HomeMy WebLinkAbout2506 Florence Ave25-11
11/05/2025
11/17/2025
N/A
5:30
$21508/27/25 EDGE
No protected tree shall be removed without
a Tree Removal Permit.
REC-21899-25
MAJOR AM -4- 7/24
AFFIDAVIT
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
CITY OF ARCADIA
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
I, hereby certify that the
(print name)
attached list contains the names and addresses of all persons to whom all property is
assessed as they appear on the latest available equalized assessment roll of the
County of Los Angeles, within the area described on the attached application and
for the required distance of notification from the exterior boundaries of the property
described on the attached application. I also certify that the subject site described
on the attached application contains no illegal lot splits or other divisions of land not
specifically authorized by the City of Arcadia.
I certify under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
Signature:
Date:
Kenny Yu
6-15-25
10/1/25 (Z:\Archive\Riverside\PROPOSAL\CULTURAL\Arcadia\Demolition Program\2506 Florence Ave\Evaluation Update-2506 Florence Ave.docx)
CARLSBAD
CLOVIS
IRVINE
LOS ANGELES
PALM SPRINGS
POINT RICHMOND
RIVERSIDE
ROSEVILLE
SAN LUIS OBISPO
1500 Iowa Avenue, Suite 200, Riverside, California 92507 951.781.9310 www.lsa.net
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
October 30, 2025
Kenny Yu, Property Manager
Casey Tibbet, M.A., Associate Cultural Resources Manager/Architectural Historian
Historic Resources Evaluation Update for 2506 Florence Avenue in the City of
Arcadia, Los Angeles County, California
LSA prepared this memorandum to update a historical significance evaluation that was completed
for the property at 2506 Florence Avenue in the City of Arcadia, Los Angeles County, California, in
2018.
Background
In 2018, Jeanette A. McKenna (McKenna) completed a historical evaluation of the property at 2506
Florence Avenue (Assessor Identification Number 5787-013-009) in Arcadia (Attachment A). In
support of this effort, McKenna conducted research and an intensive-level field survey. The evaluation
was documented on Department of Parks and Recreation (DPR) forms and evaluated using the criteria
for listing in the California Register of Historical Resources (California Register). As a result of
McKenna’s evaluation, the property was determined ineligible for listing in the California Register and
was assigned a California Historical Resources status code of 6Z (Found ineligible for NR, CR, or Local
designation through survey evaluation). McKenna recommended to the City of Arcadia (City) that the
property is not a “historical resource” as defined by the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
It is LSA’s understanding that the 2018 evaluation and recommendation were provided to and
accepted by the City.
Since McKenna’s evaluation, the City has adopted its own criteria for evaluating historical significance.
The City’s first four criteria are identical to the California Register criteria and, therefore, were
essentially addressed by the McKenna evaluation. However, to complete the evaluation, the property
must also be evaluated under the City’s Criteria 5 and 6. Criterion 5 requires that the property be
listed in the National Register of Historic Places and/or California Register. Criterion 6 requires that
the property be iconic.
LSA has been asked to update the 2018 evaluation by addressing these two criteria in a cover
memorandum.
10/1/25 (Z:\Archive\Riverside\PROPOSAL\CULTURAL\Arcadia\Demolition Program\2506 Florence Ave\Evaluation Update-2506 Florence Ave.docx) 2
Evaluation Update
To address the City’s Criteria 5 and 6, LSA reviewed the California Office of Historic Preservation’s Built
Environment Resource Directory (BERD), the National Register of Historic Places (National Register)
database, and the National Register weekly lists to determine whether the property was previously
evaluated as eligible for listing in the National Register or California Register (Criterion 5). To address
Criterion 6, LSA conducted various online searches to determine if the property has been extensively
photographed or otherwise publicly documented in a manner that would make it a highly
recognizable Arcadia property. The evaluations under these criteria are provided below.
Criterion 5 – Is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and/or California Register of
Historical Resources. The online BERD, National Register database (current through 2012), and the
National Register weekly lists from 2013 through the present, were searched, but no listings for this
property were found (National Park Service n.d.a and n.d.b; California Office of Historic Preservation
2022). It is not significant under this criterion.
Criterion 6 – Is an iconic property. According to the City’s ordinance, iconic means a property that
“exhibits the City’s unique character, history, or identity and/or has been visited and photographed
so often by residents and visitors to the city that it has become inextricably associated with Arcadia”
(9103.17.160 Definitions). Online searches did not find any indication that this residence has been
visited or photographed to the extent that it meets the City’s definition of an iconic property. The
residence is similar to many others in the area and does not exhibit the City’s unique character,
history, or identity. It is not significant under this criterion.
Recommendation
Based on the 2018 evaluation by McKenna and this evaluation update, the property at 2506 Florence
Avenue does not qualify as a “historical resource” as defined by the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA) and the 6Z status code remains appropriate. For purposes of this project, the City may
make a finding of “no impact” regarding built environment historical resources.
References
California Office of Historic Preservation (OHP)
2022 Built Environment Resource Directory for Los Angeles County. Accessed online in October
2025 at: https://ohp.parks.ca.gov/?page_id=30338
National Park Service
n.d.a National Register Database and Research. Accessed online in October 2025 at:
https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/weekly-list.htm
n.d.b Weekly Lists Previous Years. Accessed online in October 2025 at:
https://www.nps.gov/subjects/nationalregister/weekly-lists-previous-years.htm
Attachment: DPR Forms
DPR 523A (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
PRIMARY RECORD
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Other Listings:
Review Code: 6Z Reviewer: Jeanette A. McKenna Date: 2/10/25
Page 1 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California
P1. Other Identifier: APN 5787-013-009
*P2. Location Not for Publication X Unrestricted
*P2a. County: Los Angeles
P2b. USGS 7.5’ Quad: El Monte Date: 1994 T 1S ; R 11W; S ½ of SE ¼ of Sec. 5 ; S.B.B.M.
P2c. Address: 2506 Florence Avenue City: Arcadia Zip: 91007
P2d. UTMs: NAD 83 Zone: 11 403098 mE 3774796 mN
P2e. Other Locational Data: (e.g.: parcel #, directions to resource, elevation, etc., as appropriate)
East of Baldwin Avenue, north of Las Tunas Drive; east side of Florence Avenue, between Woodruff
Avenue and Los Altos Avenue (second lot from corner of Los Altos Avenue and Florence Avenue)
*P3a. Description: (Describe resource and its major elements. Include design, materials, condition, alterations, size,
setting, and boundaries.) See Continuation Sheet.
P3b. Resource Attributes: (List attributes and codes.) HP-2 (Single Family Residence)
*P4. Resources Present:□Building □Structure □Object X Site
□District □Element of District □Others (Isolate, etc.)
P5a. Photo or Drawing (Photo Required for Buildings, Structures, and Objects.)
P5b: Description of Photo:
South Elevation (ESE); 2/8/25
*P6. Date of Construction/Age
X Historic □ Prehistoric □ Both
*P7. Owner and Address:
Yuk Wu
5917 Oak Avenue
Temple City, California 91780
*P8. Recorded by:
Jeanette McKenna
6008 Friends Avenue
Whittier, California 90601
*P9. Date Recorded: Feb. 10, 2025
*P10. Survey Type: Archit. Assess.
*P11. Report Citation: (Cite survey report and other sources, or enter “None.”) McKenna, Jeanette A. (2025) – An
Architectural Assessment of the Residential Property at 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California
91007. On file, McKenna et al., Whittier, California.
*Attachments □ NONE X Location Map X Sketch Map X Continuation Sheet X BSO Record
□Archaeological Record □District Record □Linear Feature Record □Milling Station Record
□Rock Art Record □Artifact Record □Photographic Record X Other (List): Photos
DPR 523K (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
SKETCH MAP
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 2 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, CA
Drawn by: Jeanette A. McKenna, McKenna et al., Whittier, California *Date Feb. 10, 2025
DPR 523J (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
LOCATION MAP
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 3 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California
*Map Name: USGS El Monte Quadrangle *Scale 1:24,000 *Date of Map 1994
DPR 523B (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
Primary #
HRI #
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Page 4 of 81 *NRHP Status Code 6Z
*Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California (Main Residence)
B1. Historic Name: George and Lily Heron Residence
B2. Common Name: Not Applicable
B3. Original Use: Residential B4. Present Use: Residential
*B5. Architectural Style: Eclectic Tudor Style
*B6. Construction History: (Construction Date, Alterations, and dates of Alterations)
See Continuation Sheet.
*B7. Moved?X No □Yes □Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: Detached garage; shed addition to east elevation of garage; second residence to
rear of property; modern shed in northeast corner of property; driveway on north side of property.
See Continuation Sheet for additional details.
B9a. Architect: Unknown B9b. Builder: Unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Area: City of Arcadia, Los Angeles County
Period of Significance: 1927(+) Property Type: Residential Applicable Criteria: NONE
(Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic
scope. Also address integrity.)
This property represents a post-WWI residence with improvements indicative of the Post-World War
II period (second residence) and the expansion of residential developments in the western portion
of the City of Arcadia. This particular area was annexed into the City by 1926, but not covered by the
Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps (the last dating to 1932). Various periods of development are
represented in this area, with corresponding variations in architectural designs. The development
periods are representative of the population growth and need for affordable housing in the LA
suburbs, especially areas in the San Gabriel Valley. This growth was accompanied by the redefining
of some property lines. Overall, this area of Arcadia was developed as a middle-lower class
community for working class families.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List Attributes and Codes) None
*B12. References: McKenna (2025)
B13. Remarks: Likely to be demolished and
Redeveloped in the near future
(Sketch map with North Arrow Required)
*B14. Evaluator: Jeanette A. McKenna
*Date of Evaluation: Feb. 10, 2025
(This space reserved for official comments)
DPR 523B (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
Primary #
HRI #
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Page 5 of 81 *NRHP Status Code 6Z
*Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California (2nd Residence)
B1. Historic Name: David A. Shadid Residence
B2. Common Name: Not Applicable
B3. Original Use: Residential B4. Present Use: Residential
*B5. Architectural Style: Minimal Traditional (Shed Roof)
*B6. Construction History: (Construction Date, Alterations, and dates of Alterations)
See Continuation Sheet.
*B7. Moved?X No □Yes □Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: Detached garage; shed addition to east elevation of garage; main residence to
west of this residence; modern shed in northeast corner of property; driveway on north side of
property. See Continuation Sheet for additional details.
B9a. Architect: Unknown B9b. Builder: Unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Area: City of Arcadia, Los Angeles County
Period of Significance: 1949(+) Property Type: Residential Applicable Criteria: NONE
(Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic
scope. Also address integrity.)
This improvement represents a simple post-WWII residential improvement indicative of the Post-
World War II period need for housing and supplemental income to established residential properties.
This small residence represents the expansion of residential developments in the western portion of
the City of Arcadia. This particular area was annexed into the City by 1926, but not covered by the
Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps (the last dating to 1932). Various periods of development are
represented in this area, with corresponding variations in architectural designs. The development
periods are representative of the population growth and need for affordable housing in the LA
suburbs, especially areas in the San Gabriel Valley. This growth was accompanied by the redefining
of some property lines. Overall, this area of Arcadia was developed as a middle-lower class
community for working class families.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List Attributes and Codes) None
*B12. References: McKenna (2025)
B13. Remarks: Likely to be demolished and
Redeveloped in the near future
(Sketch map with North Arrow Required)
*B14. Evaluator: Jeanette A. McKenna
*Date of Evaluation: Feb. 10, 2025
(This space reserved for official comments)
DPR 523B (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
Primary #
HRI #
BUILDING, STRUCTURE, AND OBJECT RECORD
Page 6 of 81 *NRHP Status Code 6Z
*Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California (Garage w/Shed)
B1. Historic Name: George and Lily Heron and David A. Shadid Property
B2. Common Name: Not Applicable
B3. Original Use: Ancillary B4. Present Use: Ancillary/Recreational
*B5. Architectural Style: Eclectic Tudor (Garage) and Utilitarian (Shed)
*B6. Construction History: (Construction Date, Alterations, and dates of Alterations)
See Continuation Sheet.
*B7. Moved?X No □Yes □Unknown Date: Original Location:
*B8. Related Features: Main residence to south of garage; driveway on north side of property; modern shed
in northeast corner of property; 2nd residence to south/southeast of garage
. See Continuation Sheet for additional details.
B9a. Architect: Unknown B9b. Builder: Unknown
*B10. Significance: Theme: Residential Area: City of Arcadia, Los Angeles County
Period of Significance: 1927-47 Property Type: Residential Applicable Criteria: NONE
(Discuss importance in terms of historical or architectural context as defined by theme, period, and geographic
scope. Also address integrity.)
This improvement represents an ancillary addition to the property (garage; 1927) with a later (1947)
addition to the east elevation (shed/rec room). Both amenities represent improvements to the
property following WWI and WWII, as deemed reasonable by the respective owners. The garage
complemented the original residence and the rec room was designed to provide additional play area
for the later occupants. These improvements represent the expansion of residential developments
in the western portion of the City of Arcadia. This particular area was annexed into the City by 1926,
but not covered by the Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps (the last dating to 1932). Various periods of
development are represented in this area, with corresponding variations in architectural designs.
The development periods are representative of the population growth and need for affordable
housing in the LA suburbs, especially areas in the San Gabriel Valley. This growth was accompanied
by the redefining of some property lines. Overall, this area of Arcadia was developed as a middle-
lower class community for working class families.
B11. Additional Resource Attributes: (List Attributes and Codes) None
*B12. References: McKenna (2025)
B13. Remarks: Likely to be demolished and
Redeveloped in the near future
(Sketch map with North Arrow Required)
*B14. Evaluator: Jeanette A. McKenna
*Date of Evaluation: Feb. 10, 2025
(This space reserved for official comments)
DPR 523L (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 7 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California
Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date Feb. 10, 2025 X Continuation Update
DP
R
5
2
3
L
(
1
/
1
3
)
*
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
St
a
t
e
o
f
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
O
F
P
A
R
K
S
A
N
D
R
E
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CO
N
T
I
N
U
A
T
I
O
N
S
H
E
E
T
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
#
HR
I
#
Tr
i
n
o
m
i
a
l
Pa
g
e
8 of
81
*R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
N
a
m
e
o
r
#
(
a
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
b
y
r
e
c
o
r
d
e
r
)
25
0
6
F
l
o
r
e
n
c
e
Av
e
n
u
e
,
A
r
c
a
d
i
a
,
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
Re
c
o
r
d
e
d
b
y
:
Je
a
n
e
t
t
e
A
.
M
c
K
e
n
n
a
*D
a
t
e
Fe
b
.
1
0
,
2
0
25
X
Co
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n
Up
d
a
t
e
DP
R
5
2
3
L
(
1
/
1
3
)
*
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
St
a
t
e
o
f
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
O
F
P
A
R
K
S
A
N
D
R
E
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CO
N
T
I
N
U
A
T
I
O
N
S
H
E
E
T
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
#
HR
I
#
Tr
i
n
o
m
i
a
l
Pag
e
9 of
81
*R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
N
a
m
e
o
r
#
(
a
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
b
y
r
e
c
o
r
d
e
r
)
25
0
6
F
l
o
r
e
n
c
e
Av
e
n
u
e
,
A
r
c
a
d
i
a
,
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
Re
c
o
r
d
e
d
b
y
:
Je
a
n
e
t
t
e
A
.
M
c
K
e
n
n
a
*D
a
t
e
Fe
b
.
1
0
,
2
0
25
X
Co
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n
Up
d
a
t
e
DP
R
5
2
3
L
(
1
/
1
3
)
*
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
St
a
t
e
o
f
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
O
F
P
A
R
K
S
A
N
D
R
E
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CO
N
T
I
N
U
A
T
I
O
N
S
H
E
E
T
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
#
HR
I
#
Tr
i
n
o
m
i
a
l
Pa
g
e
10
of
81
*R
e
s
o
u
r
c
e
N
a
m
e
o
r
#
(
a
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
b
y
r
e
c
o
r
d
e
r
)
25
0
6
F
l
o
r
e
n
c
e
Av
e
n
u
e
,
A
r
c
a
d
i
a
,
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
Re
c
o
r
d
e
d
b
y
:
Je
a
n
e
t
t
e
A
.
M
c
K
e
n
n
a
*D
a
t
e
Fe
b
.
10
,
20
25
X
Co
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n
Up
d
a
t
e
DPR 523K (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
SKETCH MAP
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 11 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, CA
Drawn by: Jeanette A. McKenna, McKenna et al., Whittier, California *Date Feb. 10, 2025
DPR 523K (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
SKETCH MAP
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 12 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, CA
Drawn by: Jeanette A. McKenna, McKenna et al., Whittier, California *Date Feb. 10, 2025
Tract No. 9610 (1926)
DPR 523K (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
SKETCH MAP
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 13 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, CA
Drawn by: Jeanette A. McKenna, McKenna et al., Whittier, California *Date Feb. 10, 2025
Tract No. 27276 (1967)
DPR 523K (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
SKETCH MAP
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 14 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, CA
Drawn by: Jeanette A. McKenna, McKenna et al., Whittier, California *Date Feb. 10, 2025
Parcel Map 373 (1968)
DPR 523L (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 15 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California
Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date Feb. 10, 2025 X Continuation Update
The property at 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, Los Angeles County, is cross-referenced as As-
sessor Parcel No. 5787-013-009 and is located on the east side of S. Baldwin Avenue, north of
Las Tunas Avenue and on the east side of Florence Avenue, between Woodruff Avenue and Los
Altos Avenue. This property is described by the County Assessor as consisting of “… Tract No
9610 S 5 ft of Lot 8 and all of Lot 9.”
A review of the County maps confirmed the area to be within the historic anta Anita Rancho (of
Henry Dalton, pre-1858) and, eventually, purchased by Elias J. Baldwin. With the subdivision of
the rancho, the project area was equated with the southeast quarter of Section 5 (T1S; R11W).
In 1891, the E.J. Baldwin mapped “Addition No. 1 to Santa Anita Colony, which incorporated the
current project area. More specifically, the property identified as 2506 Florence Avenue is within
Lot 15 of this subdivision with the western boundary of Lot 15 being the future alignment of Flor-
ence Avenue. The identified lots were available for sale after 1891, but sold slowly and were
developed relatively late (post-1910). Lot 15 consisted of 11.71 acres.
In 1926, the owners of much of Lots 14 and 15, the California Trust Company, filed a subdivision
map (Tract No. 9610). This map depicts 19 lots with 11 lots on the east side of Florence Avenue
and another 8 lots on the west side. The map extended from Palm Drive (north) to Woodruff
Avenue (south). Most lots averaged 80 feet (north/south) by 210 feet (east/west). Los Altos
Avenue was not included on this map.
The first identified owners of the property now identified as 2506 Florence Avenue were George
and Lily Heron, who purchased the property in ca. 1926-27 and immediately initiated the con-
struction of their residence. It is noted, data suggests the Herons owned multiple properties,
including, but not necessarily limited to, Lots 8 through 11. Aerial photographs confirmed the
alignment of Los Altos Avenue (north of Lot 8) was not completed until after 1968 – likely in the
early 1970s. The property associated with Lot 10 was developed in citrus. The Heron residence
was constructed between the orchard (Lot 10; south) and the open area of Lot 8 (north). The
residence was on Lot 9 and, eventually, additional residences were constructed along the Wood-
ruff Avenue alignment (Lot 11).
Research identified George (1884-1966) and Lily Heron as natives of Scotland who immigrated
around 1920. Their five year old daughter, Lillien E. Heron accompanied them. In 1925, shortly
before purchasing the Arcadia property, the Herons were living in Los Angeles. George Heron
was identified as a poultry farmer and Lily Heron was identified as a teacher. Shortly after pur-
chasing the property and construction of the residence and garage, Heron erected chicken coops
DPR 523L (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 16 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California
Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date Feb. 10, 2025 X Continuation Update
(likely erected on Lot 9). The Herons remained at 2506 Florence Avenue until at least 1945, when
the property was sold to David A. Shadid. George Heron died in 1966 and it appears none of the
Herons were in the immediate area after 1966.
When the Herons developed 2506 Florence Avenue, the improvements were limited to the main
residence, the garage, and the landscaping. The orchard was developed to the south and the
chicken coops noted. No other building records were filed.
David A. Shadid (1888-1960) purchased the property at 2506 Florence Avenue in 1946 and, be-
tween 1946 and 1949, completed additional improvements. His land consisted of Lot 9, only. It
was not until ca. 1968 the southern 5 feet of Lot 8 was incorporated into Lot 9, allowing vehicular
access to the rear yard of the property from Florence Avenue. Prior to the Shadid ownership,
Heron would access the rear of the property from his ownership/access to Lot 8.
Shadid was an immigrant from Syria that arrived in Southern California after spending years in
Illinois with his extended family. Research identified Shadid as working in a “shoe shop” (shoe
repairman) in Arcadia; married to Della, and having two children (Leroy and Mildred). He immi-
grated in 1902, was an Arabic speaker, and was eventually naturalized as a U.S. citizen. His wife
and children were already U.S. citizens, by birth.
Shadid is credited with a “remodel” of the garage in 1946 and the construction/remodel of the
“rumpus room” (1947). McKenna et al. suggests the “rumpus room” was originally the Heron
chicken coop(s) and Shadid enclosed the structure for use as a “rec room” or “rumpus room.”
Later, this same structure was remodeled to serve as a second residence (2506 ½ Florence Av-
enue).
The ramshackle addition to the rear of the garage was likely for storage of use as a chicken house
or gardening shed. The presence of a second residence (the eventual 2506 ½ Florence Avenue)
indicates the Assessor’s references to a “single family residential property” is inaccurate. Shortly
before his death in 1960, Shadid actually moved to 2506 ½ Florence Avenue (1959) – indicating
it was a stand-alone residence – and the occupants of the main house were unidentified, but likely
the C.L. Harmon family.
After the death (1960) of David Shadid, the property changed hands a number of times, including,
but not limited to, the following:
DPR 523L (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 17 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California
Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date Feb. 10, 2025 X Continuation Update
pre-1963-68+/- C.L. Harmon
ca. 1968+ E.B. Wooley
pre-1979-94+/- Walter Prucha*
* = it is noted that the Prucha family once lived at 2511 Florence Avenue (opposite 2506 Florence
Avenue. The earlier structure has been demolished and replaced with a 2015 modern residence.
Permits show that the post-1963 ownership periods were associated with the addition of A/C units
mounted in the walls (1963) of the two residences; re-roofing of the houses and garages (1968);
alterations and electrical work at the main entry (1979); and another phase of re-roofing in 1994.
Since 1994, there have been no significant “permitted” changes to the property.
The City of Arcadia completed a historic resources survey in 2016. A resource map summarizing
the findings denotes the sometime preliminary status of individual properties and, in the case of
2506 Florence Avenue, the property was referenced as “not evaluated.” In contrast, however, the
detailed historic context statement (ARG 2016) listing of properties identified this particular prop-
erty as locally significant with a rating of 5S3 (not a part of a district). The basis of the designation
appears to be the identification of the improvements as “Tudor Revival” dating to the 1920s and
in relatively good and original condition.
McKenna et al. completed background research and a field visit to the property to document the
current conditions and “reassess” the designation presented in ca. 2016. The following findings
are presented.
Upon identifying the property at 2506 Florence Avenue, McKenna et al. confirmed the presence
of five structures: the main residence (1927); the original garage (1927); the chicken coop/rec
room/rumpus room (1949); the ramshackle shed attached to the garage (n.d.); and the modern
storage shed (n.d.).
As a modern addition to the property, the storage shed was not considered part of the early de-
velopments and not historically significant. It is a temporary structure that is not on a fixed foun-
dation. It is, however, resting on a broken concrete pad that appears to have been the base of
an earlier structure – possibly an additional chicken coop (associated with George Heron).
DPR 523L (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 18 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California
Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date Feb. 10, 2025 X Continuation Update
A gate located on the north side of the garage was constructed on the southerly 5 feet of Lot 8
and the northern 5 feet of Lot 9. The present of this gate confirms the property line, as adjusted,
and likely dates to the post-Heron period – possibly the post-Shadid period. Either way, access
was made available to the north of the garage, as the location of the garage would have otherwise
prohibited vehicular or easy access to the rear yard.
The driveway leading to the garage from Florence Avenue is asphalt and continues from the direct
alignment to the garage to wrapping around the north side of the garage (to the gated entry). As
such, this asphalt replaced to original dirt driveway and, possibly, a narrow concrete driveway. It
would technically be considered a modern addition to the property. A narrow gate is located on
the southwest corner of the garage, providing pedestrian access to the center of the property.
Overall, the property, as now defined, is bounded by the gates and chain link fencing on the
western side and cinderblock walls to the north, east, and south. The front yard is not fenced and
consists of an expanse of grass, a large, mature evergreen tree, and modest landscaping (bushes
and flowers). There is a concrete walkway extending from the driveway to the main entrance,
forming an arch through the front yard. The walk connects to a concrete stoop at the main en-
trance (west elevation), that rises to a small covered porch.
The 1926 residence is on a raised concrete foundation and exhibits an irregular floor plan that,
according to the County Assessor, consists of two bedrooms and one bath (1,252 square feet of
living space). This design would have accommodated the Heron family (two parents and one
child). The Assessor also lists the date of construction as 1930. However, building records on
file with the City of Arcadia show construction was initiated in 1926 and essentially completed in
1927-28. As such, the Herons completed their initial improvements just prior to the crash of the
stock market and the onset of the Great Depression.
As currently built, the Heron residence is irregularly shaped with a rectangular core area, a small
extension on the northwest former and a larger extension on the northeast corner. The cross-
gable roof line(s) follow north/south and east/west orientations with the east/west trending roofline
dominating the northern portion of the residence and the north/south trending roof lines dominat-
ing the rectangular core. A differentiating height in the roof line on the northern portion of the
structure suggests the eastern extension may have been an addition to the original structure and,
therefore, accounting for the 1930 date referenced by the County. If so, the original structure
would have been “L” shaped with three faux dormers on the west (main) elevation, two roof peaks
DPR 523L (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 19 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California
Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date Feb. 10, 2025 X Continuation Update
on the south elevation, and a single roof line peak on the north elevation. A fourth peak is present
on the east elevation (addition).
As noted in the permits, this residence was re-roofed at least twice since the original construction.
When built, the roof was likely covered in wooden shake or slate tile shingles. Since 1968, the
residence has been covered with composition shingles, resulting in a flatter roof. The high peaks
of the existing roof lines were designed to suggest height and, possibly, the illusion the residence
was a two story structure. However, the attic vents and the lack of windows in the faux dormers
confirm the attic was never designed as or for living space. All useable space was on the single,
main floor. The west elevation (facing Florence Avenue) is an elongated expanse with a central-
ized entrance under a small covered porch (under a central peak). The main entrance is recessed
and the covered porch exhibits west and south facing open arches. The southern arch includes
a low wrought iron railing to prevent falls (no stoop on this side).
The west facing arch is similar, but associated with the four-step concrete stoop. A third arch is
tucked beneath the porch and also facing south. However, this arch is on the north side of the
porch and, while once accommodating another entry, has been closed into a solid wall. Scarring
on this short wall suggests the entire wall was redesigned. It has also been reported the railings
at the porch and stoop are a more recent addition (not part of the original design).
To the south of the main entrance is a large, fixed window flanked by two, relatively tall casement
windows (6:2 panes) and three slightly arched sets of corresponding panes above. These are
wood framed and original to the design. To the north of the main entrance, there is a series of
three, relatively tall casement windows (5:2), also wood framed and original to the residence. This
particular area would have been access via the now-sealed entrance on the front porch, indicating
use of this corner of the residence as a small office or den (or possibly a dining room) with a
private entrance. Three similar windows are present on the north elevation of this corner, com-
plementing the design.
The north elevation also exhibits a single, high peaked roof line and the east/west trending roof
line that continues east of the office/den. Here, a wall mounted A/C unit is present (added in ca.
1963). Further east are two square, wood framed Louver windows. These windows are located
in the area associated with the kitchen and would have originally been double hung sash windows.
These replacement of the windows likely took place in the late 1940s or 1950s, when David
Shadid was completing numerous alterations to the property.
DPR 523L (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 20 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California
Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date Feb. 10, 2025 X Continuation Update
East of these Louver windows, the construction design is more complicated. The rear door (which
enters at the service porch/kitchen area, appears to be associated with the original design of the
residence and with a small extension covered by an east/west trending cross-gable roofline similar
to that seen at the office/den. However, in the area above the door and the three windows east
of the door (one square sash window and two tall casement windows), the roof line rises and the
northern wall extends slightly to the north. The side porch was noticeably extended to the east,
resulting in a wider stoop.
McKenna et al. suggests this ell is a ca. 1930 addition that incorporated the original design into
the larger addition, requiring the relocation of the rear door and square window into the newly
established northern wall and the placement of additional windows similar to those placed within
the original design. This construction resulted in the addition of a ½ bath (at the location of the
sash window) and another bedroom to the rear of the residence – making the residence a three
bedroom and 1 ½ bath residence. The widening of this portion of the residence may have been
designed around the size of the desired room addition and/or the desire to maintain the pitch of
the roof. In either case, the addition would be attributed to George Heron, it complements the
original design (materials and placement), and would likely have been an immediate addition (be-
tween 1927 and 1930 construction period), rendering it essentially original to the design. It is also
highly likely the same contractor completed the addition.
The east elevation (not visible from the street) is fairly flat, although “L” shaped, exhibits very
shallow eaves, and no doors. There are six windows, including one large wood framed window
on the northern addition consisting of paired casement windows (5:2) that differ slightly from the
other casement windows. In this case, the two portions meet in the center, while the other case-
ment windows stand alone, separated by narrow wall segments. This window is tentative asso-
ciated with a third bedroom.
To the south of the addition, two smaller and individual casement windows (3:2) are located in an
area associated with one of the original bedrooms. A small, bathroom window is to the south of
these small casement windows and, to the south of the bathroom window, there are two, individual
and tall casement windows similar to others in the residence (5:2). All are wood framed and
considered original to the residence.
The south elevation is the smallest of the four sides, consisting of a flat expanse and exhibiting
two roof line peaks (oriented north/south) one window below the eastern peak and two under the
western peak. Between the two windows on the western side of the elevation, a tall chimney ex-
DPR 523L (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 21 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California
Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date Feb. 10, 2025 X Continuation Update
tending above the peak is present. This chimney and flanking windows confirm the presence of
the living room in the southwestern portion of the residence. All windows are casement, similar
to those on the remainder of the residence.
The entire original residence has been resurfaced with slightly textured stucco. This has resulted
in the loss of some relief between the original walls and the corresponding doors and window
frames. The original finish may have been rougher and exhibiting a paddle application rather than
the flatter modern stucco finish (which is generally sprayed onto the building).
Although referenced as a “Tudor Revival” structure, McKenna et al. would redefine this residence
as an eclectic form of a Tudor, as it lacks the exposed cross beams that generally stand out on a
Tudor design and it is a single story structure rather than the typical multi-story structure.
The historic context statement prepared by ARG (2016) described the standard design elements
of a Tudor Revival structure:
“The Tudor Revival style was loosely based on a variety of Medieval English build-
ing traditions, ranging from thatched‐roof Tudor cottages to grandiose Elizabethan
and Jacobean manor houses. The first Tudor Revival‐style houses appeared in
the United States at the end of the nineteenth century. These houses were typically
elaborate and architect‐designed. Much like the Spanish Colonial Revival style,
Tudor Revival architecture became extremely popular during the 1920s population
boom in Southern California. 1920s and 1930s masonry veneering techniques
helped to further disseminate the style, as even modest houses could afford to
mimic the brick and stone exteriors of traditional English designs.127 Tudor Re-
vival architecture is characterized by its asymmetry, steeply pitched gabled roofs,
decorative half‐timbering, and prominent chimneys. High style examples are typi-
cally two to three stories in height and may exhibit leaded glass diamond‐paned
windows and slate roof shingles. The popularity of the Tudor Revival style waned
during the Great Depression as less ornate building designs prevailed. Although
the style continued to be used through the 1930s, later interpretations of Tudor
Revival architecture were much simpler in terms of form and design. The Tudor
Revival style was a common architectural mode in Arcadia’s residential areas
south of Huntington Drive in the 1920s and early 1930s, and neighborhoods north
of Foothill Boulevard in the late 1930s and 1940s. Tudor Revival residences north
DPR 523L (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 22 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California
Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date Feb. 10, 2025 X Continuation Update
of Foothill Boulevard often feature sprawling, one‐story volumes, influenced by the
later Ranch style.
Character‐defining features of Tudor Revival architecture include:
Irregular massing and asymmetrical façades
Steeply pitched gabled roofs with a prominent front ‐facing gable and
slate, wood shingle, or composition shingle roof cladding
Rolled, pointed, and/or flared eaves, sometimes with exposed rafters
Brick, stone, or stucco wall cladding
Decorative half‐timbering
Prominent chimneys
Entrance vestibules with arched openings
Multi‐paned casement windows that are tall, narrow, and typically
arranged in group
In reviewing the residence at 2506 Florence Avenue, McKenna et al. noted the following charac-
teristics:
Irregular massing and asymmetrical façades
Steeply pitched gabled roofs with a prominent front ‐facing gable(s)
Stucco wall cladding
Semi-prominent chimney
Entrance vestibules with arched openings
Multi‐paned casement windows that are tall, narrow, and typically arranged
in group
Despite meeting six of the eight characteristics presented by AEG, this residence is considered
“eclectic” because the dominating characteristics of exposed cross beams, paddled stucco siding,
and the presence of stone and/or brick are missing. It would not be unusual for Heron, a native
of Scotland, to want a residence with design elements indicative of Great Britain (i.e. Tudor), but
with limited means (a poultry farmer), he opted for some basic design elements while limiting the
costs of materials and more elaborate design. With the exception of the high r oof peaks and
DPR 523L (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 23 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California
Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date Feb. 10, 2025 X Continuation Update
some window designs, this structure could also be considered an eclectic Spanish Revival design.
As such, it appears Heron combined some elements of the Tudor Revival period with some addi-
tional elements of the Spanish Revival period, thereby reflecting both his Scottish roots and his
presence in an area of Southern California that also had strong ties to Hispanic culture.
The garage at 2506 Florence Avenue was original built by Heron, but permits show Shadid re-
modeled the garage in ca. 1946 and 1947. The extent of this remodeling was not defined in the
permits, but likely involved standard upgrading and possibly interior changes. In any case, at the
time of this investigation, it was evident the roof had been replaced at least twice, the surface was
redone with modern stucco, and the original bay doors (2) were replaced with plywood replicas
and spring actions. A secondary entrance to the garage is located on the east elevation, but the
majority of the east elevation has been obscured by the later construction of the poorly built “shed”
that appears to represent once of the chicken coops. Another door and sash window are located
on the south elevation.
The area to the south of the garage has been paved with asphalt, but the area east fo the garage
exhibits an expanse of concrete that extends from the east wall of the garage to the rear property
boundary. Variations in the concrete indicate differing pours, the older segments being at the
garage and rear of the yard and the more recent expanses in between. There are no markings
in this concrete, but it appears the easternmost portion is the eldest, followed by the portion adja-
cent to the garage. Both of these may be associated with Shadid. The central portion, which is
more modern, can be tentatively attributed to the post-1963 period (modern, by definition).
While maintaining the size and orientation of the garage, and acknowledging the garage does still
complement the residential improvements, McKenna et al. has determined that the existing gar-
age is more of a replica (or renovated) garage and not representative of the original garage, as
the exterior materials have all been replaced. In addition, the replacement of the original driveway
design with the asphalt pavement has changed the original approach to the garage and impacted
the setting.
As noted, a “ramshackle” shed has been added to the east side of the garage. This wood framed
and wood sided structure is small, exhibits a shed roof design, and the siding consists of both
vertical and horizontal planking indicative of salvaged wood. The north elevation has a single
window – double hung sash with eared panes (1:1) and scarring to suggest another window was
sealed. McKenna et al. suggests, in aligning the side boards, the original window was moved
from the sealed area to the present position, indicating this elevation always had only one window.
DPR 523L (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 24 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California
Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date Feb. 10, 2025 X Continuation Update
This double hung sash window was likely salvaged from the original residence (where the Louver
windows are now present).
The west elevation of the shed is adjacent to the garage and was not accessible for visual inspec-
tion. However, it is likely there is no west wall, but only the original east wall of the garage. The
east elevation exhibits one solid panel access door and another salvaged double hung sash win-
dow (1:1). Both are located in the southern portion of the elevation. The east elevation also
shows the shed roof listing to the north (the southern side being higher and nearer the door). This
would permit clearance for the salvaged door.
The east elevation also exhibits vertical planks designed to frame the window. These salvaged
boards were not long enough to allow for horizontal placement. It is also noted, the window on
the east elevation has fixed panes (1:1), and is not consistent with the sash windows noted else-
where.
The south elevation of the shed faces the rear yard area and the converted second residence.
Here, another solid door and fixed window (2:3) are present. It is possible the window was de-
signed to be upright, but turned to accommodate the design of the shed. Again, the siding has
been installed vertically to accommodate the placement of the window and, likely, because only
short boards were available.
Overall, McKenna et al. does not consider this a significant historical resource. It likely dates to
the Shadid ownership (1946-1959), but is not a substantial structure, is constructed of salvaged
materials, and is in very poor condition.
The second residence on the property, 2506 ½ Florence Avenue, is not recognized by the County
Assessor. It appears to date to ca. 1947, after Shadid took possession of the property, references
to “remodel” of the “rumpus room” suggests Shadid purchased the property with an existing struc-
ture (likely the chicken coop built by Heron) and converted it into a more substantial closed struc-
ture to be used as a play room. The roof and supports were already present, but the original was
likely only partially enclosed. It is quite possible the wood removed from this structure was used
to built the shed adjacent to the garage.
At the time these improvements were made, the structure became a simple, rectangular structure
with a shed roof (sloping from west to east) with the main entrance facing west. A second en-
trance was established on the north wall. By 1949, Sahdid completed additional improvements,
DPR 523L (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 25 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California
Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date Feb. 10, 2025 X Continuation Update
including connecting the structure to the sewage system (cess pool), indicating the possible shift
from a play room into detached living quarters (no reported kitchen, but otherwise, livable). Sahdid
moved into this residence in 1959, indicating it was self-supporting prior to his death in 1960.
At the time of this investigation, the second residence was found to consist of a rectangular struc-
ture on a concrete pad; exhibiting a shed roof design with rolled composition shingles; wood fram-
ing; stucco siding, and two entranced. A wall mounted A/C unit (dating to ca. 1963) is present on
the south elevation. The south elevation is flat and also exhibits two matching double hung sash
(1:1) windows with no ears. The A/C unit is mounted between the windows.
The south elevation is flat with wide eaves and exposed rafters. There are two (different sized)
double hung sash windows (1:1) with no ears, indicating they post-date the 1930s. A water heater
is present on the south elevation – extending away from the residence – and a cap believed to
cover the cesspool access is located to the northeast of the residence.
The north elevation is flat with wide eaves and exhibits the secondary entrance under a small
covered porch and the utility meters are mounted to the east of this doorway. A concrete path
leads from this doorway to the larger expanse between the garage and residence.
The main elevation is to the west, facing the original residence. However, a chain link fence with
foliage separates the two residences, providing privacy and some level of security (the rear yard
is fenced separately from the main house and garage). Here, the entry is under another small,
covered porch and there are windows flanking the entry. The door and windows provide a sym-
metrical design to the west elevation and the windows are fixed, single panes capped by awnings
to deflect from the western setting sun.
Overall, the second residence on this property represents at least three phases of construction:
1) as a chicken coop; 2) as a rumpus room/play room; and 3) as a small, second self-sustaining
residence. The assignment of the second address does not appear until ca. 1959, when David
A. Shadid occupied the building.
Evaluation
In evaluating this property for historical significance, McKenna et al. applied the criteria presented
in CEQA, as amended, but also considered the local Arcadia criteria, which essentially defers to
the CEQA criteria.
DPR 523L (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 26 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California
Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date Feb. 10, 2025 X Continuation Update
Per CEQA, a property is significant if it can be:
A.Associated with a significant event, or
B.Associated with a significant person, or
C.Is representative of significant architecture or an association
with an architect or contractor of note, or
D.Has the potential to provide significant scientific data
(i.e. archaeological or paleontological)
Research and field investigations failed to associate this property or its improvement with any
significant events or persons in history. Further, research and field investigations failed to provide
information to suggest the property will yield any significant scientific data. With respect to archi-
tecture, there are five standing structures on the property: the main residence (1926-1930); the
garage (1926-1930); the shed (likely late 1940s/early 1950s); the second residence (three phases
of construction); and the modern shed in the rear yard. Of these, McKenna et al has determined
the modern shed and the “ramshackle” shed are not historically significant. In addition, the garage
has been subjected to significant alterations/modification and, including new roofs, new doors,
and new siding, rendering it ineligible for recognition as a historic element to the property. It is
essentially as replacement structure, save in interior framing.
The residence at 2506 ½ Florence Avenue is the result of significant alterations from the original
construction in the late 1920s to the conversion to a rumpus room and residence in the 1940s and
1950s. As a result, the structure is now a simple, minimal traditional residential structure with no
unique materials, design elements, or other important traits. It is not considered historically sig-
nificant under CEQA and would not qualify for listing.
The original 1926-1930 residence attributed to George and Lily Heron was constructed by the
couple as a two bedroom/1 bath house and, almost immediately, enlarged to a three bedroom
and 1 ½ bath residence. The residence that now exists on the property is indicative of the 1930
completion of the rear addition and, therefore, still meets the age criterion for historical review.
At noted above, the property has not been associated with any significant event in history, person
in history, nor does it show the potential to yield scientifically important data. With respect to
Criterion C, the property main residence is a 1930 eclectic Tudor Revival architectural style, as
opposed to a true Tudor Revival. It has traits that are consistent with the Tudor Revival period
DPR 523L (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 27 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California
Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date Feb. 10, 2025 X Continuation Update
and design, but is also missing some significant traits (e.g. the exposed diagonal beams). None-
theless, the association with the Tudor Revival period is acknowledged.
A significant component in determining the architectural significance of a structure is to show the
structure maintains its architectural integrity. In this case, the residence at 2506 Florence Avenue
appears, from the street, to maintain integrity of the 1930 construction. However, closer exami-
nation has shows the majority of the original windows are present, but in poor condition. The front
entry exhibits two of the original arches (one open and one associated with the main doorway),
but a third arch has been closed, resulting in the loss of another entrance. Rails have been added
to the stoop (not original to the property) and the concrete walkway appears to be a more recent
addition.
The roof has been replaced at least twice, resulting in the loss of original materials. Likewise, the
entire structure has been resurfaced with modern stucco, resulting in the loss of the original rough
paddle finish generally associated with Tudor designs. There is also a loss of some relief between
the walls and wood framed windows and doors. In addition to the characteristics presented, it is
also noted that this is a single story residential property. Most Tudor Revival properties are multi-
storied and larger than the Heron residence. It is not the best or one of the best examples of this
architectural style.
As noted, there was no evidence this structure had the distinctive diagonal cross beams and, with
the newer stucco surface, the residence is more “tan/brown” in color than the “whiter” or “paler”
surface indicative of Tudor designs. This same stucco surface covers the tall chimney on the
south elevation, resulting in a loss of a more distinct presence. The original chimney design may
have been red brick, which is also more often attributed to Tudor Revival architecture.
The north elevation shows window replacement, an enlargement of the stoop, the addition of
railing, and, with the adjacent asphalt driveway, a loss of the original view from the residence.
Although somewhat minor, these changes are evident from the street and do effect the integrity
of the property.
In summary, and like the garage, the main residence no longer exhibits its original roof materials,
the original siding, there is a closed doorway on the front entrance, a few windows have been
altered, the side porch has been altered, and the overall exterior of the structure is in fair condition
(not good or great). ARG (2016) states that there are many Tudor Revival examples in the City
of Arcadia.
DPR 523L (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 28 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California
Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date Feb. 10, 2025 X Continuation Update
At noted by McKenna et al., this is not a true Tudor Revival residence, but an eclectic version of
the style. It is not a good example of a (eclectic) Tudor Revival residence and there are likely
many other examples within the City that would better fit the category.
McKenna et al. has concluded there is significant loss of architectural integrity to argue this is not
a locally significant resource and, as it is also an eclectic version of the Tudor Revival period, it is
not representative of the period. Taking into account the seven elements of integrity, McKenna
et al. has determined the following:
Location: The improvements are within their original location, although there has been
a minor shift in the northern property boundary
Design: The design of the improvements are almost as designed, but maintenance
and renovations over the years have resulted in the loss of original materials,
some design elements, and the redesign of others. Although the use of the
main residence and garage remain the same, the uses of the other structures
have changes. The changes in use resulted in changes in design.
Setting: When the improvements were initially built, the area was considered rural
and the residence and garage were surrounded by orchards and the chicken
coops with few nearby residences. Eventually, larger holdings were subdi-
vided and additional residential development occurred, resulting in the loss
of the rural setting and the development of the suburban community with var-
ious periods of development. The initial setting was lost.
Materials: As noted above, much of the original materials associated with the residence,
garage, and second residence have been lost to the replacement of roofs,
resurfacing of siding, and loss or addition of doors and windows. While the
structures may initially appear to be original, close examination has shown
the original exterior materials have been lost throughout the years of mainte-
nance and renovation.
Workmanship: No information was found to associate the improvements on the property to
any architect of renown, any significant contractor, or any artisan of note.
The designs are basic and standard. While many of the windows appears to
DPR 523L (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 29 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California
Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date Feb. 10, 2025 X Continuation Update
be substantial, they are actually quite basic and were constructed of standard
materials in the usual manner of manufacturing. No special glass was used
in the windows and the doors are not unique. Overall, the workmanship is
standard.
Feeling: “Feeling” is a very subjective element of integrity. In this case, however,
McKenna et al. would argue the original developments were completed in a
rural setting where there was considerable space between residences and
property owners has a sense of space and privacy. When looking out their
respective windows, they tended to see their own property and their own im-
provements. Over the years, as ownership changed, lots were subdivided,
and new building occurred, there was a loss of space and the area became
a densely populated community. As such, the “feeling” of the area naturally
changed and the original “feeling” of being in the original setting was lost.
Association: “Association” may mean, but not be limited to, two things: 1) an association
with “persons,” or 2) an association with other improvements in the area (e.g.
a district). In this case, there were only two main owners during the historic
period (pre-1963): George Heron and David Shadid. Heron was a chicken
farmer and held a larger piece of land while Shadid was a shoe repairman
and was associated with Lot 9, only. Neither was a significant person in his-
tory and neither maintained the associations needed to establish integrity,
despite years on the property.
With respect to association to the area, the original improvements were lo-
cated in a rural setting with fewer neighbors. Over the years, additional res-
idences were constructed and the population grew. More recently, since the
1990s (+/-) original residences that would otherwise be considered old
enough for consideration as historic properties (50 years or more) have been
subjected to redevelopment. In the immediate area of 2506 Florence Ave-
nue, the structures located along Florence Avenue, between Woodruff Ave-
nue and Los Altos Avenue, have major variations in dates of construction.
For example:
2500 Florence Avenue 2010
2510 Florence Avenue 1955-61
DPR 523L (1/13) * Required Information
State of California
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION
CONTINUATION SHEET
Primary #
HRI #
Trinomial
Page 30 of 81 *Resource Name or # (assigned by recorder) 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia, California
Recorded by: Jeanette A. McKenna *Date Feb. 10, 2025 X Continuation Update
2518 Florence Avenue 1969
527 Woodruff Avenue 1982
601 Woodruff Avenue 1947-50
2515 Florence Avenue 1987
2511 Florence Avenue 2015
2505 Florence Avenue 1986
2501 Florence Avenue 1941-49
As listed, the property at 2506 Florence Avenue is representative of the earliest improvement
remaining on the block, but the association with the historic period has been lost to redevelop-
ments. Now, when looking out the front door of 2506 Florence Avenue, one is facing three very
modern and large residential development –noticeably different form the historic neighborhood.,
In summarizing the integrity of the property at 2506 Florence Avenue, McKenna et al. found the
property to maintain integrity under only one category – Location. All others were either question-
able or did not apply. Therefore, the property lacks integrity and does not meet the minimum
requirements for recognition as a historically significant property. The 5S3 status should be ne-
gated and this property should not be included in the historic resources inventory for the City of
Arcadia.
McKenna et al. concluded the property is in fair to poor condition, altered,
renovated, and not significant. It lacks the necessary integrity for recognition
under CEQA and, therefore, would not qualify for listing on the State or local
registers. Overall, the property fails to meet any of the four CEQA criteria for
recognition as a potentially significant cultural resource. Therefore, redevel-
opment of this property will not constitute an adverse environmental impact.
The property has been photographed in detail and no further investigations
are warranted.
DP
R
5
2
3
L
(
1
/
1
3
)
*
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
St
a
t
e
o
f
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
O
F
P
A
R
K
S
A
N
D
R
E
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CO
N
T
I
N
U
A
T
I
O
N
S
H
E
E
T
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
#
HR
I
#
Tr
i
n
o
m
i
a
l
Pa
g
e
31
of
81
*Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
N
a
m
e
o
r
#
(
a
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
b
y
r
e
c
o
r
d
e
r
)
25
0
6
F
l
o
r
e
n
c
e
Av
e
n
u
e
,
A
r
c
a
d
i
a
,
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
Re
c
o
r
d
e
d
b
y
:
Je
a
n
e
t
t
e
A
.
M
c
K
e
n
n
a
*D
a
t
e
Fe
b
.
10
,
20
25
X
Co
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n
Up
d
a
t
e
DP
R
5
2
3
L
(
1
/
1
3
)
*
R
e
q
u
i
r
e
d
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
St
a
t
e
o
f
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
DE
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
O
F
P
A
R
K
S
A
N
D
R
E
C
R
E
A
T
I
O
N
CO
N
T
I
N
U
A
T
I
O
N
S
H
E
E
T
Pr
i
m
a
r
y
#
HR
I
#
Tr
i
n
o
m
i
a
l
Pa
g
e
32 of
81
*Re
s
o
u
r
c
e
N
a
m
e
o
r
#
(
a
s
s
i
g
n
e
d
b
y
r
e
c
o
r
d
e
r
)
25
0
6
F
l
o
r
e
n
c
e
Av
e
n
u
e
,
A
r
c
a
d
i
a
,
C
a
l
i
f
o
r
n
i
a
Re
c
o
r
d
e
d
b
y
:
Je
a
n
e
t
t
e
A
.
M
c
K
e
n
n
a
*D
a
t
e
Fe
b
.
10
,
20
25
X
Co
n
t
i
n
u
a
t
i
o
n
Up
d
a
t
e
Overview of Florence Avenue from 2506 Florance Avenue, Arcadia (N)
Overview of Florence Avenue from 2506 Florance Avenue, Arcadia (S)
Residence at 2510 Florance Avenue, Arcadia (1953-61; SE)
Modern Residence at 2518 Florance Avenue, Arcadia (1969; SE)
Modern Residence at 2515 Florance Avenue, Arcadia (1987; SW)
Modern Residence at 2511 Florance Avenue, Arcadia (2015; W)
Modern Residence at 2505 Florance Avenue, Arcadia (1986; NW)
Residence at 2501 Florance Avenue, Arcadia (1941-44; W)
Corner of Florence Avenue and Los Altos Avenue, Arcadia (NE)
Modern Residence at 2500 Florance Avenue, Arcadia (2010; E)
Overview of Property at 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (ESE)
Detail of Residence at 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (ESE)
West Elevation of Garage, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (E)
Front Yard, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (S)
North and West Elevations, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (ESE)
Entry on West Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (ESE)
Windows on West Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (E)
Window Detail, West Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (ENE)
Main Entry on West Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (E)
Main Entry on North Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (NE)
Window Detail, West Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (ENE)
Soouthwest Corner of Residence with Chimney, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (E)
Window Detail, West Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (NE)
Chimnay on South Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (NE)
Overview of South Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (ENE)
Floor Vent on South Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (NE)
Sealed Entry at Main Entrance, West Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (NE)
North Elevation behind Wooden Fence, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (SE)
North Elevation behind Fence, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (WSW)
Window and Door Detail on West Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (SSW)
North Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (SSE)
Roof Junction on North Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (S)
North elevation Stoop with Expansion, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (S)
Overview of East Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (SE)
East Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (W)
East Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (W)
Overview of East Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (NW)
Window Detail, East Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (NW)
South Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (W)
Window Detail, South Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (NW)
Floor Vent on South Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (NW)
Foundation Seam on South Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (NW)
Roof Junction, South Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (N)
Chimney Ash Door, South Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (NW)
Overview of East Elevation, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (N)
South Elevation of Garage, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (N)
South and East Elevations of Garage, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arca dia (NW)
Door on East Elevation of Garage, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (W)
Window Detail, South Elevation of Garage, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (NW)
West Elevation of Garage, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (E)
Door Detail, Garage, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (SE)
West Elevation of Garage, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (SE)
North Elevation of Garage, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (E)
Shed Addition to Garage, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (SE)
Window Detail, North Elevation of Shed, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (SSE)
Patched Window, North Elevation of Shed, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (SE)
East Elevation of Shed, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (SW)
East Elevation of Shed, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (S)
Window Detail on East Elevation of Shed, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (SW)
Concrete Expanse and Modern Shed in Rear Yard, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (E)
Broken Concrete Expanse, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (E)
Burned Tree Stump adjacent to Concrete Expanse, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (SW)
Modern Shed to Rear of Yard, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (E)
Concrete Expanse between Modern Shed and Garage, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (W)
Rear Yard, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (S)
Concrete beneath Modern Shed, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (ENE)
South Elevation of Modern Shed, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (N)
Concrete Expanse on Northern Portion of Rear Yard, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (NW)
East Elevation of Second Residence, 2506 1/2 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (W)
East Elevation of Second Residence, 2506 1/2 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (W)
Window Detail, East Elevation, 2506 1/2 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (SW)
Possible Cess Pool Cap adjacent to 2506 1/2 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (W)
Water Heater Closet on East Elevation, 2506 1/2 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (SW)
Detail of Eaves, East Elevation, 2506 1/2 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (S)
Window Detail, East Elevation, 2506 1/2 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (SW)
South Elevation, 2506 1/2 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (W)
South Elevation, 2506 1/2 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (NNW)
Window and A/C Detail, South Elevation, 2506 1/2 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (NW)
Overview on West Elevation, 2506 1/2 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (N)
Main Entry, West Elevation, 2506 1/2 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (NNE)
Fixed Window, West Elevation, 2506 1/2 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (SE)
Fixed Window, West Elevation, 2506 1/2 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (ENE)
Pipes and Clean-out Plug, West Elevation, 2506 1/2 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (E)
Overview of West Elevation, 2506 1/2 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (S)
Second Entry on North Elevation, 2506 1/2 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (SE)
North Elevation with Shed Roof Design, 2506 1/2 Florence Avenue , Arcadia (S)
Make-Shift BBQ on Southwest Corner of 2506 1/2 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (NW)
Concrete and Breick to West of 2506 1/2 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (SW)
Overview of Area West of 2506 1/2 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (S)
Gated Entry at Garage/Shed on Northern Property Boundary. 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (W)
Asphalt Driveway from Garage, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (W)
Gated Entry on Southwest Corner of Garage, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (E)
Pavers on North Side of Residence, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (WSW)
Louver Windows on North Elevation of Residence, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (S)
Fireplace within Residence, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (S)
Fireplace within Residence, 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (S)
Mature Evergreen in Front Yard of 2506 Florence Avenue, Arcadia (S)