted and conditionally
approved for MFADR 25-01 and TPM 25-03 (84859) subject to the satisfaction of
the Deputy Development Services Director, or designee.
2. Any required mechanical equipment visible from the public right-of-way shall be
screened from public view. Screening may include landscaping, solid walls or
17
Resolution No. 2172 / MFADR 25-01 & TPM 25-03 (84859)
33 E. Colorado St.
August 12, 2025 - Page 12 of 17
other methods deemed appropriate for the development. The placement and
height of said screening shall be subject to review and approval by the Deputy
Development Services Director, or designee.
Building Services
3. The project shall comply with the latest adopted edition of the following codes
as applicable:
a. California Building Code
b. California Electrical Code
c. California Mechanical Code
d. California Plumbing Code
e. California Energy Code
f. California Fire Code
g. California Green Building Standards Code
h. California Existing Building Code
i. Arcadia Municipal Code
4. The project shall comply with Chapter 35A Multiple Family Construction
Standards as amended in the Arcadia Municipal Code Section 8130.20.
5. A demolition permit shall be obtained from the Building Services Division prior
to the removal and/or demolition of structures on site.
Public Works
6. The Applicant/Property Owner shall submit Water Meter Clearance Application
Form and provide information on size of water service lateral and water meter
7. Fire protection requirements shall be provided as stipulated by the Arcadia Fire
Department and shall conform to the Arcadia Standard Plan. A separate fire
service with Double Check Detector Assembly (DCDA) shall be installed for Fire
service if required.
18
Resolution No. 2172 / MFADR 25-01 & TPM 25-03 (84859)
33 E. Colorado St.
August 12, 2025 - Page 13 of 17
8. The Applicant/Property Owner shall install a separate water service and meter
for common area landscape irrigation. A reduced pressure backflow device
shall be installed.
9. All condominiums shall require a separate water service and meter for common
area landscape irrigation.
10. A Water Meter Clearance Application shall be submitted to the Public Works
Services Department prior to permit issuance.
11. A new water service shall be installed according to the specification of the Public
Works Services Department Engineering Section. Abandonment of existing
water services, if necessary, shall be carried out by the Developer. According to
Public Works Services Department, Engineering Section specifications.
12. If any drainage fixture elevation in any building shall be lower than the elevation
of the next upstream manhole cover, an approved type of backwater valve shall
be required to be installed on the lateral behind the property line. An 8-inch
sewer main is available on S. 3rd Avenue to provide sanitary sewer service.
Development shall utilize existing sewer lateral if possible.
13. The proposed project shall be subject to low impact development (LID)
requirements. These requirements include but are not limited to using
infiltration trenches, bio-retention planter boxes, roof drains connected to a
landscaped area, pervious concrete/paver, etc.
14. Prepare and provide a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to
address construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works.
15.
(CGP).
16. New power poles are prohibited. All utility conductors, cables, conduits, and
wiring supplying electrical, cable and telephone service to a multiple family
building shall be installed underground except risers which are adjacent to and
attached to a building.
19
Resolution No. 2172 / MFADR 25-01 & TPM 25-03 (84859)
33 E. Colorado St.
August 12, 2025 - Page 14 of 17
17. If an electrical transformer is recommended/required by the Southern
California Edison to upgrade the system, it shall be placed outside of the public
right-of-way, and on private property.
18. The Property Owner/Applicant shall contact the Los Angeles County Sanitation
District (LACSD) regarding a connection fee. Project reference No. DOC 7511191.
Engineering Services
19. Prior to approval of the Final Parcel Map, the Applicant/Property Owner shall
either construct or post security for all public improvements:
a) Remove existing and construct new driveway approaches per City
Standard 801-1.
b) Remove, replace, and construct new sidewalk providing adequate path
of travel in compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and
Public Right-Of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG)
c)
to property line.
20. All dry utilities shall be undergrounded. No private conduits or structures shall
be located in the public alley without approval from the City Engineer.
21. Prior to occupancy, the developer shall repair any damages caused by the
development to the street and alley frontages from property line to property
line including but not limited to trench cuts and construction traffic, per the
moratorium list, the repair may extend from curb to curb, per the direction of
the City Engineer.
Fire Department
22. All structures shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system per the
-Family Dwelling Sprinkler
Standard.
20
Resolution No. 2172 / MFADR 25-01 & TPM 25-03 (84859)
33 E. Colorado St.
August 12, 2025 - Page 15 of 17
23. If a gate is proposed under a separate approval, a knox switch shall be provided
for Fire Department access.
General
24. The Applicant/Property Owner shall comply with all City requirements regarding
building safety, fire prevention, detection, suppression, emergency access,
public right-of-way improvements, parking, water supply and water facilities,
sewer facilities, trash reduction and recycling requirements, and National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) measures to the satisfaction of
the Building Official, Fire Marshal, Public Works Services Director, and Deputy
Development Services Director. Compliance with these requirements is to be
determined by having fully detailed construction plans submitted for plan check
review and approval by the foregoing City officials and employees.
25. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Applicant must defend, indemnify,
and hold the City, any departments, agencies, divisions, boards, and/or
commissions of the City, and its elected officials, officers, contractors serving as
City officials, agents, e
harmless from liability for damages and/or claims, actions, or proceedings for
damages for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage,
and with respect to all other actions and liabilities for damages caused or
with this Multiple Family Architectural Design Review No. MFADR 25-01 and
Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 25- site, and
which may arise from the direct or indirect operations of the Applicant or those
construction of the Project. This indemnity provision applies to all damages and
claims, actions, or proceedings for damages, as described above, regardless of
whether the City prepared, supplied, or approved the plans, specifications, or
other documents for the Project.
In the event of any legal action challenging the validity, applicability, or
interpretation of any provision of this approval, or any other supporting
document relating to the Project, the City will notify the Applicant of the claim,
action, or proceedings and will cooperate in the defense of the matter. The
Applicant must indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Indemnitees, and each
21
Resolution No. 2172 / MFADR 25-01 & TPM 25-03 (84859)
33 E. Colorado St.
August 12, 2025 - Page 16 of 17
of them, with respect to all liability, costs and expenses incurred by, and/or
awarded against, the City or any of the Indemnitees in relation to such action.
provide to the City a cash deposit to cover legal fees, costs, and expenses
incurred by City in connection with defense of any legal action in an initial
amount to be reasonably determined by the City Attorney. The City may draw
funds from the deposit for such fees, costs, and expenses. Within 5 business
days of each and every notice from City that the deposit has fallen below the
initial amount, Applicant shall replenish the deposit each and every time in order
shall only refund
to the Developer any unexpended funds from the deposit within 30 days of: (i)
a final, non-appealable decision by a court of competent jurisdiction resolving
the legal action; or (ii) full and complete settlement of legal action. The City shall
have the right to select legal counsel of its choice. The parties hereby agree to
cooperate in defending such action. The City will not voluntarily assist in any
such third-party challenge(s). In consideration for approval of the Project, this
condition shall remain in effect if the entitlement(s) related to this Project is
rescinded or revoked, at the request of the Applicant or not.
26. Approval of MFADR 25-01 and TPM 25-03 (84859) shall not be in effect unless
the Property Owner and Applicant have executed and filed the Acceptance Form
with the City on or before 30 calendar days after the Planning Commission has
adopted the Resolution. The executed Acceptance Form submitted to the
Development Services Department is to indicate awareness and acceptance of
the conditions of approval.
Planning Commission Action
Approval
If the Planning Commission intends to approve this project, the Commission should
move to approve Multiple Family Architectural Design Review No. MFADR 25-01 and
Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 25-03 (84859), state that the proposal satisfies the
requisite findings, and adopt the attached Resolution No. 2172 that incorporates the
requisite environmental and subdivision findings, and the conditions of approval as
presented in this staff report, or as modified by the Commission.
22
Resolution No. 2172 / MFADR 25-01 & TPM 25-03 (84859)
33 E. Colorado St.
August 12, 2025 - Page 17 of 17
Denial
If the Planning Commission is to deny this project, the Commission should state the
specific findings that the proposal does not satisfy based on the evidence presented
with specific reasons for denial, and move to deny Multiple Family Architectural
Design Review No. MFADR 25-01 and/or Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 25-03 (84859)
and direct staff to prepare a resolution for adoption at the next meeting that
If any Planning Commissioner, or other interested party has questions or comments
regarding this matter prior to the August 12, 2025, Planning Commission hearing,
please contact Associate Planner, Gary Yesayan at (626) 574-5422, or by email at
gyesayan@ArcadiaCA.gov
Approved:
Lisa L. Flores
Deputy Development Services Director
Attachment No. 1: Resolution No. 2172
Attachment No. 2: Aerial image with zoning information and site photos
Attachment No. 3: Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 25-03 (84859)
Attachment No. 4: Architectural Plans
Attachment No. 5: Preliminary Exemption Assessment
23
Attachment No. 1
Attachment No. 1
Resolution No. 2172
24
RESOLUTION NO. 2172
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF
ARCADIA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING MULTIPLE FAMILY ARCHITECTURAL
DESIGN REVIEW NO. MFADR 25-01 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO.
TPM 25-03 (84859) FOR A THREE-UNIT MODERN STYLE, MULTIPLE
FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AT 33 E. COLORADO BOULEVARD
WHEREAS, applications for Multiple Family Architectural Design Review No.
MFADR 25-01 and Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 25-03 (84859) were filed by Eric
Tsang on behalf of the property owner, Singa Investment LLC, for a three-unit
multiple family residential condominium development and a tentative parcel map
for the subdivision of the airspace at 33 E. Colorado Blvd., (collectively, “Project”); and
WHEREAS, on June 6, 2025, Planning Services completed an environmental
assessment for the Project in accordance with the California Environmental Quality
Act (“CEQA”), and recommended that the Planning Commission determine the
Project is exempt under CEQA per Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines, as it
qualifies as an in-fill development project; and
WHEREAS, on August 12, 2025, a duly-noticed public hearing was held before
the Planning Commission on said Project, at which time all interested persons were
given full opportunity to be heard and to present evidence.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ARCADIA
HEREBY RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. The factual data submitted by the Community Development
Division in the staff report dated August 12, 2025, are true and correct.
25
2
SECTION 2. This Commission finds, based upon the entire record:
Tentative Parcel Map
1. The proposed map, subdivision design, and improvements are
consistent with the General Plan, any applicable specific plan, and the Subdivisions
Division of the Development Code:
FACT: The proposed tentative parcel map for a three-unit multiple-family
residential condominium-style development and subdivision of the airspace is in
compliance with all of the provisions of the City’s General Plan, Development Code,
and the Subdivision Map Act. The High Density Residential General Plan designation
is intended to accommodate high density, attached or detached housing types for
both renter and owner households within a neighborhood context. The R-3 zone is
intended to provide areas for a variety of medium to high density residential
development, including townhomes and condominiums. The site is physically
suitable for this type of development, and the approval of the architectural design
for the building is compatible with the scale, mass, and character with structures in
the surrounding neighborhood. The project would not adversely affect the
comprehensive General Plan and is consistent with the following General Plan goals
and policies:
Land Use and Community Design Element
26
3
Policy LU-1.1: Promote new infill and redevelopment projects that are
consistent with the City’s land use and compatible with surrounding
existing uses.
Policy LU-4.1: Require that new multifamily residential development be
visually and functionally integrated and consistent in scale, mass, and
character with structures in the surrounding neighborhood.
2. The site is physically suitable for the type and proposed density of
development:
FACT: The R-3 zone has a minimum density of one dwelling unit per 2,200
square feet of lot area, and a maximum density of one unit per 1,089 square feet of
lot area. Based on the lot area of 6,450 square feet, a minimum of two units and a
maximum of five units are allowed on this site. The proposed three-unit multiple
family development complies with the density requirements and all other applicable
zoning requirements, including but not limited to parking, floor area limits, setbacks,
height, and open space. Therefore, the site is physically suitable for the proposed
three-unit multiple family development.
3. The design of the subdivision and the proposed improvements are not
likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably
injure fish or wildlife or their habitat:
27
4
FACT: The project is an infill site within an urbanized area and does not serve
as a habitat for endangered or rare species. Therefore, the project would not cause
substantial environmental damage or impact to wildlife.
4. The design of the subdivision or type of improvements is not likely to
cause serious public health or safety problems:
FACT: The proposed subdivision is to subdivide the airspace of three units for
condominium purposes. The construction will be in compliance with all applicable
Building and Fire Codes to ensure public health and safety. The proposed density will
be below the maximum allowed by the R-3 zone and the City’s existing infrastructure
will adequately serve the new development. Therefore, the development will not
cause any public health or safety problems.
5. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict
with easements acquired by the public at large for access through or use of, property
within the proposed subdivision (This finding shall apply only to easements of record
or to easements established by judgement of a court of competent jurisdiction and
no authority is hereby granted to a legislate body to determine that the public at
large has acquired easements for access through or use of property within the
proposed subdivision):
FACT: There are no known easements on the subject property, therefore the
proposed subdivision satisfies this condition.
28
5
6. The discharge of sewage from the proposed subdivision into the
community sewer system will not result in violation of existing requirements
specified by the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.
FACT: The Arcadia Public Works Services Department determined that the
City’s existing infrastructure would adequately serve the new development, and the
requirements of the California Regional Water Quality Control Board would be
satisfied.
7. The proposed design and site improvements of the subdivision conform
to the regulations of this Development Code and the regulations of any public agency
having jurisdiction by law.
FACT: The proposed design of the multi-family development complies with the
City’s Development Code, as all development standards are being met and all
required site and improvements conform to the City regulations. No public agency
that has jurisdiction by law has found that the proposed development does not
conform to any of their regulations.
Architectural Design Review
8. The proposed development will be in compliance with all applicable
development standards and regulation in the Development Code.
FACT: The subject site is zoned R-3, High Density Residential Zone, which
allows for at least two (2) units, and up to five (5) units. The proposed development
will not change the use or density allowed in this zone and will meet all the
29
6
development standards and regulations required, including but not limited to
setbacks, floor area limits, height, open space, and parking. Therefore, the new
development will be in compliance with all the applicable standards and regulations
in the Development Code, and the City’s Multiple-Family Design Guidelines.
9. The proposed development will be consistent with the objectives and
standards of the applicable Design Guidelines.
FACT: The proposed development, in terms of the overall mass, height, and
scale of the buildings, will be consistent with the built environment and the newer
multi-family condominiums and with the City’s Multiple-Family Residential Design
Guidelines. The Modern architectural style will blend well with the existing multi-
family residential two-story Tudor, French, and Mediterranean designs, as well as a
relatively newer three-story Cape Cod-style condominiums. The proposed style
would also blend well with the existing commercial structures in the immediate
neighborhood. The project provides ample vertical and horizontal articulation and
modulation along all sides, including additional stepped massing at the third-floor
level to further alleviate visual bulk and mass. As such, the proposed development
will be consistent with the objectives and standards of the Multiple-Family Design
Guidelines.
10. The proposed development will be compatible in terms of scale and
aesthetic design with surrounding properties and developments.
30
7
FACT: The proposed Modern style development will be compatible with the
design, as well as scale of the neighborhood since the subject site is in a multi-family
neighborhood that consists of other such two, and three-story multi-family buildings.
The project street also includes several established commercial buildings, including
Chevron gas station, In-N-Out drive-through restaurant, and a liquor store. The
Modern style building will consist of low-pitched roof, modulation along the upper
floors, the front facade emphasized with different materials and colors, taller
windows, and wide use of natural colors with contrasting darker trims that are
typically found on other properties within this neighborhood. The architectural
design, overall articulation, site landscaping and general project design will be well
fitting withing for the neighborhood. Therefore, this finding can be met.
11. The proposed development will have an adequate and efficient site layout
in terms of access, vehicular circulation, parking, and landscaping.
FACT: The proposed development will have a single driveway providing ingress
and egress from Colorado Blvd for all three units. Additional pedestrian access will
also be provided from Colorado Boulevard. The proposed development will comply
with the minimum requirement for back-out, driveway widths, guest parking, and
required on-site parking. The proposed landscaping will complement the
architectural design, provide screening along the side and rear property lines, and
meet the intent of the City’s Multiple Family Design Guidelines.
31
8
12. The proposed development will be in compliance with all of the applicable
criteria identified in Subparagraph 9107.19.040.C.5 for compliance with the
Development Code and all other applicable City regulations and policies, the General
Plan and any appliable specific plan, the Design Guidelines, policies and standards,
and efficient site and layout design.
FACT: The proposed development as evaluated complies with all the City’s
development standards in the R-3, High Density Residential zone. The project is in
compliance with the City’s Multiple-Family Residential Design Guidelines as the
proposed development will have an appropriate mass, scale, and design that fits with
the other structures in the immediate vicinity. New landscaping throughout will
complement the home and provide additional screening along the rear and both
sides. No major impacts on or off-site are expected from this project. Therefore, the
proposed home will be consistent with the City’s Multiple-Family Residential Design
Guidelines and General Plan.
SECTION 3. Pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality
Act (“CEQA”), this Project is a Class 32 Categorical Exemption as an infill-development
project per Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines.
SECTION 4. For the foregoing reasons, the Planning Commission
determines that the Project is Categorically Exempt under the California
Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”) pursuant to Section 15332, Class 32, and hereby
approves Multiple Family Architectural Design Review No. MFADR 25-01 and
32
9
Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 25-03 (84859) for a three-unit multiple-family
residential condominium development at 33 E. Colorado Blvd, subject to the
conditions of approval attached hereto.
SECTION 5.The Secretary shall certify to the adoption of this Resolution.
Passed, approved and adopted this 12th day of August, 2025.
Marilynne Wilander
Chair, Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Lisa L. Flores
Secretary
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Michael J. Maurer
City Attorney
33
10
Page Intentionally Left Blank
34
11
RESOLUTION NO. 2172
Conditions of Approval
Planning
1. The project shall be developed and maintained by the Applicant/Property
Owner in a manner that is consistent with the plans submitted and conditionally
approved for MFADR 25-01 and TPM 25-03 (84859) subject to the satisfaction of
the Deputy Development Services Director, or designee.
2. Any required mechanical equipment visible from the public right-of-way shall be
screened from public view. Screening may include landscaping, solid walls or
other methods deemed appropriate for the development. The placement and
height of said screening shall be subject to review and approval by the Deputy
Development Services Director, or designee.
Building Services
3. The project shall comply with the latest adopted edition of the following codes
as applicable:
a. California Building Code
b. California Electrical Code
c. California Mechanical Code
d. California Plumbing Code
e. California Energy Code
f. California Fire Code
g. California Green Building Standards Code
h. California Existing Building Code
i. Arcadia Municipal Code
4. The project shall comply with Chapter 35A Multiple Family Construction
Standards as amended in the Arcadia Municipal Code Section 8130.20.
5. A demolition permit shall be obtained from the Building Services Division prior
to the removal and/or demolition of structures on site.
35
12
Public Works
6. The Applicant/Property Owner shall submit Water Meter Clearance Application
Form and provide information on size of water service lateral and water meter
to the City’s Public Works Department.
7. Fire protection requirements shall be provided as stipulated by the Arcadia Fire
Department and shall conform to the Arcadia Standard Plan. A separate fire
service with Double Check Detector Assembly (DCDA) shall be installed for Fire
service if required.
8. The Applicant/Property Owner shall install a separate water service and meter
for common area landscape irrigation. A reduced pressure backflow device
shall be installed.
9. All condominiums shall require a separate water service and meter for common
area landscape irrigation.
10. A Water Meter Clearance Application shall be submitted to the Public Works
Services Department prior to permit issuance.
11. A new water service shall be installed according to the specification of the Public
Works Services Department Engineering Section. Abandonment of existing
water services, if necessary, shall be carried out by the Developer. According to
Public Works Services Department, Engineering Section specifications.
12. If any drainage fixture elevation in any building shall be lower than the elevation
of the next upstream manhole cover, an approved type of backwater valve shall
be required to be installed on the lateral behind the property line. An 8-inch VCP
sewer main is available on Colorado Blvd. to provide sanitary sewer service. The
project shall utilize existing sewer lateral(s) if possible.
13. The proposed project shall be subject to low impact development (LID)
requirements. These requirements include but are not limited to using
infiltration trenches, bio-retention planter boxes, roof drains connected to a
landscaped area, pervious concrete/paver, etc.
14. Prepare and provide a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) to
address construction Best Management Practices (BMPs) to be reviewed and
approved by the Department of Public Works.
36
13
15. Coverage shall be obtained under the State’s Construction General Permit
(CGP).
16. New power poles are prohibited. All utility conductors, cables, conduits, and
wiring supplying electrical, cable and telephone service to a multiple family
building shall be installed underground except risers which are adjacent to and
attached to a building.
17. If an electrical transformer is recommended/required by the Southern
California Edison to upgrade the system, it shall be placed outside of the public
right-of-way, and on private property.
18. The Property Owner/Applicant shall contact the Los Angeles County Sanitation
District (LACSD) regarding a connection fee. Project reference No. DOC 7511191.
Engineering Services
19. Prior to approval of the Final Parcel Map, the Applicant/Property Owner shall
either construct or post security for all public improvements:
a) Remove existing and construct new driveway approaches per City
Standard 801-1.
b) Remove, replace, and construct new sidewalk providing adequate path
of travel in compliance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and
Public Right-Of-Way Accessibility Guidelines (PROWAG)
c) Remove and replace curb and gutter with 2’ slot cut from property line
to property line.
20. All dry utilities shall be relocated underground. No private conduits or structures
shall be located in the public alley without approval from the City Engineer.
21. Prior to occupancy, the developer shall repair any damages caused by the
development to the street and alley frontages from property line to property
line including but not limited to trench cuts and construction traffic, per the
direction of the City Engineer. If the street is under the City’s pavement
moratorium list, the repair may extend from curb to curb, per the direction of
the City Engineer.
37
14
Fire Department
22. All structures shall be provided with an automatic fire sprinkler system per the
City of Arcadia Fire Department’s Single & Multi-Family Dwelling Sprinkler
Standard.
23. All gates shall provide a knox switch for Fire Department access.
General
24. The Applicant/Property Owner shall comply with all City requirements regarding
building safety, fire prevention, detection, suppression, emergency access,
public right-of-way improvements, parking, water supply and water facilities,
sewer facilities, trash reduction and recycling requirements, and National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) measures to the satisfaction of
the Building Official, Fire Marshal, Public Works Services Director, and Deputy
Development Services Director. Compliance with these requirements is to be
determined by having fully detailed construction plans submitted for plan check
review and approval by the foregoing City officials and employees.
25. To the maximum extent permitted by law, Applicant must defend, indemnify,
and hold the City, any departments, agencies, divisions, boards, and/or
commissions of the City, and its elected officials, officers, contractors serving as
City officials, agents, employees, and attorneys of the City (“Indemnitees”)
harmless from liability for damages and/or claims, actions, or proceedings for
damages for personal injuries, including death, and claims for property damage,
and with respect to all other actions and liabilities for damages caused or
alleged to have been caused by reason of the Applicant’s activities in connection
with this Multiple Family Architectural Design Review No. MFADR 25-01 and
Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 25-03 (84859) (“Project”) on the Project site, and
which may arise from the direct or indirect operations of the Applicant or those
of the Applicant’s contractors, agents, tenants, employees or any other persons
acting on Applicant’s behalf, which relate to the development and/or
construction of the Project. This indemnity provision applies to all damages and
claims, actions, or proceedings for damages, as described above, regardless of
whether the City prepared, supplied, or approved the plans, specifications, or
other documents for the Project.
In the event of any legal action challenging the validity, applicability, or
interpretation of any provision of this approval, or any other supporting
document relating to the Project, the City will notify the Applicant of the claim,
38
15
action, or proceedings and will cooperate in the defense of the matter. The
Applicant must indemnify, defend and hold harmless the Indemnitees, and each
of them, with respect to all liability, costs and expenses incurred by, and/or
awarded against, the City or any of the Indemnitees in relation to such action.
Within 15 days’ notice from the City of any such action, the Applicant shall
provide to the City a cash deposit to cover legal fees, costs, and expenses
incurred by City in connection with defense of any legal action in an initial
amount to be reasonably determined by the City Attorney. The City may draw
funds from the deposit for such fees, costs, and expenses. Within 5 business
days of each and every notice from City that the deposit has fallen below the
initial amount, Applicant shall replenish the deposit each and every time in order
for City’s legal team to continue working on the matter. The City shall only refund
to the Developer any unexpended funds from the deposit within 30 days of: (i)
a final, non-appealable decision by a court of competent jurisdiction resolving
the legal action; or (ii) full and complete settlement of legal action. The City shall
have the right to select legal counsel of its choice. The parties hereby agree to
cooperate in defending such action. The City will not voluntarily assist in any
such third-party challenge(s). In consideration for approval of the Project, this
condition shall remain in effect if the entitlement(s) related to this Project is
rescinded or revoked, at the request of the Applicant or not.
26. Approval of MFADR 25-01 and TPM 25-03 (84859) shall not be in effect unless
the Property Owner and Applicant have executed and filed the Acceptance Form
with the City on or before 30 calendar days after the Planning Commission has
adopted the Resolution. The executed Acceptance Form submitted to the
Development Services Department is to indicate awareness and acceptance of
the conditions of approval.
---
39
Attachment No. 2
Attachment No. 2
Aerial Photo with Zoning Information &
Photos of the Subject Site
40
Overlays
Selected parcel highlighted
Parcel location within City of Arcadia
N/A
Property Owner(s):
Lot Area (sq ft):
Year Built:
Main Structure / Unit (sq. ft.):
R-3
Number of Units:
HDR
Property Characteristics
1940
1,329
2
Property Owner
Site Address:33 E COLORADO BLVD
Parcel Number: 5773-001-027
N/A
Zoning:
General Plan:
N/A
Downtown Overlay:
Downtown Parking Overlay:
Architectural Design Overlay:N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Residential Flex Overlay:
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Special Height Overlay:
N/A
Parking Overlay:
Racetrack Event Overlay:
This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for
reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current,
or otherwise reliable.
Report generated 29-Jul-2025
Page 1 of 1 41
42
43
44
45
Attachment No. 3
Attachment No. 3
Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 25-03
(84859)
46
47
Attachment No. 4
Attachment No. 4
Architectural Plans
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
Attachment No. 5
Attachment No. 5
Preliminary Exemption Assessment
55
Preliminary Exemption Assessment
1.Name or description of
project:
Multiple Family Architectural Design Review No. MFADR 25-0 1
and Tentative Parcel Map No. TPM 25-03 (84859) -A tentative
parcel map and design review for a three-unit residential
condominium development with a Categorical Exemption under the
2.Project Location 33 E. Colorado Blvd., (between N. Santa Anita Ave & N. 1st Ave.)
3.Entity or person undertaking
project:
A.
B.Other (Private)
(1)Name Singa Investment LLC
(2)Address 1613 Chelsea Rd. # 928,
San Marino, CA 91108
4.Staff Determination:
accordance with the Lead Agency's "Local Guidelines for Implementing the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)" has concluded that this project does not require further
environmental assessment because:
a.The proposed action does not constitute a project under CEQA.
b.The project is a Ministerial Project.
c.The project is an Emergency Project.
d.The project constitutes a feasibility or planning study.
e.The project is categorically exempt.
Applicable Exemption
Class:
15332 Class 32 (Infill Development)
f.The project is statutorily exempt.
Applicable Exemption:
g.The project is otherwise
exempt on the following
basis:
h.The project involves another public agency which constitutes the Lead Agency.
Name of Lead Agency:
Date: June 6, 2025 Staff: Gary Yesayan, Associate Planner
56
ARCADIA PLANNING COMMISSION
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
TUESDAY, JULY 22, 2025
Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda will be made
available for public inspection in the City’s Planning Services Office located at 240 W. Huntington Drive, Arcadia, California,
during normal business hours.
CALL TO ORDER Vice Chair Tallerico called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
ROLL CALL
PRESENT: Vice Chair Tallerico, Arvizu, and Hui
ABSENT: Chair Wilander and Commissioner Tsoi
It was moved by Commissioner Arvizu and seconded by Commissioner Hui to excuse Chair Wilander
and Commissioner Tsoi from the meeting.
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION FROM STAFF REGARDING AGENDA ITEMS
There were none.
PUBLIC COMMENTS (5 minute time limit per person)
There were none.
PUBLIC HEARING
1. Resolution No. 2171 – Approving Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 25-04, thereby amending
CUP 00-15, to allow additional live entertainment uses and a change in entertainment hours at
Astronaut City Bar, located at 1037 S. Baldwin Avenue
CEQA: Exempt
Recommendation: Adopt
Applicant:Teresa Lo
MOTION - PUBLIC HEARING
Vice Chair Tallerico introduced the item, and Senior Planner Edwin Arreola presented the staff
report.
Commissioner Hui asked about the change in business ownership, the type of entertainment
proposed, whether a schedule of activities would be maintained, and if a security guard would be
on duty daily.
Mr. Arreola confirmed that the business has a new owner, separate from Host Bar. He stated that
karaoke will continue, with additional entertainment such as comedy and magic acts, and that
performances will rotate regularly. He also confirmed that a security guard will be on duty at all
times.
Commissioner Arvizu asked about the types and hours of operation of the neighboring
businesses.
57
2 7/22/2025
Mr. Arreola stated that a dry cleaner is located to the north and a beauty salon to the south. He
added that these businesses typically close between 5:00 p.m. and 6:00 p.m., and none remain
open later than 7:00 p.m.
Commissioner Arvizu inquired about how the business owner will monitor interior noise levels to
prevent impacts on neighboring businesses. He also asked about the maximum allowed decibel
level, where it is measured from, and what mitigation measures will be taken to reduce potential
noise impacts.
Mr. Arreola responded that the business owner will monitor noise using an internal sound system,
and that the noise level is measured from the property line not the shared wall. He stated the
maximum allowable level is 50 decibels after 10:00 p.m. and noted that since the rear wall is not
on the property line, neighboring businesses may experience higher decibel readings.
Deputy Development Services Director Lisa Flores stated that the Applicant proposes to
soundproof the walls, and they will use an app to monitor the noise levels from inside the building.
Commissioner Arvizu thanked Ms. Flores for the information and said that he has additional
questions for the Applicant.
Vice Chair Tallerico asked if any comments were received during the public comment period and
inquired whether the musical act will be a soloist.
Mr. Arreola confirmed that no comments were received and that the musical act will be an acoustic
musician, most likely performing solo.
The public hearing was opened.
Teresa Lo introduced herself as the Applicant and business owner who is taking over the existing
bar. She said she was available for questions.
Commissioner Arvizu asked if she had consulted a sound specialist to soundproof the bar.
Ms. Lo stated she was planning to hire a consultant. However, she clarified that her hours of
operation will begin at 7:00 p.m. after the neighboring businesses have closed.
Commissioner Arvizu was pleased to learn that the other businesses will not be impacted, and he
had no further questions.
Commissioner Hui asked about the current status of the bar, the reason for taking over the
business, whether entertainers will be hired, and if food or snacks will be sold.
Ms. Lo replied that she is unsure if the bar is currently open, explained her vision to create a
comedy club and entertainment space by purchasing Host Bar, confirmed she will hire a rotating
mix of entertainers, and stated she plans to sell only packaged snacks through a vending
machine.
There were no speakers present.
Commissioner Arvizu made a motion to close the public hearing.
Commissioner Hui seconded the motion.
58
3 7/22/2025
Without objection, the motion was approved.
DISCUSSION
Commissioner Arvizu stated his primary concern was potential noise impacts from the proposal
but was pleased to learn that the bar will operate in the evening after neighboring businesses
have closed.
Commissioner Hui was in favor of the proposed use and said it was nice to have a comedy venue
in Arcadia.
Vice Chair Tallerico concurred with the Commission.
MOTION
It was moved by Commissioner Arvizu, seconded by Commissioner Hui to adopt Resolution No.
2171 approving Conditional Use Permit No. CUP 25-04, thereby amending CUP 00-15, to allow
additional live entertainment uses and a change in entertainment hours at Astronaut City Bar,
located at 1037 S. Baldwin Avenue in which the findings were made.
ROLL CALL
AYES: Vice Chair Tallerico, Commissioner Arvizu, and Hui
NOES: None
ABSENT: Chair Wilander and Commissioner Tsoi
There is a ten (10) day appeal period. Appeals are to be filed by 4:30 p.m. on Friday, August 1, 2025.
CONSENT CALENDAR
1. Minutes of the July 8, 2025, Regular Meeting of the Planning Commission
Recommendation: Approve
Vice Chair Tallerico requested that the July 8, 2025, Minutes be amended reflect that
Commissioner Hui expressed support for expanding the Planning Commissioners’ role, as
discussed.
Ms. Flores stated that, after reviewing the audio recording before the hearing, staff
confirmed that Commissioner Hui did not make that statement.
Assistant City Attorney Mr. Martz stated that since the July 8 Minutes are accurate as written, if
Commissioner Hui wishes to change her decision, it can be reflected in the minutes of this
meeting.
Vice Chair Tallerico and Commissioner Hui agreed.
59
4 7/22/2025
Vice Chair Tallerico stated he will attend the next City Council meeting to express support for
expanding the Planning Commission’s duties beyond land use. He will draft a summary of his
remarks and send them to Ms. Flores and Assistant City Attorney Kellan Martz prior to the
meeting.
Commissioner Arvizu motioned to approve the minutes and seconded by Commissioner Hui.
ROLL CALL
AYES: Vice Chair Tallerico, Commissioners Arvizu, and Hui
NOES: None
ABSENT: Chair Wilander and Commissioner Tsoi
The motion was approved.
MATTERS FROM CITY COUNCIL LIAISON
City Council Member Wang invited the Commission to attend the Concerts in the Park events held on
Thursday afternoons through July 31.
MATTERS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSONERS
Commissioner Hui invited the Commission to attend the Arcadia Performing Arts Foundation and their
upcoming events.
MATTERS FROM ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY
There were none.
MATTERS FROM STAFF INCLUDING UPCOMING AGENDA ITEMS
Ms. Flores reported on two new State laws, AB 130 and SB 131, that will affect the environmental review
process of housing and big developments.
Ms. Flores also reported on SB 1123 allows up to 10 homes to be built on a single vacant lot zoned for
single-family housing as long as the lot is 1.5 acres or less without going through a formal map process.
Ms. Flores informed the Commission that the next Planning Commission meeting is scheduled for August
12 and will include reorganization and approval of the minutes. The Historic Preservation Commission
will meet afterward with one agenda item: a Mills Act application for the Brod-Papp House located at
1203 Oakwood Drive.
Commissioner Hui asked if a summary of the new State laws could be provided to the Commissioners.
Ms. Flores responded affirmatively, stating that more information and relevant links will be shared with
them.
60
5 7/22/2025
ADJOURNMENT
The Planning Commission adjourned the meeting at 7:43 p.m., to Tuesday, August 12, 2025, at 7:00
p.m. in the City Council Chamber.
Chair Wilander, Planning Commission
ATTEST:
Lisa L. Flores
Secretary, Planning Commission
61